Roman Architecture with Professor Diana EE Kleiner Lecture 14

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Roman Architecture with Professor Diana EE Kleiner Lecture 14 HSAR 252 - Roman Architecture with Professor Diana E. E. Kleiner Lecture 14 – The Mother of All Forums: Civic Architecture in Rome under Trajan 1. Title page with course logo. 2. Portrait of Nerva, Rome [online image]. Wikimedia Commons. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nerva_Tivoli_Massimo.jpg (Accessed March 5, 2009). Portrait of Trajan, Xanten [online image]. Wikimedia Commons. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Trajan-Xanten.JPG (Accessed March 5, 2009). 3. Forum of Julius Caesar, Temple of Venus Genetrix, Rome [online image]. Wikimedia Commons. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Forum-de-César.jpg (Accessed March 5, 2009). Forum of Julius Caesar, Temple of Venus Genetrix, Rome [online image]. Wikimedia Commons. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Caesarforumrom.jpg (Accessed March 5, 2009). 4. Forum of Julius Caesar, Temple of Venus Genetrix, Rome, detail of architectural decoration. Image Credit: Diana E. E. Kleiner. 5. Forum of Julius Caesar, Temple of Venus Genetrix, Rome, frieze with cupids. Reproduced from Pictorial Dictionary of Ancient Rome I by Ernest Nash (1961), fig. 521. 6. Baths of Trajan, Rome, superimposed above Domus Aurea, Esquiline Wing, plan. Reproduced from Roman Architecture by Frank Sear (1982), fig. 90. 7. Baths of Trajan, above the Domus Aurea, Esquiline Wing, Rome, aerial view. Credit: Google Earth. Baths of Trajan, Rome, model. Reproduced from Ancient Rome, Yesterday and Today by Bruno Brizzi (1973), p. 59. 8. Forum of Trajan, Rome, aerial view. Reproduced from Rome of the Caesars by Leonardo B. Dal Maso (1977), pp. 58-59. 9. Forum of Trajan, Rome, aerial view. Credit: Google Earth. 10. Imperial Fora, Rome, plan. Reproduced from Roman Imperial Architecture by John B. Ward-Perkins (1981), fig. 6. Courtesy of Yale University Press. 11. Forum of Trajan, Rome, plan. Credit: Yale University. Forum of Trajan, Rome, coin with entrance to forum. Reproduced from A History of Roman Art by Fred S. Kleiner (2007), fig. 11-7. 12. Forum of Trajan, Rome, Dacian, Vatican Museums. Image Credit: Diana E. E. Kleiner. Dacian Prisoner, Markets of Trajan Museum. Image Credit: Diana E. E. Kleiner. 13. Forum of Trajan, Rome, model [online image]. Wikimedia Commons. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Plan_Rome_caen_Forum_Trajan.jpg (Accessed March 5, 2009). 14. Forum of Trajan, Rome, plan. Credit: Yale University. Forum of Trajan, Rome, coin with entrance to basilica. 15. Forum of Trajan, Rome, restored view of west colonnade and entrance to basilica. Reproduced from The Forum of Trajan in Rome by James E. Packer (2001), fig. 159. 16. Forum of Trajan, Rome, restored view of east colonnade and sculptural program. Reproduced from The Forum of Trajan in Rome by James E. Packer (2001), fig. 62. Forum of Trajan, Rome, restored view of Basilica Ulpia, south facade. Reproduced from The Forum of Trajan in Rome by James E. Packer (2001), fig. 62. 17. Forum of Trajan, Rome, restored view of east hemicycle. Reproduced from The Forum of Trajan in Rome by James E. Packer (2001), fig. 66. Forum of Trajan, Rome, east hemicycle with military statue. Reproduced from The Forum of Trajan in Rome by James E. Packer (2001), fig. 64. Forum of Trajan, Rome, east hemicycle with statue in toga. Reproduced from The Forum of Trajan in Rome by James E. Packer (2001), fig. 65. Forum of Trajan, Rome, restored view of east colonnade and sculptural program. Reproduced from The Forum of Trajan in Rome by James E. Packer (2001), figs. 60-61. Forum of Trajan, Rome, east colonnade with fragment of shield portrait. Reproduced from The Forum of Trajan in Rome by James E. Packer (2001), fig. 55. Forum of Trajan, Rome, east colonnade with fragment of head of Nerva from shield portrait. Reproduced from The Forum of Trajan in Rome by James E. Packer (2001), fig. 56. 18. Forum of Trajan, Rome, Basilica Ulpia, restored view of interior. Reproduced from The Forum of Trajan in Rome by James E. Packer (2001), fig. 154. 19. Forum of Trajan, Rome, Basilica Ulpia, aerial view from top of Column of Trajan. Image Credit: Diana E. E. Kleiner. 20. Forum of Trajan, Rome, Basilica Ulpia, frieze with victories slaying bulls. Reproduced from Pictorial Dictionary of Ancient Rome I by Ernest Nash (1961), fig. 553. 21. Forum of Trajan, Rome, plan, Credit: Yale University. 22. Forum of Trajan, Rome, library, model. 23. Forum of Trajan, Rome, the west library, restored view. Reproduced from The Forum of Trajan in Rome by James E. Packer (2001), fig. 78. 24. Column of Trajan, Rome, general view [online image]. Wikimedia Commons. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Colonnatraiana.jpg (Accessed March 5, 2009). Column of Trajan, Rome, general view. Image Credit: Diana E. E. Kleiner. 25. Column of Trajan, Rome, lowest spirals. Image Credit: Diana E. E. Kleiner. 26. Column of Trajan, Rome, personification of Danube River. Image Credit: Diana E. E. Kleiner. 27. Column of Trajan, Rome, construction of fort. Image Credit: Diana E. E. Kleiner. 28. Column of Trajan, Rome, battle scene at fort. Reproduced from Art and Archaeology of Rome by Andrea Augenti, ed. (2000), p. 43 (top). 29. Column of Trajan, Rome, suicide of Decebalus. Reproduced from A History of Roman Art by Fred S. Kleiner (2007), fig. 11-13. 30. Column of Trajan, Rome, plaster casts of all scenes, Museo della Civiltà Romana, Rome. Image Credit: Diana E. E. Kleiner. 31. The Firefighters’ Monument, New York, Ground Zero, general view. Image Credit: Diana E. E. Kleiner. 32. Forum of Trajan, Rome, north end with Column of Trajan, model. Reproduced from Rome of the Caesars by Leonardo B. Dal Maso (1977), p. 53. Forum of Trajan, Rome, north end with Column of Trajan, plan. 33. Column of Trajan, Rome, Renaissance engraving of spiral staircase. Reproduced from Rome: The Center of Power by R. Bianchi Bandinelli (1970), fig. 264. Column of Trajan, Rome, burial chamber of Trajan and Plotina. Reproduced from Rome: The Center of Power by R. Bianchi Bandinelli (1970), fig. 267. 34. Column of Trajan, Rome, top of column [online image]. Wikimedia Commons. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:RomaColonnaTraianaCima.jpg (Accessed March 5, 2009). Column of Trajan, Rome, coin with Column of Trajan with heroic statue [online image]. Wikimedia Commons. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aureo_di_traiano_con_la_colonna_traiana.jpg (Accessed March 5, 2009). 35. Forum of Trajan, Rome, restored view. Reproduced from A History of Roman Art by Fred S. Kleiner (2007), fig. 11-6 (James Packer and John Burge). 36. Imperial Fora, Rome, plan. Reproduced from Roman Imperial Architecture by James B. Ward-Perkins (1981), fig. 6. Courtesy of Yale University Press. 37. Markets of Trajan, Rome, general view. Image Credit: Diana E. E. Kleiner. 38. Markets of Trajan, Rome, taberna. Image Credit: Diana E. E. Kleiner. 39. Markets of Trajan, Rome, several tabernae. Image Credit: Diana E. E. Kleiner. 40. Markets of Trajan, Rome, hemicycle [online image]. Wikimedia Commons. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mercati_di_Traiano.jpg (Accessed March 5, 2009). Villa of Publius Fannius Sinistor, Boscoreale, second style painting [online image]. Wikimedia Commons. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pompeii_Fresco_001.jpg (Accessed March 5, 2009). 41. Markets of Trajan, Rome, corridor. Image Credit: Diana E. E. Kleiner. 42. Markets of Trajan, Rome, Via Biberatica. Image Credit: Diana E. E. Kleiner. 43. Markets of Trajan, Rome, axonometric view. Reproduced from Roman Imperial Architecture by John B. Ward-Perkins (1981), fig. 39. Courtesy of Yale University Press. 44. Markets of Trajan, Rome, semi-domed room, exterior. Image Credit: Diana E. E. Kleiner. Markets of Trajan, Rome, semi-domed room with windows. Image Credit: Diana E. E. Kleiner. 45. Markets of Trajan, Rome, Great Hall, restored view. Reproduced from The Architecture of the Roman Empire I by William L. MacDonald (1965), pl. 93. 46. Markets of Trajan, Rome, Great Hall. Reproduced from A History of Roman Art by Fred S. Kleiner (2007), fig. 11-16. Market Hall, Ferentino. Image Credit: J. Keith Doherty. 47. Marketplace, San Francisco. Image Credit: Diana E. E. Kleiner. Markets of Trajan, Rome, Great Hall. Reproduced from A History of Roman Art by Fred S. Kleiner (2007), fig. 11-16. 48. Arch of Titus, Rome, general view. Image Credit: Diana E. E. Kleiner. Arch of Trajan, Benevento, general view. Image Credit: Diana E. E. Kleiner. 49. Arch of Trajan, Benevento, attic relief with Trajan and Hadrian. Reproduced from A History of Roman Art by Fred S. Kleiner (2007), fig. 11-22. .
Recommended publications
  • Daily Coin Relief!
    DAILY COIN RELIEF! A BLOG FOR ANCIENT COINS ON THE PAS BY SAM MOORHEAD & ANDREW BROWN Issue 6 by Andrew Brown – 24 March 2020 Trajan and Dacia Often coins recorded through the PAS hint at or provide direct links to the wider Roman world. This can be anything from depictions of the Emperors, through to places, key events, battles, and even architecture. Good examples of this are seen in the coinage of Trajan (AD 98- 117), particularly in relation to his two military campaigns in Dacia – the landscape of modern-day Romania and Moldova, notably around the Carpathian Mountains (Transylvania) – in AD 101-102 and AD 105-106. Dacia, with her king Decebalus, was considered a potential threat to Rome as well as a source of great natural wealth, particularly gold. Trajan’s victorious Dacian Wars resulted in the southern half of Dacia being annexed as the Roman Marcus Ulpius Traianus province of Dacia Traiana in AD 106, rejuvenated the (AD 98-117) Roman economy, and brought Trajan glory. His triumph (PUBLIC-6A513E) instigated 123 days of celebrations with Roman games that involved 10,000 gladiators and even more wild animals! Coins of Trajan are not uncommon.1 The PAS has over 3,200 examples (https://finds.org.uk/database/search/result s/ruler/256/objecttype/COIN/broadperiod/ ROMAN ) for Trajan alone, as well as much rarer examples of coins struck for his wife Plotina (2 examples), sister Marciana (5 examples), and niece Matidia (1 example). 1 The standard reference is RIC II. However, this has been superseded by the work of Bernhard Woytek, the leading expert on Trajanic coinage, in his Die Reichsprägung des Kaisers Traianus (98-117) (MIR 14, Vienna, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Woman, Culture, and Law by Heather Faith Wright Senior Seminar
    Roman Woman, Culture, and Law By Heather Faith Wright Senior Seminar: HST 499 Professor John L. Rector Western Oregon University June 5, 2010 Readers Professor Benedict Lowe Professor Laurie Carlson Copyright @ Heather Wright, 2010 2 The topic of my senior thesis is Women of the Baths. Women were an important part of the activities and culture that took place within the baths. Throughout Roman history bathing was important to the Romans. By the age of Augustus visiting the baths had become one of the three main activities in a Roman citizen’s daily life. The baths were built following the current trends in architecture and were very much a part of the culture of their day. The architecture, patrons, and prostitutes of the Roman baths greatly influenced the culture of this institution. The public baths of both the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire were important social environment to hear or read poetry and meet lovers. Patrons were expected to wear special bathing costumes, because under various emperors it was illegal to bathe nude. It was also very important to maintain the baths; they were, at the top of the Roman government's list of social responsibilities. The baths used the current trends in architecture, and were very much a part of the culture of the day. Culture within the Roman baths, mainly the Imperial and Republican baths was essential to Roman society. The baths were complex arenas to discuss politics, have rendezvous with prostitutes and socialize with friends. Aqueducts are an example of the level of specialization which the Romans had reached in the glory days of the Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Who Built the Pantheon? Agrippa, Apollodorus, Hadrian And
    Despite so much that is known about Roman buildings, Chapter 3 there is relatively little to say about the individuals involved in the ferment of their creation. We can reconstruct Who Built the Pantheon? confidently the original appearance of many a monument, but not much about their designers. This is not for want of Agrippa, Apollodorus, information; it is just not quite of the right kind. All around the Mediterranean survive ample ruins, including some Hadrian and Trajan strikingly well-preserved buildings, of which the Pantheon is the prime example. This physical evidence is illuminated by literary sources, inscriptions and brickstamps, and on Mark Wilson Jones occasion by maps and drawings inscribed in stone. Notwithstanding some long-running disputes, we can often be sure of the identity and date of individual monuments in major cities. We also possess quite a populous roster of architects’ names, thanks to numbers of their tombstones, along with the occasional textual mention of a few of the men at the top of their profession. Some buildings bear discreet architects’ inscriptions, yet these are nothing like as numerous and prominent as those of their patrons; it is they who take the credit. In short, it is normally impossible to join up specific surviving buildings with specific architects about whom we know any more than the name. In this the Roman period fares worse than the Greek, when architects were frequently tied to particular projects by specifications, contracts and accounts recorded on stone, while the names of famous protagonists can be found in the treatises of Roman writers, most notably Vitruvius and Pliny.1 By such means we know of no fewer than three individuals who had responsibility for the design of the Parthenon in one role or other, Ictinus, Kallikrates and Karpion, while a fourth, Phidias, the creator of Athena Parthenos, may also have had some architectural input.
    [Show full text]
  • Horizontally Shifted and Vertically Superimposed Ancient Cities: Comparing Urban Histories of Chang’An and Rome1
    Athens Journal of History - Volume 2, Issue 2 – Pages 111-128 Horizontally Shifted and Vertically Superimposed Ancient Cities: Comparing Urban Histories of Chang’an and Rome1 By Meng-chi Hsueh This article compares the forming and transforming process of two grand ancient capitals, Chang’an and Rome. Chang’an had been chosen as the capital of ancient China for many occasions. Repeated relocation had left Chan’an with a series of former sites widely distributed. By contrast, the urban cores of Rome had never moved faraway but remained within a confined area. It is observed that the historic city of Rome tend to be superimposed vertically instead of being horizontally scattered like Chang’an. This paired intriguing phenomenon makes the researcher wonder why and how these differences were made in the two millennium-old cities’ urbanization process. This study delves into the cause and mechanism of their unique development manners by comparing site selection procedures and the temporal-spatial configuration of each city respectively. Three aspects of proposition have been identified as critical to the cause of such dissimilarities, namely ideological thinking, practical consideration, and construction materials. Introduction This article aims at comparing the formation and transforming process of two grand ancient capitals, Chang’an in China and Rome in Italy. Both of them have been used for more than two and a half millenniums, continuously, without complete abandonment but having their urbanized territory shrunk due to the decline of the respective empires. Both the two worldly famous and influential capitals have been the heart of great unified empires, which granted them symbolical importance in each civilization.
    [Show full text]
  • An Innovative Investigation of the Thermal Environment Inside the Reconstructed Caldaria of Two Ancient Roman Baths Using Computational Fluid Dynamics
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2013-01-18 An Innovative Investigation of the Thermal Environment inside the Reconstructed Caldaria of Two Ancient Roman Baths Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Oetelaar, Taylor Oetelaar, T. (2013). An Innovative Investigation of the Thermal Environment inside the Reconstructed Caldaria of Two Ancient Roman Baths Using Computational Fluid Dynamics (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/24900 http://hdl.handle.net/11023/435 doctoral thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY An Innovative Investigation of the Thermal Environment inside the Reconstructed Caldaria of Two Ancient Roman Baths Using Computational Fluid Dynamics by Taylor Anthony Oetelaar A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING CALGARY, ALBERTA JANUARY, 2013 © Taylor Anthony Oetelaar 2013 Abstract The overarching premise of this dissertation is to use engineering principles and classical archaeological data to create knowledge that benefits both disciplines: transdisciplinary research. Specifically, this project uses computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to analyze the thermal environment inside one room of two Roman bath buildings. By doing so, this research reveals the temperature distribution and velocity profiles inside the room of interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Monuments/Buildings Research
    Ms. Lardas/Ms. Despines/Ms. Rentschler May 2017 Monuments/Buildings Research Please consult ONLY the following website(s) for your monument/building to find the information needed for your assignment. Some include pictures, some do not. When finding pictures, make sure you use credible sources. For all pictures, be sure you include the web address underneath the picture that you put on the flashcard. 1. Aqua Claudia http://www.romanaqueducts.info/aquasite/romaclaudia/ 2. Aqua Marcia http://www.romanaqueducts.info/aquasite/romamarcia/ 3. Arch of Constantine in Rome http://www.ancient.eu/article/497/ http://penelope.uchicago.edu/~grout/encyclopaedia_romana/romanurbs/archconstantine.html Pictures here 4. Arch of Titus in the Roman Forum http://www.ancient.eu/article/499/ Circus Maximus in Rome http://www.ancient.eu/Circus_Maximus/ 5. Augustus' Altar of Peace in Rome http://www.ancient.eu/article/618/ 6. Augustan Rostra in the Roman Forum http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Gazetteer/Places/Europe/Italy/Lazio/Roma/Rome/_Te xts/PLATOP*/Rostra_Augusti.html 7. Basilica Aemelia in the Roman Forum http://sights.seindal.dk/sight/157_Basilica_Aemilia.html http://dlib.etc.ucla.edu/projects/Forum/reconstructions/BasilicaFulvia_1 Pictures here 8. Basilica Julia in the Roman Forum http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Gazetteer/Places/Europe/Italy/Lazio/Roma/Rome/_Te xts/PLATOP*/Basilica_Julia.html http://www.ancient.eu/article/24/ Pictures here 9. Baths of Trajan in Rome http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Gazetteer/Places/Europe/Italy/Lazio/Roma/Rome/_Te xts/PLATOP*/Thermae_Trajani.html 1 10. Curia Julia in the Roman Forum http://dlib.etc.ucla.edu/projects/Forum/reconstructions/CuriaIulia_1 11.Flavian Amphitheater http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Gazetteer/Places/Europe/Italy/Lazio/Roma/Rome/_Te xts/PLATOP*/Amphitheatrum_Flavium.html 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Volcanic Eruptions Damned the River with Deposits of Ash, Called Tuffs6
    volcanic eruptions damned the river with deposits of ash, called tuffs6, and changed its course. Both of the volcanic fields, the Sabatini to the northwest and the Alban hills to the southeast, played important roles in creating the terrain; plateaus pinching the Tiber floodplain and creating high ground for Rome (Heiken, Funiciello & De Rita, 2005:11). Despite the advantageous location, Rome is still susceptible to flooding due to the large drainage area of the Tiber. The climate from the end of the republic, throughout the years of the Empire, up to perhaps between 800 and 1200 A.D., was warmer and drier than later years. During the wet period between 1310 and 1320 A.D., and the so-called "little ice age" of 1500 to 1800 A.D., Rome was more susceptible to flooding (Lamb, 1995). This is perhaps a good thing, as repeated natural destruction of the city may have had a large influence on the superstitious Roman mind, providing "evidence" for the displeasure of the gods, and perhaps the resulting abandonment of the site. The Alban hills are approximately 50 kilometres in diameter with an elevation of nearly 1000 metres above sea level, and span the coastal plain between the Apennines and the sea. The summit is broad and dominated by a caldera, which has mostly been covered with material from later volcanoes. The slopes were once covered with oak, hazel and maple trees. Archaeolog- ical evidence from around the edges of the Nemi and Albano lakes indicate that the area has been occupied since the Bronze Age.
    [Show full text]
  • ROME and ENVIRONS the City of 19 ROME 20
    ROME AND ENVIRONS The City of 19 ROME 20 106 77 127 105 76 128 R 11 BE 104 TI 75 126 103 18 102 125 17 101 74 12 96 99 90 98 73 68 100 69 92 88 94 13 89 97 91 93 95 87 85 14 44 84 86 36 124 40 82 41 83 79 43 42 80 37 34 81 15 35 38 60 78 108 39 46 50 107 16 49 109 45 47 33 1 52 110 48 111 112 123 5 113 122 114 32 117 2 3 116 4 0 500 1000 m 118 115 121 31 120 119 30 THECITYOFROME 1 Porta Trigemina 60 Baths of Titus 2 Porta Lavernalis 61 Baths of Trajan 3 Porta Raudusculana 62 “Sette Sale” 4 Porta Naevia 63 Porticus Liviae 5 Porta Capena 64 Macellum Liviae? 6 Porta Caelimontana 65 Horti Maecenatis 21 7 Porta Querquetulana 66 Nymphaeum of 8 Porta Esquilina Alexander Severus 9 Porta Viminalis 67 “Temple of Minerva 22 10 Porta Collina Medica” 71 11 Porta Quirinalis 68 Temple of Serapis 12 Porta Salutaris 69 Baths of Constantine 101 13 Porta Sanqualis 70 Baths of Diocletian 72 14 Porta Fontinalis 71 Horti Sallustiani 15 Porta Carmentalis 72 Castra Praetoria 16 Porta Flumentana 73 Arcus Claudii and 17 Arcus Arcadi, Honorii, Aqua Virgo et Theodosii 74 Hadrianic insulae 18 Porta Cornelia 75 Temple of the Sun 23 19 Porta Flaminia 76 Arco di Portogallo 20 Porta Pinciana 77 Horti Luculliani Porta Salaria 78 Theater of Marcellus 70 21 9 22 Porta Nomentana 79 Temples of Apollo 23 “Porta Chiusa” and Bellona 24 Porta Tiburtina 80 Circus Flaminius 25 Porta Praenestina 81 Porticus of Octavia 26 Porta Asinaria 82 Porticus of Philippus 27 Porta Metrovia 83 Temple of Mars? 84 Largo Argentina 24 28 Porta Latina 29 Porta Appia 85 Porticus Minucia Frumentaria
    [Show full text]
  • Artificial Stone
    1 Excerpted from Daniel J. Boorstin, The Creators. New York: Random House, 1992, 107 – 126. Artificial Stone: A Roman Revolution "THE ancient Romans," Voltaire complained, "built their greatest masterpieces of architecture, the amphitheatre, for wild beasts to fight in." In this "enlightened" verdict on Roman architecture critics and historians have joined for the last thousand years. Vision of the ancient Roman creations had long been clouded by Vitruvius's idealizing of ancient Greece. The arts of Rome, like Roman civilization as a whole, have had a bad press. The title of Edward Gibbon's classic Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire has dominated literary imagination. Awed by the grand spectacle of so great a civilization disintegrating, we have thought too little about its rise and the creations that made it great. Western pundits have applauded Rome's decline. "1 know not why anyone but a school-boy," Dr. Johnson decreed, "should whine over the Commonwealth of Rome, which grew great only by the misery of the rest of mankind." "The barbarians who broke up the Roman empire," Ralph Waldo Emerson agreed, "did not arrive a day too soon." Still, Roman creations are among the most remarkable works of mankind. And their architecture remains their most original and most enduring contribution to the arts of the West. It is not so surprising that architects schooled in Vitruvius and the beauties of classic Greece have been slow to recognize the greatness of Roman architecture. For the beauties of classic Greece were revealed in the elegance of polished marble and survive with a charming patina.
    [Show full text]
  • Rome Reborn: 3D Digital Modeling and Publishing
    Rome Reborn: 3D Digital Modeling and Publishing BERNARD FRISCHER, Director, Institute for Advanced Technology in the Humanities (University of Virginia) MR.FRISCHER:I would like to begin by thanking the National Endowment for the Humanities for inviting me to participate in this important event and for giving me the opportunity to be here sharing the podium with such illustrious colleagues, one of whom inspired the project I will talk about; another of whom helped us as an advisor. The Institute for Advanced Technology in the Humanities (or, “IATH”) at the University of Virginia was founded in 1992 with the help of a major grant from IBM. From the start IATH’s mission has been to study new ways of applying information technology to research in the humanities. Each year we give one faculty member at the university, chosen through a competition process, a two-year grant which involves some course relief, modest funding, and a chance to collaborate with the 15 members of our staff to realize their digital dream. Our projects tend to involve preservation, access, interpretation, and discovery of new facts, ideas, or theories about the objects that humanists typically study, whether they be texts, poems, language, 2D objects like paintings, manuscripts, or 3D objects such as statues, buildings, and even whole cities. The projects of our current fellows run the gamut of humanities disciplines, from classics to religious studies, architecture and art history. It’s interesting to note that in recent years, more and more of our fellows’ projects have exemplified the “spatial turn” in humanities research.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes from Rome 2018-19
    ORE Open Research Exeter TITLE Notes from Rome 2018-19 AUTHORS Claridge, A; Siwicki, CS JOURNAL Papers of the British School at Rome DEPOSITED IN ORE 16 July 2019 This version available at http://hdl.handle.net/10871/37986 COPYRIGHT AND REUSE Open Research Exeter makes this work available in accordance with publisher policies. A NOTE ON VERSIONS The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication NOTES FROM ROME 2018-19 by Amanda Claridge and Christopher Siwicki This gazette presents to the reader outside Rome news of recent archaeological activity (in the second half of 2018 and the first half of 2019) gleaned from public lectures, conferences, exhibitions, and newspaper reports. Questa gazetta ha lo scopo di presentare ad un lettore fuori Roma notizie della recente attività archeologica (per la seconda metà del 2018 e la prima metà del 2019), tratte da conferenze, convegni, mostre e relazioni su giornali Via Alessandrina, once the major artery of a new quarter laid out in the valley of the imperial forums by Cardinal Michele Bonelli (1541-98) in the late sixteenth century, is soon to be no more. Its southern end and all the houses and shops that lined it were levelled in the 1930s to make way for the Via dell’Impero, leaving only the northward end, with a public park on one side, the other side overlooking the newly excavated hemicycle of Trajan’s Markets, the eastern porticus of the Forum of Trajan and the east ends of the Forums of Augustus and Nerva.
    [Show full text]
  • Entertainment in Ancient Rome 17
    Unit 3 Entertainment in ancient Rome 17 ENTERTAINMENT Unit 3 IN ANCIENT ROME . Leisure architecture The Romans took from the Greeks the three orders of architecture, Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian, based on the different forms of the column and the capital which MIND THE GAP surmounted it, and added a hybrid of their own, known as Composite. Its basis was pozzolana, a chocolate-coloured volcanic earth originally found near the Greek settlement of Puteoli, and subsequently discovered in vast quantities around Rome. Pozzolana was used to make mortar and also, when mixed with lime and strength- ening materials such as chips of rock and broken brick, concrete. Judicious use of bricks and concrete together enabled massive, permanent structures to be built. Once concrete had taken the place of rubble as the filling of a wall, it was possible to use irregularly shaped stones as facing, with courses of brick to bind it. With opus reticulatum square-based pyramids of stone were inserted with the heads facing inwards. A further development was opus testaceum, in which triangular baked bricks were used. [...] The main block of the Baths of Caracalla to the south-east of the city, which could accommodate 1,600 bathers at a time, was 216 by 112 metres. Roman archi- tects were less concerned with external appearances than with the creation of inner space, which the dome, where it was employed, enhanced. In their construction of public baths as luxury, cultural, leisure and sports centres, the Romans combined their passion for opulence with their flair for hydraulics. For their theatres, the Romans followed the Greek plan of tiers of seats in a semi- circle facing the stage, but whereas the Greeks tended to take advantage of natural slopes on which to erect the seats, Roman theatres were usually built on level ground.
    [Show full text]