DOCSLIB.ORG

Kayton Estates Area Structure Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kayton Estates Area Structure Plan Kayton Estates Area Structure Plan April 1, 2019 Prepared for: Prepared for text Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. KAYTON ESTATES AREA STRUCTURE PLAN Bylaw X-2019 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 HISTORY ....................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.1 Public Consultation ....................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 INTERPRETATION ........................................................................................................ 1-2 1.2.1 Financial / Budgetary Considerations ........................................................... 1-2 2.0 SITE CONTEXT ............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 LOCATION ..................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 SITE CHARACTERISTICS ............................................................................................ 2-1 2.2.1 Natural Conditions ........................................................................................ 2-1 2.2.2 Existing and Surrounding Land Uses ........................................................... 2-2 2.2.3 Historical Resources ..................................................................................... 2-2 2.2.4 Oil and Gas Infrastructure ............................................................................ 2-2 2.2.5 Transportation Network ................................................................................ 2-3 2.2.6 Municipal Infrastructure ................................................................................ 2-4 2.2.7 Third-Party Utilities ....................................................................................... 2-4 3.0 POLICY CONTEXT ........................................................................................................ 3-5 3.1 MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT ACT ................................................................................. 3-5 3.2 MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN ............................................................................. 3-5 3.3 INTERMUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN .................................................................. 3-6 4.0 LAND USE CONCEPT .................................................................................................. 4-1 4.1 GENERAL PRINCIPLES ................................................................................................ 4-1 4.2 POLICY DIRECTION ..................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2.1 Country Residential ...................................................................................... 4-1 4.2.2 Recreational ................................................................................................. 4-2 4.2.3 Agricultural .................................................................................................... 4-2 4.2.5 Municipal and Environmental Reserves ....................................................... 4-3 4.2.7 Transportation .............................................................................................. 4-4 4.2.8 Water, Wastewater, and Stormwater Drainage ............................................ 4-4 4.2.9 Franchise/ Shallow Utilities ........................................................................... 4-5 4.2.10 Oil and Gas Infrastructure ............................................................................ 4-5 4.2.11 Phasing ......................................................................................................... 4-6 5.0 IMPLEMENTATION AND AMENDMENTS ................................................................... 5-1 5.1 IMPLEMENTATION ....................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 AMENDMENTS .............................................................................................................. 5-2 KAYTON ESTATES AREA STRUCTURE PLAN Bylaw X-2019 APPENDIX A FIGURES APPENDIX B TOWN OF SYLVAN LAKE LETTER APPENDIX C HISTORICAL RESOURCE ACT CLEARANCE APPENDIX D PUBLIC INFORMATION SESSION MATERIALS LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 - Location Plan Figure 2 - Existing Conditions Figure 3 - Drainage Figure 4 - Soil Conditions Figure 5 - Existing Land Use Designation Figure 6 - Natural Resources Figure 7 - Land Use Concept KAYTON ESTATES AREA STRUCTURE PLAN Bylaw X-2019 Section 1.0 Introduction 1.0 INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Kayton Estates Area Structure Plan (Kayton Estates ASP) is to provide a general land use planning framework and policies for NW 10-39-01-W5M (hereto referred to as the Plan Area). Although a portion of the Plan Area is already developed, this ASP will provide consistency and assurance throughout the Plan Area for future subdivision, development, or redevelopment. 1.1 HISTORY The development of the Plan Area has occurred largely in a fragmented manner beginning in 1962 with the subdivision of a 20-acre parcel located in the southwest corner of the property. In 1975 the remainder was subdivided in half, which in turn prompted interest in potential multi-lot residential development within the northern half of the quarter section. The development of the existing country residential subdivision (Kayton Estates) occurred in five separate phases over a period of approximately ten years beginning in 1992. All rezonings and subsequent subdivision applications were approved, under various circumstances, and all without an approved area structure plan in place to provide appropriate guidance or consideration of potential impacts on the existing transportation infrastructure. Since 2010, various landowners within Kayton Estates have expressed interest in resubdividing their larger 3-acre country residential lots into smaller 1 to 2-acre parcels in accordance with the Red Deer County Land Use Bylaw. To date, two lots have been resubdivided and a third resubdivision was recently considered for approval; however, it was denied by the County’s Municipal Planning Commission (MPC) on the grounds that an area redevelopment plan would first need to be adopted prior to any further resubdivisions of existing country residential lots. The County’s decision was appealed; however, the Municipal Government Board (MGB) denied the appeal. In its ruling (Board Order: MGB033/18) the Municipal Government Board stated, “an ASP is necessary at this point, to address transportation safety concerns caused by the potential for an increase in density in the quarter section… an ASP for the subject quarter section will provide planning information for future subdivision applications and allow for consultation with the surrounding municipalities.” 1.1.1 Public Consultation On March 21, 2019, a public open house was held at the Comfort Inn and Suites in Sylvan Lake to share information about the proposed Kayton Estates ASP with any interested parties. An advertisement for the event was placed in the Sylvan Lake newspaper, and a notice was place on the Lacombe County website in their news section. In addition to these methods of advertisement, the ASP applicant contacted existing Kayton Estates property owners personally. During the event, a formal PowerPoint presentation was made to give a comprehensive overview of the project’s history, proposed concept plan, and required planning process moving forward. A copy of the presentation and display boards used during the event can be found in Appendix D Public Information Session Materials. 1-1 KAYTON ESTATES AREA STRUCTURE PLAN Bylaw X-2019 Section 1.0 Introduction Attendance at the event was estimated around 10 with 8 individuals officially signing in. Attendees were comprised of Kayton Estates landowners, and those living in the nearby community of Jarvis Bay. In addition to the ASP applicant and Stantec consultants, representatives from Red Deer County were also present to field questions. Following the Public Information Session, formal feedback was gathered from 5 persons: 2 as submitted during the event and 3 after the event; all existing residents of Kayton Estates. All the feedback received has been included in Appendix D Public Information Session Materials for reference. As shown, the feedback supported the Kayton Estates ASP and future subdivision, when completed in alignment with the ASP. 1.2 INTERPRETATION Where the words “may”, “should”, “shall” are used in the Kayton Estates ASP they are to be interpreted as follows: “May” policies indicate support in principle with the required level of compliance to be determined by the applicable authority. “Should” policies mean compliance in principle is required but subject to the discretion of the applicable authority. “Shall” policies are mandatory and must be complied with. Council and Administration of Red Deer County shall endeavor to achieve the goals and objectives of the Kayton Estates ASP through the implementation of the Plan’s policies in all applicable planning, subdivision and development processes. 1.2.1 Financial / Budgetary Considerations The ASP includes policies that may require municipal funding to achieve successful implementation. In accordance with the Municipal Government Act, the Plan does not commit County Council to any future funding decisions. The funding for any future
Load more

Recommended publications
  • November 6Th, 2017 Council Chambers 4:30 P.M
    CITY OF BROOKS REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING – NOVEMBER 6TH, 2017 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 4:30 P.M. A G E N D A 1. AGENDA a) Items to add/delete from the agenda b) Adoption of agenda 2. MINUTES a) Regular Council Meeting – October 2nd, 2017 3. BUSINESS ARISING OUT OF MINUTES 4. CORRESPONDENCE AND INFORMATION a) Update - Council Conference and/or Workshops b) Quarterly Report - Safe Communities Committee 5. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 6. BUSINESS a) Proclamation for “National Children’s Day” (See letter dated October 17th, 2017 from Early Childhood Coalition) b) Proclamation for “Community Spirit Week” (See letter dated October 30th, 2017 from Brooks & District Diabetes Association) c) Proclamation for “Family Violence Prevention Week” (See letter from Brooks & County Victim Services Unit) d) Appointment to FCSS Board (See memo dated October 25th, 2017 from Deputy Chief Administrative Officer) e) 2017 Municipal General Election – Report to Council (See memo dated October 17th, 2017 from Deputy Chief Administrative Officer) -2- f) City of Brooks, County of Newell, The Governors of Medicine Hat College and Grasslands Public Schools – Partnership Agreement (See memo dated October 10th, 2017 from Deputy Chief Administrative Officer) g) Auditing Services RFP (See memo dated November 6th, 2017 from Manager of Finance) h) 2017 AUMA Resolutions (Mayor Morishita shall speak to this item) 7. PUBLIC HEARING 5:00 p.m. City of Brooks Bylaw – 17/13 Re: To amend the Land Use Bylaw, being Bylaw 14/12 - Call hearing to order - Explanation of proposed Bylaw - Persons speaking in favor of proposed Bylaw - Persons speaking in opposition of proposed Bylaw - Final Comments - Adjourn Hearing 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Highway 11 Functional Planning Study
    Website Link Introduction • Text to introduce link to storyboards and maps provided on host websites (Red Deer, Sylvan Lake, Eckville, Red Deer County, Lacombe County): Alberta Transportation is developing an interim plan for Highway 11, between Red Deer and Eckville to improve both traffic capacity and traffic safety. We want to hear what your concerns are. Please visit the on-line engagement link below to find out more information and add to the discussion: https://vertisee.mcelhanney.com/Highway11FPS/ Classification: Protected A Highway 11 Functional Planning Study Public Engagement (on-line) Round 2 February 2021 Classification: Protected A PROJECT OVERVIEW • Purpose: Identify intersection improvements to address interim and long-term mobility and safety issues while building towards the ultimate plan for Highway 11. • Study / Key intersections are: 1. Highway 766 (Eckville) 4. Highway 20 (Sylvan Lake) 2. Range Road 25A (Benalto Access) 5. Highway 781 (Sylvan Lake) 3. Range Road 15 (Sylvan Lake) 6. Burnt Lake Trail (Red Deer) Classification: Protected A HIGHWAY 11 RED DEER TO ECKVILLE – INTERIM PLAN FOR THE NEXT 20 YEARS • Development of Ultimate Interchanges can be delayed – reducing costs and impact to adjacent lands during this time • Current intersections (Highway 20 & Burnt Lake Trail) are nearing traffic capacity and are experiencing delays • Address and improve identified intersection safety concerns through the corridor • Construction of Highway 11 twinning south of Sylvan Lake in 2021 creates an opportunity to improve these
    [Show full text]
  • Blackfalds Intermunicipal Development Plan
    BLACKFALDS INTERMUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN ADOPTED: DATE DRAFT Blackfalds Intermunicipal Development Plan Page 1 Date Adopted: Date www.lacombecounty.com (403) 782-8389 [email protected] www.blackfalds.com (403) 555-4677 [email protected] For electronic copies of this document, please visit either municipality’s website. For paper copies of this DRAFTdocument, please contact either municipality directly. Blackfalds Intermunicipal Development Plan Page 2 Date Adopted: Date Table of Contents 1.0 - INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................. 6 1.2 Purpose ........................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Provincial Legislation ............................................................................................... 7 1.4 Planning Hierarchy .................................................................................................... 8 1.5 Policy Context .............................................................................................................. 8 1.6 Plan Area ......................................................................................................................... 9 1.7 Time Frame ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky View County and Kneehill County Intermunicipal Development Plan
    Bylaw 1805 Rocky View County and Kneehill County Intermunicipal Development Plan Revised September 12, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Dispute Resolution ......................................................................... 9 Definitions……………………………………………………10 Introduction……………………………………………………1 Purpose of the Plan ............................................................................. 1 Municipal Profiles…………………………………………..2 Rocky View County.............................................................................. 2 Kneehill County ................................................................................... 2 Legislative Requirements……………………………….2 Plan Area……………………………………………………….3 Plan Area Characteristics ................................................................ 3 Land Use Designations .................................................................... 4 Intermunicipal Land Use Policies……………………4 General Land Use Policies ................................................................... 4 Referrals .............................................................................................. 4 Agriculture .......................................................................................... 5 Resource Extraction & Renewable Energy Development ................... 6 Environmental & Open Spaces ........................................................... 6 Transportation .................................................................................... 7 Plan Administration & Implementation………….8 Intermunicipal Committee
    [Show full text]
  • Location and History Profile Lacombe County
    Location and History Profile Created on 9/24/2021 12:49:46PM Lacombe County Municipal Code: 0195 Location Description View Location Map (url to the pdf location map) Twp Rge Mer Longitude Latitude 40 26 W4 113°43' 52°27' Urban municipalities within the municipal boundary Town of Bentley Town of Blackfalds Town of Eckville Village of Alix Village of Clive Summer Village of Birchcliff Summer Village of Gull Lake Summer Village of Half Moon Summer Village of Bay Sunbreaker Cove Hamlets/urban service areas within the municipal boundary Haynes Joffre Mirror Morningside Tees Incorporation History Municipal Boundary Document Search (url to search results page of Annexation PDF's) Status: Municipal District Effective Date: May 17, 1995 Authority: Order in Council 383/95 Authority Date: May 17, 1995 Gazette: Jun 30, 1995, p. 1397 Comments: The name of the County of Lacombe No. 14 was changed to Lacombe County. Status: Municipal District Effective Date: January 01, 1961 Authority: Order in Council 1482/60 Authority Date: October 06, 1960 Gazette: Oct 15, 1960, p. 1611 Comments: The Municipal District of Lacombe No. 64 was formed into the County of Lacombe No. 14. Status: Municipal District Effective Date: April 01, 1945 Authority: Ministerial Order Authority Date: April 06, 1945 Gazette: Apr 14, 1945, p. 335 Comments: The Municipal District of Lacombe No. 398 was renumbered as the Municipal District of Lacombe No. 64. Numbers were changed for all municipal districts throughout the province. The Municipal Profiles are a compilation of statistical, financial, and other information about municipalities in the Province of Alberta .
    [Show full text]
  • The Beginning and the End – a Summer Holiday Experience
    The Beginning and the End – TT A Summer Holiday Experience BY TJARDA BARRA y husband rob and i, when saskatchewan border and ventured a then just before the confluence, a moose watching the red deer river few miles into saskatchewan where the crossed the river right in front of our flow by our home at the eastern red deer joins the south saskatchewan canoes. it was a perfect canadian scene: endM of red deer county, asked ourselves river. From a high lookout we gazed out water, moose, migrating geese overhead where the water comes from and where it at the confluence. What a magnificent and the glorious expanse of nature. is going. Hence, as a summer project, we sight: open rolling land divided by these We beached our canoes on a muddy decided to search out the beginning and two great rivers – the brownish shallow bank at the V-shaped confluence of the end of the red deer river. waters of the red deer meeting and the rivers for picture taking and then In late July last year we went on a mixing with the blue-green of the wider, continued for another 10 km on the much three-day hike in banff National Park and deeper south saskatchewan. there was deeper, wider and faster moving south stayed at skoki Lodge. On the second not a soul to be seen. Our only witnesses saskatchewan to estuary Ferry, our end day we set out for the five kilometre hike were the prairie wind, waving grasses, point of the day. to the headwaters of the red deer river.
    [Show full text]
  • Request for Proposal #06/18 Gasoline Alley Entrance Sign
    Addendum #1 - Request for Proposal #06/18 Gasoline Alley Entrance Sign 1. The concept “over the road” sign was sent to Alberta Transportation. Their comments can be summarized below: - A guideline for welcome signs published online at: http://www.transportation.alberta.ca/Content/docType233/Production/24Welcome_Sign.pdf - The brick base (shown on our sample sign) does not appear to be on breakaway. Please ensure that the base is outside the clear zone. To help with the clear zone assessment, the posted speed limit is 60km/hr at this location. - The entrance feature height needs to provide enough clearance for the tallest size vehicle that is approved to use the C-D Road. It should be designed to the same height as the overhead signs on provincial highways, which appears to be a 6m clearance requirement. Please refer to Page 32, Table 3.9 – Vertical Placement of Signs, Overhead Sign Type – On Dedicated Overhead Support such as a Sign Gantry: http://www.transportation.alberta.ca/Content/docType233/Production/Guide_info.pdf - The drawing does not illustrate any landscaping but if landscaping is proposed, it should consist of small shrubs and bushes (less than 100 mm base and 4 foot height at maturity) and it should be outside the clear zone. - Does the proposed entrance feature block the line of sight along the C-D Roadway? The brick base on the west side of the C-D road would have to meet clear zone requirements from both the C-D road and Hwy 2. The clear zone from Hwy 2 is over 10m with so taking into consideration all the requirements, Alberta Transportation wants to acknowledge that there’s a risk that the overhead banner sign may not be physically feasible or able to meet all the requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Communities Within Rural Municipal
    Communities Within Specialized and Rural Municipalities Updated December 31, 2013 Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: 780-427-2225 Fax: 780-420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] COMMUNITIES WITHIN SPECIALIZED AND RURAL MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES COMMUNITY STATUS MUNICIPALITY Abee Hamlet Thorhild County Acadia Valley Hamlet Municipal District of Acadia No. 34 ACME Village Kneehill County Aetna Hamlet Cardston County ALBERTA BEACH Village Lac Ste. Anne County Alcomdale Hamlet Sturgeon County Alder Flats Hamlet County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Aldersyde Hamlet Municipal District of Foothills No. 31 Alhambra Hamlet Clearwater County ALIX Village Lacombe County ALLIANCE Village Flagstaff County Altario Hamlet Special Areas Board AMISK Village Municipal District of Provost No. 52 ANDREW Village Lamont County Antler Lake Hamlet Strathcona County Anzac Hamlet Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo Ardley Hamlet Red Deer County Ardmore Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 Ardrossan Hamlet Strathcona County ARGENTIA BEACH Summer Village County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Armena Hamlet Camrose County ARROWWOOD Village Vulcan County Ashmont Hamlet County of St. Paul No. 19 ATHABASCA Town Athabasca County Atmore Hamlet Athabasca County Balzac Hamlet Rocky View County BANFF Town Improvement District No. 09 (Banff) BARNWELL Village Municipal District of Taber BARONS Village Lethbridge County BARRHEAD Town County of Barrhead No. 11 BASHAW Town Camrose County BASSANO Town County of Newell BAWLF Village Camrose County BEAUMONT Town Leduc County Beauvallon Hamlet County of Two Hills No. 21 Beaver Crossing Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 Beaver Lake Hamlet Lac La Biche County Beaver Mines Hamlet Municipal District of Pincher Creek No.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Deer County, Health Data and Summary, 4Th Editio
    Alberta Health Primary, Community and Indigenous Health Community Profile: Red Deer County excluding the City of Red Deer Health Data and Summary 4th Edition, December 2019 Alberta Health December 2019 Community Profile: Red Deer County excluding the City of Red Deer Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. i Community Profile Summary .............................................................................................................. iii Zone Level Information ........................................................................................................................... 1 Map of Alberta Health Services Central Zone ........................................................................................... 2 Population Health Indicators ...................................................................................................................... 3 Table 1.1 Zone versus Alberta Population Covered as at March 31, 2018 .............................................. 3 Table 1.2 Health Status Indicators for Zone versus Alberta Residents, 2013 and 2014 (Body Mass Index, Physical Activity, Smoking, Self-Perceived Mental Health)……………………………................3 Table 1.3 Zone versus Alberta Infant Mortality Rates (per 1,000 live births), Years 2016 – 2018…….. .. 4 Community Mental Health ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Living in Red Deer County: a Guide for New Residents INTRODUCTION
    Living in Red Deer County: A Guide for New Residents INTRODUCTION The quality of life in Red Deer County is among the best found anywhere in the world. However, life in the country is different in a number of ways from life in the city. Rural governments normally provide a different type of service than that provided in urban areas. The following information is provided to help you make an educated and in- formed decision when choosing to purchase or develop land outside the boundaries of incorporated cities, towns or villages. AGRICULTURE Red Deer County is largely an agricultural area. Much of the rural land is actively used for growing crops, feeding livestock and providing lumber and mineral resources. Owning rural land means knowing how to care for it. Here are some points to consider: 1. Agriculture is an important business in Red Deer County. Choosing to live in the country means choosing to live among the farms and ranches of our rural countryside, and accepting the normal day-to-day operations of agri- business neighbors. The County will not intervene with these normal day-to-day operations unless there is a valid reason. 2. Farmers often work around the clock, especially during planting and harvest time. Dairy operators sometimes milk without stopping and hay is often swathed or baled at night. Low-flying planes and crop duster planes may fly overhead during irregular hours. On occasion, it is possible that adjoining agricultural uses may disturb your peace and quiet. 3. Land preparation and other operations can cause dust, especially during windy and dry weather.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Resiliency and Restoration Program Maps
    VU32 VU33 VU44 VU36 V28A 947 U Muriel Lake UV 63 Westlock County VU M.D. of Bonnyville No. 87 18 U18 Westlock VU Smoky Lake County 28 M.D. of Greenview No. 16 VU40 V VU Woodlands County Whitecourt County of Barrhead No. 11 Thorhild County Smoky Lake Barrhead 32 St. Paul VU County of St. Paul No. 19 Frog Lake VU18 VU2 Redwater Elk Point Mayerthorpe Legal Grande Cache VU36 U38 VU43 V Bon Accord 28A Lac Ste. Anne County Sturgeon County UV 28 Gibbons Bruderheim VU22 Morinville VU Lamont County Edson Riv Eds er on R Lamont iver County of Two Hills No. 21 37 U15 I.D. No. 25 Willmore Wilderness Lac Ste. Anne VU V VU15 VU45 r Onoway e iv 28A S R UV 45 U m V n o o Chip Lake e k g Elk Island National Park of Canada y r R tu i S v e Mundare r r e Edson 22 St. Albert 41 v VU i U31 Spruce Grove VU R V Elk Island National Park of Canada 16A d Wabamun Lake 16A 16A 16A UV o VV 216 e UU UV VU L 17 c Parkland County Stony Plain Vegreville VU M VU14 Yellowhead County Edmonton Beaverhill Lake Strathcona County County of Vermilion River VU60 9 16 Vermilion VU Hinton County of Minburn No. 27 VU47 Tofield E r i Devon Beaumont Lloydminster t h 19 21 VU R VU i r v 16 e e U V r v i R y Calmar k o Leduc Beaver County m S Leduc County Drayton Valley VU40 VU39 R o c k y 17 Brazeau County U R V i Viking v e 2A r VU 40 VU Millet VU26 Pigeon Lake Camrose 13A 13 UV M U13 VU i V e 13A tt V e Elk River U R County of Wetaskiwin No.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Meeting Agenda
    Council Meeting Agenda November 27, 2018 9:00 a.m. 262075 ROCKY VIEW POINT ROCKY VIEW COUNTY, AB T4A 0X2 PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD AT THE NEW COUNTY HALL: 262075 Rocky View Point, Rocky View County, AB CALL MEETING TO ORDER UPDATES/ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA A CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 1. November 13, 2018 Council Meeting Page 4 2. November 15, 2018 Special Council Meeting Page 10 B FINANCIAL REPORTS - None C APPOINTMENTS/PUBLIC HEARINGS NOTE: As per Section 606(2)(a) of the Municipal Government Act, the Public Hearings were advertised in the Rocky View Weekly on October 30, 2018 and November 6, 2018. MORNING APPOINTMENTS 10:00 A.M. 1. Division 9 – File: PL20180114 – Bylaw C-7839-2018 – Road closure to consolidate a portion of Parcel ‘B’ as shown on Plan 8732 H.X. Staff Report Page 16 2. Division 6 – File: PL20180053 (08515005/08515008/08515010) – Bylaw C- 7828-2018 – Redesignation Item – Redesignation for Agricultural Purposes Staff Report Page 30 D GENERAL BUSINESS 1. All Divisions – File: 6070-175 – PPC Recommendations for Fall 2018 Regional Recreation Funding Applications Staff Report Page 50 AGENDA Page 1 of 379 Council Meeting Agenda November 27, 2018 9:00 a.m. 262075 ROCKY VIEW POINT ROCKY VIEW COUNTY, AB T4A 0X2 2. All Divisions – File: 6060 – Fall 2018 District Community Recreation Funding Grant: Capital Funding Requests Staff Report Page 59 3. Division 9 – File: 1006-600 – Fall 2018 Friends of Westbrook School Capital Funding Application Staff Report Page 107 4. Division 5 – File: 1012-370 – Terms of Reference – Conrich Area Structure Plan Future Policy Area Review Staff Report Page 119 5.
    [Show full text]