DOCSLIB.ORG

Proposed Café and Carriage Display, Gunnersbury Park

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proposed Café and Carriage Display, Gunnersbury Park Proposed Café and Carriage Display, Gunnersbury Park HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT January 2015 KATHARINE BARBER AND MIRIAM HOLLAND 15 Bermondsey Square, Tower Bridge Road, London SE1 3UN [email protected] www.purcelluk.com All rights in this work are reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means (including DOCUMENT ISSUE without limitation by photocopying or placing on a website) without the prior permission in writing of Purcell except in accordance with ISSUE 1 (MARCH 2014) - EALING AND HOUNSLOW COUNCILS the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Applications for permission to reproduce any part of this work should be ISSUE 2 (JANUARY 2015) - EALING AND HOUNSLOW COUNCILS addressed to Purcell at [email protected]. Undertaking any unauthorised act in relation to this work may result in a civil claim for damages and/or criminal prosecution. Any materials used in this work which are subject to third party copyright have been reproduced under licence from the copyright owner except in the case of works of unknown authorship as defined by the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Any person wishing to assert rights in relation to works which have been reproduced as works of unknown authorship should contact Purcell at [email protected]. Purcell asserts its moral rights to be identified as the author of this work under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Purcell® is the trading name of Purcell Miller Tritton LLP. © Purcell 2015 KB/tro/234320 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 5 4 IMPACT ASSESSMENT 37 1.1 Purpose of the Report 5 4.1 Summary of Proposals 37 1.2 Scope of the Study 5 4.2 Assessment Methodology 45 1.3 Existing Information 5 4.3 Impact Assessment 46 2 UNDERSTANDING 6 5 CONCLUSION 48 2.1 Planning Context and Legislative Framework 6 2.2 Site Location and Setting 8 2.3 Heritage Context 9 APPENDICES 2.4 Historic Development 13 2.5 Development Phases 17 APPENDIX A: BIBLIOGRAPHY 49 2.6 The Evolution of the Site by Development Phases 19 2.7 Views 24 3 SIGNIFICANCE 31 3.1 Assessing Significance 31 3.2 Statutory and Local Designations 32 3.3 Evidential Value 32 3.4 Historic Value 33 3.5 Aesthetic Value 34 3.6 Communal Value 35 3.7 Summary of Significance 36 3.8 Significance of Views 36 3 The overall layout of the Park in the present day is illustrated on the plan below POPE’S LANE ENTRANCE LIONEL ROAD EXISTING CAFÉ NORTH ENTRANCE TEMPLE SMALL LAKE MANSION LARGE MANSION ORANGERY STABLES Gunnersbury Park Boundary FORMER FARM BUILDINGS EXISTING CAFÉ AND TEMPLE PROPOSED SITE OF LAKE NEW CAFE POTOMAC LAKE The Park in the modern day Buildings Concentrated Planting With key features labelled for orientation WEST LODGE 4 Proposed Café and Carriage Display, Gunnersbury Park, Heritage Impact Assessment, January 2015 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT 1.2 SCOPE OF THE STUDY 1.3 EXISTING INFORMATION This Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) The HIA covers the following areas in The report forms part of a suite of 1 has been commissioned by Ealing Borough order to provide a baseline assessment heritage documents prepared in support Council. It has been prepared to assess of the proposals: of Heritage Lottery Fund applications for INTRODUCTION the impact of a proposed new café and • Understanding: to establish what the Park as a whole (Parks for People) exhibition space on the heritage value of heritage assets are within the and the Large Mansion (Heritage Grant) Gunnersbury Park. The café is proposed to setting of the proposal site and the and associated Listed Building consents. replace an existing café structure at the same legislation that protects them These documents include a park wide site. The existing café is a low quality build in Conservation Management Plan which • Site Assessment: to give a a poor and degenerating state of repair. The along with supplementary research and description of the site and any park itself is designated as a Conservation analysis has informed the preparation of adjacent heritage assets. Area and a Registered Park and Garden, a this report. number of structures within the park and in • Historic Development: to establish the vicinity of the proposed café location are the key dates in the development afforded Listed Building status. of Gunnersbury Park and specifically the impacted area. • Significance: to assess the heritage value of impacted heritage assets and how they are important within their setting. • Impact Assessment: to analyse the effects the proposals will have on the significance of the heritage assets within the visual envelope of the site. 2.1 PLANNING CONTEXT AND Regional Planning policy Planning decisions LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK The London Plan (2011) Including Revised C Development should identify, value, Early Minor Alterations (October conserve, restore, re-use and incorporate 2 National planning policy framework 2013) heritage assets, where appropriate UNDERSTANDING The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF; March 2012) is the overarching The London Plan is the overall strategic plan D Development affecting heritage assets planning policy document for England. Within for London, and it sets out a fully integrated and their settings should conserve their Section 12 – conserving and enhancing the economic, environmental, transport and social significance, by being sympathetic to their historic environment – are the government’s framework for the development of the capital form, scale, materials and architectural detail. policies for the protection of heritage to 2031. It forms part of the development assets. Paragraph 128 states: “In determining plan for Greater London. London boroughs’ E New development should make provision applications, local planning authorities should local plans need to be in general conformity for the protection of archaeological resources, require an applicant to describe the significance with the London Plan, and its policies guide landscapes and significant memorials. The of any heritage assets affected, including any decisions on planning applications by councils physical assets should, where possible, be contribution made to their setting. The level of and the Mayor. made available to the public on-site. Where detail should be proportionate to the assets’ the archaeological asset or memorial importance” it also states that the assessment THE LONDON PLAN 2011: cannot be preserved or managed on-site, should be “no more than is sufficient to Key Policies to be considered in the context provision must be made for the investigation, understand the potential impact of the proposal of the site include: understanding,recording, dissemination and on their significance” POLICY 7.8 HERITAGE ASSETS AND archiving of that asset. ARCHAEOLOGY The policies advise a holistic approach LDF preparation to planning and development, where all Strategic F Boroughs should, in LDF policies, seek significant elements that make up the historic A London’s heritage assets and historic to maintain and enhance the contribution environment are termed ‘heritage assets’. environment, including listed buildings, of built, landscaped and buried heritage These consist of designated assets (such as registered historic parks and gardens and to London’s environmental quality, cultural listed buildings or conservation areas) and other natural and historic landscapes, identity and economy as part of managing non-designated assets (such as locally listed conservation areas, World Heritage Sites, London’s ability to accommodate change and buildings or those features which are of registered battlefields, scheduled monuments, regeneration. heritage value). archaeological remains and memorials should be identified, so that the desirability of G Boroughs, in consultation with English The policies within the document emphasise sustaining and enhancing their significance and Heritage, Natural England and other the need for assessing the significance of of utilising their positive role in place shaping relevant statutory organisations, should heritage assets and their setting in order to can be taken into account. include appropriate policies in their LDFs fully understand the historic environment for identifying, protecting, enhancing and and inform suitable design proposals for B Development should incorporate measures improving access to the historic environment change to, or within, the locality of significant that identify, record, interpret, protect and heritage assets and their settings where buildings. The document also requires an and, where appropriate, present the site’s appropriate, and to archaeological assets, assessment of the impact of development archaeology. memorials and historic and natural landscape proposals affecting heritage assets. character within their area. POLICY 7.9 HERITAGE-LED London plan 2011 (revised early minor identify potential modifications to reduce borough’s Local Plan will soon be superceded REGENERATION alterations Oct 2013) carbon emissions and secure sustainable by the new Local Plan which is currently Amend and split paragraph 7.31 supporting development. In doing this a balanced being prepared. Strategic Policy 7.8 HERITAGE ASSETS AND approach should be taken, weighing the A Regeneration schemes should identify and ARCHAEOLOGY extent of the mitigation of climate change Guidance documentation make use of heritage assets and reinforce the 7.31 Crucial to the preservation of this involved against potential harm to the English Heritage produces guidance qualities that make them significant
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GUNNERSBURY PARK Options Appraisal
    GUNNERSBURY PARK Options Appraisal Report By Jura Consultants and LDN Architects June 2009 LDN Architects 16 Dublin Street Edinburgh EH1 3RE 0131 556 8631 JURA CONSULTANTS www.ldn.co.uk 7 Straiton View Straiton Business Park Loanhead Midlothian Edinburgh Montagu Evans LLP EH20 9QZ Clarges House 6-12 Clarges Street TEL. 0131 440 6750 London, W1J 8HB FAX. 0131 440 6751 [email protected] 020 7493 4002 www.jura-consultants.co.uk www.montagu-evans.co.uk CONTENTS Section Page Executive Summary i. 1. Introduction 1. 2. Background 5. 3. Strategic Context 17. 4. Development of Options and Scenarios 31. 5. Appraisal of Development Scenarios 43. 6. Options Development 73. 7. Enabling Development 87. 8. Preferred Option 99. 9. Conclusions and Recommendations 103. Appendix A Stakeholder Consultations Appendix B Training Opportunities Appendix C Gunnersbury Park Covenant Appendix D Other Stakeholder Organisations Appendix E Market Appraisal Appendix F Conservation Management Plan The Future of Gunnersbury Park Consultation to be conducted in the Summer of 2009 refers to Options 1, 2, 3 and 4. These options relate to the options presented in this report as follows: Report Section 6 Description Consultation Option A Minimum Intervention Option 1 Option B Mixed Use Development Option 2 Option C Restoration and Upgrading Option 4 Option D Destination Development Option 3 Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction A study team led by Jura Consultants with LDN Architects and Montagu Evans was commissioned by Ealing and Hounslow Borough Councils to carry out an options appraisal for Gunnersbury Park. Gunnersbury Park is situated within the London Borough of Hounslow and is unique in being jointly owned by Ealing and Hounslow.
    [Show full text]
  • N11 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    N11 bus time schedule & line map N11 Liverpool Street - Ealing Broadway View In Website Mode The N11 bus line (Liverpool Street - Ealing Broadway) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Ealing Broadway: 12:21 AM - 4:51 AM (2) Liverpool Street: 12:15 AM - 11:45 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest N11 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next N11 bus arriving. Direction: Ealing Broadway N11 bus Time Schedule 81 stops Ealing Broadway Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 12:21 AM - 4:51 AM Monday 12:21 AM - 4:51 AM Liverpool Street Station (L) 192 Bishopsgate, London Tuesday 12:21 AM - 4:51 AM Wormwood Street (Y) Wednesday 12:21 AM - 4:51 AM 99 Bishopsgate, London Thursday 12:21 AM - 4:51 AM Old Broad Street (LL) Friday 12:21 AM - 4:51 AM 5 Old Broad Street, London Saturday 12:21 AM - 4:51 AM Bank Station / Queen Victoria Street 1 Poultry, London St Paul's Churchyard (SH) Old Change Court, London N11 bus Info Direction: Ealing Broadway St Paul's Cathedral (SJ) Stops: 81 10 Saint Paul's Church Yard, London Trip Duration: 83 min Line Summary: Liverpool Street Station (L), City Thameslink Stn / Ludgate Circus (F) Wormwood Street (Y), Old Broad Street (LL), Bank 65 Ludgate Hill, London Station / Queen Victoria Street, St Paul's Churchyard (SH), St Paul's Cathedral (SJ), City Thameslink Stn / Shoe Lane (H) Ludgate Circus (F), Shoe Lane (H), Fetter Lane (W), Fleet Street, London Chancery Lane (W), The Royal Courts Of Justice (P), Aldwych / Drury Lane (R), Savoy Street (U), Bedford Fetter Lane (W) Street
    [Show full text]
  • Gunnersbury Park and Museum
    GUNNERSBURY PARK London Public Feedback Meeting Keith Townsend, Executive Director, Ealing Council 11 February 2014 Gunnersbury 2026 Gunnersbury Park Regeneration Project GUNNERSBURY PARK London Slide 2 Outline of presentation • Welcome and Introductions • Gunnersbury 2026 • Public Consultation Findings and Next Steps • Future Sustainability and Governance • Questions Gunnersbury Park Regeneration Project GUNNERSBURY PARK London Slide 3 The Challenge • Restore Gunnersbury Park and Museum by its centenary in 2026 • Return it to the heart of the community and ensure it can offer something for everyone • Ensure it is looked after for the next 100 years and beyond Opening of Gunnersbury Park, 1926 Gunnersbury Park Regeneration Project GUNNERSBURY PARK London Slide 4 Development of the Masterplan • High level cost estimate of £51m to address all the issues and challenges • Holistic approach taken as advised by English Heritage • Phasing of the 12 year programme to maximise the opportunity of delivering a first phase • A strategy supported by both Councils for HLF funding with park and museum bids running in parallel • Governance – clear structure, both councils working together with English Heritage on the Project Board Gunnersbury Park Regeneration Project GUNNERSBURY PARK London Slide 5 Development of the Masterplan – Phase 1 (£21m) • Repair and refurbishment of large mansion and museum • Priority repairs following condition surveys • Refurbishment of priority heritage parkland inc Orangery plus other key park features including boating lake,
    [Show full text]
  • Westminster Abbey a Service for the New Parliament
    St Margaret’s Church Westminster Abbey A Service for the New Parliament Wednesday 8th January 2020 9.30 am The whole of the church is served by a hearing loop. Users should turn the hearing aid to the setting marked T. Members of the congregation are kindly requested to refrain from using private cameras, video, or sound recording equipment. Please ensure that mobile telephones and other electronic devices are switched off. The service is conducted by The Very Reverend Dr David Hoyle, Dean of Westminster. The service is sung by the Choir of St Margaret’s Church, conducted by Greg Morris, Director of Music. The organ is played by Matthew Jorysz, Assistant Organist, Westminster Abbey. The organist plays: Meditation on Brother James’s Air Harold Darke (1888–1976) Dies sind die heil’gen zehn Gebot’ BWV 678 Johann Sebastian Bach (1685–1750) The Lord Speaker is received at the East Door. All stand as he is conducted to his seat, and then sit. The Speaker of the House of Commons is received at the East Door. All stand as he is conducted to his seat, and then sit. 2 O R D E R O F S E R V I C E All stand to sing THE HYMN E thou my vision, O Lord of my heart, B be all else but naught to me, save that thou art, be thou my best thought in the day and the night, both waking and sleeping, thy presence my light. Be thou my wisdom, be thou my true word, be thou ever with me, and I with thee, Lord; be thou my great Father, and I thy true son, be thou in me dwelling, and I with thee one.
    [Show full text]
  • Somerset House
    Somerset House Conway Archive Old Somerset House, London – The River Front of Old Somerset House, from a Watercolour by Paul Sandby, RA, Image CON-B1035-F1-12 The Courtauld Institute of Art, CC-BY-NC Old Somerset House, London – Drawing by Kenton Couse, Image CON-B1035-F1-01, The Courtauld Institute of Art, CC-BY-NC Old Somerset House, London – Drawing by Thomas Sandby in Royal Library, Windsor Castle, Image CON-B1035- F1-15, The Courtauld Institute of Art, CC-BY-NC Old Somerset House, London – Engraving of 1797 described as after a painting of 1650 by Cornelis Bol, Image CON-B1035-F1-16, The Courtauld Institute of Art, CC-BY-NC Old Somerset House, London – Engraving of The Southern Front of Somerset House with its Extensive Gardens &c, Drawing by Jan Kip c. 1720, Image CON-B1035F1-10 The Courtauld Institute of Art, CC-BY-NC Old Somerset House, London – Detail of Etching by W. Hallam (British Museum), 1607-77, Image CON-B1035-F1- 08, The Courtauld Institute of Art, CC-BY-NC Old Somerset House, London – from Britannia Illustrata, vol. 1, 1714, pl.4, Image CON-B1035-F1-09, The Courtauld Institute of Art, CC-BY-NC Old Somerset House, London – Detail of a painting by Cornelis Bol, c.1640-50, Evelyn Collection, Image CON- B1035-F1-17, The Courtauld Institute of Art, CC-BY-NC Somerset House, London - Detail of vestibule, Image CON-B1034-F2-13 The Courtauld Institute of Art, CC-BY-NC Details unavailable Somerset House, London – The Strand Façade, Image CON-B1034-F1-02, The Courtauld Institute of Art, CC-BY-NC Somerset House, London – South Side of courtyard area, taken 1969, Image CON-B1034-F1-28 The Courtauld Institute of Art, CC-BY-NC Somerset House, London – West side of covered way through north range, taken 1985, Image CON-B1034-F1-34, The Courtauld Institute of Art, CC-BY-NC Somerset House, London – South face of north range and gate linking with inner west range, taken 1969, Image CON-B1034-F3-19, The Courtauld Institute of Art, CC-BY-NC Somerset House, London, CON-B1034-F3-17, The Courtauld Institute of Art, CC-BY-NC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Architecture of Sir Ernest George and His Partners, C. 1860-1922
    The Architecture of Sir Ernest George and His Partners, C. 1860-1922 Volume II Hilary Joyce Grainger Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Ph. D. The University of Leeds Department of Fine Art January 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS Notes to Chapters 1- 10 432 Bibliography 487 Catalogue of Executed Works 513 432 Notes to the Text Preface 1 Joseph William Gleeson-White, 'Revival of English Domestic Architecture III: The Work of Mr Ernest George', The Studio, 1896 pp. 147-58; 'The Revival of English Domestic Architecture IV: The Work of Mr Ernest George', The Studio, 1896 pp. 27-33 and 'The Revival of English Domestic Architecture V: The Work of Messrs George and Peto', The Studio, 1896 pp. 204-15. 2 Immediately after the dissolution of partnership with Harold Peto on 31 October 1892, George entered partnership with Alfred Yeates, and so at the time of Gleeson-White's articles, the partnership was only four years old. 3 Gleeson-White, 'The Revival of English Architecture III', op. cit., p. 147. 4 Ibid. 5 Sir ReginaldýBlomfield, Richard Norman Shaw, RA, Architect, 1831-1912: A Study (London, 1940). 6 Andrew Saint, Richard Norman Shaw (London, 1976). 7 Harold Faulkner, 'The Creator of 'Modern Queen Anne': The Architecture of Norman Shaw', Country Life, 15 March 1941 pp. 232-35, p. 232. 8 Saint, op. cit., p. 274. 9 Hermann Muthesius, Das Englische Haus (Berlin 1904-05), 3 vols. 10 Hermann Muthesius, Die Englische Bankunst Der Gerenwart (Leipzig. 1900). 11 Hermann Muthesius, The English House, edited by Dennis Sharp, translated by Janet Seligman London, 1979) p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Custom House
    THE CUSTOM HOUSE The London Custom House is a forgotten treasure, on a prime site on the Thames with glorious views of the river and Tower Bridge. The question now before the City Corporation is whether it should become a luxury hotel with limited public access or whether it should have a more public use, especially the magnificent 180 foot Long Room. The Custom House is zoned for office use and permission for a hotel requires a change of use which the City may be hesitant to give. Circumstances have changed since the Custom House was sold as part of a £370 million job lot of HMRC properties around the UK to an offshore company in Bermuda – a sale that caused considerable merriment among HM customs staff in view of the tax avoidance issues it raised. SAVE Britain’s Heritage has therefore worked with the architect John Burrell to show how this monumental public building, once thronged with people, can have a more public use again. SAVE invites public debate on the future of the Custom House. Re-connecting The City to the River Thames The Custom House is less than 200 metres from Leadenhall Market and the Lloyds Building and the Gherkin just beyond where high-rise buildings crowd out the sky. Who among the tens of thousands of City workers emerging from their offices in search of air and light make the short journey to the river? For decades it has been made virtually impossible by the traffic fumed canyon that is Lower Thames Street. Yet recently for several weeks we have seen a London free of traffic where people can move on foot or bike without being overwhelmed by noxious fumes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Avarice and Ambition of William Benson’, the Georgian Group Journal, Vol
    Anna Eavis, ‘The avarice and ambition of William Benson’, The Georgian Group Journal, Vol. XII, 2002, pp. 8–37 TEXT © THE AUTHORS 2002 THE AVARICE AND AMBITION OF WILLIAM BENSON ANNA EAVIS n his own lifetime William Benson’s moment of probably motivated by his desire to build a neo- Ifame came in January , as the subject of an Palladian parliament house. anonymous pamphlet: That Benson had any direct impact on the spread of neo-Palladian ideas other than his patronage of I do therefore with much contrition bewail my making Campbell through the Board of Works is, however, of contracts with deceitfulness of heart … my pride, unlikely. Howard Colvin’s comprehensive and my arrogance, my avarice and my ambition have been my downfall .. excoriating account of Benson’s surveyorship shows only too clearly that his pre-occupations were To us, however, he is also famous for building a financial and self-motivated, rather than aesthetic. precociously neo-Palladian house in , as well He did not publish on architecture, neo-Palladian or as infamous for his corrupt, incompetent and otherwise and, with the exception of Wilbury, consequently brief tenure as Surveyor-General of the appears to have left no significant buildings, either in King’s Works, which ended in his dismissal for a private or official capacity. This absence of a context deception of King and Government. Wilbury, whose for Wilbury makes the house even more startling; it elevation was claimed to be both Jonesian and appears to spring from nowhere and, as far as designed by Benson, and whose plan was based on Benson’s architectural output is concerned, to lead that of the Villa Poiana, is notable for apparently nowhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Our 2019-20 Annual Report and Financial Statement
    DocuSign Envelope ID: 2F76974F-6ABC-477C-BD62-86076B65FA72 Registered charity number 1063640 Company number 03388137 Somerset House Trust Report and financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2020 DocuSign Envelope ID: 2F76974F-6ABC-477C-BD62-86076B65FA72 Somerset House Trust Legal and Administration details For the year ended 31 March 2020 Registered Office Somerset House Strand London WC2R 1LA 1063640 Registered Charity number Company Number 03388137 incorporated in England and Wales Directors (Trustees): The directors of the company who were in office during the year and up to the date of signing the financial statements were: Mr William Sieghart CBE Chair of the Board of Trustees Ms Judy Gibbons Deputy Chair of the Board of Trustees Mr Jonathan Higgins Resigned 18 March 2020 Sir Malcolm Grant Resigned 9 December 2019 Mr Marcus Lyon Resigned 25 September 2019 Ms Caroline Michel Resigned 25 September 2019 Mr James Lambert OBE Member of the Audit & Risk Committee Mr Brian Eno Chair of Creative Ambassadors Group Mr Julien Sevaux Mrs Melanie Hall QC Member of the Audit & Risk Committee Mr Paul Goswell Ms Carol Fairweather Chair of the Audit & Risk Committee Mr Nader Mousavizadeh Resigned 31 January 2020 Mr Oluwole Kolade Appointed 12 June 2019 Member of the Nominations & Governance Committee Ms Martine D'Anglejan-Chatillon Appointed 12 June 2019 Mr Jonathan Newhouse Appointed 18 March 2020 Ms Alix Burge Appointed 18 March 2020 Member of the Audit & Risk Committee Ms Monica Monajem Appointed 18 March 2020 Chair of the Development Advisory
    [Show full text]
  • Acton and Chiswick Circular Trail (ACCT) – 6.5 Miles
    Acton and Chiswick Circular Trail (ACCT) – 6.5 miles Acton Town Station – Gunnersbury Park – Strand on the Green – Gunnersbury Station – Chiswick business park - Gunnersbury Triangle Wildlife Reserve – Chiswick Park Station – Acton Green Common – Chiswick Common – Turnham Green Station – Bedford Park garden suburb - Acton Park – Churchfield Road – Crown Street - Mill Hill Road – Acton Town Station Route: Easy – mostly surfaced paths through parks and commons and quiet roads with short sections of main roads. Local Amenities: cafes, pubs, shops at several places. Toilets available at Gunnersbury Park and in some cafes/pubs and an Acton supermarket on route. Bike racks by Acton Town station and shops. Points of Interest: Gunnersbury Park – historic house, museum and park; the new Brentford Football Stadium; Strand on the Green on the Thames with historic houses; the landscaped Chiswick Business Park; London Wildlife Trust’s reserve at Gunnersbury; the garden suburb of Bedford Park; and Acton Park. Transport: Acton Town Station (Piccadilly and District) and local buses. Join or drop out at Kew Bridge rail station or Gunnersbury, Chiswick Park or Turnham Green tube stations. Starting at Acton Town Station. Turn left out of the station and walk past cafes and shops to cross the busy North Circular Road (A406) at lights. Continue ahead on Popes Lane to turn left into Gunnersbury Park (1), walk down the drive and turn 2nd right by a children’s playground, the café & toilets. Before the boating lake, turn left down a path by the side of the house to the Orangery. At the Orangery turn left to walk round the far side of the Horseshoe Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • The Royal Tour : the Wedding of Hrh Prince William of Wales to Catherine ‘Kate’ Middleton
    THE ROYAL TOUR : THE WEDDING OF HRH PRINCE WILLIAM OF WALES TO CATHERINE ‘KATE’ MIDDLETON Trip Highlights: Buckingham Palace Westminster Abbey Windsor Castle Hedsor House Kensington Palace Edinburgh Castle TUESDAY ARRIVE LONDON 26 APRIL 2011 Arrive London Heathrow Airport and meet your guide who will escort you to your coach for transfer directly to central London for a panoramic sightseeing tour. Sights include Westminster Abbey, Houses of Parliament, Big Ben, St. Paul’s Cathedral and Buckingham Palace. Continue to your hotel in central London, where accommodation is reserved for 6 nights on a bed and breakfast basis. WEDNESDAY WINDOR CASTLE—THE TOWER OF LONDON 27 APRIL 2011 This morning visit Windsor Castle one of three official residences of The Queen, and the home to the Sovereign for over 900 years. The imposing towers and battlements of the Castle loom large from every approach to the town, creating one of the world's most spectacular skylines. No other royal residence has played such an important role in the nation's history. You will also visit St George's Chapel, one of the most beautiful ecclesiastical buildings in England. There will be time at leisure to enjoy lunch before travelling to the Tower of London, home to the Crown Jewels and an integral part of British Royal history. Here you will discover the Tower’s 900‐year history as a Royal Palace and fortress, prison and place of execution, mint, arsenal, menagerie and jewel house. THURSDAY LONDON : KEW PALACE—KENSINGTON PALACE 28 APRIL 2011 This morning visit Kew Palace, the smallest of English Royal Palaces with its privacy that made it the favourite country retreat for the Royal family in the late 18th century.
    [Show full text]
  • The Commission for Somerset House in the “Eye of the Public”’, the Georgian Group Journal, Vol
    Jocelyn Anderson, ‘The Commission for Somerset House in the “Eye of the Public”’, The Georgian Group Journal, Vol. XXIV, 2016, pp. 81–94 TEXT © THE AUTHORS 2016 THE COMMISSION FOR SOMERSET HOUSE IN The ‘EYE OF THE PUBLIC’ JOCELYN ANDERSON Although architectural historians have long identified been debated in Parliament and in the press. This Somerset House as the single most important public article examines these debates and explores the public building project to be built in late eighteenth-century interest which surrounded the Somerset House project Britain, relatively little work has been done on public when Chambers received the commission, and in reactions to it. When Sir William Chambers received doing so, it analyses the context in which he produced the commission in November 1775, the project had his designs. been underway for months, during which time it had Fig. 1. North Front (Strand Facade) Somerset House. (Courthauld Institute of Art) THE GEORGIAN GROUP JOURNAL VOLUME XXIV THE COMMISSION FOR SOMERSET HOUSE IN THE ‘ EYE OF THE PUBLIC ’ omerset House (Fig. 1) has long been recognized In the days that followed this announcement, a Sas the single most important public building series of proposals were debated by the House, project to have been executed in late eighteenth- and, although they were ultimately passed, they led century Britain. Intended to house offices for the to disputes. Newspapers criticised the project as a Navy, several tax departments, the Royal Academy, royal conspiracy, members of Parliament debated Royal Society and Royal Society of Antiquaries, what architectural style and expenditure would it was designed by Sir William Chambers.
    [Show full text]