DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix D: Cultural Resources Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix D: Cultural Resources Assessment APPENDIX D CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE CHANNEL 35 PROJECT, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Bureau of Engineering Environmental Management Group 1149 S. Broadway, Suite 600, Mail Stop 939 Los Angeles, California 90015-2213 Prepared by: AECOM 515 South Flower Street, 8th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Authors: Marc A. Beherec, Ph.D., R.P.A. Leesa Gratreak, M.S. Shoshana Jones, J.D., M.A. Jeremy Hollins, M.A. February 2016 Cultural Resources Assessment for The Channel 35 Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ 1 Chapter 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 3 Report Organization ....................................................................................................... 3 Project Location .............................................................................................................. 3 Project Description ......................................................................................................... 3 Regulatory Setting ......................................................................................................... 6 Chapter 2 Project Setting ....................................................................................................... 12 Environmental Setting .................................................................................................. 12 Cultural Setting ............................................................................................................. 12 Chapter 3 Archival Research.................................................................................................... 23 Archaeological Records Search ..................................................................................... 23 Chapter 4 Archaeological and Built Environment Survey ........................................................... 30 Methods ........................................................................................................................ 30 Results .......................................................................................................................... 30 Summary ....................................................................................................................... 43 Chapter 5 Management Recommendations ................................................................................ 45 Archaeological Recommendations ................................................................................. 45 Built Environment Recommendations ........................................................................... 45 Project Personnel .................................................................................................................. 50 References Cited .................................................................................................................... 51 APPENDICES A Native American Contact (Confidential) B DPR Forms (Confidential) February 2016 i Cultural Resources Assessment for The Channel 35 Project Executive Summary This document is the Cultural Resources Assessment for the Channel 35 Studio Relocation Project (Project) proposed by the City of Los Angeles Bureau of Engineering (LABOE). This document reports a Phase I cultural resources assessment conducted in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). LABOE proposes the design and construction of a new Digital Television Studio within the historic Masonic Hall and Merced Theater. In addition, LABOE proposes seismic retrofitting of the Pico House. The three buildings are adjacent to one another in an area bounded by the Los Angeles Plaza (Plaza), Sanchez Street to the east, North Main Street to the west, and Arcadia Street to the south. AECOM conducted archival research and completed surveys to identify cultural resources within the Project area. AECOM also conducted a cultural resources records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center housed at California State University, Fullerton. The records search revealed that the entirety of the Project area has been previously evaluated. All three buildings within the Project area are located within the Los Angeles Plaza Park Historic-Cultural Monument (LAHCM 64/2310) and are also contributing resources to the Los Angeles Plaza Historic District (also known as the El Pueblo de Los Angeles State Historic Park), which was listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) (NRIS 72000231) in 1972. In addition, one archaeological resource, P- 19-120014 is a historic refuse deposit in the Merced Theater building. Several other historical properties were also identified within 250 feet of the Project area. In compliance with Assembly Bill 52, AECOM contacted tribal parties interested about the Project. A letter was sent to the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) on April 14, 2015, to request a Sacred Lands File (SLF) search. The NAHC responded by fax on May 12, 2015. The NAHC identified nine Native American representatives who may have knowledge of the Project area. Each of these individuals was contacted by letter or email on April 20, 2015. Those who did not respond were contacted by phone on June 19, 2015. In the course of the follow-up calls, two individuals expressed concern about the Project. Both individuals recommended Native American monitors from their respective organizations. The Project is located in an area of high sensitivity for cultural resources. One archaeological resource, P- 19-120014, is located in the Merced Theater. Other, undocumented historic and prehistoric remains may exist within the Project area. The Project area is underlain by deep alluvial deposits dating to the last 10,000 years, and such deposits have the potential to contain significant archaeological resources. At the time of European contact, the Project area was occupied by the Gabrielino, who maintained a large village, Ya’angna, in the vicinity. The Gabrielino village was later the site of the historic Pueblo of Los Angeles, and the Project is within the boundaries of the original land grant for the pueblo. Under Spanish control, the Project vicinity grew into a thriving residential community and commercial center. Due to the long occupation of the Project vicinity from prehistoric to modern times, monitoring of ground-disturbing activities by a qualified archaeological monitor is recommended. An architectural history survey of the Merced Theater and Masonic Hall was completed by Mr. Jeremy Hollins on April 6, 2015, and the Pico House on September 24, 2015. Mr. Hollins meets the Secretary of Interior Professional Qualifications Standards (36 CFR Part 61) in the disciplines of Architectural History February 2016 1 Cultural Resources Assessment for The Channel 35 Project and History. The survey analyzed the current conditions, historic integrity, and retention of character- defining features, as well as compared the proposed Project plans with in-field observations and background information to complete the Project’s effects assessment. Within the Project area there are three previously recorded cultural resources: the Masonic Hall, Merced Theater, and Pico House. These properties are contributing resources to the NRHP-listed Los Angeles Plaza Historic District, and are listed as part of the Los Angeles Plaza Park Historic-Cultural Monument (LAHCM 64/2310). This assessment concludes the Project has been planned and designed consistent with the Secretary of Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. The Project will retain, restore, repair, and appropriately replace portions of the property from its period of significance that contribute to its historic integrity, while making other slight compatible alterations in non-character-defining features and spaces that preserve the property’s historical and architectural value. Therefore, under CEQA, the Project will have a less than significant impact to the three built environment historical resources (Masonic Hall, Merced Theater, and Pico House) in the Project area, since the improvements will be consistent with the Secretary of Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. February 2016 2 Cultural Resources Assessment for The Channel 35 Project Chapter 1 Introduction This document presents the results of a Phase I cultural resources assessment conducted for the Channel 35 Studio Relocation Project (Project) to be constructed by the City of Los Angeles Bureau of Engineering (LABOE). The Information Technology Agency has been working with LABOE to relocate the operations of Los Angeles City View Channel 35, the City’s public access television station. The Project will allow the City to relocate the public television station from its present private leased space to City- owned property, in conformance with the City’s asset management policy. This document was prepared in support of a Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21000 et seq., and the State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations Section 15000 et seq. Report Organization This report is organized following the Archaeological Resource Management Reports (ARMR): Recommended Contents and Format guidelines, Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR),
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) List City Declared Monuments
    Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) List City Declared Monuments No. Name Address CHC No. CF No. Adopted Community Plan Area CD Notes 1 Leonis Adobe 23537 Calabasas Road 08/06/1962 Canoga Park - Winnetka - 3 Woodland Hills - West Hills 2 Bolton Hall 10116 Commerce Avenue & 7157 08/06/1962 Sunland - Tujunga - Lake View 7 Valmont Street Terrace - Shadow Hills - East La Tuna Canyon 3 Plaza Church 535 North Main Street and 100-110 08/06/1962 Central City 14 La Iglesia de Nuestra Cesar Chavez Avenue Señora la Reina de Los Angeles (The Church of Our Lady the Queen of Angels) 4 Angel's Flight 4th Street & Hill Street 08/06/1962 Central City 14 Dismantled May 1969; Moved to Hill Street between 3rd Street and 4th Street, February 1996 5 The Salt Box 339 South Bunker Hill Avenue (Now 08/06/1962 Central City 14 Moved from 339 Hope Street) South Bunker Hill Avenue (now Hope Street) to Heritage Square; destroyed by fire 1969 6 Bradbury Building 300-310 South Broadway and 216- 09/21/1962 Central City 14 224 West 3rd Street 7 Romulo Pico Adobe (Rancho 10940 North Sepulveda Boulevard 09/21/1962 Mission Hills - Panorama City - 7 Romulo) North Hills 8 Foy House 1335-1341 1/2 Carroll Avenue 09/21/1962 Silver Lake - Echo Park - 1 Elysian Valley 9 Shadow Ranch House 22633 Vanowen Street 11/02/1962 Canoga Park - Winnetka - 12 Woodland Hills - West Hills 10 Eagle Rock Eagle Rock View Drive, North 11/16/1962 Northeast Los Angeles 14 Figueroa (Terminus), 72-77 Patrician Way, and 7650-7694 Scholl Canyon Road 11 The Rochester (West Temple 1012 West Temple Street 01/04/1963 Westlake 1 Demolished February Apartments) 14, 1979 12 Hollyhock House 4800 Hollywood Boulevard 01/04/1963 Hollywood 13 13 Rocha House 2400 Shenandoah Street 01/28/1963 West Adams - Baldwin Hills - 10 Leimert City of Los Angeles May 5, 2021 Page 1 of 60 Department of City Planning No.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Institutions and Activities, 1850-1980
    LOS ANGELES CITYWIDE HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities, 1850-1980 Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Office of Historic Resources November 2019 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 1 CONTRIBUTORS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Related Contexts and Evaluation Considerations 1 Other Sources for Military Historic Contexts 3 MILITARY INSTITUTIONS AND ACTIVITIES HISTORIC CONTEXT 3 Historical Overview 3 Los Angeles: Mexican Era Settlement to the Civil War 3 Los Angeles Harbor and Coastal Defense Fortifications 4 The Defense Industry in Los Angeles: From World War I to the Cold War 5 World War II and Japanese Forced Removal and Incarceration 8 Recruitment Stations and Military/Veterans Support Services 16 Hollywood: 1930s to the Cold War Era 18 ELIGIBILITY STANDARDS FOR AIR RAID SIRENS 20 ATTACHMENT A: FALLOUT SHELTER LOCATIONS IN LOS ANGELES 1 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities PREFACE These “Guidelines for Evaluating Resources Associated with Military Institutions and Activities” (Guidelines) were developed based on several factors. First, the majority of the themes and property types significant in military history in Los Angeles are covered under other contexts and themes of the citywide historic context statement as indicated in the “Introduction” below. Second, many of the city’s military resources are already designated City Historic-Cultural Monuments and/or are listed in the National Register.1 Finally, with the exception of air raid sirens, a small number of military-related resources were identified as part of SurveyLA and, as such, did not merit development of full narrative themes and eligibility standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Downtownla VISION PLAN
    your downtownLA VISION PLAN This is a project for the Downtown Los Angeles Neighborhood Council with funding provided by the Southern California Association of Governments’ (SCAG) Compass Blueprint Program. Compass Blueprint assists Southern California cities and other organizations in evaluating planning options and stimulating development consistent with the region’s goals. Compass Blueprint tools support visioning efforts, infill analyses, economic and policy analyses, and marketing and communication programs. The preparation of this report has been financed in part through grant(s) from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) through the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) in accordance with the provisions under the Metropolitan Planning Program as set forth in Section 104(f) of Title 23 of the U.S. Code. The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of SCAG, DOT or the State of California. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. SCAG shall not be responsible for the City’s future use or adaptation of the report. 0CONTENTS 00. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 01. WHY IS DOWNTOWN IMPORTANT? 01a. It is the birthplace of Los Angeles 01b. All roads lead to Downtown 01c. It is the civic, cultural, and commercial heart of Los Angeles 02. WHAT HAS SHAPED DOWNTOWN? 02a. Significant milestones in Downtown’s development 02b. From pueblo to urban core 03. DOWNTOWN TODAY 03a. Recent development trends 03b. Public infrastructure initiatives 04.
    [Show full text]
  • Central City Historic Districts, Planning Districts and Multi-Property Resources - 09/02/16
    Central City Historic Districts, Planning Districts and Multi-Property Resources - 09/02/16 Districts Name: Fifth Street Single-Room Occupancy Hotel Historic District Description: The Fifth Street Single-Room Occupancy Hotel Historic District is located in the area of Downtown Los Angeles that is known as both Central City East and Skid Row. The district is small in size and rectangular in shape. It includes parcels on the north side of Fifth Street between Gladys Avenue on the east and Crocker Street on the west. Within the district are 10 properties, of which 7 (70%) contribute to its significance. The district is composed primarily of Single-Room Occupancy (SRO) hotels that were constructed between 1906 and 1922, but also includes an office building that was constructed in 1922 and two examples of infill development that date to the postwar period. Buildings occupy rectangular parcels, are flush with the street, and rise between three and seven stories in height. Most are modest and architecturally vernacular, though some exhibit some subtle references to the Beaux Arts and Italianate styles. Common architectural features include brick and masonry exteriors, flat roofs, symmetrical facades, simple cornices and dentil moldings, and articulated belt courses. Some buildings also feature fire escapes. Common alterations include storefront modifications, the alteration or removal of parapets, and the replacement of original windows and doors. This stretch of Fifth Street adheres to the skewed rectilinear street grid on which most of Downtown Los Angeles is oriented. Streetscape features are limited, and consist of concrete sidewalks that are intermittently planted with sycamore and ficus trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Suggestions for Further Reading “The Pacific Circus.” Los Angeles Star
    Suggestions for further WE'D LOVE TO HEAR reading FROM YOU! “The Pacific Circus.” Los Angeles Star, Volume 5, Number 38, 2 February 1856. https://cdnc.ucr.edu/ Accessed 26 May 2020. Bell, Horace. Reminiscences of a Ranger: Early Times in Southern California. University of Oklahoma Press, 1999. Los Angeles Explorers Club Browne, J. Ross.The California Indians, a clever satire on the government's dealings with its Indian wards. Harper Brothers, laexplorersclub.com 1864. Dakin, Susanna Bryant. A Scotch Paisano: Hugo Reid's Life in California, 1832-1852, Derived from His Correspondence. Picturing Mexican America University of California Press, 1939. Estrada, William D. The Los Angeles Plaza : Sacred and Contested picturingmexicanamerica.com Space. University of Texas Press, 2008. - Faragher, John Mack. Eternity Street : Violence and Justice in Frontier Los Angeles. W.W. Norton & Company, 2016. We hope you had a great Franks, Joel. “California and the Rise of Spectator Sports, 1850- 1900.” Southern California Quarterly, vol. 71, no. 4, 1989, pp. 287– 310. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/41171452. Accessed 28 April time! 2020. D a i l y L i f e i n Hernandez, Kelly Lytle. City of Inmates: Conquest, Rebellion, and Thank you for riding along. the Rise of Human Caging in Los Angeles, 1771-1965. University of E a r l y L o s A n g e l e s North Carolina Press, 2017. Krythe, Maymie R. “Daily Life in Early Los Angeles.” The Historical A S e l f - G u i d e d Society of Southern California Quarterly, vol. 36, no.
    [Show full text]
  • VICKREY-BRUNSWIG BUILDING HABS CA-2798 (Brunswig Drug Company Complex) CA-2798 501 North Main Street Los Angeles Los Angeles California
    VICKREY-BRUNSWIG BUILDING HABS CA-2798 (Brunswig Drug Company Complex) CA-2798 501 North Main Street Los Angeles Los Angeles California PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA FIELD RECORDS HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, DC 20240-0001 HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY Name: VICKREY-BRUNSWIG BUILDING HABSNo. CA-2798 (Brunswig Drug Company Complex) Location: 501 North Main Street, corner of North Main Street and Republic Street, City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, California.1 The Vickrey- Brunswig Building faces southeast onto North Main Street and southwest onto Republic Street. The northwest side of the building shared a party wall with the Brunswig Annex, which was constructed in 1897 and demolished in 2007. U.S. Geological Survey Los Angeles Quadrangle, Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates: 11.385291 E; 3769295 N Present Owner / County of Los Angeles Occupant: Present Use: Vacant Significance: Designed by prominent Los Angeles architect Robert Brown Young, the Vickrey-Brunswig Building represents the rapid transformation of Los Angeles in the final quarter of the 19th century from an agricultural outpost during the Spanish and Mexican eras to a populous, commercialized city with increasing regional importance.2 The Vickrey-Brunswig Building was constructed in 1888 when the surrounding Plaza district shed its rural character and became the city's first central business district. The building reflects the continuous and evolving use of the 1825 site of the Spanish settlement of El Pueblo de Los Angeles, characterized as "the living 1 Los Angeles City Directories from 1888 through 1894 and Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps from 1888 (vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Connect Us Los Angeles Unon Station Master Plan
    ConnectUS Action Plan 5. Acknowledgements 2015 159 5. Acknowledgements Community Partner Institutions by Neighborhood Arts District Cornfield Arroyo Seco Grand Central Market Arts District Business Amigos de los Rios Grand Park Improvement District Center Theatre Group Higgins Building Homeowners Arts District Community Council Cornfield Farm Lab Association (ADCC/LA) EVOQ Properties Inc. Historic Downtown Los Angeles Cause Connect Business Improvement District FAMCO Investments Central City East Association (CCEA) Los Angeles Area Chamber Forest City West - Chinatown Los Angeles River and Arts Business of Commerce Friends of the Los Angeles River Association (LARABA) Los Angeles Conservancy Greater Cypress Park Mura Homeowner Association Los Angeles County Law Library Neighborhood Council Rothenberg Sawasy Architects (RSA) Los Angeles Police Department Homeboy Industries Savoy Homeowner Association Los Angeles Streetcar Inc. Lincoln Heights Chamber Southern California Institute of of Commerce Los Angeles Theater Company & Latino Architecture (SCI-Arc) Theater Company Lincoln Heights Neighborhood Council (LHNC) Music Center - Performing Arts Center of Los Angeles County Boyle Heights Los Angeles Conservation Corps Promenade West Homeowner Alliance for a Better Community Los Angeles County Arts Commission Association Boyle Heights Chamber of Commerce Los Angeles River Revitalization Ramon C. Cortines School for Visual Boyle Heights Historical Society Corporation (RRC) and Performing Arts Boyle Heights Neighborhood San Antonio Winery Council
    [Show full text]
  • 3.3. Cultural Resources
    Division 20 Portal Widening/Turnback Facility Project Draft EIR 3.3 Cultural Resources 3.3. CULTURAL RESOURCES This section identifies cultural and paleontological resources present within the Project Site, evaluates the potential project-related impacts on those resources, and provides mitigation measures, as applicable. The information provided herein is based on the results and recommendations contained in Appendix C Historic Resources Technical Memoranda, which includes the Historic Resources Technical Memorandum (C.1), Archaeological Resources Technical Memorandum (C.2), and Paleontological Resources Technical Memorandum (C.3). These appendix files include extensive sourcing and referencing of information used in this section. 3.3.1. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK Cultural and paleontological resources fall within the jurisdiction of several levels of government. The State and local jurisdictions provide the framework for the identification, documentation, and protection of such resources. CEQA, Section 5024 of the PRC, the City of Los Angeles Cultural Heritage Ordinance (Los Angeles Administrative Code Section 22.130), Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, and Section 5097.9 of the PRC are the primary laws that govern and affect the preservation of cultural resources of national, State, regional, and local significance. CEQA and Sections 5097.5 and 30244 of the PRC are the primary laws that govern the preservation of paleontological resources at the State level. 3.3.1.1. Federal National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) The National Park Service's NRHP is part of a national program to coordinate and support public and private efforts to identify, evaluate, and protect America's historic and archeological resources. To determine whether an undertaking could affect NRHP-listed or - eligible properties, cultural resources (including archaeological, historical, and architectural properties) must be inventoried and evaluated for listing in the NRHP.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles State Historic Park
    LOS ANGELES STATE HISTORIC PARK General Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report Approved by the State Park and Recreation Commission June10, 2005 Department Mission “To provide for the health, inspiration, and education of the people of California by helping to preserve the state’s extraordinary biological diversity, protecting its most valued natural and cultural resources, and creating opportunities for high-quality outdoor recreation.” The Mission sets the fundamental parameters within which the California Department of Parks and Recreation acquires, plans, and manages its more than 270 park units. For general information regarding this document, or to request additional copies, please contact: California State Parks Acquisition and Development Division P.O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 Copyright 2005 California State Parks. This publication, including all of the text and photographs, is the intellectual property of California State Parks and is protected by copyright. This page intentionally blank. LOS ANGELES STATE HISTORIC PARK General Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report State Clearinghouse #2003031096 Approved by the State Park and Recreation Commission June 10, 2005 ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER RUTH COLEMAN MIKE CHRISMAN Governor Director Secretary for Resources Department of Parks and Recreation P.O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 The Committee saw the Cornfield as a place to engage both nature and culture, to create a regional gathering space around the theme of a larger, more diverse L.A. history, which re- connected the city to the river. -- Cornfield State Park Advisory Committee Recommendations Report Sense of Place Who are Angelenos? What is Los Angeles? As noted historian Dr. Leonard Pitt stated, “No other available 32 acres holds as much opportunity to enlighten us about the history and culture of Los Angeles and this region…” The Park site and its surroundings have a sense of place rooted in a long history of settlement.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveyla Chinese American Historic Context Statement City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Office of Historic Resources
    SURVEYLA CHINESE AMERICAN HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING OFFICE OF HISTORIC RESOURCES PREPARED BY Marissa Moshier, Chattel, Inc. Shane Swerdlow, Chattel, Inc. Kathryn McGee, Chattel, Inc. Jenna Snow, Chattel, Inc. Erika Trevis, Chattel, Inc. Jenny Cho, Project Advisor Leslie Heumann, Project Advisor With contributions from Christine Company, SurveyLA Volunteer Hannah Fong, Office of Historic Resources Getty Intern Tim Rosenstein, Office of Historic Resources Intern Annie Tang, Office of Historic Resources Intern September 2013 Cover page photograph credits: Left: Chinese Women‟s Club, 1951 (Los Angeles Public Library) Center: New Chinatown, 2013 (City of Los Angeles Office of Historic Resources) Right: Chinese American Farmer in San Fernando Valley, 1917 (Los Angeles Public Library) Page ii Certified Local Government Grant Disclaimers The activity which is the subject of this historic context statement has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, Department of the Interior, through the California Office of Historic Preservation. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior or the California Office of Historic Preservation, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior or the California Office of Historic Preservation. This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color national origin, disability, or age in its federally assisted programs.
    [Show full text]
  • EXPLORING CHINATOWN Past and Present This Booklet Was Produced in Conjunction with a EDGED BETWEEN Tour Held on April 17, 2016
    EXPLORING CHINATOWN Past and Present This booklet was produced in conjunction with a EDGED BETWEEN tour held on April 17, 2016. Elysian Park to the Special thanks to those who so generously shared north, downtown to the their time and resources with the Conservancy: W George Yu, Xiayi Shirley Zhang, Tom L. Majich, south, and Lincoln Heights and Michael Kang, Michael Truong, Greg SooHoo, Echo Park to the east and west, Michael K. Woo, Wilson Tang, Barton Choy, Sum Los Angeles’ Chinatown spans a H. Shum, Michael Tiger, Richard Liu, Celeste Hong, Li Wei Yang, Eugene Moy, Pete Chinn, and little less than a mile. Along with iconic symbols of classical East Asia— the members of the Gee How Oak Tin Association tiled roofs, red lanterns, and wishing wells—exists the history of one of of L.A. A special thanks to the many loyal and dedicated Conservancy volunteers, without whom Los Angeles’ oldest neighborhoods. our tours would not be possible. The streets and parcels that formed the community’s center were Photo Credits: plotted in L.A.’s first official city survey in 1849, one year before L.A. Conservancy Archives: Page 9 California became a state. No other area of the city, except downtown, (vintage postcard) was mapped out before this location. Photographs taken in the mid- Eric Lynxwiler: Cover, Page 2 (Sincere Gifts & vintage postcard) to late nineteenth century show modest houses surrounded by wooden Larry Lytle/Museum of Neon Art: Page 5 fences, separating wide lots from their neighbors and the dusty road. (East Gate at night) Walt Mancini, Shades of L.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Clever Care Health Plan 2021 약국 디렉토리
    Clever Care Health Plan 2021 약국 디렉토리 본 약국 디렉토리는 2020 년 8 월 25 일에 업데이트된 것입니다. 최신 정보가 필요하거나 다른 질문이 있으시면 10 월 1 일부터 3 월 31 일까지는 매주 7 일 오전 8 시 ~ 오후 8 시, 4 월 1 일부터 9 월 30 일까지는 평일 오전 8 시 ~ 오후 8 시까지 1-833-388-8168(TTY: 711)번으로 Clever Care of Golden State 에 연락하시거나 clevercarehealthplan.com/formulary 를 방문하십시오. 수혜 기간에 이 약국 네트워크에 변동이 있을 수 있습니다. 최신 약국 디렉토리는 당사 웹사이트 clevercarehealthplan.com/pharmacy 에 수록되어 있습니다. 그리고 서비스 제공자에 관한 최신 정보는 멤버 서비스 센터에 문의해주십시오. H7607_21_CM0162D_KO_C 09252020 개요 이 소책자에서는 Clever Care Health Plan(HMO)의 네트워크에 포함된 약국 목록을 제시하고 있습니다. 처방 약품 조제에 관한 내용을 포함하여 귀하의 처방 약품 보장에 관한 자세한 설명이 필요하시면 보험 증명 및 Clever Care Health Plan 의 처방집을 참조하시기 바랍니다. 이 목록에 수록된 약국들과는 플랜 가입자들에게 처방 약품을 제공하기로 저희와 약속이 되어 있기 때문에 저희는 이 약국들을 ‘네트워크 약국’이라 부릅니다. 대부분의 경우, 귀하의 처방전은 이들 네트워크 약국 또는 당사의 우편 주문 약국 서비스를 통해서 조제하는 경우에만 Clever Care Health Plan 에서 보장해드립니다. 귀하의 처방 약품 구입을 위해 어느 약국에 한 번 방문했다 하여 계속 같은 약국에 가야하는 것은 아니고, 당사 네트워크 약국이면 어느 곳이든 원하는 곳으로 가실 수 있습니다. 네트워크에 속하지 않은 약국에서 처방 약품을 구입하는 경우에는 귀하의 보험 증명에 설명된 특정 조건에서만 보장을 해드립니다. 이 디렉토리에 모든 네트워크 약국이 다 수록된 것은 아닙니다. 이 디렉토리가 인쇄된 이후에도 약국을 추가 또는 제거할 수 있습니다. 이는 목록에 수록된 약국이 더 이상 당사 네트워크에 속하지 않을 수도 있고, 네트워크에 새로 가입된 약국이 목록에 없을 수도 있음을 의미합니다.
    [Show full text]