Information Sheet on Langham Place Group

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Information Sheet on Langham Place Group Lesson 1: Enquiry 2: Resources Information sheet on Langham Place Group What was the Langham Place Group fighting for? What was the Langham The group tried to find work for women When, in 1865, the philosopher John Place Group? through an employment bureau for Stuart Mill stood for election and won governesses and domestic staff, and it a seat in Parliament, he included The Langham Place Group was publicised issues that affected women a plea for women’s suffrage in his founded in 1857 by Barbara Bodichon through the English Woman’s Journal. election address, so Barbara Bodichon to campaign on issues that affected Barbara Bodichon had previously been took him on as an ally. In April 1866, women, and to campaign for granting concerned with gaining some rights she organised a petition for him to the vote to women. Most of the to divorce for women. While members present to Parliament, collecting members were successful, middle- like Elizabeth Wolstenholme had also 1,521 signatures in a fortnight. Emily class women such as Emily Davis, campaigned against laws that harmed Davies and Elizabeth Garrett Anderson who founded Girton College, women, such as the Contagious delivered the petition to Mill. Though Cambridge and Elizabeth Garrett Diseases Act, increasingly the group this was unsuccessful in changing Anderson, who was the first woman began to view women getting the vote things, the group kept up this tactic to qualify as a doctor in England and as necessary for changing the laws to when many of its members joined the the older sister of Millicent Fawcett. improve their lives. NUWSS after it was founded in 1896. What did members of the Langham Place Group say about what they were fighting for? The longer I live the more I see I have long wished to see the suffrage granted to women. The possession of an the necessity of women taking an individual vote may indeed appear to be of little value, and I should not myself intelligent part in all that concerns expect any immediate effect on legislation. But the moral effect would, I believe, the welfare of their country, and be deep and far-reaching. As matters stand, the law asserts in a solemn and I am sure that if they had the emphatic form that women are not called upon to take an active interest in affairs power of voting they would feel of State; and it appears to make the assertion on the ground that they are by more decidedly than they do, that nature unfit for any such action. This I hold to be a mischievous untruth, and they are an important part of the believing as I do, that political interests are among the noblest that can occupy Commonwealth. our thoughts and energies I should welcome the removal of a restriction which Barbara Bodichon (founder of the so strongly discourages women from taking their fair share of public affairs. Langham Place Group) Emily Davies (founder of Girton College, Cambridge and campaigner for women’s education) I think that women should possess the franchise, as the best existing means for their protection and the representation of their interests. The interests of all classes of men are represented directly, those of women only indirectly. Frances M. Buss (headmistress and campaigner for women’s education) Task: Construct a concept map of all the things that the Langham Place Group were fighting for. 1 Lesson 1: Enquiry 2: Resources Information sheet on Lydia Becker and the Manchester National Society for Women’s Suffrage What were Lydia Becker and the Manchester Suffrage Society fighting for? Who was Lydia Becker and Lydia Becker decided to use it as a test a legal right to cast a vote. what was the Manchester case. Lily was a widow who ran her In April 1868, the Manchester Society Suffrage Society? own small business; she therefore paid held the very first public suffrage her rates (council tax), which technically meeting and increasingly began to The Manchester National Society for made her eligible to cast a vote. try to recruit working women. Women’s Suffrage held its first meeting Lydia accompanied Lily to the polling In October 1879, they held another in January 1867. Its secretary was a station and persuaded the officials public meeting in a working-class woman called Lydia Becker. She was there to accept her vote. Encouraged area and were surprised by how many elected to the first Manchester School by this, she organised other women working women attended. Responding Board and was particularly interested in householders across the north-east to this, Lydia Becker campaigned the education of women and girls. to add their names to electoral rolls in her journal for the improvement She also created the Women’s Suffrage for 1868. This led to a case in the of conditions for women working as Journal, a record of campaigning and High Court, where Richard Pankhurst chain-makers and around the mines, a guide for new activists. (Emmeline Pankhurst’s husband) although she didn’t manage to turn this In 1867, the name of Lily Maxwell represented the women. Unfortunately, organisation into a coherent movement accidentally appeared as a householder the judge dismissed the case and the and build up working-class support for on the electoral roll in Manchester. argument that women ratepayers had women’s suffrage. What did Lydia Becker and members of the Manchester Suffrage Society say about what they were fighting for? My Dear Sarah, I wonder, Mr Editor, When the ‘woman question’ presents itself to my mind. Why I can’t have the vote; I do not think of elegant ornaments of drawing rooms, And I will not be contented but of the toiling thousands, nay millions of my country Till I’ve found the reason out women, to whom life is no pleasant holiday but a stern I am a working woman, reality, whose (lot) we are trying to soften. Fantastic My voting half is dead, notions about ‘woman’s sphere’ are unknown in a world I hold a house, and want to know where women gain their own bread by their own labour Why I can’t vote instead – and frequently have to bear the burdens of the men in I pay my rates in person, addition to their own. Under protest tho’, tis true; But I pay them, and am qualified Letter to the Leeds Express: 4 March 1868, Lydia Becker To vote as well as you. Sarah Ann Jackson (campaigner for women’s suffrage) Task: Construct a concept map of all the things that Lydia Becker and the Manchester Suffrage Society were fighting for. 2 Lesson 1: Enquiry 2: Resources Information sheet on Harriett Taylor Mill and John Stuart Mill What were Harriett Taylor Mill and John Stuart Mill fighting for? In 1851, in the Westminster Review, Women’, echoing her ideas. When Mill presented his petition during the Harriett Taylor Mill wrote (anonymously) he stood as Liberal candidate in the debate, it was met with laughter from an essay called ‘The Enfranchisement 1865 election, he wrote a letter to the the male MPs. of Women’. Here she argued that Times, arguing for all adults to have the In 1868, Mill tried again, this time women who paid taxes should be vote. The following year, a new Reform with a larger petition containing represented and that it was hypocritical Bill extending the vote to more men more signatures, including Florence for Britain to celebrate the fact that it by lowering the property qualification Nightingale’s, and, though it wasn’t had outlawed slavery when one half was up for debate, and Mill worked laughed at this time, it still had little of the population was still under the with the Langham Place Group to effect. However, outside Parliament, control of the other. put together a petition that he could the experience of campaigning for Her husband, John Stuart Mill, was present during the debate in order to the petitions created a new network impressed by this and wrote his own get women’s suffrage added to the of groups aimed at pressuring the pamphlet in 1869, ‘The Subjection of Bill. They managed to collect 1,521 government to give women the vote. names in two weeks; however, when What did Harriett Taylor Mill and John Stuart Mill say about what they were fighting for? Many persons think they have sufficiently justified the That the principle which regulates the existing social restrictions on women’s field of action, when they have relations between the two sexes – the legal subordination said that the pursuits from which women are excluded of one sex to the other – is wrong in itself, and now one are unfeminine, and that the proper sphere of women is of the chief hindrances to human improvement; and that not politics or publicity, but private and domestic life. We it ought to be replaced by a principle of perfect equality, deny the right of any (…) individual to decide for another admitting no power or privilege on the one side, nor individual, what is and what is not their ‘proper sphere’. disability on the other. The proper sphere for all human beings is the largest John Stuart Mill: ‘The Subjection of Women’ (1869) and highest which they are able to attain to. What this is, cannot be ascertained without complete liberty of choice. Harriett Taylor Mill: Westminster Review, 1851 ‘The Enfranchisement of Women’ Task: Construct a concept map of all the things that Harriett Taylor Mill and John Stuart Mill were fighting for. 3 Lesson 1: Plenary Sheet Enquiry 2: Resources The nineteenth-century The Radical Suffragists The Suffragettes People in the suffrage campaigners movement All four images credit: LSE Library 4 Lesson 2: Enquiry 2: Resources Resources What were the radical suffragists fighting for? At the end of the nineteenth century, the same terms as men.
Recommended publications
  • Issue 61 Autumn/Winter 2009 Issn 1476-6760
    Issue 61 Autumn/Winter 2009 Issn 1476-6760 Faridullah Bezhan on Gender and Autobiography Rosalind Carr on Scottish Women and Empire Nicola Cowmeadow on Scottish Noblewomen’s Political Activity in the 18th C Katie Barclay on Family Legacies Huw Clayton on Police Brutality Allegations Plus Five book reviews Call for Reviewers Prizes WHN Conference Reports Committee News www.womenshistorynetwork.org Women’s History Network 19th Annual Conference 2009 Performing the Self: Women’s Lives in Historical Perspective University of Warwick, 10-12 September 2010 Papers are invited for the 19th Annual Conference 2010 of the Women’s History Network. The idea that selfhood is performed has a very long tradition. This interdisciplinary conference will explore the diverse representations of women’s identities in the past and consider how these were articulated. Papers are particularly encouraged which focus upon the following: ■ Writing women’s histories ■ Gender and the politics of identity ■ Ritual and performance ■ The economics of selfhood: work and identity ■ Feminism and auto/biography ■ Performing arts ■ Teaching women’s history For more information please contact Dr Sarah Richardson: sarah.richardson@warwick.ac.uk, Department of History, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL. Abstracts of papers (no more than 300 words) should be submitted to whnconference2010@googlemail.com The closing date for abstracts is 5th March 2010. Conference website: www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/history/res_rec/ conferences/whn Further information and a conference call will be posted on the WHN website www.womenshistorynetwork.org Editorial elcome to the Autumn/Winter 2009 edition of reproduced in full. We plan to publish the Carol Adams WWomen’s History Magazine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Muriel Matters Society Epistle
    The Muriel Matters Proudly supported by: Society Epistle No: 16 (October 2012) Hello Members and Friends! Our next event will be to commemorate the 104th Anniversary of The Grille Protest on Sunday, 4 November, 2012 from 1.00pm to 3.00pm at MRC/Lions Community Centre, 23 Coglin Street, Adelaide 5000 (located between Gouger and Wright Streets, near Central Market). RSVP (helpful!) to 0437 656 700 or murielmatterssociety@gmail.com. Mr Ron Potts, a highly regarded speaker, has kindly agreed to bring along his ‘magic lantern’ and address us on the history of the ‘kinematograph’ - the technology Muriel brought with her to Australia to ‘vividly illustrate with pictures’ her lectures during the 1910 Tour to Perth, Adelaide, Melbourne and Sydney. Accompanied by her great friend, Violet Tillard, (who may have operated the lantern), the tour informed her eager audiences about her adventures in England, assisting British women to secure the franchise. The secrets of ‘magic lantern’ operation will be revealed!! An event – like the original – not to be missed! (Invitations have already been emailed to members who have supplied their email address. If you didn’t receive an email, and have access to email, please advise your email address asap. Newsletters can then also be emailed. Thanks!) Memberships Due: for those yet to renew, payments can be made at the meeting or by cheque or direct bank transfer via the form enclosed. Please remember - your subs keep Muriel projects happening – thank you! UK News The recent London Olympic Opening Ceremony did feature a vignette on suffrage. Women and girls, in Edwardian costume, carried a suffrage banner in the segment choreographed by Australian Danny Boyle, while the story of the struggle for Votes for Women was narrated by Sir Kenneth Branagh.
    [Show full text]
  • Millicent Fawcett from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Millicent Fawcett From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Dame Millicent Garrett Fawcett, GBE (11 June 1847 – 5 August 1929) was an English feminist, intellectual, political and union leader, and writer. She is primarily known for her work as a campaigner for women to have Millicent Fawcett the vote. GBE As a suffragist (as opposed to a suffragette), she took a moderate line, but was a tireless campaigner. She concentrated much of her energy on the struggle to improve women's opportunities for higher education and in 1875 co­founded Newnham College, Cambridge.[1] She later became president of the National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies (the NUWSS), a position she held from 1897 until 1919. In July 1901 she was appointed to lead the British government's commission to South Africa to investigate conditions in the concentration camps that had been created there in the wake of the Second Boer War. Her report corroborated what the campaigner Emily Hobhouse had said about conditions in the camps. Contents 1 Early life 2 Married life 3 Later years 4 Political activities Born Millicent Garrett 5 Works 11 June 1847 6 See also Aldeburgh, England, United Kingdom 7 References 8 Archives Died 5 August 1929 (aged 82) 9 External links London, England, United Kingdom Nationality British Occupation Feminist, suffragist, union leader Early life Millicent Fawcett was born on 11 June 1847 in Aldeburgh[2] to Newson Garrett, a warehouse owner from Leiston, Suffolk, and his wife, Louisa née Dunnell (1813–1903), from London.[3][4] The Garrett ancestors had been ironworkers in East Suffolk since the early seventeenth century.[5] Newson Garrett was the youngest of three sons and not academically inclined, although he possessed the family’s entrepreneurial spirit.
    [Show full text]
  • The Autobiography of Hannah Mitchell, Suffragette and Rebel Online
    lHnUo (Read free ebook) The Hard Way Up: The Autobiography of Hannah Mitchell, Suffragette and Rebel Online [lHnUo.ebook] The Hard Way Up: The Autobiography of Hannah Mitchell, Suffragette and Rebel Pdf Free Hannah Mitchell *Download PDF | ePub | DOC | audiobook | ebooks Download Now Free Download Here Download eBook #1140709 in eBooks 2015-10-29 2015-10-29File Name: B017DQUNE6 | File size: 27.Mb Hannah Mitchell : The Hard Way Up: The Autobiography of Hannah Mitchell, Suffragette and Rebel before purchasing it in order to gage whether or not it would be worth my time, and all praised The Hard Way Up: The Autobiography of Hannah Mitchell, Suffragette and Rebel: 2 of 2 people found the following review helpful. Thought-provoking insights into the beginnings of the women's rights movementBy Rebekka K. StegThe Hard Way Up is the thought-provoking autobiography of Hannah Mitchell who in spite of her upbringing valued education and fought, first for the rights of the working class and then for the rights of women. I was dismayed, although not surprised, to see how frequently the suffragettes were ignored and disregarded by the socialists - even as they had frequently fought alongside them to secure rights of the working class. Too often the majority, those with privilege, have no problem accepting the help and support of the minority and those without privilege, but when it comes to giving back and fighting for the rights of minority it is suddenly no longer of importance.The Hard Way Up is a fascinating insight into a different, but incredibly important time that laid the foundation of many of the same issues we still see today.
    [Show full text]
  • Proudtameside
    #ProudTameside ISSUE 80 I SPRING 2018 DISTRIBUTED FREE TO OVER 100,000 HOMES AND BUSINESSES IN TAMESIDE Our new Fitting farewell for Our budget IN THIS ISSUE: Executive Leader P4 Kieran P6 explained P12/13 Spring into Tameside FOLLOW US ON AND SPRING 2018 I THE TAMESIDE CITIZEN I PAGE 2 YOU’VE GOT THE SKILLS, WE’LL GIVE YOU THE OPPORTUNITIES To find out more about CHILDREN’S SOCIAL CARE JOBS in Tameside visit www.tameside.gov.uk/workingfortameside Supporting Successful Families Do you work with children? We need you! We’re recruiting foster carers and have flexible opportunities to fit around your life and other work. Call 0161 368 8865 or visit www.tameside.gov.uk/fostering SPRING 2018 I THE TAMESIDE CITIZEN I PAGE 3 Welcome to the spring edition of the Tameside Citizen AS the new executive leader of the council, it’s been a very busy start to the role and I would like to welcome you to my first edition of the Citizen to bring you up to speed with all the latest council news. Living in Tameside with my family, and having been a councillor for the Denton West ward since 2002 and executive member for adult services since 2008, I am very much rooted and committed to Tameside and to creating a better place where we can all live healthy and successful lives. You can read more about my priorities for the year ahead on page 5. It’s only right that we pay tribute to Cllr Kieran Quinn in this issue (page 6) as we sadly said goodbye to him in January following his tragic and untimely passing on Christmas Day.
    [Show full text]
  • Process Paper and Bibliography
    ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY Primary Sources Books Kenney, Annie. Memories of a Militant. London: Edward Arnold & Co, 1924. Autobiography of Annie Kenney. Lytton, Constance, and Jane Warton. Prisons & Prisoners. London: William Heinemann, 1914. Personal experiences of Lady Constance Lytton. Pankhurst, Christabel. Unshackled. London: Hutchinson and Co (Publishers) Ltd, 1959. Autobiography of Christabel Pankhurst. Pankhurst, Emmeline. My Own Story. London: Hearst’s International Library Co, 1914. Autobiography of Emmeline Pankhurst. Newspaper Articles "Amazing Scenes in London." Western Daily Mercury (Plymouth), March 5, 1912. Window breaking in March 1912, leading to trials of Mrs. Pankhurst and Mr. & Mrs. Pethick- Lawrence. "The Argument of the Broken Pane." Votes for Women (London), February 23, 1912. The argument of the stone: speech delivered by Mrs Pankhurst on Feb 16, 1912 honoring released prisoners who had served two or three months for window-breaking demonstration in November 1911. "Attempt to Burn Theatre Royal." The Scotsman (Edinburgh), July 19, 1912. PM Asquith's visit hailed by Irish Nationalists, protested by Suffragettes; hatchet thrown into Mr. Asquith's carriage, attempt to burn Theatre Royal. "By the Vanload." Lancashire Daily Post (Preston), February 15, 1907. "Twenty shillings or fourteen days." The women's raid on Parliament on Feb 13, 1907: Christabel Pankhurst gets fourteen days and Sylvia Pankhurst gets 3 weeks in prison. "Coal That Cooks." The Suffragette (London), July 18, 1913. Thirst strikes. Attempts to escape from "Cat and Mouse" encounters. "Churchill Gives Explanation." Dundee Courier (Dundee), July 15, 1910. Winston Churchill's position on the Conciliation Bill. "The Ejection." Morning Post (London), October 24, 1906. 1 The day after the October 23rd Parliament session during which Premier Henry Campbell- Bannerman cold-shouldered WSPU, leading to protest led by Mrs Pankhurst that led to eleven arrests, including that of Mrs Pethick-Lawrence and gave impetus to the movement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Women's Suffrage Movement
    The Women’s Suffrage Movement Today, all citizens, living in Northern Ireland, over the age of eighteen share a fundamental human right: the right to vote and to have a voice in the democratic process. One hundred years ago, women in Great Britain and Ireland were not allowed to vote. The Suffrage Movement fought for the right for women to vote and to run for office. This Movement united women from all social, economic, political and religious backgrounds who shared the same goal. The Representation of the People Act in 1832 was led through Parliament by Lord Grey. This legislation, known as the Great Reform Act excluded women from voting because it used the word ‘male’ instead of ‘people’. The first leaflet promoting the Suffrage Movement was published in 1847 and Suffrage societies began to emerge across the country. In 1867, Isabella Tod, who lived in Belfast established the Ladies’ Institute to promote women’s education. She travelled throughout Ireland addressing meetings about Women’s Suffrage. Frustrated by their social and economic situation, Lydia Becker led the formation of the Manchester National Society for Women’s Suffrage (NSWS) in 1867. In 1868, Richard Pankhurst, an MP and lawyer from Manchester, made a new attempt to win voting rights for women. While he was unsuccessful, his wife and daughter, Emmeline and Christabel, go on to become two of the most important figures in the movement. In 1897 the National Union of Women’s Suffrage Societies (NUWSS) was established and Millicent Garrett Fawcett was elected as its President. Between 1866 and1902 peaceful activities by NUWSS and others societies led to numerous petitions, bills and resolutions going before the House of Commons.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download MURIEL MATTERS Press
    MEDIA KIT (Duration 27 mins) Muriel Matters, (left) ‘Votes for Women’ caravan tour of southeast England, 1908 Rivet Pictures P/L Claire Harris M 0402 280 506 Julia de Roeper M 0418 842 961 Adelaide Studios 226 Fullarton Road Glenside SA 5065 © Rivet Pictures Pty Ltd ONE LINE SYNOPSIS Adelaide-born actress Muriel Matters made international headlines in 1909 as ‘that daring Australian girl’ for her bold escapades in the struggle for women’s rights in Britain. SHORT SYNOPSIS London 1909, an actress from Adelaide makes worldwide headlines after taking to the skies under a 25-metre balloon emblazoned with 'Votes For Women'. Known as 'that daring Australian girl', Muriel Matters is inspired by playwrights, anarchists and revolutionaries to use her performance skills and bravery in the fight for women's rights. LONG SYNOPSIS When Australian actress Muriel Matters arrived in London in 1905 to seek her fortune on the stage, she was astonished to discover that English women didn't yet have the vote. She joined the Suffragette movement and soon became known as 'that daring Australian girl' for her wild exploits: distributing leaflets from a dirigible balloon, touring England to make impassioned speeches from a horse-drawn caravan, and chaining herself to a grille and becoming the first woman to speak in the House of Commons in 1909. Together with other Australian women artists living in London, Muriel made a remarkable contribution to the fight for women's suffrage, but has mysteriously been ignored in the historical record. This film shares Muriel's love of art and performance and tells the story of Muriel and her artistic friends with verve and gusto.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunger Strikes and Force Feedings in the British Women's Suffrage
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Lehigh University: Lehigh Preserve Lehigh University Lehigh Preserve Eckardt Scholars Projects Undergraduate scholarship 5-1-2017 A Woman’s Weapon: Hunger Strikes and Force Feedings in the British Women’s Suffrage Movement, 1903-1917 Gabriele M. Pate Lehigh University Follow this and additional works at: https://preserve.lehigh.edu/undergrad-scholarship-eckardt Part of the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Pate, Gabriele M., "A Woman’s Weapon: Hunger Strikes and Force Feedings in the British Women’s Suffrage Movement, 1903-1917" (2017). Eckardt Scholars Projects. 20. https://preserve.lehigh.edu/undergrad-scholarship-eckardt/20 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate scholarship at Lehigh Preserve. It has been accepted for inclusion in Eckardt Scholars Projects by an authorized administrator of Lehigh Preserve. For more information, please contact preserve@lehigh.edu. 1 A Woman’s Weapon: Hunger Strikes and Force Feedings in the British Women’s Suffrage Movement, 1903-1917 Gaby Pate Senior Honors Thesis Spring 2017 Amardeep Singh 2 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Context for the Founding of the WSPU .......................................................................................... 5 The “Suffrage Army” .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Working Women's Life Writing and Authorial Competency
    WORKING WOMEN’S LIFE WRITING AND AUTHORIAL COMPETENCY A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillments of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Sarah Nicole MacDonald November 2017 Copyright All right reserved Except for previously published materials Dissertation written by Sarah Nicole MacDonald B.A., Southern Illinois University, 2003 M.A., Southern Illinois University, 2006 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2017 Approved by ______________________________, Co-Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Margaret Shaw ______________________________, Co-Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Sara Newman ______________________________, Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Kevin Floyd ______________________________ Dr. Leonne Hudson ______________________________ Dr. Jennifer Larson Accepted by ______________________________, Interim Chair, Department of English Dr. Robert Trogdon ______________________________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Dr. James L. Blank Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 Life Writing ................................................................................................................................ 4 Devaluation ................................................................................................................................. 5 Truth in Life Writing .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Women's Party of Great Britain
    THE WOMEN’S PARTY OF GREAT BRITAIN (1917-19): A FORGOTTEN EPISODE IN BRITISH WOMEN’S POLITICAL HISTORY Article accepted for publication in June 2016 Issue of Women’s History Review, a Special Issue edited by Barbara Bush, University of Sheffield and June Purvis, University of Portsmouth, titled Connecting Women’s Histories: the local and the global, published by Routledge Abstract This article discusses the Women’s Party, founded by Emmeline and Christabel Pankhurst in November 1917 at a time when Britain was still fighting in World War One. It examines the origins and aims of the Women’s Party which, with the slogan ‘Victory, National Security and Progress’, conflated the winning of the war with the women’s cause. It is contended that global politics on the world stage as well as local politics at home shaped the agenda of the Women’s Party in many differing ways. Biographical Data June Purvis is an Emeritus Professor of Women’s and Gender History at the University of Portsmouth, UK. She has published extensively on women’s education in nineteenth-century Britain and on the suffragette movement in Edwardian Britain. Her publications include the edited Women’s History Britain, 1850-1945 (London and New York: Routledge, 1995), The Women’s Suffrage Movement: new feminist perspectives (co-edited with Maroula Joannou, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998), Votes for Women co-edited with Sandra Stanley Holton,London and New York: Routledge, 2000), Emmeline Pankhurst: a biography (London and New York: Routledge, 2002) and ‘Fighting the double moral standard in Edwardian Britain: suffragette militancy, sexuality and the nation in the writings of the early twentieth-century British feminist Christabel Pankhurst’ in Francisca de Haan, Margaret Allen, June Purvis and Krassimira Daskalova (eds) Women’s Activism: global perspectives from the 1890s to the present (London and New York: Routledge, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Appearance of Women's Politics in the Correspondence Pages of Aberdeen Newspapers 1900–14 SARAH PEDERSEN Robert Gordo
    1 The Appearance of Women’s Politics in the Correspondence Pages of Aberdeen Newspapers 1900–14 SARAH PEDERSEN Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom ABSTRACT A newspaper’s ‘Letters to the Editor’ column represents its readership in an unique way and can provide a useful ‘thermometer’ with which to measure the extent of critical debate and discussion a particular issue generated in a locality. In this article, the letters of women to the editor of the Aberdeen Daily Journal, 1900 to 1914, are analysed to discover the type of political issues with which these women concerned themselves. It is argued that the women must have felt particularly strongly about such issues since they were prepared to take their arguments outside their social circle and to identify themselves as politically active in the pages of their daily newspaper. Political issues dealt with include local government, the suffrage question and government legislation. While much of the evidence used comes from the letters of active suffragists who were usually members of national suffrage associations, it is argued that the period showed an expansion in the type of woman interested in politics, and the corresponding urge to write to the newspapers. This is evidenced in the number of women who firmly stated that they were not suffragists, but became politicised enough to write to the newspaper complaining about the Insurance Act in 1912. 2 The following is based on a study of the letters of women correspondents to the Aberdeen Daily Journal between 1900 and the outbreak of war in 1914. It assesses the letter-writers’ attitudes to contemporary political issues, whether local, national or those perceived as ‘women’s issues’, in particular women’s involvement in local politics and the suffrage question.
    [Show full text]