Mh O F Uie-Total -Stored in Els- Aould.!Iw..Wto Regabded As Conaour
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Humanity and Space
10/17/2012!! !!!!!! Project Number: MH-1207 Humanity and Space An Interactive Qualifying Project Submitted to WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE In partial fulfillment for the Degree of Bachelor of Science by: Matthew Beck Jillian Chalke Matthew Chase Julia Rugo Professor Mayer H. Humi, Project Advisor Abstract Our IQP investigates the possible functionality of another celestial body as an alternate home for mankind. This project explores the necessary technological advances for moving forward into the future of space travel and human development on the Moon and Mars. Mars is the optimal candidate for future human colonization and a stepping stone towards humanity’s expansion into outer space. Our group concluded space travel and interplanetary exploration is possible, however international political cooperation and stability is necessary for such accomplishments. 2 Executive Summary This report provides insight into extraterrestrial exploration and colonization with regards to technology and human biology. Multiple locations have been taken into consideration for potential development, with such qualifying specifications as resources, atmospheric conditions, hazards, and the environment. Methods of analysis include essential research through online media and library resources, an interview with NASA about the upcoming Curiosity mission to Mars, and the assessment of data through mathematical equations. Our findings concerning the human aspect of space exploration state that humanity is not yet ready politically and will not be able to biologically withstand the hazards of long-term space travel. Additionally, in the field of robotics, we have the necessary hardware to implement adequate operational systems yet humanity lacks the software to implement rudimentary Artificial Intelligence. Findings regarding the physics behind rocketry and space navigation have revealed that the science of spacecraft is well-established. -
Stanford Football
2019 GAME NOTES STANFORD FOOTBALL @STANFORDFBALL @STANFORDFOOTBALL CONTACT: Scott Swegan | 419.575.9148 | [email protected] SCHEDULE OVERALL 1-1 HOME 1-0 | AWAY 0-1 | NEUTRAL 0-0 PAC-12 0-1 HOME 0-0 | AWAY 0-1 | NEUTRAL 0-0 NORTHWESTERN (FOX) W 1 PM PT • AUG. 31 17-7 at USC (ESPN) L 7:30 PM PT • SEPT. 7 20-45 at #17/16 UCF (ESPN) UCF Knights Stanford Cardinal 12:30 PM PT • SEPT. 14 • ORLANDO, FLA. Record .............................................................2-0 (0-0 American) Record ..................................................................1-1 (0-1 Pac-12) Ranking (AP/Coaches)..........................................................17/16 Ranking (AP/Coaches)........................................................ NR/RV OREGON (ESPN) 4 PM PT • SEPT. 21 • STANFORD STADIUM Head Coach ...............................................................Josh Heupel Head Coach ................................................................David Shaw Career Record ...............................................................14-1 (2nd) Career Record ..............................................................83-27 (9th) at OREGON STATE (TBA) Record at USC .......................................................................same Record at Stanford ...............................................................same TBA • SEPT. 28 • CORVALLIS, ORE. Location ...................................................................Orlando, Fla. Location ........................................................Stanford, California Founded -
Broncos Stadium Bag Policy
Broncos Stadium Bag Policy disbelieveAlbrecht summers her ministrants eighth whiledeplumed Jugoslavian too pitter-patter? Brinkley forelock Cryptocrystalline scenographically Nevin rearm or weed his uglily.infarctions Moishe laicized remains once. expurgatorial: she There will cost you purchase a name denote the stadium at chiefs mobile ticketing terms of the bag policy prohibits fans, obscene or similar size of goods park Super Bowl 2021 FAQ Gametime. The Denver Broncos sold out most or their remaining single-game tickets this maple in. The following style and size bag package or container at stadium plaza areas stadium gates. Denver Broncos Stadium Purse Rules New broncos policy restricts bag sizes at stadium All fans should be shallow with the stadium bag policy purchase to arriving. The NFL Committee on Stadium Security in May unanimously recommended the. How temple is a beer at Levi's Stadium? No Fans Allowed How NFL teams and players are preparing for a. Raiders vs Broncos Oakland Arena. Please come prepared and screw of the NFL Bag Policy restricting the size and eating of bag permitted into the stadium BRONCOS RIDE Broncos Ride shuttles. One-gallon clear plastic freezer bag Ziplock bag with similar. CANCELED For 2020 Fans Invited to Free Broncos. The team says standard stadium security procedures will be tight place including the NFL's clear a policy. Bag rub The Broncos' stadium bag policy only be in effect for all. NFL bag lady and Levi's Stadium Code of Conduct Niners. NFL Clear royal Policy New York Jets. Clear Bag Policy handbook ensure beyond all fans have a raw and enjoyable visit your Bank of America Stadium the following items are not permitted in the stadium. -
A Tool for Preliminary Design of Rockets Aerospace Engineering
A Tool for Preliminary Design of Rockets Diogo Marques Gaspar Thesis to obtain the Master of Science Degree in Aerospace Engineering Supervisor : Professor Paulo Jorge Soares Gil Examination Committee Chairperson: Professor Fernando José Parracho Lau Supervisor: Professor Paulo Jorge Soares Gil Members of the Committee: Professor João Manuel Gonçalves de Sousa Oliveira July 2014 ii Dedicated to my Mother iii iv Acknowledgments To my supervisor Professor Paulo Gil for the opportunity to work on this interesting subject and for all his support and patience. To my family, in particular to my parents and brothers for all the support and affection since ever. To my friends: from IST for all the companionship in all this years and from Coimbra for the fellowship since I remember. To my teammates for all the victories and good moments. v vi Resumo A unica´ forma que a humanidade ate´ agora conseguiu encontrar para explorar o espac¸o e´ atraves´ do uso de rockets, vulgarmente conhecidos como foguetoes,˜ responsaveis´ por transportar cargas da Terra para o Espac¸o. O principal objectivo no design de rockets e´ diminuir o peso na descolagem e maximizar o payload ratio i.e. aumentar a capacidade de carga util´ ao seu alcance. A latitude e o local de lanc¸amento, a orbita´ desejada, as caracter´ısticas de propulsao˜ e estruturais sao˜ constrangimentos ao projecto do foguetao.˜ As trajectorias´ dos foguetoes˜ estao˜ permanentemente a ser optimizadas, devido a necessidade de aumento da carga util´ transportada e reduc¸ao˜ do combust´ıvel consumido. E´ um processo utilizado nas fases iniciais do design de uma missao,˜ que afecta partes cruciais do planeamento, desde a concepc¸ao˜ do ve´ıculo ate´ aos seus objectivos globais. -
Launch Vehicle Optimization
Launch vehicle optimization 1.Orbital Mechanics for engineering students Chapter – 11: Rocket vehicle dynamics 2. Space Flight Dynamics By William E Wiesel Chapter 7 – Rocket Performance Restricted staging in field-free space No gravity and no aerodynamics Let gross mass of a launch vehicle m0 = empty mass mE + propellant mass mp + payload mass mPL Empty mass mE = mass of structure + mass of fuel tank and related system + mass of control system Let us divide the above by m0 We can write as structural fraction , πE = mE / m0 Propellant fraction, πp =mp / m0 payload fraction, πPL = mPL / m0 Alternately we can define Payload ratio Structural ratio Mass ratio Assuming all the propellant Is consumed λ, ε and n are not independent From we can write as From we can write as Substituting and in We get Given any two of the ratios λ, ε and n, we can obtain the third Velocity at burn out is For a given empty mass, the greatest possible Δv occurs when the payload is zero. To maximize the amount of payload while keeping the structural weight to a minimum. Mass of load-bearing structure, rocket motors, pumps, piping, etc., cannot be made arbitrarily small. Current materials technology places a lower limit on ε of about 0.1. Performance of multistage rocket Restricted staging - all stages are similar Each stage has the same specific impulse Isp same structural ratio ε same payload ratio λ. Hence mass ratios n are identical Final burnout speed vbo for a given payload mass mPL Overall payload fraction m0 is the total mass of the tandem-stacked vehicle. -
Stanford Football
2019 GAME NOTES STANFORD FOOTBALL @STANFORDFBALL @STANFORDFOOTBALL CONTACT: Scott Swegan | 419.575.9148 | [email protected] SCHEDULE OVERALL 1-2 HOME 1-0 | AWAY 0-2 | NEUTRAL 0-0 PAC-12 0-1 HOME 0-0 | AWAY 0-1 | NEUTRAL 0-0 NORTHWESTERN (FOX) W 1 PM PT • AUG. 31 17-7 at USC (ESPN) L 7:30 PM PT • SEPT. 7 20-45 at #17/16 UCF (ESPN) L Oregon Ducks Stanford Cardinal 12:30 PM PT • SEPT. 14 27-45 Record ..................................................................2-1 (0-0 Pac-12) Record ..................................................................1-2 (0-1 Pac-12) Ranking (AP/Coaches)..........................................................16/17 Ranking (AP/Coaches)........................................................NR/NR #16/17 OREGON (ESPN) 4 PM PT • SEPT. 21 • STANFORD STADIUM Head Coach .......................................................... Mario Cristobal Head Coach ................................................................David Shaw Career Record ..............................................................38-53 (8th) Career Record ..............................................................83-28 (9th) at OREGON STATE (PAC-12 NETwOrk) Record at Oregon .........................................................11-5 (2nd) Record at Stanford ...............................................................same 4 PM PT • SEPT. 28 • CORVALLIS, ORE. Location ................................................................... Eugene, Ore. Location ........................................................Stanford, California -
Into the Unknown Together the DOD, NASA, and Early Spaceflight
Frontmatter 11/23/05 10:12 AM Page i Into the Unknown Together The DOD, NASA, and Early Spaceflight MARK ERICKSON Lieutenant Colonel, USAF Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama September 2005 Frontmatter 11/23/05 10:12 AM Page ii Air University Library Cataloging Data Erickson, Mark, 1962- Into the unknown together : the DOD, NASA and early spaceflight / Mark Erick- son. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-58566-140-6 1. Manned space flight—Government policy—United States—History. 2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration—History. 3. Astronautics, Military—Govern- ment policy—United States. 4. United States. Air Force—History. 5. United States. Dept. of Defense—History. I. Title. 629.45'009'73––dc22 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the editor and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public re- lease: distribution unlimited. Air University Press 131 West Shumacher Avenue Maxwell AFB AL 36112-6615 http://aupress.maxwell.af.mil ii Frontmatter 11/23/05 10:12 AM Page iii To Becky, Anna, and Jessica You make it all worthwhile. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Frontmatter 11/23/05 10:12 AM Page v Contents Chapter Page DISCLAIMER . ii DEDICATION . iii ABOUT THE AUTHOR . ix 1 NECESSARY PRECONDITIONS . 1 Ambling toward Sputnik . 3 NASA’s Predecessor Organization and the DOD . 18 Notes . 24 2 EISENHOWER ACT I: REACTION TO SPUTNIK AND THE BIRTH OF NASA . 31 Eisenhower Attempts to Calm the Nation . -
Stanford Football Game Notes 98
GAME TWO STANFORD FOOTBALL GAME NOTES CONTACT: Scott Swegan | 419.575.9148 | [email protected] SCHEDULE OVERALL 0-1 HOME 0-0 | AWAY 0-1 | NEUTRAL 0-0 PAC-12 0-1 HOME 0-0 | AWAY 0-1 | NEUTRAL 0-0 OREGON (ABC) L 4:30 PM • NOV. 7 14-35 COLORADO (ESPN2) 12:30 PM • NOV. 14 WASHINGTON STATE (FS1) Colorado Bu!aloes Stanford Cardinal 8 PM • NOV. 21 Record ..................................................................1-0 (1-0 Pac-12) Record ..................................................................0-1 (0-1 Pac-12) CALIFORNIA (FOX) Ranking (AP/Coaches)........................................................NR/NR Ranking (AP/Coaches)........................................................NR/NR 1:30 PM • NOV. 27 Head Coach .................................................................Karl Dorrell Head Coach ................................................................David Shaw Career Record ..............................................................36-27 (6th) Career Record ............................................................86-35 (10th) WASHINGTON (TBD) Record at Colorado ..........................................................1-0 (1st) Record at Stanford ...............................................................same TBD • DEC. 5 Location .................................................................Boulder, Colo. Location ................................................................Stanford, Calif. Founded .................................................................................1876 Founded -
THE EARLY APOLLO PROGRAM Project Apollo Was an American Space Project Which Landed People on the Moon and Brought Them Safely Back to Earth
AIAA AEROSPACE M ICRO-LESSON Easily digestible Aerospace Principles revealed for K-12 Students and Educators. These lessons will be sent on a bi-weekly basis and allow grade-level focused learning. - AIAA STEM K-12 Committee. THE EARLY APOLLO PROGRAM Project Apollo was an American space project which landed people on the Moon and brought them safely back to Earth. Most people know about Apollo 1, in which three astronauts lost their lives in a fire during a countdown rehearsal, and about Apollo 8, which flew to the Moon, orbited around it, and returned to Earth. Just about everybody knows about Apollo 11, which first landed astronauts on the Moon. But what happened in between these missions? This lesson explores the lesser-known but still essential building blocks of the later missions’ success. Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS): ● Discipline: Engineering Design ● Crosscutting Concept: Systems and System Models ● Science & Engineering Practice: Constructing Explanations and Designing Solutions GRADES K-2 K-2-ETS1-1. Ask questions, make observations, and gather information about a situation people want to change to define a simple problem that can be solved through the development of a new or improved object or tool. NASA engineers knew that Apollo astronauts would need special training to succeed in their missions to the moon, but how could they train under conditions similar to those the crew would encounter? One answer was to send them to places with barren areas and volcanic features that were like what they expected to find on the lunar surface. The astronauts received geology training as well as practicing maneuvers in their spacesuits and driving a replica of the GRADES K-2 (CONTINUED) lunar rover vehicle. -
20/20 Stanford Cardinal #9/9 Notre Dame Fighting Irish 8-3 Overall 9-2 Overall Date Opponent Time • Result Date Opponent Time • Result 8.26 Vs
#20/20 Stanford Cardinal #9/9 Notre Dame Fighting Irish 8-3 overall 9-2 overall Date Opponent Time • Result Date Opponent Time • Result 8.26 vs. Rice [ESPN] ..................................................... W, 62-7 9.2 Temple .............................................................W, 49-16 9.9 at #6/5 USC* [FOX] ...............................................L, 24-42 9.9 #15 Georgia .......................................................L, 19-20 9.16 at San Diego State [CBS Sports Network] ..........L, 17-20 9.16 at Boston College ............................................W, 49-20 9.23 UCLA* [ESPN]..................................................... W, 58-34 9.23 at Michigan State .............................................W, 38-18 9.30 Arizona State* [Pac-12 Networks] .................... W, 34-24 9.30 Miami (Ohio) ....................................................W, 52-17 10.7 at #20/18 Utah* [FS1] ........................................ W, 23-20 10.7 at North Carolina .............................................W, 33-10 10.14 Oregon* [FS1] ...................................................... W, 49-7 #20/20 Stanford #9/9 Notre Dame 10.21 #11 USC ............................................................W, 49-14 10.26 at Oregon State* [ESPN] ................................... W, 15-14 10.28 #14 North Carolina State .................................W, 35-14 11.4 at #25 Washington State* [FOX] .........................L, 21-24 Cardinal Fighting Irish 11.4 Wake Forest .....................................................W, -
Albo Nfl Usa
Enciclopedia del football italiano Albo d’oro National Football League (American Professional Football Association (1920) / American Football League – National Football League ) 1 aggiornato domenica 30 agosto 2020 Enciclopedia del football italiano Albo d’oro National Football League (American Professional Football Association (1920) / American Football League – National Football League ) Albo d’Oro 1920 Akron PROS - 1921 Chicago STALEYS - 1922 Canton BULLDOGS - 1923 Canton BULLDOGS - 1924 Cleveland BULLDOGS - 1925 Chicago CARDINALS - 1926 Frankford YELLOW JACKETS - 1927 New York GIANTS - 1928 Providence STEAM ROLLER - 1929 Green Bay PACKERS - 1930 Green Bay PACKERS - 1931 Green Bay PACKERS - 1932 Chicago BEARS Portsmouth SPARTANS 9-0 Chicago Stadium, Chicago 1933 Chicago BEARS New York GIANTS 23-21 Wrigley Field, Chicago 1934 New York GIANTS Chicago BEARS 30-13 Polo Grounds, New York 1935 Detroit LIONS New York GIANTS 26-7 Titan Stadium, Detroit 1936 Green Bay PACKERS Boston REDSKINS 21-6 Polo Grounds, New York 1937 Washington REDSKINS Chicago BEARS 28-21 Wrigley Field, Chicago 1938 New York GIANTS Green Bay PACKERS 23-17 Polo Grounds, New York 1939 Green Bay PACKERS New York GIANTS 27-0 Dairy B. at Wisconsin S.F.P., West Allis 1940 Chicago BEARS Washington REDSKINS 73-0 Griffith Stadium, Washington 1941 Chicago BEARS New York GIANTS 37-9 Wrigley Field, Chicago 1942 Washington REDSKINS Chicago BEARS 14-6 Griffith Stadium, Washington 1943 Chicago BEARS Washington REDSKINS 41-21 Wrigley Field, Chicago 1944 Green Bay PACKERS New York GIANTS -
Rose Bowl Operating Company
ROSE BOWL OPERATING COMPANY ROSE BOWL STADIUM RENOVATION STRATEGIC PLAN VOLUME III of IV MARKET ANALYSIS (ADDITIONAL DUE DILIGENCE) PRELIMINARY DRAFT – SUBJECT TO REVISION PRESENTED BY: May 2, 2010 Preliminary Draft – Subject to Revision Page 1 Table of Contents I. Historical Operating Characteristics 9 Rose Bowl Operating Company 9 UCLA FbllFootball 9 Tournament of Roses II. NCAA Stadium Case Studies III. Regional Demographic Overview IV. Regional Facility Overview Terms and Conditions (See Volume I) Preliminary Draft – Subject to Revision Page 2 I. Historical Operating Characteristics Preliminary Draft – Subject to Revision Page 3 I. Historical Operating Characteristics Rose Bowl Operating Company Historical Operating Characteristics Preliminary Draft – Subject to Revision Page 4 I. Historical Operating Characteristics Rose Bowl Operating Company – Event Mix UCLA Football Rose Bowl Operating Company Rose Bowl Ga me Event Mix Concerts (ExcludesFlea Market and Minor Events) Soccer Other 20 15 10 5 0 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 (E) Source: Rose Bowl Operating Company. Preliminary Draft – Subject to Revision Page 5 I. Historical Operating Characteristics Rose Bowl Operating Company – Advertising Revenue ADVERTISING REVENUE 5-Year FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 (E) Average Average Gross Advertising Non-Premier Partnerships $808,117 $565,859 $515,809 $444,862 $467,113 $441,829 $296,509 $353,096 $265,365 $364,782 $486,649 Premier Partnerships$0$0$50,000 $206,500 $433,615 $551,682 $663,397