DOCSLIB.ORG

Real-Time Flood Forecasting and Warning System Sava River Basin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Real-Time Flood Forecasting and Warning System Sava River Basin Development of Real-Time Flood Forecasting and Warning System for the Sava River Basin Klaas-Jan van Heeringen1, Hanneke Schuurmans2, Mihailo Anđelić3, Victor Simončić4, Imra Hodzic5, Sabina Hadziahmetovic5 ABSTRACT: Disastrous floods in May 2014 in Sava River basin resulted in 79 casualties and substantial economic damage in Croatia, Bosnia, Herzegovina, and Serbia. Assessments of the total damage in the area range up to 3.8 billion Euros. Distressing is the fact that besides flooding the Balkan region recently suffered from severe droughts as well. In order to be more resilient to flood and drought events, data and model output sharing is key. Better information will lead to better decisions. The Flood Forecasting and Warning System (Sava-FFWS) in which five countries jointly work together is at the forefront of transboundary cooperation. The FFWS, which is based on the well-known Delft-FEWS software, lends ample data and information enabling ultimately the decision makers to make right management decisions and implement operational measures to prevent and mitigate severe flood and drought situations on the basis of reliable forecasts of flows and discharges with a long lead time. The paper outlines key components of the Sava-FFWS illustrated with concrete application examples. Key words: real-time flood forecasting, Delft-FEWS, Sava river basin, Sava HIS, hydrological models, hydraulic models, numerical weather prediction, water levels, discharges, precipitation, temperature, snow, GIS data, dissemination Razvoj sistema za prognozu i upozorenje na velike vode u realnom vremenu za sliv reke Save APSTRAKT: Katastrofalne majske poplave iz 2014. godine u slivu reke Save pogodile su delove Bosne i Hercegovine, Hrvatske i Srbije i ostavile iza sebe pustoš: 79 osoba je izgubilo život a ogromna materijalna šteta je procenjena na preko 3.8 milijardi evra. Velika nevolja je i to što u poslednje vreme značajne delove Balkana često pogađaju i žestoke suše. Da bi se u regionu povećala otpornost na poplave i suše, od ključnog značaja je da se međusobno razmenjuju podaci osmatranja i rezultati modela za prognozu i najavu ovih fenomena – jer bolje informacije sledstveno rezultiraju u boljim odlukama i rešenjima. Sistem za prognozu i upozorenja na velike vodea u slivu reke Save (Sava-FFWS) u okviru kojeg 5 savskih zemalja rade zajedno predstavlja odličan primer dobre i višestruko korisne prekogranične saradnje u međunarodnom slivu. Za razvoj Sava-FFWS korišćen je dobro poznati Delft-FEWS softverski paket a razvijeni sistem omogućuje svestrane analize procesa oticanja i hidrološke prognoze u slivu reke Save, sa dovoljno dugim prognoznim periodom; kao takav, on daje savskim državama važan alat za donošenje pravilnih odluka i preduzimanje blagovremenih mera usmerenih na predupređenje ili ublažavanje posledica od poplava i suša u slivu reke Save. U radu su prezentirane glavne karakteristike Sava-FFWS i konkretni primeri primene. Ključne reči: prognoza velikih voda u realnom vermenu, Delft-FEWS, sliv Save, Sava HIS, hidrološki modeli, hidraulički modeli, numerička prognoza vremena, vodostaj, proticaj, padavine, temperature, sneg, GIS podaci, disseminacija prognoza 1 Deltares, [email protected] 2 Royal HaskoningDHV, [email protected] 3 Mihailo Anđelić, [email protected] 4 Eptisa, [email protected], [email protected] 5 HEIS, [email protected] 1 1 Introduction The Sava River basin covers an area of approximately 97,700 km2 including large parts of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, Serbia and Slovenia (see Figure 1 below). It is the largest tributary by discharge to the Danube River, with an average discharge of about 1700 m3/s, which accounts for almost 30% of the Danube’s total discharge at their confluence in Belgrade. The length of the Sava River, from its source in the western Slovenian mountains to the confluence with the Danube River, is well over 900 km [ISRBC 2017]. Figure 1. Sava River basin (data displayed on map is from the Sava GIS portal) Slika 1. Sliv reke Save (podaci prikazani na mapi preuzeti sa Sava GIS portala) Disastrous floods in May 2014 in Sava River basin resulted in 79 casualties and substantial economic damage in Croatia, Bosnia, Herzegovina, and Serbia [ICPDR 2015]. Assessments of the total damage in the area range up to 3.8 billion Euros. Distressing is the fact that besides flooding the Balkan region recently suffered from severe droughts as well. In order to be more resilient to flood and drought events, data and model output sharing is key. Better information will lead to better decisions. The Flood Forecasting and Warning System (Sava-FFWS) in which five countries jointly work together is at the forefront of transboundary cooperation. This system performs a number of sophisticated tasks and provides ample information to users that enables them to make right management decisions and implement operational measures to prevent and mitigate severe flood and drought situations on the basis of reliable forecasts of flows and discharges with a long lead time of forecast. Starting from June 2016 onward, Deltares, along with Royal HaskoningDHV, Eptisa, the Hydro-Engineering Institute of Sarajevo and Mihailo Anđelić has been implementing the World Bank- funded regional project entitled “Joint Flood Forecasting and Management in the Sava River Basin”. The project’s main objective is to develop and establish an integrated real-time flood forecasting and warning system for the entire Sava River Basin (the so called Sava FFWS), which is jointly operated and maintained by the 5 Sava riparian countries (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, 2 Serbia and Slovenia) in close cooperation, coordination and support of the Secretariat of the International Sava River Basin Commission (ISRBC). Operational forecasting is not only dependent on the availability of a proper forecasting system, but also on skilled, well-trained staff and good coordination between its users. Because of the complex hydrographic network of the Sava basin, many hydrological links exist between the riparian countries, while some of these links are multiple in nature. This is also reflected in the large number of beneficiary institutions (19 in total) involved in the project. This means that there is a strong need for international cooperation and requires to set-up a mature organization with well-defined and mutually agreed upon set of working procedures. 2 Stakeholders The five riparian countries of the Sava River basin are Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, Serbia and Slovenia. These countries with the exception of Montenegro, are members of the International Sava River Basin Commission (ISRBC) that has been established to implement the Framework Agreement on the Sava River Basin (FASRB). The ISRBC Secretariat is the administrative and executive body of the ISRBC. In addition to the ISRBC, Table 1 provides an overview of the national organizations that are (direct) stakeholders in the Sava FFWS project. For efficient stakeholder interaction, project management and decision making the following organizational structure has been established within the project: Steering board. International Working Group. Country Working Groups. The Steering Board, the International Working Group and the Country Working Groups were established for the general purpose of management, monitoring and coordination of the Sava FFWS project implementation. The purpose of the Steering Board has been to monitor and make decisions about the FFWS project and its progress. The Steering Board members have been responsible for final decisions and resolving issues arising. They also comment on and approve conclusions of the International Working Group, and share their opinion about the deliverables with the World Bank. The purpose of the International Working Group has been to harmonize and verify the input of the Country Working Groups, discuss international elements of the Sava FFWS and test the milestone products before the products were considered sufficiently mature to be presented at the Steering Board meetings. The general purpose of the Country Working Groups has been to secure the input of the local interests, knowledge and workflows of each country. Nominated representatives from all five riparian countries have actively participated in the work of the above three project management bodies. As far as it has been practical and possible, the countries’ specialists who were already active in the existing ISRBC technical bodies have also been nominated to serve in these project bodies. Table 1. Stakeholders in the Sava-FFWS Project Tabela 1. Učesnici u realizaciji Sava-FFWS projecta Country Organization Role Bosnia and Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Water Policy making Herzegovina Management and Forestry Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Policy making Management of Republic of Srpska Federal Hydrometeorological Institute Operational forecasting for BiH Republic Hydrometeorological Institute Operational forecasting for BiH 3 Country Organization Role Public Institution JU “Vode Srpske” Operational forecasting for BiH Sava River Watershed Agency Operational forecasting for BiH Brčko District Government: Department of Public Safety District, Direct use of forecasts Department for agriculture, forestry and water management. Croatia Ministry of Environment and Energy Policy making Meteorological and Hydrological Service Operational forecasting for Croatia Croatian Waters Public water management
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rivers and Lakes in Serbia
    NATIONAL TOURISM ORGANISATION OF SERBIA Čika Ljubina 8, 11000 Belgrade Phone: +381 11 6557 100 Rivers and Lakes Fax: +381 11 2626 767 E-mail: [email protected] www.serbia.travel Tourist Information Centre and Souvenir Shop Tel : +381 11 6557 127 in Serbia E-mail: [email protected] NATIONAL TOURISM ORGANISATION OF SERBIA www.serbia.travel Rivers and Lakes in Serbia PALIĆ LAKE BELA CRKVA LAKES LAKE OF BOR SILVER LAKE GAZIVODE LAKE VLASINA LAKE LAKES OF THE UVAC RIVER LIM RIVER DRINA RIVER SAVA RIVER ADA CIGANLIJA LAKE BELGRADE DANUBE RIVER TIMOK RIVER NIŠAVA RIVER IBAR RIVER WESTERN MORAVA RIVER SOUTHERN MORAVA RIVER GREAT MORAVA RIVER TISA RIVER MORE RIVERS AND LAKES International Border Monastery Provincial Border UNESKO Cultural Site Settlement Signs Castle, Medieval Town Archeological Site Rivers and Lakes Roman Emperors Route Highway (pay toll, enterance) Spa, Air Spa One-lane Highway Rural tourism Regional Road Rafting International Border Crossing Fishing Area Airport Camp Tourist Port Bicycle trail “A river could be an ocean, if it doubled up – it has in itself so much enormous, eternal water ...” Miroslav Antić - serbian poet Photo-poetry on the rivers and lakes of Serbia There is a poetic image saying that the wide lowland of The famous Viennese waltz The Blue Danube by Johann Vojvodina in the north of Serbia reminds us of a sea during Baptist Strauss, Jr. is known to have been composed exactly the night, under the splendor of the stars. There really used to on his journey down the Danube, the river that connects 10 be the Pannonian Sea, but had flowed away a long time ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature Protection in the Legislative Framework in Montenegro
    13th COUNCIL OF EUROPE MEETING OF THE WORKSHOPS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN LANDSCAPE CONVENTION “Territories of the future, landscape identification and assessment: an exercise in democracy” Nature Protection in the legislative framework in Montenegro Marina Spahic, Directorate of Nature Protection General Directorate for Environmental Protection and Climate Change Legislation • The activity of nature protection in Montenegro is based on the : Law on Nature Protection ("Official Gazette of Montenegro", 51/08) Law on National Parks ("Official Gazette of Montenegro", 56/09). Draft Law on Amendments to the Law on Nature Protection was adopted by the Government on session held on 28 June 2012, which is now in the parliamentary procedure. • Draft Law on National Parks • Institutional framework • Ministry of Sustainable Development and Tourism • Environmental Protection Agency • Public Enterprise National Parks of Montenegro Clasification of protected areas • Special nature reserves • National Parks • Regional Parks⁄Parks of nature • Monuments of nature • Protected habitat • Landscapes of special natural characteristics (article 43) Declaration • Study of protection for the area • Parliament of Montenegro • Goverment of Montenegro • Local goverments • Register of Protected Areas Protected areas National parks – 7,77 % -Skadar lake-40.000 ha -Lovcen-6.400 ha -Durmitor-33.895 ha -Biogradska Gora- 5.400 ha -Prokletije-16.038 ha Monuments of Nature-0.987% Nature reserves- 0.047% Landscapes of special natural characteristic0.025% Territories
    [Show full text]
  • Drina River Basin Nexus Assessment - Phase II National Consultation Meeting KTH – Royal Institute of Technology: Emir Fejzić Youssef Almulla Dr
    Drina River Basin nexus assessment - Phase II National Consultation meeting KTH – Royal Institute of Technology: Emir Fejzić Youssef Almulla Dr. Vignesh Sridharan Dr. Francesco Gardumi 28/12/2020 National Consultation meeting 1 Agenda Key questions Scenarios Approach The river basin Preliminary results Hydro power plant cascade 28/12/2020 National Consultation meeting 2 Key questions to be addressed in Phase II • What role can renewables (hydro and non-hydro) in the Drina basin play in achieving the UNFCCC Nationally Determined Contributions? • What benefits does an increased share of non-hydro RES bring in terms of GHG emissions reduction and reduced stress on hydro power especially considering the need for flood containment measures. o To what extent may hydro power plants provide environmental services (e.g. environmental flows and flood control), and what impact does that have on their potential generation? • What are the effects of climate induced variability on hydropower generation? • What role could non-hydro RES play if the proposed plans for HPP development in the DRB are executed? • What effects can the Emission Trading Scheme, as part of the EU integration pathway, have on hydro and non-hydro RES development in the riparian countries? • In which way can hydro and non-hydro RES be impacted by the implementation of energy efficiency measures (demand- and supply-side)? 28/12/2020 National Consultation meeting 3 Scenarios proposed in Phase II • Reference scenario o Current policies, including INDC • Carbon pricing scenario o Effects
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping and Assessment Ecosystems and Their Services of Grassland and Forest in Montenegro (Project Title)
    ANNEX 5 TERMS OF REFERENCE Transfer of Czech Knowledge: Mapping and Assessment Ecosystems and their Services of Grassland and Forest in Montenegro (Project Title) Project Objectives: Czech Republic invested significant effort in quantifying what is the contribution of protected areas to national economy. During these processes undertaken by different institutions and organizations, several projects focused on mapping and assessing services provided by grassland and forests where implemented. These initiatives are contributing not only to disseminating the knowledge and understanding of value and importance of services provided by ecosystems but is directly contributing to global processes such as Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, The economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity etc). Taking in consideration that Montenegro is making first steps toward understanding and indorsing these initiatives and practice, through this project we would link these institutions with partner institutions from Montenegro, and establish linkages and partnerships that would be mutually beneficial. The main strength of the project would be focusing on learning by doing approach. Two pilot sites would be used as pilots for joint work of Czech and Montenegro experts in order to obtain detailed assessment of ecosystem services provided by forests and grasslands in these areas. Czech experience will be amended to fit Montenegro legal and development framework, and set of recommendations will be developed, based on experiences gained in PES schemes design in two pilot sites. Sites are predefined as area of Komovi and Piva Mountain massif. In these two areas UNDP CO Montenegro is working on establishment of two new protected areas (level of regional parks, category III as per IUCN categorization).
    [Show full text]
  • Support to Water Resources Management in the Drina River Basin
    Confluence of Lim River and Drina River, Republika Srpska, Bosnia & Herzegovina Summary of key facts related to HPPs in country reports Belgrade, January 25, 2016 Outlook on presentation • Electricity generation and consumption structure in Serbia • High voltage grid in Serbia • General situation of hydropower in Drina river basin • Existing hydropower plants in Drina river basin • Conceivable hydropower plants in Drina river basin • Recommendations 2 Production and consumption in Serbia 2010 2030 Production Consumption 3 Production and consumption in Bosnia 2010 2030 Consumption Origin of electricity 4 Production and consumption in Montenegro 2010 2030 Origin of electricity Consumption 5 High voltage grids Serbia Bosnia & Herzegovina Montenegro - Max. 400 kV - Max. 400 kV - Max. 400 kV - Ring structure - No ring structure - No ring structure - 6 links to foreign grids - 30 links to foreign grids - 11 links to foreign grids 6 Existing HPPs in Drina river basin SAVA 9 HPPs existing in Drina river basin DRINA CEHOTINA UVAC TARA PIVA LIM 7 Potential HPPs in Drina river basin 37 HPPs conceivably developable in Drina river basin 8 Existing / potential HPPs in Drina river basin Existing HPPs Conceivable HPPs BiH 1 + 2 BiH 9 + 7 Montenegro 1 Montenegro 17 Serbia 5 + 2 Serbia 4 + 7 Total 9 Total 37 1’964 MW Planned HPPs BiH 9 + 7 Montenegro 6 Serbia 3 + 7 Total 25 1’494 MW +76% power 9 Serbia – Present / conceivable HPPs • 2015: 7 HPPs in operation Total = 1’289 MW - Drina River : 2 HPPs Zvornik (96 MW), Bajina Basta HPP (368 MW) *) - Uvac River : 3 HPPs Radoinja (103 MW), Kokin Brod (21 MW), Uvac (36 MW) - Lim River : 1 HPPPotpeć (51 MW) - Pumped-storage PP Bajina Basta PSPP (614 MW) Environmental flow Up to 60 m3/s • 10 projects of new HPPs Total power 781 MW Total cost Ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Capacity Assessment Report with Recommendation For
    List of abbreviations B&H Bosnia and Herzegovina CA Capacity Assessment CB Capacity Building CD Capacity Development IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature LGU Local Governmental Unit MARD Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development MSDT Ministry of Sustainable Development and Tourism MTMA Ministry of Transport and Maritime Affairs MNE Montenegro MU Management unit NEPA Nature and Environmental Protection Agency NGO Non Governmental Organization NPD National Park “Durmitor” NPS National Park “Sutjeska” PAs Protected Areas PENP Public Enterprise “National parks of Montenegro” ANNEXES ANNEX I QUESTIONNAIRE 2 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.OBJECTIVE AND PLANNED RESULTS .................................................................................................................................................................... 6 3. METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 4. ENABLING ENVIRONMENT ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Overview of institutions ..................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • STREAMS of INCOME and JOBS: the Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins
    STREAMS OF INCOME AND JOBS: The Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Highlights – The Value of Water for Electricity 5 Highlights – The Value of Water for Agriculture 8 Highlights – The Value of Public Water Supplie 11 Highlights – The Value of Water for Tourism 12 Conclusion: 13 BACKGROUND OF THE BASINS 15 METHODOLOGY 19 LAND USE 21 GENERAL CONTEXT 23 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR ELECTRICITY 29 Background of the Trebišnjica and Neretva hydropower systems 30 Croatia 33 Republika Srpska 35 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 37 Montenegro 40 Case study – Calculating electricity or revenue sharing in the Trebišnjica basin 41 Gap Analysis – Water for Electricity 43 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR AGRICULTURE 45 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 46 Croatia 51 Case study – Water for Tangerines 55 Case study – Wine in Dubrovnik-Neretva County 56 Case study – Wine in Eastern Herzegovina 57 Republika Srpska 57 Gap Analysis – Water for Agriculture 59 Montenegro 59 THE VALUE OF PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES 63 Republika Srpska 64 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 66 Montenegro 68 Croatia 69 Gap Analysis – Public Water 70 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR TOURISM 71 Croatia 72 CONCLUSION 75 REFERENCES 77 1st edition Author/data analysis: Hilary Drew With contributions from: Zoran Mateljak Data collection, research, and/or translation support: Dr. Nusret Dresković, Nebojša Jerković, Zdravko Mrkonja, Dragutin Sekulović, Petra Remeta, Zoran Šeremet, and Veronika Vlasić Design: Ivan Cigić Published by WWF Adria Supported by the
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Strategy for Sustainable Hydropower in the Western Balkans
    This project is funded by the European Union REGIONAL STRATEGY FOR SUSTAINABLE HYDROPOWER IN THE WESTERN BALKANS Approach and Methodology Martyn Osborn - Key Expert, Energy Marko Kosir - Senior Project Manager & Team Leader 1st Workshop, Podgorica, 30-31 March 2017 The contents of this presentation are the sole responsibility of the Mott MacDonald IPF Consortium and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Project Synopsis Client: European Commission, DG NEAR Contractor: WBIF-IPF3 Consortium Expert team: 30 experts (EU and WB6) and 2 subcontractors Duration: Scoping Phase (May-June 2016 + Study Phase (Oct. 2016 – June/August 2017) Deliverables: 9 technical Background Reports, Final Report, 1 conference, 2 workshops, results-dissemination tour, inputs to the next MC-WB6 meeting (Trieste, 12.7.2017) Objective: Contribute to fostering the harnessing of environmentally and climate change sustainable hydropower generation in the WB6 region in line with strategic objectives of the European Union and the ECT obligations of its Contracting Parties. Purpose: Development of a study determining a list of hydro power project (HPP) development priorities by (i) river basin, (ii) type of planned HPP facilities (storage, run-of-river, reversible), through which the remaining hydro-power potential in the region will be evaluated. Aiming at utilising the sustainable hydropower potential, the following priorities shall apply: 1. Repair, refurbishment, upgrade and rehabilitation of existing HPPs 2. Sustainable greenfield HPPs Timeline
    [Show full text]
  • WBEC-REG-ENE-01 Final Report Author
    Code: WBEC-REG-ENE-01 REGIONAL STRATEGY FOR SUSTAINABLE HYDROPOWER IN THE WESTERN BALKANS Final Report August 2018 IPA 2011-WBIF-Infrastructure Project Facility- Technical Assistance 3 EuropeAid/131160/C/SER/MULTI/3C This project is funded by the European Union Information Class: EU Standard formation Class: EU Standard The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the Mott MacDonald IPF Consortium and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose. We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it. This r epor thas been prepared solely for use by the party which commissioned it (the ‘Client’) in connection with the captioned project. It should not be used for any other purpose. No person other than the Client or any party who has expressly agreed terms of r eliance with us ( the ‘Recipient(s)’) may r ely on the content, information or any views expressed in the report. We accept no duty of care, responsibility or liability to any other recipient of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Outlook on Water and Climate Change Vulnerability in The
    Outlook on Water and Climate Change Vulnerability in the Western Balkans 1 Cover photo Bajina Bašta accumulation on river Drina between Serbia (left side of the picture) and Bosnia and Herzegovina (right side of the picture) © photo: Gašper Šubelj Layout/editing Miluše Rollerová Legal notice This European Topic Centre on Inland, Coastal and Marine Waters (ETC/ICM) Technical Report has not been subject to a European Environment Agency (EEA) member country review but the contents have been presented and discussed in two workshops with representatives from West Balkan countries. The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the official opinions of the EEA, European Commission or other institutions of the European Communities. Neither the ETC/ICM nor any person or company acting on behalf of the ETC/ICM is responsible for the use that may be made of the information contained in this report. Copyright notice © ETC/ICM, UFZ, 2018 Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged, save where otherwise stated. Information about the European Topic Centre on Inland, Coastal and Marine Waters is available on the internet at: water.eionet.europa.eu. ISBN 978-3-944280-60-8 Author affiliation Lidija Globevnik, Luka Snoj, Gašper Šubelj – TC Vode, Slovenia EEA Project manager Blaž Kurnik, European Environment Agency, Denmark Editor Anita Künitzer – UFZ, Germany Reference to the report Globevnik, L., Snoj L., Šubelj, G., Kurnik, B., 2018, Outlook on Water and Climate Change Vulnerability in the Western Balkans, ed. Künitzer, A., ETC/ICM Technical Report 1/2018, Magdeburg: European Topic Centre on inland, coastal and marine waters, 86 pp.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2019 ENVIRONMENT and CLIMATE CHANGE with SET of RECOMMENDATIONS
    MONITORING REPORT ON CHAPTER 27- October 2019 ENVIRONMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE WITH SET OF RECOMMENDATIONS For period November 2018- October 2019 THIS PROJECT IS FUNDED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 GENERAL OVERVIEW AND ASSESMENT ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 HORIZONTAL LEGISLATION ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 10 Overview and the assessment grid................................................................................................................................................................................................10 Rationale ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment in the Sava River Basin
    PRELIMINARY FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT IN THE SAVA RIVER BASIN July, 2014 Date Document Revision History Document Author/Reviser 23 September 2013 Initial draft – sent to PEG FP for comments Secretariat/ PEG FP 17 December 2013 Draft 2 – sent to PEG FP for comments Secretariat/ V. Tusić, M. Babić Mladenović 30 January 2014 Draft 2.1 – reviewed at 23rd PEG FP meeting Secretariat/ PEG FP 20 March 2014 Draft 3 – sent to PEG FP for comments Secretariat/ V. Tusić, A. Bezdrob 14 April 2014 Draft 3.1 – sent as doc. for 24th PEG FP meeting Secretariat/ PEG FP 02 June 2014 Draft 4 – sent to PEG FP for comments Secretariat/ V. Tusić 10 June 2014 Draft 4.1 – sent to PEG FP for approval Secretariat/ PEG FP (no comments) 18 June 2014 Draft 5 – sent to ISRBC Secretariat/ ISRBC 01 July 2014 ISRBC accepted and approved publishing on web ISRBC International Sava River Basin Commission Kneza Branimira 29 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia T: + 385 1 488 69 60 F: + 385 1 488 69 86 [email protected] www.savacommission.org TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2 GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE SAVA RIVER BASIN .................................................................. 3 3 OVERALL APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................... 4 3.1 SLOVENIA ...........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]