A Dynamic Approach to the Development of Lexicon and Syntax in a Second Language Chan, Belinda
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Groningen A dynamic approach to the development of lexicon and syntax in a second language Chan, Belinda IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2015 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Chan, B. (2015). A dynamic approach to the development of lexicon and syntax in a second language. [S.n.]. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 23-09-2021 127 Bibliography Al-Homoud, F. (2007). Vocabulary acquisition via extensive input. (Doctoral dis- sertation, University of Nottingham). Al-Homoud, F., & Schmitt, N. (2009). Extensive reading in a challenging envi- ronment. Language Teaching Research, 13 (4), 383-401. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1992). A second look at T-unit analysis: Reconsidering the sentence. TESOL Quarterly, 26 (2), 390-395. doi:10.2307/3587016 Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bofman, T. (1989). Attainment of syntactic and morpho- logical accuracy by advanced language learners. Studies in Second Language Ac- quisition, 11 (1), 17-34. doi:10.1017/S0272263100007816 Beheydt, L. (1987). The semantization of vocabulary in foreign language learning. System, 15 (1), 55-67. doi:10.1016/0346-251X(87)90048-0 Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K. (2011). Should we use characteristics of con- versation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45 (1), 5-35. Birkhoff, G.D. (1931). Proof of the ergodic theorem. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 17 (12), 656-660. Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (1994). Is written language production more difficult than oral language production? A working memory approach. International Jour- nal of Psychology, 29 (5), 591-620. 128 Bibliography Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (1996). Mode effects in a sentence production task. Current Psychology of Cognition, 15, 245-264. Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (2002). Even in adults, written production is still more costly than oral production. International Journal of Psychology, 37, 219-227. Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The Early Stages. Harvard University Press. Brown, R., Waring, R., & Donkaewbua, S. (2008). Incidental vocabulary acquisi- tion from reading, reading-while-listening, and listening to stories. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20 (2), 136-163. Bult´e,B. (2013). The development of complexity in second language acquisition: A dynamic systems approach. (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Brussels). Bult´e,B., & Housen, A. (2012). Defining and operationalising L2 complexity. In A. Housen, Kuiken, F. & Vedder, I. (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency (pp. 21-46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Byrnes, H., Maxim, H. H., & Norris, J. M. (2010). Realizing advanced foreign lan- guage writing development in collegiate education: Curricular design, pedagogy, assessment. The Modern Language Journal, 94,i-ii. Cameron, L., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2007). Complex systems and applied linguis- tics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17 (2), 226-239. doi:10.1111/j.1473- 4192.2007.00148.x Caspi, T. (2010). A dynamic perspective on second language development. (Doc- toral dissertation, University of Groningen). Caspi, T., & Lowie, W. (2013). The dynamics of L2 vocabulary development: A case study of receptive and productive knowledge. Revista Brasiliera De Lingu´ıstica Aplicada, 13 (2) Chambers, J. M., & Hastie, T. J. (1992). Statistical models in S. CA: Wadsworth & Brooks. Chan, H. (2010). Testing the effectiveness of computer assisted language learning Bibliography 129 website: WordChamp. (Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Groningen). Chan. H., Lowie. W. & de Bot. K. (in press). Input outside the classroom and vocabulary development: A dynamic perspective. In Reif, M. and J. Robinson. (Culture and Cognition in Bilingualism. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Ben- jamins) Chan, H., Lowie, W., & de Bot, K. (2014). A case study of lexical development of L2 writing and speaking in identical twins. Actes des 16`emesRencontres Jeunes Chercheurs en Sciences du Langage: Mod`eleset mod´elisation dans les sciences du langage (RJC 2013), 54-65. Chan, C., & Lee, L. (2013). Model-based unsupervised spoken term detection with spoken queries. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech & Language Process- ing, 21 (7), 1330-1342. Chang, W. (2006). English language education in Taiwan: A comprehensive sur- vey . [台c的ñ語Y²:現Á與省思] Bimonthly Journal of Educational Resources and Research, 69, 129-144. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger. Chomsky, N. (1996). Powers and prospects: Reflections on human nature and the social order. Boston: South End Press. Cooper, T. C. (1976). Measuring written syntactic patterns of second language learners of german. The Journal of Educational Research, 69 (5), 176-183. De Bot, K, de Quay-Peeters, P., & Evers, R. (2004). English proficiency in lower secondary education: A cross-national comparison: Final report. Department of Applied Linguistics, University of Nijmegen. De Bot, K. (2008). Introduction: Second language development as a dynamic process. The Modern Language Journal, 92 (2), 166-178. De Bot, K., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2011). A dynamic approach to second lan- guage development: Methods and techniques. In M. Verspoor, W. Lowie & K. 130 Bibliography de Bot (Eds.), Researching second language development from a dynamic systems theory perspective (pp. 5-24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. De Bot, K., Chan, H., Lowie, W., Plat, R., & Verspoor, M. (2012). A dynamic perspective on language processing and development. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1 (2), 188-218. De Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic system theory ap- proach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10 (1), 7-21. doi:10.1017/S1366728906002732 De Groot, A. (1993). Word-type effects in bilingual processing tasks: Support for a mixed-representational system. In R. Schreuder, & B. Weltens (Eds.), The bilingual lexicon (pp. 27-51). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Durrant, P., & Schmitt, N. (2010). Adult learners' retention of collocations from exposure. Second Language Research, 26 (2), 163-188. Dykstra-Pruim, P. (2003). Speaking, writing, and explicit rule knowledge: Toward an understanding of how they interrelate. Foreign Language Annals, 36 (1), 66-76. Edwards, R., & Collins, L. (2011). Lexical frequency profiles and zipf's law. Lan- guage Learning, 61 (1), 1-30. Ellis, N. (1998). Emergentism, connectionism, and language learning. Language Learning, 48 (4), 631-664. Ellis, N. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Lan- guage Acquisition, 24 (2), 143-188. Ellis, N. (2006a). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27 (1), 1-24. doi:10.1093/applin/ami038 Ellis, N. (2006b). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 27 (2), 164-194. Ellis, N., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009). Constructing a second language: Analyses and computational simulations of the emergence of linguistic constructions from Bibliography 131 usage. Language Learning, 59, 90-125. Ellis, R. & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analysing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Elman, J. L. (2004). An alternative view of the mental lexicon. Trends in Cogni- tive Sciences, 8 (7), 301-306. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M.C. Whit- trock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. (pp. 119-161). Old Tappan, NJ: Macmillan. Feng, A. (2012). Spread of English across greater China. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 33 (4), 363-377. Fiks, A., & Corbina, J. (1967). Course density and student perception. Language Learning, 17, 3-8. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1967.tb00906.x Fitzpatrick, T., & Izura, C. (2011). Word association in L1 and L2: An ex- ploratory study of response types, response times, and interlingual mediation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 373-398. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32 (4), 365-387. Fradd, S., & McGee, P. L. (1994). Instructional assessment: An integrative ap- proach to evaluating student performance. Reading: Addison-Wesley. Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2004). Why is conversation so easy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8 (1) 8-11. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.016 Garside, R. (1987). The CLAWS word-tagging system. In R. Garside, G. Leech & G. Sampson (Eds.), The computational analysis of english: A corpus-based ap- proach. (pp. 30-41). London: Longman. Garside, R., & Smith, N. (1997). A hybrid grammatical tagger: CLAWS4. In R. Garside, G. Leech & A. McEnery (Eds.), Corpus annotation: Linguistic informa- tion from computer text corpora.