DOCSLIB.ORG

Forest Service Administrative Sites in Region 4, 1891-1960

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Forest Service Administrative Sites in Region 4, 1891-1960 United States Department of Agriculture WITHIN A DAY'S RIDE Forest Service Intermountain Forest Service Region Administrative Sites in June 2004 Region 4, 1891-1960 A Contextual and Architectural History Cover: Top left: New Peck Mountain Lookout, Payette National Forest. Top right: Great Basin Experiment Station, Manti-LaSal National Forest, 1924. Bottom: South Fork Ranger Station, Bridger-Teton National Forest, 1918. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audio tape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. WITHIN A DAY'S RIDE Forest Service Administrative Sites in Region 4, 1891-1960 A Contextual and Architectural History By Richa Wilson Regional Architectural Historian USDA Forest Service Intermountain Region Facilities Group 324 25th Street Ogden, UT 84401 801-625-5704 [email protected] Acronyms AEC Atomic Energy Commission APW Accelerated Public Works AWS Aircraft Warning Service AS Administrative Site BLM Bureau of Land Management CCC Civilian Conservation Corps CO Conscientious Objector CPS Civilian Public Service DG Division of Grazing (now the Bureau of Land Management) DOI United States Department of the Interior DR District Ranger ECW Emergency Conservation Work ERA Emergency Relief Act FY Fiscal Year GLO General Land Office GS Guard Station NEPA National Environmental Protection Act NHPA National Historic Preservation Act NF National Forest NPS National Park Service NRHP National Register of Historic Places RO Regional Office (headquarters of a Forest Service region) RD Ranger District RMRS Rocky Mountain Research Station RS Ranger Station SCS Soil Conservation Service SO Supervisor’s Office (headquarters of a National Forest) USDA United States Department of Agriculture USFS United States Forest Service USGS United States Geological Survey USMC United States Marine Corps WO Washington Office WPA Works Progress Administration Table of Contents INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT DEFINITION .............................................................................................1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE .................................................................................................................................................1 FORMAT ..........................................................................................................................................................................1 FOREST SERVICE ORGANIZATION AND NOMENCLATURE...........................................................................2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................................................2 SPATIAL BOUNDARIES...............................................................................................................................................3 TEMPORAL BOUNDARIES .........................................................................................................................................3 Part One: Statement of Historic Context - General CHAPTER ONE: 1891-1904, THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR ERA..................................................... 7 FOREST SERVICE OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................................7 HISTORICAL SETTING.................................................................................................................................................8 THE FIRST FOREST RESERVES.................................................................................................................................8 ADMINISTRATION........................................................................................................................................................9 FIRE MANAGEMENT .................................................................................................................................................10 CHAPTER TWO: 1905-1932, THE PINCHOT AND PROGRESSIVE ERAS ............................................ 12 FOREST SERVICE OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................12 HISTORICAL SETTING...............................................................................................................................................13 NATIONAL FOREST CREATIONS & ADJUSTMENTS........................................................................................14 ADMINISTRATION......................................................................................................................................................17 ORGANIZATION........................................................................................................................................................17 FOREST OFFICERS..................................................................................................................................................18 A Professional and Trained Force..........................................................................................................................18 Forest Rangers ........................................................................................................................................................19 Women in the Forest Service.................................................................................................................................22 FIRE MANAGEMENT .................................................................................................................................................22 NURSERIES ...................................................................................................................................................................23 EXPERIMENT STATIONS..........................................................................................................................................24 SNOW SURVEYING ....................................................................................................................................................25 CHAPTER THREE: 1933-1942, THE NEW DEAL ERA.............................................................................. 27 HISTORICAL SETTING...............................................................................................................................................27 CHANGES TO THE FORESTS ...................................................................................................................................27 ADMINISTRATION......................................................................................................................................................28 THE DEPRESSION AND RELIEF PROGRAMS......................................................................................................29 ADMINISTRATION OF THE CCC...........................................................................................................................29 ENROLLMENT...........................................................................................................................................................30 THE CAMPS ...............................................................................................................................................................31 THE CCC AND THE FOREST SERVICE ................................................................................................................32 FINAL YEARS OF THE CCC....................................................................................................................................33 THE WORKS PROGRESS ADMINISTRATION ......................................................................................................34 FIRE MANAGEMENT .................................................................................................................................................34 NURSERIES ...................................................................................................................................................................35 EXPERIMENT STATIONS..........................................................................................................................................35 SNOW SURVEYING ....................................................................................................................................................36 CHAPTER FOUR: 1942-1946, THE WORLD WAR II ERA ........................................................................ 37 HISTORICAL SETTING...............................................................................................................................................37 ADMINISTRATION AND CHANGES TO THE FORESTS ................................................................................... 37 FIRE MANAGEMENT................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IN 1850 a Group of Entrepreneurs Put a Log Boom Into Operation
    Transition in the Woods: J^og Drivers, Raftsmen, and the 8mergence of \3XCodern J^umbering in ^Pennsylvania N 1850 a group of entrepreneurs put a log boom into operation on the West Branch of the Susquehanna River near Williams- I port. The boom heralded a major transformation in the utiliza- tion of Pennsylvania's forests, a transformation that within two decades was to make Williamsport the leading center of lumber production in the world.1 However, the change did not take place without friction. The Susquehanna Boom and operations associated with it threatened pre-existing patterns of forest exploitation and those who depended on them. Tension mounted, finally erupting in open battle in the spring of 1857. In the end, the champions of the modern industry made possible by the boom won out. With their victory the pre-industrial phase of lumbering came to an effective end in Pennsylvania. The mid-nineteenth century was a pivotal period in the history of the American lumber industry. Previously, lumber and other forest products had been turned out primarily by small-scale, localized operations with limited capital and relatively simple technology. Often forest operations were mere adjuncts of agriculture. To be 1 James Elliott Defebaugh, History of the Lumber Industry of America (Chicago, 1906-1907), II, 591-607; George S. Banger, History of the Susquehanna Boom Co. from 1846 to 1876 (Williamsport, 1876), 1-2; James C. Humes, "The Susquehanna Boom: A History of Logging and Rafting on the West Branch of the Susquehanna River," Now and Then, XIV (1962), 4—14; John F.
    [Show full text]
  • Off-Road Vehicle Plan
    United States Department of Agriculture Final Environmental Assessment Forest Service Tusayan Ranger District Travel Management Project April 2009 Southwestern Region Tusayan Ranger District Kaibab National Forest Coconino County, Arizona Information Contact: Charlotte Minor, IDT Leader Kaibab National Forest 800 S. Sixth Street, Williams, AZ 86046 928-635-8271 or fax: 928-635-8208 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternate means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Printed on recycled paper Chapter 1 5 Document Structure 5 Introduction 5 Background 8 Purpose and Need 10 Existing Condition 10 Desired Condition 12 Proposed Action 13 Decision Framework 15 Issues 15 Chapter 2 - Alternatives 17 Alternatives Analyzed
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 Coronado National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 Coronado National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Gypsy Moth Management in the - Vegetation management Completed Actual: 11/28/2012 01/2013 Susan Ellsworth United States: A Cooperative (other than forest products) 775-355-5313 Approach [email protected]. EIS us *UPDATED* Description: The USDA Forest Service and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service are analyzing a range of strategies for controlling gypsy moth damage to forests and trees in the United States. Web Link: http://www.na.fs.fed.us/wv/eis/ Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Nationwide. Locatable Mining Rule - 36 CFR - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2021 12/2021 Sarah Shoemaker 228, subpart A. Orders NOI in Federal Register 907-586-7886 EIS 09/13/2018 [email protected] d.us *UPDATED* Est. DEIS NOA in Federal Register 03/2021 Description: The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposes revisions to its regulations at 36 CFR 228, Subpart A governing locatable minerals operations on National Forest System lands.A draft EIS & proposed rule should be available for review/comment in late 2020 Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57214 Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. These regulations apply to all NFS lands open to mineral entry under the US mining laws.
    [Show full text]
  • This Was Logging Free
    FREE THIS WAS LOGGING PDF Ralph W. Andrews | 157 pages | 01 Jul 2007 | Schiffer Publishing Ltd | 9780887400353 | English | Atglen, United States Logging | Definition of Logging at For diagnostic purposes, Microsoft Outlook for Windows contains an option that turns on logging for certain Outlook features. These logs can be helpful for support staff who are troubleshooting problems. Turn logging on or off. What information does logging record? Log file locations. Administrator information. For OutlookOutlookand Outlook Under Otherselect or clear the Enable troubleshooting logging requires restarting Outlook check box. This Was Logging Outlook On the Other tab, select Advanced Options. Select or clear the Enable logging troubleshooting check box. After you restart Outlook, if mail logging is turned on, Logging Enabled appears in the Outlook title bar. Top of Page. The logging option logs information about the following features:. Calendar transactions that are generated by Outlook features, by user actions, by the object model, or by the MAPI Calendar Table, including:. The main purpose of the calendar logging feature is to quickly identify situations where, for example, meetings are inexplicably deleted from a calendar folder. Most log files are in plain text. Contact Microsoft Support for more information about calendar log files. The log files are stored in subfolders of the Temp folder. By default, the Local Settings and AppData folders are hidden. To display hidden folders in Windows, do the following:. To locate Folder Optionsin the search box at the top of window, type Folder Options. This Was Logging the View tab, under Advanced This Was Loggingunder Files and Foldersunder Hidden files and folders This Was Logging, select Show hidden files, folders, and drives.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagram Illustrating Presidential Proclamation
    DIAGRAM ILLUSTRATING PRESIDENTIAL PROCLAMATION Monitor National Forest, Nevada: Diagram forming a part of Proclamation dated April 15, 1907. Forest Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. 1907. Scale, ca. 1:316,880. No geographic coordinates. Public land (Township & Range) grid. Black & white. 51 x 24 cm., folded to 34 x 21 cm. Relief shown by hachures. Shows national forest boundaries, roads, ranches, and streams. Indicates location of the 39th parallel and in lower margin, “117º West from Washington.” Includes 5 blank legend boxes. “Mt. Diablo Meridian.” Holdings: LC; NA U.S. FOREST SERVICE FOLIO See Forest Atlas of the National Forests of the United States: Toiyabe Folio. (1909, sheets, 5, 10, 11, 17, 18, 23, 24, 26, 27 & 28) below for coverage of the Monitor National Forest in folio format. MONTICELLO FOREST RESERVE & NATIONAL FOREST, UTAH 1907-1908 The Monticello National Forest combined with the La Sal National Forest to establish the La Salle National Forest in 1908. The Monticello National Forest was named for the nearby town (Van Cott, page 256). Now the area forms the Monticello Section, LaSal Division of the Manti-LaSal National Forest. Under the Utah Wilderness Act of 1984, the 47,116 acre Dark Canyon Wilderness was established on the former Monticello National Forest. Moab, Utah served as the administrative headquarters of the Monticello, the same headquarters as the La Sal National Forest. It now forms the La Sal Division – Monticello of the Manti-LaSal National Forest. ADMINISTRATIVE HISTORY 1) 1907, February 6 *Proclamation, 34 Stat. 3272 Established Forest Reserve on 214,270 gross acres. 2) 1907, December 12 *Proclamation 783, 35 Stat.
    [Show full text]
  • FALCON V, LLC, Et Al.,1 DEBTORS. CASE NO. 19-10547 CHAPT
    Case 19-10547 Doc 103 Filed 05/21/19 Entered 05/21/19 08:56:32 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: CASE NO. 19-10547 FALCON V, L.L.C., et al.,1 CHAPTER 11 DEBTORS. (JOINTLY ADMINISTERED) ORDER APPROVING FALCON V, L.L.C.'S ACQUISITION OF ANADARKO E&P ONSHORE LLC’S INTEREST IN CERTAIN OIL, GAS AND MINERAL INTERESTS Considering the motion of the debtors-in-possession, Falcon V, L.L.C., (“Falcon”) for an order authorizing Falcon’s acquisition of the interest of Anadarko E&P Onshore LLC (“Anadarko”) in certain oil, gas and mineral leases (P-13), the evidence admitted and argument of counsel at a May 14, 2019 hearing, the record of the case and applicable law, IT IS ORDERED that the Debtors are authorized to take all actions necessary to consummate the March 1, 2019 Partial Assignment of Oil, Gas and Mineral Leases (the “Assignment”) by which Anadarko agreed to assign its right, title and interest in and to certain oil, gas and mineral leases in the Port Hudson Field, including the Letter Agreement between Falcon and Anadarko attached to this order as Exhibit 1. IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED that notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this order, the relief granted in this order and any payment to be made hereunder shall be subject to the terms of this court's orders authorizing debtor-in-possession financing and/or granting the use of cash collateral in these chapter 11 cases (including with respect to any budgets governing or related to such use), and the terms of such financing and/or cash collateral orders shall control if 1 The Debtors and the last four digits of their respective taxpayer identification numbers are Falcon V, L.L.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Lumber Industry
    From: The Wisconsin River: An Odyssey Through Time and Space by Richard D. Durbin, p. 20-22. The Lumber Industry Logging in the nineteenth century meant eastern white pine. Called Wisconsin's "Empire in Pine," this magnificent tree ranged from Vilas County, where it was the predominate forest species, south to isolated stands in Dane County It has been estimated that the original stands in the Wisconsin River valley totaled about thirty billion board feet, nearly a quarter of that in the entire state. The three hundred- to four hundred year- old trees ranged up to 200 feet tall, although most averaged 120-160 feet, and their diameter at the butt ran from 4 to 7 feet. Usually, five to six clear logs could be cut from each tree. No other species was so highly prized. It was strong, sawed and worked easily and unlike most other northern species, its logs floated. Only after most of the pine had been cut and railroad transport established were hemlock, sugar maple, basswood and oaks taken. In 1852, a Wisconsin representative describing the Pinery to Congress said, "there are indeterminate forests of pine, sufficient to supply all the wants of the citizens for all time to come." But a scant fifty years later, almost all of it was gone and large-scale logging had virtually disappeared from the Wisconsin's basin. The end came almost before anyone realized it. Wisconsin went from being the number one lumber producer in the country at the turn of the century to number eight within the decade.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of the TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST a Compilation
    HISTORY OF THE TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST A Compilation Posting the Toiyabe National Forest Boundary, 1924 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Chronology ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Bridgeport and Carson Ranger District Centennial .................................................................... 126 Forest Histories ........................................................................................................................... 127 Toiyabe National Reserve: March 1, 1907 to Present ............................................................ 127 Toquima National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ....................................................... 128 Monitor National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ........................................................ 128 Vegas National Forest: December 12, 1907 – July 2, 1908 .................................................... 128 Mount Charleston Forest Reserve: November 5, 1906 – July 2, 1908 ................................... 128 Moapa National Forest: July 2, 1908 – 1915 .......................................................................... 128 Nevada National Forest: February 10, 1909 – August 9, 1957 .............................................. 128 Ruby Mountain Forest Reserve: March 3, 1908 – June 19, 1916 ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: a Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators
    USDA United States Department of Agriculture Research Natural Areas on Forest Service National Forest System Lands Rocky Mountain Research Station in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, General Technical Report RMRS-CTR-69 Utah, and Western Wyoming: February 2001 A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and E'ducators Angela G. Evenden Melinda Moeur J. Stephen Shelly Shannon F. Kimball Charles A. Wellner Abstract Evenden, Angela G.; Moeur, Melinda; Shelly, J. Stephen; Kimball, Shannon F.; Wellner, Charles A. 2001. Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-69. Ogden, UT: U.S. Departmentof Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 84 p. This guidebook is intended to familiarize land resource managers, scientists, educators, and others with Research Natural Areas (RNAs) managed by the USDA Forest Service in the Northern Rocky Mountains and lntermountain West. This guidebook facilitates broader recognitionand use of these valuable natural areas by describing the RNA network, past and current research and monitoring, management, and how to use RNAs. About The Authors Angela G. Evenden is biological inventory and monitoring project leader with the National Park Service -NorthernColorado Plateau Network in Moab, UT. She was formerly the Natural Areas Program Manager for the Rocky Mountain Research Station, Northern Region and lntermountain Region of the USDA Forest Service. Melinda Moeur is Research Forester with the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain ResearchStation in Moscow, ID, and one of four Research Natural Areas Coordinators from the Rocky Mountain Research Station. J. Stephen Shelly is Regional Botanist and Research Natural Areas Coordinator with the USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Headquarters Office in Missoula, MT.
    [Show full text]
  • THE M1ssouf\1 MINER·
    Missouri University of Science and Technology Scholars' Mine The Missouri Miner Newspaper Special Collections 11 Jan 1918 The Missouri Miner, January 11, 1918 Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/missouri_miner These newspapers reflect the attitudes, perspectives, and beliefs of different times. Neither the library nor the university endorses the views expressed in these collections, some of which contain images and language which may be offensive to some readers. Recommended Citation "The Missouri Miner, January 11, 1918" (1918). The Missouri Miner Newspaper. 108. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/missouri_miner/108 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars' Mine. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Missouri Miner Newspaper by an authorized administrator of Scholars' Mine. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE M1SSOUf\1 MINER· Missouri School of Mines and Metallurgy, Rolla. Mo. Vol. 4, No. 17. Friday, January 11, 1918. Price 5 Cents. 14 WAR AIMS OF U. S. McConnell-Metzgar. The Lass of Limerick Town. DEFINED BY WILSON. Rolla people were surprised to The Junior Class will offer to hear of Coach McConnell's mar­ the Rolla people a cleverly writ­ Approving Lloyd George's De­ riage, as he had always proved ten show by the name of "The claration, President Outlines himself girl-shy here with Rol­ Lass of Limerick Town," some time in the early part of Febru­ Demands. la's 400, but now everyone can readily see t here was a reason.
    [Show full text]
  • North Kaibab Ranger District Travel Management Project Environmental Assessment
    Environmental Assessment United States Department of Agriculture North Kaibab Ranger District Forest Service Travel Management Project Southwestern Region September 2012 Kaibab National Forest Coconino and Mohave Counties, Arizona Information Contact: Wade Christy / Recreation & Lands Kaibab National Forest - NKRD Mail: P.O.Box 248 / 430 S. Main St. Fredonia, AZ 86022 Phone: 928-643-8135 E-mail: [email protected] It is the mission of the USDA Forest Service to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the Nation’s forests and grasslands to meet the needs of present and future generations. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Printed on recycled paper – September
    [Show full text]
  • Manti-La Sal Ranger Stations
    United States Department of Agriculture Commodious Cabins & Forest Service Intermountain Region Handsome Structures MANTI-LA SAL NATIONAL FOREST MAY 2013 Administrative Facilities of the Manti-La Sal National Forest, 1905-1962 Historic Context Statement & Evaluations, Forest Service Report No. ML-13-1437 Cover: Ranger David Williams with his family at the Clay Springs Ranger Station, 1908 “A commodious cabin is being built, and other improvements which will be made will make the station a very convenient one.” – “Building New Ranger Station on Wilson Mesa,” Times Independent, November 18, 1920, 1 The new Moab building “is a handsome structure and affords ample space for the supervisor’s office. eventually the forest headquarters will be one of the most attractive locations in town.” – “Forest Service In New Building,” Times Independent, September 12, 1940, 1. Commodious Cabins and Handsome Structures Administrative Facilities of the Manti-La Sal National Forest, 1905-1962 Historic Context Statement and Evaluations Forest Service Report No. ML-13-1437 By Richa Wilson Regional Architectural Historian USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region 324 25th Street Ogden, UT 84401 May 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................................................................. V CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................... 1 SPATIAL BOUNDARIES ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]