DOCSLIB.ORG

National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet NPS Form 10-900 (Ftav. 648) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form INTERAGENCY RESOURCES 0 VISION NATIONAL PARK SERVICE This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual pro) »rties for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item b] K' in me appiupnaua UUA ui DJI uniuili the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property historic name Baker Ranger Station other names/site number Baker Guard Station/ Baker Administrative Site 2. Location street & number Great Basin National Park I I not for publication city, town Baker fr%"l vicinity state Nevada code NV county White Pine code Q33 zip code 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property I private GO building(s) Contributing Noncontributing HI public-local I 1 district _Z___ 2 buildings HI public-State I site ____ sites nn public-Federal 1 structure _____ 5 structures 3 object ____ objects ____ 7 Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously none listed in the National Register ^_____ 4. State/Federal Agency Certification ASythe designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this 0 nomination EH request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. ^iriibTlT>the property GZl metft&Ojdoes not meet the National Register criteria. LJ See continuation sheet. Signature of certifying official Date feck State or Federal agency and bureau ty K\J meets LJ does not meet the National Register criteria. L_J See continuation sheet /State Historic Preservation Officer Signature of corn merit irj^or other official Date Nevada State Historic Preservation Office State or Federal agency and bureau 5. National Park Service Certification I, hereby, certify that this property is: H entered in the National Register. [ I See continuation sheet. / o I I determined eligible for the National Register. I I See continuation sheet. I I determined not eligible for the National Register. I I removed from the National Register. I I other, (explain:) __________ Signature of the Keeper Date of Action 6. Function or Use Historic Functions (enter categories from instructions) Current Functions (enter categories from instructions) Government (office)________ Government (office)___________ Domestic ( institutional housing; Domestic (institutional housing) ~ 7. Description Architectural Classification Materials (enter categories from instructions) (enter categories from instructions) foundation _______________concrete Other (vernacular)____ walls wood (weather board) concrete roof _ wood (shingle) other brick, metal, wood (log) Describe present and historic physical appearance. continuation sheet 8. Statement of Significance Certifying official has considered the significance of this property in relation to other properties: I I nationally PH statewide I 1 locally Applicable National Register Criteria F%lA flB B C I ID Criteria Considerations (Exceptions) I IA Pie' I Ic I IP I IE I IF I JG Areas of Significance (enter categories from instructions) Period of Significance Significant Dates Politics/Government_______________ 1933- 1936__________ 1933-1936 Social History______________ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ Conservation Architecture____________________ _______________________________ Cultural Affiliation Significant Person Architect/Builder N/A U. S. Forest Service Civilian Conservation Corps Works Progress Administration State significance of property, and justify criteria, criteria considerations, and areas and periods of significance noted above. EU See continuation sheet 9. Major Bibliographical References PM See continuation sheet Previous documentation on file (NFS): I I preliminary determination of individual listing (36 CFR 67) Primary location of additional data: has been requested I State historic preservation office I I previously listed in the National Register I Other State agency 1 previously determined eligible by the National Register %~1 Federal agency HI designated a National Historic Landmark HI Local government I recorded by Historic American Buildings I University Survey # ________________________ CD Other Unrecorded by Historic American Engineering Specify repository: Record #_____ ____ USFS - Humboldt National Forest Headquarte Forest Headquarters, Elko 10. Geographical Data Acreage of property 2.5 acres UTM References A I 1!1 I I 71 4 t 911,01 01 U. ^1 9.i 7.1 -h4.nl i i i i Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing C I i I I I i I i i I I , I , I i , I Dl . I I I . I i I I See continuation sheet Verbal Boundary Description Mount Diablo Meridian, Nevada, Township 13 N., Range 70 E., Section 9, Southeast Southeast \, Southeast ^, Northwest \ I I See continuation sheet Boundary Justification Boundary as described includes the fenced quadrant on which the buildings and structures that comprise the historic Baker Ranger Station are located I I See continuation sheet 11. Form Prepared By name/title Harlan D. Unrau, Historian organization National Park Service, Denver Service Center date May 15, 1992 street & number P 0 Box 25287 ~ telephone 303-969-2254 city or town Denver Colorado zip code 80225 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section number 7 • Page i 1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION The existing Baker Ranger Station building complex consists of 11 resources (4 contributing, 7 non- contributing) located within a fenced 2 1/2-acre flat plot of federally - owned land on the northern edge of Baker, Nevada. The station site is on the east side of State Highway 487, some 300 yards north of its intersection with State Highway 488, the present entrance road to Lehman Caves and Great Basin National Park. The 2 1/2-acre quadrant on which the buildings are located was part of an 80-acre plot established as the Baker Administrative Site by presidential proclamation on May 16, 1911. Seven years later the site became a permanent year - round ranger station, serving as administrative headquarters for the Baker Ranger District comprising the Snake and Mount Moriah divisions of Nevada National Forest. The Baker Ranger Station functioned in that capacity until 1957 when the Nevada National Forest was divided between Humboldt and Toiyabe national forests. The new Ely Ranger District incorporated the former Baker Ranger District, and the Baker Ranger Station was designated a guard station, serving as a work center for the east side of the Ely Ranger District until 1986. With the establishment of Great Basin National Park that year the Forest Service vacated the Baker Guard Station. The 80-acre Baker Administrative Site was transferred to the National Park Service under the provisions of Title IV, Public Law 101-512 (Department of the Interior Appropriations Act of 1991), approved on November 5, 1990, for use as an administrative site for the park. The 11 resources include four wood frame buildings that date from the 1930s. These buildings are single - story gable roof structures painted white with green trim. In addition, the complex consists of a cement semi - cellar single - story gable roof structure painted white with green trim dating from the mid-1940s, an aluminum shed from the 1960s, and a log hoist from the early 1990s. The structures associated with the 1930s compound are representative of those built and used by the U.S. Forest Service to administer national forests in Nevada. The 2 1/2-acre compound has undergone considerable modification since the 1930s to accommodate changing responsibilities associated with management of public lands and resources. The 2 1/2-acre quadrant on which the structures are located is approximately 100 feet east of State Highway 487 in the extreme southeast corner of the original 80-acre Baker Administrative Site. The highway, which was paved in 1947 and bisects the 80-acre site traversing generally in a north- northwest direction, provides vehicular access to the site. The ranger station is approached by two graveled driveways from the highway. One drive, which has a cattle guard at the fence line, passes eastward toward the cottage just south of the office. A second entrance to the ranger station passes east/northeast trom the highway to the graveled service area to the west of the barn and garage/fire cache. Both entrance drives date to the 1930s United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section number 7 pag6 2 and follow their general original alignments. The remaining 77 1/2 acres consist of fenced, presently-unused horse pasture north of the compound on the east side of the highway as well as on the west side of the highway across from the building complex. The ranger station compound is near the east base of the southern Snake Range in the broad, alluvial Snake Valley. Drainage is by intermittent stream flow to the east, away
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Uinta NF Ranger Stations
    United States Department of Agriculture The Enchantment of Forest Service Intermountain Region Ranger Life in the Hills UINTA NATIONAL FOREST JULY 2016 Administrative Facilities of the Uinta National Forest, 1905-1965 Historic Context & Evaluations Forest Service Report No. UWC-16-1328 Cover: Lake Creek Ranger Station, 1949 Pleasant Grove Ranger Station, 1965 “I had a carpenter hired and boarded up the house around the foundation. It was from 6 in. to 2 feet off the ground and skunks and animals frequently got under the house, which detracted some of the enchantment of Ranger Life in the Hills.” Aaron Parley Christiansen, April 26, 1919 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English.
    [Show full text]
  • Manti-La Sal Ranger Stations
    United States Department of Agriculture Commodious Cabins & Forest Service Intermountain Region Handsome Structures MANTI-LA SAL NATIONAL FOREST MAY 2013 Administrative Facilities of the Manti-La Sal National Forest, 1905-1962 Historic Context Statement & Evaluations, Forest Service Report No. ML-13-1437 Cover: Ranger David Williams with his family at the Clay Springs Ranger Station, 1908 “A commodious cabin is being built, and other improvements which will be made will make the station a very convenient one.” – “Building New Ranger Station on Wilson Mesa,” Times Independent, November 18, 1920, 1 The new Moab building “is a handsome structure and affords ample space for the supervisor’s office. eventually the forest headquarters will be one of the most attractive locations in town.” – “Forest Service In New Building,” Times Independent, September 12, 1940, 1. Commodious Cabins and Handsome Structures Administrative Facilities of the Manti-La Sal National Forest, 1905-1962 Historic Context Statement and Evaluations Forest Service Report No. ML-13-1437 By Richa Wilson Regional Architectural Historian USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region 324 25th Street Ogden, UT 84401 May 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................................................................. V CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................... 1 SPATIAL BOUNDARIES ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan for the Great Basin National Heritage Area Approved April 30, 2013
    Management Plan for the Great Basin National Heritage Area Approved April 30, 2013 Prepared by the Great Basin Heritage Area Partnership Baker, Nevada i ii Great Basin National Heritage Area Management Plan September 23, 2011 Plans prepared previously by several National Heritage Areas provided inspiration for the framework and format for the Great Basin National Heritage Area Management Plan. National Park Service staff and documents provided guidance. We gratefully acknowledge these contributions. This Management Plan was made possible through funding provided by the National Park Service, the State of Nevada, the State of Utah and the generosity of local citizens. 2011 Great Basin National Heritage Area Disclaimer Restriction of Liability The Great Basin Heritage Area Partnership (GBHAP) and the authors of this document have made every reasonable effort to insur e accuracy and objectivity in preparing this plan. However, based on limitations of time, funding and references available, the parties involved make no claims, promises or guarantees about the absolute accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of this document and expressly disclaim liability for errors and omissions in the contents of this plan. No warranty of any kind, implied, expressed or statutory, including but not limited to the warranties of non-infringement of third party rights, title, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, is given with respect to the contents of this document or its references. Reference in this document to any specific commercial products, processes, or services, or the use of any trade, firm or corporation name is for the inf ormation and convenience of the public, and does not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the GBHAP or the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 191 / Tuesday, October 3, 1995 / Notices Could Acquire Housing
    51806 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 191 / Tuesday, October 3, 1995 / Notices could acquire housing. Section 235 also (7) An estimate of the total number of originating lender to process the authorized the Secretary to assist the hours needed to prepare the information applications for Section 235(r) mortgage mortgagor by contracting with the submission including the number of insurance and assistance. The mortgagee to make a portion of the respondents, frequency of response, and applications are underwritten certified mortgage payments on behalf of the hours of response; by the originating lender. mortgagor. Many of the mortgages (8) Whether the proposal is new or an The information is needed for the insured under section 235, which are extension, reinstatement, or revision of evaluation of the applications, the still outstanding, were made during the an information collection requirement; Department's financial management and high interest rate years of 1980, 1981, and accounting system(s) and the and 1982. HUD would be able to save (9) The names and telephone numbers Department's monitoring of the substantial amounts of assistance of an agency official familiar with the origination and servicing activities of payments if the mortgages were proposal and of the OMB Desk Officer the lender. refinanced at current lower interest for the Department. If the information is not collected the rates. Congress enacted section 235(r) of Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork originating lender cannot make the the Act in 1988, so that mortgages Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3507, as proper underwriting decision and the insured and assisted under section 235 Amendment.
    [Show full text]
  • White Pine County, Nevada
    Landscape-Scale Wildland Fire Risk/Hazard/Value Assessment White Pine County, Nevada Prepared for: Prepared by: Nevada Fire Board c/o Bureau of Land Management Wildland Fire Associates Nevada State Office 2016 Saint Clair Avenue 1340 Financial Blvd. Brentwood, MO 63144 Reno, NV 89520 Landscape-Scale Wildland Fire Risk/Hazard/Value Assessment For White Pine County, Nevada June 16, 2009 Wildland Fire Associates Carl Douhan Esther Mandeno Dan O’Brien This project was administered by the Nevada Fire Board and funded by the Bureau of Land Management with support from other agencies. Data and recommendations developed for this project are advisory in nature and are NOT intended to replace specific site assessments. At any given time the ephemeral nature of the vegetation may affect fuel condition present within each individual county in Nevada. Wildland Fire Associates and its agents assume no liability in the event a catastrophic wildland fire damages or destroys public or private property. Landscape-Scale Wildland Fire Risk/Hazard/Value Assessment Page ii White Pine County, Nevada Landscape-Scale Wildland Fire Risk/Hazard/Value Assessment For White Pine County, Nevada Submitted by: ____________________________________ Date: ________ Project Leader, Wildland Fire Associates Reviewed by: ____________________________________ Date: _________ Nevada Fire Safe Council Reviewed by: ____________________________________ Date: ________ Bureau of Land Management Accepted by: ____________________________________ Date: ________ Chair, Nevada Fire Board
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form
    NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (formerly 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. X New Submission Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Historic Latinx Resources in Utah, 1776 to 1942 B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) C. Form Prepared by: name/title Kate Hovanes, Architectural Historian Anne Oliver, Principal Investigator organization SWCA Environmental Consultants street & number 257 East 200 South, Suite 200 city or town Salt Lake City state Utah zip code 84111 e-mail [email protected]; [email protected] telephone (801) 322-4307 date March 22, 2021 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR 60 and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation. Signature of certifying official Title Date _____________________________________ State or Federal Agency or Tribal government I hereby certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register.
    [Show full text]
  • Ivheeler Peak Scenic Area
    IVheeler Peak Scenic Area HUMBOLDT NATIONAL FOREST Information The Forest Service designated 28,000 acres as the For further information concerning the Wheeler Wheeler Peak Scenic Area in 1959. The Scenic Peak Scenic Area of the Humboldt National Area recognizes the exceptional scenic, Forest, contact the Forest Supervisor, Humboldt botanical, and geological attractions of the National Forest, P.O. Box 1072, Elko, Nevada range and provides protection for the ancient 89801; the Ely District Ranger, P.O. Box 539, Ely, bristlecone pine forest on Wheeler Peak and Mt. Nevada 89301; or Baker Ranger Station, Baker, Washington. Wheeler Peak, dominating the Nevada 89311. scenic Area, rises in elevation to 13,063 feet, mak­ To order visitor maps for the Humboldt National ing it the highest point wholly within Nevada. Complementing Wheeler Peak are several peaks Forest, send your request to; rising above 11,000 feet elevation. Humboldt National Forest P.O. Box 7 Lehman Caves National Monument is located Baker, Nevada 89311 adjacent to the Scenic Area. Here the National Make checks or money orders payable in ad­ Park Service protects and maintains one of the vance to Forest Service, USDA. largest limestone solution caverns in the western United States. The National Park Service and the Forest Visitor Map—$1.00 each Forest Service jointly operate a visitor center at Humboldt National Forest—White Pine and Ely Lenman Caves National Monument where Division specific information may be obtained from the Forest Service about off-road vehicle use, group Wheeler Peak Scenic Area reservation sites for picnics, and other points of in­ Topography maps are not available from the terest within the Scenic Area.
    [Show full text]
  • SHEEP, STATIONS, and SHACKS: MANTI-LA SAL ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES I Chapter 5: District Histories
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Sheep, Stations, and Intermountain Region Shacks Manti-La Sal National Administrative Facilities on the Manti-La Sal Forest National Forest, 1903-1960 September 2004 Historic Context Statement The Clay Springs Ranger Station on Muddy Creek. Courtesy of Region 4, USFS. by Matthew C. Godfrey and David Strohmaier Historical Research Associates, Inc. Missoula, Montana Table of Contents Introduction............................................................................................................ vii Chapter One: The Beginnings of Conservation and the Creation of Forest Reserves, 1891-1907.................................................................................................................. 1 ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FOREST SERVICE...............................................................................1 SETTLEMENT OF THE MANTI AND LA SAL AREAS ......................................................................2 CREATION OF THE MANTI NATIONAL FOREST AND THE LA SAL NATIONAL FOREST...........5 Manti National Forest ....................................................................................................................5 La Sal National Forest...................................................................................................................6 CONCLUSION....................................................................................................................................6 Chapter Two: The Progressive Era, the First World War, and
    [Show full text]
  • Great Basin National Park Courtesy of Dave Rock/Istockphoto
    ® 9 00 March 2 GREAT BASIN NATIONAL PARK A Resource Assessment ® Center for State of the Parks ® More than a century ago, Congress established Yellowstone as the CONTENTS world’s first national park. That single act was the beginning of a remarkable and ongoing effort to protect this nation’s natural, historical, and cultural heritage. Today, Americans are learning that national park designation REPORT SUMMARY 1 alone cannot provide full resource protection. Many parks are compromised by development of adjacent lands, air and water pollu- RATINGS 4 tion, invasive plants and animals, and rapid increases in motorized recreation. Park officials often lack adequate information on the RESOURCE MANAGEMENT status of and trends in conditions of critical resources. HIGHLIGHTS 6 The National Parks Conservation Association initiated the State of the Parks program in 2000 to assess the condition of natural and cultural resources in the parks, and determine how well equipped the GREAT BASIN NATIONAL National Park Service is to protect the parks—its stewardship capac- PARK AT A GLANCE 7 ity. The goal is to provide information that will help policymakers, the public, and the National Park Service improve conditions in KEY FINDINGS 8 national parks, celebrate successes as models for other parks, and ensure a lasting legacy for future generations. THE GREAT BASIN For more information about the methodology and research used in preparing this report and to learn more about the Center for State ASSESSMENT of the Parks, visit www.npca.org/stateoftheparks or contact: NPCA, NATURAL RESOURCES 12 Center for State of the Parks, P.O. Box 737, Fort Collins, CO 80522; CULTURAL RESOURCES 23 phone: 970.493.2545; email: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Places in Nevada Listed in the National Register of Historic Places
    National Register of Historic Places - Nevada (eff. November 3, 2020) (Listed alphabetically by County, City, then Resource Name) Certain sites listed below have been determined as archaeologically or culturally sensitive and their locations are confidential as a condition of the Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979. Collecting artifacts from public land without a permit from the managing agency is looting, and is a felony under federal law [43 CFR 7 ] and a misdemeanor under state law [ NRS 383.435]. Looting destroys the ability of archaeologists to research these important places and robs future generations of the opportunity to keep learning about Nevada’s past. Please help us preserve important archaeological sites by leaving artifacts where you found them and reporting looting to the appropriate law enforcement officials. NRIS # County City Name Address Date of Listing 99000700 Carson City Carson City Adams House 990 N. Minnesota St. 19990610 97001302 Carson City Carson City Belknap House 1206 N. Nevada St. 19971030 86001655 Carson City Carson City Cavell, Dr. William Henry, House 402 W. Robinson St. 19870622 94000553 Carson City Carson City Dat So La Lee House 331 W. Proctor St. 19940606 05000968 Carson City Carson City McKeen Motor Car #70 Nevada State Railroad Museum 20050906 93000682 Carson City Carson City Olcovich--Meyers House 214 W. King St. 19930729 94001472 Carson City Carson City Sanford, George L., House 405 N. Roop St. 19941219 Virginia and Truckee Railroad Depot--Carson 98001208 Carson City Carson City City 729 N. Carson St. 19980930 04001198 Carson City Carson City Virginia and Truckee Railway Locomotive #27 2180 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Cozy Cabins and a Hyperbolic Paraboloid Administrative Facilities of the Ashley National Forest, 1905-1968
    United States Department of Agriculture Cozy Cabins and a Forest Service Intermountain Region Hyperbolic Paraboloid ASHLEY NATIONAL FOREST Administrative Facilities of the JUNE 2015 Ashley National Forest, 1905-1968 Historic Context Statement & Evaluations, Forest Service Report No. AS-15-003 Cover: The Ashley National Forest’s historic administrative facilities ranged from cozy cabins such as the Winter Quarters Ranger Station (top, 1927) to modern constructions like the hyperbolic paraboloid form of the Red Canyon Visitor Center (bottom, ca. 1966). Cozy Cabins and a Hyperbolic Paraboloid Administrative Facilities of the Ashley National Forest, 1905-1968 Historic Context Statement and Evaluations Forest Service Report No. AS-15-003 By Richa Wilson Regional Architectural Historian USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region 324 25th Street Ogden, UT 84401 June 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ................................................................................................................................................. VI ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................................................... VII CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................... 1 SPATIAL BOUNDARIES ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 TEMPORAL BOUNDARIES .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Humboldt National Forest
    HISTORY OF THE HUMBOLDT NATIONAL FOREST By Fred P. Frampton Humboldt National Forest Cultural Resource Series #1 June 1992 Reformatted July 2008 HISTORY OF THE HUMBOLDT NATIONAL FOREST By Fred P. Frampton Humboldt National Forest Cultural Resource Series #1 June 1992 Reformatted July 2008 Edited by Judith Frampton Cover Design by Robin Nunez TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY OVERVIEW.............................................................................................................................................2 ESTABLISHMENT OF THE HUMBOLDT NATIONAL FOREST...................................................................................5 CONSOLIDATION OF THE HUMBOLDT NATIONAL FOREST ...................................................................................6 HISTORY OF THE DISTRICTS.............................................................................................................................................6 D-1, MOUNTAIN CITY.........................................................................................................................................................6 D-2, RUBY MOUNTAINS DISTRICT ..................................................................................................................................9 D-3, JARBIDGE DISTRICT.................................................................................................................................................12 D-4, ELY DISTRICT............................................................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]