DOCSLIB.ORG

Communities Within Specialized and Rural Municipalities (May 2019)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Communities Within Specialized and Rural Municipalities (May 2019) Communities Within Specialized and Rural Municipalities Updated May 24, 2019 Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: 780-427-2225 Fax: 780-420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] COMMUNITIES WITHIN SPECIALIZED AND RURAL MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES COMMUNITY STATUS MUNICIPALITY Abee Hamlet Thorhild County Acadia Valley Hamlet Municipal District of Acadia No. 34 ACME Village Kneehill County Aetna Hamlet Cardston County ALBERTA BEACH Village Lac Ste. Anne County Alcomdale Hamlet Sturgeon County Alder Flats Hamlet County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Aldersyde Hamlet Foothills County Alhambra Hamlet Clearwater County ALIX Village Lacombe County ALLIANCE Village Flagstaff County Altario Hamlet Special Areas Board AMISK Village Municipal District of Provost No. 52 ANDREW Village Lamont County Antler Lake Hamlet Strathcona County Anzac Hamlet Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo Ardley Hamlet Red Deer County Ardmore Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 Ardrossan Hamlet Strathcona County ARGENTIA BEACH Summer Village County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Armena Hamlet Camrose County ARROWWOOD Village Vulcan County Ashmont Hamlet County of St. Paul No. 19 ATHABASCA Town Athabasca County Atmore Hamlet Athabasca County Balzac Hamlet Rocky View County BANFF Town Improvement District No. 09 (Banff) BARNWELL Village Municipal District of Taber BARONS Village Lethbridge County BARRHEAD Town County of Barrhead No. 11 BASHAW Town Camrose County BASSANO Town County of Newell BAWLF Village Camrose County Beauvallon Hamlet County of Two Hills No. 21 Beaver Crossing Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 Beaver Lake Hamlet Lac La Biche County Beaver Mines Hamlet Municipal District of Pincher Creek No. 9 Beaverdam Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 BEAVERLODGE Town County of Grande Prairie No. 1 Beazer Hamlet Cardston County BEISEKER Village Rocky View County May 24, 2019 Page 1 of 16 COMMUNITY STATUS MUNICIPALITY Bellis Hamlet Smoky Lake County Benalto Hamlet Red Deer County Benchlands Hamlet Municipal District of Bighorn No. 8 BENTLEY Town Lacombe County BERWYN Village Municipal District of Peace No. 135 BETULA BEACH Summer Village Parkland County Bezanson Hamlet County of Grande Prairie No. 1 BIG VALLEY Village County of Stettler No. 6 Bindloss Hamlet Special Areas Board BIRCH COVE Summer Village Lac Ste. Anne County Bircham Hamlet Kneehill County BIRCHCLIFF Summer Village Lacombe County BITTERN LAKE Village Camrose County BLACK DIAMOND Town Foothills County BLACKFALDS Town Lacombe County Blackfoot Hamlet County of Vermilion River Blackie Hamlet Foothills County Blue Ridge Hamlet Woodlands County Bluesky Hamlet Municipal District of Fairview No. 136 Bluffton Hamlet Ponoka County Bodo Hamlet Municipal District of Provost No. 52 BON ACCORD Town Sturgeon County BONDISS Summer Village Athabasca County BONNYVILLE BEACH Summer Village Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 BONNYVILLE Town Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 Botha Hamlet County of Stettler No. 6 Bottrel Hamlet Rocky View County Bow City Hamlet County of Newell BOW ISLAND Town County of Forty Mile No. 8 BOWDEN Town Red Deer County BOYLE Village Athabasca County Bragg Creek Hamlet Rocky View County Brant Hamlet Vulcan County BRETON Village Brazeau County Breynat Hamlet Athabasca County Brosseau Hamlet County of Two Hills No. 21 Brow nfield Hamlet County of Paintearth No. 18 Brow nvale Hamlet Municipal District of Peace No. 135 Bruce Hamlet Beaver County BRUDERHEIM Town Lamont County Brule Hamlet Yellowhead County Buck Creek Hamlet Brazeau County Buck Lake Hamlet County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 BUFFALO LAKE METIS SETTLEMENT Metis Settlement Smoky Lake County Buford Hamlet Leduc County Burdett Hamlet County of Forty Mile No. 8 May 24, 2019 Page 2 of 16 COMMUNITY STATUS MUNICIPALITY BURNSTICK LAKE Summer Village Clearwater County Busby Hamlet Westlock County Byemoor Hamlet County of Stettler No. 6 Cadogan Hamlet Municipal District of Provost No. 52 Cadomin Hamlet Yellowhead County Cadotte Lake Hamlet Northern Sunrise County Calahoo Hamlet Sturgeon County Calling Lake Hamlet Municipal District of Opportunity No. 17 CALMAR Town Leduc County Campsie Hamlet County of Barrhead No. 11 CANMORE Town Municipal District of Bighorn No. 8 Canyon Creek Hamlet Municipal District of Lesser Slave River No. 124 CARBON Village Kneehill County Carbondale Hamlet Sturgeon County Cardiff Hamlet Sturgeon County CARDSTON Town Cardston County CARMANGAY Village Vulcan County CAROLINE Village Clearwater County Carseland Hamlet Wheatland County CARSTAIRS Town Mountain View County Carvel Hamlet Parkland County Carw ay Hamlet Cardston County Caslan Hamlet Athabasca County Cassils Hamlet County of Newell CASTLE ISLAND Summer Village Lac Ste. Anne County CASTOR Town County of Paintearth No. 18 Cayley Hamlet Foothills County CEREAL Village Special Areas Board Cessford Hamlet Special Areas Board CHAMPION Village Vulcan County Chancellor Hamlet Wheatland County CHAUVIN Village Municipal District of Wainwright No. 61 Cheadle Hamlet Wheatland County Cherhill Hamlet Lac Ste. Anne County Cherry Grove Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 Chin Hamlet Lethbridge County Chinook Hamlet Special Areas Board CHIPMAN Village Lamont County Chisholm Hamlet Municipal District of Lesser Slave River No. 124 Clairmont Hamlet County of Grande Prairie No. 1 Clandonald Hamlet County of Vermilion River CLARESHOLM Town Municipal District of Willow Creek No. 26 Cleardale Hamlet Clear Hills County CLIVE Village Lacombe County Cluny Hamlet Wheatland County CLYDE Village Westlock County May 24, 2019 Page 3 of 16 COMMUNITY STATUS MUNICIPALITY COALDALE Town Lethbridge County COALHURST Town Lethbridge County Cochrane Lake Hamlet Rocky View County COCHRANE Town Rocky View County Colinton Hamlet Athabasca County Collingw ood Cove Hamlet Strathcona County Compeer Hamlet Special Areas Board Condor Hamlet Clearwater County Conklin Hamlet Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo Conrich Hamlet Rocky View County CONSORT Village Special Areas Board CORONATION Town County of Paintearth No. 18 COUTTS Village County of Warner No. 5 COWLEY Village Municipal District of Pincher Creek No. 9 Craigmyle Hamlet Starland County CREMONA Village Mountain View County CROSSFIELD Town Rocky View County CRYSTAL SPRINGS Summer Village County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Cynthia Hamlet Brazeau County CZAR Village Municipal District of Provost No. 52 Dalemead Hamlet Rocky View County Dalroy Hamlet Rocky View County Dapp Hamlet Westlock County DAYSLAND Town Flagstaff County De Winton Hamlet Foothills County DeBolt Hamlet Municipal District of Greenview No. 16 Dead Man's Flats Hamlet Municipal District of Bighorn No. 8 Deadw ood Hamlet County of Northern Lights Del Bonita Hamlet Cardston County Delacour Hamlet Rocky View County DELBURNE Village Red Deer County DELIA Village Starland County Demmitt Hamlet County of Grande Prairie No. 1 Derw ent Hamlet County of Two Hills No. 21 Desert Blume Hamlet Cypress County DEVON Town Leduc County DEWBERRY Village County of Vermilion River Diamond City Hamlet Lethbridge County Dickson Hamlet Red Deer County DIDSBURY Town Mountain View County Dimsdale Hamlet County of Grande Prairie No. 1 Dixonville Hamlet County of Northern Lights DONALDA Village County of Stettler No. 6 Donatville Hamlet Athabasca County DONNELLY Village Municipal District of Smoky River No. 130 Dorothy Hamlet Special Areas Board May 24, 2019 Page 4 of 16 COMMUNITY STATUS MUNICIPALITY DRAYTON VALLEY Town Brazeau County DUCHESS Village County of Newell Duffield Hamlet Parkland County Duhamel Hamlet Camrose County Dunmore Hamlet Cypress County Duvernay Hamlet County of Two Hills No. 21 Eaglesham Hamlet Birch Hills County EAST PRAIRIE METIS SETTLEMENT Metis Settlement Big Lakes County ECKVILLE Town Lacombe County EDBERG Village Camrose County EDGERTON Village Municipal District of Wainwright No. 61 EDSON Town Yellowhead County Edw and Hamlet Smoky Lake County Egremont Hamlet Thorhild County ELIZABETH METIS SETTLEMENT Metis Settlement Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 ELK POINT Town County of St. Paul No. 19 Ellscott Hamlet Athabasca County Elmw orth Hamlet County of Grande Prairie No. 1 ELNORA Village Red Deer County EMPRESS Village Special Areas Board Enchant Hamlet Municipal District of Taber Endiang Hamlet County of Stettler No. 6 Enilda Hamlet Big Lakes County Ensign Hamlet Vulcan County Entw istle Hamlet Parkland County Erskine Hamlet County of Stettler No. 6 Etzikom Hamlet County of Forty Mile No. 8 Evansburg Hamlet Yellowhead County Exshaw Hamlet Municipal District of Bighorn No. 8 Fabyan Hamlet Municipal District of Wainwright No. 61 Fairview Hamlet Lethbridge County FAIRVIEW Town Municipal District of Fairview No. 136 FALHER Town Municipal District of Smoky River No. 130 Fallis Hamlet Parkland County Falun Hamlet County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Faust Hamlet Big Lakes County Faw cett Hamlet Westlock County FERINTOSH Village Camrose County FISHING LAKE METIS SETTLEMENT Metis Settlement Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 Flatbush Hamlet Municipal District of Lesser Slave River No. 124 Fleet Hamlet County of Paintearth No. 18 FOREMOST Village County of Forty Mile No. 8 FORESTBURG Village Flagstaff County Fort Assiniboine Hamlet Woodlands County Fort Chipew yan Hamlet Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo Fort Kent Hamlet Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 May 24, 2019 Page 5 of 16 COMMUNITY STATUS MUNICIPALITY Fort MacKay Hamlet Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo FORT MACLEOD Town Municipal
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sturgeon County
    Paddle 2030 75813 River 13472 75108 13621 STURGEON COUNTY 74066 76283 70033 Rg 03 13645 7186 Rg 0274628 81608 Rg 01 77297 Rg 27 Rg 26 7575 76776 71753 Rg 25 Cr Rg 24 9323 13842 2 Rg 23 Rg 22 Lunnford75551 71286 Rg 21 Rg 20 74856 76297 79267 72642 Rg 19 75550 246Redwater 63 Rg 18 73659 75943 74263 8136 654 Wabash 76488 9157 8982 8437 1991 78586 71828 70044 827 Smoky 75013 7538 78063 71584 13809 70724 72948 Fairydell 75129 9660 73227 Newton 81148 72947 77862 71285 8089 8787 73601 78004 Redwater Halfmoon L 7106 6737 9975 849 6578 7105 6775 13183 75974 73343 1219 6609 6783 13742 75132 13629 7644644 8586 74823 71583 6846 9169 R 9092 Egremont 13816 75426 8587 78758 9770 76445 79381 74801 777 Fawn 8828 71253 2097 8769 Tp 58 74622 72388 9880 73571 6724 72803 70043 7026775015 80808 6795 70025 Lake 9124 1422 13648 Cr 70501 Waugh 70266 7338 13190 2139 6503 1078 7482 75316 1993 78593 7585 78806 7436 78847 71034 7437 75975 Manola 76830 72393 81135 7483678992 76891 74972 8430 74130 74397 80796 Tp 58 75186 9126 829 72394 75304 1830 73146 70002 71033 75156 Kerensky 74235 74971 7104 9433 74096 13628 77044 28 Newton L 13843 73344 73219 9481 77993 80831 7821 77645 71724 1805 1931 Cranes L 7451 13589 74467 2023 76437 Opal 72807 7191 77644 9431 80623 78067 81476 7695 75468 8514 7802 73994 613 75692 75553 33 75626 614 George L 76486 75219 70398 78923 7822 71594 7439 Eldorena 6600 808 70312 Highridge Pickardville 2297 74095 7216 79318 Cr 9661 7507 73057 1086 Redwater 77992 Cr 75281 Carley 74469 74803 Jct.
    [Show full text]
  • Placing the Cardston Temple in Early Mormon Temple Architectural History
    PLACING THE CARDSTON TEMPLE IN EARLY MORMON TEMPLE ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY By Amanda Buessecker A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Arts Degree in Art History Carleton University May 2020 Supervisor: Peter Coffman, Ph.D. Carleton University ii Abstract: The Cardston temple of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints represents a drastic shift in temple architecture of the early Mormon faith. The modern granite structure was designed not to show a mere difference of aesthetic taste, but as an embodiment of the evolving relationship between the Mormon pioneers and the American government. Earlier temples, erected in the nineteenth century throughout the valleys of Utah, were constructed by Mormon pioneers at a time when the religious group desired to separate themselves from the United States physically, politically, and architecturally. When the temple was built in Cardston, Alberta (1913-1923), it was a radical departure from its medievalist predecessors in Utah. The selected proposal was a modern Prairie-school style building, a manifestation of Utah’s recent interest in integrating into American society shortly after being admitted to the Union as a state in 1896. iii Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 Part I: A Literature Review ........................................................................................................ 5 A Background for Semiotics .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Guide
    Municipal Guide Planning for a Healthy and Sustainable North Saskatchewan River Watershed Cover photos: Billie Hilholland From top to bottom: Abraham Lake An agricultural field alongside Highway 598 North Saskatchewan River flowing through the City of Edmonton Book design and layout by Gwen Edge Municipal Guide: Planning for a Healthy and Sustainable North Saskatchewan River Watershed prepared for the North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance by Giselle Beaudry Acknowledgements The North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance would like to thank the following for their generous contributions to this Municipal Guide through grants and inkind support. ii Municipal Guide: Planning for a Healthy and Sustainable North Saskatchewan Watershed Acknowledgements The North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance would like to thank the following individuals who dedicated many hours to the Municipal Guide project. Their voluntary contributions in the development of this guide are greatly appreciated. Municipal Guide Steering Committee Andrew Schoepf, Alberta Environment Bill Symonds, Alberta Municipal Affairs David Curran, Alberta Environment Delaney Anderson, St. Paul & Smoky Lake Counties Doug Thrussell, Alberta Environment Gabrielle Kosmider, Fisheries and Oceans Canada George Turk, Councillor, Lac Ste. Anne County Graham Beck, Leduc County and City of Edmonton Irvin Frank, Councillor, Camrose County Jolee Gillies,Town of Devon Kim Nielsen, Clearwater County Lorraine Sawdon, Fisheries and Oceans Canada Lyndsay Waddingham, Alberta Municipal Affairs Murray Klutz, Ducks
    [Show full text]
  • Brazeau County
    BRAZEAU COUNTY COUNCIL MEETING April 17, 2018 VISION: Brazeau County fosters RURAL VALUES, INNOVATION, CREATIVITY, LEADERSHIP and is a place where a DIVERSE ECONOMY offers QUALITY OF LIFE for our citizens. MISSION: A spirit of community created through INNOVATION and OPPORTUNITIES GOALS 1) Brazeau County collaboration with Canadians has created economic opportunity and prosperity for our community. That we intentionally, proactively network with Canadians to bring ideas and initiative back to our citizens. 2) Brazeau County has promoted and invested in innovation offering incentives diversifying our local economy, rural values and through opportunities reducing our environmental impact. Invest in green energy programs, water and waste water upgrades, encourage, support, innovation and economic growth through complied LUB, promoting sustaining small farms, hamlet investment/redevelopment. 3) Brazeau County is strategically assigning financial and physical resources to meet ongoing service delivery to ensure the success of our greater community. Rigorous budget and restrictive surplus process, petition for government funding, balance budget with department goals and objectives. 4) Brazeau County has a land use bylaw and framework that consistently guides development and promotes growth. Promotes development of business that is consistent for all “open for business.” Attract and retain businesses because we have flexibility within our planning documents. 5) Come to Brazeau County to work, rest and play. This encompasses all families. We have the diversity to attract people for the work opportunities. We have recreation which promotes rest and play possibilities that are endless. 6) Brazeau County is responsive to its citizenship needs and our citizens are engaged in initiatives. Engage in various levels - website, Facebook, newspapers, open houses.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall Newsletter 2020
    2020 FALL NEWSLETTER COUNTY OF WETASKIWIN NO. 10 Mailing: Box 6960 Wetaskiwin, AB T9A 2G5 Physical: 243019A HWY 13 Phone: 780-352-3321 Fax: 780-352-3486 Website: www.county.wetaskiwin.ab.ca Facebook: facebook.com/wetaskiwincounty Strong Proactive Leadership | Safe Progressive Communities C O U N C I L All Councillor Area Codes are 780 Page 2------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------www.county.wetaskiwin.ab.ca message FROm ReeVe jOsh bishOp At the Organizational Meeting held on October 27, 2020 I was elected as Reeve for the next year. It is an honour and privilege to serve the County in my new role. COVID-19 UPDATE COVID-19 cases continue to rise in our region. On November 12, 2020, the County of Wetaskiwin moved to Enhanced Status. If you wish to receive notification of when the County moves in and out of enhanced status sign-up at www.alberta.ca/covid-19-status-notification.aspx. The County wants to encourage everyone to continue to follow the guidelines and mandates of Alberta Health Services including staying home if you are sick, avoiding crowds, socializing safely, maintaining physical distancing, wearing a mask when in public, and washing your hands frequently. Please visit https://www.alberta.ca/coronavirus-info-for-albertans.aspx for the most up to date COVID numbers, restrictions and guidelines. OIL & GAS ASSESSMENT MODEL REVIEW UPDATE We have faced many challenges this year. One of the most significant was the Government of Alberta’s proposed oil & gas assessment model review. The provincial government’s original proposal would have drastically reduced the assessment of oil and gas wells and pipelines throughout the province.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Highlights
    Council Highlights Regular Council Meeting | March 10, 2020 Delegation: Plamondon District Community It asks the Governments of Canada and Alberta Rural Municipalities Association (RMA) Development Society’s 2020 Operating Request to consider and evaluate the financial impacts on Emergent Resolution: Physician Funding municipalities to distribute potable water and Framework The Plamondon District Community Development treat wastewater. It also requests that the Society (PDCDS) prepared their operating budget Governments of Canada and Alberta establish At Council’s request, Administration prepared and grant request for 2020. Their budget identifies long-term funding that considers the rising costs an emergent resolution for the upcoming Rural $433,200 in total operating expenses, with a grant of providing these services due to federal and Municipalities of Alberta (RMA) Convention. It request of $395,925 because the organization’s provincial laws and regulations. resolves as follows: revenues of $37,265 offset their operational costs. Council supported the resolution, and it will be Therefore, be it resolved that the Rural Ms. Lori Tarrant and Mr. Cory St. Jean presented to considered by the AUMA membership in the fall. Municipalities of Alberta urge the Government Council with more information at today’s meeting of Alberta to reengage in negotiations with on PDCDS’ request. Council thanked them for Intermunicipal Collaboration Framework: the Alberta Medical Association to mutually their presentation, and will consider their request Athabasca County and Lac La Biche County arrive at a new master agreement to ensure at a future meeting. the sustainability of continued timely access to Intermunicipal Collaboration Frameworks (ICFs) rural healthcare by all rural Albertans.
    [Show full text]
  • A Prevalence Study of Multiple Sclerosis in the Crowsnest Pass Region of Southern Alberta
    A Prevalence Study of Multiple Sclerosis in the Crowsnest Pass Region of Southern Alberta G.M. Klein, M.S. Rose and T.P. Seland Abstract: Reports of a high prevalence rate for multiple sclerosis in Southern Alberta led to an epidemiologic study of this disease in the Crowsnest Pass and Cardston regions. In Cardston, the prevalence rate for multiple sclerosis was 88 per 100,000. In the Crowsnest Pass, the prevalence rate was 217 per 100,000. Previous epidemiologic studies of the prevalence rate of multiple sclerosis in Western Canada have shown rates between 93 and 111 per 100,000. Two prevalence studies of multi­ ple sclerosis in Barrhead County, Alberta and Westlock County, Alberta show prevalence rates of 196 and 201 per 100,000. The prevalence rate in the Crowsnest Pass is comparable to the prevalence in Barrhead County and Westlock County, Alberta. However, there is no statistically significant differ­ ence between prevalence rates in the Cardston and Crowsnest Pass regions and our overall feeling is that the results of studies of small populations should be interpreted with caution. Resume: Etude de prevalence de la sclerose en plaques dans la region de Crowsnest Pass dans le sud de I'Alberta. Une etude epidfimiologique de la sclerose en plaques (SEP) dans le sud de I'Alberta a 6t6 entrepnse a la suite de rapports faisant etat d'une prevalence 61evee de cette maladie dans la region de Crowsnest Pass et de Cardston. Dans Cardston, le taux de prevalence de la SEP etait de 88 par 100,000 habitants. Dans Crowsnest Pass, le taux de prevalence etait de 217 par 100,000 habitants.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 08 19 RFD Re PREDA Funding
    TOWN OF PEACE RIVER Request for Decision To: Mayor & Council Date: August 19, 2020 Presenter: Christopher Parker, CAO Prepared By: R. McCuaig Topic: Proposed PREDA Membership Fee Change File No.: 64/111 Attachments: Rate Comparisons Issue Peace Regional Economic Development Alliance (PREDA) has passed a motion to make changes to their fee structure. The Town of Peace River has been invited to present a Special Resolution at the September 18, 2020 Annual General Meeting to propose an alternate fee structure. Background On July 27, 2020, Administration presented Council with PREDA’s proposed resolution and provided some suggested alternate models. Council’s decision was that PREDA consider additional funding options – instead of a singular per capita option – to be presented to the PREDA members to vote on. PREDA has since adopted a funding model of $.75 per capita. PREDA has invited the Town to propose alternate funding models via Special Resolution. Any proposed funding model must: 1. Be revenue neutral in that it must provide the budgeted funding level of the per capita model. This funding amount is currently $56,767.50. 2. Accommodate an agreed cap on contributions by the County of Grande Prairie. This cap is set at $17,000. Administration has prepared two alternate funding models which meet these requirements. Current Model The existing funding rate was based on anticipated funding from other levels of government. This funding has been reduced. The rank rating reflects the proportion of cost burden borne by that municipality. Current
    [Show full text]
  • Maps of Land Cover and Soil Type in the Red Deer River Basin May, 2014
    RED DEER RIVER BASIN FLOOD MITIGATION STUDY Appendix D – Maps of land cover and soil type in the Red Deer River Basin May, 2014 Appendix D – MAPS OF LAND COVER AND SOIL TYPE IN THE RED DEER RIVER BASIN nh \\cd1206-f09\shared_projects\113929356-rd_river_basin\07_reports_studies\rpt_red_deer_river_basin_mitigation_study_2014-05-21.docx D.1 County Of Wetaskiwin No. 10 «¯ 20 Bluffton 53 Rimbey Parkland Ponoka Camrose Bashaw Beach County County Leedale White Clive Tees 50 Mirror Sands 12 Bentley Alix Sunbreaker Blackfalds Withrow Cove Lacombe Nevis Eckville Half Joffre County Moon Bay Haynes Condor 11 Benalto Sylvan Lake Red Deer Ardley Delburne Red Deer County Of County 42 Lousana Stettler Penhold Markerville No. 6 21 Big Caroline 54 Spruce View Valley County Of Dickson Innisfail Byemoor Paintearth Elnora Endiang No. 18 Burnstick Dickson Lake Dam Bowden 56 Wimborne Rumsey 2 Trochu Sundre 27 Torrington Rowley Olds Three Craigmyle Mountain 9 Clearwater Alingham Hills Starland Hanna View County Morrin Richdale County County Delia Sunnyslope Didsbury Kneehill County Michichi Youngstown Linden Munson I.d. No. 9 22 Swalwell (banff Chinook Cereal N.p.) M.d. Of Cremona Carstairs Bighorn Acme Carbon Rocky View Hesketh No. 8 Water Oyen Valley County Drumheller Crossfield Wayne 40 Madden 10 Bottrel 72 Beiseker East Coulee Sunnynook 41 Irricana Dorothy Redland Acadia Valley M.d. Of Rockyford Acadia Kathyrn No. 34 Legend Dalroy 36 Empress Landcover Wetland Basin Boundary Calgary Strathmore Cessford Chestermere Water Herb Municipal Boundaries Bindloss 24 Wardlow Non-Vegetated Grassland Highways County Of d Newell x Wheatland 1 Cypress m Rock/Rubble Agriculture Red Deer River .
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 ESTMA Report
    Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act - Annual Report Reporting Entity Name Enerplus Corporation Reporting Entities May Reporting Year From 1/1/2020 To: 12/31/2020 Date submitted 5/19/2021 Insert Their Brand/Logo here Original Submission Reporting Entity ESTMA Identification Number E753426 Amended Report Other Subsidiaries Included (optional field) For Consolidated Reports - Subsidiary Enerplus Energy Ltd. (E350507), 1030467 Alberta Ltd. (E415832), Enerplus Resources (USA) Corporation (E423963), Reporting Entities Included in Report: Enerplus Resources U.S. Inc. (E565222), 3104613 Nova Scotia Ltd. (E971960) Not Substituted Attestation by Reporting Entity In accordance with the requirements of the ESTMA, and in particular section 9 thereof, I attest I have reviewed the information contained in the ESTMA report for the entity(ies) listed above. Based on my knowledge, and having exercised reasonable diligence, the information in the ESTMA report is true, accurate and complete in all material respects for the purposes of the Act, for the reporting year listed above. Full Name of Director or Officer of Reporting Entity Shaina Morihira Date 5/17/2021 Position Title Vice President, Finance Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act - Annual Report Reporting Year From: 1/1/2020 To: 12/31/2020 Reporting Entity Name Enerplus Corporation Currency of the Report CAD Reporting Entity ESTMA E753426 Identification Number Subsidiary Reporting Entities (if Enerplus Energy Ltd. (E350507), 1030467 Alberta Ltd. (E415832), Enerplus Resources (USA) Corporation
    [Show full text]
  • February 2006 UNIVERSITY of ALBERTA SUMMARY of STATISTICS - ACADEMIC YEAR 2005/2006 DECEMBER 1, 2005
    University of Alberta This document canbe obtainedin PDFformat at:www.registrar.ualberta.ca/stats will notassume responsibilityfortheintegrity ofthedata. ce Offi The Registrar’s Ininstances whereadocumenthasbeen altered, ed byanenduser. been modifi ers mustberemovedfrom any tableorgraphthathas proper acknowledgement. Documentidentifi The contentsoftheSummary ofStatisticsbookarenotcopyrightedandmaybe reproducedwith 2005-2006 of Statistics Summary February 2006 February UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA SUMMARY OF STATISTICS - ACADEMIC YEAR 2005/2006 DECEMBER 1, 2005 ***TABLE OF CONTENTS*** PAGE PREFACE ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1 GRAPHS 2.1 Ten Year Distribution of Students by Term ............................................................................................... 6 2.2 Spring Term: Enrolment Trends .............................................................................................................. 7 2.3 Summer Term: Enrolment Trends ........................................................................................................... 8 2.4 Fall Term Full-Time Undergraduate: Enrolment Trends ........................................................................ 10 2.5 Fall Term Part-Time Undergraduate: Enrolment Trends ....................................................................... 11 3.1 Spring Term by Faculty .......................................................................................................................... 16 3.2 Summer Term by Faculty ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Large Scale WAN Emulation
    Large Scale WAN Emulation Martin Arlitt Rob Simmonds Carey Williamson - University of Calgary Calgary Alberta March 18, 2002 Outline • Overview of WAN Simulation & Emulation • Introduction to IP-TNE • Discussion of Related Projects • Validation of IP-TNE • Current Projects Involving IP-TNE • Future Work 1 Performance Evaluation Approaches 1. Experimental + offers the most realistic environment - requires significant financial investment - can be difficult to repeat results - restricted to existing technologies 2 Performance Evaluation Approaches 2. Simulation + low-cost, flexible, controllable, reproducible environment - abstractions can compromise usefulness of results 3. Analytical + provides quick answers - often requires the greatest degrees of abstraction 3 Performance Evaluation Approaches 4. Emulation * a hybrid performance evaluation methodology * combines aspects of other three approaches + enables controlled experimentation with existing applications - still suffers from drawbacks of other approaches 4 Wide-Area Network Simulation • provides a virtual Wide-Area Network (WAN) environment • allows all network conditions to be controlled – packet loss – packet reordering/duplication – link bandwidths – propogation delays – asymetric links – bounded queue sizes – multipath • allows alternative networking technologies to be evaluated 5 Wide-Area Network Emulation • extends capabilities of WAN simulation • enables controlled testing with unmodified applications • both simulation and emulation are important tools 6 Challenges • scaling to large,
    [Show full text]