Lower Permian Palaeoichnology from the Orobic Basin (Northern Italy)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lower Permian Palaeoichnology from the Orobic Basin (Northern Italy) Geo.Alp, Vol. 2, S. 77–90, 2005 LOWER PERMIAN PALAEOICHNOLOGY FROM THE OROBIC BASIN (NORTHERN ITALY) Giuseppe Santi With 4 figures and 2 plates Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Via Ferrata 1, 27100 Pavia (Italia). e-mail: [email protected] Abstract The Lower Permian palaeoichnofauna of the South-Alpine region comes from the Collio Formation only, and mainly crops out in the Orobic and Trompia basins. It consists of traces of vertebrates (amphibians and reptiles) and invertebrates (insects, arthropods, burrowing, probable myriapods, gastropods, freshwater jelly- fishes, conchostraceans and freshwater bivalves). It is poor in taxa and similar to the coeval ichnoassociation of Central Europe, N. America and Argentina. Inside the trophic pyramid relevant to the biodiversity of the lower unit of the Collio Fm., the top carnivore is absent. This role is partially occupied by reptiles (e.g. araeos- celids) having features similar to true lizards. Shifting from the sediments of the lower part of the Collio For- mation to the upper part, impoverishment of the ichnocoenosis composition is linked either to a climatic shift (from more humid towards drier), or to tectonic activity that prevented the persistence of biotope for- mation. The Upper Permian uplift marks a strong ichnofaunistic change with the introduction of Triassic components. Introduction Brief stratigraphical framework In the South-Alpine region the continental For a long time it has been known that the Lower Permian is characterized by vertebrate and Palaeozoic of the Alps is very poor in vertebrate invertebrate ichnofossils and by rare floral remains remains, with the only exception being the ich- (macroplants, spores and pollen). They come nites, which have recently become a great strati- almost exclusively from the Collio Fm. cropping graphical tool (Avanzini et al., 2001). Recent out in the Orobic and Trompia (= Collio) basins, detailed research on the Permian of Europe (main- with the exception of rare fossiliferous remains ly in France and Germany) has enlarged our from the Tregiovo Basin. The features, problems knowledge, particularly of the invertebrates, and and hypotheses relating to the composition, distri- of the stratigraphical-chronological role played by bution and behavioural features of the trackmak- them (Gand et al., 2001 with references therein). ers and the ichnocoenosis variation are also dif- The South-Alpine region is characterized by a ferent, moving from the lower “Collio” to the series of basins created from W to E, as inherited upper unit of the same formation, and from this Hercynian structures have produced structural to the Upper Permian when the faunistic change highs of a metamorphic or igneous nature is profound. These aspects are very clear from (Cassinis & Perotti, 1994; Cassinis et al., 1999 with analysing the fossil beds of the Collio Fm. in the references therein; Perotti, 1999). The main basins Orobic Basin; this article will review the ichnofau- are the Orobic Basin and, to the east, the Trompia nistic assemblages from this basin and discuss Basin (Fig. 1), but other smaller basins are impor- their significance and the problems inherent to tant for their ichnofossil content (Tregiovo Basin, them. Tione Basin) (Conti et al., 1997). 77 Fig. 1: Schematic non-palinspastic section of the main Permian basin distribution of the South-Alpine region (Conti et al., 1997, mod.). 1 – Pre-Permian basement, 2 – Volcanic deposits, 3 – Clastic units of the first cycle of sedimentation (Basal Conglomerate, Collio Fm, Ponteranica Conglomerate), 4 – Verrucano Lombardo-Val Gardena Sandstone complex, 5 – Bellerophon Fm. Permian sediments occur in two tectono-sedi- Gardena Sandstone complex (Fig. 2). With their mentary cycles separated by an uncertain age gap deposition the Palaeozoic ended. (between 14 and 25 My, according to the most recent data in Cassinis et al., 2002a). The first cycle, The question of the use of a two- or three-fold of ?Upper Carboniferous–Lower Permian age, is subdivision of the Permian System for dating of composed of a continental succession of volcanic continental successions has been debated for a deposits (from intermediate to acid chemistry) and long time. A detailed discussion relating to dating by alluvial-to-lacustrine sediments that comprise of the Permian continental beds in the South- the Basal Conglomerate, the Collio Fm, the Alpine region was recently carried out by Cassinis Tregiovo Fm, the Ponteranica Conglomerate, the (2003), Cassinis and Ronchi (2001) and Cassinis et Dosso dei Galli Conglomerate and the Auccia al. (2002b). The traditionally adopted Permian sub- Volcanics. The second cycle is assigned to the division for research in the South-Alpine area is Upper Permian and is composed of the reddish “Lower Permian” (from about the Asselian to clastic deposits of the Verrucano Lombardo-Val Kungurian) and “Upper Permian” (from the 78 Geo.Alp, Vol. 2, 2005 Fig. 2: 1 - Chronostratigraphical sketch of the Permian of the Orobic Basin. 2 - Chronostratigraphical sketch of the Permian of the Trompia Basin. Ufimian to Tatarian, according to the Cis- er referred to the Upper Permian) is evident can Uralian/Russian Standard Scale), and this last rarely the use of the marine stages be justified. For these includes the Middle Permian, corresponding reasons, and in agreement with Cassinis (2003), in approximately to the Guadalupian Series this study the continental Permian “Lower” and (Menning, 2001; Cassinis, 2003, Fig. 1). It is based “Upper” subdivisions are used. on the palaeontological data from macroplants, Therefore, it is Lucas’s opinion (pers. comm.) palynomorphs, tetrapod footprints, and the radio- that in this study the term “Upper Permian” should metric and palaeomagnetic investigations. include the “Middle Permian” (Ufimian and Therefore, the stratigraphical resolution is rather Kazanian), and only the Tatarian should really be poor compared with the marine equivalents; so the “Upper Permian”. As such, it may be better to uti- absence of detailed data and of the wider correla- lize the marine timescale terms (Roadian, Wordian, tions for the continental beds prevents the use of Capitanian, Wuchiapingian, etc.) and not the old the three-fold subdivision of the Permian System Russian terms. The utilized chronostratigraphy into “Lower”, “Middle” and “Upper”. Only in those (Cisuralian and Russian stages) for the Early places where the lateral transition between the Permian represents the international subdivision of continental and marine deposits (i.e. in the the Permian System, but in the dating of the con- Dolomite region between the Val Gardena tinental beds, to leave out the post-Kungurian Sandstone and the Bellerophon Formation, togeth- Russian terms that, in Lucas’s opinion (pers. Geo.Alp, Vol. 2, 2005 79 Fig. 3: Permian stratigraphy (SCPS = Sub-Commission of Permian stratigraphy) (Vachard & Argyriadis, 2002. mod.) comm.), are only the regional stages for the marine cracks, raindrop imprints, ripple marks and fossil timescale, is more difficult for the reasons plant remains, as well as vertebrate and inverte- advanced above. Fig. 3 shows the different scales brate ichnites. of the Permian stratigraphy. This formation is interfingered with the Ponteranica Conglomerate (Casati & Gnaccolini, In the classic succession of the Trompia Valley 1965, 1967). Utilising the fossils collected in the (Collio Basin) the COLLIO FORMATION was deposited on Trompia Basin, the Collio Fm. is referred to the volcaniclastic rocks (ignimbrites) which do not Lower Permian based on chronological data pro- crop out with continuity within the Orobic Basin, vided by macroflora (Geinitz, 1869; Jongmans, but are abundant in other areas (e.g. in the 1960; Remy & Remy, 1978; Kozur, 1981; Visscher et Acquaduro Valley –Introbio- and in the Cedrino al., 1999), pollen (Clement-Westerholf et al., 1974; Pass) (Sciunnach, 2001) and in the mainly “berga- Cassinis & Doubinger, 1991, 1992) and tetrapod mask” sector of the same basin (Jadoul et al., footprints (Ceoloni et al., 1987; Conti et al., 1991, 2000). Other subdivisions of lithofacies have been 1997), and also for its position below the angular proposed on a petrographical basis by Cassinis et unconformity ascribed to the main post-Saalian al. (1988), Cadel et al. (1996), Forcella et al. (2001) phase (Palatine) of the Hercynian orogenesis. and Sciunnach (2001). The Collio Fm. can be infor- mally subdivided into two units: the lower one is composed of grey-green and black sandstones and Vertebrate and invertebrate ichnocoenoses of the siltstones, while the upper unit is defined by main- Orobic Basin ly reddish sandstones and pelites of volcanic ele- ments with quartz, plagioclase and muscovite. It is In Italy, early knowledge of vertebrate foot- well stratified and locally contains some conglom- prints from the Collio Fm. in the Trompia Valley eratic beds. The typical arenaceous zones frequent- was advanced by Geinitz (1869) and Curioni ly contain fragments of black clay (clay chips) and (1870). Later, these fossils were studied by Gümbel display planar lamination, while in the pelitic (1880); the same ichnofauna from the Orobic Basin intervals there are different structures such as mud was analysed by Dozy (1935) and later re-exam- 80 Geo.Alp, Vol. 2, 2005 ined by Haubold (1971). The studies of Berruti enter in the so-called “red-bed ichnofacies” (1968), Haubold (1996, 2000), Haubold & Stapf (defined as a variety of fluvial, deltaic, lacustrine (1998), Casati & Gnaccolini (1967), Ceoloni
Recommended publications
  • This Article Appeared in a Journal Published by Elsevier. the Attached
    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright Author's personal copy Cretaceous Research 32 (2011) 135e142 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Cretaceous Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/CretRes A reassessment of large theropod dinosaur tracks from the mid-Cretaceous (late AlbianeCenomanian) Winton Formation of Lark Quarry, central-western Queensland, Australia: A case for mistaken identity Anthony Romilio a,*, Steven W. Salisbury a,b a School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia b Vertebrate Paleontology Section, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, 4400 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-4080, USA article info abstract Article history: Multivariate analysis is used to differentiate shape variations between ichnites of theropod and Received 9 June 2010 ornithopod dinosaurs. Tracks of an alleged theropod cf. Tyrannosauropus from the mid-Cretaceous (late Accepted in revised form 10 November 2010 AlbianeCenomanian) Winton Formation of Lark Quarry, central-western Queensland, Australia were Available online 22 November 2010 examined and foot shape ratios calculated. Multivariate analysis of these shape variables indicates this track-maker was an ornithopod dinosaur.
    [Show full text]
  • The Early Jurassic Ornithischian Dinosaurian Ichnogenus Anomoepus
    19 The Early Jurassic Ornithischian Dinosaurian Ichnogenus Anomoepus Paul E. Olsen and Emma C. Rainforth nomoepus is an Early Jurassic footprint genus and 19.2). Because skeletons of dinosaur feet were not produced by a relatively small, gracile orni- known at the time, he naturally attributed the foot- A thischian dinosaur. It has a pentadactyl ma- prints to birds. By 1848, however, he recognized that nus and a tetradactyl pes, but only three pedal digits some of the birdlike tracks were associated with im- normally impressed while the animal was walking. The pressions of five-fingered manus, and he gave the name ichnogenus is diagnosed by having the metatarsal- Anomoepus, meaning “unlike foot,” to these birdlike phalangeal pad of digit IV of the pes lying nearly in line with the axis of pedal digit III in walking traces, in combination with a pentadactyl manus. It has a pro- portionally shorter digit III than grallatorid (theropod) tracks, but based on osteometric analysis, Anomoepus, like grallatorids, shows a relatively shorter digit III in larger specimens. Anomoepus is characteristically bi- pedal, but there are quadrupedal trackways and less common sitting traces. The ichnogenus is known from eastern and western North America, Europe, and southern Africa. On the basis of a detailed review of classic and new material, we recognize only the type ichnospecies Anomoepus scambus within eastern North America. Anomoepus is known from many hundreds of specimens, some with remarkable preservation, showing many hitherto unrecognized details of squa- mation and behavior. . Pangea at approximately 200 Ma, showing the In 1836, Edward Hitchcock described the first of what areas producing Anomoepus discussed in this chapter: 1, Newark we now recognize as dinosaur tracks from Early Juras- Supergroup, eastern North America; 2, Karoo basin; 3, Poland; sic Newark Supergroup rift strata of the Connecticut 4, Colorado Plateau.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dinosaurs of North America
    FEOM THE SIXTEENTH ANNUAL KEPOKT OF THE U. S, GEOLOGICAL SURVEY THE DINOSAURS OF NORTH AMERICA OTHNIEL CHARLES MARSH TALE UNIVERSITY WASHINGTON 1896 ^33/^, I/BRAKt 4 ,\ . THE DINOSAURS OF NORTH AMERICA. BY OTHNIEL CHARLES MARSH. 133 CONTENTS. Pajje. Introduction 143 Part I. —Triassic dinosaurs 146 Theropoda 146 Anchisaurida? 147 Anchisaurus 147 The skull 148 The fore limbs 149 The hind limbs 149 Anchisaurus solus 149 Amniosaurus rTT 150 Eestoration of Anchisaurus 150 Dinosaurian footprints 151 Distribution of Triassic dinosaurs 152 Part II. —Jurassic dinosaurs 152 Theropoda : 153 Hallopus 153 Fore and hind limbs 154 Coelurus _ 155 The vertebra:- 155 The hind limbs 156 Ceratosaurus 156 The skull 157 The brain 159 The lower iaws 159 The vertebra: 159 The scapular arch 160 The pelvic arch 160 The metatarsals 162 Eestoration of Ceratosaurus 163 Allosaurus 163 European Theropoda 163 Sauropoda 164 Atlantosaurus beds 164 Families of Sauropoda 165 Atlantosauridie 166 Atlantosaurus 166 Apatosaurus 166 The sacral cavity 166 The vertebra- 167 Brontosaurus 168 The scapular arch 168 The cervical vertebra.- 169 The dorsal vertebree 169 The sacrum 170 The caudal vertebra- 171 The pelric arch 172 The fore limbs 173 The hind limbs 173 135 136 CONTENTS. Part II. —Jurassic dinosaurs—Continued. Page. Sauropoda—Continued. Atlantosaurida? —Continued. Restoration of Brontosaurus 173 Barnsaurus 174 Diplodoeida? 175 Diplodocus 175 The skull 175 The brain 178 The lower jaws 178 The teeth 179 The vertebra; 180 The sternal bones 180 The pelvic girdle 180 Size and habits 180 Morosaurida? 181 Morosaurus 181 The skull 181 The vertebra? 181 The fore limbs 182 The pelvis 182 The hind limbs 183 Pleuroccelida? : 183 Pleurocoelus 183 The skull 183 The vertebras 183 Distribution of the Sauropoda 185 Comparison with European forms 185 Predentata ».
    [Show full text]
  • Jahresbericht 2010 Der Generaldirektion Der Staatlichen Naturwissenschaftlichen Sammlungen Bayerns Herausgegeben Von: Prof
    Jahresbericht 2010 der Generaldirektion der Staatlichen Naturwissenschaftlichen Sammlungen Bayerns Herausgegeben von: Prof. Dr. Gerhard Haszprunar, Generaldirektor Generaldirektion der Staatlichen Naturwissenschaftlichen Sammlungen Bayerns (SNSB) Menzinger Straße 71, 80638 München München November 2010 Zusammenstellung und Endredaktion: Dr. Eva Maria Natzer (Generaldirektion) Unterstützung durch: Maria-Luise Kaim (Generaldirektion) Iris Krumböck (Generaldirektion) Susanne Legat (Generaldirektion) Druck: Digitaldruckzentrum, Amalienstrasse, München Inhaltsverzeichnis Bericht des Generaldirektors ...................................................................................................5 Wissenschaftliche Publikationen ................................................................................................6 Drittmittelübersicht ...................................................................................................................37 Organigramm ............................................................................................................................49 Generaldirektion .....................................................................................................................50 Personalvertretung ....................................................................................................................52 Museen Museum Mensch und Natur (MMN) ........................................................................................53 Museum Reich der Kristalle (MRK) ........................................................................................59
    [Show full text]
  • 80489,,,NATUR,21404.Pdf
    Geo Alp A new yearly journal devoted to · Alpine geology Neue Jahreszeitschrift zur AI pe·ngeolog ie La nuova rivista per Ia Geologia delle AI pi Geo.Aip Redaktionskomitee: Rainer Brandner, lnnsbruck, Diethard Sanders, lnnsbruck, Volkmar Mair, Bozen, Benno Baumgarten, Naturmuseum Bozen Technische Redaktion/Layout: Monika Tessadri-Wackerle Herausgeber, EigentUmer und Verleger: lnstitut fur Geologie und PaHiontologie, Universitat lnnsbruck, Naturmuseum Bozen Chefredakteur Geo.Aip 2: Karl Krainer Referentlnnen dieser Nummer: M. Breda, Padova; H. Kerp, Munster; T. Kotsakis, Roma; S.G. Lucas, Albuquerque; D. Nagel, Vienna; Chr. Rupp, Vienna B. Sala, Ferrara; R. Sardella, Roma; G. Tichy, Salzburg Erscheinungsweise und Bezug: Geo.Aip erscheint einmal jahrlich und kann bei beiden herausgebenden lnstitutionen im Abonnement oder einzeln bezogen werden : lnstitut fUr Geologie und Palaontologie, lnnrain 52, A-6020 lnnsbruck, Austria Naturmuseum SUdtiroi/Museo Scienze Naturali Alto Adige, Bindergasse/via Bottai 1, 1-39100 Bozen/Bolzano, Italy © lnstitut fUr Geologie and jlalaontologie, Universitat lnnsbruck; Naturmuseum SUdtiroi/Museo Scienze Naturali Alto Adige Genehmigung des Landesgerichts Bozen Nr. 12/2004 vim 05/11/2004 Verantwortli~;:her Direktor: Dr. Vito lingerie ISSN 1824-7741 Umschlagbild: Monika Tessadri-Wackerle, verwendete Abbildung von Evely Kustatscher Druck: Walser Druck KG F Geo.Aip In halt Herbert Scholz, Karl-Heinz Bestle & Sebastian Willerich: Ouartargeologische Untersuchungen im Oberetsch Beitrage zu ,Giornate della Paleontologia der Societa Paleontologica ltaliana 2004", 20-23. Mai 2004: Raffaele Sardella, Claudia Bedetti, Luca Bellucci, Nicoletta Conti, Danilo Coppola, Emmanuele Di Canzio, Marco Pavia, Carmela Petronio, Mauro Petrucci & Leonardo Salari: The Late Pleistocene vertebrate fauna from Avetrana (Taranto, Apulia, Southern Italy): preliminary report............. 25 Evelyn Kustatscher & Johanna H.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Footprints from the Grand Canyon: Second Contribution
    SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 80, NUMBER 3 FOSSIL FOOTPRINTS FROM THE GRAND CANYON: SECOND CONTRIBUTION (WITH 21 PLATES) BY CHARLES W. GILMORE Curator of Vertebrate Paleonto-logy, United States National Museum (PUBLICATION 2917) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION JULY 30, 1927 t Sorb �4ftimore (prcu B&LTUIORE, KD., U. s. &. FOSSIL FOOTPRINTS FROM THE GRAND CANYON: SECOND CONTRIBUTION BY CHARLES W. GILMORE CURATOR OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM (WITH 2I PLATES ) INTRODUCT ION In continuation of an investigation of the fossil footprints of the Grand Canyon, so successfully begun in 1924: I was enabled, through an allotment granted by the Marsh Fund committee of the National Academy of Sciences, to visit the Canyon again in the early spring of 1926. This expedition had as its purpose the acquisition of addi­ tional fossil tracks from the Coconino and Hermit formations, and the extension of the investigation into the older Supai formation in which the discovery of fossil tracks had been reported by Mr. ]. R. Eakin, Superintendent of the Grand Canyon National Park. The expedition was successful far beyond expectations, the collection made for the United States National Museum comprising a series of slabs some 2,700 pounds in weight, on which are animal tracks from three distinct and successive geological formations. The old locality in the Coconino sandstone on the Hermit Trail was explored laterally and a large series of beautifully preserved tracks and trails secured, including many forms new to this ichnite fauna, and the Hermit shale, some 1,400 feet below the level of the Canyon .rim, yielded both fossil tracks and plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions in Science
    NUMBER 515 23 AUGUST 2007 CONTRIBUTIONS IN SCIENCE THE XOCHIXTLAPILCO DINOSAUR ICHNOFAUNA, MIDDLE JURASSIC OF OAXACA,SOUTHEASTERN MEXICO:DESCRIPTION AND PALEONTOLOGIC SIGNIFICANCE ISMAEL FERRUSQUI´A-VILLAFRANCA, VI´CTOR MANUEL BRAVO-CUEVAS, AND EDUARDO JIME´NEZ-HIDALGO The scientific publications of the Natural History Museum SERIAL of Los Angeles County have been issued at irregular in- tervals in three major series; the issues in each series are PUBLICATIONS numbered individually, and numbers run consecutively, re- gardless of the subject matter. OF THE N Contributions in Science, a miscellaneous series of tech- NATURAL HISTORY nical papers describing original research in the life and earth sciences. MUSEUM OF N Science Bulletin, a miscellaneous series of monographs describing original research in the life and earth sciences. LOS ANGELES This series was discontinued in 1978 with the issue of Numbers 29 and 30; monographs are now published by COUNTY the Museum in Contributions in Science. N Science Series, long articles and collections of papers on natural history topics. Copies of this publication are available through the Scholarly Publications Office at 213/763-3330 or by vis- iting our website at Æhttp://www.nhm.orgæ for a PDF file version. SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS COMMITTEE NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY John Heyning, Deputy Director 900 EXPOSITION BOULEVARD for Research and Collections LOS ANGELES,CALIFORNIA 90007 John M. Harris, Committee Chairman Brian V. Brown Joel W. Martin Xiaoming Wang Printed at Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas K. Victoria Brown, Managing Editor ISSN 0459-8113 THE XOCHIXTLAPILCO DINOSAUR ICHNOFAUNA,MIDDLE JURASSIC OF OAXACA,SOUTHEASTERN MEXICO: DESCRIPTION AND PALEONTOLOGIC SIGNIFICANCE ISMAEL FERRUSQUI´A-VILLAFRANCA,1 VI´CTOR MANUEL BRAVO-CUEVAS,2 AND EDUARDO JIME´NEZ-HIDALGO3 ABSTRACT.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinosaur Track Assemblages from the Hettangian of Poland
    Geological Quarterly, 1999,43 (3): 329-346 Gerard GIERLrNSKI, Grzegorz PIENKOWSKI Dinosaur track assemblages from the Hettangian of Poland Gierlinski G., Pienkowski G. (1999) - Dinosaur track assemblages from the Hettangian of Poland. Geol. Quart., 43 (3): 329-346. Warszawa. Almost all dinosaur tracks in Poland come from three lowermost formations of the Lower Jurassic in the Holy Cross Mountains: Zagaje Formation, Skloby Formation and Przysucha Ore-Bearing Formation. Floristic remains and sequence stratigraphy correlation indicate the Hettangian age of all three formations. They represent various continental and marginal-marine environments. Fluvial and lacustrine sediments dominate in the continental Zagaje Formation, while the nearshore and deltaic facies are dominant in the two overlying formations. Various ornithischian, sauropod and theropod tracks occur in these sediments. Parallel sauropod trackways reported herein are the earliest record of sauropod gregarious behavior. Moreover, the present paper summarises and systematises the whole existing material, addressing the ichnosystematic and preservational aspects. Dinosaur tracks assemblages are assigned to three parts of the lithostratigraphical succession in which they occur and are discussed against their palaeoenvironmental background. Two general assemblages are distinguished: lower Zagaje assemblage of an inland, humid habitat with both low- and high-growing vegetation, dominated by high browsing herbivores (sauropod trackmakers of Parabronwpodus) and medium- to large-sized
    [Show full text]
  • 6 the Ichnogenus Atreipus and Its Significance for Triassic Biostratig Raphy
    6 The ichnogenus Atreipus and its significance for Triassic biostratig raphy PAUL E. OLSEN AND DONALD BAIRD Introduction We begin by describing the morphology and Reptile footprint faunules from the early Me­ systematics of the new form and follow with a dis­ sozoic Newark Supergroup of eastern North Amer­ cussion of its biostratigraphic significance. Detailed ica (Fig. 6.1) have been studied since the the early locality and stratigraphic information for the mate­ 1800s. Most are from the Hartford and Deerfield rial discussed in the systematic section is given in the basins of the Connecticut Valley; thanks to many biostratigraphic section. Finally, we attempt to re­ works, particularly those of E. Hitchcock ( 1836, construct the osteology of the ichnites and try to find 1843, 1847, 1858, 1865) and Lull (1904, 1915, 1953), a likely trackmaker among known osteological taxa. the Connecticut Valley faunules are relatively well known (although now desperately in need of revi­ Materials and methods sion). Long thought to be of Late Triassic age, all All of the specimens described in this chapter of the Connecticut Valley tracks come from strata are footprints, either natural casts or natural molds, above the oldest extrusive basalt flows in the Hart­ not actual osseous remains of animals. We use the ford and Deerfield basins and are now thought to traditional latinized binominals for the track taxa, be Early Jurassic in age. Similar Early Jurassic faun­ but the taxonomy is one parallel to that of the bi­ ules have been more recently identified in the New­ ological Linnaean hierarchy, not part of it.
    [Show full text]
  • A Late Triassic Dinosaur−Dominated Ichnofauna from the Tomanová Formation of the Tatra Mountains, Central Europe
    A Late Triassic dinosaur−dominated ichnofauna from the Tomanová Formation of the Tatra Mountains, Central Europe GRZEGORZ NIEDŹWIEDZKI Niedźwiedzki, G. 2011. A Late Triassic dinosaur−dominated ichnofauna from the Tomanová Formation of the Tatra Mountains, Central Europe. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 56 (2): 291–300. Osteological fossils of dinosaurs are relatively rare in the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic. Thus, ichnofossils are a criti− cal source of information on Late Triassic terrestrial vertebrate communities. The outcrops of the Tomanová Forma− tion (?late Norian–Rhaetian) in the Tatra Mountains of Poland and Slovakia have yielded a diverse ichnofauna. Seven more or less distinct morphotypes of dinosaur tracks have been recognized and are discussed. Most tracks are partly eroded or deformed, but are preserved well enough to be assigned to a range of trackmakers, including early ornithischians, small and large theropods (coelophysoids and/or possibly early tetanurans), and probably basal sauropodomorphs (“prosauropods”) or first true sauropods. Key words: dinosaur tracks, paleoichnology, Triassic, Tatra Mountains, Poland, Slovakia. Grzegorz Niedźwiedzki [[email protected]], Department of Paleobiology and Evolution, University of Warsaw, ul. Banacha 2, 02−097 Warszawa, Poland and Institue of Paleobiology PAS, ul. Twarda 51/55, 00−818 Warszawa, Poland. Received 12 March 2010, accepted 20 December 2010, available online 13 January 2011. Introduction in Tatranská Lomnica, Slovakia; Slovak National Museum, Bratislava, Slovakia and Nature Museum of the Tatra Moun− Trackways, footprints and coprolites are the most common tains National Park, Zakopane, Poland), and is based upon vertebrate fossils and provide unparalleled information about both data generated from existing collections and in situ the behavior of terrestrial vertebrates in the environments in measurements of additional material that has recently been which they lived (Lockley 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Re-Evaluation of the Late Triassic Dinosaur Taxa of North America
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231845935 A critical re-evaluation of the Late Triassic dinosaur taxa of North America Article in Journal of Systematic Palaeontology · June 2007 DOI: 10.1017/S1477201907002040 CITATIONS READS 129 523 3 authors, including: Sterling Nesbitt William G Parker Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University National Park Service 140 PUBLICATIONS 3,958 CITATIONS 129 PUBLICATIONS 1,433 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Development and systematics of Late Triassic metoposaurid temnospondyls View project Carnufex carolinensis - A new species of large-bodied basal crocodylomorph View project All content following this page was uploaded by William G Parker on 29 May 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 5 (2): 209–243 Issued 25 May 2007 doi:10.1017/S1477201907002040 Printed in the United Kingdom C The Natural History Museum A critical re-evaluation of the Late Triassic dinosaur taxa of North America Sterling J. Nesbitt American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA and Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, 61 Rt. 9W, Palisades, NY 10964, USA Randall B. Irmis Museum of Paleontology and Department of Integrative Biology, 1101 Valley Life Sciences Building, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720–4780, USA William G. Parker Division of Resource Management, Petrified Forest National Park, P.O. Box 2217, Petrified Forest, AZ 86028, USA SYNOPSIS The North American Triassic dinosaur record has been repeatedly cited as one of the most complete early dinosaur assemblages.
    [Show full text]
  • Crouching Theropod and Navahopus Sauropodomorph Tracks from the Early Jurassic Navajo Sandstone of USA
    Crouching theropod and Navahopus sauropodomorph tracks from the Early Jurassic Navajo Sandstone of USA JESPER MILÀN, DAVID B. LOOPE, and RICHARD G. BROMLEY Milàn, J., Loope, D.B., and Bromley, R.G. 2008. Crouching theropod and Navahopus sauropodomorph tracks from the Early Jurassic Navajo Sandstone of USA. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 53 (2): 197–205. Numerous tracks and trackways are preserved in the a cross−strata of the Lower Jurassic Navajo Sandstone of northern Arizona and southern Utah, USA. Tracks and trackways of small theropod dinosaurs are particularly abundant within one 10−m−thick interval. This paper describes a crouching trace from a theropod dinosaur that shows impressions of all four limbs, the ischial callosity, the tail, and tracks leading to and away from the crouching site, and revises the interpretation of a well preserved trackway hitherto referred to the synapsid ichnogenus Brasilichnium and here considered to be from a sauropodomorph dinosaur. It is named Navahopus coyoteensis isp. nov. on the basis of morphological differences from the type ichnospecies N. falcipollex. The ichnofamily Navahopodidae is revised to include Tetrasauropous unguiferus, Navahopus falcipollex, and N. coyoteensis. Key words: Navahopus, Navahopodidae, Sauropodomorpha, Theropoda, ichnology, locomotory habits, crouching trace. Jesper Milàn [[email protected]] and Richard G. Bromley [[email protected]], Department of Geography and Geol− ogy, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 10, DK−1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark; David B. Loope [[email protected]], Department of Geosciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588−0340, Lin− coln, Nebraska, USA. Introduction buttes locality, each comprising a rich invertebrate ichno− fauna (Ekdale et al. 2007).
    [Show full text]