Benthic Habitats and Biodiversity of the Dampier and Montebello Australian Marine Parks

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Benthic Habitats and Biodiversity of the Dampier and Montebello Australian Marine Parks CSIRO OCEANS & ATMOSPHERE Benthic habitats and biodiversity of the Dampier and Montebello Australian Marine Parks Edited by: John Keesing, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere Research March 2019 ISBN 978-1-4863-1225-2 Print 978-1-4863-1226-9 On-line Contributors The following people contributed to this study. Affiliation is CSIRO unless otherwise stated. WAM = Western Australia Museum, MV = Museum of Victoria, DPIRD = Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development Study design and operational execution: John Keesing, Nick Mortimer, Stephen Newman (DPIRD), Roland Pitcher, Keith Sainsbury (SainsSolutions), Joanna Strzelecki, Corey Wakefield (DPIRD), John Wakeford (Fishing Untangled), Alan Williams Field work: Belinda Alvarez, Dion Boddington (DPIRD), Monika Bryce, Susan Cheers, Brett Chrisafulli (DPIRD), Frances Cooke, Frank Coman, Christopher Dowling (DPIRD), Gary Fry, Cristiano Giordani (Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia), Alastair Graham, Mark Green, Qingxi Han (Ningbo University, China), John Keesing, Peter Karuso (Macquarie University), Matt Lansdell, Maylene Loo, Hector Lozano‐Montes, Huabin Mao (Chinese Academy of Sciences), Margaret Miller, Nick Mortimer, James McLaughlin, Amy Nau, Kate Naughton (MV), Tracee Nguyen, Camilla Novaglio, John Pogonoski, Keith Sainsbury (SainsSolutions), Craig Skepper (DPIRD), Joanna Strzelecki, Tonya Van Der Velde, Alan Williams Taxonomy and contributions to Chapter 4: Belinda Alvarez, Sharon Appleyard, Monika Bryce, Alastair Graham, Qingxi Han (Ningbo University, China), Glad Hansen (WAM), Ana Hara (WAM), Andrew Hosie (WAM), John Huisman (WA Herbarium), Lisa Kirkendale (WAM), Margaret Miller, Hugh Morrison (WAM), Kate Naughton (MV), Tim O’Hara (MV), John Pogonoski, Keith Sainsbury (SainsSolutions), Corey Whisson (WAM), Nerida Wilson (WAM) Data analysis, contributions to other chapters and report preparation: Belinda Alvarez, Monika Bryce, Norm Campbell, Frances Cooke, John Keesing, Margaret Miller, Nick Mortimer, James McLaughlin, Amy Nau, John Pogonoski, Dirk Slawinski, Joanna Strzelecki, Melanie Trapon, Emma Westlake Citation for this report Keesing, J.K. (Ed.) 2019. Benthic habitats and biodiversity of the Dampier and Montebello Australian Marine Parks. Report for the Director of National Parks. CSIRO, Australia. Individual sections of Chapter 4 maybe cited as in the following example: Hosie, A. and Hara, A. 2019. Crustaceans, pp 135‐147, in Keesing, J.K. (Ed.) 2019. Benthic habitats and biodiversity of the Dampier and Montebello Australian Marine Parks. Report for the Director of National Parks. CSIRO, Australia. Copyright © Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation 2019. To the extent permitted by law, all rights are reserved and no part of this publication covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means except with the written permission of CSIRO. Important disclaimer CSIRO advises that the information contained in this publication comprises general statements based on scientific research. The reader is advised and needs to be aware that such information may be incomplete or unable to be used in any specific situation. No reliance or actions must therefore be made on that information without seeking prior expert professional, scientific and technical advice. To the extent permitted by law, CSIRO (including its employees and consultants) excludes all liability to any person for any consequences, including but not limited to all losses, damages, costs, expenses and any other compensation, arising directly or indirectly from using this publication (in part or in whole) and any information or material contained in it. CSIRO is committed to providing web accessible content wherever possible. If you are having difficulties with accessing this document please contact [email protected]. Contents Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................................... 14 Executive summary ....................................................................................................................... 15 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 20 1.1 Voyage summary, survey design and research methods .................................... 20 1.2 Operations undertaken ....................................................................................... 22 2 Habitat assessment: bathymetry, sub‐bottom profiling and acoustic backscatter ......... 24 2.1 Bathymetry .......................................................................................................... 24 2.2 Acoustic backscatter and sub‐bottom profiling .................................................. 34 2.3 Water column sampling ...................................................................................... 48 3 Habitat assessment: benthic substrate and biota ............................................................ 53 3.1 Data sources ........................................................................................................ 53 3.2 Benthic substrate and topography ...................................................................... 57 3.3 Benthic Biota ....................................................................................................... 67 4 Biodiversity assessment .................................................................................................... 91 4.1 Overview .............................................................................................................. 91 4.2 Fishes ................................................................................................................... 91 4.3 Corals (Octocorallia, Hexacorallia, Ceriantipatharia) ........................................ 111 4.4 Sponges.............................................................................................................. 120 4.5 Crustaceans ....................................................................................................... 136 4.6 Molluscs ............................................................................................................. 149 4.7 Echinoderms ...................................................................................................... 160 4.8 Sea snakes ......................................................................................................... 171 4.9 Turtles ................................................................................................................ 171 4.10 Algae and seagrass ............................................................................................ 171 4.11 Other taxa .......................................................................................................... 174 5 Comparison of Montebello MP with the adjacent Pilbara Fish Trawl Fishery Area 1 .... 177 5.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 177 5.2 Habitat and benthic biota comparisons ............................................................ 180 5.3 Comparison of fish communities: species assemblages and diversity .............. 187 5.4 Comparison of fish communities: biomass ....................................................... 196 Benthic habitats and biodiversity of the Dampier and Montebello Australian Marine Parks | 1 5.5 Comparison of soft coral diversity..................................................................... 203 5.6 Association of demersal fish assemblages and benthic filter feeder communities ................................................................................................................... 204 Appendix A Detailed description of survey design and methodology ................................. 208 Appendix B Detailed list of operations by date, site and gear type taken in the Dampier and Montebello Marine Parks ........................................................................................................... 217 Appendix C Full Species list of fish caught on the NWS on the RV Investigator voyage in 2017 (INV2017_05) 219 Appendix D Data tables giving site locations referred to in this report ............................... 227 Appendix E Tables giving sponge and soft coral abundance and biomass data referred to in Chapter 5 230 References 237 2 | Benthic habitats and biodiversity of the Dampier and Montebello Australian Marine Parks Figures Figure 1. Map of survey area showing survey stations and vessel track (continuous swathing) and location of Commonwealth and State MPAs. ........................................................................ 21 Figure 2. Location of sites surveyed and swath mapping carried out within the Dampier MP. .. 22 Figure 3. Location of sites surveyed and swath mapping carried out within the Montebello MP. ................................................................................................................................................ 23 Figure 4. Location, zoning and bathymetry of Dampier MP. From the North‐west Marine Parks Network Management Plan 2018 ................................................................................................. 25 Figure 5. Gridded bathymetry of broader area around Dampier MP (Geosciences Australia 2009 gridded product) overlain with the swath lines from INV2017_05 (sites W4, W6, W8) plus previous voyages in the area which can be seen to the north
Recommended publications
  • Pacific Plate Biogeography, with Special Reference to Shorefishes
    Pacific Plate Biogeography, with Special Reference to Shorefishes VICTOR G. SPRINGER m SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • NUMBER 367 SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of "diffusing knowledge" was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the Institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoo/ogy Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the world cf science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the world. Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where the manuscripts are given substantive review.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 New Mediterranean Biodiversity Records
    Mediterranean Marine Science Vol. 17, 2016 New Mediterranean Biodiversity Records (November, 2016) MYTILINEOU CH. Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland Waters, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, GR-19013, Anavyssos AKEL E.H.Kh. Fishery Biology Lab, National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries Kait-Bey, Alexandria BABALI N. National Research Center for Developing of Fisheries and Aquaculture / National College of Marines Sciences and Coastal Management BALISTRERI P. Vicolo Giotto 6, 91023, Favignana BARICHE M. Department of Biology, American University of Beirut, PO Box 11-0236, Beirut 1107 2020 BOYACI Y.Ö. Eğirdir Fisheries Faculty, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta CILENTI L. Istituto di Scienze Marine, C.N.R, UOS Lesina, Via Pola, 4, 71010 Lesina (FG) CONSTANTINOU C. Τhessalonikis 15, Agios Dometios, 2363, Nicosia CROCETTA F. Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland Waters, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, GR-19013, Anavyssos ÇELİK M. Faculty of Fisheries, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, 48000, Kötekli, Muğla DERELI H. Faculty of Fisheries, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir DOUNAS C. Institute of Marine Biology, Biotechnology and Aquaculture, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, 71003 Heraklion, Kriti DURUCAN F. Eğirdir Fisheries Faculty, http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 10/04/2020 10:21:52 | Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta GARRIDO A. Agencia de Gestión Agraria y Pesquera de Andalucía, Ctra. de Cártama, km 12, 29591 Santa Rosalía, Campanillas, Málaga GEROVASILEIOU V. Institute of Marine Biology, Biotechnology and Aquaculture, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, 71003 Heraklion, Kriti KAPIRIS K. Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland Waters, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, GR-19013, Anavyssos KEBAPCIOGLU T.
    [Show full text]
  • Acanthopterygii, Bone, Eurypterygii, Osteology, Percomprpha
    Research in Zoology 2014, 4(2): 29-42 DOI: 10.5923/j.zoology.20140402.01 Comparative Osteology of the Jaws in Representatives of the Eurypterygian Fishes Yazdan Keivany Department of Natural Resources (Fisheries Division), Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, 84156-83111, Iran Abstract The osteology of the jaws in representatives of 49 genera in 40 families of eurypterygian fishes, including: Aulopiformes, Myctophiformes, Lampridiformes, Polymixiiformes, Percopsiformes, Mugiliformes, Atheriniformes, Beloniformes, Cyprinodontiformes, Stephanoberyciformes, Beryciformes, Zeiformes, Gasterosteiformes, Synbranchiformes, Scorpaeniformes (including Dactylopteridae), and Perciformes (including Elassomatidae) were studied. Generally, in this group, the upper jaw consists of the premaxilla, maxilla, and supramaxilla. The lower jaw consists of the dentary, anguloarticular, retroarticular, and sesamoid articular. In higher taxa, the premaxilla bears ascending, articular, and postmaxillary processes. The maxilla usually bears a ventral and a dorsal articular process. The supramaxilla is present only in some taxa. The dentary is usually toothed and bears coronoid and posteroventral processes. The retroarticular is small and located at the posteroventral corner of the anguloarticular. Keywords Acanthopterygii, Bone, Eurypterygii, Osteology, Percomprpha following method for clearing and staining bone and 1. Introduction cartilage provided in reference [18]. A camera lucida attached to a Wild M5 dissecting stereomicroscope was used Despite the introduction of modern techniques such as to prepare the drawings. The bones in the first figure of each DNA sequencing and barcoding, osteology, due to its anatomical section are arbitrarily shaded and labeled and in reliability, still plays an important role in the systematic the others are shaded in a consistent manner (dark, medium, study of fishes and comprises a major percent of today’s and clear) to facilitate comparison among the taxa.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Transformative Forces of Aquaculture in the Marine Aquarium Trade
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library Summer 8-22-2020 Senders, Receivers, and Spillover Dynamics: Understanding Transformative Forces of Aquaculture in the Marine Aquarium Trade Bryce Risley University of Maine, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Risley, Bryce, "Senders, Receivers, and Spillover Dynamics: Understanding Transformative Forces of Aquaculture in the Marine Aquarium Trade" (2020). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3314. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/3314 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SENDERS, RECEIVERS, AND SPILLOVER DYNAMICS: UNDERSTANDING TRANSFORMATIVE FORCES OF AQUACULTURE IN THE MARINE AQUARIUM TRADE By Bryce Risley B.S. University of New Mexico, 2014 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science (in Marine Policy and Marine Biology) The Graduate School The University of Maine May 2020 Advisory Committee: Joshua Stoll, Assistant Professor of Marine Policy, Co-advisor Nishad Jayasundara, Assistant Professor of Marine Biology, Co-advisor Aaron Strong, Assistant Professor of Environmental Studies (Hamilton College) Christine Beitl, Associate Professor of Anthropology Douglas Rasher, Senior Research Scientist of Marine Ecology (Bigelow Laboratory) Heather Hamlin, Associate Professor of Marine Biology No photograph in this thesis may be used in another work without written permission from the photographer.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I. an Annotated Checklist of Extant Brachyuran Crabs of the World
    THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2008 17: 1–286 Date of Publication: 31 Jan.2008 © National University of Singapore SYSTEMA BRACHYURORUM: PART I. AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF EXTANT BRACHYURAN CRABS OF THE WORLD Peter K. L. Ng Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore Email: [email protected] Danièle Guinot Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Département Milieux et peuplements aquatiques, 61 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France Email: [email protected] Peter J. F. Davie Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. – An annotated checklist of the extant brachyuran crabs of the world is presented for the first time. Over 10,500 names are treated including 6,793 valid species and subspecies (with 1,907 primary synonyms), 1,271 genera and subgenera (with 393 primary synonyms), 93 families and 38 superfamilies. Nomenclatural and taxonomic problems are reviewed in detail, and many resolved. Detailed notes and references are provided where necessary. The constitution of a large number of families and superfamilies is discussed in detail, with the positions of some taxa rearranged in an attempt to form a stable base for future taxonomic studies. This is the first time the nomenclature of any large group of decapod crustaceans has been examined in such detail. KEY WORDS. – Annotated checklist, crabs of the world, Brachyura, systematics, nomenclature. CONTENTS Preamble .................................................................................. 3 Family Cymonomidae .......................................... 32 Caveats and acknowledgements ............................................... 5 Family Phyllotymolinidae .................................... 32 Introduction .............................................................................. 6 Superfamily DROMIOIDEA ..................................... 33 The higher classification of the Brachyura ........................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Risk Limits for Triphenyltin in Water
    Environmental risk limits for triphenyltin in water RIVM report 601714018/2012 R. van Herwijnen | C.T.A. Moermond | P.L.A. van Vlaardingen | F.M.W. de Jong | E.M.J. Verbruggen National Institute for Public Health and the Environment P.O. Box 1 | 3720 BA Bilthoven www.rivm.com Environmental risk limits for triphenyltin in water RIVM Report 601714018/2012 RIVM Report 601714018 Colophon © RIVM 2012 Parts of this publication may be reproduced, provided acknowledgement is given to the 'National Institute for Public Health and the Environment', along with the title and year of publication. R. van Herwijnen C.T.A. Moermond P.L.A. van Vlaardingen F.M.W. de Jong E.M.J. Verbruggen Contact: René van Herwijnen Expertise Centre for Substances [email protected] This investigation has been performed by order and for the account of the Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, Directorate for Sustainability, within the framework of the project 'Chemical aspects of the Water Framework Directive and the Directive on Priority Substances'. Page 2 of 104 RIVM Report 601714018 Abstract Environmental risk limits for triphenyltin in water RIVM has, by order of the Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, derived environmental risk limits for triphenyltin. This was necessary because the current risk limts have not been derived according to the most recent methodology. Main uses of triphenyltin were for wood preservation and as antifouling on ships. The use as antifouling has been banned within Europe since 2003. The Dutch Steering Committee for Substances will set new standards on the basis of the scientific advisory values in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Classification of the Xanthoidea Sensu Lato
    Contributions to Zoology, 75 (1/2) 23-73 (2006) A new classifi cation of the Xanthoidea sensu lato (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura) based on phylogenetic analysis and traditional systematics and evaluation of all fossil Xanthoidea sensu lato Hiroaki Karasawa1, Carrie E. Schweitzer2 1Mizunami Fossil Museum, Yamanouchi, Akeyo, Mizunami, Gifu 509-6132, Japan, e-mail: GHA06103@nifty. com; 2Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave. NW, North Canton, Ohio 44720, USA, e-mail: [email protected] Key words: Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura, Xanthoidea, Portunidae, systematics, phylogeny Abstract Family Pilumnidae ............................................................. 47 Family Pseudorhombilidae ............................................... 49 A phylogenetic analysis was conducted including representatives Family Trapeziidae ............................................................. 49 from all recognized extant and extinct families of the Xanthoidea Family Xanthidae ............................................................... 50 sensu lato, resulting in one new family, Hypothalassiidae. Four Superfamily Xanthoidea incertae sedis ............................... 50 xanthoid families are elevated to superfamily status, resulting in Superfamily Eriphioidea ......................................................... 51 Carpilioidea, Pilumnoidoidea, Eriphioidea, Progeryonoidea, and Family Platyxanthidae ....................................................... 52 Goneplacoidea, and numerous subfamilies are elevated
    [Show full text]
  • Adec Preview Generated PDF File
    Rec. West. Aust. Mus., 1977,6 (1) FIVE PROBABLE HYBRID BUTTERFLYFISHES OF THE GENUS CHAETODON FROM THE CENTRAL AND WESTERN PACIFIC JOHN E. RANDALL* GERALD R. ALLENt and ROGERC. STEENEf [Received 19 September 1976. Accepted 5 May 1977. Published 30 December 1977.] ABSTRACT The following five cases of probable hybridisation in marine butterflyfishes (genus Chaetodon) are reported: C. auriga x C. ephippium (Tuamotu Archipelago), C. ephippium x C. semeion (Marshall Islands), C. kleini x C. unimaculatus (Marshall Islands), C. miliaris x C. tinkeri (Hawaiian Islands), and C. aureofasciatus x C. rainfordi (Great Barrier Reef). Comparisons between the presumed hybrids and their respective parent species are presented, and each trio is illustrated. In addition, a discussion of possible conditions responsible for hybridisation in chaetodontids is included. INTRODUCTION Relatively few marine fishes have been reported as hybrids; of 212 fish hybrids listed by Slastenenko (1957), only 30 were inhabitants of the sea. The same preponderance of freshwater hybrids over marine is apparent in the review by Schwartz (1972) of the hybrid fishes of the world. In the present paper data are given for five presumed hybrids of the marine butterflyfish genus Chaetodon (family Chaetodontidae). In addition, the junior authors have observed (but not collected) probable hybrid crosses between C. ornatissimus - C. meyeri and C. pelewensis - C. punctatofasciatus at Palau, New Britain, and the northern Great Barrier Reef. *Bernice P. Bishop Museum, P.O. Box 6037, Honolulu, Hawaii 96818, D.S.A. tWestern Australian Museum, Francis Street, Perth, Australia 6000. fp.o. Box 188, Cairns, Queensland, Australia 4870. 3 Chaetodontids have not been reported previou~ly as hybrids, although this phenomenon has been documented in the closely related angelfishes (Pomacanthidae).
    [Show full text]
  • Order GASTEROSTEIFORMES PEGASIDAE Eurypegasus Draconis
    click for previous page 2262 Bony Fishes Order GASTEROSTEIFORMES PEGASIDAE Seamoths (seadragons) by T.W. Pietsch and W.A. Palsson iagnostic characters: Small fishes (to 18 cm total length); body depressed, completely encased in Dfused dermal plates; tail encircled by 8 to 14 laterally articulating, or fused, bony rings. Nasal bones elongate, fused, forming a rostrum; mouth inferior. Gill opening restricted to a small hole on dorsolat- eral surface behind head. Spinous dorsal fin absent; soft dorsal and anal fins each with 5 rays, placed posteriorly on body. Caudal fin with 8 unbranched rays. Pectoral fins large, wing-like, inserted horizon- tally, composed of 9 to 19 unbranched, soft or spinous-soft rays; pectoral-fin rays interconnected by broad, transparent membranes. Pelvic fins thoracic, tentacle-like,withI spine and 2 or 3 unbranched soft rays. Colour: in life highly variable, apparently capable of rapid colour change to match substrata; head and body light to dark brown, olive-brown, reddish brown, or almost black, with dorsal and lateral surfaces usually darker than ventral surface; dorsal and lateral body surface often with fine, dark brown reticulations or mottled lines, sometimes with irregular white or yellow blotches; tail rings often encircled with dark brown bands; pectoral fins with broad white outer margin and small brown spots forming irregular, longitudinal bands; unpaired fins with small brown spots in irregular rows. dorsal view lateral view Habitat, biology, and fisheries: Benthic, found on sand, gravel, shell-rubble, or muddy bottoms. Collected incidentally by seine, trawl, dredge, or shrimp nets; postlarvae have been taken at surface lights at night.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Presence of Chitinases in the Digestive Tract and Their Relationship to Diet and Morphology in Freshwater Fish
    Assessing the Presence of Chitinases in the Digestive Tract and their Relationship to Diet and Morphology in Freshwater Fish Word count: 25 157 Andy Vervaet Student number: 01000500 Supervisor: Prof. dr. Ir. Geert Janssens Supervisor: Dr. Arturo Muñoz Saravia A dissertation submitted to Ghent University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Veterinary Medicine Academic year: 2018 - 2019 Ghent University, its employees and/or students, give no warranty that the information provided in this thesis is accurate or exhaustive, nor that the content of this thesis will not constitute or result in any infringement of third-party rights. Ghent University, its employees and/or students do not accept any liability or responsibility for any use which may be made of the content or information given in the thesis, nor for any reliance which may be placed on any advice or information provided in this thesis. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Writing this work would not have been possible without all the guidance, help and motivation I received during the process. I offer my sincerest gratitude to all the people who played a role in finishing the thesis. First, I would like to thank both my promotors; prof. dr. ir. Geert Janssens and dr. Arturo Muñoz Saravia. For offering me the opportunity to work on this exciting subject and allowing me to get an invaluable experience of learning to work in challenging conditions abroad. Their guidance and expertise on different issues were integral to finishing this work. Secondly, I would like to thank all the people who helped me during certain parts of the study; the people at IDP-Pacu who made their lab facilities for me in Bolivia, Donna Vanhauteghem for helping me to process my samples, and Stefania Magnusdottir and Joanna Wolthuis of UMC Utrecht for performing the data analysis of the DI-MS samples.
    [Show full text]
  • FAMILY Ophichthidae Gunther, 1870
    FAMILY Ophichthidae Gunther, 1870 - snake eels and worm eels SUBFAMILY Myrophinae Kaup, 1856 - worm eels [=Neenchelidae, Aoteaidae, Muraenichthyidae, Benthenchelyini] Notes: Myrophinae Kaup, 1856a:53 [ref. 2572] (subfamily) Myrophis [also Kaup 1856b:29 [ref. 2573]] Neenchelidae Bamber, 1915:478 [ref. 172] (family) Neenchelys [corrected to Neenchelyidae by Jordan 1923a:133 [ref. 2421], confirmed by Fowler 1934b:163 [ref. 32669], by Myers & Storey 1956:21 [ref. 32831] and by Greenwood, Rosen, Weitzman & Myers 1966:393 [ref. 26856]] Aoteaidae Phillipps, 1926:533 [ref. 6447] (family) Aotea [Gosline 1971:124 [ref. 26857] used Aotidae; family name sometimes seen as Aoteidae or Aoteridae] Muraenichthyidae Whitley, 1955b:110 [ref. 4722] (family) Muraenichthys [name only, used as valid before 2000?; not available] Benthenchelyini McCosker, 1977:13, 57 [ref. 6836] (tribe) Benthenchelys GENUS Ahlia Jordan & Davis, 1891 - worm eels [=Ahlia Jordan [D. S.] & Davis [B. M.], 1891:639] Notes: [ref. 2437]. Fem. Myrophis egmontis Jordan, 1884. Type by original designation (also monotypic). •Valid as Ahlia Jordan & Davis, 1891 -- (McCosker et al. 1989:272 [ref. 13288], McCosker 2003:732 [ref. 26993], McCosker et al. 2012:1191 [ref. 32371]). Current status: Valid as Ahlia Jordan & Davis, 1891. Ophichthidae: Myrophinae. Species Ahlia egmontis (Jordan, 1884) - key worm eel [=Myrophis egmontis Jordan [D. S.], 1884:44, Leptocephalus crenatus Strömman [P. H.], 1896:32, Pl. 3 (figs. 4-5), Leptocephalus hexastigma Regan [C. T.] 1916:141, Pl. 7 (fig. 6), Leptocephalus humilis Strömman [P. H.], 1896:29, Pl. 2 (figs. 7-9), Myrophis macrophthalmus Parr [A. E.], 1930:10, Fig. 1 (bottom), Myrophis microps Parr [A. E.], 1930:11, Fig. 1 (top)] Notes: [Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia v.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Shore and Epipelagic Fishes of Tonga
    ATOLL RESEARCH BULLETIN NO. 502 CHECKLIST OF THE SHORE AND EPIPEGAGIC FISHES OF TONGA BY JOHN E. RANDALL, JEFFREY T. WILLIAMS, DAVID G. SMITH, MICHEL KULBICKI, GERALD MOU THAM, PIERRE LABROSSE, MECKI KRONEN, ERIC CLUA, AND BRADLEY S. MANN ISSUEDBY NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION WASHINGTON, D.C., U.S.A. AUGUST2003 Niuafo'ov 0 }•lohi lliualoputapu ............ ~-··-···~~-·--~~.-.'!- ... ~"-"'~-- .. ~---- ...... -~---'*----·- .. '18 Fonualei ... · Tolw 1. SOUTH PACIFIC V A V A 'U GR 0 U P! . ; i 0 C.E AN 1 1 l 1 ---20 ; Nomuka l.':l , 1 ,;} NdfUKA ·oru(roLo GrOUP GRQUP 1 ~.,,,,, t j Tongatapu u \; 1 !rONGATAPU ~·Euil ! GROUP ~ 1 i ' ----- ...... J .. .,........ "' ....... Sl.~----·--····· ..... i ~ONGA l ir Capltal city J 0 110 lOOiGI~ 1 1 ___ ,·--·-1--· """"--··--···--.............. ______ ...... .. Figure 1. The Kingdom of Tonga. CHECKLIST OF THE SHORE AND EPIPELAGIC FISHES OF TONGA BY 1 2 2 JOHN E. RANDALL , JEFFREY T. WILLIAMS , DAVID G. SMITH , MICHEL 3 3 4 4 KULBICKI , GERALD MOU THAM , PIERRE LABROSSE , MEC KI KRONEN , 4 5 ERIC CLUA , and BRADLEY S. MANN ABSTRACT A checklist is given below of 1162 species of shore and epipelagic fishes belonging to 111 families that occur in the islands of Tonga, South Pacifie Ocean; 40 of these are epipelagic species. As might be expected, the fish fauna of Tonga is most similar to those of Samoa and Fiji; at least 658 species of the fishes found in Tonga are also known from Fiji and the islands of Samoa. Twelve species of shore fishes are presently known only from Tonga. Specimens of Tongan fishes are housed mainly in the fish collections of the National Museum ofNatural History, Washington D.C.; Bernice P.
    [Show full text]