DOCSLIB.ORG

Naval Postgraduate School Commencement Ceremony / Class of September 2004

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Naval Postgraduate School Commencement Ceremony / Class of September 2004 Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Institutional Publications Commencement Ceremony programs 2004-09 Naval Postgraduate School Commencement Ceremony / Class of September 2004 Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.) Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/39354 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION The Naval Postgraduate School Superintendent The Naval Postgraduate School provides relevant and unique advanced REAR ADMIRAL PATRICK W. DUNNE, USN education and research programs in order to increase the co111bat effective­ ness of United States and allied forces and enhance the security of the United States. 0 Provost DR. RICHARD S. ELSTER The Naval Postgraduate School was opened in Annapolis in 1909 and later transferred to the Monterey Peninsula in 1952. Since its beginning, the school has conferred over 43,000 degrees. Dean of School of International Graduate Studies LTG ROBERT ORD Ill, USA (Ret) Enrollment at the Naval Postgraduate School has grown to nearly 1,500 resident students. Nearly 50 percent are from the United States Navy or Marine Corps, 25 percent are from other United States armed services, and Dean of Graduate School of the remaining 25 percent are from allied countries. Officers are obliged to Operational and Information Sciences remain in service for about three years after they complete their schooling. PROF WAYNE HUGHES Students are engaged in intensive studies leading to a master's degree in Dean of Graduate School of Engineering one of 42 different curricula split between the School of International and Applied Science Graduate Studies, and the Graduate Schools of Operational and Informa­ DR. JAMES KAYS tion Sciences, Engineering and Applied Science, and the School of Busi­ ness and Public Policy. Each curriculum is tailored to provide the academic requirements for accredited advanced degrees and meet the addi­ tional educational skill requirements necessary for subsequent assign­ Dean of Graduate School of Business and Public Policy ments. DR. DOUGLAS A. BROOK The Naval Postgraduate School has long been a testing ground for the Navy's most advanced research. The Naval Postgraduate School develops Associate Provost/Dean of Research cutting edge technologies for numeric meteorological predictive sciences, DR. LEONARD A. FERRARI oceanographic vehicles, and ultra-high complexity computer model simu­ lations for Department of Defense use. Over 60 million dollars of research is conducted or administered annually at the school. Dean of Students CAPT C. J. HERRON, USN The Naval Postgraduate School is accredited by the Western Association of Schools & Colleges, the Accreditation Board for Engineering & Tech­ 0 nology, the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business and the Director of Programs National Association of Schools of Public Affairs & Administration. CAPT PAULA JORDANEK, USN Rear Admiral Patrick W. Dunne Superintendent Naval Postgraduate School Rear Admiral Dunne graduated from the Naval Academy in 1972 with a Bachelor of Science degree in Mathematics. He has a Master of Science degree in Mathematics from the Naval Postgraduate School and is a graduate of the Navy's Nuclear Power · training. Rear Adm. Dunne's service at sea includes tours on USS Nathanael Greene (SSBN 636) (Blue), operating out of Holy Loch, Scotland; USS Batfish (SSN 681) homeported in Charleston, S.C.; and USS Baton Rouge (SSN 689), homeported in Norfolk, Va. He commanded USS Baltimore (SSN 704) in Norfolk, and USS Frank Cable (AS 40) in Charleston. His shore assignments include Material Officer on the staff of Submarine Squadron Eight and Naval Aide to President Reagan. Rear Adm. Dunne was also the Special Assistant to the Chief of Naval Operations for Joint Chiefs of Staff Matters/Navy Planner. During three separate tours in the Navy's Office of Legislative Affairs, he was the Congressional Liaison Officer for Submarine Programs; the Director, Naval Programs; and Deputy Chief of Legislative Affairs . Selected for Flag Rank in 2001, Rear Adm. Dunne's initial flag assignment was U.S. Pacific Command Representative Guam/Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands/Federated States of Micronesia/Republic of Palau and Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Marianas. Rear Adm. Dunne's awards include two Defense Superior Service Medals, four Legions of Merit, two Meritorious Service Medals, five Navy Commendation Medals, two Navy Achievement Medals, a Humanitarian Service Medal and various unit awards. Dr. James G. Roche Secretary of the Air Force Dr. James G. Roche is the 20th Secretary of the Air Force. In this role, he is responsible for the affairs of the Department of the Air Force, including the organizing, training, equipping, and providing for the welfare of its nearly 370,000 men and women on active duty, 180,000 members of the Air National Guard and the Air Force Reserve, 160,000 civilians, and their families. As head of the Department of the Air Force, Secretary Roche is responsible for its functioning and efficiency, the (' formulation of its policies and programs, and the timely implementation of decisions and instructions of the President of the United States and the Secretary of Defense. With an annual budget of approximately $90 billion, he ensures the Air Force can meet its current and future operational requirements to this appointment, Secretary Roche held several executive positions with Northrop Grumman Corp., including Corporate Vice President and President, Electronic Sensors and Systems Sector. Prior to joining Northrop Grumman in 1984, he was Democratic Staff Director of the U:S. Senate Armed Services Committee. Secretary Roche's previous military service spanned 23 years in the U.S. Navy, retiring with the rank of captain in 1983. As a naval officer, his assignments included Principal Deputy Director of the State Department's Policy Planning Staff; Senior Professional Staff Member of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence; and Assistant Director for the Defense Department's Office of Net Assessment. He commanded the USS Buchanan, a guided missile destroyer, and was awarded the Arleigh Burke Fleet Trophy for the Navy's most improved combat unit in the Pacific in 1974. Secretary Roche has served as a member of the Secretary of Defense's Policy Board and is a member of the Council of Foreign Relations and the International Institute of Strategic Studies. Dr. Roche has been awarded various campaign ribbons and military medals. DR. RICHARD S. ELSTER Provost Naval Postgraduate School Richard Elster was born on 3 December 1939. He attended the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis where he received the degrees of Bachelor of Arts, Master of Arts, and Doctor of Philosophy in Industrial Organizational Psychology. In January of 1969, he joined the faculty of the Naval Postgraduate School. His C teaching focused on DoD manpower, personnel and training policies. From 1 July 1975 to 1 July 1978, he was on leave from the Naval Postgraduate School. During that period, he worked in the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Manpower and Reserve Affairs), and as Senior Scientific Advisor to the Deputy Chief of Naval Operations (Manpower)/Chief of Naval Personnel, Admiral James D. Watkins. On 1 October 1979, he was promoted to Professor in the Department of Administrative Sciences at the Naval Postgraduate School. In July of 1983, he became Chairman of the Department of Administrative Sciences. During the period of 1984-1988, he served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Manpower. Additionally, he was Acting Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Manpower & Reserve Affairs) during the period 7 April - 28 June 1988. In 1989, he filled the Chief of Naval Operation's manpower chair at the Naval Postgraduate School. During January-September 1990, he was Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Resource Management and Support. He was named Dean of Instruction at the Naval Postgraduate School in September 1990, where he served in this role until June 1995. On July 1, 1995 he was named Provost/Academic Dean of the Naval Postgraduate School by the Secretary of the Na\iy. He was appointed to a second five-year term in July of 2000. PLATFORM PARTY SCHEDULE OF EVENTS Processional ................................................................................. Del Monte Brass FIRST ROW (Left to Right) Dr. Jim Eagle Department of Operations Research Grand Marshall ........................................................... Professor Alfred W. Cooper Commander Ronald Kawczyskl, USN Catholic Chaplain Marshall ......................................................... Associate Professor Sherif Michael Naval Postgraduate School SECOND ROW (Left to Right) Marshall ................................................... Associate Professor Greg Rasmussen Colonel Mlchael Simone Dr. James Wirtz USA Department of National Security Affairs Marshall .............................................................. Lieutenant Colonel Greg Misllck Commandant Defense Language Institute Dr. Clarke Robertson Foreign Language Center Department of Electrical and Computer *Presentation of Colors ....................... Naval Postgraduate School Color Guard Engineering Brigadier General Thomas L. Conant *National Anthem .............................................................................. Mr. Eric Clark Commanding General Dr. Phillip A. Durkee Training Command (C47) Department of Meteorology *Invocation ....................................................... Commander Ronald L. Kawczyski 3300 Russell Road
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kuwait, 13 – 16 February 2017) (Presented by MIDRMA
    MIDANPIRG/16-WP/8 15/01/2017 International Civil Aviation Organization Middle East Air Navigation Planning and Implementation Regional Group Sixteenth Meeting (MIDANPIRG/16) (Kuwait, 13 – 16 February 2017) Agenda Item 4.2: Air Navigation Safety related issues MID RVSM SMR 2015 (Presented by MIDRMA) SUMMARY This paper reflects the technical results of the MID RVSM Safety Monitoring Report for 2015 (SMR2015). Action by the meeting is at paragraph 3. REFERENCES - ANSIG/2 Report - MIDANPIRG/15 Report - MIDRMA Board/14 Report - MID RVSM SMR 2014 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Middle East Regional Monitoring Agency presents the MID RVSM Safety Monitoring Report (SMR) to the Middle East Air Navigation Planning and Implementation Regional Group (MIDANPIRG) for endorsement. 1.2 The MID SMR 2015 (Ver. 1.0) was calculated for 12 FIRs in the ICAO Middle East Region. Tripoli and Sanaa FIRs were excluded from the RVSM safety analysis due to the non-submission of the required traffic data and LHD reports for more than two years. 1.3 The results present evidence that the key safety objectives, as set out in the MID RVSM safety policy in accordance with ICAO Doc 9574 (2nd Edition), continue to be met in the Middle East RVSM airspace except for the FIRs mentioned in 1.2. 2. DISCUSSION 2.1 Further to the outcome of MIDANPIRG/15 meeting Conclusion 15/8 concerning the development of the MID RVSM SMR 2015, the Traffic Data Sample (TDS) required for the safety analysis must be collected from 01 September 2015 until 30th September 2015 for all traffic operating within the ICAO Middle East RVSM airspace and must be submitted to the MIDRMA not later than 31 October 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • World Air Forces Flight 2011/2012 International
    SPECIAL REPORT WORLD AIR FORCES FLIGHT 2011/2012 INTERNATIONAL IN ASSOCIATION WITH Secure your availability. Rely on our performance. Aircraft availability on the flight line is more than ever essential for the Air Force mission fulfilment. Cooperating with the right industrial partner is of strategic importance and key to improving Air Force logistics and supply chain management. RUAG provides you with new options to resource your mission. More than 40 years of flight line management make us the experienced and capable partner we are – a partner you can rely on. RUAG Aviation Military Aviation · Seetalstrasse 175 · P.O. Box 301 · 6032 Emmen · Switzerland Legal domicile: RUAG Switzerland Ltd · Seetalstrasse 175 · P.O. Box 301 · 6032 Emmen Tel. +41 41 268 41 11 · Fax +41 41 260 25 88 · [email protected] · www.ruag.com WORLD AIR FORCES 2011/2012 CONTENT ANALYSIS 4 Worldwide active fleet per region 5 Worldwide active fleet share per country 6 Worldwide top 10 active aircraft types 8 WORLD AIR FORCES World Air Forces directory 9 TO FIND OUT MORE ABOUT FLIGHTGLOBAL INSIGHT AND REPORT SPONSORSHIP OPPORTUNITIES, CONTACT: Flightglobal Insight Quadrant House, The Quadrant Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5AS, UK Tel: + 44 208 652 8724 Email:LQVLJKW#ÁLJKWJOREDOFRP Website: ZZZÁLJKWJOREDOFRPLQVLJKt World Air Forces 2011/2012 | Flightglobal Insight | 3 WORLD AIR FORCES 2011/2012 The French and Qatari air forces deployed Mirage 2000-5s for the fight over Libya JOINT RESPONSE Air arms around the world reacted to multiple challenges during 2011, despite fleet and budget cuts. We list the current inventories and procurement plans of 160 nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Rosoboronexport at 20, Focusing Middle East & North African Region
    www.arabiandefence.com | November - December 2020 Defence, Aerospace, Homeland Security News Rosoboronexport at 20, Middle East Supplement Focusing Middle East & North African Region Al Tariq gives Thrust on Innovation, Export Market Theunis Botha CEO, Al Tariq Supported by Held under the prestigious patronage of His Majesty King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa supported by the Royal Bahraini Air Force and Air Defense and Ministry of Transportation and Telecommunications Ocial Conference of Register Now! Get Early Bird Discount until November 1, 2020 Virtual Event 3rd MANAMA Platinum Sponsor SYMPOSIUM NOVEMBER 17, 2020 Conrmed Speakers Organized by Major General Hamad bin Lieutenant General Air Vice Marshal L S Brigadier General Luigi Gary North, Vice President Abdullah Al Khalifah Gregory Guillot TAYLOR OBE Casali, Chief of Sta, for Customer Requirements, For more information and latest updates: Commander, AFCENT Commander, Chief of Sta Capability, Education and Training Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Royal Bahraini Air Force United States Air Command, Royal Air Force Command, Italian Air Force Company www.segma.co/maps2020 Register to attend the one-of-a-kind international event on air power that will see senior officers from air forces from 30 countries discuss and debate topics related to tactics, strategy and technology. As a virtual event, MAPS 2020 will provide an excellent opportunity for air force officers, professional and defense industry executives to participate and engage from the comfort of their offices or homes. It will also place defense companies in a strong position to reach out and promote their latest technologies. Media Partners : Sponsorship Opportunities MAPS 2020 offers a range of sponsorship opportunities for companies to position themselves before key international customers and making a high-impact with decision-makers.2 For further information on sponsorship packages contact Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • DEFENSE Fire Protection
    TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 04-1201 ________________________________________________________________________ DEFENSE Fire Protection Agreement between the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and BAHRAIN Signed at Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina and Shaikh Isa Air Base, Bahrain October 29 and December 1, 2004 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 (80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)— “. .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent evidence . of the treaties, international agreements other than treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the United States, and of the several States, without any further proof or authentication thereof.” BAHRAIN Defense: Fire Protection Agreement signed at Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina and Shaikh Isa Air Base, Bahrain October 29 and December 1, 2004; Entered into force December 1, 2004. AGREEMENT BETWEEN UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, AS REPRESENTED BY THE 9 TH AIR FORCE, AND THE ROYAL BAHRAINI AIR FORCE CONCERNING MUTUAL AID IN FIRE PROTECTION STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA) COUNTY OF SUMTER ) I photocopied the foregoing instrument and certify it to be a true and correct copy of the original, which consists of 3 pages. MARTHA ISINSKI NOTARY AND FOR THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: JANUARY 12, 2014 Copy of 8 • lr . h prp f th Arnt t prvd th Untd Stt Ar r, rprntd b th th Ar r, nd th l hrn Ar r, (hrftr rfrrd t th "rt", th bnft f tl d n fr prttn t Shh I Ar , hrn.
    [Show full text]
  • MIDANPIRG/15 International Civil Aviation Organization Middle East
    MIDANPIRG/15 International Civil Aviation Organization Middle East Air Navigation Planning and Implementation Regional Group Fifteenth Meeting (MIDANPIRG/15) (Bahrain, 8 – 11 June 2015) List of Participants 10 June 2015 NAME TITLE & ADDRESS STATES BAHRAIN Mr. Ali Ahmed Mohammed Director Air Navigation Civil Aviation Affairs KINGDOM OF BAHRAIN Mr. Saleem Mohamed Hassan Chief, Air Traffic Management Civil Aviation Affairs KINGDOM OF BAHRAIN Mr. Ahmed Ali Al-Sayed Head of Air Navigation Projects Civil Aviation Affairs KINGDOM OF BAHRAIN Mr. Salah Mohamed Alhumood Chief of Airports and Air Navigation Audits Civil Aviation Affairs KINGDOM OF BAHRAIN Mr. Abdul Latif Ahmed Bucheeri AND Safety Manager Civil Aviation Affairs KINGDOM OF BAHRAIN Mr. Fareed Ibrahim Bucheeri Head of Search and Rescue Civil Aviation Affairs KINGDOM OF BAHRAIN Mr. Mohamed Ali Saleh Chief Aeronautical Telecommunication Civil Aviation Affairs KINGDOM OF BAHRAIN Mr. Rashed Saleh Al Joben A/Chief Standards, Licensing & Development Civil Aviation Affairs KINGDOM OF BAHRAIN - 2 - NAME TITLE & ADDRESS Mr. Mohammed Hassan Al-Asfoor Chief of Electronics Engineering Civil Aviation Affairs KINGDOM OF BAHRAIN Mr. Abdulla Hasan Al Qadhi A/Chief of Aeronautical Information Management and Airspace Planning Civil Aviation Affairs KINGDOM OF BAHRAIN Mr. Mohammed Yousif Bumtaia Head of Airspace Planning Civil Aviation Affairs KINGDOM OF BAHRAIN Mr. Yaseen Hassan Al Sayed Head Aero Telecomms Networks Civil Aviation Affairs KINGDOM OF BAHRAIN Mr. Salah Mohammed Ismail Acting/Head of ATM Technical Support Civil Aviation Affairs KINGDOM OF BAHRAIN Mr. Fareed Mohammed Alabbasi Tower – Head of Air Traffic Operator Civil Aviation Affairs KINGDOM OF BAHRAIN Mr. Hussain Ali Hamada Electronics Engineer Civil Aviation Affairs KINGDOM OF BAHRAIN Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Navy Carrier Air Group 12 History
    CVG-12 USN Air 1207 October 1945 United States Navy Carrier Air Group 12 (CVG-12) Copy No. 2 History FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY This document is the property of the Government of the United States and is issued for the information of its Forces operating in the Pacific Theatre of Operations. 1 Original (Oct 45) PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com CVG-12 USN Air 1207 October 1945 Intentionally Blank 2 Original (Oct 45) PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com CVG-12 USN Air 1207 October 1945 CONTENTS CONTENTS........................................................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................3 USS Saratoga Embarkation..............................................................................................4 OPERATION SHOESTRING 2 ....................................................................................................4 THE RABAUL RAIDS .....................................................................................................................5 First Strike - 5 November 1943............................................................................................................5 Second Strike - 11 November 1943......................................................................................................7 OPERATION GALVIN....................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • C-130J Super Hercules Program Status and Fast Facts Program Status
    August 2021 C-130J Super Hercules Program Status and Fast Facts Program Status Super Hercules Advantages The C-130J Super Hercules provides significant performance improvements and added operational capabilities that translate directly into increased ground and air combat effectiveness. Some of these attributes include the ability to: • Operate out of 2,000 ft. long dirt strips in high mountain ranges. • Carry tons of supplies more than 3,000 miles and deliver “the last mile” to remote operating bases, keeping trucks off dangerous highways. • Perform in-flight refueling, ground fueling, weather reconnaissance, electronic warfare, medical evacuation, search and rescue, paradrop, maritime mission, special operations and many other missions. • Generate much greater operational efficiencies. The C-130J outperforms older C-130s in combat operations by at least a 2:1 margin. • Operate with only two pilots and one loadmaster for most missions, exposing fewer flight crew members to potential combat threats. • Demonstrate reliability that far exceeds most other military aircraft with average mission capable rates routinely in the 80-to-90% range. One Aircraft, Many Capabilities Electronic Air Drop Intelligence, Humanitarian Combat Aeromedical Aerial Search Commercial Surveillance Surveillance & Delivery Refueling & Rescue Freighter Reconnaissance Communication Aerial Personnel Recovery Weather Gunship Maritime Special Passenger Special Ops Personnel Ground Firefighting Reconnaissance Surveillance Accommodations Transport Refueling Super Hercules
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress
    Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress Updated October 29, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RS22478 Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress Summary Names for Navy ships traditionally have been chosen and announced by the Secretary of the Navy, under the direction of the President and in accordance with rules prescribed by Congress. Rules for giving certain types of names to certain types of Navy ships have evolved over time. There have been exceptions to the Navy’s ship-naming rules, particularly for the purpose of naming a ship for a person when the rule for that type of ship would have called for it to be named for something else. Some observers have perceived a breakdown in, or corruption of, the rules for naming Navy ships. Section 1749 of the FY2020 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) (S. 1790/P.L. 116-92 of December 20, 2019) prohibits the Secretary of Defense, in naming a new ship (or other asset) or renaming an existing ship (or other asset), from giving the asset a name that refers to, or includes a term referring to, the Confederate States of America, including any name referring to a person who served or held leadership within the Confederacy, or a Confederate battlefield victory. The provision also states that “nothing in this section may be construed as requiring a Secretary concerned to initiate a review of previously named assets.” Section 1749 of the House-reported FY2021 NDAA (H.R. 6395) would prohibit the public display of the Confederate battle flag on Department of Defense (DOD) property, including naval vessels.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Chariot
    OPERATION CHARIOT The Greatest Raid of All Seventy years ago, in late March 1942, British military forces conducted Operation Chariot; an audacious amphibious raid on the English Channel port of St. Nazaire in German occupied France. The primary objective of the raid was to disable one of world’s largest dry docks and deny its use to the German Navy. The operation, often referred to as the St. Nazaire Raid met its objective. The dry dock was rendered unusable by the Germans for the remainder of the war. But the British Navy and Commando units involved paid a high cost in the number of personnel killed, wounded or captured. A British destroyer was deliberately destroyed in the operation and a number of smaller escort craft were sunk or badly damaged. In spite of these losses, the raid provided a boost to British military morale. In due time, information about the raid’s success was revealed to a war-weary public that was under constant aerial attack and threat of invasion by German forces. When details of the action were revealed, the British people proudly began to call it ‘The Greatest Raid of All’. Central to the success of Operation Chariot was the destroyer HMS CAMPBELTOWN. She had been built as an American destroyer, the USS BUCHANAN (DD-131). Completed in 1919, the BUCHANAN was too late to participate in World War I. Her namesake was Franklin Buchanan, who had served in the US Navy before the Civil War and in the Confederate Navy during that conflict. His style of conducting naval operations was as audacious and brave as that of the British in 1942.
    [Show full text]
  • C-130J Super Hercules Program Status and Fast Facts Super
    June 2021 C-130J Super Hercules Program Status and Fast Facts Program Status Super Hercules Advantages The C-130J Super Hercules provides significant performance improvements and added operational capabilities that translate directly into increased ground and air combat effectiveness. Some of these attributes include the ability to: • Operate out of 2,000 ft. long dirt strips in high mountain ranges. • Carry tons of supplies more than 3,000 miles and deliver “the last mile” to remote operating bases, keeping trucks off dangerous highways. • Perform in-flight refueling, ground fueling, weather reconnaissance, electronic warfare, medical evacuation, search and rescue, paradrop, maritime mission, special operations and many other missions. • Generate much greater operational efficiencies. The C-130J outperforms older C-130s in combat operations by at least a 2:1 margin. • Operate with only two pilots and one loadmaster for most missions, exposing fewer flight crew members to potential combat threats. • Demonstrate reliability that far exceeds most other military aircraft with average mission capable rates routinely in the 80-to-90% range. One Aircraft, Many Capabilities Electronic Air Drop Intelligence, Humanitarian Combat Aeromedical Aerial Search Commercial Surveillance Surveillance & Delivery Refueling & Rescue Freighter Reconnaissance Communication Aerial Personnel Recovery Weather Gunship Maritime Special Passenger Special Ops Personnel Ground Firefighting Reconnaissance Surveillance Accommodations Transport Refueling Super Hercules
    [Show full text]
  • Sectarian Discrimination and Extremism in Bahrain's Security
    Sectarian Discrimination and Extremism in Bahrain’s Security Forces Questions for US Policy I. Introduction: Is the US Supporting a Sectarian Fighting Force in Bahrain? The United States (US) and Bahrain have a deep and longstanding security partnership, most prominently represented by the American Fifth Fleet base in Manama, the bilateral Defense Cooperation Agreement (DCA) signed in 1991, and former President George W. Bush’s decision to designate the kingdom a major non-NATO ally (MNNA) in 2002.1 Both the Obama and Trump administrations have maintained this relationship to varying degrees, providing approximately $124 million in security aid2 and issuing notifications for more than $4 billion in arms sales since 2009.3 According to the Congressional Research Service, it is currently estimated that roughly 85 percent of Bahrain’s defense material is of US origin.4 Yet, while the US Government typically frames this partnership as necessary for combating terrorism and preserving stability in the region, the Bahraini security establishment consistently contravenes American interests, and is itself a primary driver of sectarian division, extremism, and intercommunal conflict. 1 In November 2017, the Trump administration decided to again extend the DCA with Bahrain. The pact is classified, and details are difficult to ascertain, though it is suspected to contain terms for a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), basing access, joint operations, and training programs, among other items. 2 “Bahrain: Security Aid Pivot Table – Programs,” Security Assistance Monitor, 2017, https://securityassistance.org/data/program/military/Bahrain/2009/2018/all/Global// 3 “Bahrain: Arms Sales Dashboard,” Security Assistance Monitor, 2017, https://securityassistance.org/content/arms-sales-dashboard 4 Kenneth Katzman, Bahrain: Reform, Security, and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the US Navy Into an Effective
    The Evolution of the U.S. Navy into an Effective Night-Fighting Force During the Solomon Islands Campaign, 1942 - 1943 A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Jeff T. Reardon August 2008 © 2008 Jeff T. Reardon All Rights Reserved ii This dissertation titled The Evolution of the U.S. Navy into an Effective Night-Fighting Force During the Solomon Islands Campaign, 1942 - 1943 by JEFF T. REARDON has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by Marvin E. Fletcher Professor of History Benjamin M. Ogles Dean, College of Arts and Sciences iii ABSTRACT REARDON, JEFF T., Ph.D., August 2008, History The Evolution of the U.S. Navy into an Effective Night-Fighting Force During the Solomon Islands Campaign, 1942-1943 (373 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Marvin E. Fletcher On the night of August 8-9, 1942, American naval forces supporting the amphibious landings at Guadalcanal and Tulagi Islands suffered a humiliating defeat in a nighttime clash against the Imperial Japanese Navy. This was, and remains today, the U.S. Navy’s worst defeat at sea. However, unlike America’s ground and air forces, which began inflicting disproportionate losses against their Japanese counterparts at the outset of the Solomon Islands campaign in August 1942, the navy was slow to achieve similar success. The reason the U.S. Navy took so long to achieve proficiency in ship-to-ship combat was due to the fact that it had not adequately prepared itself to fight at night.
    [Show full text]