DOCSLIB.ORG

Lyle Falls Fish Passage Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lyle Falls Fish Passage Project B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Lyle Falls Fish Passage Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement DOE/EIS-0397 March 2008 Lyle Falls Fish Passage Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0397) Responsible Agencies: U.S. Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration (BPA); Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation (Yakama Nation); Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW); U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (USFS), Title of Proposed Project: Lyle Falls Fish Passage Project State Involved: Washington (WA) Abstract: BPA proposes to fund modification of the existing Lyle Falls Fishway on the lower Klickitat River in Klickitat County, WA. The proposed project would help BPA meet its off-site mitigation responsibilities for anadromous fish affected by the development of the Federal Columbia River Power System and increase overall fish production in the Columbia Basin. The fishway is owned by WDFW and operated by the Yakama Nation. Lyle Falls prevents some upstream migrating fish from reaching the upper watershed, especially when flows are low, and the existing fishway is inefficient. BPA must decide whether to fund the project; WDFW must decide whether to approve the proposed modifications and issue a Hydraulic Project Approval; and the US Forest Service must decide whether the project is consistent with the National Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. The underlying need for the project is to improve fish passage to habitat in the upper part of the watershed. The Draft EIS evaluates the potential environmental impacts of two alternatives: No Action alternative and the Proposed Action. These alternatives are described in detail in Chapter 2 of the Draft EIS. In selecting between the alternatives, BPA will consider the following purposes: provide properly functioning year-round adult fish passage; provide facilities to collect biological information to monitor success of fishery management actions; and enhance opportunities for adult salmonids to access and use habitat in the upper Klickitat River. The proposed project could impact geology and soils, water resources, fisheries, vegetation and wildlife, threatened and endangered species, wetlands and floodplains, cultural resources, air quality, noise, human health, public safety, aesthetics, land use, transportation, recreation, and socioeconomics. Chapter 3 of the EIS describes the Affected Environment and potential impacts in detail. Public comments are being accepted through May 12, 2008. For more information contact: Carl J. Keller – KEC-4 Project Environmental Lead Bonneville Power Administration P. O. Box 3621, KEC-4 Portland, OR 97208-3621 Telephone: (503) 230-7692 Email: [email protected] For additional copies of this document, please call 1-800-622-4520and ask for this document by name. The Draft EIS is also on the Internet at: http://www.efw.bpa.gov/environmental_services/Document_ Library/Lyle Falls/. You may also request copies by writing to: Bonneville Power Administration P. O. Box 3621 Portland, OR 97208 ATT: Public Information Center – CHDL-1 For additional information on DOE NEPA activities, please contact Carol M. Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance, GC-20, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue S.W., Washington D.C. 20585-0103, phone: 1-800-472-2756 or visit the DOE NEPA Web site at www.eh.doe.gov/nepa. Table of Contents Executive Summary.......................................................................................................S-1 S.1 Chapter 1: Purpose of and Need for Action ............................................S-1 S.2 Chapter 2: Alternatives ..............................................................................S-2 S.3 Chapter 3: Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences................................................................................................S-4 S.3.1 Geology and Soils........................................................................S-4 S.3.2 Water Resources..........................................................................S-4 S.3.3 Fisheries .......................................................................................S-5 S.3.4 Vegetation and Wildlife...............................................................S-5 S.3.5 Threatened and Endangered Species ...........................................S-6 S.3.6 Wetlands and Floodplains............................................................S-7 S.3.7 Cultural Resources.......................................................................S-7 S.3.8 Air Quality, Noise, Human Health and Public Safety .................S-7 S.3.9 Aesthetics.....................................................................................S-8 S.3.10 Land Use, Transportation and Recreation ...................................S-8 S.3.11 Socioeconomics ...........................................................................S-9 S.4 Chapter 4: Consultation, Review and Permit Requirements .................S-9 Chapter 1 Purpose of and Need for Action ................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Background .................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Need for the Project..................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Purposes (Objectives) of the Project .......................................................... 1-5 1.4 Decisions to be Made ................................................................................... 1-5 1.4.1 BPA Decisions............................................................................. 1-5 1.4.2 WDFW Decisions........................................................................ 1-6 1.4.3 YN Decisions............................................................................... 1-6 1.4.4 USFS Decisions........................................................................... 1-6 1.5 Scope of this Environmental Analysis........................................................ 1-7 1.5.1 History of the Planning and Scoping Process.............................. 1-7 1.5.2 Issues Studied in Detail................................................................ 1-8 1.5.3 Issues Beyond the Scope of this EIS............................................ 1-8 Chapter 2 Alternatives .................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 No Action Alternative.................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Proposed Action ........................................................................................... 2-4 2.2.1 Location of Proposed Project....................................................... 2-4 2.2.2 Description of the Proposed Action............................................. 2-4 2.3 Alternatives Considered But Eliminated from Detailed Analysis......... 2-17 2.3.1 New East Bank Fishway ............................................................ 2-17 2.3.2 Demolish Existing Fishway and Build a New Fishway............. 2-17 2.3.3 Modify the Waterfall..................................................................2-18 2.4 Comparison of Alternatives ...................................................................... 2-18 Bonneville Power Administration i Executive Summary Chapter 3 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences...................... 3-1 3.1 Geology and Soils ......................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Affected Environment.................................................................. 3-1 3.1.2 Environmental Consequences...................................................... 3-4 3.1.3 Mitigation Measures.................................................................... 3-6 3.2 Water Resources (Hydrology, Water Rights, Water Quality)................. 3-8 3.2.1 Affected Environment.................................................................. 3-8 3.2.2 Environmental Consequences.................................................... 3-12 3.2.3 Mitigation Measures.................................................................. 3-17 3.3 Fisheries ...................................................................................................... 3-18 3.3.1 Affected Environment................................................................ 3-18 3.3.2 Environmental Consequences.................................................... 3-28 3.3.3 Mitigation Measures.................................................................. 3-42 3.4 Vegetation and Wildlife............................................................................. 3-43 3.4.1 Affected Environment................................................................ 3-43 3.4.2 Environmental Consequences.................................................... 3-52 3.4.3 Mitigation Measures.................................................................. 3-56 3.5 Threatened and Endangered Species....................................................... 3-58 3.5.1 Affected Environment................................................................ 3-58 3.5.2 Environmental Consequences.................................................... 3-65 3.5.3 Mitigation Measures.................................................................. 3-68 3.6 Wetlands and Floodplains......................................................................... 3-69 3.6.1 Affected
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cornaceae – Dogwood Family Cornus Florida Flowering Dogwood
    Cornaceae – dogwood family Cornus florida flowering dogwood Sight ID characteristics Vegetative Features: • Leaf: 2 1/2-5" long, simple, opposite, deciduous, elliptical to ovate with arcuate venation and an entire margin. • Bark: broken into small brown-black plates on mature trees. • Form: usually as several wide-spreading branches with a low dense crown – opposite branching gives candelabra form. • Reproductive Features: • Few, small, perfect, 4-parted flowers with inferior ovaries arranged in heads subtended by 4 notched, showy, white-pink bracts. • Fruits are oval shaped drupes in heads of 5-6, red at maturity, with oval grooved stone. 123 NOTES AND SKETCHES 124 Cornaceae – dogwood family Cornus nuttallii Pacific dogwood Sight ID characteristics Vegetative Features: • Leaf: 2 1/2-4 1/2" long, simple, opposite, deciduous, ovate- elliptical with arcuate venation, margin may be sparsely toothed or entire. • Bark: dark and broken into small plates at maturity. • Form: straight trunk and narrow crown in forested conditions, many-trunked and bushy in open. • Reproductive Features: • Many yellowish-green, small, perfect, 4-parted flowers with inferior ovaries arranged in dense in heads, subtended by 4-7 showy white- pink, petal-like bracts - not notched at the apex. • Fruits are drupes in heads of 30-40, red at maturity and they have smooth stones. 125 NOTES AND SKETCHES 126 Cornaceae – dogwood family Cornus sericea red-osier dogwood Sight ID characteristics Vegetative Features: • Leaf: 2-4" long, simple, opposite, deciduous and somewhat narrow ovate-lanceolate with entire margin. • Twig: bright red, sometimes green splotched with red, white pith. • Bark: red to green with numerous lenticels; later developing larger cracks and splits and turning light brown.
    [Show full text]
  • Shrub List for Brighton 2010
    Shrub List For Brighton 2010 Large Shrubs 10’ -20’ Tall by 6’ – 25’ wide Acer ginnala Amur Maple Acer tataricum Tatarian Maple (better than Amur Maple) Acer grandidentatum Bigtooth Maple Amelanchier alnifolia Saskatoon Serviceberry Amelanchier canadensis Shadblow Serviceberry Caragana arborescens Siberian Peashrub Cercocarpus ledifolius Mountain Mahogany Cotoneaster lucidus Peking Cotoneaster Cowania mexicana Quince Bush, Cliffrose Crataefus ambigua Russian Hawthorn Forestiera neomexicana New Mexican Privet Hippophae rhamnoides Sea Buckthorn Juniperus species Juniper Kolkwitzia amabilis Beauty Bush Pinus mugo Mugo Pine species Prunus americana American Plum Prunus virginiana ‘Shubert’ Canada Red Chokecherry Ptelea trifoliata Wafer Ash or Hop tree Quercus gambelii Gambel Oak Rhus typhina Staghorn Sumac Robinia neomexicana New Mexico Locust Sambucus species Elders Shepherdia argentea Buffaloberry Syringa vulgaris Common Lilac Viburnum lantana Wayfaring Tree, Viburnum Medium Size Shrubs >10’ high by >8’ wide Amorpha fruticosa False Indigo Atriplex canescens Fourwing Saltbush Buddleia davidii Butterfly Bush Cercocarpus montanus Mountain Mahogany Chamaebatiaria millefolium Fernbush Chrysothamnus nauseosus Rubber Rabbitbrush Cornus sericea Redtwig Dogwood Cotinus coggygria Smoke Tree Cotoneaster species Cotoneaster Cytisus scoparius ‘Moonlight’ Moonlight Broom Euonymus alatus Burning Bush Forsythia x intermedia Forsythia Hibiscus syriacus Rose-of-Sharon Juniperus species Juniper Ligustrum vulgare Privet Lonicera species Honeysuckle Mahonia aquifolium Oregon Grape Holly Philadelphus species Mockorange Pyracantha coccinea Firethorn Physocarpus opulifolius Common Ninebark Prunus besseyi Western Sand Cherry Pyracantha coccinea species Firethorn Rhamnus frangula Glossy Buckthorn Ribes species Currant Sambucus species Elder Spiraea x vanhouttei Vanhouttei Spirea Symphoricarpos albus Snowberry Syringa meyeri „Palibin‟ Dwarf Korean Lilac Syringa patula „Miss Kim‟ Dwarf Lilac Viburnum species (dozens of different types) Small Size Shrubs > 5’ tall by >6.
    [Show full text]
  • Flower Power
    FLOWER POWER IDAHO BOTANICAL GARDEN WHAT IS A FLOWER? INSTRUCTIONAL OBJECTIVE: When students finish this project, they will have gained respect for the beauty of flowers and appreciate their ecological and practical importance. INTRODUCTION Dear Teacher, The Idaho Botanical Garden is an outdoor learning environment. We want to make your visit comfortable and enjoyable, and ask that your students are dressed appropriately for the weather and have water, especially in the warm weather months. TERMS Angiosperms: Flowering plants that produce seeds enclosed in a fruit. Anthers: The boxlike structures at the top of stamens, where pollen is produced. Botanical garden: A place where plants are collected and displayed for scientific, educational and artistic purposes. Fertilization: The union of male sperm cells and female egg cells. Filament: The stalk of the stamen. Flower: The reproductive structure of an angiosperm. Fruit: A ripened ovary conaining seeds. Nectar: The sweet liquid produced by flowers to attract pollinators. Ovary: The hollow compartment at the base of the pistil which contains ovules. It develops into a fruit containing seeds. Ovules: The structures in a flower ovary that can develop into seeds. Pistil: The female part of a flower; stigma, style, and ovary. Pollen: A yellow, powder-like material containing sperm cells. Pollen tubes: Tubes that carry sperm cells from the stigma into the ovary. Pollination: The process of pollen coming together with the stigma of a flower. Pollinators: Animals which carry pollen from one flower to another. Seed: A structure containing a baby plant and its food supply, which is surrounded by a protective seed coat.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................1 CREATING A WILDLIFE FRIENDLY YARD ......................................................................2 With Plant Variety Comes Wildlife Diversity...............................................................2 Existing Yards....................................................................................................2 Native Plants ......................................................................................................3 Why Choose Organic Fertilizers?......................................................................3 Butterfly Gardens...............................................................................................3 Fall Flower Garden Maintenance.......................................................................3 Water Availability..............................................................................................4 Bird Feeders...................................................................................................................4 Provide Grit to Assist with Digestion ................................................................5 Unwelcome Visitors at Your Feeders? ..............................................................5 Attracting Hummingbirds ..................................................................................5 Cleaning Bird Feeders........................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropological Study of Yakama Tribe
    1 Anthropological Study of Yakama Tribe: Traditional Resource Harvest Sites West of the Crest of the Cascades Mountains in Washington State and below the Cascades of the Columbia River Eugene Hunn Department of Anthropology Box 353100 University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195-3100 [email protected] for State of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife WDFW contract # 38030449 preliminary draft October 11, 2003 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 4 Executive Summary 5 Map 1 5f 1. Goals and scope of this report 6 2. Defining the relevant Indian groups 7 2.1. How Sahaptin names for Indian groups are formed 7 2.2. The Yakama Nation 8 Table 1: Yakama signatory tribes and bands 8 Table 2: Yakama headmen and chiefs 8-9 2.3. Who are the ―Klickitat‖? 10 2.4. Who are the ―Cascade Indians‖? 11 2.5. Who are the ―Cowlitz‖/Taitnapam? 11 2.6. The Plateau/Northwest Coast cultural divide: Treaty lines versus cultural 12 divides 2.6.1. The Handbook of North American Indians: Northwest Coast versus 13 Plateau 2.7. Conclusions 14 3. Historical questions 15 3.1. A brief summary of early Euroamerican influences in the region 15 3.2. How did Sahaptin-speakers end up west of the Cascade crest? 17 Map 2 18f 3.3. James Teit‘s hypothesis 18 3.4. Melville Jacobs‘s counter argument 19 4. The Taitnapam 21 4.1. Taitnapam sources 21 4.2. Taitnapam affiliations 22 4.3. Taitnapam territory 23 4.3.1. Jim Yoke and Lewy Costima on Taitnapam territory 24 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Layout 1 Copy 1
    Events Contact Information Map and guide to points Festivals Goldendale From the lush, heavily forested April Earth Day Celebration – Chamber of Commerce of interest in and around Goldendale 903 East Broadway west side to the golden wheat May Fiddle Around the Stars Bluegrass 509 773-3400 W O Y L country in the east, Klickitat E L www.goldendalechamber.org L E Festival – Goldendale S F E G W N O June Spring Fest – White Salmon E L County offers a diverse selection Mt. Adams G R N O H E O July Trout Lake Festival of the Arts G J Chamber of Commerce Klickitat BICKLETON CAROUSEL July Community Days – Goldendale 1 Heritage Plaza, White Salmon STONEHENGE MEMORIAL of family activities and sight ~ Presby Quilt Show 509 493-3630 seeing opportunities. ~ Show & Shine Car Show www.mtadamschamber.com COUNTY July Nights in White Salmon City of Goldendale Wine-tasting, wildlife, outdoor Art & Fusion www.cityofgoldendale.com WASHINGTON Aug Maryhill Arts Festival sports, and breathtaking Sept Huckleberry Festival – Bingen Museums scenic beauty beckon visitors Dec I’m Dreaming of a White Salmon Carousel Museum–Bickleton Holiday Festival 509 896-2007 throughout the seasons. Y E L S Open May-Oct Thurs-Sun T E J O W W E G A SON R R Rodeos Gorge Heritage Museum D PETE O L N HAE E IC Y M L G May Goldendale High School Rodeo BLUEBIRDS IN BICKLETON 509 493-3228 HISTORIC RED HOUSE - GOLDENDALE June Aldercreek Pioneer Picnic and Open May-Sept Thurs-Sun Rodeo – Cleveland Maryhill Museum of Art June Ketcham Kalf Rodeo – Glenwood 509 773-3733 Aug Klickitat County Fair and Rodeo – Open Daily Mar 15-Nov 15 Goldendale www.maryhillmuseum.org Aug Cayuse Goldendale Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • White Salmon Planning Commission Meeting AGENDA February 24, 2021
    White Salmon Planning Commission Meeting AGENDA February 24, 2021 – 5:30 PM Via Zoom Teleconference Meeting ID: 840 1289 8223 Passcode: 623377 Call in Numbers: 669-900-6833 929-205-6099 301-715-8592 346-248-7799 253-215-8782 312-626-6799 We ask that the audience call in instead of videoing in or turn off your camera, so video does not show during the meeting to prevent disruption. Thank you. Call to Order/Roll Call Public Comment – Draft Elements 1. Public comment will not be taken during the teleconference. Public comment submitted by email to Jan Brending at [email protected] by 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, February 24, 2021 will be read during the planning commission meeting and forwarded to all planning commissioners. Please include in the subject line "Public Comment - February 24, 2021 - Planning Commission Meeting." Please indicate whether you live in or outside of the city limits of White Salmon. Discussion Items 2. Presentation and Discussion of Draft Elements a. History and Historic Places b. Transportation c. Public Facilities and Services d. Capital Improvement Program 3. Comprehensive Plan Update Workshop a. Environmental Quality and Critical Areas Element b. Economics Element c. Parks and Recreation Element d. HIstory and Historic Places Element (if time allows) Adjournment 1 File Attachments for Item: 2. Presentation and Discussion of Draft Elements a. HIstory and HIstoric Places b. Transportation c. Public Facilities and Services d. Capital Improvement Program 2 II. HISTORY AND HISTORIC PLACES Background Context and History Environmental context The City of White Salmon lies in a transition zone between the maritime climate west of the Cascade Mountain Range and the dry continental climate of the inter-mountain region to the east.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Or Suitable Plants City of Mccall
    Native or Suitable Plants City of McCall The following list of plants is presented to assist the developer, business owner, or homeowner in selecting plants for landscaping. The list is by no means complete, but is a recommended selection of plants which are either native or have been successfully introduced to our area. Successful landscaping, however, requires much more than just the selection of plants. Unless you have some experience, it is suggested than you employ the services of a trained or otherwise experienced landscaper, arborist, or forester. For best results it is recommended that careful consideration be made in purchasing the plants from the local nurseries (i.e. Cascade, McCall, and New Meadows). Plants brought in from the Treasure Valley may not survive our local weather conditions, microsites, and higher elevations. Timing can also be a serious consideration as the plants may have already broken dormancy and can be damaged by our late frosts. Appendix B SELECTED IDAHO NATIVE PLANTS SUITABLE FOR VALLEY COUNTY GROWING CONDITIONS Trees & Shrubs Acer circinatum (Vine Maple). Shrub or small tree 15-20' tall, Pacific Northwest native. Bright scarlet-orange fall foliage. Excellent ornamental. Alnus incana (Mountain Alder). A large shrub, useful for mid to high elevation riparian plantings. Good plant for stream bank shelter and stabilization. Nitrogen fixing root system. Alnus sinuata (Sitka Alder). A shrub, 6-1 5' tall. Grows well on moist slopes or stream banks. Excellent shrub for erosion control and riparian restoration. Nitrogen fixing root system. Amelanchier alnifolia (Serviceberry). One of the earlier shrubs to blossom out in the spring.
    [Show full text]
  • Hood River – White Salmon Interstate Bridge Replacement Project SDEIS
    (OR SHPO Case No. 19-0587; WA DAHP Project Tracking Code: 2019-05-03456) Draft Historic Resources Technical Report October 1, 2020 Prepared for: Prepared by: In coordination with: 111 SW Columbia 851 SW Sixth Avenue Suite 1500 Suite 1600 Portland, Oregon 97201 Portland, Oregon 97204 This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 1 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Project Alternatives ....................................................................................................................... 3 2.1. No Action Alternative .......................................................................................................... 7 2.2. Preferred Alternative EC-2 ................................................................................................... 8 2.3. Alternative EC-1 ................................................................................................................ 14 2.4. Alternative EC-3 ................................................................................................................ 19 2.5. Construction of the Build Alternatives ............................................................................... 23 3. Methodology ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WWRP Funding Scenerios
    Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program 2015-2017 Critical Habitat Projects Grants Awarded at Different Legislative Funding Levels Number Grant Applicant Rank and Type Project Name Grant Applicant Request Match Total $40 Million $50 Million $60 Million $70 Million $80 Million $90 Million $95 Million $97 Million 1 14-1085A Mountain View Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 2 14-1096A Simcoe Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 3 14-1087A Mid Columbia-Grand Coulee Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $1,730,000 $2,166,500 $3,476,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 4 14-1090A Heart of the Cascades Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $785,500 $2,095,000 $3,404,500 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 5 14-1091A Cowiche Watershed Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $2,200,000 $2,200,000 $59,250 $321,150 6 14-1089A Tunk Valley Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $2,000,000 $2,000,000 7 14-1099A Kettle River Corridor Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife $1,000,000 $1,000,000 8 14-1609C Sage Grouse Habitat Acquisition in Deep Creek Foster Creek Conservation District $302,000 $303,152 $605,152 $20,502,000 $303,152 $20,805,152 $8,730,000 $9,166,500 $10,476,000 $11,785,500 $13,095,000 $14,404,500 $15,059,250 $15,321,150 Type Abbreviations:
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphic Assessment of Thirty Miles of Railroad Infrastructure Along the Klickitat River and Swale Creek, Klickitat County, WA Preliminary Report
    Geomorphic Assessment of Thirty Miles of Railroad Infrastructure along the Klickitat River and Swale Creek, Klickitat County, WA Preliminary Report Prepared by: Will Conley, Hydrologist/Geomorphologist Yakama Nation Fisheries Program Klickitat Field Office Wahkiacus, WA Prepared for: United States Department of Energy Washington State Recreation and Bonneville Power Administration Conservation Office Environment, Fish, and Wildlife Program Salmon Recovery Funding Board Portland, Oregon Olympia, WA Project Number: 1997-056-00 Project Number: 10-1741 May 31, 2015 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Project funding was provided by Bonneville Power Administration project number 1997-056-00 (Klickitat Watershed Enhancement Project) and Salmon Recovery Funding Board project number 10-1741. David Lindley (Habitat Biologist, YNFP) provided valuable assistance inventorying crossing structures and reviewing report drafts. The success of the field-based portion of this study was greatly assisted by coordination with Andrew Kallinen, Ranger, Columbia Hills State Park Complex. 3 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 7 Study Area and Geographic Scope ............................................................................................. 8 Fisheries Significance ................................................................................................................. 9 Study Purpose ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WASHINGTON STATE PARKS and RECREATION COMMISSION 1111 Israel Rd S.W
    Don Hoch Director STATE OF WASHINGTON WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION 1111 Israel Rd S.W. • P.O. Box 42650 • Olympia, WA 98504-2650 • (360) 902-8500 TDD (Telecommunications Device for the Deaf): (360) 664-3133 www.parks.wa.gov STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Date of Issuance: January 14, 2019 Project Name: Klickitat Trail Development Proponent: Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission Lead Agency: Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission Description of proposal: This Klickitat Trail Development project continues previous trail planning and improvement work completed by the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) and Washington State Parks. This is the first phase of a phased environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) that expands on the previous 2003 Environmental Assessment prepared by the USFS, and adopted by Washington State Parks in 2005 as the document used for the original Determination of Non-significance (DNS) to satisfy SEPA requirements. This phased review specifically addresses updated site information identified since the original review, and new information for project modifications or new projects not previously reviewed. Phase 1 of this project proposes to construct a trailhead at Pitt and resurface approximately 12 miles of trail through Swale Canyon. Work also includes minor structural repairs, new decking and railings on seven existing trestles, replacement of one trestle with a free span bridge, and removal of one existing damaged trestle in Swale Canyon. Additionally, a preliminary concept for a potential trailhead at Warwick will be completed. Location of Proposal: Project activities will occur along portions of the Klickitat State Park Trail right-of-way corridor in Klickitat County.
    [Show full text]