A Dynamic Approach to the Development of Lexicon and Syntax in a Second Language Chan, Belinda

A dynamic approach to the development of lexicon and syntax in a second language Chan, Belinda

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date: 2015

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA): Chan, B. (2015). A dynamic approach to the development of lexicon and syntax in a second language. [S.n.].

Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

Download date: 23-09-2021 127

Bibliography

Al-Homoud, F. (2007). Vocabulary acquisition via extensive input. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham).

Al-Homoud, F., & Schmitt, N. (2009). Extensive reading in a challenging environment. Language Teaching Research, 13 (4), 383-401.

Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1992). A second look at T-unit analysis: Reconsidering the sentence. TESOL Quarterly, 26 (2), 390-395. doi:10.2307/3587016

Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bofman, T. (1989). Attainment of syntactic and morpho- logical accuracy by advanced language learners. Studies in Second Language Ac- quisition, 11 (1), 17-34. doi:10.1017/S0272263100007816

Beheydt, L. (1987). The semantization of vocabulary in foreign language learning. System, 15 (1), 55-67. doi:10.1016/0346-251X(87)90048-0

Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K. (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45 (1), 5-35.

Birkhoﬀ, G.D. (1931). Proof of the ergodic theorem. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 17 (12), 656-660.

Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (1994). Is written language production more diﬃcult than oral language production? A working memory approach. International Jour- nal of Psychology, 29 (5), 591-620. 128 Bibliography

Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (1996). Mode eﬀects in a sentence production task. Current Psychology of Cognition, 15, 245-264.

Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (2002). Even in adults, written production is still more costly than oral production. International Journal of Psychology, 37, 219-227.

Brown, R. (1973). A ﬁrst language: The Early Stages. Harvard University Press.

Brown, R., Waring, R., & Donkaewbua, S. (2008). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from reading, reading-while-listening, and listening to stories. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20 (2), 136-163.

Bult´e,B. (2013). The development of complexity in second language acquisition: A dynamic systems approach. (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Brussels).

Bulté,B., & Housen, A. (2012). Defining and operationalising L2 complexity. In A. Housen, Kuiken, F. & Vedder, I. (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency (pp. 21-46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Byrnes, H., Maxim, H. H., & Norris, J. M. (2010). Realizing advanced foreign language writing development in collegiate education: Curricular design, pedagogy, assessment. The Modern Language Journal, 94,i-ii.

Cameron, L., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2007). Complex systems and applied linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17 (2), 226-239. doi:10.1111/j.1473- 4192.2007.00148.x

Caspi, T. (2010). A dynamic perspective on second language development. (Doc- toral dissertation, University of Groningen).

Caspi, T., & Lowie, W. (2013). The dynamics of L2 vocabulary development: A case study of receptive and productive knowledge. Revista Brasiliera De Lingu´ıstica Aplicada, 13 (2)

Chambers, J. M., & Hastie, T. J. (1992). Statistical models in S. CA: Wadsworth & Brooks.

Chan, H. (2010). Testing the eﬀectiveness of computer assisted language learning Bibliography 129 website: WordChamp. (Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of Groningen).

Chan. H., Lowie. W. & de Bot. K. (in press). Input outside the classroom and vocabulary development: A dynamic perspective. In Reif, M. and J. Robinson. (Culture and Cognition in Bilingualism. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Ben- jamins)

Chan, H., Lowie, W., & de Bot, K. (2014). A case study of lexical development of L2 writing and speaking in identical twins. Actes des 16èmesRencontres Jeunes Chercheurs en Sciences du Langage: Modèleset modélisation dans les sciences du langage (RJC 2013), 54-65.

Chan, C., & Lee, L. (2013). Model-based unsupervised spoken term detection with spoken queries. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech & Language Process- ing, 21 (7), 1330-1342.

Chang, W. (2006). English language education in Taiwan: A comprehensive sur- vey . [台灣的英語教育:現況與省思] Bimonthly Journal of Educational Resources and Research, 69, 129-144.

Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.

Chomsky, N. (1996). Powers and prospects: Reﬂections on human nature and the social order. Boston: South End Press.

Cooper, T. C. (1976). Measuring written syntactic patterns of second language learners of german. The Journal of Educational Research, 69 (5), 176-183.

De Bot, K, de Quay-Peeters, P., & Evers, R. (2004). English proﬁciency in lower secondary education: A cross-national comparison: Final report. Department of Applied Linguistics, University of Nijmegen.

De Bot, K. (2008). Introduction: Second language development as a dynamic process. The Modern Language Journal, 92 (2), 166-178.

De Bot, K., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2011). A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques. In M. Verspoor, W. Lowie & K. 130 Bibliography de Bot (Eds.), Researching second language development from a dynamic systems theory perspective (pp. 5-24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

De Bot, K., Chan, H., Lowie, W., Plat, R., & Verspoor, M. (2012). A dynamic perspective on language processing and development. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1 (2), 188-218.

De Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic system theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10 (1), 7-21. doi:10.1017/S1366728906002732

De Groot, A. (1993). Word-type eﬀects in bilingual processing tasks: Support for a mixed-representational system. In R. Schreuder, & B. Weltens (Eds.), The bilingual lexicon (pp. 27-51). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Durrant, P., & Schmitt, N. (2010). Adult learners’ retention of collocations from exposure. Second Language Research, 26 (2), 163-188.

Dykstra-Pruim, P. (2003). Speaking, writing, and explicit rule knowledge: Toward an understanding of how they interrelate. Foreign Language Annals, 36 (1), 66-76.

Edwards, R., & Collins, L. (2011). Lexical frequency proﬁles and zipf’s law. Lan- guage Learning, 61 (1), 1-30.

Ellis, N. (1998). Emergentism, connectionism, and language learning. Language Learning, 48 (4), 631-664.

Ellis, N. (2002). Frequency eﬀects in language processing. Studies in Second Lan- guage Acquisition, 24 (2), 143-188.

Ellis, N. (2006a). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27 (1), 1-24. doi:10.1093/applin/ami038

Ellis, N. (2006b). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 27 (2), 164-194.

Ellis, N., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009). Constructing a second language: Analyses and computational simulations of the emergence of linguistic constructions from Bibliography 131 usage. Language Learning, 59, 90-125.

Ellis, R. & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analysing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Elman, J. L. (2004). An alternative view of the mental lexicon. Trends in Cogni- tive Sciences, 8 (7), 301-306.

Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M.C. Whit- trock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. (pp. 119-161). Old Tappan, NJ: Macmillan.

Feng, A. (2012). Spread of English across greater China. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 33 (4), 363-377.

Fiks, A., & Corbina, J. (1967). Course density and student perception. Language Learning, 17, 3-8. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1967.tb00906.x

Fitzpatrick, T., & Izura, C. (2011). Word association in L1 and L2: An exploratory study of response types, response times, and interlingual mediation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 373-398.

Flower, L., & Hayes, J. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32 (4), 365-387.

Fradd, S., & McGee, P. L. (1994). Instructional assessment: An integrative approach to evaluating student performance. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2004). Why is conversation so easy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8 (1) 8-11. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.016

Garside, R. (1987). The CLAWS word-tagging system. In R. Garside, G. Leech & G. Sampson (Eds.), The computational analysis of english: A corpus-based approach. (pp. 30-41). London: Longman.

Garside, R., & Smith, N. (1997). A hybrid grammatical tagger: CLAWS4. In R. Garside, G. Leech & A. McEnery (Eds.), Corpus annotation: Linguistic informa- tion from computer text corpora. (pp. 102-121). London: Longman. 132 Bibliography

Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, Interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to ar- gument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Granger, S., & Paquot, M. (2008). Disentangling the phraseological web. In S. Granger, & F. Meunier (Eds.), Phraseology: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 27-50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Green, P. J., & Silverman, B. W. (1994). Nonparametric regression and general- ized linear models: A roughness penalty approach. London: Chapman and Hall.

Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1981). Eﬀective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Hakuta, K. (1976). A case study of a Japanese child learning English as a second language. Language Learning, 26, 321-351.

Halliday, M. (1985). Spoken and written language. Voctoria: Deakin University Press.

Hayiou-Thomas, M. E. (2008). Genetic and environmental inﬂuences on early speech, language and literacy development. Journal of Communication Disorders, 41,397-408.

Herdina, P., & Jessner, U. (2002). A dynamic model of multilingualism: Perspec- tives of change in psycholinguistics. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Hill, M., & Laufer, B. (2003). Type of task, time-on-task and electronic dic- tionaries in incidental vocabulary acquisition. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 41 (2), 87-106. doi:10.1515/iral.2003.007

Homburg, T. J. (1984). Holistic evaluation of ESL compositions: Can it be vali- Bibliography 133 dated objectively? TESOL Quarterly, 18 (1), 87-107.

Hopper, P. (1998). Emergent grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (pp. 155-175). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hudelson, S. (1984). Kan yu ret an rayt en ingles: Children become literate in English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 18, 221-238.

Hulstijn, J. H. (1992). Retention of inferred and given word meanings: Exper- iments in incidental vocabulary learning. In P. J. Arnaud, & H. B’joint (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 113-125). London: Macmillan.

Hulstijn, J. (2000). Intentional and incidental second-language vocabulary learning: A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 258-286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hulstijn, J., & Hollander, M. (1996). Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students. Modern Language Journal, 80 (3), 327-339.

Hulstijn, J., & Laufer, B. (2001). Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51 (3), 539-558. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00164

Hunt, K. W. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. Na- tional council of Teachers of english.

Hunt, K. W. (1970). Do sentences in the second language grow like those in the ﬁrst? TESOL Quarterly, 4, 195-202.

Ishikawa, S. (1995). Objective measurement of low-proﬁciency EFL narrative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 51-69.

Jordan, G. (2004). Theory construction in second language acquisition. Amster- dam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Kameen, P. (1979). Syntactic skill and ESL writing quality. In C. Yorio, K. 134 Bibliography

Perkins & J. Schachter (Eds.), TESOL ’79: The learner in focus. (pp. 343-364). Washington, D.C.: TESOL.

Knight, S. (1994). Dictionary use while reading: The eﬀects on comprehension and vocabulary acquisition for students of diﬀerent verbal abilities. The Modern Language Journal, 78 (3), 285-299.

Krashen, S. D. (1981). The “fundamental pedagogical” principle in second language teaching.Studia Linguistica, 35 (1-2), 50-70.

Langacker, R. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (1976). Evidence of the need for a second language acquisition index of development. In W. Ritchie (Eds), Second language acquisition research: Issues and implications (pp. 127-136). New York: Academic Press.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (1978). An ESL index of development. TESOL Quarterly, 12 (4), 439-448. doi:10.2307/3586142

Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18 (2), 141-165. doi:10.1093/applin/18.2.141

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2002). Making sense of frequency. Studies in Second Lan- guage Acquisition, 24 (2), 275-285. doi:10.1017/S0272263102002127

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, ﬂuency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of ﬁve Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27 (4), 590-619. doi:10.1093/applin/aml029

Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Laufer, B. (1989). What percentage of text-lexis is essential for comprehension? Special language: From humans to thinking machines (pp. 316-323) Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Laufer, B. (2005). Focus on form in second language vocabulary learning. Eurosla Bibliography 135

Yearbook, 5, 223-250. doi:10.1075/eurosla.5.11lau

Laufer, B., & Paribakht, T. S. (1998). The relationship between passive and ac- tive vocabularies: Eﬀects of language learning context. Language Learning, 48 (3), 365-391. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00046

Laufer, B., & Rozovski-Roitblat, B. (2011). Incidental vocabulary acquisition: The eﬀects of task type, word occurrence and their combination. Language Teach- ing Research, 15 (4), 391-411. doi:10.1177/1362168811412019

Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge MA: Bradford Books.

Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-38.

Long, M. (1993). The assessment of SLA theories. Applied Linguistics, 14 (3), 225-249.

Lowie, W. (2013). Dynamic systems theory approaches to second language acquisition. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1-9). London: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Lowie, W., Caspi, T., van Geert, P., & Steenbeek, H. (2011). Modeling development and change. A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 22-122). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2011). The dynamics of multilingualism: Levelt’s speaking model revisited. In M. S. Schmid, & W. Lowie (Eds.), Moedling bilingualism: From structure to chaos. In honor of Kees de Bot. (pp. 267-288). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Lu, X. (2010). Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15 (4), 474-496. doi:10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu

Lu, X. (2012). The relationship of lexical richness to the quality of ESL learners’ oral narratives.The Modern Language Journal, 96 (2), 190-208. 136 Bibliography

MacWhinney, B. (2008). A uniﬁed model. In P. Robinson, & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. (pp. 341-371). New York: Routledge.

Malvern, D., & Richards, B. (2002). Investigating accommodation in language proﬁciency interviews using a new measure of lexical diversity. Language Testing, 19 (1), 85-104. doi:10.1191/0265532202lt221oa

Mason, C. (1971). The relevance of intensive training in English as a foreign language for university students. Language Learning, 21 (2), 197-204. doi:10.1111/j.1467- 1770.1971.tb00058.x

McCutchen, D. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 299-325.

McCutchen, D. (2000). Knowledge, processing, and working memory: Implica- tions for a theory of writing. Educational Psychologist, 35, 13-23.

McKee, G., Malvern, D., & Richards, B. (2000). Measuring vocabulary diversity using dedicated software. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 15 (3), 323-337. doi:10.1093/llc/15.3.323

Meara, P. (1980). Vocabulary acquisition: a neglected aspect of language learning. Retrieved from www.Lognotics.co.uk/library/meara1980.pdf

Meara, P. (2005). Lexical frequency proﬁles: A monte carlo analysis. Applied Linguistics, 26 (1), 32-47. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/amh037

Meara, P. (2012). The bibliometrics of vocabulary acquisition: An exploratory study. RELC Journal, 43 (1), 7-22.

Meara, P., & Miralpeix, I. (2004). V size. Retrieved from http://www.logno stics.co.uk

Meara, P., & Schmitt, N. (1997). Towards a new approach to modeling vocabulary acquisition. In N. Schmitt, & M. MacCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 109-121). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bibliography 137

Milton, J., & Hopkins, N. (2006). Comparing phonological and orthographic vocabulary size: Do vocabulary tests underestimate the knowledge of some learners? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63 (1), 127-147. doi:10.3138/cmlr.63.1.127

Naber, R., & Lowie, W. (2012). Hoe vroeger, hoe beter? een onderzoek naar de ef- fectiviteit van vroeg vreemdetalenonderwijs. Levende Talen Tijdschrift Jaargang, 13 (4), 13-21.

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63 (1), 59-82.

Nickerson, C. (2005). English as a lingua franca in international business contexts. English for Speciﬁc Purposes, 24, 367-380.

Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Eﬀectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50 (3), 417-528. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00136

Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA. Applied Linguistics, 30 (4), 555-578. doi:10.1093/applin/amp044

Novotney, S., Schwartz, R., & Ma, J. (2009). Unsupervised acoustic and language model training with small amounts of labelled data.Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2009. ICASSP 2009. IEEE International Conference on, 4297-4300.

Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proﬁciency. Applied Linguistics, 24 (4), 492-518.

Ortega, L., & Byrnes, H. (2008). Theorizing advancedness, setting up the longitudinal research agenda. New York, NY: Routledge.

Ortega, L. (forthcoming, 2012). Interlanguage complexity: A construct in search of theoretical renewal. In B. Szmrecsanyi & B. Kortmann (Eds). Linguistic complexity in interlanguage varieties, L2 varieties, and contact languages. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 138 Bibliography

Ortega, L (2014). Understanding second language acquisition. London: Hodder.

Oxford, R., & Ehrman, M. (1995). Adults’ language learning strategies in an intensive foreign language program in the united states. System, 23 (3), 359-386. doi:10.1016/0346-251X(95)00023-D

Park, A. S., & Glass, J. R. (2008). Unsupervised pattern discovery in speech. Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 16(1), 186-197.

Pellicer-Sanchez, A., & Schmitt, N. (2010). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from an authentic novel: Do things fall apart? Reading in a Foreign Language, 22 (1), 31-55.

Pigada, M., & Schmitt, N. (2006). Vocabulary acquisition from extensive reading: A case study. Reading in a Foreign Language, 18 (1), 1-28.

Plaza-Pust, C. (2008). Dynamic systems theory and universal grammar. Modern Language Journal, 92 (2), 250-269.

Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., McClearn, G. E., & McGuﬃn, P. (2008). Behavior genetics (5th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.

Polio, C. (1997). Measures of linguistic accuracy in second language writing research. Language Learning, 47 (1), 101-143.

Quinn, E., & Nation, I. S. P. (2007). Asian and Paciﬁc speed readings for ESL learners (English Language Institute Occasional Publication No.24 ed.). Welling- ton: SLALS Victoria University of Wellington.

Rabiner, L. R. (1989). A tutorial on hidden markov models and selected applica- tions in speech recognition. Proc. IEEE, 77 (2), 257-286.

Robinson, P. (2007). Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45 (3), 193-213. doi:10.1515/iral.2007.009

Ryan, M. S., & Nudd, G. R. (1993). The viterbi algorithm. (Technical Report No. RR–238). UK: Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick. Bibliography 139

Schmidt, R. (1990). The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.

Schmitt, D., Schmitt, N. & Mann, D. (2011) Focus on vocabulary: Bridging vocabulary. London: Longman.

Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt, & M. Mc- Carthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 199-227) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schmitt, N. (2004) Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing and use. Ams- terdam: John Benjamins.

Schmitt, N. (2008). Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12 (3), 329-363.

Schmitt, N., & Meara, P. (1997). Researching vocabulary through a word knowledge framework. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19 (1), 17-36.

Segal, N. L. (2010). Twins: The ﬁnest natural experiment. Personality and Indi- vidual Diﬀerences,49, 317-323.

Smiskova-Gustafsson, H. (2013). Formulaic Sequences in Second Language Acqui- sition. PhD thesis, University of Groningen.

Solecki, J. J. (1971). An intensive method of language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 4 (3), 278-282. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1971.tb02043.x

Spivey, J. M. (2007). The continuity of mind. USA: Oxford University Press.

Spoelman, M., & Verspoor, M. (2010). Dynamic patterns in development of accuracy and complexity: A longitudinal case study in the acquisition of Finnish. Applied Linguistics, 31 (4), 532-553.

Stromswold, K. (2006). Why aren’t identical twins identical? genetic, prenatal and postnatal factors. Cognition, 101, 333-384. 140 Bibliography

Tapia, E. (1993). Cognitive demand as a factor in interlanguage syntax: A study in topics and Texts. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University, Bloom- ington, IN.

Team, R. C. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Tomasello, M. (2001). Perceiving intentions and learning words in the second year of life. In M. Bowerman, & S. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and concep- tual development (pp. 132-156). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. MA: Harvard University Press.

Van Dijk, M., Verspoor, M., & Lowie, W. (2011). Variability and DST. In M. Verspoor, K. de Bot & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development (pp. 55-84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Van Geert, P. (1995). Growth dynamics in development. In R. F. Port, & T. J. Van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition. (pp. 313-338). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Van Geert, P. (2003). Dynamic systems approaches and modeling of developmental processes. In J. Valsiner, & K. J. Connolly (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 640-672). London, England: Sage.

Van Geert, P. (2004). Dynamic modelling of cognitive development: Time, situ- atedness and variability. In A. Demetriou, & A. Raftopoulos (Eds.), Emergence and transformation in the mind: Modelling and measuring cognitive change. (pp. 354-378). Mawah: Erlbaurm.

Van Geert, P. (2008). The dynamic systems approach in the study of L1 and L2 acquisition: An introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 92 (2), 179-199. Bibliography 141

Van Geert, P. (2011). The contribution of complex dynamic systems to development. Child Development Perspectives, 5 (4), 273-278.

Van Geert, P., & Steenbeek, H. (2005). Explaining after by before: Basic aspects of a dynamic systems approach to the study of development. Developmental Re- view, 25 (3-4), 408-442.

Van Geert, P., Steenbeek, H., & van Dijk, M. (2011). A dynamic model of expert- novice co-adaptation during language learning and acquisition. In M. S. Schmid, & W. Lowie (Eds.), Modeling bilingualism: From structure to chaos. In honor of Kees de Bot (pp. 235-266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Van Geert, P., & Van Dijk, M. (2002). Focus on variability: New tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data. Infant Behavior and Develop- ment, 25, 340-374.

Verhulst, P. F. (1845). Recherches mathématiquessur la loi d’accroissement de la population. Mémoires De L’AcadémieRoyale Des Sciences Et Des Belles-Lettres De Bruxelles, 18 (1), 1-45.

Verspoor, M., & Behrens, H. (2011). Dynamic systems theory and a usage-based approach to second language development. In M. Verspoor, W. Lowie & K. de Bot (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development : Methods and techniques (pp. 25-38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Verspoor, M., de Bot, K., & Lowie, W. (2011). A dynamic approach to second language development : Methods and techniques. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & Van Dijk, M. (2008). Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92 (2), 214-231. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00715.x

Verspoor, M., Schmid, M. S., & Xu, X. (2012). A dynamic usage based perspective on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21 (3), 239-263. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.007

Walters, J. D., & Bozkurt, N. (2009). The eﬀect of keeping vocabulary note- books on vocabulary acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 13 (4), 403-423. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362168809341509 142 Bibliography

Waring, R., & Takaki, M. (2003). At what rate do learners learn and retain new vocabulary from reading a graded reader? Reading in a Foreign Language, 15 (2), 130-163.

Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Weissberg, R. C., & Stuve, M. (1979). Diﬀerential gain rates in intensive ESL programs: Who gains the most? System, 7 (1), 61-65.

Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H. -. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of ﬂuency, accuracy, & complexity. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.

Wu, J. R. W. (2012). GEPT and English language teaching and testing in Taiwan. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9 (1), 11-25.

Xu, X. (2010). English language attrition and retention in Chinese and Dutch university students. (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Groningen).

Yu, G. (2010). Lexical diversity in writing and speaking task performances. Ap- plied Linguistics, 31 (2), 236-259.

Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The eﬀects of Pre-Task planning and On-Line planning on ﬂuency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24 (1), 1-27. doi:10.1093/applin/24.1.1

Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2005). The eﬀects of careful within-task planning on oral and written task performance. In R. Ellis (Eds.), Planning and task performance in a second language. (pp. 167-192). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Zahar, R., Cobb, T., & Spada, N. (2001). Acquiring vocabulary through reading: Eﬀects of frequency and contextual richness. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57 (3), 541-572. doi:10.3138/cmlr.57.4.541

Zhang, Y., & Glass, J. R. (2009). Unsupervised spoken keyword spotting via segmental DTW on gaussian posteriorgrams. Automatic Speech Recognition & Understanding, 2009. ASRU 2009. IEEE Workshop on, 398-403. Bibliography 143

Zipf, G. K. (1935). The psycho-biology of language. Boston: Houghton Miﬄin. 144 Bibliography