Socialist Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Socialist Review INTERNATIONAL SOCIALIST REVIEW Vol. 30 No. 1-Whole No. 190 Published bimonthly by the International Socialist Review Publishing Association, 873 Broadway, New York, N. Y., 10003. Second Class postage paid at New York, N. Y. Editor, Tom Kerry Managing Editor, Dick Roberts Associate Editor, George Novack Business Manager, Beverly Scott Contents I n Me mo ry of Rosa Luxe m bu rg by the editors Against Capital Punishment by Rosa Luxe mbu rg 4 life of Korolenko by Rosa Luxemburg (introduction by George Saunders) 7 Fifty Years of Russian literature by George Saunders 32 Can American Workers Make a Socialist Revolution? by George Novack 41 SUBSCRIPTION RATES: 1 year 6 issues 52.50; 2 years 12 issuel 54.75. Add 50 cents per year for Canada, Latin America and overseaSi a single copy 50 cents, bundles 35 cents a copy for five or more domestic or foreign. JANUARY-FEBRUARY 1969 editorial IN MEMORY OF ROSA LUXEMBURG In the closing month of the first world war the soldiers and workers of Germany rose up in a revolution which came close to toppling capitalist rule in that country. Their victory would have brought des­ perately needed aid to the newly formed workers' government of Russia and would have changed the whole course of twentieth-century history. Soldiers got revolutionary propaganda from the Bolsheviks in the opposing trenches and from the Spartacus League in their own ranks. The sailors at the Kiel naval base mutinied to establish a sailors' council to rule that city; soldiers' councils sprang up on the fronts and workers' councils in the major cities. Although it overthrew the monarchy, this mighty upsurge had been driven back into the channels of capitalist politics within months. Its two foremost leaders, Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht, lay murdered in Berlin. The Weimar Republic had been founded - that shaky coalition between the social democracy, bourgeois and even royalist parties-which was destined to collapse into the hands of Hitler's Nazis sixteen years later. Lenin had predicted in 1916 that the revolution in Germany would be slow in starting, but once it got under way would move with the speed of a locomotive. The dizzying pace of events in the winter of 1918-19 completely corroborated this prediction. The last months of Rosa Luxemburg's life were intimately bound up with these events. An implacable opponent of the imperialist war, she had spent three and a half of its four years in prison. The people of Breslau stormed the prison and liberated Rosa Luxemburg from confinement November 9, 1918, the same day the revolution surged into Berlin. Hundreds of thousands demonstrated in the streets. After the Hohenzollern Kaiser abdicated, appointing right-wing social-democratic leader Fritz 2 INTERNATIONAL SOCIALIST REVIEW Ebert "Reich Chancellor," Karl Liebknecht addressed workers from the balcony of the Imperial Palace, proclaiming the establishment of a Socialist Republic to be ruled by the Soldiers' and Workers' Councils. Hours later, Ebert, reluctantly conceding that the power temporarily rested with the workers' committees, set about to wrest it back to the safe confines of a bourgeois parliament. That same evening he secretly reached agreement with the Hohenzollern generals to cooperate in the restoration of ''law and order" - the crushing of the revolution. Luxemburg arrived in Berlin November 10. Paul Froelich, her biographer and comrade in the Spartacus League, writes that her friends greeted Rosa ''with concealed sadness, for they suddenly real­ ized what the years in prison had done to her: She had aged terribly, and her black hair had gone quite white. She was a sick woman, but her eyes shone with the old fire and energy. Although she urgently needed rest and recuperation, there was no rest for her. Two months were left of her life, and they were filled to the utmost with almost superhuman efforts." Rosa immediately set out to do what ultimately proved impossible, although she spared no energy in the task: This was to mold a revolu­ tionary party which could take the leadership of the masses in revolt and direct their struggle toward the seizure of state power. She resisted the rush to deflect this struggle into the electoral path, knowing that this could only result in losing the power of the workers' councils to a new form of the old bourgeois rule. She urged that the revolu­ tionized masses drive forward along the course they had spontaneously taken November 9. As she explained to the founding congress of the Communist vanguard: "The ninth of November was an attempt, a weak, half-hearted, half-consciOUS, and chaotic attempt, to overthrow the existing public authority and to put an end to ownership rule. What is now incumbent upon us is that we should deliberately concentrate all the forces of the proletariat for an attack upon the very foundations of capitalist society. "There, at the root, where the individual employer confronts his wage slaves; at the root, where all the executive organs of ownership rule confront the objects of this rule, confront the masses; there, step by step, we must seize the means of power from the rulers, must take them into our own hands." ("Program for Revolution," International Socialist Review, May-June 1967) However, two major political factors prevented the forces under the leadership of Luxemburg and Liebknecht from mobilizing the masses to carry out this program at that critical juncture. One was the fact that the social democracy did not simply present an undivided counter­ revolutionary face under the right-wing leadership of Ebert, Philipp Scheidemann and Gustav Noske. A large section of the social demo­ cracy, which had split from the right-wing faction on the war question in 1916, was not clearly identified with its policies and acts. This Independent Social Democratic Party, under the centrist leader- JANUARY-FEBRUARY 1969 3 ship of Karl Kautsky, Eduard Bernstein, and Georg Ledebour, finally voted against war credits for the imperial army - two years after the outbreak of war-thereby rehabilitating its image in the eyes of the war-sick masses. But this did not deter the "Independents" from fol­ lowing the same electoral path as the right wing in 1918 and aban­ doning the revolution to enter the coalition government. In the second place, the Spartacists themselves, who opposed the war from the outset, remained as a faction in the Independent So­ cialist Party long after they should have separated from it to promote the construction of a truly revolutionary party. That split was delayed until December 1918, when the revolution was already nearing its peak. It proved impossible at that late date to win over quickly enough the majority of workers to the revolutionary program of the Com­ munist Party, as the new party modeled after Lenin's Bolsheviks was called. The Spartacist leaders realized that time was needed to reorganize the revolutionary vanguard and communicate their line of strategy to the rebelling workers and soldiers. But the impatience of the in­ surgents on one hand, and the provocations of the counterrevolu­ tionary authorities on the other, doomed their efforts. In the first week of January an abortive uprising took place in Berlin. Although the Spartacist leaders had opposed it as adventuristic, they assumed the leadership after failing to hold it back. When the uprising was defeated, January 8, the bourgeois and right-wing social­ democratic press fomented a hysterical witch-hunt atmosphere to cover their deliberate tracking down and murder of the famed Spartacist leaders. Disguised and in hiding, Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Lieb­ knecht were seized in a working-class suburb January 15, 1919, and murdered by cavalry officers the same night under Noske's direct instructions. * * * We are commemorating the fifieth anniversary of this assassination by publishing two of Rosa Luxemburg's lesser-known writings which illustrate different sides of the talents of this remarkable woman. What both the work of literary criticism and the manifesto against capital punishment express, is the profound and deeply moving socialist humanism of their author - one of the few totally principled and uncompromising revolutionary political leaders of our century. 4 INTERNATIONAL SOCIALIST REVIEW Rosa Luxem burg AGAINST CAPITAL PUNISHMENT The mamfestu against capital punishment was une of Rusa Luxem­ burg's first articles in Rote Fahne, the newspaper of the Spartacus League, folluwing her release from prisun in Nuvember 1918. She sets forth democratic and humane ideals fur the sucialist revolutiun un this highly controversial questiun. OJ cuurse it is not possible under cunditiuns uf severe class cunjlict and civil war tu gUa7'antee that such ideals will be practiced. The violence of imperialist cuunter­ revolutiun can preclude this jur a time. But ce1·tainly when the revulution has been successful and has had a chance to stabilize its regime, it must begin tu abolish these relics uf the barbaruus past. It is une measure of the retrogressiveness oj Stalinism that even tuday, jifty years ajter the Octuber revulution, the Suviet bureaucracy impuses capital punishment, and nut unly fur murder and treason, but JCJr such lesser crimes as individual thejt ur embezzlement uf state pruperty. Rusa Luxemburg's jew lines, not the miserable recurd uf the Soviet bureaucracy, rejlect the authentic spirit uf Marxist humanism. We did not wish for amnesty, nor for pardon, in the case of the political prisoners, who had been the prey of the old order. We de­ manded the right to liberty, to agitation, to revolution for the hundreds of brave and loyal men who groaned in the jails and in the fortresses because, under the former dictatorship of Imperialist criminals, they had fought for the people, for peace, and for socialism.
Recommended publications
  • Tolstoy and Zola: Trains and Missed Connections
    Tolstoy and Zola: Trains and Missed Connections Nina Lee Bond Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2011 © 2011 Nina Lee Bond All rights reserved ABSTRACT Tolstoy and Zola: Trains and Missed Connections Nina Lee Bond ŖTolstoy and Zolaŗ juxtaposes the two writers to examine the evolution of the novel during the late nineteenth century. The juxtaposition is justified by the literary critical debates that were taking place in Russian and French journals during the 1870s and 1880s, concerning Tolstoy and Zola. In both France and Russia, heated arguments arose over the future of realism, and opposing factions held up either Tolstoyřs brand of realism or Zolařs naturalism as more promising. This dissertation uses the differences between Tolstoy and Zola to make more prominent a commonality in their respective novels Anna Karenina (1877) and La Bête humaine (1890): the railways. But rather than interpret the railways in these two novels as a symbol of modernity or as an engine for narrative, I concentrate on one particular aspect of the railway experience, known as motion parallax, which is a depth cue that enables a person to detect depth while in motion. Stationary objects close to a travelling train appear to be moving faster than objects in the distance, such as a mountain range, and moreover they appear to be moving backward. By examining motion parallax in both novels, as well as in some of Tolstoyřs other works, The Kreutzer Sonata (1889) and The Death of Ivan Il'ich (1886), this dissertation attempts to address an intriguing question: what, if any, is the relationship between the advent of trains and the evolution of the novel during the late nineteenth century? Motion parallax triggers in a traveler the sensation of going backward even though one is travelling forward.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Pages
    About This Volume Brett Cooke We continue to be surprised by how the extremely rewarding world WKDW/HR7ROVWR\FUHDWHGLVDG\QDPLFVWLOOJURZLQJRQH:KHQWKH Russian writer sat down in 1863 to begin what became War and PeaceKHXWLOL]HGSRUWUDLWVRIfamily members, as well as images RIKLPVHOILQZKDWDW¿UVWFRQVWLWXWHGDOLJKWO\¿FWLRQDOL]HGfamily chronicle; he evidently used the exercise to consider how he and the SUHVHQWVWDWHRIKLVFRXQWU\FDPHWREH7KLVLQYROYHGDUHWKLQNLQJRI KRZKLVSDUHQWV¶JHQHUDWLRQZLWKVWRRGWKH)UHQFKLQYDVLRQRI slightly more than a half century prior, both militarily and culturally. Of course, one thinks about many things in the course of six highly FUHDWLYH \HDUV DQG KLV WH[W UHÀHFWV PDQ\ RI WKHVH LQWHUHVWV +LV words are over determined in that a single scene or even image typically serves several themes as he simultaneously pondered the Napoleonic Era, the present day in Russia, his family, and himself, DVZHOODVPXFKHOVH6HOIGHYHORSPHQWEHLQJWKH¿UVWRUGHUIRUDQ\ VHULRXVDUWLVWZHVHHDQWLFLSDWLRQVRIWKHSURWHDQFKDOOHQJHV7ROVWR\ posed to the contemporary world decades after War and Peace in terms of religion, political systems, and, especially, moral behavior. In other words, he grew in stature. As the initial reception of the QRYHO VKRZV 7ROVWR\ UHVSRQGHG WR WKH FRQVWHUQDWLRQ RI LWV ¿UVW readers by increasing the dynamism of its form and considerably DXJPHQWLQJLWVLQWHOOHFWXDODPELWLRQV,QKLVKDQGV¿FWLRQEHFDPH emboldened to question the structure of our universe and expand our sense of our own nature. We are all much the richer spiritually for his achievement. One of the happy accidents of literary history is that War and Peace and Fyodor 'RVWRHYVN\¶VCrime and PunishmentZHUH¿UVW published in the same literary periodical, The Russian Messenger. )XUWKHUPRUHDV-DQHW7XFNHUH[SODLQVERWKQRYHOVH[SUHVVFRQFHUQ whether Russia should continue to conform its culture to West (XURSHDQ PRGHOV VLPXOWDQHRXVO\ VHL]LQJ RQ WKH VDPH ¿JXUH vii Napoleon Bonaparte, in one case leading a literal invasion of the country, in the other inspiring a premeditated murder.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Smith and Diabolism in Early Mormonism 1815-1831
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-2021 "He Beheld the Prince of Darkness": Joseph Smith and Diabolism in Early Mormonism 1815-1831 Steven R. Hepworth Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the History of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Hepworth, Steven R., ""He Beheld the Prince of Darkness": Joseph Smith and Diabolism in Early Mormonism 1815-1831" (2021). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 8062. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/8062 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "HE BEHELD THE PRINCE OF DARKNESS": JOSEPH SMITH AND DIABOLISM IN EARLY MORMONISM 1815-1831 by Steven R. Hepworth A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in History Approved: Patrick Mason, Ph.D. Kyle Bulthuis, Ph.D. Major Professor Committee Member Harrison Kleiner, Ph.D. D. Richard Cutler, Ph.D. Committee Member Interim Vice Provost of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2021 ii Copyright © 2021 Steven R. Hepworth All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT “He Beheld the Prince of Darkness”: Joseph Smith and Diabolism in Early Mormonism 1815-1831 by Steven R. Hepworth, Master of Arts Utah State University, 2021 Major Professor: Dr. Patrick Mason Department: History Joseph Smith published his first known recorded history in the preface to the 1830 edition of the Book of Mormon.
    [Show full text]
  • MEMORY of the WORLD REGISTER Leo Tolstoy's Personal
    MEMORY OF THE WORLD REGISTER Leo Tolstoy’s Personal Library and Manuscripts, Photo and Film Collection Russian Federation Ref N° 2010-78 PART A – ESSENTIAL INFORMATION 1 SUMMARY Leo Tolstoy’s personal library, which numbers 22,000 volumes in 40 languages, is one of the largest writer's libraries in the world. The library was founded by three generations of the Volkonskys-Tolstoys families: by Tolstoy’s grandfather Prince Nikolai Volkonsky, by his parents Maria and Nikolai Tolstoy, and of course the greater part of the library was collected by Tolstoy himself. When Tolstoy’s wife, Sophia Tolstaya, arrived at Yasnaya Polyana in 1862, after their marriage, she found only 2 bookcases there. Now, as it was in 1910, there are 25 bookcases and one big coffer. So, most of the books came to the library in the last 50 years of Tolstoy’s life. The oldest book in the library was published in 1613, the latest books – published in 1910, the last year of Tolstoy’s life. There are about 600 books of the XVII-early XIX centuries, most of them belonged to Tolstoy’s father, Count Nikolai Tolstoy. Tolstoy’s library is very rich in subjects. The choice of books Tolstoy was buying was defined by his activities as writer, thinker, and religious prophet. Among the books of Tolstoy’s library there are editions of books and magazines, which were used as sources for War and Peace, Khadzhi-Murat, for the unfinished novels from the epoch of Peter the Great and history of Decembrists, for his books of wisdom Circle of Reading, For Every Day, Path of Life.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crisis of the Russian Family in the Works of These Three Authors
    THE CRISIS OF THE RUSSIAN FAMILY IN THE WORKS OF DOSTOEVSKY, TOLSTOY AND CHEKHOV A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Russian Studies at the University of Canterbury by Aliandra Antoniacci University of Canterbury 2015 1 Contents Note on Translation and Transliteration .................................................................................... 3 Acknowledgments...................................................................................................................... 3 Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 7 CHAPTER ONE ...................................................................................................................... 44 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 44 The Family in Crisis in The Diary of a Writer (1876-77)........................................................ 49 The Brothers Karamazov ......................................................................................................... 61 The Karamazov Family............................................................................................................ 65 Relationship of Humans with God in the Family Problematic ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tolstoy SLA 317H1 Fall Semester, 2019 Instructor: Donna Tussing Orwin Carr Hall ???, Wed
    Tolstoy SLA 317H1 Fall Semester, 2019 Instructor: Donna Tussing Orwin Carr Hall ???, Wed. 2-4 Office Hours Tu 2-3, Wednesday 4-5, and by appointment See also Quercus SYLLABUS Tolstoy’s wedding photo for his bride, taken by himself in 1863 MAJOR WORKS BY TOLSTOY (Titles in capital letters are required reading; others are optional) CHILDHOOD, Boyhood and WAR AND PEACE Youth “A PRISONER OF THE CAUCASUS” “THE RAID” “GOD SEES THE TRUTH BUT WAITS” “The Woodfelling” Anna Karenina “Notes of a Billiard Player” A Confession Sevastopol Sketches THE DEATH OF IVAN ILYCH “A Landowner’s Morning” The Devil “Two Hussars” The Kreutzer Sonata “The Snowstorm” Father Sergius “Lucerne” MASTER AND MAN “Albert” The Power of Darkness “Three Deaths” The Fruits of Enlightenment Family Happiness What Is Art? The Cossacks Resurrection Polikushka Hadji Murat Strider (finished 1885) “ALYOSHA THE POT” REQUIRED TEXTS: Great Short Works of Leo Tolstoy (A Perennial Classic); War and Peace (Vintage Classics); Childhood, Boyhood and Youth (Penguin); and The Cambridge Companion to Tolstoy. All of these texts as well as some of the recommended reference texts will be on reserve at Kelly Library. Required texts are available for sale at The University of Toronto Bookstore at 214 College St. (College and St. George). The course schedule is approximate and subject to tweaking during the semester. COURSE SCHEDULE: September 11 Introduction September 18 Childhood, “The Raid” September 25, October 2, 16, 25, 30 November 13 War and Peace NO CLASS ON OCTOBER 9 November 4-8 No Classes (Fall Break) October 21, First Paper Due November 20 Death of Ivan Ilych November 18, second paper due November 27 ` Master and Man Test, open noon, November 29, closing noon, December 2 December 4 “God Sees the Truth But Waits,” “Prisoner of the Caucasus,” “Alyosha the Pot” Course Requirements: two papers, the first worth 30 percent and the second – 40 percent, an online test worth 20 percent, and participation worth 8 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • The Meaning of Life According to Lev Tolstoy and Emile Zola
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2005 Pessimism, Religion, and the Individual in History: The Meaning of Life According to Lev Tolstoy and Émile Zola Francis Miller Pfost Jr. Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES PESSIMISM, RELIGION, AND THE INDIVIDUAL IN HISTORY: THE MEANING OF LIFE ACCORDING TO LEV TOLSTOY AND ÉMILE ZOLA By FRANCIS MILLER PFOST JR. A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Modern Languages and Linguistics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2005 Copyright ©2005 Francis Miller Pfost Jr. All Rights Reserved The members of the Committee approve the dissertation of Francis Miller Pfost, Jr. defended on 3 November 2005. Antoine Spacagna Professor Directing Dissertation David Kirby Outside Committee Member Joe Allaire Committee Member Nina Efimov Committee Member Approved: William J. Cloonan, Chair, Department of Modern Languages and Linguistics Joseph Travis, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii To my parents, Francis Miller Pfost and Mary Jane Channell Pfost, whose love and support made this effort possible iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract v INTRODUCTION 1 PART ONE: LEV TOLSTOY AND THE SPIRITUAL APPROACH INTRODUCTION 2 1. EARLY IMPRESSIONS AND WRITINGS TO 1851 3 2. THE MILITARY PERIOD 1851-1856 17 3. DEATHS, FOREIGN TRIPS, AND MARRIAGE: THE PRELUDE TO WAR AND PEACE 1856-1863 49 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Jefferson J. A. Gatrall
    TSY08014 pp: 1–23 Techset Composition Ltd, Salisbury, U.K. 9/16/2008 Theatre Survey 49:2 (November 2008) # 2008 American Society for Theatre Research doi:10.1017/S0040557408000148 1 2 3 Jefferson J. A. Gatrall 4 5 6 7 CHILD MURDER,PEASANT SINS, AND THE 8 9 INFANTILIZING OF EVIL IN TOLSTOY’S 10 THE POWER OF DARKNESS 11 12 13 In The Power of Darkness (Vlast’ t’my; 1886), Tolstoy examines the nature 14 of human evil in the unlikely context of the Russian peasantry, a class with a 15 privileged relation to the Good throughout most of his oeuvre. Tolstoy’s first 16 major play chronicles Nikita’s rise as a philandering laborer who succeeds to the 17 fortune of his peasant employer (Pyotr) through a murder that is conceived by his 18 mother (Matryona) and carried out by his employer’s wife (Anisya). After 19 marrying Anisya, Nikita descends into drunkenness, seduces his sixteen-year-old 20 stepdaughter, Akulina, and fathers her child. Many commentators—taking their 21 cue from the play’s subtitle, “If the claw is caught, the bird is lost” (kogotok 22 uviaz, vsei ptichke propast’)—have followed the logic of Tolstoy’s plot in search 23 of an original sin, usually locating it somewhere in the confrontation between a 24 backward peasantry and the forces of progress, especially money—a bane of 1 25 civilization that corrupts the play’s characters from without. This same logical 26 sequence can be reversed so as to foreground not the causes of evil but its victims.
    [Show full text]
  • The Modern Stage of Capitalism: the Drama of Markets and Money (1870-1930)
    The Modern Stage of Capitalism: The Drama of Markets and Money (1870-1930) The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Sniderman, Alisa. 2015. The Modern Stage of Capitalism: The Drama of Markets and Money (1870-1930). Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:17467505 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA The Modern Stage of Capitalism: The Drama of Markets and Money (1870-1930) A dissertation presented by Alisa Sniderman to The Department of Comparative Literature in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Comparative Literature Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts April 2015 © 2015 Alisa Sniderman All rights reserved. Dissertation Adviser: Martin Puchner Alisa Sniderman The Modern Stage of Capitalism: The Drama of Markets and Money (1870-1930) Abstract The Modern Stage of Capitalism tells the story of why and how modern drama captured the spirit of capitalism in all its contradictions. Although the bourgeois novel has long been considered the definitive genre of capital, at the end of the nineteenth century, Western theatre was in the perfect position to explore the ambiguous impact of capitalist culture. It was at the zenith of the economic hierarchy of the arts and at the nadir of the aesthetic hierarchy.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 Parini on Tolstoy, with a Postscript on Tolstoy, Shakespeare, and the Performing Arts
    11 PARINI ON TOLSTOY, WITH A POSTSCRIPT ON TOLSTOY, SHAKESPEARE, AND THE PERFORMING ARTS Th is review of Jay Parini’s novel Th e Last Station appeared in one of the early issues of a newly founded forum in the Slavic fi eld, the Tolstoy Studies Journal (TSJ), issue 3 (1990). Twenty years later, in preparation for the Tolstoy Centenary and also for Michael Hoff man’s acclaimed fi lm, I re-read the novel — and found it wonderfully good, better than my somewhat condescending and nit-picking commentary below. Excepting minor upgrades in grammar and some shifting of footnote material into the main text, the review is reprinted without change. But it is followed by a postscript where Hoff man’s Th e Last Station (starring Christopher Plummer and Helen Mirren as the Tolstoy couple) is the starting point for further thoughts on the more general question of a “performed” and performing Tolstoy, one that includes adaptations of the novels, productions of Tolstoy’s plays, and (inevitably) “productions” of the writer’s life. While working through these paradoxes, I was enormously helped toward my hypothesis by Tolstoy’s implacably hostile attitude toward Shakespeare. REVIEW OF JAY PARINI’S THE LAST STATION: A NOVEL OF TOLSTOY’S LAST YEAR 1990 Jay Parini. Th e Last Station: A Novel of Tolstoy’s Last Year. New York: Henry Holt and Co., 1990. 290 pp. Parini’s novel is the sort of book that almost begs to be dismissed by professionals in the fi eld. We know too much, and there is too much to know.
    [Show full text]
  • Simply Tolstoy
    Simply Tolstoy Simply Tolstoy DONNA TUSSING ORWIN SIMPLY CHARLY NEW YORK Copyright © 2017 by Donna Tussing Orwin Cover Illustration by José Ramos Cover Design by Scarlett Rugers All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. For permission requests, write to the publisher at the address below. [email protected] ISBN: 978-1-943657-16-2 Brought to you by http://simplycharly.com To Thanina and Hannah Contents Praise for Simply Tolstoy ix Other Great Lives xi Series Editor's Foreword xii Preface xiii 1. Early Life 1 2. War and Peace and the 1860s 27 3. The 1870s and Anna Karenina 44 4. A Midlife Crisis 57 5. A New Path 78 6. Tolstoy as Guru and Man in Later Life 95 7. Art and Aesthetics in the Late Period 108 8. Conclusion and Legacy 114 Sources 119 Suggested Reading 120 About the Author 125 A Word from the Publisher 126 Praise for Simply Tolstoy “No title could better suit Donna Orwin’s wise and riveting biography than Simply Tolstoy. For the actual man was contradictory and immensely complex; he only dreamed of simplicity. On this massive life, the erudite and compassionate Orwin trains a meticulous lens that keeps out none of the dark but lets through all the light.” —Caryl Emerson, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit I David Hume
    Unit I David Hume ―Hume is our Politics, Hume is our Trade, Hume is our Philosophy, Hume is our Religion.‖ This statement by nineteenth century philosopher James Hutchison Stirling reflects the unique position in intellectual thought held by Scottish philosopher David Hume. Part of Hume‘s fame and importance owes to his boldly skeptical approach to a range of philosophical subjects. In epistemology, he questioned common notions of personal identity, and argued that there is no permanent ―self‖ that continues over time. He dismissed standard accounts of causality and argued that our conceptions of cause-effect relations are grounded in habits of thinking, rather than in the perception of causal forces in the external world itself. He defended the skeptical position that human reason is inherently contradictory, and it is only through naturally-instilled beliefs that we can navigate our way through common life. In the philosophy of religion, he argued that it is unreasonable to believe testimonies of alleged miraculous events, and he hints, accordingly, that we should reject religions that are founded on miracle testimonies. Against the common belief of the time that God‘s existence could be proven through a design or causal argument, Hume offered compelling criticisms of standard theistic proofs. He also advanced theories on the origin of popular religious beliefs, grounding such notions in human psychology rather than in rational argument or divine revelation. The larger aim of his critique was to disentangle philosophy from religion and thus allow philosophy to pursue its own ends without rational over-extension or psychological corruption. In moral theory, against the common view that God plays an important role in the creation and reinforcement of moral values, he offered one of the first purely secular moral theories, which grounded morality in the pleasing and useful consequences that result from our actions.
    [Show full text]