DOCSLIB.ORG

Romans 1:13-17 Transitions from Proem to Letter Body

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BIC Volume 09 Romans Lorin L Cranford Letter Body-01: San Angelo, TX Topic 10.3.3-10.3.3.2.1.2.3 325 703 1664 [email protected] Rom. 1:16-32 © All rights reserved Quick Links to Study 10.3.3 Letter Body, 1:16-15:33 10.3.3.2.1.1.2 Defense of Declaration, 1:19b-23 10.3.3.1 Body Opening: the Gospel, 1:16-18 10.3.3.2.1.2 God’s Response to this Rejection, 1:24-32 10.3.3.2 The Gospel as God’s Righteousness, 1:18-4:25 10.3.3.2.1.2.1 God handed them over to uncleanness, 1:24-25 10.3.3.2.1 God’s Wrath against Human Sinfulness, 1:18-32 10.3.3.2.1.2.2 God handed them over to degrading passions, 1:26-27 10.3.3.2.1.1 God’s Wrath revealed but rejected, 1:18-23 10.3.3.2.1.2.3 God handed them over to a debased mind, 1:28-32 10.3.3.2.1.1.1 Basic Declaration, 1:18-19a THEOLOGICAL AND INTERPRETIVE OBSERVATIONS 10.3.3 Letter Body, 1:16-15:33 The determination of the boundaries of the letter body are Romans 1:13-17 somewhat challenging, particularly the beginning point. The travel plans section in 15:14-32 stand as a fairly typical ancient Transitions from Proem to Letter Body letter closing section coming at the close of the letter body and Letter Body helping to transition into the Conclusio segment. But consid- 1:16-17 erable difference of opinion exists regarding the beginning of Rom. 1:16-15:32 the letter body after to Proem section. As I argued above, my conviction is that seeking to define a clear beginning point re- 1:14-15 The bridge building tendencies of Jewish scribal writing flects modern western desires for precision. And the letter writ- techniques that Paul reects becomes challenging to many ing in Paul’s world shows much less concern for such precision. modern interpreters who desire clean breaks between sec- Proem 1:13 tion A and section B. Paul’s mind and the modern interpret- Add to that Paul’s scribal Jewish training where units of thought ers’ mind do not coincide with one another at all. One more often need to be linked together by connectors of some kind, Rom. 1:8-15 example of the dierence between then (Paul’s 1st century and one thus encounters a situation like in Rom. 1:13-17 where Praescriptio way of thinking) and now (modern western based thinking). small internal units form a transition from the Proem to the letter True exegesis is building understanding bridges between the two. Not imposing the now down on to the then. body as reflected in the ve chart. Rom. 1:1-7 Grammatically, the causal γὰρ conjunction repeated for both sentences in vv. 16-17 link this unit of text back to vv. 14- Page 1 15 as a conceptual how important for interpretation is the structural arrangement of ideas in foundation for the the biblical text. axiomatic principle What can be said then about any structural arrangement of ideas in of Paul’s sense of 1:18-5:13? First, let it be said that in Romans, more so than any other Pau- 1:8-12 ==> 1:13 ==> 1:14-15 ==> 1:16-17 indebtedness. But line letter, a traceable progression of thought surfaces from careful analy- also clearly, vv. 14-15 provide a conceptual basis for vv. 8-13. His prayer sis. It doesn’t fit any kind of western outline using a I., II., II kind of pattern. requests along with repeated earlier attempts to travel to Rome reflect his Thinking in any of the first century cultures that Paul had exposure to sim- thanksgiving for the witness of the Roman Christians. But all of this emerg- ply does not follow this kind of logic. es out of his sense of divine calling to preach the Gospel to the Gentiles. What we do encounter is the core concepts in 1:16-17 providing a Now in vv. 16-17 that sense of divine calling to preach the Gospel rests on launch pad for a large number of expansions stitched together very loose- the basis of what that Gospel message is and the pride in it that Paul pos- ly, and sometimes incoherently, over the remainder of the letter body. One sesses. Additionally, vv. 16-17 serve to set up the discussion of the Gospel should know that the four listings below under the general caption The that encompasses the rest of the letter body down through 15:33. So just Gospel as... will bunch together often more than one of these launch pad like a linked chain, each of the small units leads to the next unit in vv. 8-17. topics for the sake of keeping the posted units of commentary relatively The precise structure of 1:18-15:13 is also debated among modern equal in size. This periodic ‘spurting out’ of a new topic can drive a modern scholars. For most of the modern era until the last few decades, the older reader up the wall in trying to follow the apostle, simply because we crave dual division of doctrine (1:18-11:36) and practical (12:1-15:13) has dom- logical, smooth progression from section to section. And we’re not going to inated the understanding. Although highly questionable literarily, the influ- get that in the original Paul. For that pseudo-Paul you have to turn to many ence of this perspective has been enormous. Earlier commentators have of the post-enlightenment commentaries on Romans where what you actu- tried to make this twofold structure a template for virtually all of Paul’s let- ally get is the distorted thinking of the commentator, not Paul. My objective ters -- something utterly false and misleading. But beyond this the impact for this commentary is to explain to the best of my ability the original Paul of this twofold structure on theological training in seminaries and divinity and then seek to connect him up to modern thinking in the clearest manner schools for the past four hundred or so years is seen in the dividing of de- possible.1 Only then can the actual voice of Paul flow through this text into gree curriculum into a twofold division of ‘classical’ and ‘practical.’ Out of our Christian experience today. And it is solely through that authentic voice this has often come a priority on the classical / doctrinal over the practical. of Paul that the voice of God flows in inspiration to us today. To be sure distinct directions can be easily seen between theological edu- cation in North America and in Europe and the UK. But the dual structure is 10.3.3.1 Body Opening: the Gospel, 1:16-18 foundational to both sets of traditions. The so-called Practical Theological 16 Οὐ γὰρ ἐπαισχύνομαι τὸ εὐαγγέλιον, δύναμις γὰρ θεοῦ ἐστιν εἰς σωτηρίαν studies has generally struggled to gain recognition and anything close to παντὶ τῷ πιστεύοντι, Ἰουδαίῳ τε πρῶτον καὶ Ἕλληνι. 17 δικαιοσύνη γὰρ θεοῦ ἐν equal standing with the so-called classical studies side. Such impact sub- αὐτῷ ἀποκαλύπτεται ἐκ πίστεως εἰς πίστιν, καθὼς γέγραπται· ὁ δὲ δίκαιος ἐκ sequently shows up in much of church life where how one behaves is not πίστεως ζήσεται. nearly as important as what one believes. Of course, the clear teaching of 16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel; it is the power of God for salvation the New Testament flatly denies and condemns such understanding, as is to everyone who has faith, to the Jew first and also to the Greek. 17 For in it the seen in Jas. 2:14-16; Mat. 7:22-25 et als. Amazingly, the beginning root of righteousness of God is revealed through faith for faith; as it is written, “The one all of this lies in this very questionable early modern viewing of the struc- who is righteous will live by faith.” tural contents of the letter body of Romans. This should be a reminder of The internal structure of this pericope is clear from the above diagram. 1The many proposals made in recent times by commentators with orientation toward the literary side of ancient texts are interesting and often helpful, but most seem to impose too much of some modern methodology onto the text for the analysis. More balance in the methodology used is needed. This seems to be especially problematic for American commentators with a penchant for fadism. Thankfully not all are so oriented. From my observation, the more familiar the commentator is with literary patterns in the ancient world, along with ways of thinking in that world, the better the insights of the commentator. Page 2 Letter Body: θεὸς τῆς εἰρήνης μετὰ πάντων ὑμῶν, ἀμήν. And may the 1.16 γὰρ God of peace be with all of you, amen. Do you desire to 8 Οὐ ἐπαισχύνομαι τὸ εὐαγγέλιον, know the meaning of τὸ εὐαγγέλιον? Rom. 1:18-15:33 γὰρ gives you the most detailed explanation anywhere 9 δύναμις θεοῦ ἐστιν inside the NT. And this explanation is summarized in εἰς σωτηρίαν Rom. 1:1b-6 in anticipation of the letter body. παντὶ τῷ πιστεύοντι, Each of the three declarations needs to be carefully Ἰουδαίῳ τε πρῶτον examined since this pericope plays such a pivotal role καὶ Ἕλληνι.
Recommended publications
  • Faunus and the Fauns in Latin Literature of the Republic and Early Empire

    Faunus and the Fauns in Latin Literature of the Republic and Early Empire

    University of Adelaide Discipline of Classics Faculty of Arts Faunus and the Fauns in Latin Literature of the Republic and Early Empire Tammy DI-Giusto BA (Hons), Grad Dip Ed, Grad Cert Ed Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy October 2015 Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................... 4 Thesis Declaration ................................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................. 6 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 7 Context and introductory background ................................................................. 7 Significance ......................................................................................................... 8 Theoretical framework and methods ................................................................... 9 Research questions ............................................................................................. 11 Aims ................................................................................................................... 11 Literature review ................................................................................................ 11 Outline of chapters ............................................................................................
  • Volume 16 Winter 2014

    Volume 16 Winter 2014

    Volume 16 Winter 2014 Tomb 6423 At right, the Below is the A Digger’s View: lastra sealing chamber as The Tomb of the Hanging the chamber found at the The perspective of a field Aryballos, Tarquinia shown in situ. moment of archaeologist by Alessandro Mandolesi Above it is the opening, by Maria Rosa Lucidi another lastra on the back The University of Turin and the possibly reut- wall a little The discovery of the tomb of the Superintendency for the Archaeological ilzed spolia aryballos still “hanging aryballos" has aroused great Heritage of Southern Etruria have been interest among the public in both Italy taken from hangs on its investigating the Tumulus of the Queen and internationally. The integrity of the original nail. and the necropolis surrounding it, the the tumulus unviolated tomb is definitely one of the Doganaccia, since 2008. The excava- of the queen, (photographs reasons for the attention it has received. tions have brought forth many important which stands by Massimo The uniqueness is even more pro- and unexpected results, thanks to subse- nearby. Legni). nounced when one considers that since quent research, and the infor- the second half of the nine- mation relating to the differ- teenth century the English ent phases of its use has made traveler George Dennis it possible to clarify many blamed the inability to recov- obscure points about the great er the contexts from intact era of the monumental tumuli chamber tombs in Etruscan at Tarquinia. Tarquinia on repeated looting Archaeologists working since ancient times. The
  • "Goodly Woods": Irish Forests, Georgic Trees in Books 1 and 4 of Edmund Spenser's Færie Queene

    "Goodly Woods": Irish Forests, Georgic Trees in Books 1 and 4 of Edmund Spenser's Færie Queene

    Quidditas Volume 19 Article 5 1998 "Goodly Woods": Irish Forests, Georgic Trees in Books 1 and 4 of Edmund Spenser's Færie Queene Thomas Herron University of Wisconsin-Madison Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/rmmra Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, History Commons, Philosophy Commons, and the Renaissance Studies Commons Recommended Citation Herron, Thomas (1998) ""Goodly Woods": Irish Forests, Georgic Trees in Books 1 and 4 of Edmund Spenser's Færie Queene," Quidditas: Vol. 19 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/rmmra/vol19/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Quidditas by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. "Goodly Woods": Irish Forests, Georgie Trees in Books r and 4 of Edmund Spenser's Fterie Queene Thomas Herron University of Wisconsin-Madison Whilst vital/ sapp did make me spring, And leafe and bough didflourish brave, I then was dumbe and could not sing, N e had the voice which now I have: But when the axe my life did end, The Muses nine this voice did send. -Verses upon the earl of Cork's lute, attributed (ca. 1633) to Edmund Spenser y one estimate, Edmund Spenser's Irish lands would be CDworth £ro,ooo,ooo today, certainly enough money to write -n home about1-which is precisely what Spenser did. Spenser wrote, officiated, and farmed as the queen's troubled poet in Ireland. He hoped to convert one corner of the recently ravaged province of 'Calculated by John Bradley in "Anglicization and Spenser," a paper presented at the Rocky Mountain Medieval and Renaissance Association's Goodly Worlds: Places, Topoi, and Global Riches conference in Big Sky, Mon - tana, 3-7 June 1998.
  • Latin Derivatives Dictionary

    Latin Derivatives Dictionary

    Dedication: 3/15/05 I dedicate this collection to my friends Orville and Evelyn Brynelson and my parents George and Marion Greenwald. I especially thank James Steckel, Barbara Zbikowski, Gustavo Betancourt, and Joshua Ellis, colleagues and computer experts extraordinaire, for their invaluable assistance. Kathy Hart, MUHS librarian, was most helpful in suggesting sources. I further thank Gaylan DuBose, Ed Long, Hugh Himwich, Susan Schearer, Gardy Warren, and Kaye Warren for their encouragement and advice. My former students and now Classics professors Daniel Curley and Anthony Hollingsworth also deserve mention for their advice, assistance, and friendship. My student Michael Kocorowski encouraged and provoked me into beginning this dictionary. Certamen players Michael Fleisch, James Ruel, Jeff Tudor, and Ryan Thom were inspirations. Sue Smith provided advice. James Radtke, James Beaudoin, Richard Hallberg, Sylvester Kreilein, and James Wilkinson assisted with words from modern foreign languages. Without the advice of these and many others this dictionary could not have been compiled. Lastly I thank all my colleagues and students at Marquette University High School who have made my teaching career a joy. Basic sources: American College Dictionary (ACD) American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (AHD) Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology (ODEE) Oxford English Dictionary (OCD) Webster’s International Dictionary (eds. 2, 3) (W2, W3) Liddell and Scott (LS) Lewis and Short (LS) Oxford Latin Dictionary (OLD) Schaffer: Greek Derivative Dictionary, Latin Derivative Dictionary In addition many other sources were consulted; numerous etymology texts and readers were helpful. Zeno’s Word Frequency guide assisted in determining the relative importance of words. However, all judgments (and errors) are finally mine.
  • Adversus Gentes

    Adversus Gentes

    0200-0300 – Arnobius Afrus – Disputationum Adversus Gentes The Seven Books of Arnobius Against the Heathen (Adversus Gentes) this file has been downloaded from http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf06.html ANF06. Fathers of the Third Century: Gregory Thaumaturgus, Philip Schaff Dionysius the Great, Julius Africanus, Anatolius, and Minor Writers, Methodius, Arnobius ARNOBIUS. 403 [TRANSLATED BY ARCHDEACON HAMILTON BRYCE, LL.D., AND HUGH CAMPBELL, M.A.] 405 Introductory Notice TO Arnobius. ———————————— [A.D. 297–303.] Arnobius appears before us, not as did the earlier apologists, but as a token that the great struggle was nearing its triumphant close. He is a witness that Minucius Felix and Tertullian had not preceded him in vain. He is a representative character, and stands forth boldly to avow convictions which were, doubtless, now struggling into light from the hearts of every reflecting pagan in the empire. In all probability it was the alarm occasioned by tokens that could not be suppressed—of a spreading and deepening sense of the nothingness of Polytheism—that stimulated the Œcumenical rage of Diocletian, and his frantic efforts to crush the Church, or, rather, to overwhelm it in a deluge of flame and blood. In our author rises before us another contributor to Latin Christianity, which was still North-African in its literature, all but exclusively. He had learned of Tertullian and Cyprian what he was to impart to his brilliant pupil Lactantius. Thus the way was prepared for Augustine, by whom and in whom Latin Christianity was made distinctly Occidental, and prepared for the influence it has exerted, to this day, under the mighty prestiges of his single name.
  • The Religion of Ancient Rome

    The Religion of Ancient Rome

    The Religion Of Ancient Rome By Cyril Bailey THE RELIGION OF ANCIENT ROME CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION—SOURCES AND SCOPE The conditions of our knowledge of the native religion of early Rome may perhaps be best illustrated by a parallel from Roman archæology. The visitor to the Roman Forum at the present day, if he wishes to reconstruct in imagination the Forum of the early Republic, must not merely 'think away' many strata of later buildings, but, we are told, must picture to himself a totally different orientation of the whole: the upper layer of remains, which he sees before him, is for his purpose in most cases not merely useless, but positively misleading. In the same way, if we wish to form a picture of the genuine Roman religion, we cannot find it immediately in classical literature; we must banish from our minds all that is due to the contact with the East and Egypt, and even with the other races of Italy, and we must imagine, so to speak, a totally different mental orientation before the great influx of Greek literature and Greek thought, which gave an entirely new turn to Roman ideas in general, and in particular revolutionised religion by the introduction of anthropomorphic notions and sensuous representations. But in this difficult search we are not left without indications to guide us. In the writings of the savants of the late Republic and of the Empire, and in the Augustan poets, biassed though they are in their interpretations by Greek tendencies, there is embodied a great wealth of ancient custom and ritual, which becomes significant when we have once got the clue to its meaning.
  • Livy on the Founding of Rome

    Livy on the Founding of Rome

    Livy on the Founding of Rome Section on the Founding of Rome From Livy's History of Rome (1904), translated by John Henry Freese, Alfred John Church, and William Jackson Brodribb Founding of Rome Sections of Livy Book I Aeneas Leaves Troy To begin with, it is generally admitted that, after the taking of Troy, while all the other Trojans were treated with severity, in the case of two, Aeneas and Antenor, the Greeks forbore to exercise the full rights of war, both on account of an ancient tie of hospitality, and because they had persistently recommended peace and the restoration of Helen: and then Antenor, after various vicissitudes, reached the inmost bay of the Adriatic Sea, accompanied by a body of the Eneti, who had been driven from Paphlagonia by civil disturbance, and were in search both of a place of settlement and a leader, their chief Pylamenes having perished at Troy; and that the Eneti and Trojans, having driven out the Euganei, who dwelt between the sea and the Alps, occupied these districts. In fact, the place where they first landed is called Troy, and from this it is named the Trojan canton. The nation as a whole is called Veneti. It is also agreed that Aeneas, an exile from home owing to a like misfortune, but conducted by the fates to the founding of a greater empire, came first to Macedonia, that he was then driven ashore at Sicily in his quest for a settlement, and sailing thence directed his course to the territory of Laurentum. This spot also bears the name of Troy.
  • History of Rome (Ab Urbe Conditā)

    History of Rome (Ab Urbe Conditā)

    History Reading #4 – From Romulus to Brutus Livy – History of Rome (Ab Urbe Conditā) Book I – Rome Under the Kings PREFACE Whether the task I have undertaken of writing a complete history of the Roman people from the very commencement of its existence will reward me for thelabour spent on it, I neither know for certain, nor if I did know would I venture to say. For I see that this is an old‐established and a common practice, each fresh writer being invariably persuaded that he will either attain greater certainty in the materials of his narrative, or surpass the rudeness of antiquity in the excellence of his style. However this may be, it will still be a great satisfaction to me to have taken my part, too, in investing, to the utmost of my abilities, the annals of the foremost nation in the world with a deeper interest; and if in such a crowd of writers my own reputation is thrown into the shade, I would console myself with the renown and greatness of those who eclipse my fame. The subject, moreover, is one that demands immense labour. It goes back beyond 700 years and, after starting from small and humble beginnings, has grown to such dimensions that it begins to be overburdened by its greatness. I have very little doubt, too, that for the majority of my readers the earliest times and those immediately succeeding, will possess little attraction; they will hurry on to these modern days in which the might of a long paramount nation is wasting by internal decay.
  • The God of the Lupercal*

    The God of the Lupercal*

    THE GOD OF THE LUPERCAL* By T. P. WISEMAN (Plates I-IV) On 15 February, two days after the Ides, there took place at Rome the mysterious ritual called Lupercalia, which began when the Luperci sacrificed a goat at the Lupercal. There was evidently a close conceptual and etymological connection between the name of the festival, the title of the celebrants, and the name of the sacred place: as our best-informed literary source on Roman religion, M. Terentius Varro, succinctly put it, 'the Luperci [are so called] because at the Lupercalia they sacrifice at the Lupercal . the Lupercalia are so called because [that is when] the Luperci sacrifice at the Lupercal'J What is missing in that elegantly circular definition is the name of the divinity to whom the sacrifice was made. Even the sex of the goat is unclear - Ovid and Plutarch refer to a she-goat, other sources make it male2- which might perhaps imply a similar ambiguity in the gender of the re~ipient.~Varro does indeed refer to a goddess Luperca, whom he identifies with the she-wolf of the foundation legend; he explains the name as lupapepercit, 'the she-wolf spared them' (referring to the infant twins), so I think we can take this as an elaboration on the myth, and not much help for the rit~al.~ 'Lupercalia' is one of the festival days (dies feliati) that are named in large letters on the pre-Julian calendar. (Whether that list goes back to the early regal period, as Mommsen thought, or no further than the fifth century B.c., as is argued by Agnes Kirsopp Michels in her book on the Roman ~alendar,~it is the earliest evidence we have for the Lupercalia.) There are forty-two such names, of which thirty end in -alia; and at least twenty of those thirty are formed from the name of the divinity concerned -Liberalia, Floralia, Neptunalia, Saturna- lia, and so on.
  • Negation, Indefinites, and Polarity in Early Greek and Indo- Iranian: a Typological and Comparative Approach

    Negation, Indefinites, and Polarity in Early Greek and Indo- Iranian: a Typological and Comparative Approach

    UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID FACULTAD DE FILOLOGÍA TESIS DOCTORAL Negation, indefinites, and polarity in early Greek and Indo- Iranian: a typological and comparative approach (Negación, indefinidos y polaridad en griego antiguo e indo- iranio: un estudio tipológico y comparativo) MEMORIA PARA OPTAR AL GRADO DE DOCTOR PRESENTADA POR Juan Eugenio Briceño Villalobos Directores Juan Antonio Álvarez-Pedrosa Núñez Eugenio Ramón Luján Martínez Madrid © Juan Eugenio Briceño Villalobos, 2019 Programa de Doctorado de Estudios del Mundo Antiguo Facultad de Filología TESIS DOCTORAL Negation, indefinites, and polarity in early Greek and Indo-Iranian: a typological and comparative approach (Negación, indefinidos y polaridad en griego antiguo e indo-iranio: un estudio tipológico y comparativo) MEMORIA PARA OPTAR AL GRADO DE DOCTOR PRESENTADA POR Juan Eugenio Briceño Villalobos Directores Juan Antonio Álvarez-Pedrosa Núñez Eugenio Ramón Luján Martínez Madrid, 2019 For my parents, Gladys and Pedro, to whom I owe everything. Acknowledgements There is not enough space in several books to openly show my gratitude to all those who supported me through this long journey called “writing a dissertation” and thanks to whom I am writing right now these truly heart-felt words. I must say it has been a challenging journey, but nevertheless, fascinating. Thus, in spite of said handicaps, I will endeavor in this small section to enumerate all those who I believe deserve written mention, since, as the poet said, verba volant, sed scrīpta mānent. First thing first and with my parents’ excuse, I must first express my gratitude to that person who was literally there for me all the way from the start until the last word written in these pages.
  • [PDF]The Myths and Legends of Ancient Greece and Rome

    [PDF]The Myths and Legends of Ancient Greece and Rome

    The Myths & Legends of Ancient Greece and Rome E. M. Berens p q xMetaLibriy Copyright c 2009 MetaLibri Text in public domain. Some rights reserved. Please note that although the text of this ebook is in the public domain, this pdf edition is a copyrighted publication. Downloading of this book for private use and official government purposes is permitted and encouraged. Commercial use is protected by international copyright. Reprinting and electronic or other means of reproduction of this ebook or any part thereof requires the authorization of the publisher. Please cite as: Berens, E.M. The Myths and Legends of Ancient Greece and Rome. (Ed. S.M.Soares). MetaLibri, October 13, 2009, v1.0p. MetaLibri http://metalibri.wikidot.com [email protected] Amsterdam October 13, 2009 Contents List of Figures .................................... viii Preface .......................................... xi Part I. — MYTHS Introduction ....................................... 2 FIRST DYNASTY — ORIGIN OF THE WORLD Uranus and G (Clus and Terra)........................ 5 SECOND DYNASTY Cronus (Saturn).................................... 8 Rhea (Ops)....................................... 11 Division of the World ................................ 12 Theories as to the Origin of Man ......................... 13 THIRD DYNASTY — OLYMPIAN DIVINITIES ZEUS (Jupiter).................................... 17 Hera (Juno)...................................... 27 Pallas-Athene (Minerva).............................. 32 Themis .......................................... 37 Hestia
  • Sanskrit Roots of the English Language

    Sanskrit Roots of the English Language

    SANSKRIT ROOTS OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE A-, An-: not, without; << Skt. prefix (or upsarga) a- ( as in a-spasht, unclear, a- drishya, invisible, that which cannot be seen ) ) and an- ( as in an-achar, misbehavior, an-ant, endless, that which has no end, an-abhyas, without practice ) ) Derivatives: a-cephalous; a-cheira, a-chira; a-chondroplasia; a-gnostic, a-gnosia; a-gonic; a-graphia; a-mnesia; a-mnesty; a-moral; a-a- morphous; an-aerobe; an-algesic; an-alphabetic; an-archy; an-arthria; an-emia; an-esthesia; an-hidrosis; an-hydrous; an-ion; an-odyne; an- onym, an-onymous; an-ura; a-pathy; a-phagia; a-phasia, a-phasic; a-pnea; a-rgon; a-sbestos; a-sphyxia; a-sternal; a-stigmatism; a-sylum; a-syndeton; a-theist; a-tom; a-trophy. But Not - amoeba; ascetic; asparagus; astronomy; athlete; Anabaptist; anachronism; anagram. in- as in inin-cessant and un- as in un-developed cognate with a , aann a a and an seen in greek and in and un seen in latin and both gk and latin have taken from skt. a a or an asthenia. deuteranopia; hemianopia; protanopia; tritanopia, anis a a is alpha privative; analphabetic, alphabet, hybrid Abdomen: Ab-do-men, do <Skt. √ √dha, to hold, to support, to create. Abet: < Skt. √ √ bhid , to cleave; L. findere; Gm. bheid Accomplish: Ac-com-pl-ish,, adhi-sam-pur, ac- < ad-, ad- < Skt. Prefix adhi-, above, additional, upon; Skt. Sam, with, together, completely; Skt. √ √ pur, to fill as inin purna, -ish is a verbal suffix. acephalous – – without a head, as an organization, cephal <skt.