DOCSLIB.ORG

Documento Completo Descargar Archivo

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Documento Completo Descargar Archivo Clasificación de las recomendaciones obtenidas del BlueFinder para la propiedad semántica birthPlace Lic. Andrea Noemí Alende Directora: Dra. Alicia Díaz Trabajo Final Integrador para obtener el grado de Especialista en Ingeniería de Software Facultad de Informática Universidad Nacional de La Plata Mayo, 2015 Resumen ikipedia es una gran enciclopedia editada colaborativamente por usuarios de todo el mundo. DBpedia es un proyecto desarrollado para extraer información estructurada de Wikipedia. La W información semántica extraída de facilita la búsqueda de información que en algunos casos no es posible obtener navegando por Wikipedia. Para resolver este gap de información entre la web semántica y la web social, podemos aplicar el algoritmo BlueFinder que devuelve un conjunto de recomendaciones en forma de caminos navegacionales para una propiedad semántica de DBpedia en Wikipedia. En este artículo se analizará el nivel de precisión de los resultados de la aplicación de dicho algoritmo. Se propondrá entonces una taxonomía que permita clasificar un conjunto de recomendaciones para luego determinar la validez de las mismas. Índice Resumen ........................................................................................................................................................ ii Índice ............................................................................................................................................................ iii Índice de Figuras ............................................................................................................................................ iv 1 Introducción ........................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Contexto ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Objetivo ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 Estructura ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Tecnologías Relacionadas ....................................................................................................................... 4 2.1. Web Semántica................................................................................................................................................. 4 2.1.1. Lenguajes de la Web Semanticá ......................................................................................................... 6 2.1.1.1. RDF - Resource Descripcion Framework ........................................................................................................... 6 2.1.1.2. RDFS – RDFS Schema. .......................................................................................................................................... 8 2.1.1.3. OWL Ontology Web Language ............................................................................................................................ 9 2.1.2. Lenguaje de Consulta – SPARQL ....................................................................................................... 10 2.2. Wikipedia ........................................................................................................................................................ 12 2.2.1. Recursos para estructurar información en Wikidata ...................................................................... 13 2.2.2. Infoboxes ............................................................................................................................................ 15 2.2.3. Categorías ........................................................................................................................................... 17 2.3. Dbpedia ........................................................................................................................................................... 20 2.3.1. Ontología de DBpedia ....................................................................................................................... 21 2.3.2. SPARQL endpoint ............................................................................................................................... 22 2.3.3. La importancia de DBpedia en el enfoque global de Linked Open Data ....................................... 24 3. BlueFinder ............................................................................................................................................ 28 3.1. Sistemas de recomendación basados en filtrado colaborativo ................................................................... 28 3.2. BlueFinder ....................................................................................................................................................... 30 3.3. Debilidades detectadas en BlueFinder .......................................................................................................... 34 3.3.1. Ejemplo 1 ............................................................................................................................................ 34 3.3.2. Ejemplo 2 ............................................................................................................................................ 35 3.3.3. Ejemplo 3 ............................................................................................................................................ 37 3.3.4. Ejemplo 4 ............................................................................................................................................ 39 4. Clasificación de las recomendaciones ................................................................................................... 42 4.1. Taxonomía propuesta .................................................................................................................................... 42 4.1.1. Clases Positivas .................................................................................................................................. 42 4.1.2. Clases Negativas ................................................................................................................................ 43 4.2. Descripción de la Metodología ...................................................................................................................... 44 4.3. Evaluación y análisis estadístico .................................................................................................................... 47 5. Conclusiones y Trabajos Futuros ........................................................................................................... 50 5.1. Conocimientos adquiridos ............................................................................................................................. 50 5.2. Conclusiones ................................................................................................................................................... 50 5.3. Trabajos futuros ............................................................................................................................................. 51 Referencias .................................................................................................................................................. 53 Índice de Figuras Logo de la Web Semántica y W3C ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Modelo de la Web Semántica propuesto por Tim Berners-Lee (Berners-Lee, Hendler, & Lassila, The Semantic Web, 2001) 5 Modelo de la Web Semántica propuesto por el W3C ................................................................................................................. 6 Wikipedia logo 2.0 - Wikimedia Foundation .............................................................................................................................. 13 "Wikidata-logo-en" by Planemad - Own work. Licensed under Public Domain via Wikimedia Commons ........................... 13 Los elementos y sus datos están interconectados. (Wikidata, 2015) ....................................................................................... 14 Este diagrama sugiere los términos más importantes que resultan interesantes en torno a Wikidata. (Wikidata, 2015) . 15 Ejemplo de Infobox del articulo Norwegian Lundehund en la Wikipedia en Ingles ................................................................ 16 La Categorización de artículos en Wikipedia y su modo de usarlo ........................................................................................... 18 Category:Milán ............................................................................................................................................................................ 18 Category:People from Milan ........................................................................................................................................................ 19 Category:People from Milan by occupation .............................................................................................................................. 19 Category: SportPeople from Milan ............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Culture of Wikipedia
    Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia Good Faith Collaboration The Culture of Wikipedia Joseph Michael Reagle Jr. Foreword by Lawrence Lessig The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Web edition, Copyright © 2011 by Joseph Michael Reagle Jr. CC-NC-SA 3.0 Purchase at Amazon.com | Barnes and Noble | IndieBound | MIT Press Wikipedia's style of collaborative production has been lauded, lambasted, and satirized. Despite unease over its implications for the character (and quality) of knowledge, Wikipedia has brought us closer than ever to a realization of the centuries-old Author Bio & Research Blog pursuit of a universal encyclopedia. Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia is a rich ethnographic portrayal of Wikipedia's historical roots, collaborative culture, and much debated legacy. Foreword Preface to the Web Edition Praise for Good Faith Collaboration Preface Extended Table of Contents "Reagle offers a compelling case that Wikipedia's most fascinating and unprecedented aspect isn't the encyclopedia itself — rather, it's the collaborative culture that underpins it: brawling, self-reflexive, funny, serious, and full-tilt committed to the 1. Nazis and Norms project, even if it means setting aside personal differences. Reagle's position as a scholar and a member of the community 2. The Pursuit of the Universal makes him uniquely situated to describe this culture." —Cory Doctorow , Boing Boing Encyclopedia "Reagle provides ample data regarding the everyday practices and cultural norms of the community which collaborates to 3. Good Faith Collaboration produce Wikipedia. His rich research and nuanced appreciation of the complexities of cultural digital media research are 4. The Puzzle of Openness well presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Point of View: a Wikipedia Reader
    w ikipedia pedai p edia p Wiki CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW A Wikipedia Reader 2 CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW A Wikipedia Reader CRITICAL POINT OF VIEW 3 Critical Point of View: A Wikipedia Reader Editors: Geert Lovink and Nathaniel Tkacz Editorial Assistance: Ivy Roberts, Morgan Currie Copy-Editing: Cielo Lutino CRITICAL Design: Katja van Stiphout Cover Image: Ayumi Higuchi POINT OF VIEW Printer: Ten Klei Groep, Amsterdam Publisher: Institute of Network Cultures, Amsterdam 2011 A Wikipedia ISBN: 978-90-78146-13-1 Reader EDITED BY Contact GEERT LOVINK AND Institute of Network Cultures NATHANIEL TKACZ phone: +3120 5951866 INC READER #7 fax: +3120 5951840 email: [email protected] web: http://www.networkcultures.org Order a copy of this book by sending an email to: [email protected] A pdf of this publication can be downloaded freely at: http://www.networkcultures.org/publications Join the Critical Point of View mailing list at: http://www.listcultures.org Supported by: The School for Communication and Design at the Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (Hogeschool van Amsterdam DMCI), the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS) in Bangalore and the Kusuma Trust. Thanks to Johanna Niesyto (University of Siegen), Nishant Shah and Sunil Abraham (CIS Bangalore) Sabine Niederer and Margreet Riphagen (INC Amsterdam) for their valuable input and editorial support. Thanks to Foundation Democracy and Media, Mondriaan Foundation and the Public Library Amsterdam (Openbare Bibliotheek Amsterdam) for supporting the CPOV events in Bangalore, Amsterdam and Leipzig. (http://networkcultures.org/wpmu/cpov/) Special thanks to all the authors for their contributions and to Cielo Lutino, Morgan Currie and Ivy Roberts for their careful copy-editing.
    [Show full text]
  • Main Page from Meta, a Wikimedia Project Coordination Wiki Jump To
    Main Page From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki Jump to: navigation <#mw-head>, search <#p-search> Meta-Wiki * * Mission </wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Mission> * * Projects </wiki/Wikimedia_projects>> (complete list </wiki/Complete_list_of_Wikimedia_projects>) * * Research </wiki/Research:Index> * * Translation </wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Meta:Babylon> (requests </wiki/Translation_requests>) * * Vision </wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Vision> *Welcome to Meta-Wiki </wiki/Meta:About_Meta>*, the global community site for the Wikimedia projects </wiki/Wikimedia_projects> and the Wikimedia movement </wiki/Wikimedia_movement> in general. Meta-Wiki's discussions range from coordination and documentation to planning and analysis of future Wikimedia activities. Other meta-focused wikis such as Wikimedia Outreach <//outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/> are specialized projects that have their roots in Meta-Wiki. Related discussion also takes place on Wikimedia mailing lists </wiki/Mailing_lists/Overview> (particularly *wikimedia-l </wiki/Mailing_lists#Wikimedia_mailing_list>*, with its low-traffic equivalent WikimediaAnnounce </wiki/Mailing_lists#Wikimedia_Announcements_mailing_list>), IRC channels </wiki/IRC> on freenode, individual wikis of Wikimedia affiliates </wiki/Wikimedia_movement_affiliates>, and other places. *Goings-on* *Requests* [Edit / Translate <//meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Main_Page/WM_News&action=edit>] November 2015 Wikipedia-W-bold-in-square.svg </wiki/File:Wikipedia-W-bold-in-square.svg> 1: Wikipedia Asian Month </wiki/Wikipedia_Asian_Month>
    [Show full text]
  • 'Anyone Can Edit' Not Everyone Does: Wikipedia and the Gender
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by LSE Research Online Heather Ford and Judy Wajcman ‘Anyone can edit’ not everyone does: Wikipedia and the gender gap Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Ford, Heather and Wajcman, Judy (2016) ‘Anyone can edit’, not everyone does: Wikipedia and the gender gap. Social Studies of Science . ISSN 0306-3127 (In Press) © 2016 The Authors This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/68675/ Available in LSE Research Online: December 2016 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. ‘Anyone can edit’, not everyone does: Wikipedia and the gender gap Heather Ford and Judy Wajcman Introduction Wikipedia has a gender problem. While the exact numbers are difficult to estimate, no one disputes that the overwhelming majority of contributors are male (Glott et al., 2010; Wikimedia Foundation, 2011; Hill & Shaw, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Britons Trust Wikipedia 'More Than the News' 10 August 2014
    Britons trust Wikipedia 'more than the news' 10 August 2014 encyclopedia—which relies on the public for its contributions and corrections—was "flawed" but said that people "turn to us for reliable, solid information .... We do a decent job of it." The YouGov survey revealed however that the traditional Encyclopaedia Britannica is viewed as the most reliable source of information by far, trusted by 83 percent of respondents. "I'm not going to rest until they trust us more than they ever trusted Encyclopaedia Britannica in the past," Wales said. After three days of discussions, the "Wikimania" The Wikipedia logo is seen on a tablet screen on annual event closed with a moment of silence for December 4, 2012 in Paris contributors who had died in the past year. This included Ihor Kostenko, a 22-year-old Ukrainian geography student who was shot dead in British people trust Wikipedia more than the pro-European protests in Kiev in February. Wales mainstream media, the information site's founder named him "Wikipedian of the year". Jimmy Wales said Sunday, at the close of a three- day conference of the Wikimedia movement in © 2014 AFP London. A YouGov poll of almost 2,000 British adults found 64 percent trust the authors of Wikipedia entries to tell the truth "a great deal" or "a fair amount". This compared to 61 percent who trusted BBC news journalists, 45 percent who trusted journalists on broadsheet newspapers such as The Times and The Guardian, and 13 percent for journalists on tabloids such as The Sun. "British people trust Wikipedia more than the news," Wales told the conference, to cheers from the audience.
    [Show full text]
  • Wikipedia & Why It Belongs in Education
    Wikipedia & Why It Belongs In Education Anna Koval, M.Ed. Wikipedia Education Program Wikimedia Foundation @msannakoval Who am I and why should you care?? ★ Teacher ★ Librarian ★ Master of Education Who am I and why should you care?? ★ Walt Disney Teacher of the Year Nominee ★ American Library Association Emerging Leader ★ Co-author of the Model School Library Standards for California Public Schools Who am I and why should you care?? ★ Wikipedia Education Program ★ Wikimedia Foundation Before I tell you what I think about Wikipedia, first let's find out what you think about Wikipedia! What is something good about Wikipedia? What do you really think about Wikipedia? ;) Imagine a world... in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. That’s what we do. But before I tell you how, first let me tell you why… Generation Z. This generation is different. CC BY 4.0 by McCrindle mccrindle.com.au/ This encyclopedia is different. The Printed Britannica: 29 volumes, 950 pages each The Printed Wikipedia: 7,473 volumes, 700 pages each ★ ~½ billion ★ +35.4 million visitors monthly total articles ★ +2 million ★ ~8 thousand total editors new articles per day ★ +77 thousand ★ +10 million active editors edits per month ★ ~1 thousand ★ ~10 thousand very active editors edits per hour Sources: https://reportcard.wmflabs.org/ and https://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesWikipediaZZ.htm Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Five_pillars Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Core_content_policies The idea behind the Wikipedia Education Program is simple: educators and students around the world contribute to Wikipedia and Wikimedia projects in an academic setting.
    [Show full text]
  • Wikipedia Cd Iso Download Wikipedia Cd Iso Download
    wikipedia cd iso download Wikipedia cd iso download. The Wikimedia Foundation and Linterweb announces the release of Wikipedia Version 0.5, a compact disc collection of around 2,000 articles from the English Wikipedia. The project paves the way for many such collections, with larger releases planned in a variety of languages. Articles were chosen based on criteria for quality and importance set by the Wikipedia community. Topics covered include, among others, geography, arts, literature, science, history, and natural sciences. Users can browse articles using a built-in search engine or by surfing navigational pages. Martin A. Walker, a chemistry professor at the State University of New York at Potsdam, played a central role in the production of Wikipedia Version 0.5, and in setting criteria for article selection. “ Although this is only a test release, we really tried to produce something the Wikipedia community could feel proud of. We wanted to cover the major topics, while also including a selection of articles considered to be the very best of Wikipedia. These ‘featured articles’ aim to be well written and comprehensive, and also free from errors, bias, vandalism and marketing ”, states Walker. The community members are welcome to take part in this innovating project, either by helping for the selection process, or by helping at the development of the open-source project Kiwix, which is the software part of the CD. “ We hope that everyone is able to participate at the future development of the Encyclopedia, and be proud of its reach. ”, Pascal Martin emphasizes. Wikimedia France was at the forefront of bringing the CD collection to fruition, and securing the deal with Linterweb, a French technology company.
    [Show full text]
  • Audiences I Community Tech, Community Health, Contributors, Audiences Design, and Audiences Operations
    Audiences I Community Tech, Community Health, Contributors, Audiences Design, and Audiences Operations July 2017 quarterly check-in All content is © Wikimedia Foundation & available under CC BY-SA 4.0, unless noted otherwise. Community Tech: Community Wishlist team Meet the needs of active Wikimedia contributors for improved, expert-focused curation and moderation tools. CHECK IN TEAM/DEPT July 2017 Community Tech [2016 Community Wishlist] Rank Proposal Status 1 Global gadgets 2 Edit summary length for non-Latin languages Database work by Platform team Q1 3 Section heading URLs for non-Latin languages Q1 4 Global settings Q1 5 Rewrite XTools Beta version live 6 Wikitext editor syntax highlighting Releasing next week 7 Warning on unsuccessful login attempts Releasing next week 8 Automatic archive for new external links 9 Fix Mr.Z-bot’s popular pages report Released Q3 10 User rights expiration Released Q4 (by volunteer) CHECK IN TEAM/DEPT PROGRAM WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION July 2017 Community Tech 5 [LINK] ANNUAL PLAN GOAL: Build trust and cooperation with Enwiki contributors What is your workflow? Who are you working with? What impact / deliverables are you expecting? Engage with New Page LAST QUARTER Patrol community on English WP to New Page Patrol community, Compiled stats and published report on Enwiki May determine solutions for assistance on report from Global 31st, active ongoing conversations with volunteers who the growing page Collaboration, Reading, Research, work on New Page Patrol. In June, proposed working review backlog Community
    [Show full text]
  • Common Issues Faced by Indic Wikipedia
    Indic Wikipedia Policies & Guidelines Handbook Table of content Preface Introduction to policies Types of policies Features of a policy page Necessity of policies and guidelines Creating policies Proposing Village pump Article or project talk page Policy page and its talk page Initial proposal Highlighting important discussion Discussing Consensus Implementing Modifying or updating an existing policy Enforcements Common issues faced by Indic Wikipedia communities Missing or incomplete policy pages Incomplete or untranslated policy pages Lack of active translators/editors Addressing the issues Dedicated team or task force Using MediaWiki translation tool Policy mapping Credits Images Text Screenshots Planning suggestions Proofreading: Preface Currently CIS-A2K is working with five Indian-language Wikimedia communities (Kannada, Konkani, Marathi, Odia and Telugu). While working with the mentioned Indic Wikimedia communities, we observed a number of issues affecting them and we also noticed that there are many similarities between the issues and difficulties faced by these communities. So, we decided to create this “Indic Wikipedia Policies and Guidelines Handbook”. At first, we created a short handbook discussing a number of topics, such as how to create new policies, or modify the existing ones, using village pump, enforcing policies etc. Then we talked to Indic Wikipedians to know more about the policy and guideline related issues and problems they are facing. We also asked for their feedback on the first draft of this handbook. When we contacted them and requested them to join our survey, we received overwhelming responses from them. We must thank everyone who has taken part in our surveys and we will continue communicating with Indic Wikimedians.
    [Show full text]
  • Verdeckte PR in Wikipedia
    Otto Brenner Stiftung OBS-Arbeitsheft 76 OBS-Arbeitsheft 76 Verdeckte PR in Wikipedia Marvin Opp0ng Verdeckte PR in Wikipedia Das Weltwissen im Visier von Unternehmen Eine Studie der Otto Brenner Stiftung www.otto-brenner-stiftung.de Frankfurt/Main 2014 Die Otto Brenner Stiftung … Aktuelle Ergebnisse der Forschungsförderung in der Reihe „OBS-Arbeitshefte“ ... ist die gemeinnützige Wissen- zugänglich und veröffentlicht schaftsstiftung der IG Metall. z. B. die Ergebnisse ihrer For- Sie hat ihren Sitz in Frankfurt am schungsförderung in der Reihe OBS-Arbeitsheft 76 Main. Als Forum für gesellschaft- „OBS-Arbeitshefte“. Die Arbeits- liche Diskurse und Einrichtung hefte werden, wie auch alle an- Marvin Opp0ng der Forschungsförderung ist sie deren Publikationen der OBS, Verdeckte PR in Wikipedia OBS-Arbeitsheft 76 dem Ziel der sozialen Gerechtig- kostenlos abgegeben. Über die Das Weltwissen im Visier von Unternehmen ISSN 1863-6934 (Print) keit verpflichtet. Besonderes Homepage der Stiftung können Augenmerk gilt dabei dem Aus- sie auch elektronisch bestellt OBS-Arbeitsheft 75 gleich zwischen Ost und West. werden. Vergriffene Hefte halten Olaf Hoffjann, Jeannette Gusko Herausgeber: wir als PDF zum Download be- ... initiiert den gesellschaftli- reit. Der Partizipationsmythos Otto Brenner Stiftung chen Dialog durch Veranstaltun- Wie Verbände Facebook, Twitter & Co. nutzen Jupp Legrand gen, Workshops und Koopera- … freut sich über jede ideelle Un- tionsveranstaltungen (z. B. im terstützung ihrer Arbeit. Aber OBS-Arbeitsheft 74 Wilhelm-Leuschner-Straße
    [Show full text]
  • Jahresbericht 2011, Vollständig (PDF)
    WIKIMEDIA ÖSTERREICH Gesellschaft zur Förderung freien Wissens Jahresbericht 2011 zur Mitgliederversammlung am 10. Dezember 2011 mit Gebarungsübersicht und Rechnungsprüfungsbericht wikimedia.at Glacisstraße 57/II, 8010 Graz, Österreich Telefon: +43 699 14128615 Fax: +43 316 810878 ZVR: 642058113 Berichte/2011 Jahresbilanz 1 Berichte/2011 Jahresbilanz Autorenförderung Fotoausrüstung Angeschafft wurden neben einer Kamera (Nikon D300S), ein Weitwinkelobjektiv (Sigma 12-24 EX DG HSM), ein lichtstarkes Teleobjektiv für den Nahbereich (Nikon AF-S 70-200mm F/2.8G ED VR II) und ein Stativ (Manfrotto 190XPROB). Bislang wurden mit der Ausrüstung bei zwei Fußballbundesliga-Spielen - dabei das Bundesliga-Meisterschaftsfinale Graz 2011 - und einer Exkursion in Podgorje (Slowenien) mehrere Tausend Fotos gemacht, von denen zumindest einige einzigartige und damit besonders wertvolle SK Sturm mit der Meisterschale 2011, Foto: Kurt Aufnahmen für Wikimedia Commons bereitgestellt werden konnten. Kulac, cc-by-sa-3.0 Geplant sind für die Zukunft bereits Fotoaktionen bei den Landtagen in Österreich und weiteren Bundesliga-Spielen. Dem Anwendungsbereich sind aber keine Grenzen gesetzt, Ideen sind herzlich willkommen und ausdrücklich erwünscht. Die Ausrüstung wurde auch versichert. Verwenden können sie alle Interessierten, wobei alle die bisher noch kein Interesse angemeldet haben, sich jedoch rechtzeitig melden sollten, damit der Versicherungsschutz auf sie ausgedehnt werden kann. Geplant ist eine Ergänzung der Ausrüstung um ein lichtstarkes Teleobjektiv für größere Distanzen und eine professionelle Blitzanlage. Pelatea klugiana aus Podgorje, Foto: Kurt Kulac, cc-by-sa-3.0 Weitere Fotografieprojekte Im Juli dieses Jahres fand im Hinblick auf eine bessere Bebilderung der Artikel rund um den Themenkomplex „Österreichische Bundespolizei“ bzw. Polizei allgemein in Kooperation mit dem Landespolizeikommando Vorarlberg einen Foto-Termin statt, anlässlich dem zwei junge Polizeibeamte (ein Mann und eine Frau) sich dazu bereit erklärt haben, sich in Dienstadjustierung fotografieren zu lassen.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    Human and Artificial Intelligence for the Society of the Future European Distance and E-Learning Network (EDEN) Proceedings 2020 Annual Conference | Timisoara, 22-24 June, 2020 ISSN 2707-2819 doi: 10.38069/edenconf-2020-ac0022 WIKIPEDIA, A SOCIOTECHNICAL RESOURCE? Teresa Cardoso, Filomena Pestana, Universidade Aberta, Laboratório de Educação a Distância e Elearning (LE@D), Portugal Abstract The process of digitization is transversal to the different domains of society, including the digitization of encyclopaedias, namely Britannica Online (surpassing its own centennial print edition). In turn, it was surpassed by Wikipedia, which emerged from the advent of web 2.0. Due to the cyclopean proportion that it reached throughout its 19 years of existence, it fulfils an old dream, i.e. to gather, in one place, all the knowledge of humanity – thus, somehow constituting the new library of Alexandria. It also responds to the demands of the digital world, namely by having followed a path aligned with digital and technological evolution, such as the constitution of a community that integrates both human and non-human agents. As Wikipedia is an essential tool when searching on the internet, our aim is to contribute to the understanding of this open resource. Moreover, we address the question of Wikipedia being a sociotechnical system, where bots, non-human collaborators, intervene, either in repetitive automated editions, or progressively expanding its scope, in a sophistication of actions that are not restricted to the content of the articles, but, instead, expand to socialize with the community of users. Introduction We live in a globalized society, with socio-cultural implications that incorporate the so- called new technologies, more commonly known as ICT – information and communication technologies.
    [Show full text]