DOCSLIB.ORG

SHEEP, STATIONS, and SHACKS: MANTI-LA SAL ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES I Chapter 5: District Histories

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SHEEP, STATIONS, and SHACKS: MANTI-LA SAL ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES I Chapter 5: District Histories United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Sheep, Stations, and Intermountain Region Shacks Manti-La Sal National Administrative Facilities on the Manti-La Sal Forest National Forest, 1903-1960 September 2004 Historic Context Statement The Clay Springs Ranger Station on Muddy Creek. Courtesy of Region 4, USFS. by Matthew C. Godfrey and David Strohmaier Historical Research Associates, Inc. Missoula, Montana Table of Contents Introduction............................................................................................................ vii Chapter One: The Beginnings of Conservation and the Creation of Forest Reserves, 1891-1907.................................................................................................................. 1 ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FOREST SERVICE...............................................................................1 SETTLEMENT OF THE MANTI AND LA SAL AREAS ......................................................................2 CREATION OF THE MANTI NATIONAL FOREST AND THE LA SAL NATIONAL FOREST...........5 Manti National Forest ....................................................................................................................5 La Sal National Forest...................................................................................................................6 CONCLUSION....................................................................................................................................6 Chapter Two: The Progressive Era, the First World War, and the 1920s.................................... 9 INITIAL ADMINISTRATION OF THE MANTI NATIONAL FOREST AND LA SAL NATIONAL FOREST .............................................................................................................................................9 Manti National Forest ..................................................................................................................10 La Sal National Forest.................................................................................................................14 THE FIRST WORLD WAR AND THE MANTI AND LA SAL NATIONAL FORESTS.......................16 ADDITIONS AND BOUNDARY CHANGES, 1908-1928..................................................................18 Manti National Forest ..................................................................................................................19 La Sal National Forest.................................................................................................................19 FOREST IMPROVEMENTS.............................................................................................................20 Manti National Forest ..................................................................................................................20 La Sal National Forest.................................................................................................................21 FIRE..................................................................................................................................................21 Manti National Forest ..................................................................................................................21 La Sal National Forest.................................................................................................................22 CONCLUSION..................................................................................................................................22 Chapter Three: The Great Depression and the New Deal Era, 1929-1940 ................................... 27 THE CIVILIAN CONSERVATION CORPS.......................................................................................27 Manti National Forest ..................................................................................................................27 La Sal National Forest.................................................................................................................28 OTHER RELIEF PROGRAMS .........................................................................................................29 ADMINISTRATION OF THE MANTI AND LA SAL NATIONAL FORESTS, 1929-1940..................30 Manti National Forest ..................................................................................................................30 La Sal National Forest.................................................................................................................31 CONCLUSION..................................................................................................................................33 Chapter Four: The Second World War and the Post-War Era, 1941-1960 ................................. 37 ADMINISTRATION OF THE MANTI NATIONAL FOREST AND LA SAL NATIONAL FOREST.....37 Manti National Forest ..................................................................................................................37 La Sal National Forest.................................................................................................................40 Consolidation of the Manti and La Sal National Forests .............................................................41 CONCLUSION..................................................................................................................................46 SHEEP, STATIONS, AND SHACKS: MANTI-LA SAL ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES I Chapter 5: District Histories .................................................................................................... 49 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................49 FERRON RANGER DISTRICT ........................................................................................................50 Castle Dale Administrative Site ...................................................................................................51 Ferron Administrative Site ...........................................................................................................53 Ferron Reservoir Administrative Site (Indian Creek)...................................................................53 Orange Olsen Administrative Site (Joes Valley) .........................................................................54 Seely Creek Guard Station..........................................................................................................55 White Mountain Cabin .................................................................................................................55 Other Administrative Sites...........................................................................................................56 Clay Springs Administrative Site (Ranger Station)..................................................................................56 Cottonwood Corral..................................................................................................................................56 Park Administrative Site (Lower Joes Valley) .........................................................................................57 Snow Lake Administrative Site ...............................................................................................................57 Stevens Creek Administrative Site..........................................................................................................58 Upper Joes Administrative Site (Ranger Station) ...................................................................................58 PRICE RANGER DISTRICT.............................................................................................................59 Mammoth Guard Station .............................................................................................................59 Stuart Guard Station....................................................................................................................61 Price Administrative Site/Yard.....................................................................................................62 Other Administrative Sites...........................................................................................................62 Bear Creek Administrative Site...............................................................................................................62 Canyon View Administrative Site............................................................................................................63 Gentry Administrative Site ......................................................................................................................63 Lake Administrative Site .........................................................................................................................63 Miller's Flat Administrative Site ...............................................................................................................63 No. 5 Administrative Site ........................................................................................................................64 No. 7 Administrative Site ........................................................................................................................64 Rolfson's Canyon Administrative Site .....................................................................................................64 Willow Swamp Administrative Site..........................................................................................................64
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Diagram Illustrating Presidential Proclamation
    DIAGRAM ILLUSTRATING PRESIDENTIAL PROCLAMATION Monitor National Forest, Nevada: Diagram forming a part of Proclamation dated April 15, 1907. Forest Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. 1907. Scale, ca. 1:316,880. No geographic coordinates. Public land (Township & Range) grid. Black & white. 51 x 24 cm., folded to 34 x 21 cm. Relief shown by hachures. Shows national forest boundaries, roads, ranches, and streams. Indicates location of the 39th parallel and in lower margin, “117º West from Washington.” Includes 5 blank legend boxes. “Mt. Diablo Meridian.” Holdings: LC; NA U.S. FOREST SERVICE FOLIO See Forest Atlas of the National Forests of the United States: Toiyabe Folio. (1909, sheets, 5, 10, 11, 17, 18, 23, 24, 26, 27 & 28) below for coverage of the Monitor National Forest in folio format. MONTICELLO FOREST RESERVE & NATIONAL FOREST, UTAH 1907-1908 The Monticello National Forest combined with the La Sal National Forest to establish the La Salle National Forest in 1908. The Monticello National Forest was named for the nearby town (Van Cott, page 256). Now the area forms the Monticello Section, LaSal Division of the Manti-LaSal National Forest. Under the Utah Wilderness Act of 1984, the 47,116 acre Dark Canyon Wilderness was established on the former Monticello National Forest. Moab, Utah served as the administrative headquarters of the Monticello, the same headquarters as the La Sal National Forest. It now forms the La Sal Division – Monticello of the Manti-LaSal National Forest. ADMINISTRATIVE HISTORY 1) 1907, February 6 *Proclamation, 34 Stat. 3272 Established Forest Reserve on 214,270 gross acres. 2) 1907, December 12 *Proclamation 783, 35 Stat.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: a Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators
    USDA United States Department of Agriculture Research Natural Areas on Forest Service National Forest System Lands Rocky Mountain Research Station in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, General Technical Report RMRS-CTR-69 Utah, and Western Wyoming: February 2001 A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and E'ducators Angela G. Evenden Melinda Moeur J. Stephen Shelly Shannon F. Kimball Charles A. Wellner Abstract Evenden, Angela G.; Moeur, Melinda; Shelly, J. Stephen; Kimball, Shannon F.; Wellner, Charles A. 2001. Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-69. Ogden, UT: U.S. Departmentof Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 84 p. This guidebook is intended to familiarize land resource managers, scientists, educators, and others with Research Natural Areas (RNAs) managed by the USDA Forest Service in the Northern Rocky Mountains and lntermountain West. This guidebook facilitates broader recognitionand use of these valuable natural areas by describing the RNA network, past and current research and monitoring, management, and how to use RNAs. About The Authors Angela G. Evenden is biological inventory and monitoring project leader with the National Park Service -NorthernColorado Plateau Network in Moab, UT. She was formerly the Natural Areas Program Manager for the Rocky Mountain Research Station, Northern Region and lntermountain Region of the USDA Forest Service. Melinda Moeur is Research Forester with the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain ResearchStation in Moscow, ID, and one of four Research Natural Areas Coordinators from the Rocky Mountain Research Station. J. Stephen Shelly is Regional Botanist and Research Natural Areas Coordinator with the USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Headquarters Office in Missoula, MT.
    [Show full text]
  • The Frontiers of American Grand Strategy: Settlers, Elites, and the Standing Army in America’S Indian Wars
    THE FRONTIERS OF AMERICAN GRAND STRATEGY: SETTLERS, ELITES, AND THE STANDING ARMY IN AMERICA’S INDIAN WARS A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Government By Andrew Alden Szarejko, M.A. Washington, D.C. August 11, 2020 Copyright 2020 by Andrew Alden Szarejko All Rights Reserved ii THE FRONTIERS OF AMERICAN GRAND STRATEGY: SETTLERS, ELITES, AND THE STANDING ARMY IN AMERICA’S INDIAN WARS Andrew Alden Szarejko, M.A. Thesis Advisor: Andrew O. Bennett, Ph.D. ABSTRACT Much work on U.S. grand strategy focuses on the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. If the United States did have a grand strategy before that, IR scholars often pay little attention to it, and when they do, they rarely agree on how best to characterize it. I show that federal political elites generally wanted to expand the territorial reach of the United States and its relative power, but they sought to expand while avoiding war with European powers and Native nations alike. I focus on U.S. wars with Native nations to show how domestic conditions created a disjuncture between the principles and practice of this grand strategy. Indeed, in many of America’s so- called Indian Wars, U.S. settlers were the ones to initiate conflict, and they eventually brought federal officials into wars that the elites would have preferred to avoid. I develop an explanation for settler success and failure in doing so. I focus on the ways that settlers’ two faits accomplis— the act of settling on disputed territory without authorization and the act of initiating violent conflict with Native nations—affected federal decision-making by putting pressure on speculators and local elites to lobby federal officials for military intervention, by causing federal officials to fear that settlers would create their own states or ally with foreign powers, and by eroding the credibility of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Uinta NF Ranger Stations
    United States Department of Agriculture The Enchantment of Forest Service Intermountain Region Ranger Life in the Hills UINTA NATIONAL FOREST JULY 2016 Administrative Facilities of the Uinta National Forest, 1905-1965 Historic Context & Evaluations Forest Service Report No. UWC-16-1328 Cover: Lake Creek Ranger Station, 1949 Pleasant Grove Ranger Station, 1965 “I had a carpenter hired and boarded up the house around the foundation. It was from 6 in. to 2 feet off the ground and skunks and animals frequently got under the house, which detracted some of the enchantment of Ranger Life in the Hills.” Aaron Parley Christiansen, April 26, 1919 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English.
    [Show full text]
  • Manti-La Sal Ranger Stations
    United States Department of Agriculture Commodious Cabins & Forest Service Intermountain Region Handsome Structures MANTI-LA SAL NATIONAL FOREST MAY 2013 Administrative Facilities of the Manti-La Sal National Forest, 1905-1962 Historic Context Statement & Evaluations, Forest Service Report No. ML-13-1437 Cover: Ranger David Williams with his family at the Clay Springs Ranger Station, 1908 “A commodious cabin is being built, and other improvements which will be made will make the station a very convenient one.” – “Building New Ranger Station on Wilson Mesa,” Times Independent, November 18, 1920, 1 The new Moab building “is a handsome structure and affords ample space for the supervisor’s office. eventually the forest headquarters will be one of the most attractive locations in town.” – “Forest Service In New Building,” Times Independent, September 12, 1940, 1. Commodious Cabins and Handsome Structures Administrative Facilities of the Manti-La Sal National Forest, 1905-1962 Historic Context Statement and Evaluations Forest Service Report No. ML-13-1437 By Richa Wilson Regional Architectural Historian USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region 324 25th Street Ogden, UT 84401 May 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................................................................. V CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................... 1 SPATIAL BOUNDARIES ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet
    NPS Form 10-900 (Ftav. 648) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form INTERAGENCY RESOURCES 0 VISION NATIONAL PARK SERVICE This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual pro) »rties for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item b] K' in me appiupnaua UUA ui DJI uniuili the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property historic name Baker Ranger Station other names/site number Baker Guard Station/ Baker Administrative Site 2. Location street & number Great Basin National Park I I not for publication city, town Baker fr%"l vicinity state Nevada code NV county White Pine code Q33 zip code 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property I private GO building(s) Contributing Noncontributing HI public-local I 1 district _Z___ 2 buildings HI public-State I site ____ sites nn public-Federal 1 structure _____ 5 structures 3 object ____ objects ____ 7 Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously none listed in the National Register ^_____ 4. State/Federal Agency Certification ASythe designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this 0 nomination EH request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Albert F. Potter, First Chief of Grazing, US Forest
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository) Depository) 7-2005 Beginnings of Range Management: Albert F. Potter, First Chief of Grazing, U.S. Forest Service, and Photographic Comparison of his 1902 Forest Reserve Survey in Utah with Conditions 100 Year Later David A. Prevedel Curtis M. Johnson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/govdocs Part of the Earth Sciences Commons, and the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Prevedel, David A. and Johnson, Curtis M., "Beginnings of Range Management: Albert F. Potter, First Chief of Grazing, U.S. Forest Service, and Photographic Comparison of his 1902 Forest Reserve Survey in Utah with Conditions 100 Year Later" (2005). All U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository). Paper 70. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/govdocs/70 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository) at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository) by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. United States Department of Beginnings of Range Agriculture Management: Forest Service Intermountain Albert F. Potter, First Chief of Region Grazing, U.S. Forest Service, and Ogden, Utah R4-VM 2005-01 a Photographic Comparison of July 2005 his 1902 Forest Reserve Survey in Utah with Conditions 100 Years Later David A. Prevedel Curtis M. Johnson Abstract The period from 1880 to 1900 is regarded as the period of “spoilation” of western rangelands.
    [Show full text]
  • The Circleville Massacre: a Brutal Incident in Utah's Black Hawk War
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive All Faculty Publications 1987 The irC cleville Massacre: A Brutal Incident in Utah's Black Hawk War Albert Winkler Brigham Young University - Provo, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub Part of the United States History Commons Original Publication Citation Winkler, A. (1987). The irC cleville Massacre: A brutal incident in Utah’s Black Hawk War. Utah Historical Quarterly, 55(1), 4-21. BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Winkler, Albert, "The irC cleville Massacre: A Brutal Incident in Utah's Black Hawk War" (1987). All Faculty Publications. 1843. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/1843 This Peer-Reviewed Article is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Black Hawk and a historic marker at Payson, Utah . USHS collections. The Circleville Massacre: A Brutal Incident in Utah's Black Hawk War BY ALBERT WINKLER IN APRIL 1866 THE WHITE SETTLERS OF Circleville annihilated a band of captive Paiute Indians, including helpless women and children. This incident of the Black Hawk War of 1865-68 was the largest massacre of Indians in Utah's history. The mass murder seemed necessary to those who were anxious about possibly continuing Indian hostilities. The whites of Circleville had suffered dearly in a previous Indian raid and Dr. Winkler is an archivist in the Harold B. Lee Library at Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah. The Circleville Massacre 5 wanted to prevent a similar tragedy.
    [Show full text]
  • South Sanpitch Company V. Daniel Pack, Margaret A. Gunterman, Action Title Company, T.P
    Brigham Young University Law School BYU Law Digital Commons Utah Supreme Court Briefs 1988 South Sanpitch Company v. Daniel Pack, Margaret A. Gunterman, Action Title Company, T.P. Family Partnership, Hoffbuher Redi* Mix Inc., Willard M. Tucker, Phyllis 0. Tucker, and D Land Title Company: Brief of Appellant Utah Supreme Court Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_sc1 Part of the Law Commons Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Supreme Court; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors. Tex R. Olson; Attorney for Respondent. Brent D. Young, Jerry L. Reynolds; Ivie and Young; Attorneys for Appellant. Recommended Citation Brief of Appellant, South Sanpitch Company v. Pack, No. 880025.00 (Utah Supreme Court, 1988). https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_sc1/1873 This Brief of Appellant is brought to you for free and open access by BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Utah Supreme Court Briefs by an authorized administrator of BYU Law Digital Commons. Policies regarding these Utah briefs are available at http://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/utah_court_briefs/policies.html. Please contact the Repository Manager at [email protected] with questions or feedback. BHIfcT JTAH )OCUMENT MO )OCKET NO. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH SOUTH SANPITCH COMPANY, Plaintiff^Appellant, vs. DANIEL PACK, MARGARET A. GUNTERMAN, ACTION TITLE COMPANY, Trustee, T.P. FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, HOFFBUHER REDI* MIX INC., WILLARD M. TUCKER, PHYLLIS 0. TUCKER, D LAND TITLE COMPANY, and all unknown persons who have or claim any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the subject property, Case No.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan for the Great Basin National Heritage Area Approved April 30, 2013
    Management Plan for the Great Basin National Heritage Area Approved April 30, 2013 Prepared by the Great Basin Heritage Area Partnership Baker, Nevada i ii Great Basin National Heritage Area Management Plan September 23, 2011 Plans prepared previously by several National Heritage Areas provided inspiration for the framework and format for the Great Basin National Heritage Area Management Plan. National Park Service staff and documents provided guidance. We gratefully acknowledge these contributions. This Management Plan was made possible through funding provided by the National Park Service, the State of Nevada, the State of Utah and the generosity of local citizens. 2011 Great Basin National Heritage Area Disclaimer Restriction of Liability The Great Basin Heritage Area Partnership (GBHAP) and the authors of this document have made every reasonable effort to insur e accuracy and objectivity in preparing this plan. However, based on limitations of time, funding and references available, the parties involved make no claims, promises or guarantees about the absolute accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of this document and expressly disclaim liability for errors and omissions in the contents of this plan. No warranty of any kind, implied, expressed or statutory, including but not limited to the warranties of non-infringement of third party rights, title, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, is given with respect to the contents of this document or its references. Reference in this document to any specific commercial products, processes, or services, or the use of any trade, firm or corporation name is for the inf ormation and convenience of the public, and does not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the GBHAP or the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 66, No. 61/Thursday, March 29, 2001/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 61 / Thursday, March 29, 2001 / Notices 17137 Roads and trails created by wheeled a complete analysis of reasonable and the merits of the alternatives discussed OHVs are proliferating on all national feasible strategies for providing (see Council of Environmental Quality forests in several regions. Agency recreation for OHV recreationists. Regulations for implementing the personnel and the public note new user The preliminary alternatives include: procedural provisions of the National created trails on many national forests ‘‘No Action’’ which would keep the Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR and roads almost every week. These existing forest plan direction on all five 1503.3). trails arise from repetitive use of areas forests. Another alternative would In addition, Federal court decisions strictly prohibit all cross-country travel. with fragile soils. have established that reviewers of draft National forests in Arizona are Under this alternative only officially environmental impact statements must experiencing noticeable impacts. sanctioned government created roads structure their participation in the Communities adjacent to national and trails would be available for OHV environmental review of the proposal so forests have become focal points for a use. These roads would be a portion of that it is meaningful and alerts an large amount of unapproved roads and roads within national forests that are not agency to the reviewers; position and trails created by OHV users. These trails state, county or city highways or roads. contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear lack engineering and environmental A pair of alternatives would close Power Corp. v. NRDC 435 US 519, 553 elements of design and many forests to cross country travel with (1978).
    [Show full text]
  • Suitability of Brush Lands in the Inter-Mountain Region for The
    28 2 5 2 5 :; 1111/ . 11111 . 1.0 :; /////2.8 11111 . W IIIII~ 2.2 I~ ~F2 I:.l I:.l ~ I~ ~ I~~ w w ~ ~ I~ l- S~ I.. • 1U1.1.L.:. I.. " 1.1 1.1 toil.:, .... - - I 111111.25 111111.4 '"" 1.6 111111.25 111111.4 1111,1.6 MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS·l9&l·A NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANOARDS·l90J A - ~ ~====~.~~=~~~======'T:l!CI!NlCAL-BUI.L1!TIN No. 256 :~. AUGUST, 1931 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE WASHINGTON, D. C. SUITABILITY OF BRUSH LANDS IN THE INTER­ ··MOUNTAIN REGION FOR THE GROWTH OF NATURAL OR PLANTED WESTERN YELLOW PINE FORESTS By F. S. BAlQlR, formerly Forest JjJ:caminer. !ntermountai?b Region, and CLAJIto ENCE F. KOBBTIAN, formerly Senior SiLVicuzt1trist, .t1ppaUrohian Forest JjJrcperi­ ?nent Station, .Forest Service CONTE.."lTS Page Page Introdnction ____________________ _ 1 Results of plantlngs-Continned. NatU1'1l,1 range and occurrence of Conclusionstations___________________ from study of plan­ _ wes~ern yellow 9Ine____________ 8 48 Temperature, moisture, and Boll in Native vegetation ILB an tndication of .brnshthe western lands __________________yellow pine type and_ the suitability of planting sites__ 49 6 Failure of successional stage IlB ·Temperature-____________~__ _ an .1ndicator______________ Moisture___________________ _ 6 51 SoiL_______________________ _ 9 Indicator signlficance of brusb­ 18 land sbrubs based on root A specific test of the influence de\"elollment ______________ _ 54 of moisture and sol1_______ _ 25 Leaf characters as an indication :RemIts of plantlngs______________ 28 of Boll moisture____________ 68 Experimental plantations______ 28 Summary and conclusions ________ _ '17 More extensive plantations ___ _ 47 Literature •cited _________________ _ 80 INTRODUCTION The considerable areas ~\Upporting brush vegetation or various types that a re found throughout the mountainou'l portions of northern Utah, eastern Idaho, and western WYQming, on sites that would normally be expected to support western yellow pine forests, present to the forester.
    [Show full text]