The Fauna of Greece and Adjacent Areas in the Age of Homer: Evidence from the First Written Documents of Greek Literature

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Fauna of Greece and Adjacent Areas in the Age of Homer: Evidence from the First Written Documents of Greek Literature Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2005) 32, 1875-1882 ORIGINAL The fauna of Greece and adjacent areas ARTICLE in the Age of Homer: evidence from the first written documents of Greek literature Eleni Voultsiadou* and Apostolos Tatolas Department of Zoology, School of Biology, A b str a c t Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, A im To study the composition of fauna in Greece and adjacent areas around 1 hessalomkt, Greece ' r ’ 3000 years ago based on the knowledge of Homeric man about the animal kin g d o m . L o c a tio n Greece and adjacent areas. M e th o d Analysis of information derived from a thorough study of the first written documents of Greek literature, the epics, attributed to Homer and H esiod. R e su lts Records of 2442 animals were found, corresponding to 71 different animal names. All animal names were attributed to recent taxa, at different category levels; the majority (65%) were assigned to taxa at the species level and the rest to supraspecific taxa. Most of the animal names recorded in the epics have been retained as integral words or roots in Modern Greek and they have been used in the formation of the Latin scientific taxa names. Five animal phyla appear in the texts: (1) Chordata (mostly birds and mammals), (2) Arthropoda, (3) Mollusca, (4) Porifera, and (5) Annelida. Information in the epics also includes morphology, biology, ecology (habitat and prey-predator relationships), and behaviour. The presence of several species in the area in that period is documented on the basis of archaeological and/or palaeontological findings from various Greek localities. Main conclusions The knowledge of Homeric man about animals, as reflected in the epics, seems to concentrate mainly, but not exclusively, on animals involved in human activities. The populations of some common animal species of the Homeric Age in Greek populated areas have become extinct or reduced at the present time. On the other hand, some common animals of the present time do not appear in the epics, since they were introduced later. Useful zoological information can be derived from the study of classical texts, which may help historical biogeographers as a supplement to archaeology and art, in the reconstruction of faunas of older periods. ^Correspondence: Eleni Voultsiadou, Department of Zoology, School of Biology, K e y w o r d s Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR54124, Thessaloniki, Greece. Age of Homer, animal distribution, animals in antiquity, extinction, geometric E-mail: [email protected] period, Greece, historical zoogeography. studied osteological material found in Greek archaeological INTRODUCTION sites during excavation. Based on these findings, they have Scientists have searched for palaeo-faunistic and palaeo- drawn interesting conclusions concerning the relationships environmental evidence in their attempt to gain an under­ between man and animals in previous epochs, such as the standing of animal life and the environment in the past and for Pleistocene ( Jarman, 1996) or the early historical periods such evidence of human intervention and subsequent impact on as the geometric period (Tsoukala & Hatzi-Valianou, 1996; regional faunas. Palaeontologists and archaeologists have Wilkens, 1996). Another angle of approach has been through © 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd www.blackwellpubllshlng.com/jbl dol:10.1111/j.1 365-2699.2005.01 335.x 1875 E. Voultsiadou and A. Tatolas the study of art. Iconographical sources have commonly given given in the texts. Wherever possible, this was supported by zoologists useful evidence. For instance, various authors have available archaeological or palaeontological evidence. All the tried to recognize and record the animals depicted in Minoan above data were evaluated by employing a variety of zoological wall paintings, vases or figurines (Vanschoonwinkel, 1996). books and papers (Nowak, 1991; Handrinos & Akriotis, 1997), In addition to archaeology and art, useful information can as well as encyclopaedias and general or specialized lexicons be derived from written documents from early civilizations. (Encyclopedia Papyros Larousse Britannica; Liddell and Scott: The Age of Homer is a critical moment in Greek history. It is Great dictionary of the Greek language; Kofiniotis: Homeric the late geometric period, covering the eighth and seventh Lexicon). The works of Aristotle (i.e.History of animals) were centuries b c . During this period the Greek alphabet was also consulted. In addition to this material, various specialists developed and the first written documents of Greek literature, in different taxonomic groups were consulted. the epics, appeared in two main forms: the heroic epic Care was taken to be as accurate as possible when attributing represented by Homer and the didactic epic represented by classical names to modern taxa. As a result, in various cases for Hesiod. The epics, in spite of being questionable as historical which no clear evidence existed in the texts, we preferred to documents, constitute a useful source for historians and suggest a higher taxon instead of a specific species or genus. archaeologists in their attempt to understand early historic The fact that a classical name has been retained in Modern community culture. The ‘Homeric community reflects three Greek was not in itself sufficient to identify a species, as shown different time periods (Latacz, 1997; Mazarakis Ainian, 2000): through the examples given below. We should however, stress (1) prehistoric (mostly Mycenaean), (2) intermediate (corres­ the continuity of Greek language from the Homeric poems up ponding to the dark ages, covering the eleventh to ninth to the present, pointed out by various authors (Browning, centuries b c ) , and (3) the eighth century b c (the period in 1983; Babiniotis, 2000; Doukas, 2000). It is remarkable that the which Homer lived). The latter two form the so-called majority of the Homeric words are used in the same way and ‘geometric period’. A fourth layer, which is mythical, appears many of them with the same meaning in Modern Greek. to be an invention of the poet’s imagination. Additionally, etymology proves in several cases to be critical in Langdon (1993) considered that the dynamic relationship recognizing animals. Some examples are: Kuvopaïcrcriç between art and poetry signalled both the climax and the end (k ú c o v = dog + pafrn = destroy), „piovoç („pi = half + of the Age of Homer. The presence of animals is conspicuous voç = donkey), TtàpSakiç (TtapSakôç = spotted), noXvnovç in both the art and the epics of this late geometric period. (noXóc, — m any + Ttoùç = leg). These first written documents of Greek language contain Detailed justification was not considered necessary for the valuable information on the relationship of Homeric man with names of well-known domestic animals such as the horse, cow, animals. Furthermore, the results of their study should help goat, sheep, donkey, pig, as well as the lion, wolf, honeybee, zoologists and historical zoogeographers reconstruct the fauna brown bear or the monk seal. However, in some cases the of this age. This paper presents an annotated list of all animals recent scientific name of an animal was not so clearly evident, appearing in the epics, makes an attempt to assign the classical or the authors had to decide among several closely related animal names to recent taxa and gives a comparison of fauna species. Several examples are given below showing how the illustrated in the texts of that age to present fauna. identification of some animals was traced through various clues given in the texts. The name „piovoç Í j q ó x e q o c, (Iliad, 11.852) was attributed CLASSICAL NAMES AND RECENT T A X A to the species Equus onager (wild mule) due to the adjective As mentioned above, an attempt was initially made to record ÎygÔTSQoç (wild) and the information about its area of origin, all animals appearing in the texts of the Age of Homer and to somewhere in northern Asia Minor. The known distribution of correlate them to recent taxa. To achieve this goal, according this species covers the area around the Caucasus, the Black Sea, to the historical documentation of Greek classical literature of Anatolia and Iran, although its populations are very restricted that period (Lesky, 1971; Easterling & Knox, 1985), the nowadays due to hunting and habitat destruction. This animal following texts were studied Iliad (I) and Odyssey (O) by was distinguished from „piovoç (mule) which was frequently H om er, Theogony (T), Works and Days (D), Aspis (A) and reported in the epics and was recognized as the hybrid of Equus Catalogue of Women (C) by Hesiod, and the Homeric Hymns asinus and Equus caballus. The animal called qcûSioç (heron) (H) written after Homer’s death. The standard editions of (Iliad, XI.274) was identified as the night heron, Nycticorax Oxford classical texts were used together with valid translations nycticorax since it is reported to appear during the night. Muía in Modern Greek, such as those by Doukas (2000), Lecatsas (fly) was recognized as a species of the family Calliphoridae (1941, Zacharopoulos Press, Athens), and Papaditsas and according to the fact that it lays its eggs on wounds or decaying Ladia (1997, Estia Bookstore Press, Athens). First, all lines were bodies. A p f iypfq was attributed to the wild goat, Capra checked for animal records. The correlation of animal names aegagrus as a result of the description of its habitat (Odyssey, to recent taxa was made possible by combining the informa­ IX.l 18-124) and the length of its horns (Iliad, IV.105). The tion embodied in animal names (most of which have been name Sskcjfiç (dolphin) most possibly corresponds to the most retained in Modern Greek) with morphological descriptions common dolphin species Tursiops truncatus because of its and/or information on the ecology, biology, and behaviour silver colour and the fact that it appears in schools very near 1876 Journal of Biogeography 32, 1875-1882, © 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Greek fauna in the Age of Homer the coast (Aspis, 207-212; Iliad XX.122).
Recommended publications
  • First Record of Angry Worm Eel Skythrenchelys Zabra (Anguilliformes: Ophichthidae) from the East Coast of India
    Indian Journal of Geo Marine Sciences Vol. 48 (04), April 2019, pp. 413-415 First record of angry worm eel Skythrenchelys zabra (Anguilliformes: Ophichthidae) from the east coast of India Anil Mohapatra1*, Dipanjan Ray2, Swarup R. Mohanty1, Subhrendu Sekhar Mishra3, & Rajeeb K. Mohanty4 1Estuarine Biology Regional Centre, Zoological Survey of India, Gopalpur-on-Sea, Ganjam, Odisha 2Bajkul Milani Mahavidyalaya, Kismat Bajkul, Purba Medinipur, West Bengal, India 3Marine Fish Section, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, India 4Indian Institute of Water Management (Indian Council of Agricultural Research), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India *[E-mail: [email protected]] Received 09 November 2017; revised 25 April 2018 Skythrenchelys zabra (Castle and McCosker, 1999) a species belonging to the family Ophichthidae is reported for the first time from the east coast of India on the basis of 11 specimens collected from various fishing harbours along the West Bengal, Odisha and Andhra Pradesh coasts. The species was first described from south-west coast of India in the Arabian Sea. The present report extends the range of distribution of the species to the Bay of Bengal along the east coast of India. [Keywords: Myrophinae; Range extension; New record; Bay of Bengal] Introduction report from the Bay of Bengal filling the gap in The family Ophichthidae (Teleostei: Anguilliformes) its distribution. comprises 337 valid species of which 69 species are in the sub-family Myrophinae and 268 species in Materials and Methods Ophichthinae1. The Myrophinae contains 15 genera2, During the collection of anguilliform fishes along 6 with a moderately developed pectoral fin and 3 with the east coast of India for study of their diversity, four the pectoral fin reduced to a minute flap.
    [Show full text]
  • FAMILY Ophichthidae Gunther, 1870
    FAMILY Ophichthidae Gunther, 1870 - snake eels and worm eels SUBFAMILY Myrophinae Kaup, 1856 - worm eels [=Neenchelidae, Aoteaidae, Muraenichthyidae, Benthenchelyini] Notes: Myrophinae Kaup, 1856a:53 [ref. 2572] (subfamily) Myrophis [also Kaup 1856b:29 [ref. 2573]] Neenchelidae Bamber, 1915:478 [ref. 172] (family) Neenchelys [corrected to Neenchelyidae by Jordan 1923a:133 [ref. 2421], confirmed by Fowler 1934b:163 [ref. 32669], by Myers & Storey 1956:21 [ref. 32831] and by Greenwood, Rosen, Weitzman & Myers 1966:393 [ref. 26856]] Aoteaidae Phillipps, 1926:533 [ref. 6447] (family) Aotea [Gosline 1971:124 [ref. 26857] used Aotidae; family name sometimes seen as Aoteidae or Aoteridae] Muraenichthyidae Whitley, 1955b:110 [ref. 4722] (family) Muraenichthys [name only, used as valid before 2000?; not available] Benthenchelyini McCosker, 1977:13, 57 [ref. 6836] (tribe) Benthenchelys GENUS Ahlia Jordan & Davis, 1891 - worm eels [=Ahlia Jordan [D. S.] & Davis [B. M.], 1891:639] Notes: [ref. 2437]. Fem. Myrophis egmontis Jordan, 1884. Type by original designation (also monotypic). •Valid as Ahlia Jordan & Davis, 1891 -- (McCosker et al. 1989:272 [ref. 13288], McCosker 2003:732 [ref. 26993], McCosker et al. 2012:1191 [ref. 32371]). Current status: Valid as Ahlia Jordan & Davis, 1891. Ophichthidae: Myrophinae. Species Ahlia egmontis (Jordan, 1884) - key worm eel [=Myrophis egmontis Jordan [D. S.], 1884:44, Leptocephalus crenatus Strömman [P. H.], 1896:32, Pl. 3 (figs. 4-5), Leptocephalus hexastigma Regan [C. T.] 1916:141, Pl. 7 (fig. 6), Leptocephalus humilis Strömman [P. H.], 1896:29, Pl. 2 (figs. 7-9), Myrophis macrophthalmus Parr [A. E.], 1930:10, Fig. 1 (bottom), Myrophis microps Parr [A. E.], 1930:11, Fig. 1 (top)] Notes: [Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia v.
    [Show full text]
  • Training Manual Series No.15/2018
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CMFRI Digital Repository DBTR-H D Indian Council of Agricultural Research Ministry of Science and Technology Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute Department of Biotechnology CMFRI Training Manual Series No.15/2018 Training Manual In the frame work of the project: DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals 2015-18 Training Manual In the frame work of the project: DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals 2015-18 Training Manual This is a limited edition of the CMFRI Training Manual provided to participants of the “DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals” organized by the Marine Biotechnology Division of Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI), from 2nd February 2015 - 31st March 2018. Principal Investigator Dr. P. Vijayagopal Compiled & Edited by Dr. P. Vijayagopal Dr. Reynold Peter Assisted by Aditya Prabhakar Swetha Dhamodharan P V ISBN 978-93-82263-24-1 CMFRI Training Manual Series No.15/2018 Published by Dr A Gopalakrishnan Director, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (ICAR-CMFRI) Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute PB.No:1603, Ernakulam North P.O, Kochi-682018, India. 2 Foreword Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI), Kochi along with CIFE, Mumbai and CIFA, Bhubaneswar within the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and Department of Biotechnology of Government of India organized a series of training programs entitled “DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marine Biodiversity and Fisheries Catches of the Pitcairn Island Group
    The Marine Biodiversity and Fisheries Catches of the Pitcairn Island Group THE MARINE BIODIVERSITY AND FISHERIES CATCHES OF THE PITCAIRN ISLAND GROUP M.L.D. Palomares, D. Chaitanya, S. Harper, D. Zeller and D. Pauly A report prepared for the Global Ocean Legacy project of the Pew Environment Group by the Sea Around Us Project Fisheries Centre The University of British Columbia 2202 Main Mall Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z4 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Daniel Pauly RECONSTRUCTION OF TOTAL MARINE FISHERIES CATCHES FOR THE PITCAIRN ISLANDS (1950-2009) ...................................................................................... 3 Devraj Chaitanya, Sarah Harper and Dirk Zeller DOCUMENTING THE MARINE BIODIVERSITY OF THE PITCAIRN ISLANDS THROUGH FISHBASE AND SEALIFEBASE ..................................................................................... 10 Maria Lourdes D. Palomares, Patricia M. Sorongon, Marianne Pan, Jennifer C. Espedido, Lealde U. Pacres, Arlene Chon and Ace Amarga APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................................... 23 APPENDIX 1: FAO AND RECONSTRUCTED CATCH DATA ......................................................................................... 23 APPENDIX 2: TOTAL RECONSTRUCTED CATCH BY MAJOR TAXA ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of the Fish Species (Pisces) of La Réunion, Including a Red List of Threatened and Declining Species
    Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde A, Neue Serie 2: 1–168; Stuttgart, 30.IV.2009. 1 Annotated checklist of the fish species (Pisces) of La Réunion, including a Red List of threatened and declining species RONALD FR ICKE , THIE rr Y MULOCHAU , PA tr ICK DU R VILLE , PASCALE CHABANE T , Emm ANUEL TESSIE R & YVES LE T OU R NEU R Abstract An annotated checklist of the fish species of La Réunion (southwestern Indian Ocean) comprises a total of 984 species in 164 families (including 16 species which are not native). 65 species (plus 16 introduced) occur in fresh- water, with the Gobiidae as the largest freshwater fish family. 165 species (plus 16 introduced) live in transitional waters. In marine habitats, 965 species (plus two introduced) are found, with the Labridae, Serranidae and Gobiidae being the largest families; 56.7 % of these species live in shallow coral reefs, 33.7 % inside the fringing reef, 28.0 % in shallow rocky reefs, 16.8 % on sand bottoms, 14.0 % in deep reefs, 11.9 % on the reef flat, and 11.1 % in estuaries. 63 species are first records for Réunion. Zoogeographically, 65 % of the fish fauna have a widespread Indo-Pacific distribution, while only 2.6 % are Mascarene endemics, and 0.7 % Réunion endemics. The classification of the following species is changed in the present paper: Anguilla labiata (Peters, 1852) [pre- viously A. bengalensis labiata]; Microphis millepunctatus (Kaup, 1856) [previously M. brachyurus millepunctatus]; Epinephelus oceanicus (Lacepède, 1802) [previously E. fasciatus (non Forsskål in Niebuhr, 1775)]; Ostorhinchus fasciatus (White, 1790) [previously Apogon fasciatus]; Mulloidichthys auriflamma (Forsskål in Niebuhr, 1775) [previously Mulloidichthys vanicolensis (non Valenciennes in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1831)]; Stegastes luteobrun- neus (Smith, 1960) [previously S.
    [Show full text]
  • Anguilliformes: Ophichthidae) John E
    Zoological Studies 51(7): 1188-1194 (2012) Pylorobranchus hoi, a New Genus and Species of Myrophine Worm-Eel from Taiwan (Anguilliformes: Ophichthidae) John E. McCosker1, Kar-Hoe Loh2, James Lin3, and Hong-Ming Chen3,4,* 1California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA 2Institute of Ocean and Earth Sciences, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia 3Department of Aquaculture, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 202, Taiwan 4Center of Excellence for Marine Bioenvironment and Biotechnology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 202, Taiwan (Accepted April 6, 2012) John E. McCosker, Kar-Hoe Loh, James Lin, and Hong-Ming Chen (2013) Pylorobranchus hoi, a new genus and species of myrophine worm-eel from Taiwan (Anguilliformes: Ophichthidae). Zoological Studies 51(7): 1188-1194. Pylorobranchus gen. nov. McCosker and Chen is described. It differs from other genera of myrophin ophichthids by possessing a fleshy epidermal lappet in advance of the gill opening, and in the condition of its elevated posterior nostril location, elongated jaws and dentition, its laterally compressed body, and elevated median fins. Pylorobranchus hoi sp. nov. McCosker, Loh and Lin, the type species, is described from 3 specimens caught by hook-and-line off eastern Taiwan. A key to the genera of myrophine ophichthids is provided. http://zoolstud.sinica.edu.tw/Journals/51.7/1188.pdf Key words: Fish taxonomy, Ophichthidae, New genus, Pylorobranchus, New species. The capture and discovery of many new species to be described from Taiwan by Ho et fish species are often the result of the experience, al.). Most myrophin worm-eels and snake-eels knowledge, and enthusiasm of commercial are weak-bodied, small-toothed, shallow-water fishermen.
    [Show full text]
  • View/Download
    ANGUILLIFORMES (part 2) · 1 The ETYFish Project © Christopher Scharpf and Kenneth J. Lazara COMMENTS: v. 27.0 - 12 April 2021 Order ANGUILLIFORMES (part 2 of 3) Family OPHICHTHIDAE Snake Eels and Worm Eels 66 genera/subgenera · 355 species Subfamily Ophichthinae Snake Eels Allips McCosker 1972 allos, another; ips, worm, i.e., a worm-shaped eel in addition to Evips, described in the same paper Allips concolor McCosker 1972 colored uniformly, referring to uniform brown color in isopropanol Aplatophis Böhlke 1956 aplatos, terrible or unapproachable, referring to fearsome appearance of large mouth and “extremely highly developed” dentition; ophis, snake, conventional termination for generic names of snake eels, referring to snake-like shape Aplatophis chauliodus Böhlke 1956 chaulios, referring to deep-sea genus Chauliodus (Stomiidae); odon, tooth, referring to prominent, tusky teeth that both genera feature Aplatophis zorro McCosker & Robertson 2001 “for the remarkable coloration of the pore pattern along the face, reminiscent of the slash mark of the swordsman Zorro” Aprognathodon Böhlke 1967 a-, without; pro-, in front of; gnathos, jaw; odon, tooth, referring to lack of anterior teeth in upper jaw Aprognathodon platyventris Böhlke 1967 platys, flat; ventralis, of the belly, referring to flattened pre-anal region Apterichtus Duméril 1806 a-, without, pteron, fin, referring to absence of fins; ichtus, variant spelling of ichthys, fish Apterichtus anguiformis (Peters 1877) Anguis, slow worm genus; formis, shape, referring to elongate, worm-like
    [Show full text]
  • Involving Snake Eels (Teleostei: Ophichthidae) in Commercially Important Black Jewfish Protonibea Diacanthus (Sciaenidae) and Other Teleost Species
    Memoirs of the Queensland Museum | Nature 62 Queensland Museum Network respectfully acknowledges the Traditional Owners and Custodians of the lands, seas and regions across the state of Queensland. © The State of Queensland, Queensland Museum 2020 PO Box 3300, South Brisbane 4101, Australia Phone 06 7 3840 7555 Fax 06 7 3846 1226 Email [email protected] Website www.qm.qld.gov.au National Library of Australia card number ISSN 0079-8835 Print ISSN 2204-1478 Online NOTE Papers published in this volume and in all previous volumes of the Memoirs of the Queensland Museum may be reproduced for scientific research, individual study or other educational purposes. Properly acknowledged quotations may be made but queries regarding the republication of any papers should be addressed to the Editor in Chief. Copies of the journal can be purchased from the Queensland Museum Shop. A Guide to Authors is displayed at the Queensland Museum web site www.qm.qld.gov.au A Queensland Government Project Typeset at the Queensland Museum Observations of ‘pseudoparasitism’ involving snake eels (Teleostei: Ophichthidae) in commercially important Black Jewfish Protonibea diacanthus (Sciaenidae) and other teleost species Barton, D.P. 1,2,6 Pogonoski, J.J.3 Appleyard, S.A.3 Johnson, J.W.4 Hammer, M.P.5 1. Fisheries Research, Northern Territory Department of Primary Industries & Resources, Berrimah NT; 2. Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT; 3. CSIRO National Research Collections, Australian National Fish Collection, GPO Box 1538 Hobart, Tas; 4. Ichthyology, Queensland Museum, South Brisbane, Qld; 5. Museum and Art Gallery of the Northern Territory, PO Box 4646, Darwin, NT; 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Eels (Orders Anguilliformes and Saccopharyngiformes) from Taiwan
    Zootaxa 4060 (1): 140–189 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4060.1.16 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E57EEA21-F6D3-4032-B7B4-8FAEAD74D574 Annotated checklist of eels (orders Anguilliformes and Saccopharyngiformes) from Taiwan HSUAN-CHING HO1,2, DAVID G. SMITH3, JOHN E. MCCOSKER4, YUSUKE HIBINO5, KAR-HOE LOH6, KENNETH A. TIGHE3 & KWANG-TSAO SHAO7,* 1National Museum of Marine Biology & Aquarium, Pingtung, Taiwan 2Institute of Marine Biology, National Dong Hwa University, Pingtung, Taiwan 3Smithsonian Institution, Museum Support Center, Suitland, MD, U.S.A. 4California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, U.S.A. 5Fisheries Research Laboratory, Mie University, Mie, Japan 6Institute of Ocean and Earth Sciences, University of Malaya, Malaysia 7Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan *Corresponding author. E-mail:[email protected] Abstract An annotated checklist of eels, orders Anguilliformes and Saccopharyngiformes, occurring in Taiwanese waters is pre- sented. The checklist is the result of a series of systematic studies conducted by the authors in the past few years. The eel fauna of Taiwan is one of the richest in the world with a total of 206 species in 74 genera and 13 families in Anguilliformes and a single species in Saccopharyngiformes. The most species-rich families are the Muraenidae with 71 species, followed by the Ophichthidae with 60 species, the Congridae with 29 species, and the Synaphobranchidae with 17 species. More- over, three genera and 42 species have been described based on at least one type specimen collected from Taiwan.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduced Marine Species in Pago Pago Harbor, Fagatele Bay and the National Park Coast, American Samoa
    INTRODUCED MARINE SPECIES IN PAGO PAGO HARBOR, FAGATELE BAY AND THE NATIONAL PARK COAST, AMERICAN SAMOA December 2003 COVER Typical views of benthic organisms from sampling areas (clockwise from upper left): Fouling organisms on debris at Pago Pago Harbor Dry Dock; Acropora hyacinthus tables in Fagetele Bay; Porites rus colonies in Fagasa Bay; Mixed branching and tabular Acropora in Vatia Bay INTRODUCED MARINE SPECIES IN PAGO PAGO HARBOR, FAGATELE BAY AND THE NATIONAL PARK COAST, AMERICAN SAMOA Final report prepared for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fagetele Bay Marine Sanctuary, National Park of American Samoa and American Samoa Department of Marine and Natural Resources. S. L. Coles P. R. Reath P. A. Skelton V. Bonito R. C. DeFelice L. Basch Bishop Museum Pacific Biological Survey Bishop Museum Technical Report No 26 Honolulu Hawai‘i December 2003 Published by Bishop Museum Press 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i Copyright © 2003 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America ISSN 1085-455X Contribution No. 2003-007 to the Pacific Biological Survey EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The biological communities at ten sites around the Island of Tutuila, American Samoa were surveyed in October 2002 by a team of four investigators. Diving observations and collections of benthic observations using scuba and snorkel were made at six stations in Pago Pago Harbor, two stations in Fagatele Bay, and one station each in Vatia Bay and Fagasa Bay. The purpose of this survey was to determine the full complement of organisms greater than 0.5 mm in size, including benthic algae, macroinvertebrates and fishes, occurring at each site, and to evaluate the presence and potential impact of nonindigenous (introduced) marine species.
    [Show full text]
  • New Species of the Snake Eels Echelus and Ophichthus (Anguilliformes: Ophichthidae) from Taiwan
    Zootaxa 4060 (1): 071–085 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4060.1.11 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4ECBC9B2-D644-4FB2-BC1A-F67D0B97B474 New species of the snake eels Echelus and Ophichthus (Anguilliformes: Ophichthidae) from Taiwan JOHN E. McCOSKER1 & HSUAN-CHING HO2,3,* 1California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, California 94118-4503, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 2National Museum of Marine Biology and Aquarium, Pingtung, Taiwan 3Institute of Marine Biology, National Dong Hwa University, Pingtung, Taiwan. E-mail: [email protected] *Corresponding author Abstract Three new species of ophichthid eels, subfamily Ophichthinae, are described and illustrated from specimens collected at fish markets in Taiwan. Included are: Echelus polyspondylus sp. nov., which is unique in its vertebral number (172–183), dorsal-fin origin (behind gill openings), and coloration (anal-fin membrane black posteriorly); Ophichthus bicolor sp. nov., which is unique in its mean vertebral formula (18-64-158), dorsal-fin origin (well behind gill openings), dentition (teeth large and conical), and contrasting coloration (tan dorsally, white ventrally); and O. shaoi sp. nov., which is unique in its mean vertebral formula (11-69-159), and prominent lip barbels. A key to Taiwanese species of Echelus and Ophich- thus is provided. Key words: Taxonomy, Pisces, Teleostei, Ophichthidae, new species Introduction Knowledge of the worm eels and snake eels of the family Ophichthidae has increased dramatically in this century. Chen & Weng’s (1967) seminal study of the Apodal Fishes of Taiwan listed 15 species distributed among 9 genera.
    [Show full text]
  • (Ophichthidae: Myrophinae) from East Coast of India, Bay of Bengal
    Indian Journal of Geo Marine Sciences Vol. 48 (03), March 2019, pp. 283-285 First record of Muraenichthys gymnopterus (Ophichthidae: Myrophinae) from east coast of India, Bay of Bengal Anil Mohapatra1*, Dipanjan Ray2, & Subhrendu Sekhar Mishra3 1Estuarine Biology Regional Centre, Zoological Survey of India, Gopalpur-on-Sea, Ganjam, Odisha 2 Bajkul Milani Mahavidyalaya, Kismat Bajkul, Purba Medinipur, West Bengal, India 3Marine Fish Section, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata *[E-mail: [email protected]] Received 05 August 2017; revised 22 November 2018 Muraenichthys gymnopterus (Bleeker, 1853) is reported for the first time from seven specimens collected from the Shankarpur fishing harbour (West Bengal), Visakhapatnam fishing harbour (Andhra Pradesh), and Chilika lagoon (Odisha). This paper reports Muraenichthys gymnopterus for the first time from the east coast of India as well as from Chilika lagoon. [Keywords: Anguilliformes; Chilika lagoon; West Bengal coast; Andhra Pradesh coast] Introduction (Bleeker, 1853) has been recorded from Mumbai9, The snake eel and worm eel fish family while M. schultzei Bleeker, 1857 from Andaman Ophichthidae comprises 59 genera. Among these, 45 Islands10 and from Rupan, Okha and Kiew Point genera belong to the subfamily Ophichthinae (tail tip (Gujarat coast)11. During the collection of fishes from hard, pointed and finless; known as snake eels) 1-3 and the east coast of India for the study of the 14 genera to the subfamily Myrophinae (tail tip Anguilliform eel diversity in Indian waters, seven flexible and confluent with dorsal and anal fins; specimens of eels belonging to the genus known as worm eel) 4-5. All together, they comprise Muraenichthys were collected and identification more than 260 species in the family Ophichthidae, confirmed as M.
    [Show full text]