Great Basin National Park Courtesy of Dave Rock/Istockphoto

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Great Basin National Park Courtesy of Dave Rock/Istockphoto ® 9 00 March 2 GREAT BASIN NATIONAL PARK A Resource Assessment ® Center for State of the Parks ® More than a century ago, Congress established Yellowstone as the CONTENTS world’s first national park. That single act was the beginning of a remarkable and ongoing effort to protect this nation’s natural, historical, and cultural heritage. Today, Americans are learning that national park designation REPORT SUMMARY 1 alone cannot provide full resource protection. Many parks are compromised by development of adjacent lands, air and water pollu- RATINGS 4 tion, invasive plants and animals, and rapid increases in motorized recreation. Park officials often lack adequate information on the RESOURCE MANAGEMENT status of and trends in conditions of critical resources. HIGHLIGHTS 6 The National Parks Conservation Association initiated the State of the Parks program in 2000 to assess the condition of natural and cultural resources in the parks, and determine how well equipped the GREAT BASIN NATIONAL National Park Service is to protect the parks—its stewardship capac- PARK AT A GLANCE 7 ity. The goal is to provide information that will help policymakers, the public, and the National Park Service improve conditions in KEY FINDINGS 8 national parks, celebrate successes as models for other parks, and ensure a lasting legacy for future generations. THE GREAT BASIN For more information about the methodology and research used in preparing this report and to learn more about the Center for State ASSESSMENT of the Parks, visit www.npca.org/stateoftheparks or contact: NPCA, NATURAL RESOURCES 12 Center for State of the Parks, P.O. Box 737, Fort Collins, CO 80522; CULTURAL RESOURCES 23 phone: 970.493.2545; email: [email protected]. STEWARDSHIP CAPACITY 32 Since 1919, the National Parks Conservation Association has been APPENDIX: METHODOLOGY 36 the leading voice of the American people in protecting and enhanc- ing our National Park System. NPCA, its members, and partners work together to protect the park system and preserve our nation’s natural, historical, and cultural heritage for generations to come. * More than 325,000 members * Twenty-five regional and field offices * More than 120,000 activists A special note of appreciation goes to those whose generous grants and donations made this report possible: Tiffany & Co., Dorothy Canter, Ben and Ruth Hammett, Marty and Lee Talbot, and anony- mous donors. Cover photo of a bristlecone pine in Great Basin National Park courtesy of Dave Rock/istockphoto. REPORT SUMMARY LOREN REINHOLD 1 ark Great Basin National P The state of Nevada is seen by some as a never- no place is this truer than in Great Basin Nevada is home to ending desert; these observers overlook the fact National Park. more mountain ranges than any that the state is home to more mountain ranges Great Basin National Park is one of the other state. Shown than any other. It is a place that has been country’s youngest (established in 1986), but it here are Wheeler described in rugged terms—brutal, raucous, serves as a refuge for representatives of the Peak (the park’s extreme. But where some see the inhospitable, world’s oldest living tree species, the bristle- tallest at 13,063 feet) others find beauty, both subtle and bold. For cone pine. Some specimens of these ancient and Jeff Davis Peak within Great Basin the inquisitive traveler who takes time to timberline dwellers share birth years with National Park. explore, the reward here is great—a surprising Egyptian pyramids, being 4,000 to 4,500 years variety of landscapes, plants, and animals. In old. ity and expansive views of Spring and Snake Valleys. But clear skies and air quality are in jeopardy at the park. Large, new coal-fired KELLY COURKAMP power plants have been proposed within 186 miles of Great Basin. Four coal-fired plants already operate within 200 miles of the park. Because the area is currently a Class 2 airshed, some degree of degradation from current and planned power plants would be allowed; the amount of degradation could be estimated but not actually known until the new power plants 2 come online. Regional groundwater withdrawal threatens ark water sources in the park. Groundwater rights were granted in 2007 to the Southern Nevada Water Authority to pump 60,000 acre-feet per year from Spring Valley, on the west side of the park, to provide for the growing needs of Las Vegas and other communities in southern Nevada. An application has been filed to with- Great Basin National P draw water from Snake Valley for the same Great Basin National Despite the name Great Basin—which refers purposes. Loss of groundwater threatens Park preserves a to the area that extends from the Sierra Nevada streams, wetlands, springs, and cave systems. portion of the South Range in California to the Wasatch Range in Other issues affecting park resources include Snake Range. Utah, and from southern Oregon to southern the spread of non-native plant species and a Nevada, where water drains inland rather than history of fire suppression and grazing, all of to the sea—this is a mountainous park. Located which have impacted natural habitats. in one of the most remote regions of the Human beings have traveled through and contiguous United States, it preserves a portion lived in the Great Basin region for at least of the South Snake Range. Wheeler Peak, the 12,000 years. Rock art panels at Grey Cliffs are park’s tallest at 13,063 feet, guards three verified evidence of some of these ancient inhabitants. rock glaciers: Lehman, Teresa, and North Fork Native peoples subsisted here until the 1870s, Baker. Because of the park’s elevation gradient, when white settlers took over the land to ranch, water sources, underground caves, and distance farm, and mine. Aspen trees in the park bear from urban centers (the nearest major cities of the marks of Basque, Peruvian, and Salt Lake City and Las Vegas are 250 and 300 Scandinavian sheepherders who carved miles away, respectively), it serves as a sanctuary symbols in the bark in the late 1800s. The park for an extensive variety of ecosystems and also protects the Johnson Lake Mine Historic wildlife. In addition, the Park Service adminis- District, the remnants of an early 1900s tung- ters all of the lands within the park’s borders, sten mining operation. which further ensures their future protection. Cultural resources, such as tree carvings Great Basin National Park has some of the (dendroglyphs), pictographs, and historic darkest night skies in the country, attracting structures, face multiple threats at Great Basin. stargazers as well as adventure travelers. In The harsh natural elements take their toll on daytime, visitors are treated to excellent visibil- cave paintings and historic buildings, while CATHY NORRIS NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Great Basin National Park 3 Note: When interpreting the scores for resource conditions, recognize that critical information upon which the ratings are based is not always available. This limits data interpretation to some extent. For Great Basin, 64 percent of the natural resources information was available and 98 percent of the cultural resources information was available. RESOURCE CATEGORY CURRENT NATURAL RESOURCES Overall conditions 81 GOOD Environmental and Biotic Measures 84 4 Biotic Impacts and Stressors 80 Air 83 ark Water 93 Soils 67 Ecosystems Measures 77 Species Composition and Condition 73 Ecosystem Extent and Function 79 RATINGS SCALE 0–35 36–60 61–80 81–90 91–100 CRITICAL POOR FAIR GOOD EXCELLENT Great Basin National P CULTURAL RESOURCES Overall conditions 66 FAIR Archaeology 79 Cultural Landscapes 59 Ethnography (Peoples and Cultures) 42 Historic Structures 72 History 61 Museum Collection and Archives 68 RATINGS SCALE 0–35 36–60 61–80 81–90 91–100 CRITICAL POOR FAIR GOOD EXCELLENT The findings in this report do not necessarily reflect past or current park management. Many factors that affect resource conditions are a result of both human and natural influences over long periods of time, in many cases before a park was established. The intent of the Center for State of the Parks is not to evaluate Park Service staff performance, but to document the present status of park resources and determine which actions can be taken to protect them into the future. Proposed power plants, transmission lines, energy farms, LOREN REINHOLD and groundwater withdrawals could potentially threaten Great Basin’s natural resources. All require thoughtful evaluation. 5 ark Great Basin National P some visitors may threaten rock art, trespass in park research and monitoring data using the sensitive areas, and damage delicate cave center’s comprehensive assessment methodol- formations. In addition, while the park works ogy (see “Appendix”). The park currently has with traditionally associated groups as neces- “good” air quality and “excellent” water sary, there are no ethnographic studies in place quality, but they are threatened by power plants for Great Basin, and more planning is needed and groundwater withdrawals, respectively, and in order to effectively protect ethnographic past grazing practices and fire suppression have resources. The park did not have a formal degraded park habitats. Staff are working to cultural resources program until a cultural restore some areas. resources manager was hired in 2003. Since Overall conditions of Great Basin National then, the park has made progress documenting Park’s known cultural resources rated 66 out Great Basin National resources and planning for their protection of a possible 100, indicating “fair” conditions. Park Statistics into the future, though additional support is The scores for cultural resources are based on needed to expand these efforts. the results of indicator questions that reflect the Park location: National Park Service’s own Cultural Resource East-central Nevada RATINGS Management Guideline and other policies The National Parks Conservation Association’s related to cultural and historical resources.
Recommended publications
  • Lehman Caves Management Plan
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Great Basin National Park Lehman Caves Management Plan June 2019 ON THE COVER Photograph of visitors on tour of Lehman Caves NPS Photo ON THIS PAGE Photograph of cave shields, Grand Palace, Lehman Caves NPS Photo Shields in the Grand Palace, Lehman Caves. Lehman Caves Management Plan Great Basin National Park Baker, Nevada June 2019 Approved by: James Woolsey, Superintendent Date Executive Summary The Lehman Caves Management Plan (LCMP) guides management for Lehman Caves, located within Great Basin National Park (GRBA). The primary goal of the Lehman Caves Management Plan is to manage the cave in a manner that will preserve and protect cave resources and processes while allowing for respectful recreation and scientific use. More specifically, the intent of this plan is to manage Lehman Caves to maintain its geological, scenic, educational, cultural, biological, hydrological, paleontological, and recreational resources in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, and current guidelines such as the Federal Cave Resource Protection Act and National Park Service Management Policies. Section 1.0 provides an introduction and background to the park and pertinent laws and regulations. Section 2.0 goes into detail of the natural and cultural history of Lehman Caves. This history includes how infrastructure was built up in the cave to allow visitors to enter and tour, as well as visitation numbers from the 1920s to present. Section 3.0 states the management direction and objectives for Lehman Caves. Section 4.0 covers how the Management Plan will meet each of the objectives in Section 3.0.
    [Show full text]
  • Bristlecone Great Basin National Park Summer, 1990 Information Activities
    BRISTLECONE GREAT BASIN NATIONAL PARK SUMMER, 1990 INFORMATION ACTIVITIES Welcome to Great Basin National Park Welcome to Great Basin National Park; an area of surprising beauty and diver­ sity. As the nation's 49th national park, Great Basin enters a select corps of the finest and most valued portions of this nation's heritage which are protected as units of the National Park System. A concept which began with Yellowstone National Park in 1872 and has spread throughout the country and, indeed, around the globe, now has incorporated one of the most superlative examples of Great Basin geology, biologic diversity and scenic grandeur. As you visit Great Basin National Park this season, we hope that you take ad­ vantage of the naturalist programs and activities which will provide a greater understanding of this special place. Join a ranger on a walk to an ancient grove of bristlecone pines, or attend an evening campfire program to learn more of the history, geology or wildlife of the park. Schedules and program descriptions are to be found elsewhere in this newspaper. We sincerely believe that a more com­ plete understanding of what you see here, will help to enhance your appre­ Park Drafts Management Plan ciation of the park. While Great Basin National Park is A General Management Plan (GMP) is Local issues, such as grazing, mining, the mailing list, for their further review new, and changes in facilities and opera­ being developed at Great Basin Na­ interpretive services, fishing and wild­ and comment. Responses regarding the tions will continue for many years, there tional Park which will guide the man­ life management, cave management and recommended directions to be taken is one constant trait which is already agement direction of the park for the special uses (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of a Midge-Based Inference Model for Air Temperature
    Quaternary International 215 (2010) 15–26 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary International journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quaint Application of a midge-based inference model for air temperature reveals evidence of late-20th century warming in sub-alpine lakes in the central Great Basin, United States David F. Porinchu a,*, Scott Reinemann a, Bryan G. Mark a, Jason E. Box a, Nicolas Rolland b a Department of Geography, The Ohio State University, 1036 Derby Hall, 154 N. Oval Mall, Columbus, OH 43210, USA b Centre d0E´tudes Nordiques, Paleolimnology-Paleoecology Laboratory, Universite´ Laval, Que´bec, QC, Canada G1K 7P4 article info abstract Article history: Sediment cores were recovered from Stella Lake and Baker Lake, sub-alpine lakes located in Great Basin Available online 30 July 2009 National Park, NV, in 2005 and 2007, respectively. The cores were analyzed for subfossil chironomid (Insecta: Diptera: Chironomidae) remains. Chronologies for the sediment cores, developed using 210Pb, indicate the cores span the 20th century. The midge communities present in the lakes experience muted compositional change through much of the 20th century; however, the post-AD 1980 interval is notable due to rapid lake-specific faunal turnover. The recently deposited sediment in Baker Lake is characterized by decreases in the relative of abundance of Psectrocladius semicirculatus/sordillelus, Cladotanytarsus mancus group and Procladius, the local extirpation of Chironomus, and an increase the proportion of Sergentia, Tanytarsus type G and Tanytarsus type B. The Stella Lake midge community experienced a shift post-AD 1990 from an assemblage dominated by Tanytarsus type G to a P.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhodes Cabin (#19)
    DATA SHEET Form 10-306 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (Oct. 1972) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Nevada COUNTY: NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES White Pine INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR NPS USE ONLY FOR FEDERAL PROPERTIES ENTRY DATE (Type all entries - complete applicable sections) COMMON: Bhodes Cabin (#19) AND/OR HISTORIC: STREET AND NUMBER: Lehman. Caves National Monument CITY OR TOWN: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT: Baker Congressman-at-lsrge STATE: COUNTY: Nevada White Pine CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS (Check One) |~~1 District [yl Building [El Public Public Acquisition: I | Occupied Yes: QSite [^Structure O Private I|In Process [jyt Unoccupied I | Restricted CD Object Q Both f~~| Being Considered I | Preservation work [;j£] Unrestricted in progress a NO PRESENT USE (Check One or More as Appropriate) Q Agricultural Q] Government 53 Park | | Transportation | | Comments [^ | Commercial [ I Industrial | | Private Residence Q Other (Specify) [~~| Educational Q Military [~"| Religious Q Entertainment I I Scientific- National Park Service REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS: (If applicable) STREET AND NUMBER: ___________Western Region h50 Golden Gate Ave, . 36063 CITY OR TOWN: STATE: San Francisco California 06 COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC: White Pine County Courthouse STREET AND NUMBER: CITY OR TOWN: STATE: CODE a Ely Nevada 32 TITLE OF SURVEY: DATE OF SURVEY: Federal f~1 State STREET AND NUMBER: IN7UIONAL REGISTER CITY OR TOWN: STATE: V CODE T" (Check One) BQ Excellent Q Good Q Fair |~~1 Deteriorated | | Ruins [~~| Unexposed CONDITION (Check One) (Check One) Cg Altered Q Unaltered I j Moved |T] Original Site DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (if known) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE !Freservation-restoration recommended This one'"room log cabin, 19 feet long and 11 feet wide, originally rested on the ground.
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Summary
    Travel Summary – All Trips and Day Trips Retirement 2016-2020 Trips (28) • Relatives 2016-A (R16A), September 30-October 20, 2016, 21 days, 441 photos • Anza-Borrego Desert 2016-A (A16A), November 13-18, 2016, 6 days, 711 photos • Arizona 2017-A (A17A), March 19-24, 2017, 6 days, 692 photos • Utah 2017-A (U17A), April 8-23, 2017, 16 days, 2214 photos • Tonopah 2017-A (T17A), May 14-19, 2017, 6 days, 820 photos • Nevada 2017-A (N17A), June 25-28, 2017, 4 days, 515 photos • New Mexico 2017-A (M17A), July 13-26, 2017, 14 days, 1834 photos • Great Basin 2017-A (B17A), August 13-21, 2017, 9 days, 974 photos • Kanab 2017-A (K17A), August 27-29, 2017, 3 days, 172 photos • Fort Worth 2017-A (F17A), September 16-29, 2017, 14 days, 977 photos • Relatives 2017-A (R17A), October 7-27, 2017, 21 days, 861 photos • Arizona 2018-A (A18A), February 12-17, 2018, 6 days, 403 photos • Mojave Desert 2018-A (M18A), March 14-19, 2018, 6 days, 682 photos • Utah 2018-A (U18A), April 11-27, 2018, 17 days, 1684 photos • Europe 2018-A (E18A), June 27-July 25, 2018, 29 days, 3800 photos • Kanab 2018-A (K18A), August 6-8, 2018, 3 days, 28 photos • California 2018-A (C18A), September 5-15, 2018, 11 days, 913 photos • Relatives 2018-A (R18A), October 1-19, 2018, 19 days, 698 photos • Arizona 2019-A (A19A), February 18-20, 2019, 3 days, 127 photos • Texas 2019-A (T19A), March 18-April 1, 2019, 15 days, 973 photos • Death Valley 2019-A (D19A), April 4-5, 2019, 2 days, 177 photos • Utah 2019-A (U19A), April 19-May 3, 2019, 15 days, 1482 photos • Europe 2019-A (E19A), July
    [Show full text]
  • Isotope Hydrology of Lehman and Baker Creeks Drainages, Great Basin National Park, Nevada
    UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations 1-1-1992 Isotope hydrology of Lehman and Baker creeks drainages, Great Basin National Park, Nevada Stephen Yaw Acheampong University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds Repository Citation Acheampong, Stephen Yaw, "Isotope hydrology of Lehman and Baker creeks drainages, Great Basin National Park, Nevada" (1992). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 195. http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/3kmp-t8wo This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Balkan Vegetation
    Plant Formations in the Balkan BioProvince Peter Martin Rhind Balkan Mixed Deciduous Forest These forests vary enormously but usually include a variety of oak species such as Quercus cerris, Q. frainetto, Q. robur and Q. sessiliflora, and other broadleaved species like Acer campestris, Carpinus betulus, Castanea sative, Juglans regia, Ostrya carpinifolia and Tilia tomentosa. Balkan Montane Forest Above about 1000 m beech Fagus sylvatica forests often predominate, but beyond 1500 m up to about 1800 m various conifer communities form the main forest types. However, in some cases conifer and beech communities merge and both reach the tree line. The most important associates of beech include Acer platanoides, Betula verrucosa, Corylus colurna, Picea abies, Pyrus aucuparia and Ulmus scabra, while the shrub layer often consists of Alnus viridis, Euonymous latifolius, Pinus montana and Ruscus hypoglossum. The ground layer is not usually well developed and many of the herbaceous species are of central European distribution including Arabis turrita, Asperula muscosa, Cardamine bulbifera, Limodorum abortivum, Orthilia seconda and Saxifraga rotundifolia. Of the conifer forests, Pinus nigra (black pine) often forms the dominant species particularly in Bulgaria, Serbia and in the Rhodope massif. Associated trees may include Taxus buccata and the endemic Abies bovisii-regis (Macedonian fir), while the shrub layer typically includes Daphne blagayana, Erica carnea and the endemic Bruckenthalia spiculifolia (Ericaceae). In some areas there is a conifer forest above the black pine zone from about 1300 m to 2400 m in which the endemic Pinus heldreichii (Bosnian pine) predominates. It is often rather open possibly as a consequence of repeated fires.
    [Show full text]
  • Uinta NF Ranger Stations
    United States Department of Agriculture The Enchantment of Forest Service Intermountain Region Ranger Life in the Hills UINTA NATIONAL FOREST JULY 2016 Administrative Facilities of the Uinta National Forest, 1905-1965 Historic Context & Evaluations Forest Service Report No. UWC-16-1328 Cover: Lake Creek Ranger Station, 1949 Pleasant Grove Ranger Station, 1965 “I had a carpenter hired and boarded up the house around the foundation. It was from 6 in. to 2 feet off the ground and skunks and animals frequently got under the house, which detracted some of the enchantment of Ranger Life in the Hills.” Aaron Parley Christiansen, April 26, 1919 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English.
    [Show full text]
  • Manti-La Sal Ranger Stations
    United States Department of Agriculture Commodious Cabins & Forest Service Intermountain Region Handsome Structures MANTI-LA SAL NATIONAL FOREST MAY 2013 Administrative Facilities of the Manti-La Sal National Forest, 1905-1962 Historic Context Statement & Evaluations, Forest Service Report No. ML-13-1437 Cover: Ranger David Williams with his family at the Clay Springs Ranger Station, 1908 “A commodious cabin is being built, and other improvements which will be made will make the station a very convenient one.” – “Building New Ranger Station on Wilson Mesa,” Times Independent, November 18, 1920, 1 The new Moab building “is a handsome structure and affords ample space for the supervisor’s office. eventually the forest headquarters will be one of the most attractive locations in town.” – “Forest Service In New Building,” Times Independent, September 12, 1940, 1. Commodious Cabins and Handsome Structures Administrative Facilities of the Manti-La Sal National Forest, 1905-1962 Historic Context Statement and Evaluations Forest Service Report No. ML-13-1437 By Richa Wilson Regional Architectural Historian USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region 324 25th Street Ogden, UT 84401 May 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................................................................. V CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................... 1 SPATIAL BOUNDARIES ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Ecoregions of the United States
    (iii) ~ Agrl~:::~~;~":,c ullur. Description of the ~:::;. Ecoregions of the ==-'Number 1391 United States •• .~ • /..';;\:?;;.. \ United State. (;lAn) Department of Description of the .~ Agriculture Forest Ecoregions of the Service October United States 1980 Compiled by Robert G. Bailey Formerly Regional geographer, Intermountain Region; currently geographer, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Prepared in cooperation with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and originally published as an unnumbered publication by the Intermountain Region, USDA Forest Service, Ogden, Utah In April 1979, the Agency leaders of the Bureau of Land Manage­ ment, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, Geological Survey, and Soil Conservation Service endorsed the concept of a national classification system developed by the Resources Evaluation Tech­ niques Program at the Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, to be used for renewable resources evaluation. The classifica­ tion system consists of four components (vegetation, soil, landform, and water), a proposed procedure for integrating the components into ecological response units, and a programmed procedure for integrating the ecological response units into ecosystem associations. The classification system described here is the result of literature synthesis and limited field testing and evaluation. It presents one procedure for defining, describing, and displaying ecosystems with respect to geographical distribution. The system and others are undergoing rigorous evaluation to determine the most appropriate procedure for defining and describing ecosystem associations. Bailey, Robert G. 1980. Description of the ecoregions of the United States. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Miscellaneous Publication No. 1391, 77 pp. This publication briefly describes and illustrates the Nation's ecosystem regions as shown in the 1976 map, "Ecoregions of the United States." A copy of this map, described in the Introduction, can be found between the last page and the back cover of this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Altitudinal and Polar Treelines in the Northern Hemisphere – Causes and Response to Climate Change
    Umbruch 79 (3) 05.08.2010 23:45 Uhr Seite 139 Polarforschung 79 (3), 139 – 153, 2009 (erschienen 2010 Altitudinal and Polar Treelines in the Northern Hemisphere – Causes and Response to Climate Change by Friedrich-Karl Holtmeier1* and Gabriele Broll2 Abstract: This paper provides an overview on the main treeline-controlling dem Vorrücken der Baumgrenze in größere, wesentlich windigere Höhen factors and on the regional variety as well as on heterogeneity and response to relativ zunehmen. Die Verlagerung der Baumgrenze in größere Höhen und changing environmental conditions of both altitudinal and northern treelines. weiter nach Norden wird zu grundlegenden Veränderungen der Landschaft in From a global viewpoint, treeline position can be attributed to heat deficiency. den Hochgebirgen und am Rande von Subarktis/Arktis führen, die auch wirt- At smaller scales however, treeline position, spatial pattern and dynamics schaftliche Folgen haben werden. depend on multiple and often elusive interactions due to many natural factors and human impact. After the end of the Little Ice Age climate warming initiated tree establishment within the treeline ecotone and beyond the upper INTRODUCTION and northern tree limit. Tree establishment peaked from the 1920s to the 1940s and resumed again in the 1970s. Regional and local variations occur. In most areas, tree recruitment has been most successful in the treeline ecotone Global warming since the end of the “Little Ice Age” (about while new trees are still sporadic in the adjacent alpine or northern tundra. 1900) is bringing about socio-economic changes, shrinking Lack of local seed sources has often delayed tree advance to higher elevation.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet
    NPS Form 10-900 (Ftav. 648) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form INTERAGENCY RESOURCES 0 VISION NATIONAL PARK SERVICE This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual pro) »rties for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item b] K' in me appiupnaua UUA ui DJI uniuili the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property historic name Baker Ranger Station other names/site number Baker Guard Station/ Baker Administrative Site 2. Location street & number Great Basin National Park I I not for publication city, town Baker fr%"l vicinity state Nevada code NV county White Pine code Q33 zip code 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property I private GO building(s) Contributing Noncontributing HI public-local I 1 district _Z___ 2 buildings HI public-State I site ____ sites nn public-Federal 1 structure _____ 5 structures 3 object ____ objects ____ 7 Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously none listed in the National Register ^_____ 4. State/Federal Agency Certification ASythe designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this 0 nomination EH request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]