DOCSLIB.ORG

North Kaibab Ranger District Travel Management Project Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North Kaibab Ranger District Travel Management Project Environmental Assessment Environmental Assessment United States Department of Agriculture North Kaibab Ranger District Forest Service Travel Management Project Southwestern Region September 2012 Kaibab National Forest Coconino and Mohave Counties, Arizona Information Contact: Wade Christy / Recreation & Lands Kaibab National Forest - NKRD Mail: P.O.Box 248 / 430 S. Main St. Fredonia, AZ 86022 Phone: 928-643-8135 E-mail: [email protected] It is the mission of the USDA Forest Service to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the Nation’s forests and grasslands to meet the needs of present and future generations. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Printed on recycled paper – September 2012 Environmental Assessment North Kaibab Ranger District Travel Management Project Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................. iii Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Document Structure .................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1 – Purpose and Need / Proposed Action ................................................................................... 2 Background ............................................................................................................................................... 2 Project Area Description ........................................................................................................................... 3 Purpose and Need for Action .................................................................................................................... 6 Existing and Desired Conditions ............................................................................................................... 6 Proposed Action ...................................................................................................................................... 11 Kaibab Forest Plan Direction .................................................................................................................. 11 Decision Framework ............................................................................................................................... 12 Public Involvement ................................................................................................................................. 12 Issues ....................................................................................................................................................... 13 Chapter 2 – Description of Alternatives ................................................................................................. 15 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 15 Process Used to Develop the Alternatives .............................................................................................. 15 Alternatives Analyzed in Detail .............................................................................................................. 15 Comparison of Alternatives Analyzed in Detail ..................................................................................... 18 Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................................................... 23 Monitoring .............................................................................................................................................. 23 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Study ................................................................ 24 Chapter 3 – Environmental Effects ......................................................................................................... 26 Recreation and Scenic Resources............................................................................................................ 26 Soils, Watershed, and Air Quality........................................................................................................... 45 Rare and Sensitive Plant Species ............................................................................................................ 63 Non-Native and Invasive Species ........................................................................................................... 69 Wildlife ................................................................................................................................................... 72 Cultural Resources .................................................................................................................................. 86 Range Management............................................................................................................................... 100 Fire and Fuels Management .................................................................................................................. 103 Vegetation Management ....................................................................................................................... 104 Lands and Minerals ............................................................................................................................... 105 Social and Economic Environment ....................................................................................................... 106 Transportation ....................................................................................................................................... 110 Climate Change ..................................................................................................................................... 113 Other Disclosures .................................................................................................................................. 114 Chapter 4 – Consultation and Coordination ........................................................................................ 115 Tribal Consultation Summary ............................................................................................................... 116 Glossary of Terms ................................................................................................................................... 120 i Environmental Assessment North Kaibab Ranger District Travel Management Project References ................................................................................................................................................ 128 Appendix 1 – Proposed Forest Plan Amendment ................................................................................ 133 Appendix 2 – Projects Considered in Cumulative Effects .................................................................. 134 Appendix 3 – Maps ................................................................................................................................. 137 Appendix 4 – Consideration of / Response to Comments .................................................................... 142 List of Tables Table 1. Existing Road System Mileage by Maintenance Level .................................................................. 7 Table 2. Summarized total big game harvests from the NKRD in 2009 and the estimated number of harvests using motorized means of retrieving game ................................................................................... 10 Table 3. Roads with proposed dispersed camping corridors ...................................................................... 16 Table 4. Comparison of Alternatives – Key Design Features ..................................................................... 18 Table 5. Comparison of Alternatives - Key Issues Addressed .................................................................... 19 Table 6. Comparison of Alternatives - Summary of Effects on Resources ................................................ 20 Table 7. Kaibab National Forest visitation in 2005. ................................................................................... 27 Table 8. Top five recreation activities on the Kaibab National Forest. ...................................................... 27 Table 9. Percent of National Forest visits indicating use of special
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Off-Road Vehicle Plan
    United States Department of Agriculture Final Environmental Assessment Forest Service Tusayan Ranger District Travel Management Project April 2009 Southwestern Region Tusayan Ranger District Kaibab National Forest Coconino County, Arizona Information Contact: Charlotte Minor, IDT Leader Kaibab National Forest 800 S. Sixth Street, Williams, AZ 86046 928-635-8271 or fax: 928-635-8208 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternate means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Printed on recycled paper Chapter 1 5 Document Structure 5 Introduction 5 Background 8 Purpose and Need 10 Existing Condition 10 Desired Condition 12 Proposed Action 13 Decision Framework 15 Issues 15 Chapter 2 - Alternatives 17 Alternatives Analyzed
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 Coronado National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 Coronado National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Gypsy Moth Management in the - Vegetation management Completed Actual: 11/28/2012 01/2013 Susan Ellsworth United States: A Cooperative (other than forest products) 775-355-5313 Approach [email protected]. EIS us *UPDATED* Description: The USDA Forest Service and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service are analyzing a range of strategies for controlling gypsy moth damage to forests and trees in the United States. Web Link: http://www.na.fs.fed.us/wv/eis/ Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Nationwide. Locatable Mining Rule - 36 CFR - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2021 12/2021 Sarah Shoemaker 228, subpart A. Orders NOI in Federal Register 907-586-7886 EIS 09/13/2018 [email protected] d.us *UPDATED* Est. DEIS NOA in Federal Register 03/2021 Description: The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposes revisions to its regulations at 36 CFR 228, Subpart A governing locatable minerals operations on National Forest System lands.A draft EIS & proposed rule should be available for review/comment in late 2020 Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57214 Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. These regulations apply to all NFS lands open to mineral entry under the US mining laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Canyon National Park U.S
    National Park Service Grand Canyon National Park U.S. Department of the Interior The official newspaper North Rim 2015 Season The Guide North Rim Information and Maps Roosevelt Point, named for President Theodore Roosevelt who in 1908, declared Grand Canyon a national monument. Grand Canyon was later established as a national park in 1919 by President Woodrow Wilson. Welcome to Grand Canyon S ITTING ATOP THE K AIBAB a meadow, a mother turkey leading her thunderstorms, comes and goes all too flies from the South Rim, the North Plateau, 8,000 to 9,000 feet (2,400– young across the road, or a mountain quickly, only to give way to the colors Rim offers a very different visitor 2,750 m) above sea level with lush lion slinking off into the cover of the of fall. With the yellows and oranges of experience. Solitude, awe-inspiring green meadows surrounded by a mixed forest. Visitors in the spring may see quaking aspen and the reds of Rocky views, a slower pace, and the feeling of conifer forest sprinkled with white- remnants of winter in disappearing Mountain maple, the forest seems to going back in time are only a few of the barked aspen, the North Rim is an oasis snowdrifts or temporary mountain glow. Crispness in the air warns of winter many attributes the North Rim has in the desert. Here you may observe lakes of melted snow. The summer, snowstorms soon to come. Although to offer. Discover the uniqueness of deer feeding, a coyote chasing mice in with colorful wildflowers and intense only 10 miles (16 km) as the raven Grand Canyon’s North Rim.
    [Show full text]
  • 4310-32-P Department of The
    4310-32-P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management Notice of Proposed Withdrawal and Opportunity for Public Meeting; Arizona AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Secretary of the Interior proposes to withdraw approximately 633,547 acres of public lands and 360,002 acres of National Forest System lands for up to 20 years from location and entry under the Mining Law of 1872, 30 U.S.C. §§ 22 et seq., on behalf of the Bureau of Land Management and the United States Forest Service. The purpose of the withdrawal, if determined to be appropriate, would be to protect the Grand Canyon watershed from adverse effects of locatable hardrock mineral exploration and mining. This notice segregates the lands from location and entry under the 1872 Mining Law for up to 2 years to allow time for various studies and analyses, including appropriate National Environmental Policy Act analysis. These actions will support a final decision on whether or not to proceed with a withdrawal. The lands will remain open to the mineral leasing, geothermal leasing, mineral materials, and public land laws. DATES: Comments and requests for a public meeting must be received by (insert date 90 days after date of publication in the FEDERAL REGISTER). ADDRESSES: Comments and meeting requests should be sent to the District Manager, Bureau of Land Management, Arizona Strip District Office, 345 East Riverside Drive, St. George, Utah 84790-9000, or Forest Supervisor, Forest Service, Kaibab National Forest, 800 South Sixth St., Williams, Arizona 86046. 2 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Florence, District Manager, BLM Arizona Strip District, 435-688-3200, or Michael Williams, Forest Supervisor, Kaibab National Forest, 928-635-8200.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Newsletter of the Pacific Northwest Forest Service Retirees—Summer 2015 President’S Message—Jim Rice
    OldSmokeys Newsletter Newsletter of the Pacific Northwest Forest Service Retirees—Summer 2015 President’s Message—Jim Rice I had a great career with the U.S. Forest Service, and volunteering for the OldSmokeys now is a opportunity for me to give back a little to the folks and the organization that made my career such a great experience. This past year as President-elect, I gained an understanding about how the organization gets things done and the great leadership we have in place. It has been awesome to work with Linda Goodman and Al Matecko and the dedicated board of directors and various committee members. I am also excited that Ron Boehm has joined us in his new President-elect role. I am looking forward to the year ahead. This is an incredible retiree organization. In 2015, through our Elmer Moyer Memorial Emergency Fund, we were able to send checks to two Forest Service employees and a volunteer of the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest who had lost their homes and all their possessions in a wildfire. We also approved four grants for a little over $8,900. Over the last ten years our organization has donated more than $75,000. This money has come from reunion profits, book sales, investments, and generous donations from our membership. All of this has been given to “non-profits” for projects important to our membership. Last, and most importantly, now is the time to mark your calendars for the Summer Picnic in the Woods. It will be held on August 14 at the Wildwood Recreation Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Order Number 03-07-20-09 the Restricted Area Consists of All
    Order Number 03-07-20-09 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE KAIBAB NATIONAL FOREST NORTH KAIBAB RANGER DISTRICT TEMPORARY AREA CLOSURE DUE TO THE MANGUM FIRE (For Public Safety) PROHIBITIONS Pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 551 and 36 C.F.R. § 261.50(a), the following acts are prohibited within the area described in this Order (the “Restricted Area”), and as depicted on the attached map, hereby incorporated into this order as Exhibit A, all within the within the boundaries of the North Kaibab Ranger District of the Kaibab National Forest, Coconino County, Arizona (AZ): 1. Going into or being upon the Restricted Area. 36 C.F.R. § 261.53(e) EXEMPTIONS Pursuant to 36 C.F.R. § 261.50(e), the following persons are exempt from this Order: 1. Persons with a written Forest Service authorization specifically exempting them from the effect of this Order. 2. Any Federal, State, or local officer or administrative personnel, or member of an organized rescue or fire fighting force in the performance of an official duty. RESTRICTED AREA The Restricted Area consists of all National Forest System lands within the boundary beginning at the Kaibab National Forest, North Kaibab Ranger District’s eastern boundary and Highway (HWY) 89A, near milepost 566, between Sections 34 and 35 in Township 39 N Range 3 E, and follows the forest boundary north and west for approximately 25 miles, then south and west for approximately six miles to where the forest boundary intersects with HWY 89A between mileposts 593 and 594, then crossing HWY 89A and following
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Appraisal of the Kaibab National Forest, Arizona MLA 5-92
    I I I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I MINERAL APPRAISAL OF THE KAIBAB NATIONAL FOREST, ARIZONA I I I I by David C. Scott I I MLA 5-92 I 1992 I I Intermountain Field Operations Center I Denver, Colorado I UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR I Manuel Lujan Jr., Secretary BUREAU OF MINES I T S ARY, Director I I, II PREFACE I A January 1987 Interagency Agreement between the Bureau of Mines, U.S. Geological Survey, and U.S. Forest Service describes I the purpose, authority, and program operation for the forest-wide studies. The program is intended to assist the Forest Service in incorporating mineral resource data in forest plans as specified by the National Forest Management Act (1976) and Title 36, Chapter 2, II Part 219, Code of Federal Regulations, and to augment the Bureau's mineral resource data base so that it can analyze and make available minerals information as required by the National I Materials and Minerals Policy, Research and Development Act (1980). This report is based on available data from literature and limited field investigations. I I I l I I I I I This open-file report summarizes the results of a Bureau of Mines wilderness study. The report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with the I Bureau of Mines editorial standards. This study was conducted by personnel from the Resource Evaluation Branch, Intermountain Field Operations Center, P.O Box ! 25086, Denver, CO 80225. I I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS I ABSTRACT .......................... 1 INTRODUCTION ................... 2 I Mining districts and history .............
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from Kanab Creek
    Lessons From Kanab Creek It is late May, and final exams have ended at Northern Arizona University. The van is crammed with sleepy college students heading from Flagstaff to the Grand Canyon’s North Rim. The high desert is blooming after a recent thunderstorm. Patches of orange Globemallow and yellow Primrose dot the landscape. Our destination is Kanab Creek Wilderness. My first trip, nine years ago, was as a student; now I am the instructor. We zip past the flowers while distant rusty cliffs float by. I thumbed through memories of my first Kanab Creek trip, practicing leadership skills while carrying heavy packs. The canyons were our classroom. My first impressions were of the convoluted drainages and towering red cliffs that were foreign to this boy from Philadelphia. Yet, somehow, it felt like a homecoming. The memories were comforting; my eyes closed and I fell a sleep. Ruts in the washboard road jar me awake. My eyes open. A new landscape spreads out before me: a maze of windswept walls, rocky knobs, potholes, and alcoves. The van stops and its doors swing open. We are at the top of Jump Up Canyon, our entry point into Kanab Creek, the largest drainage on the Grand Canyon’s north rim. Kanab Creek cuts a network of gorges hundreds and thousands of feet into the Kaibab Plateau. It is the largest and most beautiful office a person could work in. Now, I facilitate students on their own adventures in Kanab Creek. I make sure nobody gets injured, initiate discussion, assign grades, prevent students from burning their food, and patch up the predictable blisters.
    [Show full text]
  • State No. Description Size in Cm Date Location
    Maps State No. Description Size in cm Date Location National Forests in Alabama. Washington: ALABAMA AL-1 49x28 1989 Map Case US Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service. Bankhead National Forest (Bankhead and Alabama AL-2 66x59 1981 Map Case Blackwater Districts). Washington: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Side A : Coronado National Forest (Nogales A: 67x72 ARIZONA AZ-1 1984 Map Case Ranger District). Washington: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. B: 67x63 Side B : Coronado National Forest (Sierra Vista Ranger District). Side A : Coconino National Forest (North A:69x88 Arizona AZ-2 1976 Map Case Half). Washington: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. B:69x92 Side B : Coconino National Forest (South Half). Side A : Coronado National Forest (Sierra A:67x72 Arizona AZ-3 1976 Map Case Vista Ranger District. Washington: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. B:67x72 Side B : Coronado National Forest (Nogales Ranger District). Prescott National Forest. Washington: US Arizona AZ-4 28x28 1992 Map Case Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Kaibab National Forest (North Unit). Arizona AZ-5 68x97 1967 Map Case Washington: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Prescott National Forest- Granite Mountain Arizona AZ-6 67x48.5 1993 Map Case Wilderness. Washington: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Side A : Prescott National Forest (East Half). A:111x75 Arizona AZ-7 1993 Map Case Washington: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. B:111x75 Side B : Prescott National Forest (West Half). Arizona AZ-8 Superstition Wilderness: Tonto National 55.5x78.5 1994 Map Case Forest. Washington: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Arizona AZ-9 Kaibab National Forest, Gila and Salt River 80x96 1994 Map Case Meridian.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Wilderness Recommendation
    Final Wilderness Recommendation 2010 Update Grand Canyon National Park Arizona National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior NOTE: This document is a draft update to the park’s 1980 Final Wilderness Recommendation submitted to the Department of Interior in September 1980. The 1980 recommendation has never been forwarded to the president and Congress for legislative action. The 2010 draft update is to reconcile facts on the ground and incorporate modern mapping tools (Geographical Information Systems), but it does not alter the substance of the original recommendation. In 1993, the park also completed an update that served as a resource for the 2010 draft update. The official wilderness recommendation map remains the map #113-40, 047B, submitted to the Department of Interior in 1980. FINAL WILDERNESS RECOMMENDATION 2010 Update GRAND CANYON NATIONAL PARK ARIZONA THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE RECOMMENDS THAT WILDERNESS OF 1,143,918 ACRES WITHIN GRAND CANYON NATIONAL PARK, ARIZONA, AS DESCRIBED IN THIS DOCUMENT, BE DESIGNATED BY AN ACT OF CONGRESS. OF THIS TOTAL, 1,117,457 ACRES ARE RECOMMENDED FOR IMMEDIATE DESIGNATION, AND 26,461 ACRES ARE RECOMMENDED FOR DESIGNATION AS POTENTIAL WILDERNESS PENDING RESOLUTION OF BOUNDARY AND MOTORIZED RIVER ISSUES. 2 Table of Contents I. Requirement for Study 4 II. Wilderness Recommendation 4 III. Wilderness Summary 4 IV. Description of the Wilderness Units 5 Unit 1: Grand Wash Cliffs 5 Unit 2: Western Park 5 (a) Havasupai Traditional Use Lands 6 (b) Sanup Plateau 7 (c) Uinkaret Mountains 7 (d) Toroweap Valley 8 (e) Kanab Plateau 8 - Tuckup Point 8 - SB Point 8 (f) North Rim 8 (g) Esplanade 9 (h) Tonto Platform 9 (i) Inner Canyon 9 (j) South Rim (west of Hermits Rest) 9 (k) Recommended Potential wilderness 9 - Colorado River 9 - Curtis-Lee Tracts 9 (l) Non-wilderness 9 - Great Thumb 9 - North Rim Primitive Roads 10 - Kanab Plateau Primitive Roads 10 Unit 3: Eastern Park 10 (a) Potential Wilderness 11 - Private Lands 11 - Colorado River 12 (b) Non-wilderness: North Rim Paved Roads 12 Unit 4: The Navajo Indian Properties 12 VI.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaibab National Forest
    United States Department of Agriculture Kaibab National Forest Forest Service Southwestern Potential Wilderness Area Region September 2013 Evaluation Report The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover photo: Kanab Creek Wilderness Kaibab National Forest Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation Report Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Inventory of Potential Wilderness Areas .................................................................................................. 2 Evaluation of Potential Wilderness Areas ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kanab Creek Wilderness
    VICINITY MAP 112°43'30"W 350000 112°37'0"W 360000 112°30'30"W 370000 112°24'0"W 380000 112°17'30"W Roads Too Short To Be Seen Clearly On The Map Fredonia ¤£160 £89 Road Route Length Road Route Length Road Route Length Road Route Length Road Route Length Road Route Length Tusayan ¤ Kaibab Number Designation (Feet) Number Designation (Feet) Number Designation (Feet) Number Designation (Feet) Number Designation (Feet) Number Designation (Feet) National Forest Williams Flagstaff -W40 Prescott 180 ¤£89 -W17 ¤£ 10 Phoenix North Kaibab Ranger District -W -W8 Tucson -W10 -W19 N " 7 2 ' 3 INFORMATION SOURCES 5 ° 6 3 North Kaibab RD: (928) 643-7395 430 S Main St, Fredonia AZ 86022 36°53'27"N Kaibab Plateau VC: (928) 643-7298 Hwy 67 and 89A Jacob Lake, AZ 86022 Kaibab National Forest SO: (928) 635-8200 800 S 6th St Williams, AZ 86046 Grand Canyon NP: (928) 638-7888 (Visitor Info) Grand Canyon NP North Rim: (928) 638-7864 AZ-67 North Rim, AZ 86023 0 0 0 BLM AZ Strip Field Office: (435) 688-3200 0 8 4080000 345 E Riverside Dr St. George, UT 84790 0 4 BLM Kanab Field Office (435) 644-1272 669 S Hwy 89A Kanab, UT 84741 Arizona Game and Fish: (928) 774-5227 3500 S Lake Mary Rd Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Kane County Hospital: (435) 644-5811 355 Main St Kanab, UT 84741 Coconino County Sheriff: (928) 774-4523 911 E Sawmill Rd Flagstaff, AZ 86001 In the Event of Emergency Dial 911 PURPOSE AND CONTENTS OF THIS MAP The designations shown on this motor vehicle use map 7000 (MVUM) were made by the responsible official pursuant 637 to 36 CFR 212.51; are effective as of the date on the front 6 cover of this MVUM; and will remain in effect until 37 superseded by next year's MVUM.
    [Show full text]