DOCSLIB.ORG

Evolutionary Ecology of Ribosomal Rna Copy Number: Studies in Soil Prokaryote and Nematode Communities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evolutionary Ecology of Ribosomal Rna Copy Number: Studies in Soil Prokaryote and Nematode Communities EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY OF RIBOSOMAL RNA COPY NUMBER: STUDIES IN SOIL PROKARYOTE AND NEMATODE COMMUNITIES by Mark Reid Williamson Bachelor of Science, University of North Dakota, 2014 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of North Dakota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Grand Forks, North Dakota December 2019 PERMISSION Title Evolutionary Ecology of Ribosomal RNA Copy Number: Studies in Soil Prokaryote and Nematode Communities Department Biology Degree Doctor of Philosophy In presenting this dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a graduate degree from the University of North Dakota, I agree that the library of this University shall make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for extensive copying for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor who supervised my dissertation work or, in her/his absence, by the Chairperson of the department or the Dean of the Graduate School. It is understood that any copying or publication or other use of this dissertation or part thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of North Dakota in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my dissertation. Mark R. Williamson December 5th, 2019 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES………………………………………………………………………………………viii LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .........................................................................................................x ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................... xi CHAPTER I. ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION, AND GENOMICS IN THE SOIL ENVIRONMENT ......................................................................... 1 Soil Health Monitoring ......................................................................................... 1 Ecological Stoichiometry ...................................................................................... 3 Growth Rate Hypothesis ....................................................................................... 5 Genetic Hypotheses for the Growth Rate Hypothesis .......................................... 6 Ribosomal RNA .................................................................................................... 10 Copy Number Variation ........................................................................................ 10 Prokaryotes ........................................................................................................... 12 Nematodes............................................................................................................. 13 Maturity Index ...................................................................................................... 14 Objectives ............................................................................................................. 16 II. PHYLOGENETIC AUTOCORRELATION ........................................................ 22 Abstract ................................................................................................................. 22 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 22 Objectives ............................................................................................................. 24 Methods................................................................................................................. 24 Results ................................................................................................................... 28 Discussion ............................................................................................................. 31 Conclusion ............................................................................................................ 35 III. OAKVILLE PRAIRIE SOIL CORE STUDIES ................................................... 51 Abstract ................................................................................................................. 51 iv Introduction ........................................................................................................... 51 Objectives ............................................................................................................. 55 Methods................................................................................................................. 55 Results ................................................................................................................... 62 Discussion ............................................................................................................. 66 Conclusion ............................................................................................................ 71 IV. KONZA PRAIRIE SOIL STUDIES ..................................................................... 86 Abstract ................................................................................................................. 86 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 86 Objectives ............................................................................................................. 87 Methods................................................................................................................. 87 Results ................................................................................................................... 92 Discussion ............................................................................................................. 94 Conclusion ............................................................................................................ 95 V. NEMATODE LIFE HISTORY TRAITS AND 18S rRNA COPY NUMBER .....................................................................108 Abstract ................................................................................................................108 Introduction ..........................................................................................................109 Objectives ............................................................................................................112 Methods................................................................................................................112 Results ..................................................................................................................118 Discussion ............................................................................................................121 Conclusion ...........................................................................................................124 VI. EPILOGUE ..........................................................................................................140 Summary ..............................................................................................................140 Implications..........................................................................................................142 Future Research ...................................................................................................142 v APPENDIX A: SUPPLEMENTAL METHODS ........................................................................144 Chapter III Supplemental Methods ..................................................................................144 Chapter V Supplemental Methods ...................................................................................146 APPENDIX B: SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURE AND GRAPHS ...................................................157 Chapter III Supplemental Figures and Graphs .................................................................157 Chapter V Supplemental Figures and Graphs ..................................................................163 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................167 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1.1 rRNA Structure across Organisms ................................................................................19 1.2 Tree of Life ...................................................................................................................20 2.1 Major Taxonomic Comparisons ...................................................................................37 2.2 Autocorrelation of 18S Sequence and Copy Number ...................................................38 2.3 Semi-variance of 18S Sequence and Copy Number .....................................................39 2.4 Cumulative Distribution Function ................................................................................40 2.5 Firmicutes Copy Number Tree .....................................................................................41 2.6 Example of Significant Phylogenetic Signal ................................................................42 2.7 Example of Non-significant Phylogenetic Signal .........................................................43 2.8 Silva Archaea Copy Number Tree ................................................................................44 2.9 Ancestral State
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Developing a Genetic Manipulation System for the Antarctic Archaeon, Halorubrum Lacusprofundi: Investigating Acetamidase Gene Function
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Developing a genetic manipulation system for the Antarctic archaeon, Halorubrum lacusprofundi: Received: 27 May 2016 Accepted: 16 September 2016 investigating acetamidase gene Published: 06 October 2016 function Y. Liao1, T. J. Williams1, J. C. Walsh2,3, M. Ji1, A. Poljak4, P. M. G. Curmi2, I. G. Duggin3 & R. Cavicchioli1 No systems have been reported for genetic manipulation of cold-adapted Archaea. Halorubrum lacusprofundi is an important member of Deep Lake, Antarctica (~10% of the population), and is amendable to laboratory cultivation. Here we report the development of a shuttle-vector and targeted gene-knockout system for this species. To investigate the function of acetamidase/formamidase genes, a class of genes not experimentally studied in Archaea, the acetamidase gene, amd3, was disrupted. The wild-type grew on acetamide as a sole source of carbon and nitrogen, but the mutant did not. Acetamidase/formamidase genes were found to form three distinct clades within a broad distribution of Archaea and Bacteria. Genes were present within lineages characterized by aerobic growth in low nutrient environments (e.g. haloarchaea, Starkeya) but absent from lineages containing anaerobes or facultative anaerobes (e.g. methanogens, Epsilonproteobacteria) or parasites of animals and plants (e.g. Chlamydiae). While acetamide is not a well characterized natural substrate, the build-up of plastic pollutants in the environment provides a potential source of introduced acetamide. In view of the extent and pattern of distribution of acetamidase/formamidase sequences within Archaea and Bacteria, we speculate that acetamide from plastics may promote the selection of amd/fmd genes in an increasing number of environmental microorganisms.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Reproductive Efficiency of Entomopathogenic Nematodes As Scavengers. Are They Able to 1 Fight for Insect's Cadavers?
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sapientia 1 Reproductive efficiency of entomopathogenic nematodes as scavengers. Are they able to 2 fight for insect’s cadavers? 3 4 Rubén Blanco-Péreza,b, Francisco Bueno-Palleroa,b, Luis Netob, Raquel Campos-Herreraa,b,* 5 6 a MeditBio, Centre for Mediterranean Bioresources and Food, Universidade do Algarve, Campus 7 de Gambelas, 8005, Faro (Portugal) 8 b Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005, Faro (Portugal) 9 10 *Corresponding author 11 Email: [email protected] 12 1 13 Abstract 14 15 Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) and their bacterial partners are well-studied insect 16 pathogens, and their persistence in soils is one of the key parameters for successful use as 17 biological control agents in agroecosystems. Free-living bacteriophagous nematodes (FLBNs) in 18 the genus Oscheius, often found in soils, can interfere in EPN reproduction when exposed to live 19 insect larvae. Both groups of nematodes can act as facultative scavengers as a survival strategy. 20 Our hypothesis was that EPNs will reproduce in insect cadavers under FLBN presence, but their 21 reproductive capacity will be severely limited when competing with other scavengers for the same 22 niche. We explored the outcome of EPN - Oscheius interaction by using freeze-killed larvae of 23 Galleria mellonella. The differential reproduction ability of two EPN species (Steinernema 24 kraussei and Heterorhabditis megidis), single applied or combined with two FLBNs (Oscheius 25 onirici or Oscheius tipulae), was evaluated under two different infective juvenile (IJ) pressure: 26 low (3 IJs/host) and high (20 IJs/host).
    [Show full text]
  • Table S5. the Information of the Bacteria Annotated in the Soil Community at Species Level
    Table S5. The information of the bacteria annotated in the soil community at species level No. Phylum Class Order Family Genus Species The number of contigs Abundance(%) 1 Firmicutes Bacilli Bacillales Bacillaceae Bacillus Bacillus cereus 1749 5.145782459 2 Bacteroidetes Cytophagia Cytophagales Hymenobacteraceae Hymenobacter Hymenobacter sedentarius 1538 4.52499338 3 Gemmatimonadetes Gemmatimonadetes Gemmatimonadales Gemmatimonadaceae Gemmatirosa Gemmatirosa kalamazoonesis 1020 3.000970902 4 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas indica 797 2.344876284 5 Firmicutes Bacilli Lactobacillales Streptococcaceae Lactococcus Lactococcus piscium 542 1.594633558 6 Actinobacteria Thermoleophilia Solirubrobacterales Conexibacteraceae Conexibacter Conexibacter woesei 471 1.385742446 7 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas taxi 430 1.265115184 8 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas wittichii 388 1.141545794 9 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas sp. FARSPH 298 0.876754244 10 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sorangium cellulosum 260 0.764953367 11 Proteobacteria Deltaproteobacteria Myxococcales Polyangiaceae Sorangium Sphingomonas sp. Cra20 260 0.764953367 12 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas panacis 252 0.741416341
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Universal Forward Genetics: Using a Draft Genome Sequence of the Nematode Oscheius Tipulae to Identify Mutations Affecting Vulva Development
    Genetics: Early Online, published on June 19, 2017 as 10.1534/genetics.117.203521 Towards universal forward genetics: using a draft genome sequence of the nematode Oscheius tipulae to identify mutations affecting vulva development 5 Fabrice Besnard*1,2,3, Georgios Koutsovoulos†1,4, Sana Dieudonné*, Mark Blaxter†,5 and Marie-Anne Félix*2,5 10 * Ecole Normale Supérieure, PSL Research University, CNRS, Inserm, Institut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, 75005 Paris, France † Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK 1 Co-first authors. 2 Co-corresponding authors: [email protected], [email protected] 3 Current Address: Laboratoire de Reproduction de développement des plantes, Lyon, France; 15 4 Current Address: INRA, Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS, ISA, France 5 Co-last authors Besnard F., Koutsovoulos G. et al. Oscheius Mapping-by-sequencing 1/48 Copyright 2017. Running title: Oscheius Mapping-by-sequencing Key words : Oscheius tipulae, genome assembly, mapping-by sequencing, vulva development, mig-13 Co-corresponding authors: Fabrice Besnard Address: Laboratoire Reproduction et Développement des Plantes (RDP) 20 Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon (ENS-Lyon) 46, allée d'Italie, 69364 LYON Cedex 07. Tel: +33-4-72-72-86-05 mail: [email protected] Marie-Anne Félix Address: Institute of Biology of the Ecole Normale Supérieure (IBENS) 25 46 rue d'Ulm, 75230 Paris cedex 05, France Tel: +33-1-44-32-39-44 mail: [email protected] Besnard F., Koutsovoulos G. et al. Oscheius Mapping-by-sequencing 2/48 Abstract Mapping-by-sequencing has become a standard method to map and identify phenotype-causing mutations in model species.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Studies Reveal a Close Relative of C. Elegans Thrives in the Fresh Figs
    Woodruf and Phillips BMC Ecol (2018) 18:26 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-018-0182-z BMC Ecology RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Field studies reveal a close relative of C. elegans thrives in the fresh fgs of Ficus septica and disperses on its Ceratosolen pollinating wasps Gavin C. Woodruf1,2* and Patrick C. Phillips2 Abstract Background: Biotic interactions are ubiquitous and require information from ecology, evolutionary biology, and functional genetics in order to be understood. However, study systems that are amenable to investigations across such disparate felds are rare. Figs and fg wasps are a classic system for ecology and evolutionary biology with poor functional genetics; Caenorhabditis elegans is a classic system for functional genetics with poor ecology. In order to help bridge these disciplines, here we describe the natural history of a close relative of C. elegans, Caenorhabditis inopi- nata, that is associated with the fg Ficus septica and its pollinating Ceratosolen wasps. Results: To understand the natural context of fg-associated Caenorhabditis, fresh F. septica fgs from four Okinawan islands were sampled, dissected, and observed under microscopy. C. inopinata was found in all islands where F. septica fgs were found. C.i nopinata was routinely found in the fg interior and almost never observed on the outside surface. C. inopinata was only found in pollinated fgs, and C. inopinata was more likely to be observed in fgs with more foun- dress pollinating wasps. Actively reproducing C. inopinata dominated early phase fgs, whereas late phase fgs with emerging wasp progeny harbored C. inopinata dauer larvae. Additionally, C. inopinata was observed dismounting from Ceratosolen pollinating wasps that were placed on agar plates.
    [Show full text]
  • A White Paper on Nematode Comparative Genomics David Mck
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Journal of Nematology 37(4):408–416. 2005. © The Society of Nematologistsprovided 2005.by UGD Academic Repository A White Paper on Nematode Comparative Genomics David McK. Bird,1 Mark L. Blaxter,2 James P. McCarter,3,4 Makedonka Mitreva,3 Paul W. Sternberg,5 W. Kelley Thomas6 Abstract: In response to the new opportunities for genome sequencing and comparative genomics, the Society of Nematology (SON) formed a committee to develop a white paper in support of the broad scientific needs associated with this phylum and interests of SON members. Although genome sequencing is expensive, the data generated are unique in biological systems in that genomes have the potential to be complete (every base of the genome can be accounted for), accurate (the data are digital and not subject to stochastic variation), and permanent (once obtained, the genome of a species does not need to be experimentally re-sampled). The availability of complete, accurate, and permanent genome sequences from diverse nematode species will underpin future studies into the biology and evolution of this phylum and the ecological associations (particularly parasitic) nematodes have with other organisms. We anticipate that upwards of 100 nematode genomes will be solved to varying levels of completion in the coming decade and suggest biological and practical considerations to guide the selection of the most informative taxa for sequenc- ing. Key words: Caenorhabditis elegans, comparative genomics, genome sequencing, systematics. The “discipline” of genomics arguably began with a on C. elegans, it was clear to the C.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Analyses of the Genus Hymenobacter and Description of Siccationidurans Gen
    etics & E en vo g lu t lo i y o h n a P r f y Journal of Phylogenetics & Sathyanarayana Reddy, J Phylogen Evolution Biol 2013, 1:4 o B l i a o n l r o DOI: 10.4172/2329-9002.1000122 u g o y J Evolutionary Biology ISSN: 2329-9002 Research Article Open Access Phylogenetic Analyses of the Genus Hymenobacter and Description of Siccationidurans gen. nov., and Parahymenobacter gen. nov Gundlapally Sathyanarayana Reddy* CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Uppal Road, Hyderabad-500 007, India Abstract Phylogenetic analyses of 26 species of the genus Hymenobacter based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences, resulted in polyphyletic clustering with three major groups, arbitrarily named as Clade1, Clade2 and Clade3. Delineation of Clade1 and Clade3 from Clade2 was supported by robust clustering and high bootstrap values of more than 90% and 100% in all the phylogenetic methods. 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity shared by Clade1 and Clade2 was 88 to 93%, Clade1 and Clade3 was 88 to 91% and Clade2 and Clade3 was 89 to 92%. Based on robust phylogenetic clustering, less than 93.0% sequence similarity, unique in silico restriction patterns, presence of distinct signature nucleotides and signature motifs in their 16S rRNA gene sequences, two more genera were carved to accommodate species of Clade1 and Clade3. The name Hymenobacter, sensu stricto, was retained to represent 17 species of Clade2. For members of Clade1 and Clade3, the names Siccationidurans gen. nov. and Parahymenobacter gen. nov. were proposed, respectively, and species belonging to Clade1 and Clade3 were transferred to their respective genera.
    [Show full text]
  • Data of Read Analyses for All 20 Fecal Samples of the Egyptian Mongoose
    Supplementary Table S1 – Data of read analyses for all 20 fecal samples of the Egyptian mongoose Number of Good's No-target Chimeric reads ID at ID Total reads Low-quality amplicons Min length Average length Max length Valid reads coverage of amplicons amplicons the species library (%) level 383 2083 33 0 281 1302 1407.0 1442 1769 1722 99.72 466 2373 50 1 212 1310 1409.2 1478 2110 1882 99.53 467 1856 53 3 187 1308 1404.2 1453 1613 1555 99.19 516 2397 36 0 147 1316 1412.2 1476 2214 2161 99.10 460 2657 297 0 246 1302 1416.4 1485 2114 1169 98.77 463 2023 34 0 189 1339 1411.4 1561 1800 1677 99.44 471 2290 41 0 359 1325 1430.1 1490 1890 1833 97.57 502 2565 31 0 227 1315 1411.4 1481 2307 2240 99.31 509 2664 62 0 325 1316 1414.5 1463 2277 2073 99.56 674 2130 34 0 197 1311 1436.3 1463 1899 1095 99.21 396 2246 38 0 106 1332 1407.0 1462 2102 1953 99.05 399 2317 45 1 47 1323 1420.0 1465 2224 2120 98.65 462 2349 47 0 394 1312 1417.5 1478 1908 1794 99.27 501 2246 22 0 253 1328 1442.9 1491 1971 1949 99.04 519 2062 51 0 297 1323 1414.5 1534 1714 1632 99.71 636 2402 35 0 100 1313 1409.7 1478 2267 2206 99.07 388 2454 78 1 78 1326 1406.6 1464 2297 1929 99.26 504 2312 29 0 284 1335 1409.3 1446 1999 1945 99.60 505 2702 45 0 48 1331 1415.2 1475 2609 2497 99.46 508 2380 30 1 210 1329 1436.5 1478 2139 2133 99.02 1 Supplementary Table S2 – PERMANOVA test results of the microbial community of Egyptian mongoose comparison between female and male and between non-adult and adult.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa,Comparison of the Cryptic Nematode Species Caenorhabditis
    Zootaxa 1456: 45–62 (2007) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2007 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Comparison of the cryptic nematode species Caenorhabditis brenneri sp. n. and C. remanei (Nematoda: Rhabditidae) with the stem species pattern of the Caenorhabditis Elegans group WALTER SUDHAUS1 & KARIN KIONTKE2 1Institut für Biologie/Zoologie, AG Evolutionsbiologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise Straße 1-3, 14195 Berlin, Germany. [email protected] 2Department of Biology, New York University, 100 Washington Square E., New York, NY10003, USA. [email protected] Abstract The new gonochoristic member of the Caenorhabditis Elegans group, C. brenneri sp. n., is described. This species is reproductively isolated at the postmating level from its sibling species, C. remanei. Between these species, only minute morphological differences are found, but there are substantial genetic differences. The stem species pattern of the Ele- gans group is reconstructed. C. brenneri sp. n. deviates from this character pattern only in small diagnostic characters. In mating tests of C. brenneri sp. n. females with C. remanei males, fertilization takes place and juveniles occasionally hatch. In the reverse combination, no offspring were observed. Individuals from widely separated populations of each species can be crossed successfully (e.g. C. brenneri sp. n. populations from Guadeloupe and Sumatra, or C. remanei populations from Japan and Germany). Both species have been isolated only from anthropogenic habitats, rich in decom- posing organic material. C. brenneri sp. n. is distributed circumtropically, C. remanei is only found in northern temperate regions. To date, no overlap of the ranges was found.
    [Show full text]
  • Research/Investigación Addition of a New Insect Parasitic Nematode, Oscheius Tipulae, to Iranian Fauna
    RESEARCH/INVESTIGACIÓN ADDITION OF A NEW INSECT PARASITIC NEMATODE, OSCHEIUS TIPULAE, TO IRANIAN FAUNA J. Karimi1*, N. Rezaei1, and E. Shokoohi2 1Biocontrol and Insect Pathology Lab., Department of Plant Protection, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, PO Box 91775-1163, Mashhad, Iran; 2Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, Potchefstroom, North West University, South Africa; *Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Karimi, J., N. Rezaei, and E. Shokoohi. 2018. Addition of a new insect parasitic nematode, Oscheius tipulae, to Iranian fauna. Nematropica 48:00-00. On behalf of an ongoing project on diversity of insect pathogenic and insect parasitic nematodes of Iran, a new species was collected and characterized. This species was collected in soil from the Mashhad, Arak, and Mahalat regions of Iran through 2011-2012 using Galleria larvae baits. Based on morphologic and morphometric traits as well as SEM images, the species tentatively has been identified as Oscheius tipulae. Phylogenetic analysis based on ITS and 18S rDNA genes confirmed the species delimitation. This is the first record of this species from Iran. Key words: 18S rDNA, insect parasitic nematode, Iran, ITS, Oscheius tipulae, SEM RESUMEN Karimi, J., N. Rezaei, y E. Shokoohi. 2018. Adición de un nuevo nematodo parásito de insectos, Oscheius tipulae, a la fauna Irán. Nematropica 48:00-00. En nombre de un proyecto en curso sobre diversidad de patógenos de insectos y nematodos parásitos de insectos de Irán, se recolectó y caracterizó una nueva especie. Esta especie fue recolectada en suelo de las regiones de Mashhad, Arak y Mahalat de Irán durante el período 2011-2012 utilizando cebos Galleria.
    [Show full text]
  • Developmental Plasticity, Ecology, and Evolutionary Radiation of Nematodes of Diplogastridae
    Developmental Plasticity, Ecology, and Evolutionary Radiation of Nematodes of Diplogastridae Dissertation der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) vorgelegt von Vladislav Susoy aus Berezniki, Russland Tübingen 2015 Gedruckt mit Genehmigung der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen. Tag der mündlichen Qualifikation: 5 November 2015 Dekan: Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Rosenstiel 1. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Ralf J. Sommer 2. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Heinz-R. Köhler 3. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Hinrich Schulenburg Acknowledgements I am deeply appreciative of the many people who have supported my work. First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisors, Professor Ralf J. Sommer and Dr. Matthias Herrmann for giving me the opportunity to pursue various research projects as well as for their insightful scientific advice, support, and encouragement. I am also very grateful to Matthias for introducing me to nematology and for doing an excellent job of organizing fieldwork in Germany, Arizona and on La Réunion. I would like to thank the members of my examination committee: Professor Heinz-R. Köhler and Professor Hinrich Schulenburg for evaluating this dissertation and Dr. Felicity Jones, Professor Karl Forchhammer, and Professor Rolf Reuter for being my examiners. I consider myself fortunate for having had Dr. Erik J. Ragsdale as a colleague for several years, and more than that to count him as a friend. We have had exciting collaborations and great discussions and I would like to thank you, Erik, for your attention, inspiration, and thoughtful feedback. I also want to thank Erik and Orlando de Lange for reading over drafts of this dissertation and spelling out some nuances of English writing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genera Staphylococcus and Macrococcus
    Prokaryotes (2006) 4:5–75 DOI: 10.1007/0-387-30744-3_1 CHAPTER 1.2.1 ehT areneG succocolyhpatS dna succocorcMa The Genera Staphylococcus and Macrococcus FRIEDRICH GÖTZ, TAMMY BANNERMAN AND KARL-HEINZ SCHLEIFER Introduction zolidone (Baker, 1984). Comparative immu- nochemical studies of catalases (Schleifer, 1986), The name Staphylococcus (staphyle, bunch of DNA-DNA hybridization studies, DNA-rRNA grapes) was introduced by Ogston (1883) for the hybridization studies (Schleifer et al., 1979; Kilp- group micrococci causing inflammation and per et al., 1980), and comparative oligonucle- suppuration. He was the first to differentiate otide cataloguing of 16S rRNA (Ludwig et al., two kinds of pyogenic cocci: one arranged in 1981) clearly demonstrated the epigenetic and groups or masses was called “Staphylococcus” genetic difference of staphylococci and micro- and another arranged in chains was named cocci. Members of the genus Staphylococcus “Billroth’s Streptococcus.” A formal description form a coherent and well-defined group of of the genus Staphylococcus was provided by related species that is widely divergent from Rosenbach (1884). He divided the genus into the those of the genus Micrococcus. Until the early two species Staphylococcus aureus and S. albus. 1970s, the genus Staphylococcus consisted of Zopf (1885) placed the mass-forming staphylo- three species: the coagulase-positive species S. cocci and tetrad-forming micrococci in the genus aureus and the coagulase-negative species S. epi- Micrococcus. In 1886, the genus Staphylococcus dermidis and S. saprophyticus, but a deeper look was separated from Micrococcus by Flügge into the chemotaxonomic and genotypic proper- (1886). He differentiated the two genera mainly ties of staphylococci led to the description of on the basis of their action on gelatin and on many new staphylococcal species.
    [Show full text]