Lincoln and the Baltimore Plot, 1861 W HUNTINGTON LIBRARY PUBLICATIONS Cartoon by A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lincoln and the Baltimore Plot, 1861 W HUNTINGTON LIBRARY PUBLICATIONS Cartoon by A M MDG E 457.4 .C88 1949 Md. 923.173 L73 Cuthbert, Norma Barrett, 1892- Lincoln and the Baltimore plot, 1861 w HUNTINGTON LIBRARY PUBLICATIONS Cartoon by A. VOLCK, from the Huntington Library LINCOLN AND THE BALTIMORE PLOT a I 8 6 i; From Pinkerton Records and Related Papers Edited by NORMA B. CUTHBERT THE HUNTINGTON LIBRARY SAN MARINO • CALIFORNIA 1949 Copyright 1949 by the HENRY E. HUNTINGTON LIBRARY & ART GALLERY PRINTED BY PACIFIC PRESS INC. LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This book has been in preparation for a long time, during odd moments snatched from routine duties in the Depart- ment of Manuscripts in the Huntdngton Library. A definitive investigation of the Baltimore plot has not been possible, and in only two libraries, other than our own, has research been done: the New York Public Library and the Library of Congress. Nonetheless much help has been given and received. To my friends in San Marino, Messrs. Herbert C. Schulz, Robert G. Cleland, Godfrey Davies, Dixon Wecter, and Mrs. Marion Tinling; to the staff of the Library of Congress, particularly Dr. C. P. Powell; to Messrs. Robert A. Pinkerton and Ralph Dudley who have been so very generous in making available every resource of Pinkerton's National Detective Agency, even to the extent of shipping to California valuable archives of the firm; to Dr. Louis B. Wright, Director of the Folger Library; and finally to Mr. Lavern M. Hamand and Pro- fessor James G. Randall of the University of Illinois, I am deeply indebted, and offer my sincere and grateful thanks. N.B.C. Vll CONTENTS Introduction xi I. Pinkerton's Account of the Plot, 1866 .... 1 II. Allan Pinkerton's Record Book, 1861 .... 19 III. Judd's Account of the Plot, 1866 107 IV. Ward H. Lamon and the Baltimore Plot ... 114 Notes . 124 Bibliography 153 Index 155 IX INTRODUCTION On February nth, 1861, Abraham Lincoln started on his journey from Springfield to Washington to be inaugu- rated President of the United States. The train was to leave at eight o'clock in the morning, and Lincoln allowed himself five minutes to say good-by to the friends and neighbors who had gathered at the Great Western Railway station to see him off. It was a sorrowful leavetaking. His words are well remembered: "No one, not in my position can appreciate my feeling of sadness at this parting . Here I have lived a quarter of a century . Here my children have been born, and one is buried. I now leave, not knowing when or whether ever I may return . ." J. G. Nicolay and young John Hay, who were present, said the morning was stormy, with snow settling on the bared heads of the townsfolk. Henry Villard, reporter for the New York Associated Press, remembered it as a clear, crisp day. And Ward H. Lamon, Lincoln's intimate friend and former law partner, described it as a gloomy day with heavy clouds overhead and a cold rain falling. But whatever the weather, it was a portentous day: not alone because it marked the end of an epoch in Lincoln's life, but because it also introduced one of the most tedious and difficult interludes he ever lived through. The tri- umphal progression from Springfield to Washington was a travesty—a fortnight of tense anxiety masked by levity and noisy ovations, by cautious commonplace speech- making, the so-popular routine of "measuring" contests, the ordeal of social amenities, the incessant handshaking, and finally, as a nightmarish climax, a sudden midnight trip xi Xll INTRODUCTION through Baltimore, which brought him into Washington secretly and ahead of schedule. While all this was going on, the people who were not shouting in the streets waited—watching and listening as the crack along the Mason-Dixon line grew steadily wider, and the accompanying rumblings became louder. These signs and portents were not a sudden development. For a long time a strong aggressive element in the South had openly threatened the dissolution of the Union. Now these threats were attended by rumors of an uglier, more sinister character. In Springfield as well as in Washington dark hints and prophecies passed from lip to lip. It was whispered that there was a plan to kill General Scott and kidnap President Buchanan, to blow up the Capitol and seize the arsenal and navy yard; that Washington soon would be isolated, with railroad tracks torn up, bridges burned, tele- graph wires destroyed; that armed secret societies were springing up throughout Virginia, Maryland, and the Dis- trict of Columbia, ready and geared for action; that black lists were being prepared in anticipation of a coup d'etat; that arms and ammunition, concealed in trunks and carpet- bags, were being quietly distributed to householders; that District militia and police were largely disaffected, as well as government officials from the Cabinet down—in short, that a reign of terror could, and probably would, break out at a moment's notice. By the close of i860, whispering had given way to open street-corner discussions, and all the foamy harroom rumors seemed to be boiling down to one vital objective: a well- implemented plot to prevent the inauguration. To this end every scheme focused on eliminating Abraham Lincoln, and Baltimore was generally conceded to be the logical INTRODUCTION XU1 site for the trap to be sprung. There were many versions as to how the deed would be done. One "reliable source" had it that the President-elect would be shot with an air gun while driving through the streets, another insisted that a revolver was to be used, less hardy souls recommended a train derailment, or abduction to a boat waiting in the harbor for a quick get-away to the South—but blood- thirsty Baltimorians demanded immediate dispatch with the bowie knife. Up to the time of his departure from Springfield, Lincoln had considered a possible failure of the official count of the electoral vote, or perhaps an unfriendly demonstration at the inauguration, to be his only serious hazards in taking office. He refused to be alarmed by anonymous threats of personal violence, knowing that General Scott had been making adequate preparations in Washington, and that two committees of Congress were holding investigations for the purpose of exploding rumors, publicizing facts, and quieting needless apprehension. But as his journey drew to a close, public feeling in Baltimore was reported as having become increasingly tense, the attitude of the press decidedly hostile, and the warnings more and more ominous. At length it became quite evident that the hospitality of the city was not to be extended to the presidential party. This omission of an official welcome, with the usual speeches, receptions, fanfare, and parade, was highly signifi- cant. It was a. discourtesy made all the more conspicuous by the fact that Mr. Lincoln was scheduled to arrive at mid- day and drive all the way across town from one railway terminal to another. But it appeared that the slight would have to be borne, since it was then too late to arrange a necessarily elaborate detour. In effect there appeared to be XIV INTRODUCTION no other way to get the President-elect to his seat of government. But there was an alternative—a simple alterna- tive—and when urgent last-minute warnings of imminent danger reached the party at Philadelphia, Lincoln was persuaded to adopt it. Abandoning his published itinerary, he decided to pass through Baltimore secretly in a sleeping car on the midnight train. This could be done easily and without causing atten- tion, as it was customary at that late hour to uncouple the cars and draw them slowly by horses through the quiet, deserted streets. The maneuver worked, but it caused a furor. Many wagers were lost and won; Wall Street rallied; commis- sioners of the Peace Conference, sitting in solemn conclave in Washington, were jolted when the news came through, and the Missouri member was so dumfounded that he blurted out, "How the devil did he get through Baltimore?"1 The cartoonists had a Roman holiday, and the comedy- relief provided by their response created a welcome diver- sion. Gentlemen of the press also made the most of the rare opportunity, and a bright reporter in Boston had an idea "that the ridiculous telegrams about assassination, etc., may not unreasonably be accounted for by supposing that some- thing startling was necessary in order to divert the public mind from Mr. Lincoln's crude speeches."2 As to Lincoln's own reaction, biographers differ. Some have claimed that he regretted the incident, and felt morti- fied and chagrined. Elihu B. Washbume, who met him at the depot, had this to say: "I was the first man to see him after his arrival in Washington . and I know he was neither 'mortified' nor 'chagrined'. He expressed to me in the warmest terms his satisfaction at the complete success INTRODUCTION XV of his journey . ."s Colonel Lamon, in another version, quoted Lincoln as having said: "You . know that the way we skulked into this city [Washington] . has been a source of shame and regret to me, for it did look so cowardly!"4 His longest statement on the subject was made to Benson J. Lossing in 1864, who gave it substantially in the President's own words, as follows: I arrived at Philadelphia on the 21st. I agreed to stop over night, and on the following morning hoist the flag5 over Independence Hall. In the evening there was a great crowd where I received my friends, at the Continental Hotel. Mr. Judd, a warm personal friend from Chicago, sent for me to come to his room.
Recommended publications
  • Lincoln As a Bar Examiner by Robert A
    Lincoln As A Bar Examiner by Robert A. Sprecher* Illinois State Bar Association Illinois Bar Journal 42:918 August 1954 Among the some five thousand volumes delving into every conceivable aspect of the life of Abraham Lincoln may be found a few scattered references to his work as a bar examiner, but these instances do not appear to be collected in any work. In view of the limited number of lawyers in Illinois at the time and particularly the number intending to practice in the general vicinity of Springfield, Lincoln's activities as an examiner seem to be substantial. In 1897, the Supreme Court of Illinois instituted a permanent, central Board of Law Examiners financed out of applicants' fees and at the same time introduced the requirement of a written bar examination. Prior to that time, from statehood in 1818 until approximately 1850, oral bar examinations were conducted by one or more judges of the Supreme Court. In the interim period of 1850 to 1897, oral examinations were conducted in a variety of ways, including by committees appointed by circuit court judges during 1850-1858 and by examining boards appointed by the Supreme Court during 1858-1865. The circuit court judges appointed special committees consisting of two or three practicing attorneys as the need arose, while the Supreme Court appointed regular boards with three members each to examine all applicants appearing within a particular division of the state.1 Lincoln's activity as an examiner took place both as a circuit court appointee and as a Supreme Court appointee. The examiners would customarily hold a brief interview with the applicant and then hand him a written certificate recommending that a license be issued.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln the Lawyer1
    Remembering Lincoln The Lawyer1 By Kelly Andersen As a child I was taught to respect and admire our 16th president, yet I really did not comprehend why he was considered so great a man. I suspected it had something to do with the Gettysburg Address, or in general that he had been president during the Civil War, yet beyond that vague feeling I really knew very little about him. Not long ago, while visiting a bookstore, I noticed a one-volume edition of Carl Sandburg’s monumental six-volume epic biography of Lincoln,2 and decided that while I could not afford the time to read six volumes, I most certainly could read one. Besides, I reasoned, Sandburg was unquestionably an excellent writer and deserved to be read, even if the study of Lincoln was inconsequential. I was not disappointed in the book. It not only inspired a great respect for Lincoln, but bathed me with desire to know more and more about this most admired of all U.S. presidents. I soon returned to the bookstore and bought Lincoln biographies written by William H. Herndon3 (Lincoln’s law partner for more than 16 years), by Ward Hill Lamon4 (Lincoln’s law associate in Danville, Ill., where Lincoln traveled on the Illinois 8th Circuit) and by Isaac N. Arnold5 (an attorney who practiced before the same bar as Lincoln and who served in Congress during Lincoln’s administration). After reading these well written biographies, I also read—for good measure— comprehensive biographies by Stephen B. Oates6 and David Herbert Donald.7 These—written more recently—drew upon hundreds of sources not available to biographers who lived during Lincoln’s lifetime, and not even available to Sandburg.
    [Show full text]
  • The True Mary Todd Lincoln ALSO by BETTY BOLES ELLISON
    The True Mary Todd Lincoln ALSO BY BETTY BOLES ELLISON The Early Laps of Stock Car Racing: A History of the Sport and Business through 1974 (McFarland, 2014) The True Mary Todd Lincoln A Biography BETTY BOLES ELLISON McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers Jefferson, North Carolina LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGUING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA Ellison, Betty Boles. The true Mary Todd Lincoln : a biography / Betty Boles Ellison. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-7864-7836-1 (softcover : acid free paper) ♾ ISBN 978-1-4766-1517-2 (ebook) 1. Lincoln, Mary Todd, 1818–1882. 2. Presidents’ spouses—United States— Biography. 3. Lincoln, Abraham, 1809–1865—Family. I. Title. E457.25.L55E45 2014 973.7092—dc23 [B] 2014003651 BRITISH LIBRARY CATALOGUING DATA ARE AVAILABLE © 2014 Betty Boles Ellison. All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying or recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. On the cover: Oil portrait of a twenty-year-old Mary Todd painted in 1928 by Katherine Helm, a niece of Mary Todd Lincoln and daughter of Confederate General Ben H. Helm. It is based on a daguerreotype taken in Springfield by N.H. Shepherd in 1846; a companion daguerreotype is the earliest known photograph of Lincoln (courtesy of the Abraham Lincoln Library and Museum of Lincoln Memorial University, Harrogate, Tennessee) Manufactured in the United States of America McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers Box 611, Jefferson, North Carolina 28640 www.mcfarlandpub.com For Sofia E.
    [Show full text]
  • WAD Oct 2006-Rev #2.Indd
    WORLD ASSOCIATION OF DETECTIVES W.A.D. NEWS Vol. 57, Issue 3 www.wad.net October 2006 Linda Walker (Dru Sjodin’s mother) and Investigator Bob Heales searching for Dru in Winter 2003 PHOTO CREDIT: CHRIS REGIMBAL OF WDAZ TV IN GRAND FORKS, NORTH DAKOTA Inside this issue: Selecting the Right Investigator UK Robber Caught by DNA Gets 15 Years Tokyo Conference Highlights 2 WORLD ASSOCIATION OF DETECTIVES, INC. W.A.D. BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2006-2007 PAST PRESIDENTS with voting rights J D Vinson, Jr. Chairman of the Board Raymond A. Pendleton – New Orleans, Louisiana, USA Richard D. Jacques-Turner – Hull, England 955 Howard Avenue Robert A. Heales – Denver, Colorado, USA New Orleans, Louisiana Philip J. Stuto – Concord, California, USA 70113 USA Joel Michel – Burlingame, California, USA Rockne F. Cooke – Baltimore, Maryland, USA Tel: +1-504-529-2260 Werner E. Sachse – Aschaffenburg, Germany [email protected] Louis Laframboise – Laval, Quebec, Canada Jan Stekelenburg – Bavel, Netherlands John G. Talaganis – Long Beach, California, USA JD Vinson, Jr. – New Orleans, Louisiana, USA Eric Shelmerdine Term Ending 2007 Term Ending 2008 President Manuel Graf Simon Jacobs David Grimes Maureen Jacques-Turner 295-297 Church Street Gerd Hoffmann, Jr. Kimberly King Blackpool, FY1 3PJ Lothar Mueller Siti Naidu England Laura Rossi Jean Schmitt Christine Vinson Vladimir Solomanidin Tel: +44-1253-295265 Matthias Willenbrink Candice Tal [email protected] Term Ending 2009 R.P. Chauhan Jim Foster Sumio Hiroshima Lothar Kimm Allen Cardoza Fernando Molina Dato Mohamad Som Sulaiman 1st Vice President Dale Wunderlich 3857 Birch Street, Suite 208 Newport Beach, California 92660-2616 USA Parliamentarian Historian Sergeant at Arms Tel: +1-877-899-8585 Rockne F.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Historical Magazine, 1950, Volume 45, Issue No. 1
    MARYLAND HISTORICAL MAGAZINE -. % * ,#^iPB P^jJl ?3 ^I^PQPQI H^^yjUl^^ ^_Z ^_^^.: •.. : ^ t lj^^|j|| tm *• Perry Hall, Baltimore County, Home of Harry Dorsey Gough Central Part Built 1773, Wings Added 1784 MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY BALTIMORE larch - 1950 Jft •X'-Jr t^r Jfr Jr J* A* JU J* Jj* Jl» J* Jt* ^tuiy <j» J» Jf A ^ J^ ^ A ^ A •jr J» J* *U J^ ^t* J*-JU'^ Jfr J^ J* »jnjr «jr Jujr «V Jp J(r Jfr Jr Jfr J* «jr»t JUST PUBLISHED BY THE SOCIETY HISTORY OF QUEEN ANNE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND By FREDERIC EMORY First printed in 1886-87 in the columns of the Centre- ville Observer, this authoritative history of one of the oldest counties on the Eastern Shore, has now been issued in book form. It has been carefully indexed and edited. 629 pages. Cloth binding. $7.50 per copy. By mail $7.75. Published with the assistance of the Queen Anne's County Free Library by the MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY 201 W. MONUMENT STREET BALTIMORE 1 •*••*••*•+•(•'t'+'t-T',trTTrTTTr"r'PTTTTTTTTTTrrT,f'»-,f*"r-f'J-TTT-ft-4"t"t"t"t--t-l- CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING Dftrkxr-BTKrTVTMn FRANK W. LINNEMANN BOOKBINDING 2^ Park Ave Magazines, medical books. Old books rebound PHOTOGRAPHY THE "^^^^ 213 West Monument Street, Baltimore nvr^m^xm > m» • ^•» -, _., ..-•-... „ Baltimore Photo & Blue Print Co PHOTOSTATS & BLUEPRINTS 211 East Baltimore St. Photo copying of old records, genealogical charts LE 688I and family papers. Enlargements. Coats of Arms. PLUMBING — HEATING M. NELSON BARNES Established 1909 BE.
    [Show full text]
  • Actor, Assassin, Patriot, Pawn; What You Think You Know About John Wilkes Booth”
    April 14, 2016 The Civil War: April 12, 1861 - May 9, 1865 “Actor, Assassin, Patriot, Pawn; What you think you know about John Wilkes Booth” It was sad news to hear of Don “Duffy” Forsyth’s pass- ing last month. His gentle smile has been missed the last few months. His efforts in getting the speaker for our last luncheon were important to the success of the event. I was pleased to hear from his wife, Nancy, about how much he enjoyed the time he spent with Old Baldy. We are grateful that the family listed Old Baldy as an organization to which a donation could be made to honor Don. Bob Hanrahan, Jr. told us all about the battle between the Kearsarge and the Alabama last month. This month Joanne Hulme, a Booth descendant, will inform us what we do not know about John Wilkes Booth. Next month our vice-president Bob Russo will share his research on Arlington National Cemetery. Be sure to tell others about Joanne Hulme our great programs and activities. Ticket sales for our Iwo Jima print are going well. Pick up a flyer at the meeting to display in your area. Join us at 7:15 PM on Thursday, April 14th, at Camden Planning for our October Symposium is coming along well. County College in the Connector Building, Room 101. At our meeting on the 14th, we will present opportunities This month’s topic is "Actor, Assassin, Patriot, Pawn; for some members to assist on the project. Some tasks we What you think you know about John Wilkes Booth" have identified so far include contacting local businesses presented by Joanne Hulme.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln on Battlefield of Antietam, Maryland, Alexander Gardner
    J. Paul Getty Museum Education Department Exploring Photographs Information and Questions for Teaching Lincoln on Battlefield of Antietam, Maryland, Alexander Gardner Lincoln on Battlefield of Antietam, Maryland Alexander Gardner American, Maryland, October 2, 1862 Albumen print 8 5/8 x 7 3/4 in. 84.XM.482.1 Twenty-six thousand soldiers were killed or wounded in the Battle of Antietam on September 17, 1862, after which Confederate General Robert E. Lee was forced to retreat to Virginia. Just two weeks after the victory, President and Commander- in-Chief Abraham Lincoln conferred with General McClernand (at the right) and Allan Pinkerton, Chief of the nascent Secret Service (on the left), who had organized espionage missions behind Confederate lines. Lincoln stands tall, front and center in his stovepipe hat, his erect and commanding posture emphasized by the tent pole that seems to be an extension of his spine. The other men stand slightly apart in deference to their leader. Both McClernand and Pinkerton have a hand tucked inside their coats, a conventional pose in portraiture. The reclining figure of the man at left in the background and the shirt hanging from the tree are a reminder that, although this is a formally posed picture, Lincoln's presence did not halt the camp's activity, and no attempts were made to isolate him from the ordinary circumstances surrounding the continuing military conflict. About the Artist Alexander Gardner (American, 1821–1882) As an idealistic young reporter and newspaper editor in Glasgow, Scotland, Alexander Gardner dreamed of forming a semi-socialistic colony somewhere in what he thought of as the unspoiled wilderness of America.
    [Show full text]
  • Historically Speaking
    Historically Speaking Abraham Lincoln, Commander in Chief, at 200 ebruary 12th marks the 200th birth- By Brig. Gen. John S. Brown most of his generals, he recognized that Fday of Abraham Lincoln. Our revered U.S. Army retired this effort required total war. Southern 16th President assumed office amid cata- leaders, with considerable justification, strophic civil strife, preserved the Union and died a martyr believed further participation in the Union imperiled a so- to this cause. In four years, Lincoln—more so than any sin- cial and economic order they cherished. Their decision to gle historical figure—defined Americans’ conception of secede was irreversible. Lincoln wisely let them strike the their Commander in Chief. first obvious blow—at Fort Sumter, S.C., in April 1861—be- Today we expect our presidents to establish the political fore mobilizing the outraged nation that remained. Mean- and moral legitimacy of force when we choose to use it, to while, he had been urgently negotiating within the border- communicate a grand strategic vision and to assert them- line slave states of Delaware, Maryland, Missouri and selves in significant military decisions without displacing Kentucky to keep them in the Union. the professionals who must work out the details and carry When war broke out, Lincoln suspended habeas corpus them out. Military inexperience provides reason to seek and summarily swept 18,000 secessionists within those wise counsel but does not diminish the Commander in states into captivity, tipping a political balance that kept Chief’s responsibility to fulfill these functions. Lincoln’s them in the Union.
    [Show full text]
  • SOCKKIDS™ Meet Lincoln Cip to Come the SOCKKIDS™ Meet Lincoln
    The SOCKKIDS™ Meet Lincoln cip to come The SOCKKIDS™ Meet Lincoln by Michael John Sullivan and Susan Petrone he sock drawer shook from side to side, which could only mean one thing: the Sockkids were Tdancing! It was Saturday in their human’s house. What’s so special about Saturday? Why, it’s wash day! What sock doesn’t like to take a swim in the washing machine? “Whew, it sure is smelly in here,” said Grandpa Bleach. “These kids may need the extra wash cycle.” “I need a long wash,” said Stretch, a tube sock who spent most of his time with the humans playing sports. His little sister, Rinse, took a sniff in his direction. “Yuck!” she said. Rinse was very happy. She loved swimming in the washer. She adjusted her goggles and pretended to be a dolphin swimming up and down in the water. “Yay!” she squealed. “Don’t get fuzzies!” Rainbow said to her husband Parch, who loved to lounge in the dryer all day. “That includes you, too, Grandpa. No dozing.” The Sockkids laughed. Grandpa would often fall asleep in the dryer and wake up covered with fuzzies. Yes, fuzzies! Fuzzies were those little knots that clung to their bodies. Then the humans would have to pull them off. The pinging pain sent even the most courageous sock to the nearest laundry basket for another wash. Oh, it was terrible to even say the word “fuzzies!” One of the humans scooped up the entire Socker family and headed for the laundry room, where the water was already pouring into the washer.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Civil Rights in the United States: a Bibliography of Resources in the Erwin Library, Wayne Community College
    History of Civil Rights in the United States: A Bibliography of Resources in the Erwin Library, Wayne Community College The History of civil rights in the United States is not limited in any way to the struggle to first abolish slavery and then the iniquitous “Jim Crow” laws which became a second enslavement after the end of the American Civil War in 1865. Yet, since that struggle has been so tragically highlighted with such long turmoil and extremes of violence, it has become, ironically perhaps, the source of the country’s greatest triumph, as well as its greatest shame. The assassination of President Abraham Lincoln, who would have sought to guide the reunion of the warring states with a leniency and clear purpose which could possibly have prevented the bitterness that gave rise to the “Jim Crow” aberrations in the Southern communities, seems to have foreshadowed the renewed turmoil after the assassination in 1968 of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., who had labored so long to awaken the nation non‐violently, but unwaveringly, to its need to reform its laws and attitudes toward the true union of all citizens of the United States, regardless of color. In 2013 the anniversaries are being observed of two eloquent and crucial landmarks in U.S. history, one a document, the other a speech. The Emancipation Proclamation, issued by President Abraham Lincoln in 1863, re‐focusing the flagging Union’s purpose on the abolition of slavery as an outcome of the Civil War, is now one hundred and fifty years old. The “I Have a Dream” speech, delivered by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University the Graduate School College of The
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts CITIES AT WAR: UNION ARMY MOBILIZATION IN THE URBAN NORTHEAST, 1861-1865 A Dissertation in History by Timothy Justin Orr © 2010 Timothy Justin Orr Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2010 The dissertation of Timothy Justin Orr was reviewed and approved* by the following: Carol Reardon Professor of Military History Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Director of Graduate Studies in History Mark E. Neely, Jr. McCabe-Greer Professor in the American Civil War Era Matthew J. Restall Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Colonial Latin American History, Anthropology, and Women‘s Studies Carla J. Mulford Associate Professor of English *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School ii ABSTRACT During the four years of the American Civil War, the twenty-three states that comprised the Union initiated one of the most unprecedented social transformations in U.S. History, mobilizing the Union Army. Strangely, scholars have yet to explore Civil War mobilization in a comprehensive way. Mobilization was a multi-tiered process whereby local communities organized, officered, armed, equipped, and fed soldiers before sending them to the front. It was a four-year progression that required the simultaneous participation of legislative action, military administration, benevolent voluntarism, and industrial productivity to function properly. Perhaps more than any other area of the North, cities most dramatically felt the affects of this transition to war. Generally, scholars have given areas of the urban North low marks. Statistics refute pessimistic conclusions; northern cities appeared to provide a higher percentage than the North as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • General James Shields, Soldier, Orator, Statesman
    Library of Congress General James Shields, soldier, orator, statesman / J W Shields GENERAL JAMES SHIELDS, Soldier, Orator, Statesman .* * Read at the monthly meeting of the Executive Council, April 13, 1914. BY HENRY A. CASTLE James Shields was born in County Tyrone, Ireland, May 12, 1806. Many authorities place this date four years later, but the original family records, now in the hands of St. Paul relatives, confirm much collateral evidence of the correctness of this statement. He was of notable ancestry. In the paternal line it was distinctly Irish and Catholic, but a great- grandmother was English, and his mother was Scottish. For generations the Shields family were people of property, education, and consideration, living at Cranfield, County Antrim, Province of Ulster. At the battle of the Boyne, in 1690, Daniel Shields and four sons fought on the losing side, that of King James II. There the father and one son were killed. Two of the surviving sons went to Spain, where one of them became a general and finally Captain General of Cuba. Daniel, the youngest son, remained in Ireland, but suffered from the confiscations and banishment visited on the Catholic soldiers of the dethroned king by William of Orange, the victor. This Daniel married an English girl, whom he had romantically rescued from drowning, and settled on mountain land at Altmore, County Tyrone. He was the direct ancestor of the future American general and senator. Charles Shields, a grandson of Daniel, married Katherine McDonnell, of Glencoe, Scotland, lineage, a woman of education and refinement. To them were born James, the subject of this memoir, Daniel, and Patrick, who thus inherited an infusion of the Scotch-Irish blood which has been manifest in many General James Shields, soldier, orator, statesman / http://www.loc.gov/resource/lhbum.0866h_0763_0783 Library of Congress distinguished Americans.
    [Show full text]