October 2019 ENVIRONMENT and CLIMATE CHANGE with SET of RECOMMENDATIONS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

October 2019 ENVIRONMENT and CLIMATE CHANGE with SET of RECOMMENDATIONS MONITORING REPORT ON CHAPTER 27- October 2019 ENVIRONMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE WITH SET OF RECOMMENDATIONS For period November 2018- October 2019 THIS PROJECT IS FUNDED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 GENERAL OVERVIEW AND ASSESMENT ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 HORIZONTAL LEGISLATION ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 10 Overview and the assessment grid................................................................................................................................................................................................10 Rationale ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 11 Challenges ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 KEY RECCOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 13 II AIR QUALITY ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Overview and the assessment grid ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Rationale ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 15 CHALLENGES ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 KEY RECCOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 17 III WASTE MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 19 Overview and the assessment grid ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 19 Rationale ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 20 CHALLENGES ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 KEY RECCOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 IV WATER QUALITY ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 25 Overview and the assessment grid ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 25 Rationale ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 26 CHALLENGES ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 29 KEY RECCOMMENDATION .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 32 V NATURE PROTECTION ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 34 Overview and the assessment grid ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 35 Rationale ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 38 Challenges ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 41 RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 42 VI industrial pollution and risk management ............................................................................................................................................................................ 34 Overview and the assessment grid ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 45 Rationale ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 46 Challenges ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 47 KEY RECCOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 47 VII chemicals........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 48 Overview and the assessment grid ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 49 Rationale ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 49 Challenges ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 50 KEY RECCOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 50 VIII NOISE ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 51 Overview and the assessment grid ..........................................................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Nature Protection in the Legislative Framework in Montenegro
    13th COUNCIL OF EUROPE MEETING OF THE WORKSHOPS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN LANDSCAPE CONVENTION “Territories of the future, landscape identification and assessment: an exercise in democracy” Nature Protection in the legislative framework in Montenegro Marina Spahic, Directorate of Nature Protection General Directorate for Environmental Protection and Climate Change Legislation • The activity of nature protection in Montenegro is based on the : Law on Nature Protection ("Official Gazette of Montenegro", 51/08) Law on National Parks ("Official Gazette of Montenegro", 56/09). Draft Law on Amendments to the Law on Nature Protection was adopted by the Government on session held on 28 June 2012, which is now in the parliamentary procedure. • Draft Law on National Parks • Institutional framework • Ministry of Sustainable Development and Tourism • Environmental Protection Agency • Public Enterprise National Parks of Montenegro Clasification of protected areas • Special nature reserves • National Parks • Regional Parks⁄Parks of nature • Monuments of nature • Protected habitat • Landscapes of special natural characteristics (article 43) Declaration • Study of protection for the area • Parliament of Montenegro • Goverment of Montenegro • Local goverments • Register of Protected Areas Protected areas National parks – 7,77 % -Skadar lake-40.000 ha -Lovcen-6.400 ha -Durmitor-33.895 ha -Biogradska Gora- 5.400 ha -Prokletije-16.038 ha Monuments of Nature-0.987% Nature reserves- 0.047% Landscapes of special natural characteristic0.025% Territories
    [Show full text]
  • Drina River Basin Nexus Assessment - Phase II National Consultation Meeting KTH – Royal Institute of Technology: Emir Fejzić Youssef Almulla Dr
    Drina River Basin nexus assessment - Phase II National Consultation meeting KTH – Royal Institute of Technology: Emir Fejzić Youssef Almulla Dr. Vignesh Sridharan Dr. Francesco Gardumi 28/12/2020 National Consultation meeting 1 Agenda Key questions Scenarios Approach The river basin Preliminary results Hydro power plant cascade 28/12/2020 National Consultation meeting 2 Key questions to be addressed in Phase II • What role can renewables (hydro and non-hydro) in the Drina basin play in achieving the UNFCCC Nationally Determined Contributions? • What benefits does an increased share of non-hydro RES bring in terms of GHG emissions reduction and reduced stress on hydro power especially considering the need for flood containment measures. o To what extent may hydro power plants provide environmental services (e.g. environmental flows and flood control), and what impact does that have on their potential generation? • What are the effects of climate induced variability on hydropower generation? • What role could non-hydro RES play if the proposed plans for HPP development in the DRB are executed? • What effects can the Emission Trading Scheme, as part of the EU integration pathway, have on hydro and non-hydro RES development in the riparian countries? • In which way can hydro and non-hydro RES be impacted by the implementation of energy efficiency measures (demand- and supply-side)? 28/12/2020 National Consultation meeting 3 Scenarios proposed in Phase II • Reference scenario o Current policies, including INDC • Carbon pricing scenario o Effects
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping and Assessment Ecosystems and Their Services of Grassland and Forest in Montenegro (Project Title)
    ANNEX 5 TERMS OF REFERENCE Transfer of Czech Knowledge: Mapping and Assessment Ecosystems and their Services of Grassland and Forest in Montenegro (Project Title) Project Objectives: Czech Republic invested significant effort in quantifying what is the contribution of protected areas to national economy. During these processes undertaken by different institutions and organizations, several projects focused on mapping and assessing services provided by grassland and forests where implemented. These initiatives are contributing not only to disseminating the knowledge and understanding of value and importance of services provided by ecosystems but is directly contributing to global processes such as Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, The economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity etc). Taking in consideration that Montenegro is making first steps toward understanding and indorsing these initiatives and practice, through this project we would link these institutions with partner institutions from Montenegro, and establish linkages and partnerships that would be mutually beneficial. The main strength of the project would be focusing on learning by doing approach. Two pilot sites would be used as pilots for joint work of Czech and Montenegro experts in order to obtain detailed assessment of ecosystem services provided by forests and grasslands in these areas. Czech experience will be amended to fit Montenegro legal and development framework, and set of recommendations will be developed, based on experiences gained in PES schemes design in two pilot sites. Sites are predefined as area of Komovi and Piva Mountain massif. In these two areas UNDP CO Montenegro is working on establishment of two new protected areas (level of regional parks, category III as per IUCN categorization).
    [Show full text]
  • Support to Water Resources Management in the Drina River Basin
    Confluence of Lim River and Drina River, Republika Srpska, Bosnia & Herzegovina Summary of key facts related to HPPs in country reports Belgrade, January 25, 2016 Outlook on presentation • Electricity generation and consumption structure in Serbia • High voltage grid in Serbia • General situation of hydropower in Drina river basin • Existing hydropower plants in Drina river basin • Conceivable hydropower plants in Drina river basin • Recommendations 2 Production and consumption in Serbia 2010 2030 Production Consumption 3 Production and consumption in Bosnia 2010 2030 Consumption Origin of electricity 4 Production and consumption in Montenegro 2010 2030 Origin of electricity Consumption 5 High voltage grids Serbia Bosnia & Herzegovina Montenegro - Max. 400 kV - Max. 400 kV - Max. 400 kV - Ring structure - No ring structure - No ring structure - 6 links to foreign grids - 30 links to foreign grids - 11 links to foreign grids 6 Existing HPPs in Drina river basin SAVA 9 HPPs existing in Drina river basin DRINA CEHOTINA UVAC TARA PIVA LIM 7 Potential HPPs in Drina river basin 37 HPPs conceivably developable in Drina river basin 8 Existing / potential HPPs in Drina river basin Existing HPPs Conceivable HPPs BiH 1 + 2 BiH 9 + 7 Montenegro 1 Montenegro 17 Serbia 5 + 2 Serbia 4 + 7 Total 9 Total 37 1’964 MW Planned HPPs BiH 9 + 7 Montenegro 6 Serbia 3 + 7 Total 25 1’494 MW +76% power 9 Serbia – Present / conceivable HPPs • 2015: 7 HPPs in operation Total = 1’289 MW - Drina River : 2 HPPs Zvornik (96 MW), Bajina Basta HPP (368 MW) *) - Uvac River : 3 HPPs Radoinja (103 MW), Kokin Brod (21 MW), Uvac (36 MW) - Lim River : 1 HPPPotpeć (51 MW) - Pumped-storage PP Bajina Basta PSPP (614 MW) Environmental flow Up to 60 m3/s • 10 projects of new HPPs Total power 781 MW Total cost Ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Real-Time Flood Forecasting and Warning System Sava River Basin
    Development of Real-Time Flood Forecasting and Warning System for the Sava River Basin Klaas-Jan van Heeringen1, Hanneke Schuurmans2, Mihailo Anđelić3, Victor Simončić4, Imra Hodzic5, Sabina Hadziahmetovic5 ABSTRACT: Disastrous floods in May 2014 in Sava River basin resulted in 79 casualties and substantial economic damage in Croatia, Bosnia, Herzegovina, and Serbia. Assessments of the total damage in the area range up to 3.8 billion Euros. Distressing is the fact that besides flooding the Balkan region recently suffered from severe droughts as well. In order to be more resilient to flood and drought events, data and model output sharing is key. Better information will lead to better decisions. The Flood Forecasting and Warning System (Sava-FFWS) in which five countries jointly work together is at the forefront of transboundary cooperation. The FFWS, which is based on the well-known Delft-FEWS software, lends ample data and information enabling ultimately the decision makers to make right management decisions and implement operational measures to prevent and mitigate severe flood and drought situations on the basis of reliable forecasts of flows and discharges with a long lead time. The paper outlines key components of the Sava-FFWS illustrated with concrete application examples. Key words: real-time flood forecasting, Delft-FEWS, Sava river basin, Sava HIS, hydrological models, hydraulic models, numerical weather prediction, water levels, discharges, precipitation, temperature, snow, GIS data, dissemination Razvoj sistema za prognozu i upozorenje na velike vode u realnom vremenu za sliv reke Save APSTRAKT: Katastrofalne majske poplave iz 2014. godine u slivu reke Save pogodile su delove Bosne i Hercegovine, Hrvatske i Srbije i ostavile iza sebe pustoš: 79 osoba je izgubilo život a ogromna materijalna šteta je procenjena na preko 3.8 milijardi evra.
    [Show full text]
  • Capacity Assessment Report with Recommendation For
    List of abbreviations B&H Bosnia and Herzegovina CA Capacity Assessment CB Capacity Building CD Capacity Development IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature LGU Local Governmental Unit MARD Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development MSDT Ministry of Sustainable Development and Tourism MTMA Ministry of Transport and Maritime Affairs MNE Montenegro MU Management unit NEPA Nature and Environmental Protection Agency NGO Non Governmental Organization NPD National Park “Durmitor” NPS National Park “Sutjeska” PAs Protected Areas PENP Public Enterprise “National parks of Montenegro” ANNEXES ANNEX I QUESTIONNAIRE 2 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.OBJECTIVE AND PLANNED RESULTS .................................................................................................................................................................... 6 3. METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 4. ENABLING ENVIRONMENT ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Overview of institutions ..................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • STREAMS of INCOME and JOBS: the Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins
    STREAMS OF INCOME AND JOBS: The Economic Significance of the Neretva and Trebišnjica River Basins CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Highlights – The Value of Water for Electricity 5 Highlights – The Value of Water for Agriculture 8 Highlights – The Value of Public Water Supplie 11 Highlights – The Value of Water for Tourism 12 Conclusion: 13 BACKGROUND OF THE BASINS 15 METHODOLOGY 19 LAND USE 21 GENERAL CONTEXT 23 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR ELECTRICITY 29 Background of the Trebišnjica and Neretva hydropower systems 30 Croatia 33 Republika Srpska 35 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 37 Montenegro 40 Case study – Calculating electricity or revenue sharing in the Trebišnjica basin 41 Gap Analysis – Water for Electricity 43 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR AGRICULTURE 45 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 46 Croatia 51 Case study – Water for Tangerines 55 Case study – Wine in Dubrovnik-Neretva County 56 Case study – Wine in Eastern Herzegovina 57 Republika Srpska 57 Gap Analysis – Water for Agriculture 59 Montenegro 59 THE VALUE OF PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES 63 Republika Srpska 64 Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina 66 Montenegro 68 Croatia 69 Gap Analysis – Public Water 70 THE VALUE OF WATER FOR TOURISM 71 Croatia 72 CONCLUSION 75 REFERENCES 77 1st edition Author/data analysis: Hilary Drew With contributions from: Zoran Mateljak Data collection, research, and/or translation support: Dr. Nusret Dresković, Nebojša Jerković, Zdravko Mrkonja, Dragutin Sekulović, Petra Remeta, Zoran Šeremet, and Veronika Vlasić Design: Ivan Cigić Published by WWF Adria Supported by the
    [Show full text]
  • Odluka O Opštinskim I Nekategorisanim Putevima Na Teritoriji Glavnog Grada - Podgorice
    Odluka o opštinskim i nekategorisanim putevima na teritoriji Glavnog grada - Podgorice Odluka je objavljena u "Službenom listu CG - Opštinski propisi", br. 11/2009, 40/2015 i 34/2016. I OPŠTE ODREDBE Član 1 Ovom Odlukom se uređuje upravljanje, izgradnja, rekonstrukcija, održavanje, zaštita, razvoj i način korišćenja i finansiranja opštinskih i nekategorisanih puteva na teritoriji Glavnog grada - Podgorice (u daljem tekstu: Glavni grad). Član 2 Opštinski put je javni put namijenjen povezivanju naselja na teritoriji Glavnog grada, povezivanju sa naseljima u susjednim opštinama ili povezivanju djelova naselja, prirodnih i kulturnih znamenitosti, pojedinih objekata i slično na teritoriji Glavnog grada. Opštinski putevi su lokalni putevi, kao i ulice u naseljima. Opštinski putevi su putevi u opštoj upotrebi. Član 3 Nekategorisani put je površina koja se koristi za saobraćaj po bilo kom osnovu i koji je dostupan većem broju korisnika (seoski, poljski i šumski putevi, putevi na nasipima za odbranu od poplava, parkirališta i sl.). Nekategorisani putevi su u opštoj upotrebi, osim puteva koji su osnovno sredstvo privrednog društva ili drugog pravnog lica i puteva izgrađenih sredstvima građana na zemljištu u svojini građana. II ODREĐIVANjE OPŠTINSKIH I NEKATEGORISANIH PUTEVA Član 4 Prema značaju za saobraćaj i funkciji povezivanja u prostoru putevi na teritoriji Glavnog grada su kategorisani u: - opštinske puteve - lokalne puteve i ulice u naseljima i - nekategorisane puteve. Kategorizacija i način obilježavanja opštinskih puteva vrši se na osnovu mjerila za kategorizaciju koje utvrđuje Skupština Glavnog grada, posebnom odlukom. Kategorija planiranog opštinskog puta na osnovu mjerila iz prethodnog stava i propisa o uređenju prostora, određuje se planskim dokumentom Glavnog grada. Član 5 Odluku o određivanju i prekategorizaciji opštinskih i nekategorisanih puteva na teritoriji Glavnog grada donosi Skupština, shodno odluci iz člana 4 stav 2 ove odluke.
    [Show full text]
  • Cover Page RZS.Cdr
    REPUBLIKA CRNA GORA Zavod za statistiku REPUBLIC OF MONTENEGRO Statistical Office Popis stanovništva, domaæinstava i stanova u 2003. S T A N O V N I Š T V O NACIONALNA ILI ETNIÈKA PRIPADNOST Podaci po naseljima i opštinama Census of Population, Households and Dwellings 2003 P O P U L A T I O N NATIONAL OR ETHNIC AFFILIATION Data by settlements and municipalities 11 Podgorica, septembar 2004. REPUBLIKA CRNA GORA REPUBLIC OF MONTENEGRO Zavod za statistiku Statistical Office Popis stanovništva, domaćinstava i stanova u 2003. S T A N O V N I Š T V O NACIONALNA ILI ETNIČKA PRIPADNOST Podaci po naseljima i opštinama Census of Population, Households and Dwellings 2003 P O P U L A T I O N NATIONAL OR ETHNIC AFFILIATION Data by settlements and municipalities 11 Podgorica, septembar 2004. Izdaje: Published by: Zavod za statistiku Statistical Office of the Republic of Republike Crne Gore Montenegro IV Proleterske 2, Podgorica IV Proleterske 2, Podgorica Za izdavača: For the publisher: Ilija Stanišić, Director Ilija Stanišić, Director Glavni i odgovorni urednik: Editor-in-chief: Rajko Laković Rajko Laković Štampa: Printed by: Štamparija: Printing firm: Tiraž: Copies printed: 400 primjeraka 400 P R E D G O V O R U ovoj knjizi Zavod za statistiku Crne Gore objavljuje konačne rezultate popisa o nacionalnoj ili etničkoj pripadnosti stalnog stanovništva Republike Crne Gore, prema stanju na dan 31.oktobra 2003.godine. Podaci su iskazani po opštinama i naseljima, i to prema važećem administrativno-teritorijalnom stanju na dan 1.januar 2003.godine. U okviru Republike navedene su opštine prema azbučnom redosledu i tipu naselja, a u okviru svake opštine sva njena naselja prema azbučnom redosledu.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Bats (Chiroptera) in Montenegro
    Vespertilio 17: 129–156, 2014 ISSN 1213-6123 Distribution of bats (Chiroptera) in Montenegro Primož Presetnik1, Milan Paunović2, Branko karapandža3, Marina Đurović4, Čeda Ivanović5, Maša ždralević6, Petr BENDA7 & Ivana Budinski8 1 Centre for Cartography of Fauna and Flora, Ljubljana office, Klunova 3, SI–1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; [email protected] 2 Natural History Museum, Njegoševa 51, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; [email protected] 3 Wildlife Conservation Society “Mustela”, Njegoševa 51, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; [email protected] 4 Public Enterprise for National Parks of Montenegro, Put Radomira Ivanovića br 2, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro; [email protected] 5 Natural History Museum of Montenegro, Trg Vojvode Bećir Bega Osmanagića 6, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro; [email protected] 6 National Research Council, Institute of Biomembranes and Bioenergetics, Bari, Italy; [email protected] 7 Department of Zoology, National Museum (Natural History), Václavské nám. 68, 115 79 Praha 1 & Department of Zoology, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 44 Praha 2, Czech Republic; [email protected] 8 Department of Genetic Research, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, University of Belgrade, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11060 Belgrade, Serbia; [email protected] Abstract. The first detailed review of the distribution of bats in Montenegro is presented. Altogether 28 species were confirmed to occur in the country:Rhinolophus ferrumequinum (55 records), R. hippo- sideros (54), R. euryale (12), R. blasii (5), Myotis myotis (7), M. blythii (37), M. nattereri (12), M. emar- ginatus (12), M. mystacinus (12), M. alcathoe (1), M. brandtii (2), M. daubentonii (3), M. capaccinii (32), Vespertilio murinus (4), Eptesicus serotinus (7), Hypsugo savii (18), Pipistrellus pipistrellus (22), P.
    [Show full text]
  • Zakon O Teritorijalnoj Organizaciji Crne Gore ("Službeni List Crne Gore", Br
    Katalog propisa 2016 Prečišćeni tekst Zakona o teritorijalnoj organizaciji Crne Gore obuhvata sljedeće propise: 1. Zakon o teritorijalnoj organizaciji Crne Gore ("Službeni list Crne Gore", br. 054/11 od 17.11.2011), 2. Ispravka Zakona o teritorijalnoj organizaciji Crne Gore ("Službeni list Crne Gore", br. 026/12 od 24.05.2012), 3. Zakon o izmjeni i dopuni Zakona o teritorijalnoj organizaciji Crne Gore ("Službeni list Crne Gore", br. 027/13 od 11.06.2013), 4. Zakon o dopunama Zakona o teritorijalnoj organizaciji Crne Gore ("Službeni list Crne Gore", br. 062/13 od 31.12.2013), 5. Zakon o izmjenama i dopunama Zakona o teritorijalnoj organizaciji Crne Gore ("Službeni list Crne Gore", br. 012/14 od 07.03.2014), 6. Zakon o izmjenama i dopunama Zakona o teritorijalnoj organizaciji Crne Gore ("Službeni list Crne Gore", br. 003/16 od 15.01.2016), u kojima je naznačen njihov dan stupanja na snagu. ZAKON O TERITORIJALNOJ ORGANIZACIJI CRNE GORE ("Službeni list Crne Gore", br. 054/11 od 17.11.2011, 026/12 od 24.05.2012, 027/13 od 11.06.2013, 062/13 od 31.12.2013, 012/14 od 07.03.2014, 003/16 od 15.01.2016) I. OSNOVNE ODREDBE Član 1 Ovim zakonom uređuju se teritorijalna organizacija Crne Gore, uslovi, način i postupak teritorijalnog organizovanja i druga pitanja od značaja za teritorijalnu organizaciju. Član 2 Teritorija opštine, Glavnog grada, opštine u okviru Glavnog grada i Prijestonice (u daljem tekstu: jedinica lokalne samouprave) utvrđuje se ovim zakonom. Član 3 Teritorija jedinice lokalne samouprave i naziv opštine mogu se mijenjati u skladu sa ovim zakonom.
    [Show full text]
  • Smjernice Za Podnosioce Prijedloga Projekata
    Finansira Evropska unija SNAŽNI – Mediji bez mržnje i dezinformacija (Resilience – Civil Society for Media Free of Hate and Disinformation) WP3: Promocija medijske i informacione pismenosti u malim gradovima i ruralnim područjima na Zapadnom Balkanu Poziv za podnošenje prijedloga projekata Smjernice za podnosioce prijedloga projekata Rok za podnošenje Koncepta prijedloga projekata (Concept note): 14. oktobar 2020. godine, do 23:59. Nacionalni koordinator za dodjelu grantova: Institut za medije Crne Gore Ovaj dokument je napisan uz finansijsku podršku Evropske unije. Za sadržaj ovog dokumenta su odgovorni isključivo Mreža za profesionalizaciju medija Jugoistočne Evrope i Institut za medije Crne Gore i ni pod kojim okolnostima se ne može smatrati da izražava stavove Evropske unije. Sadržaj 1. Uvod 3 1.1. O projektu SNAŽNI-Mediji bez mržnje i dezinformacija 3 1.2. O smjernicama 3 2. Pravila Poziva za podnošenje prijedloga projekata 3 2.1. Ciljevi Poziva za podnošenje prijedloga projekata 3 2.2. Očekivani rezultati 3 2.3. Ko se može prijaviti? 4 2.4. Gdje bi projekti trebalo da budu sprovedeni i da ostvare rezultate? 4 2.5. Vrste aktivnosti koje mogu biti podržane 4 2.6. Dostupna budžetska sredstva i visina individualnog granta za podršku projektu 5 2.7. Trajanje projekata 5 2.8. Prihvatljivi i neprihvatljivi troškovi 5 3. Kako aplicirati? 6 3.1. Proces apliciranja u dva koraka 6 3.2. Aplikacioni paket 6 3.3. Kako popuniti prijavne formulare? 7 3.4. Info sesija i informaciona podrška 8 3.5. Gdje i kako podnijeti prijedloge projekata? 8 4. Evaluacija i proces odabira 8 4.1. Ocjena kvaliteta Koncepta prijedloga projekta (Concept note) 9 4.2.
    [Show full text]