DOCSLIB.ORG

Brian Crozier Papers, 1936-1993

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf358002hf No online items Register of the Brian Crozier Papers, 1936-1993 Processed by Linda Bernard; machine-readable finding aid created by Xiuzhi Zhou Hoover Institution Archives Stanford University Stanford, California 94305-6010 Phone: (650) 723-3563 Fax: (650) 725-3445 Email: [email protected] © 1997 Hoover Institution Archives. All rights reserved. Register of the Brian Crozier 85035 1 Papers, 1936-1993 Register of the Brian Crozier Papers, 1936-1993 Hoover Institution Archives Stanford University Stanford, California Contact Information Hoover Institution Archives Stanford University Stanford, California 94305-6010 Phone: (650) 723-3563 Fax: (650) 725-3445 Email: [email protected] Processed by: Linda Bernard Date Completed: 1995 Encoded by: Xiuzhi Zhou © 1997 Hoover Institution Archives. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Brian Crozier Papers, Date (inclusive): 1936-1993 Collection number: 85035 Creator: Crozier, Brian Collection Size: 9 manuscript boxes, 1 envelope(3.9 linear feet) Repository: Hoover Institution Archives Stanford, California 94305-6010 Abstract: Writings, correspondence, memoranda, book reviews, and printed matter, relating to the Cold War and world politics since World War II, international communism, terrorism, espionage and insurgency movements, and the Institute for the Study of Conflict. Language: English. Access Collection is open for research. The Hoover Institution Archives only allows access to copies of audiovisual items. To listen to sound recordings or to view videos or films during your visit, please contact the Archives at least two working days before your arrival. We will then advise you of the accessibility of the material you wish to see or hear. Please note that not all audiovisual material is immediately accessible. Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Archives Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Brian Crozier Papers, [Box no.], Hoover Institution Archives. Acquisition Information Acquired by the Hoover Institution Archives in 1985. Accruals Materials may have been added to the collection since this finding aid was prepared. To determine if this has occurred, find the collection in Stanford University's online catalog at http://searchworks.stanford.edu/ . Materials have been added to the collection if the number of boxes listed in the online catalog is larger than the number of boxes listed in this finding aid. Alternative Form Available Register of the Brian Crozier 85035 2 Papers, 1936-1993 Also available on microfilm (11 reels). Access Points World politics--1945- Communism Terrorism Espionage Guerrilla warfare Institute for the Study of Conflict Journalists Great Britain 1918 Born, Australia August 4 1936-1939 Music and art critic, London 1940-1941 Reporter-sub-editor, Stoke on Trent, Stockport, London 1941-1943 Aeronautical inspector 1943-1944 Sub-editor, Reuters 1944-1948 Sub-editor, News Chronicle 1948-1951 Writer, Sydney Morning Herald 1951-1952 Correspondent, Reuters-AAP 1952-1953 Features editor, Straits Times 1954-1964 Leader writer and correspondent, Economist 1954-1966 Commentator, BBC English, French and Spanish overseas services 1960 Author, The Rebels 1963 Author, The Morning After 1964 Author, Neo-Colonialism 1965 Author, South-East Asia in Turmoil 1965-1974 Chairman, Forum World Features 1966 Author, The Struggle for the Third World 1967 Author, Franco 1969 Author, The Masters of Power 1970 Author, The Future of Communist Power 1970-1979 Co-founder and director, Institute for the Study of Conflict 1970-1975 Editor, Conflict Studies 1971 Author, Since Stalin 1973 Author, De Gaulle 1974 Author, A Theory of Conflict 1976 Author, The Man Who Lost China 1978 Author, The Strategy of Survival 1979 Author, The Minimum State 1984 Author, This War Called Peace Box 1 BIOGRAPHICAL FILE, 1937-1984. Scope and Content Note Employment records, personal letters, memoranda, conversation transcripts, press cables, and clippings. Includes speeches and writings and a press file regarding Brian Crozier, attacking him as well as the activities of the Forum World Features and of the Institute for the Study of Conflict Boxes 2-4 CORRRESPONDENCE, 1966-1991. Scope and Content Note Correspondence divided into chronological, alphabetical, and miscellaneous VIP files. Includes some letters to the editor, memoranda, speeches, and writings Register of the Brian Crozier 85035 3 Papers, 1936-1993 SPEECHES AND WRITINGS, 1936-1992. Boxes 4-9 SPEECHES AND WRITINGS, 1936-1992. Scope and Content Note Freelance writings consisting of articles, essays, letters to the editor, memoranda, newspaper columns, reviews, and related correspondence, arranged chronologically by year; and reviews of and background material for Brian Crozier's books, as well as related correspondence and letters to the editor, arranged chronologically by title Box 9 SUBJECT FILE, 1975-1977. Scope and Content Note Parliamentary debate transcripts, clippings, and articles relating to the expulsions from Great Britain of Philip Agee and Mark Hosenball Photo file PHOTOGRAPHS, n.d. Scope and Content Note One print depicting Belkacem Krim and one depicting Sir Robert Thompson BIOGRAPHICAL FILE, 1937-1984 General. Employment records, personal letters, memoranda, conversation transcripts, articles, press cables, speeches, and clippings Box 1., Folder 1 1937-1954 Folder 2 1958-1965 "Great smear campaign." Press files relating to Brian Crozier, attacking him as well as the activities of the Forum World Features and the Institute for the Study of Conflict Folder 3 1975-1976 Folder 4 1977-1984 CORRESPONDENCE, 1966-1991 General. Chronological files relating to Brian Crozier's writings and activities, political conditions in various countries, and world events. Includes some letters to the editor, memoranda, speeches, and writings Box 2., Folder 1 1966-1968. Correspondents include James Cameron, Luis de Caralt, N. D. Clive, L. A. Crozier, Heather Dean, Cecil Eprile, Brian Melland, Maurice Temple Smith, Kenneth Younger Folder 2 1969. Correspondents include Brian Beedham, Max Beloff, W. A. Bradley, John Bright-Holmes, Hugo Brunner, Alastair Burnet, Jerome Ch'en, Sir Alec Douglas-Home, Francois Duchene, Georges Egal, Sir Donald Evants, Jacques Fauvet, Roger Frey, Charles G. Haering, Kenneth Hunt, Louis Joxe, Jean Olie, I. M. Parsons, David Rees, William Rees-Mogg, Jacques Richard, Leonard Schapiro, John Hay Whitney Folder 3 1970. Correspondents include Georges Albertini, George Gale, Charles de Gaulle, Anthony Hartley, Sir William Hayter, Chaim U. Lipschitz, Henri Michel, Tibor Szamuely, Frank Treherne, Kenneth Younger Folder 4 1971. Correspondents include Georges Albertini, William Bader, Hilaire du Berrier, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Robert W. Foster, Howard B. Gotlieb, David Higham, Jean Olie, Joaquim Marco, Dorothy Pickles, Jean Sainteny, Frank Shakespeare, Sir Edward Spears, H. H. Tucker, Richard L. Walker Folder 5 1972. Correspondents include Georges Albertini, Gillon Aitken, Raymond Aron, Ricardo de la Cierva, Robert Conquest, Charles Douglas-Home, C. H. Ellis, Simone Gallimard, Nigel Lawson, E. H. Marsh, Lord Robens, Tibor Szamuely, John Whitehorn, Geoffrey Wolley Register of the Brian Crozier 85035 4 Papers, 1936-1993 CORRESPONDENCE, 1966-1991 Folder 6 1973. Correspondents include Gillon Aitken, Georges Albertini, Julian Amery, Max Beloff, Peter Calvocoressi, C. J. Child, Maurice Cranston, M. F. Cullis, Jacques Fauvet, James FitzSimmons, Andre Fontaine, M. R. D. Foot, Lord Halsbury, Sir Archibald James, Paul Lendvai, John McCuen, Brian Melland, F. S. Miles, Robert Moss, Peter Richards, William Rees-Mogg, Rivers Scott, Harold Sieve, C. Sinclair-Stevenson, William C. Sullivan, Sir Edward Tomkins, David Watt, Simon Wiesenthal. See also 1977 Folder 7 1974. Correspondents include Georges Albertini, David Astor, James Burnham, Lord Carrington, Cheng Yin-fun, C. Richard Cleary, Georges Egal, C. H. Ellis, Harvey Feldman, Manuel Fraga Iribarne, Lord Halsbury, Iain Hamilton, Charles Janson, Sir Keith Joseph, Viktor Lessiovski, J. M. A. Luns, William C. Mott, Malcolm Muggeridge, Aleksei Myagkov, Shih Hsin-jen, John Vernon, Peregrine Worsthorne Folder 8 1975. Correspondents include Peter Baldwin, Hugh Beach, James Burnham, Eric Chou, O. Edmund Clubb, Judith Cooper, Decima Curtis, Sir William Deakin, C. H. Ellis, Manuel Fraga Iribarne, John Graham, Lord Home, Walter Judd, Sir John Killick, William Kintner, Frank Kitson, David Martin, S. W. B. Menaul, Robert Moss, Sir Michael Palliser, Edward Rozek, Helmut Schoeck, Robert C. Stones, Hugh Thomas, Sir Robert Thompson, Philip Toynbee, Prince Wangchuk Folder 9 1976. Correspondents include Frank Brenchley, Zbigniew Brzezinski, James Burnham, Kenneth Cantlie, Lord Chalfont, Winston Churchill, Serge Dassault, Robert A. Fearey, Charles Forte, Sir Ian Gilmour, Hans Josef Horchem, Charles Janson, Sir John Killick, Sir Robert Mark, Burroughs Mitchell, Carlo Pesenti, P. Pooley, Gordon Reece, Robert W. Rust, Margaret Thatcher, Sir Robert Thompson, John Vernon, John Hay Whitney, Paul Wilkinson, Sir David Willison Folder 10 1977. Correspondents include Lord Ardwick, Raymond Aron, John Biggs-Davison, Peter Blaker, F. Castrillo Mazeres, David Chipp, S. Covarrubias Sanhueza, Hernan Cubillos, Viscount De L'Isle, Paul Dupuis, Georges Egal, J. Erickson, Lord Goronwy-Roberts, Stephen Hastings, Fred C. Ikle, Rajmata of Jaipur, Charles Janson, S. W. B. Menaul, Jaime Perriaux, Carlo Pesenti, W. K. Prendergast,
Recommended publications
  • Telling the Truth About Class

    Telling the Truth About Class

    TELLING THE TRUTH ABOUT CLASS G. M. TAMÁS ne of the central questions of social theory has been the relationship Obetween class and knowledge, and this has also been a crucial question in the history of socialism. Differences between people – acting and knowing subjects – may influence our view of the chances of valid cognition. If there are irreconcilable discrepancies between people’s positions, going perhaps as far as incommensurability, then unified and rational knowledge resulting from a reasoned dialogue among persons is patently impossible. The Humean notion of ‘passions’, the Nietzschean notions of ‘resentment’ and ‘genealogy’, allude to the possible influence of such an incommensurability upon our ability to discover truth. Class may be regarded as a problem either in epistemology or in the philosophy of history, but I think that this separation is unwarranted, since if we separate epistemology and the philosophy of history (which is parallel to other such separations characteristic of bourgeois society itself) we cannot possibly avoid the rigidly-posed conundrum known as relativism. In speak- ing about class (and truth, and class and truth) we are the heirs of two socialist intellectual traditions, profoundly at variance with one another, although often intertwined politically and emotionally. I hope to show that, up to a point, such fusion and confusion is inevitable. All versions of socialist endeavour can and should be classified into two principal kinds, one inaugurated by Rousseau, the other by Marx. The two have opposite visions of the social subject in need of liberation, and these visions have determined everything from rarefied epistemological posi- tions concerning language and consciousness to social and political attitudes concerning wealth, culture, equality, sexuality and much else.
  • Der Spiegel-Confirmation from the East by Brian Crozier 1993

    Der Spiegel-Confirmation from the East by Brian Crozier 1993

    "Der Spiegel: Confirmation from the East" Counter Culture Contribution by Brian Crozier I WELCOME Sir James Goldsmith's offer of hospitality in the pages of COUNTER CULTURE to bring fresh news on a struggle in which we were both involved. On the attacking side was Herr Rudolf Augstein, publisher of the German news magazine, Der Spiegel; on the defending side was Jimmy. My own involvement was twofold: I provided him with the explosive information that drew fire from Augstein, and I co-ordinated a truly massive international research campaign that caused Augstein, nearly four years later, to call off his libel suit against Jimmy.1 History moves fast these days. The collapse of communism in the ex-Soviet Union and eastern Europe has loosened tongues and opened archives. The struggle I mentioned took place between January 1981 and October 1984. The past two years have brought revelations and confessions that further vindicate the line we took a decade ago. What did Jimmy Goldsmith say, in 1981, that roused Augstein to take legal action? The Media Committee of the House of Commons had invited Sir James to deliver an address on 'Subversion in the Media'. Having read a reference to the 'Spiegel affair' of 1962 in an interview with the late Franz Josef Strauss in his own news magazine of that period, NOW!, he wanted to know more. I was the interviewer. Today's readers, even in Germany, may not automatically react to the sight or sound of the' Spiegel affair', but in its day, this was a major political scandal, which seriously damaged the political career of Franz Josef Strauss, the then West German Defence Minister.
  • Nunsthorpe Garden City History Group Memories

    Nunsthorpe Garden City History Group Memories

    Nunsthorpe Garden City History Group Memories Compiled by Roy and Sheila Ellis between 2007 and 2017 Acknowledgement We would like to thank all the contributors to this document for their time and patience and most of all their memories. Many thanks to the Second Avenue Resource Centre staff and special mention to Margaret Horsburgh for her help throughout the time we have been meeting at the centre and her special talent for proof reading. Full marks to Jayne Smith for her skills as a tutor to two very inexperienced computer students, we appreciate the help given us, some of which was in her own time. To David Cowell for the photographs of 1936 school days which he made available to us. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Table of Contents MURIEL PARKER (NEE GREEN) ................................................................................ 1 GLADYS WARMAN (NEE KULLICH) ........................................................................ 3 The Lamp Lighter ................................................................................................................ 5 Tiger Kullich ....................................................................................................................... 9 RON ELLIS ..................................................................................................................... 13 JACK HOPPER ............................................................................................................... 17 BETTY MARRIOTT (NEE ROSS) ..............................................................................
  • Open PDF in New Window

    Open PDF in New Window

    The National Archives' reference CAB 130/1224 .!r J3al I Catala ue Reference:cab/130/1224 Ima e Reference:1 © Crown Copyright The National Archives' reference CAB 130/1224 I TOP SECRET I ~ THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF HER BRITANNIC MAJESTY'S GOVERNMENT • The circulation of this paper has been strictty limited. This copy is issued for the personal use of. ............................. Copy No ..................... " MISC 7(83) 2nd Meeting CABL'IBT NUCLEAR DEFENCE POLICY MINUTES of a Meeting held in 10 Downing Street on TUESDAY 8 MARCH 1983 at q.30 pm PRESENT The Rt Hon Margaret Thatcher MP Prime Minister The Rt Hon William Whitelaw MP The Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey Howe QC MP Secretary of State for the Chancellor of the Exchequer Home Department The Rt Hon Francis Pym MP The Rt Hon Michael Heseltine MP Secretary of State for Foreign Secretary of State for Defence and Commonwealth Affairs A.LSO PRESENT Field Marshall Sir Edwin Bram.all Chief of the Defence Staff SECRETARIAT ·Sir Robert Armstrong Mr ADS Goodall Mr R LL Facer SUBJECT BASING OF UNITED STATES CRUISE MISSILES ? • I TOP SECRET I e Refenmce:cab/130/1224 Reference:1 © Crown Copyright The National Archives' reference CAB 130/1224 I TOP SECRET I BASING OF UNITED STATES CRUISE If.ISSILES - Previous Reference: MISC 7(83)1st Meeting Ministers resumed their consideration of control arrangements for United States Ground Launched Cruise Missiles (GLCMs) to be based in the United Kingdom. They had before them a minute from the Secretary of State for Defence dated 25 January about the timing
  • Thatcher, Northern Ireland and Anglo-Irish Relations, 1979-1990

    Thatcher, Northern Ireland and Anglo-Irish Relations, 1979-1990

    From ‘as British as Finchley’ to ‘no selfish strategic interest’: Thatcher, Northern Ireland and Anglo-Irish Relations, 1979-1990 Fiona Diane McKelvey, BA (Hons), MRes Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences of Ulster University A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Ulster University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2018 I confirm that the word count of this thesis is less than 100,000 words excluding the title page, contents, acknowledgements, summary or abstract, abbreviations, footnotes, diagrams, maps, illustrations, tables, appendices, and references or bibliography Contents Acknowledgements i Abstract ii Abbreviations iii List of Tables v Introduction An Unrequited Love Affair? Unionism and Conservatism, 1885-1979 1 Research Questions, Contribution to Knowledge, Research Methods, Methodology and Structure of Thesis 1 Playing the Orange Card: Westminster and the Home Rule Crises, 1885-1921 10 The Realm of ‘old unhappy far-off things and battles long ago’: Ulster Unionists at Westminster after 1921 18 ‘For God's sake bring me a large Scotch. What a bloody awful country’: 1950-1974 22 Thatcher on the Road to Number Ten, 1975-1979 26 Conclusion 28 Chapter 1 Jack Lynch, Charles J. Haughey and Margaret Thatcher, 1979-1981 31 'Rise and Follow Charlie': Haughey's Journey from the Backbenches to the Taoiseach's Office 34 The Atkins Talks 40 Haughey’s Search for the ‘glittering prize’ 45 The Haughey-Thatcher Meetings 49 Conclusion 65 Chapter 2 Crisis in Ireland: The Hunger Strikes, 1980-1981
  • Wilson, MI5 and the Rise of Thatcher Covert Operations in British Politics 1974-1978 Foreword

    Wilson, MI5 and the Rise of Thatcher Covert Operations in British Politics 1974-1978 Foreword

    • Forward by Kevin McNamara MP • An Outline of the Contents • Preparing the ground • Military manoeuvres • Rumours of coups • The 'private armies' of 1974 re-examined • The National Association for Freedom • Destabilising the Wilson government 1974-76 • Marketing the dirt • Psy ops in Northern Ireland • The central role of MI5 • Conclusions • Appendix 1: ISC, FWF, IRD • Appendix 2: the Pinay Circle • Appendix 3: FARI & INTERDOC • Appendix 4: the Conflict Between MI5 and MI6 in Northern Ireland • Appendix 5: TARA • Appendix 6: Examples of political psy ops targets 1973/4 - non Army origin • Appendix 7 John Colin Wallace 1968-76 • Appendix 8: Biographies • Bibliography Introduction This is issue 11 of The Lobster, a magazine about parapolitics and intelligence activities. Details of subscription rates and previous issues are at the back. This is an atypical issue consisting of just one essay and various appendices which has been researched, written, typed, printed etc by the two of us in less than four months. Its shortcomings should be seen in that light. Brutally summarised, our thesis is this. Mrs Thatcher (and 'Thatcherism') grew out of a right-wing network in this country with extensive links to the military-intelligence establishment. Her rise to power was the climax of a long campaign by this network which included a protracted destabilisation campaign against the Liberal and Labour Parties - chiefly the Labour Party - during 1974-6. We are not offering a conspiracy theory about the rise of Mrs Thatcher, but we do think that the outlines of a concerted campaign to discredit the other parties, to engineer a right-wing leader of the Tory Party, and then a right-wing government, is visible.
  • British Anti-Communist Propaganda and Cooperation with the United States, 1945-1951. Andrew Defty

    British Anti-Communist Propaganda and Cooperation with the United States, 1945-1951. Andrew Defty

    British anti-communist propaganda and cooperation with the United States, 1945-1951. Andrew Defty European Studies Research Institute School of English, Sociology, Politics and Contemporary History University of Salford Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, January 2002 British anti-communist propaganda and cooperation with the United States, 1945-1951 Contents Acknowledgements................................................................................................. .......ii Abbreviations.................................................................................................................iii Abstract..........................................................................................................................iv Introduction....................................................................................................................! Chapter 1 The Origins of Britain's anti-communist propaganda policy 1945-1947.............................28 Chapter 2 Launching the new propaganda policy, 1948.....................................................................74 Chapter 3 Building a concerted counter-offensive: cooperation with other powers, 1948-1950 ........123 Chapter 4 'Close and continuous liaison': British and American cooperation, 1950-1951 .................162 Conclusion .....................................................................................................................216 Notes Introduction .........................................................................................................226
  • The Authorised History of MI5 by Christopher Andrew (Book Review)

    The Authorised History of MI5 by Christopher Andrew (Book Review)

    Lobster 58 The Defence of the Realm The Authorised History of MI5 Christopher Andrew Page 134 Winter 2009/10 Lobster 58 London: Allen Lane, 2009, £30 Covering the same area as the Hennessy/Thomas book but with access to more recent MI5 documents, Andrew does at least refer to the dissenters named in the preceding paragraph. This is a thousand pages long and will be of major interest to academic students of British intelligence and political history for years to come. Discounted from sellers like Amazon, this is a seriously good buy. But I’m not an academic and my interests are political. I looked initially at two areas: what it said about MI5’s relationship with the British left since WW2, and particularly the role of the CPGB in British politics; and the so-called Wilson plots. Let’s take the left first. Elsewhere in this issue is my contribution to the Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom’s book on the 1984 miners’ strike. In that I repeat for the umpteenth time Peter Wright’s story in Spycatcher that MI5 knew about the covert Soviet funding of the CPGB in the 1950s and neither exposed it nor tried to stop it. Wright is rubbished repeatedly by Andrew and he does not refer to this claim of Wright’s. However on p. 403 he writes this: ‘The Security Service had “good coverage” of the secret Soviet funding of the CPGB, monitoring by surveillance and telecheck the regular collection of Moscow’s cash subsidies by two members of the Party’s International Department, Eileen Palmer and Bob Stewart, from the north London address of two ex-trainees of the Moscow Radio School.’ This isn’t dated but from the context it is the early 1950s.
  • Universiv Microfilms International 3Ü0 N

    Universiv Microfilms International 3Ü0 N

    INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. Unless we meant to delete copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed, you will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photo­ graphed the photographer has followed a definite method in “sectioning” the material. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand comer cf a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For any illustrations that cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and tipped into your xerographic copy.
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Department of Government

    London School of Economics and Political Science Department of Government

    London School of Economics and Political Science Department of Government Historical Culture, Conflicting Memories and Identities in post-Soviet Estonia Meike Wulf Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD at the University of London London 2005 UMI Number: U213073 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U213073 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Ih c s e s . r. 3 5 o ^ . Library British Library of Political and Economic Science Abstract This study investigates the interplay of collective memories and national identity in Estonia, and uses life story interviews with members of the intellectual elite as the primary source. I view collective memory not as a monolithic homogenous unit, but as subdivided into various group memories that can be conflicting. The conflict line between ‘Estonian victims’ and ‘Russian perpetrators* figures prominently in the historical culture of post-Soviet Estonia. However, by setting an ethnic Estonian memory against a ‘Soviet Russian’ memory, the official historical narrative fails to account for the complexity of the various counter-histories and newly emerging identities activated in times of socio-political ‘transition’.
  • British Intelligence Against Eoka in Cyprus 1945-1960

    British Intelligence Against Eoka in Cyprus 1945-1960

    BRITISH INTELLIGENCE AGAINST EOKA IN CYPRUS 1945-1960 A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY NİHAL ERKAN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS JULY 2019 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences ___________________________ Prof. Dr. Tülin Gençöz Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ___________________________ Prof.Dr.Oktay Tanrısever Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _____________________ Prof.Dr. Hüseyin Bağcı Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assoc. Prof. Dr. M. Fatih Tayfur (METU, IR) _____________________ Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Bağcı (METU,IR) _____________________ Prof. Dr. Oktay Tanrısever (METU,IR) _____________________ Prof. Dr. Gökhan Koçer (Karadeniz Teknik Uni., ULS) _____________________ Assist. Prof.Dr. Merve Seren (Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Uni., INRE) _____________________ I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Nihal Erkan Signature : iii ABSTRACT BRITISH INTELLIGENCE AGAINST EOKA IN CYPRUS, 1945-1960 Erkan, Nihal Ph.D; Department of International Relations Supervisor: Prof.Dr. Hüseyin Bağcı July 2019, 367 pages This thesis analyses the role of British intelligence activities in the fight against EOKA in Cyprus between 1945 and 1960.
  • Culpable Neutrality Ronald Channing P 13 Hat Is the Moral Worth of a Neutrality out Its Entire Being Like a Stick of Seaside Rock

    Culpable Neutrality Ronald Channing P 13 Hat Is the Moral Worth of a Neutrality out Its Entire Being Like a Stick of Seaside Rock

    Volume LII No. 8 August 1997 £3 (to non-members) Don't miss... Dr Wiener's monument /s /t possible to be equidistant from good and evil? Anthony Grenville p.4 New Holocaust Research Project Culpable neutrality Ronald Channing p 13 hat is the moral worth of a neutrality out its entire being like a stick of seaside rock. Be­ based on equidistance from the combat­ sides, it requires less effort of the imagination to W ants in a struggle of good versus evil? envisage the Mosleys making Britain judenrein than (Para)normal For an answer to this question one need look no to see Jessica Mitford as a Madame Ceausescu clone. life further than Switzerland which, thanks to the In Nazi-occupied Britain deportations would have pressure of world opinion, is daily made more aware been the task of the SS, dubbed the 'black corps' on aranormal - of how reprehensible its wartime conduct had been. account of their fear-inspiring uniforms. Das dictionary But for all the tumbling of skeletons out of the Schtvarze Korps was the organ of the SS and like definition P cupboards of the wartime neutrals - the Swiss, the Der Stiirmer, reached millions of readers via display 'beyond normal Swedes, the Spaniards, the Portuguese, the Vatican cases up and down the country. explanation' - is - indifference to moral issues has by no means van­ the appropriate term Unlike Der Stiirmer's Julius Streicher, who was ished from the contemporary world. for describing hanged at Nuremberg, Schivarze Korps editor A case in point is the high esteem in which Ernst the fact (see p.