AGENDA REGULAR MEETING DESTIN CITY COUNCIL JULY 6, 2015 ANNEX COUNCIL CHAMBERS 6:00PM
**Core Value ofthe Month- Trust I Honesty I Integrizy**
CALL TO ORDER, INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 1. Proclamation- National Parks and Recreation Month APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2. Request approval of minutes of the June 15,2015 regular council meeting 3. Request approval of minutes of the May 15, 2015 council strategic visioning session PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. First reading of Ordinance 14-06-LC, which amends the Land Development Code by creating a new Section 18.05.00 Multimodal Mitigation Fee for off-site multimodal transportation improvements 5. First reading of Ordinance 15-03-LC, which amends the Land Development Code by updating the official name of the Destin Executive Airport and incorporating an updated aircraft noise zone map and noise zone descriptions PUBLIC OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK ON COUNCIL PROPOSITIONS CONSENT AGENDA* RESOLUTIONS COMMITTEE REPORTS SCHEDULED PRESENTATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC** 6. Legislative appropriation for the Heritage Run Subdivision ($500K) - Representative Matt Gaetz PROJECT REPORTS AND COMMENTS FROM MAYOR AND COUNCIL 7. Councilmember Trammell 8. Councilmember Wood 9. Councilmember Marler a. Traffic calming issues on Kelly Street 10. Councilmember Foreman a. Nomination of Ms. Joyce A. Humber to the Board of Adjustment 11. Councilmember Dixon 12. Councilmember Ramswell 13. Councilmember Braden 14. Mayor Ponder STAFF REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15. City Attorney comments 16. City Land Use Attorney comments 17. Friends of the Destin Dog Park fundraising and project update 18. Establishment of the FY 2016 tentative millage rate and budget hearing dates 19. City Manager comments COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE ADJOURNMENT *All items listed under Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and may be considered separately. **To be placed on the Agenda under scheduled presentations, citizens must contact the City Manager or City Clerk's office one (1) week prior to the scheduled City Council Meeting by completing a Speakers Request Form and providing any accompanying documentation as requested in the form's instructions. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Council with respect to any matter considered at this meeting, he/she may need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose, he/she may need to ensure that verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. FS 286.0105. Persons with disabilities who require assistance to participate in City meetings are requested to notify the City Clerk's Office at (850) 837-4242 in advance. Hearing Impaired: TTY: 711. Assistance also available through Human Resources, Title VI Coordinator, at (850) 837-4242. Personas con discapacidades que necesitan asistencia o personas que necesiten ayuda con un idioma para participar en las reuniones de la ciudad, deberan notificar la oficina de la Secretaria Municipal al (850) 837-4242 antes de la reunion. Discapacidad auditiva: TTY: 711 (Solicitar Espanol CA). La ayuda tambien esta disponible por Recursos Humanos, Coordinador del Titulo VI, al (850) 837-4242. €itp of lBe~tfn IJrotlamatfon Parks and Recreation Month
WHEREAS, parks and recreation programs are an integral part of communities throughout this country, including the City of Destin, Florida; and
WHEREAS, our parks and recreation are vitally important to establishing and maintaining the quality of life in our communities, ensuring the health of all citizens, and contributing to the economic and environmental well-being of a community and region; and
WHEREAS, parks and recreation programs build healthy, active communities that aid in the prevention of chronic disease, provide therapeutic recreation services for those who are mentally or physically disabled, and also improve the mental and emotional health of all citizens; and
WHEREAS, parks and recreation programs increase a community's economic prosperity through increased property values, expansion of the local tax base, increased tourism, the attraction and retention of businesses, and crime reduction; and
WHEREAS, parks and recreation areas are fundamental to the environmental well-being of our community; and
WHEREAS, parks and natural recreation areas improve water quality, protect groundwater, prevent flooding, improve the quality of the air we breathe, provide vegetative buffers to development, and produce habitat for wildlife; and
WHEREAS, our parks and natural recreation areas ensure the ecological beauty of our community and provide a place for children and adults to connect with nature and recreate outdoors; and
WHEREAS, the U.S. House of Representatives has designated July as Parks and Recreation Month and the City of Destin recognizes the benefits derived from parks and recreation resources; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED THAT I, Mayor Mel Ponder, on behalf of the Destin City Council, do hereby designate the month of July 2015 as Parks and Recreation Month in the City of Destin. We call upon park and recreation supporters to join us in recognizing the importance of our nation's parks and recreation.
SO DONE THIS 6TH DAY OF JULY 2015 By:
ATTEST: ~eiPonder,~ayor
Rey Bailey, City Clerk MINUTES REGULAR MEETING DESTIN CITY COUNCIL JUNE 15, 2015 CITY HALL BOARDROOM 6:00PM
The Council of the City of Destin met in regular session with the following members and staff present:
Destin City Council ~ayor~elPonder Councilmember Jim Wood Councilmember Rodney Braden Councilmember Jim Foreman Councilmember Cyron ~arler Councilmember Tuffy Dixon Councilmember Prebble Ramswell Councilmember Sandy Trammell
Destin City Staff City ~anager Greg Kisela City Clerk Rey Bailey City Planner Hank Woollard City Engineer David Campbell CRNDevelopment ~anager Steve Schmidt IT ~anager Webb Warren Community Development Director Ken Gallander Finance Director Bragg Farmer Land Use Attorney Scott Shirley HR ~anager Karen Jankowski City Attorney Jerry ~iller
CALL TO ORDER, INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
~ayor ~el Ponder called the meeting to order at 6:00 P~. Councilmember ~arler delivered the invocation; which was followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Request approval of minutes of the June 1, 2015, regular council meeting
Motion by Councilmember Wood, seconded by Councilmember Trammell, to approve the minutes of the June 1, 2015 regular council meeting passed 7-0 (Council members Trammell, Wood, Marler, Foreman, Dixon, Ramswell, and Braden voted ''yes")
2. Request approval of minutes of the June 1, 2015 executive session
Motion by Councilmember Wood, seconded by Councilmember Trammell, to approve the minutes of the June 1, 2015 execution session passed 7-0 (Council members Trammell, Wood, Marler, Foreman, Dixon, Ramswell, and Braden voted ''yes") 3. Request approval of minutes of the May 11, 2015 special council workshop
Councilmember Marler moved for approval of May 11, 2015 special council workshop; seconded by Councilmember Wood. Motion passed 7-0 (Council members Trammell, Wood, Marler, Foreman, Dixon, Ramswell, and Braden voted "yes")
PUBLIC HEARINGS PUBLIC OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK ON COUNCIL PROPOSITIONS CONSENT AGENDA* 4. Request approval to construct a single-family dock and boatlift I Josh Ullrich I Marine Construction
Councilmember Marler moved for approval of Consent Agenda item number 4, as printed above. Councilmember Wood provided a second to the motion, which passes 7-0 (Council members Trammell, Wood, Marler, Foreman, Dixon, Ramswell, and Braden voted "yes")
RESOLUTIONS COMMITTEE REPORTS SCHEDULED PRESENTATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC** 5. RFP 15-04-PS, Proposals for Civil Engineering Design and Construction Services for the City of Destin National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) Drainage Improvements a. Atkins North America, Inc. b. Preble-Rish, Inc. c. Volkert, Inc.
Atkins North America, Inc. provided the following Power Point presentation:
~ Full in-house services include •!• Engineering & stormwater Design •!• Land and utility surveying •!• Survey base mapping •!• R1W easement or acquisition assistance •!• Public meeting support •!• Preparation ofRIW and easement plats •!• Landscape architecture •!• Construction plans and specifications •!• Environmental science •!• State/federal permitting •!• Bidding services •!• Construction management or CE&I ~ More resources than any other firm in NW Florida with over 140 professionals ~ Performance record in NW Florida: References •!• Derrik Owens, City Engineer, Pensacola •!• Joy Blackmon, Escambia County Engineer
Page 2of 20 •!• Roger Blaylock, Santa Rosa County Engineer •!• Katherine Burke, Leon County Engineer •!• Tommy Barfield, FDOT District 3 Secretary •!• John Alaghemand, PE, Assistant City Manager/CRA Manager, Panama City Beach •!• Greg Graham, Project Manager, Walton County •!• Michael Scheinkman, FDEP, Nonpoint Source Manager };> Federal Grants - Construction Assistance •!• Atkins has a diverse CE&I team just for NW Florida projects •!• Phil LeGrand and Rick Smith live in Okaloosa County (municipal work) •!• We have a CE&I office in Freeport •!• Experienced with federal grants and LAP projects •!• Certified Threshold Inspectors };> Recent Projects •!• SW Sports Complex ($1 0.2 M) (LOST) •!• Pensacola Technology Campus ($2.6 M) (EDA) •!• Bayfront Parkway Landscape Project ($250,000) •!• Mahogany Mill Boat Ramp ($5 M) (NRDA) •!• Blue Springs Stormwater Project (FEMA) •!• US 331 from Choctawhatchee Bridge to SR 20 (27.8 mil) (Fed/State funds) •!• Gaberone Swamp Drainage Improvements ($580,000) (FEMA) };> Previous City Work (within 3 years) •!• Destin Crosstown Connector- in progress };> Relationships and Permitting Experience •!• Key Agency Relationships • FDEP • NWFWMD • FWC • USFWS • USACE • EPA • NFWF • USDA • NOAA •!• Kelly Samek- NFWF Coordinator for Florida •!• Phil Coram- FDEP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Coordinator •!• Michael Scheinkman, FDEP, Nonpoint Source Manager •!• Lee Marchman, FDEP State Stormwater Engineer };> Similar Work- Stormwater Experience •!• Government Street Stormwater Pond •!• Bill Gregory NFWF Application (Funded under Bayou Chico NFWF) •!• Ramblewood Residential Flooding •!• Escambia County SW Sports Complex •!• Admiral Mason Park Pond •!• Gaberonne Swamp Pond
Page 3 of 20 •!• Manolete Drainage Study and Design •!• Front Beach Road Drainage •!• US 331 Stonnwater Ponds •:• Innerarity Point •:• Longhollow Drainage Study •:• Aragon Drainage Study •:• Blue Springs Crescent Lake Drainage Analysis •:• Carpenters Creek Drainage Study •!• April2014 Post- Storm Flood Event Evaluation-Walton County );.> Similar Work Government Street Pond at Corinne Jones Park •!• 1st NFWF Storm water Design Project in Florida •:• Prepared Grant Application •:• Designed and Prepared Construction Plans •:• Bidding next week );.> Project Requirements •!• Design Features • Exfiltration Beds/Dry Retention Ponds • Swales (grassed) • Hydrodynamic Separators (Vortech, Baysavr, CDS, Stormceptor) •!• Operation and Maintenance • 25-year effective service life • Maintenance requirements and testing • Operation and maintenance plan will be prepared during design and permitting );.> Keys to Success •!• Work with property owners to meet the goals and objectives •!• Initial concept plan are critical •!• Meetings with public more critical than accelerating schedule •!• No do and re-do );.> Why Atkins? •!• Extensive Stormwater Design Resume •!• Great Relationships •!• Already designed the first NFWF project in Florida
DISCUSSION:
Councilmember Ramswell asked whether the 25-year effective service life expectation applies to any outfalls or drainage system
The finn replied affirmatively; stating this is the minimum effective service life expectation for the water management district in the City of Destin. They added everything should be designed to last at least 25 years.
Councilmember Ramswell asked if the finn has quality control process in place.
Page4of 20 The firm stated that they go through a rigid quality control procedure, with checks and balances throughout the process; adding if selected, the first thing they would do is submit their quality control plan for the City.
Councilmember Foreman expressed that one of his main concerns is finding a place to drain the storm water. He stated the City had gone through periods where they had excessive amounts of rain; particularly two years ago when people were draining in to the sewage system, which could have caused an overflow of the sewage plant and created an environmental impact.
The firm noted they have certain locations in mind; and that they would coordinate this matter closely with the City Engineer.
Councilmember Wood asked who has traffic maintenance responsibility.
The firm stated they would put together maintenance of traffic plan and would coordinate closely with the City with regards to work hours; especially in residential areas to minimize any inconveniences.
Councilmember Wood asked if the firm has LEED certified engineers; to which the finn replied affirmatively.
Councilmember Braden remarked he would not be in favor of tearing up and then redoing the swales on Kelly Street, as this would be quite inconvenient to residents.
The firm replied this would be their last alternative; adding their first option would be to tie in to existing drainage system. ****
Preble-Rish, Inc. provided the following Power Point presentation:
}> Scope ofWork •:• Indian Bayou Subdivision: The project will establish a roadside swale system to provide treatment for shallow aquifer recharge prior to discharge into Indian Bayou and replace deteriorated storm sewer piping •:• Sandalwood Drive: The project would construct swales and an exfiltration system to provide stonnwater treatment. Inlet boxes to the exfiltration system will have sediment traps to provide additional treatment and recharge into the shallow aquifer •:• Spring Lane and Whippoorwill A venue: The project would construct swales to capture and detain with percolation the first flush of runoff. It also would repair the existing culvert between Spring Lake and Joe's Bayou. Purchase of an adjacent parcel may be needed if the separator cannot be installed in the right of way •:• Juanita Drive and Snapper A venue: The project would construct a series of swales to capture and detain with percolation the first flush of runoff. A
Page 5 of 20 hydrodynamic separator would be installed to provide additional treatment to remove debris and sediments in the runoff prior to discharge into Spring Lake and Joe's Bayou. Purchase of an adjacent parcel may be needed if the separator cannot be installed in the right-of-way •!• Maltezos Street: The project would construct a series of swales to capture and detain with percolation the first flush of runoff and recharge into the shallow aquifer •!• Calhoun A venue: The project would construct a series of swales to capture and detain with percolation the first flush of runoff and recharge into the shallow aquifer prior to discharge into the Choctawhatchee Bay ~ Capabilities of Firm/Ability of Personnel •!• Established in 1991 as a 3 person firm •!• Firm has a total of 110 employees •!• Firm employs professional engineers, licensed surveyors, environmental scientists and FDOT certified inspectors •!• Firm has continuing contracts with 17 counties and 25 towns and cities and 4 school districts in Northwest Florida and South Alabama •!• Joe A. Rector, Jr. PLS- Vice-President/Regional Manager • 30 years of project management experience with engineering and surveying projects • Professional land surveyor • GSWCC level II plan reviewer • GIS certification • Local planning agency chairman • Similar project management experience: o Leon County - 18 square miles Lake Iamonia Master Drainage Study o Okaloosa County - Foxwood Subdivision Drainage Improvements •!• Clifford L. Knauer, PE - Sr. Vice President/Principal • 25 years of project management experience with engineering and surveying projects • · Professional engineer • Florida Engineering Society • Construction Institute - ASCE • Similar project management experience: o Walton County- FEMA Disaster Repairs o Okaloosa County- NRCS Emergency Watershed Protection Program •!• Cameron Morris - Environmental Manager • 10 years of project management experience with environmental projects • B.S. Ecology • M.S. Civil Engineering • Biological Sampling • Non-point source sediment reduction
Page6 of 20 • Similar project management experience: o Okaloosa County: Yellow River Watershed Threats Assessment o U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Road-Stream Crossing Threats Assessment •!• Malcom D. Williams, III Project Manager/Regionals Manager • 20 years of project management experience with engineering and storm water projects o Experience in City of Destin o Familiar with NWFWMD requirements • Similar project management experience: o Leon County: FSU Master Stormwater Plan Implementation o City of Destin: Old Bay Village Phase 2 );> Furnish services within budget and time •!• Understanding of time and budget constraints •!• Work Load Distribution Across 10 offices •!• 11 0 experienced professional in Panhandle •!• Full service team "one stop shop" with all required disciplines );> Grant Construction Assistance •!• Current work with NFWF • Coastal Dune Lakes restoration • Choctawhatchee Bay Watershed - Road-Stream Crossing Threats Assessment );> Previous City Work •:• Firm currently has 46 continuing contracts •:• Firm currently has contracts with 17 counties and 25 towns •!• Example team member experience in the City of Destin • Commons Drive West- As-Built • Destin Water Uses Admin Building • Old Bay Village Phase 1 • Old Bay Village Phase 2 • Marbella Phase 1 • Harbor lights • The Estates at Indian Point • Destin Elementary • Sibert Palms Townhomes • Beach Community Bank );> Similar Work •:• Federal • Chipola River Cut-off • Baggetts Streambank Stabilization and Culvert Replacement • Oyster Lake Outfall Improvements •!• State (FL) • Battery Park Storm water • Baltzell Stormwater • Ecofina Creek Water Management Area
Page7 of 20 •!• County • Okaloosa County NRCS Emergency Watershed Protection • Walton County NRCS Emergency Watershed Protection • Escambia County NRCS Emergency Watershed Protection •!• Municipal • To\VI'l of Cinco Bayou Glenwood Outfall • City ofBlountsto\VIl );> This is Why! •!• Capabilities ofFinn/Ability ofPersonnel • All local in-house staff with similar project experience in all required disciplines •!• Performance Record • References from clients showing excellent multi-discipline expertise and satisfaction with delivery •!• Furnish sCIVices within budget & time • Proven methods for budget tracking and using local talent to perform on projects •!• Grant Construction Assistance • Over $200 million in local grant assistance and administration •!• Previous City Work • Staff has experience in City of Destin and relationships with City of Destin staff •!• Similar Work • Firm has performed services on several similar federal, state (FL), county, municipal projects in the local vicinity
DISCUSSION:
Councilmember Foreman asked how the firm will prepare the neighborhood for the work they will undertake if they are selected for this project.
The firm stated they would try to inform every one of the project schedules; and that they usually set up a website for the impacted neighborhood where residents could pose questions and receive answers, and they could also see their neighbors' questions and the responses to these questions.
Councilmember Braden suggested that if selected, the firm should become aware of all the City's upcoming projects in the area so they can coordinate their plans accordingly and not create a conflict and have to tear up the streets twice.
The firm stated that if they are selected for this project they would coordinate all their construction activities with the City and try to prioritize them.
Councilmember Ramswell asked what sorts of warrantee or effective sCIVice life expectancy can the firm offer with the work they will be doing in teims of piping and other aspects of the project. She also asked who has maintenance responsibility once the project is completed.
Page So£ 20 The finn stated that the type of systems involved in this project are a combination of open swales, exfiltration and treatment boxes. They explained that treatment boxes require periodic maintenance, but maintenance schedule will not be known until they are actually in to operation. They also stated the City should not have to provide additional maintenance for open swales. The landowners should continue to maintain them the majority of the time, and so they need to be constructed in such a fashion that someone with a push mower can mow them. They further stated the exfiltration system will also require periodic maintenance, as they are heavily dependent on the amount of sediments or debris that enters it; adding they always try to design the exfiltration system, and use some sort of skimmer, that would prevent sediments from going right in to the exfiltration system.
Councilmember Ramswell asked what method of treatment the finn typically uses for this type of project.
The firm replied they typically use two different methods - open swales and exfiltration. The exfiltration only works in areas with fairly deep groundwater table. The majority of the areas in the City that are having these problems have a ground water table that mounds up after a long period of consistent rain. The areas where they could use exfiltration will be very limited. The majority of this project will be open swales.
Councilmember Ramswell inquired as to the finn's quality control process.
The firm stated they have adopted a quality control plan where the design engineers report to a review team; and that as they get a 30, 60, and 90 percent set of plan, they would conduct an internal review with a different group of engineers and then review the plan with the client. ****
Volkert provided the following Power Point presentation:
);- Introduction of Key T earn Members: •!• Shawn Justice, PE- Principal-in-Charge 20 years of experience •!• Scott Golden, PE - QAIQC Manager 26 years of experience •!• Michael Warnke, PE Project Manager- 19 years of experience •!• Justin O'Donnell, PE- Drainage Design 14 years of experience •!• Scott Rosenheim, PSM- Survey/ROW Mapping- 30 years of experience •!• Fred Brown, PE CEI- 25 years of experience );- Capabilities of Firm •!• Established in 1925 •!• 2015 ENR Ranking #98 out of top 500 design firms •!• Comprehensive In-House Team • Volkert can provide all of the required services required for the City of Destin National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) Drainage Improvements Project, but in the interest of teaming with other local consulting firms and budgetary constraints, we had proposed to team
Page 9of 20 with Jenkins Engineering on this project to provide surveytng services • Project completed through our Pensacola office and newly established Panama City Beach office ~ Volkert Services •:• Transportation • Roadways • Bridges/Structures • Drainage Design • Corridor Studies • Traffic Studies • Bridge Inspection • Signalization Plans •:• Survey •:• Water/Wastewater •:• Construction Services • CEI • Construction Management • Program Management • Construction Quality Control • Quality Assurance •:• Design Build • Design • CEI • Quality Assurance/Quality Control •:• Real Estate • Property Acquisition • Relocation Assistance • Appraisal •:• Environmental • NEP A Documentation • Wetland Delineation/Creation • Noise/Air Quality Studies • Site Assessments • Permitting •:• Electrical • Lighting/Security •:• Ports • Permits • Design • Environmental •:• Federal ~ Performance Record •:• Volkert received the State ofFlorida "Governor's Savings Award" in 2013 •:• Implementation of bold and innovative cost-saving business practices ~ Client Recommendations:
Page 10 of 20 •:• Drainage and Roadway Improvement Project for the City of Daphne, Alabama: • Design and CEI services o "Completed on time and within budget" o "Highly regarded, consulting engineering firm capable of fulfilling general engineering services for local municipalities" •:• City of Foley Recommends Volkert for Drainage Improvement: • " ... after the sidewalks and drainage inlets had been installed on the first street, the residents were able to see the benefits ofthe project. " • " ... we have received numerous positive comments from project area residents ... " ~ Furnish Services Within Budget & Time •:• Full service engineering firm • Over 800 employees corporate-wide •:• Committed to the City of Destin on this project • Project will be performed from local Pensacola office • Staff and resources available to begin immediately upon notice to proceed •:• Proven History with Our Clients of Projects Completed On-time and Within Budget ~ Grants Construction Assistance •:• Experience with Grant Funded Projects: • Transportation Investment Generation Economic Recovery (TIGER) Grants • FDOT Transportation Regional Inventive Program (TRIP) • Alabama Transportation Rehabilitation and Improvement Program (ATRIP) • Community Inventive Grant Program (CIGP) • Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) •:• In 2013 - $30 Million in Grant Funds Received for Local Government Clients Along the Gulf Coast • We understand the needs and processes in pursuing grant funding for drainage improvement projects ~ Previous City Work •:• Destin Community Center in Destin, Florida for the City of Destin (1991- 1993) $1.6 million approximate cost • The 18,600 square-foot multi-use facility was the first capital outlay project developed by the City of Destin after incorporation. Volkert was responsible for all design and construction observation duties. The project was completed three months ahead of schedule and $140,000 under budget ~ Previous Work Within the City •:• Bridge Rehab for SR 30 (US 98) Bridge over East Pass in Destin, Florida for FDOT (2005-1 020)
Page 11 of 20 •:• Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study on SR 30 (US 98) from the East Pass Bridge to the Emerald Coast Parkway in Okaloosa County, Florida (1993-2000) ~ Similar Work •:• Design Services for Widening & Drainage Improvements on CR 297 A from the north end of the Escambia County Road Prison (ESCRP) to Muscogee Road; Escambia County, Florida •:• Stillbrook Road Drainage Improvements; Escambia County, Florida •:• Captain O'Neal Drive and Dryer Avenue Street Reconstruction in Daphne, Alabama for the City of Daphne •:• 5th Street Drainage Improvements for the City of Gulf Shores •:• Chimney Pines SID upgrades for Escambia County Commission •:• 10-Mile Creak Stream Stabilization for Escambia County Commission •:• Crescent Lake Dam Restoration Project for Escambia County Commission ~ Why Volkert? •:• Experienced and Multi-disciplinary • Our in-house team can provide all of the services required under this contract •:• Proven knowledge of construction phase grant administration for federal and state grant funding projects •:• Local Firm • All services will be performed through our Pensacola and Panama City Beach offices
DISCUSSION:
Councilmember Trammell inquired as to the extent of the firm's involvement with the Destin Community Center project.
The firm noted they did the complete design and construction observation on this project.
Councilmember Trammell inquired as to the extent of the firm's involvement with the US 331 projects.
The firm replied they are involved with the bridge portion of the project.
Councilmember Ramswell asked what sort of checks and balances and quality control process the firm has in place.
The firm remarked they put a lot of emphasis on the conceptual design or the "big picture" design that goes into a project; adding they have an excellent quality control and quality assurance program making sure the storm water gets treated and the flooding gets medicated.
Councilmember Ramswell asked how maintenance intensive are the treatment the firm will be using, and what could the City expect in terms of a warrantee or any sort of follow-up maintenance from the firm.
Page 12of 20 According to the finn, the exfiltration systems are designed to last at least 25 years; however, they are the last resort. The swales systems will be the finn's first option as they are much more easily maintained and work just as well if not better.
Councilmember Wood asked about the finn's public involvement process with regards to the project.
The finn stated they would identify the stakeholders, which are usually the residents within so many feet of the boundary area of the study, and have a face to face dialogue with them at an introductory leveL They would then move on to a more formal public involvement process so that any issues or concerns are heard, vetted and understood. They also stated they find this type of communication with residents very important in order to establish where flooding are occurring and to be able to determine the best way the finn can remedy the problem. They would also provide work schedules so people are aware of what is going on and know what to expect.
Councilmember Wood asked how the finn plans to handle maintenance of traffic.
The finn stated they always consider both the pedestrian and vehicular traffic in the neighborhood; adding that simple cones and appropriate signage for daytime work and overnight barricade should be good enough in restoring and protecting the work zones.
Councilmember Trammell asked whether it was part of the firm's plan when meeting with affected residents and property owners to give them other alternatives such as the type of fertilizers to use on their lawns that would give them similar outcome and help prevent some of the problems that are occurring in their area.
The firm stated that part of their environmental involvement is to not only educate the residents but to be able to communicate with them best management practices as they relate to how they care for their property and how water quality is impacted in this case; as well as how residents can participate in the overall water quality effort . ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• At this time, the Mayor asked the City Council members to score and rank the firms using the "City Council Rating Form'' provided by staff, and then present the forms to the City Clerk who will then tally the scores.
The City Clerk provided the results of the scoring to the City Council.
Mayor asked for a motion from the City Council.
Councilmember Foreman moved to authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a professional services agreement with the top ranked firm of Preble--Rish, Inc. for professional consulting engineering services for the Gulf Environmental Benefit Fund Improvements project. Councilmember Ramswell provided a second to the motion. Motion
Page 13of 20 passed 7-0 (Council members Trammell, Wood, Marler, Foreman, Dixon, Ramswell, and Braden voted "yes").
PROJECT REPORTS AND COMMENTS FROM MAYOR AND COUNCIL
6. Councilmember Braden
Councilmember Braden asked how things are progressing with their efforts to repair the fencing at the Morgan Sport Center ballparks.
The City Manager noted that replacing the fencing at the Morgan Sports Center will be incorporated into the FY 21 06 Capital Improvement Projects.
Councilmember Braden asked when they could expect to finalize the jet ski/pontoon boat count on the harbor.
The City Manager stated they expect to have all reconciliations completed for all the different parcels within the next few weeks.
Councilmember Braden reported some water leakage coming from underneath the road at the west end of Kelly Street.
According to the City Manager, there was an abandoned service line that developed underneath the road, and that the Destin Water Users terminated it at the main and subsequently patched the holes.
7. Councilmember Ramswell
Councilmember Ramswell asked staff to look into the Festive Market Place open container boundary issue; and then for Council to discuss the possibility of re-drawing the area's boundaries so that alcohol is only allowed on the boardwalk itsel£
8. Councilmember Dixon 9. Councilmember Foreman
Councilmember Foreman distributed copies and briefly discussed the minutes of the June 5, 2015 Okaloosa County Transit Cooperative meeting he recently attended.
10. Councilmember Marler 11. Councilmember Wood 12. Councilmember Trammell 13. Mayor Ponder
Page 14of 20 STAFF REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14. City Attorney comments a. Assignment of City Attorney contract
The City Attorney announced that effective July 1, 2015 he will no longer be affiliated with Pleat, Perry & Ritchie, P A. He will be returning to practice at the previous location at 415 Mountain Drive where he had an office for 25 years. He asked that the contract for municipal services be assigned to his new firm which he had incorporated. He then circulated copies of a proposed motion to that effect.
Councilmember Trammell moved for approval of the assignment of the Agreement for municipal legal service, dated September 23, 2010, between the City of Destin and Pleat, Perry & Ritchie, P.A. to J. Jerome Miller, Chartered, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute and deliver the assignment and replacement agreement with J. Jerome Miller, Chartered, for municipal legal services and J. Jerome Miller to continue as City Attorney for the City of Destin. Councilmember Ramswell provided a second to the motion, which passes 7-0 (Council members Trammell, Wood, Marler, Foreman, Dixon, Ramswell, and Braden voted ''yes").
15. City Land Use Attorney comments 16. Finalized FDOT US 98 Safety Assessment Report
Florida Department of Transportation District (FDOT) Design Engineer Jared Perdue provided the following Power Point presentation on the finalized US 98 Safety Assessment Report:
~ Purpose of the Study •:• The study focused on ways to enhance /safety" • For pedestrians • For bicyclists • For motorists • For the whole community •:• Evaluate and recommend enhancements that can be implemented within the limits of the existing corridor to increase the overall safety for the community •:• Identify enhancements that can be implemented through partnership and cooperation between the Department, City Administration and local stakeholders •:• Create a safer environment for all users along US 98 through Destin ~ Corridor Overview •:• Urban Four Lane Divided Roadway • Four - 12 foot lanes • Sidewalk along both sides of the roadway • Raised median with landscaping or grass • Six signalized intersection
Page 15 of 20 • Four un-signalized mid-block crosswalks •!• Access Management • High number of median crossovers • High concentration of driveways );- Study Activities - 4 step process •!• Crash Analysis •!• Road Safety Audit (RSA)
•!• Corridor Analysis •!• Recommendations );- Recommendations •!• Maintenance •!• Education, Awareness and Enforcement •!• Augmentation to Existing Features •!• Proposed Enhancement to the Corridor • Proven Countermeasures (FHWA) • Access Management •!• Innovative Enhancements );- Recommendations - Short Term •!• Trim landscaping encroaching pass the back of sidewalk to maintain full width of sidewalk •!• Coordinate with adjacent property owners to position irrigation heads from spraying onto the sidewalk •!• Trim tree limbs covering roadside signs to increase visibility );- Recommendations Mid-Term •!• Replace all curb ramps and sidewalk along the corridor to current criteria •!• Install/relocate mid-block crosswalks •!• Replace existing 6' sidewalk with 10' sidewalk in select locations •!• Construct a right turn lane at the parking garage entrance at the Emerald Grand Condominiums );- Recommendations - Long-Term •!• Construct access management changes • Directional median openings • Close median openings • Pedestrian channelization •!• Widen roadway for bike lanes and add wider sidewalks (require additional RIW) •!• Construct alternate pedestrian access • Harbor Walk extension • Analyze pedestrian underpass/overpass • Construct alternate route through Destin );- Upcoming US 98 Resurfacing Project •!• FDOT resurfacing project on US 98 from the East Pass bridge to Airport Road • Design will begin in the Fall of2015 • No RIW phase currently planned
Page16of 20 • Construction tentatively planned for FY 2018 ~ Upcoming US 98 Resurfacing Project •!• Recommendations from safety assessment that may be considered: • Four signalized pedestrian crossings • Right turn lane into Harbor Walk Village • Median enhancements • Construct "No Turn on Red" signs for right turn movements on SB Stahlman A venue, Benning Drive, and Beach Drive • ADA improvements • Relocatedllmproved signage along corridor ~ Implementation of Remaining Recommendations •!• Prioritization of improvements by Okaloosa-Walton TPO •!• Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) funding •!• Local government initiatives
Following the presentation, the Mayor opened the floor for discussion.
Councilmember Braden asked for definition of mid-block crossings and their general locations.
Mr. Perdue explained that a mid-block crossing is a marked crosswalk on the roadway that has uncontrolled vehicular approaches; or there are no regulatory devices that stop vehicles when a pedestrian steps out in to the crosswalk. He continued they can be located in any number of places, but ideally, they need to be in the best location to avoid conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians. They would not want a mid-block crossing going straight through a median opening as there are a lot of conflicting movements in a median opening.
Councilmember Braden asked why Marler Parking Lot was not mentioned in the study.
Mr. Perdue explained that FDOT is quite familiar with the City's ongoing effort with the Marler Parking Lot, and that they do not want to overlap this effort. However, FDOT is ready to step in if the City's effort does not come to fruition.
Councilmember Marler noted that short term recommendations did not include a previous suggestion to lower the speed limit on Hwy 98 from 35 mph to 25 mph. He stated he believes lowering the speed limit would enhance safety.
Mr. Perdue noted that research has shown time and time again posted speed limits do not control the speed that motorists drive; and that 85 percent of motorists driving the corridor will drive the speed with which they are comfortable. He added that speed studies they have conducted within the district verified these findings.
Councilmember Foreman noted a metal fence that goes down the median in front of the Florida State College at Tennessee Street in Tallahassee where motorists are not allowed to cross. He asked if similar fencing can be utilized in Destin.
Page 17 of 20 Mr. Perdue stated it is something the City can consider requesting; however Tennessee Street in Tallahassee is a similar corridor but there is greater spacing between medians so there are opportunities to install channelization in a very wide already grassed median. In contrast, medians on Hwy 98 in Destin are very closely spaced and channelization becomes very difficult when they are trying to manage existing access.
Councilmember Dixon noted there are several different features of pedestrian crossings in the City of Destin. Some are just signs, some are signs with lights, and some have flashing signs to designate crosswalk. He suggests making all the crosswalks consistent so everybody understands the rules; and to find a way to make motorists understand they should stop at any crosswalks to allow pedestrians to go across.
Councilmember Trammell stated that the report did not address narrowing the lanes. She asked if 12 foot lanes are still being considered.
Mr. Perdue stated the safety assessment report did not specifically address lane widths; however, there are opportunities to look at narrowing the lanes in some sections of the road. He continued they would need to coordinate with City staff because they are very interested to know exactly the City's expectations so they could start looking at this and other issues and find solutions.
Councilmember Ramswell asked since it was reported that improvements has to be data driven and shown as critical in order to be eligible, what types of improvements would qualify and who actually make the suggestions.
Mr. Perdue explained that "data driven" means actually reviewing the crash history and finding out exactly what is causing the issue, and then looking at the cost of improvement to mitigate that issue. He continued they generate cost analysis, and they have a very rigid set of guidelines with regards to eligible safety improvements. He also stated that "suggestions" are actually engineering recommendations that are actually coming from engineering study conducted by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Florida. He added this safety assessment report basically looked at holistic view of the crashes on this particular corridor and use a systematic method to determine the needed improvements, and categorized them in near-term, mid-term, and long-term.
Councilmember Ramswell remarked it was her understanding that required safety improvements and stipulations that are made by State mandates are the responsibility ofFDOT and they will have the burden of paying for it and securing the grant and money. She asked if everything being discussed in the safety assessment report is FDOT's responsibility.
Mr. Perdue noted there are a number of recommendations in the report. Some are considered safety improvement recommendations and other are considered enhancements. He stated there are programs administered by the TPO and prioritized by the TPO to implement enhancement type projects. The FDOT pursues implementing safety recommendations that yield an acceptable benefit costs and have been basically recommended by professional engineers; but within funding limitations. All projects have to be prioritized based on criticality and funding
Page 18 of 20 availability. He added they would want to maintain dialogue with the City, and that any feedback and any support the City could offer during this process would be greatly appreciated.
Councilmember Wood stated he likes the idea of signalized crossings with different color lights because he feels they would work better than the flashing yellow lights. He also likes the median enhancements. He supports the idea of narrowing the lanes; but he also agrees that people drive at the speed with which they are comfortable. He also stated he is not a big proponent of bike lanes on Hwy 98; and that he would rather have wider sidewalks if possible.
The City Manager announced that Canin and Associates will be going back to Council the week of July 20th to discuss the visualization study. He noted that one of the components of the study is transportation and corridor analysis. The firm has been studying the corridor, specifically from Main Street to Marler Bridge, analyzing what to do with the 100 feet; whether to reduce it down to 11 foot travel lane, with wider sidewalk on the south side. He suggests waiting until the firm presents their ideas before Council provides recommendations or ideas to FDOT on what improvements they want to see as part of the resurfacing project. He also asked if FDOT could wait until the end of September to take specific recommendations from the City to incorporate into their scope of services for the resurfacing project.
Mr. Perdue stated they would be willing to wait until the end of September for the recommendations; however, they would like to have an open dialogue with the City soon so they know some of the things the City wants to implement and not wait until the end of September to start that dialogue.
Councilmember Wood moved for approval of US 98 Safety Assessment Report and to direct the City Manager to continue to work with FDOT, its consultants, and the City's planning/transportation/engineering consultants, to better plan for, budget for, and then execute the recommended safety improvements along US 98. Councilmember Ramswell provided a second to the motion. Motion passed 7-0 (Council members Trammell, Wood, Marler, Foreman, Dixon, Ramswell, and Braden voted ''yes").
17. Updated Memorandum of Understanding for Intergovernmental Development Review Coordination
The City Manager explained that a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) addressing intergovernmental development review coordination was developed and adopted by multiple jurisdictions including the City of Destin within Okaloosa County in 1997. This updated MOU has been under development and review by City staff and legal counsel and coordinated with other jurisdiction within Okaloosa County over the last year, and it is being presented to the Council for adoption.
Motion by Councilmember Trammell, seconded by Councilmember Wood, to adopt the Memorandum of Understanding as presented and for the Mayor to sign for execution passed 7-0 (Council members Trammell, Wood, Marler, Foreman, Dixon, Ramswell, and Braden voted ''yes").
Page 19of 20 18. City Manager comments
The City Manager made the following announcements: • Two projects - Clement Taylor Park Renovation & Capt. Royal Melvin Heritage Park Construction - will be presented to the ORAC Committee beginning at noon on Wednesday, June 17th in the Annex Council Chambers • Fireworks display scheduled for Saturday, July 4th, at 9:00PM
Having no further business at this time, the meeting was adjourned at 9:10 PM.
ADOPTED THIS 6™ DAY OF JULY 2015 By:
~elPonder,~ayor
ATTEST:
Rey Bailey, City Clerk
Page20of 20 MINUTES VISIONING SESSION DESTIN CITY COUNCIL MAY 15,2015 8:00AM
The Mayor and Council for the City of Destin met in special session in the Destin Area Chamber of Commerce Conference Room with the following members and staff present:
Destin City Council Mayor Mel Ponder Councilmember Jim Foreman Councilmember Sandy Trammell Councilmember TuftY Dixon Councilmember Jim Wood Councilmember Prebble Ramswell Councilmember Cyron Marler Councilmember Rodney Braden
Destin City Staff City Manager Greg Kisela City Clerk Rey Bailey HR Coordinator Karen Jankowski City Engineer David Campbell Public Information Manager Doug Rainer HR Manager Chuck Garcia Community Dev Director Ken Gallander IT Manager Webb Warren Finance Director Bragg Farmer Parks/Recreation Director Lance Johnson CRA/Development Manager Steve Schmidt Library Director Jurate Burns Grants/Project Manager Lindey Chabot
The City Manager welcomed everyone to the session, discussed the overall objective of the meeting; and then introduced the meeting facilitator Ms. Marilyn Crotty, director of the Florida Institute of Government at the University of Central Florida. Ms. Crotty provided an overview of agenda items and direction for the meeting, and reinforced what needs to be accomplished during this time.
After introductions of all meeting participants, the session began with an environmental scan of external and internal trends and issues that might impact the City of Destin in the next few years.
The Council and staff discussed trends and issues that are currently occurring globally (international, national, and state environment) that may have an impact on the City in the near future. The following external trends and issues were identified as significant for the City of Destin:
);> Long distance work- one does not have to be tied to a geographic location );> Terrorism worst threats now than years ago :;;.. Information immediacy immediate access to information; information not always factual; on-line information; immediate gratification );> Healthcare- access, cost, availability, distribution of knowledge, uncertainty );> Marijuana - legalization :;;.. Digital inclusion- digital divide; access to Wi-Fi, training people on usage > Media slant - media directing viewers however they so choose; i.e., BP oil spill (everything referred to as "Destin beaches") > Centralization of government Federal, State, Municipal (no longer self- contained). > Unfunded mandates - Pushing down responsibility from Federal to State, from State to local government without providing resources. > Failing infrastructure- deterioration, lack of maintenance > Lack of coordination, communication and cooperation among different agencies and governmental entities > Global relationships redefined i.e., complete shift in relationship between US and Cuba; surge of people not pleased with the European Union (calling to rescind the Euro and go back to their old currency). » Federal government financial situation - national debt and spending will have huge impact if not properly addressed and reversed. Problem will trickle down to state and local governments » Accountability- basically none from the Federal government » Judicial system - had given in to influences of political forces and often not make rulings based on constitutional and legal justifications > Military- at the lowest levels since pre-WW II > Political will - no consensus between parties. Critical issues in this country are being decided by one political party » Sense of entitlement - vast majority of people feel they are entitled to do what they want > Growing senior population not being properly addressed; will become problematic > Autonomous and connected vehicles - driverless cars; no human interaction; totally computerized » Underemployment » lllegal Immigration » Selling out of America - about 90% of product not "made in the USA"; USA being indebted to other countries > Change in traditional family - change in family structure; Supreme Court to make a ruling that will have wide-ranging national implication » Social interaction limited by technology » Extreme climate change » Food and health issues -Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs); increased in obesities and cancer » Nomophobia psychological syndrome in which a person is afraid of being out of mobile or cell phone contact
Next, the Council and staff analyzed current internal trends and issues that may have an impact on the City in the near future. The following internal trends and issues were identified as significant for the City of Destin:
Page2of 11 };> Loss of home rule - legislature really been restricting home rule the past few years };> Improved communication through use of technology negative impact: people bombarded with bias media they are not sure who to trust; "double-edged sword" };> Competition with neighboring cities and counties for tourism and businesses - can be positive if there is cooperation to compete with outside area };> Loss of image/brand that is unique - "selling" Destin based on fabricated frenzy as opposed to its true identity };> Need for identity based on own standards- lack of vision or staying with the VISIOn };> Destin originally founded on the fishing industry - changed due to state government fishing regulations (Snappers, Groupers, etc.); tourism has taken over the local economy; lost "small town" feeling; fishing fleet losing to pontoon boat, wave runner rentals };> Changing demographics - no growth on year-round population; influx of people from other states; visitor overcrowding; tourists looking for more eco-tourism };> Development/Redevelopment opportunities some good some bad; some not in line with City's vision; get vision in line with the LDC; consider property right issues };> Economic change due to government influence };> Nimbyism };> Marketplace directing growth sense of entitlement without regard to restrictions };> Trend of attracting foreign tourists they spend more money; area has no natural port of entry; airport authorities coming up with means of facilitating foreign visitors to the area };> Foreign investors can be positive or negative };> Year-round tourism people trying to maximize opportunity within the City; impact on services (City going from 12,000-plus to 60,000-plus residents) };> Pedestrian/bike safety traffic congestion on Hwy 98 };> Multi-model transportation };> Revenue for tourism mitigation currently City gets tourism money from fuel tax and sales tax (based on permanent population of 12,000-plus) };> Alcohol related policy };> Rentals rather than home ownership for many full time residential neighborhoods (short-term and long-term) appearance issues; more crime };> Reduction in workforce- slight increase in employee turnover; job opportunities from other jurisdictions; need to stay competitive to avoid more turnovers };> People having more than one job due to the economy };> Combining services amongst local governments (i.e., libraries, transportations); cost savings };> Increase in petty crime calls for service increase };> Unrealistic expectation of citizens
Page3 of 11 >- Flattening of organization employees at every level wearing many "hats" >- Increased regulations/legal requirements- difficult to keep up
Next, Ms. Crotty discussed S.W.O.T. Analysis with the group and reviewed definitions of the following terms:
STRENGTHS -internal resources or capabilities that help those responsible for carrying out the mandate or mission of the city.
WEAKNESSES - internal deficiencies in resources or capabilities that hinder the ability of those responsible for accomplishing the mandate or mission of the city.
OPPORTUNITIES- external factors or situations that can affect the city in a favorable way.
THREATS - external factors or situations that can affect the city in a negative way.
Ms. Crotty asked the Council and staff to identifY what they perceive as strengths and weaknesses of the City and its government as well as opportunities and threats the City is currently facing. She asked each participant to write down one strength, one weakness, one opportunity and one threat ori separate sheets of paper and then post each sheet on the board under the appropriate category. She then read each of the items by category. The following is a list of posted items:
STRENGTHS:
>- Staff -dedicated; experienced >- Elected officials who care about what and where the City should go >- Natural beauty >- Beaches - beautiful; desirable location >- Institutional knowledge >- Workforce- knowledgeable; experienced >- Teamwork- in organization >- Strong fiscal management by City Council and staff >- Ethicalleadership >- Teamwork >- Manager/Council form of government >- Improved working environment since 2014 >- Tenure of employees -longevity in key positions >- Dedicated staff and Council >- Tradition of great customer service/focused customer service >- Low taxes >- Community closeness/volunteering >- Education in local schools >- Caring/responsible citizens >- Philanthropy >- Affordable programs and services >- Compact geography
Page4of 11 );;. Harbor/Charter Boat Association );;. ~aturalresources );;. East Pass and Destin Harbor );;. Faith based community );;. T earn environment in organization
WEAKNESSES:
);;. Declining infrastructure );;. Aging resources );;. Aging equipment );;. Workforce- lack of training );;. Understanding of comprehensive plan/LDC by elected officials );;. Deferred maintenance due to lack of funding );;. Flat organization - full time employees have been transitioned into areas (part time responsibility) that they were not hired for );;. Weak land use planning and execution; comp plan/LDC unfavorable to redevelopment/development (confusing, contradictions) );;. Limited ability to increase revenue );;. Finances - inadequate revenue to acquire needed resources );;. Declining roads );;. Lack of vision );;. Aging workforce );;. Organizational knowledge- loss of knowledge through attrition/term limits );;. Varied perception of local government (negative) );;. ~o opportunity for advancement );;. Flattening of workforce and compensation );;. Inadequate capital funding );;. Inadequate staff and technology to maintain level of service );;. Mass transit transportation );;. Code enforcement );;. ~o real plan for redevelopment );;. Stormwater );;. Year-round population supporting 5-6 times that population on a year round population based budget ? Staff stretched thin );;. Staying true to decision and not jumping on each/every bandwagon ? Tendency to "kick the can down the road" ? Political will on agendas (inability to make the hard decisions, selfish motivations, etc.) ? Pay compression ? Unknown consequences of federal laws and regulations ? Volunteers on City committees (need more) );;. Too much influence to carry out a vision );;. Diversity of goals within the community -lack of consensus
Page5of 11 J;. OCSO, DFCD and City all fighting funding and budget issues; with City caught in the middle J;. Need to update codes to reflect vision
OPPORTUNITIES:
J;. Public/private partnerships/cost sharing J;. Reestablish brand/identity J;. Synchronization of Pedestrian/bike safety with FDOT J;. Grants - Restore and other grant opportunities; monies are flowing (more available) from sources to assist cities through grants J;. Better marketing of Destin brand J;. Improved technology- improved opportunities/communication J;. Visioning/visualization; Canin and Associates J;. Projects (transportation) - Beach to Benning; Linear Park - Gulf Power Easement J;. Evaluate and refocus J;. Maximizing natural resources for tourism J;. Better recruitment of qualified J;. Name recognition (Destin) J;. Interlocal/working with TDC; stronger relationship with TDC; better cooperation J;. Region to attract large sports tourism events as new facilities come on-line J;. Popular destination J;. To steer City in a positive direction before too late J;. Increased tourism helps businesses prosper J;. Technology -equipment upgrades J;. Tracking performance measures J;. Enhanced communication through many channels- mostly free to the public J;. Citizenserve software J;. Recreation/tournaments J;. Streamline government J;. Clear plan for future development
THREATS:
J;. Unfunded mandates J;. Negative media attention J;. Development not compatible by City J;. College Spring Break/Alcohol J;. Demand vs. Revenue J;. Low ad-valorem revenues J;. Length of time to work/solve the traffic/transportation issues J;. Political rhetoric versus actual laws/codes reality J;. Attracting undesirable elements to Destin J;. Hurricanes -increase in lower income housing
Page6of 11 ? Increased traffic congestion, density ? Bad information, rumors ? Personal agendas- "my way rules don't apply to me" ? Confusing growing regulatory environment ? Loss of home rule (local discretion) ? Too much outside influence of people telling the City what to do ? Maintaining brand status - world class/desirable destination ? Aging infrastructure ? Allowing certain groups to influence City ? Overcrowding ? Brain drain as retirees leave workforce ? Increased demand/expectations for service ? Increasing maintenance ? Vacant, abandoned buildings ? Lowering of standards, expectations attracting lower socio-economic clientele, hurting business ? Fishing regulations ? Increased Nimbyism ? Public speaking by council members that does not reflect Council stance (non- professional language) ? Increasing litigation » Neighbors to the East and West ? Segment of population unwilling to move forward and/or accept necessary change
Next, Ms. Crotty reviewed the five goals in the existing strategic plan with the Council and staff. She remarked Council should decide whether these are the right goals; or if they need to be amended or more goals added.
The Council agreed existing goals were appropriate to continue for the next fiscal year, and included the following suggestions:
1. Financially Sound City Providing Service Excellence 2. World Class Beach, Fishing and Harbor
Councilmember Trammell suggests incorporating economic development into this goal, or adding an economic development goal, as Council previously discussed looking at alternatives other than beaches, fishing, and the harbor to sustain their year-round population.
Councilmember Foreman recommends refining the fifth goal, ''Quality Development and Revitalization" to include economic development.
The Grant/Program Manager noted that "developing and implementing the City's Economic Development Plan" is already included in goal #5.
Page 7 of 11 Councilmember Trammell suggests "Family Friendly" be added to goal #2; stating that what the developers consider a world class harbor is not what they can necessarily assume as a family friendly harbor.
Councilmember Foreman suggests renaming this goal to read, "Destin is a Family Friendly, World Class Beach and Fishing City."
3. Improved Mobility and Connectivity
Councilmember Wood suggests renaming this goal to read, "Safe and Efficient Multi-Modal Connectivity. "
4. Expanded Community Amenities (Or Residents and Guests
Councilmember Trammell recommends incorporating "Improved Quality of Life" and the word "Environment" into this goal.
According to Mayor Ponder, what is missing from these goals is an assurance for a high level of safety and security for residents, businesses and visitors. He continued in light of the unrest around this community and from the international terrorist type activities, the citizens of a small community like Destin that does not have all the amenities as do other larger cities need to feel their health, safety and welfare are a priority. He added they may need to have a standalone goal of maintaining a safe and secure environment for residents, businesses and guests.
The Grants/Program Manager noted that staff's primary mission, and which is also the City's core value, is the public health, safety and welfare of citizens. She continued this is their primary consideration in everything they do regardless which strategic goal or objective it falls under.
Councilmember Dixon stated when they discuss safety for this community their primary concerns should be if their Emergency Management System (EMS) is operating properly, rapid response times from their fire department, and receiving a high level of service from the sheriffs department.
Councilmember Marler remarked citizens also need to understand that maintaining a high level of service from the sheriff's department, fire department and EMS costs a lot of money.
Ms. Crotty suggests rewording this goal and removing the words "Expanded" and "Amenities" and inserting "Safety" and "High Quality of Life" and making sure they provide a safe and secure quality of life for their residents and visitors; adding they should make this goal as broad as possible.
Page8of 11 5. Quality Development and Revitalization
Ms. Crotty acknowledged that this goal includes some economic development based on its current objectives: • More diverse local economy • Extend the boardwalk (east and west) • Increased opportunities to work and live in Destin • New developments consistent with Destin character and standards
Mayor Ponder suggests adding "Family Friendly'' atmosphere into this goal; adding they should have family in mind as they develop; and not just to develop for the sake of development.
The City Manager noted the term "Family Friendly" may have different meaning to different people; adding they would need a clear definition of"Family Friendly."
Ms. Crotty stated it could be that they are hopeful this community embraces the idea of families as important, and they want to have activities, places and resources that support and promote wide range of attractions for families.
The Community Development Director noted that family friendly development will be further defined through the visualization process with Canin & Associates.
Councilmember Trammell remarked based on her discussions with various people, they want more of a traditional family values type community; adding as an example, instead of "Wonderworks", they would have nature trail.
Ms. Crotty suggested, and Council agreed, to encapsulate each of these goals into a sentence instead of a phrase; and to use action words such as "to develop", "'to determine", "to promote", or '"to create" for statements to be more action oriented and to clearly indicate the intent of the goal.
Staff will develop goal statements and bring them back to Council for approval.
At this time, Ms. Crotty asked the Council to identify new objectives for each goal; and then select their priority objectives for implementation. She also noted that objectives receiving support from four or more elected officials will be identified as "Priority Objectives"; and the rest will be designated as "Other Objectives."
The results are as follows (Note: The number of votes is identified in parentheses following each objective that received votes from Council).
);.> Financially Sound City Providing Service Excellence
•!• Identify and seek alternative revenue sources •!• Review investment policy looking for the best return •!• Update the Stormwater Master Plan (.2 votes)
Page9of 11 •!• Provide more public education relating to City's budget, revenues and expenses ( 1 vote) •!• Restore Act Plan -Identify and design projects (4 votes) •!• Explore alternatives to collection of garbage fees
);> World Class Beach, Fishing, and Harbor
•!• Explore potential for development of a City marina (2 votes) •!• Expansion of Joe's Bayou City boat launch site (4 votes) •!• Continue restoration ofNorriego Point ( 3 votes) •!• Continue harbor boardwalk to east and west and promote fishing industry (2 votes) •!• Continued enforcement ofboardwalk regulations •!• Explore opportunities to provide additional beach for the public (4 votes) •!• Continue partnership with Henderson Beach State Park •!• Expansion ofharbor parking (3 votes)
);> Improved Mobility and Connectivity
•!• Provide safe pedestrian crossings on Hwy 98 and throughout the City (includes non-crossing areas designated) (5 votes) •!• Extend boardwalk under the bridge (3 votes) •!• Review speed limits throughout the City and make recommendations as needed (2 votes) •!• Further implementation of Master Pathways Plan (3 votes) •!• Build pedestrian trall along Gulf Power Easement (5 votes) •!• Complete Beach to Benning connector (3 votes) •!• Continue implementation of multi-modal plan (includes wayfinding) •!• Explore metered parking (pay to park) in appropriate areas of the City (4 votes) •!• Complete sidewalks on Commons Drive (1 vote)
);> High Quality of Life and Safety for Residents and Guests
•!• Provide additional parking at the elementary school (partnership with school district) •!• Advocate for creation of a high school in the City (possibly charter school) (2 votes) •!• Develop Parks and Recreation Master Plan (4 votes) •!• Maintain a high level of safety and security for residents, businesses, and visitors (6 votes) •!• Provide optimal operation ofharbor flushing system (1 vote} •!• Implementation of Code Enforcement Compliance Action Plan (4 votes) •!• Revision of alcohol regulations (3 votes)
PagelOof 11 );> Quality Development and Revitalization
•!• Pursue appropriate annexations (1 vote) •!• Complete visualization process, update the comprehensive plan and LDC (6 votes) •!• Develop Economic Development Plan (1 vote) •!• Landscape improvements for the Town Center CRA (5 votes)
Having no further business at this time, the session was adjourned at 4:00 PM.
ADOPTED THIS 6TH DAY OF JULY 2015 By:
Mel Ponder, Mayor ATTEST:
Rey Bailey, City Clerk
Page 11 of 11 CITY OF DESTIN AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 6, 2015 TYPE OF AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing-1st Reading
TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: City Manager, Greg Kisela ~ w-- ~ Community Development Director, Ken Gallander, AICP T Finance Director, Bragg Farmer City Land Use Attorney, Scott Shirlef?viYp.-~ Planning Manager, R. Ashley Grana~ FROM: Planner, Hank Woollard, AIC~J DATE: June 8, 2015
SUBJECT: Review and recommendation of proposed Ordinance No. 14-06-LC, which is an ordinance that would amend Article 19 of the Land Development Code (LDC) by creating Section 19.05.00. Multimodal mitigation fee, which are fees used to construct off-site multimodal transportation improvements.
I. BACKGROUND: Concurrency is the concept by which adequate public facilities must be in place to accommodate new development. Under conventional transportation concurrency, that means having adequate roadway capacity to handle the traffic impacts of new development. Seveml years ago the State of Florida recognized the increasing difficulty and expense of meeting transportation concurrency by constructing new roadway facilities in rapidly developing urbanized areas. So, the State Legislature created the opportunity for local governments to meet concurrency through the development of transportation alternatives within multimodal transportation districts.
Because Destin was facing roadway capacity failures on some sections of U.S. Highway 98, the City pursued the option of a multimodal transportation district and became the first city in the State of Florida to achieve the multimodal transportation district (MMTD) designation. This meant that the City of Destin could avoid potential development moratoriums by giving equal emphasis to all modes of transportation in its Capital Improvements Program. It also meant the City would require new development to incorpomte road network, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit friendly design features.
As a means of identifYing and quantifying the value of meeting the various multimodal design regulations in Article 8 -Transportation, Section 6.05.05. Multimodal Transportation Concurrency was adopted into Article 6, Concurrency Management of the Land Development Code. A series of points based Concurrency Evaluation Certificates (CECs) were created to be used with different types of development in the Old Destin and in the Crystal Beach sub areas of the MMTD. The points based system is more fully described in Section 6.05.05 (refer to Exhibit A for one example that would be used on a Tier 1 project in the Old Destin sub area). A development earns points by incorporating various features which would reduce the calculated vehicular trip generation. These features include pedestrian oriented building design, diverse and complimentary uses, vehicular network improvements, on-site parking features; as well as pedestrian, cycling, and transit network
Pagel of3 improvements. This system is designed to have some flexibility for those situations where certain regulations cannot be met or an applicant has a valid reason for not being able to meet the regulation. A development that cannot achieve the required number of points for concurrency can pay a fee for mitigation points to make up the difference. Fees paid to the City for mitigation points are to be used for off-site multimodal improvements. A fee amount of one thousand dollars ($1,000) per mitigation point was recommended and this fee amount was subsequently vetted through a total of four public hearings (2 LPA & 2 City Council) during the adoption process for Ordinance 08-14-LC. Staff proposes via Ordinance 14-06-LC that the fee amount be adjusted for inflation as needed through the annual fee resolution.
II. DISCUSSION: The City of Destin Finance Director spoke to the City's audit firm and both agreed that the City should adopt a change to the MMTD requirements that creates a specific fund for the MMTD mitigation fees and identifies the specific uses of those funds. This will be similar to the structure currently in place for Road, Library, Parks, and Police Impact fees. Proposed Ordinance 14-06-LC is designed to achieve those goals.
Any person who applies for a Certificate of Occupancy for a project required to meet multimodal transportation concurrency, but that does not achieve the minimum points requirement will be required to pay a fee. The Certificate of Occupancy may not be issued until the fee is paid. A multimodal transportation mitigation fee trust fund will be established. Fees collected must be deposited into the trust fund. The funds may only be used for multimodal transportation improvements.
III. ORGANIZATIONAL IMPACTS:
A. Link to Strategic Goals /Objectives: Organizational Excellence through continuous improvement ofthe codes and ordinances of the City of Destin.
B. Effect on Budget (EOB): Unquantifiable, however the multimodal mitigation fees will result in more funds available for multimodal transportation improvements as outlined within the City's Capital Improvements Program.
C. Level of Service (LOS): Unquantifiable at present, but the net effect of collecting the multimodal mitigation fees and earmarking them for multimodal transportation improvements will increase multimodal transportation levels of service for the City.
Note: Proposed Ordinance 14-06-LC also corrects the legend on Map 8-4 Multimodal Transportation District Map of the Land Development Code. The legend currently identifies the "Old Destin MMTD" and "Crystal Beach MMTD" (refer to Exhibit C). The legend is corrected to read "Old Destin MMTD sub area" and "Crystal Beach MMTD sub area" (refer to Exhibit D).
IV. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY: The modifications to the Land Development Code that are proposed in Ordinance No. 14-06-LC are consistent with the following Policies (refer to Exhibit "E").
Policy 2-1.3.5: Design Development to be Supportive of Multimodal Transportation and Reductions in Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). Policy 2-1.3.6: Crystal Beach Transition Area.
Page 2 of3 Policy 2-1.3.7: Increase Connectivity in the Crystal Beach Area. Policy 2-1.3.8: Review LDC's Multimodal Design Standards. Policy 2-1.3.9: Complete Existing Pedestrian and Cycling Infrastructure. Policy 2-1.3.10: Include Pedestrian and Cycling Facilities with Road Projects. Policy 2-1.3.11: Create Safe Pedestrian and Cycling Roadway Crossings. Policy 2-1.3.12: Expand and Enhance Transit Coverage and Service. Policy 2-1.3.13: Coordinate with Okaloosa County. Policy 2-1.3.14: Promote Water Taxi/Shuttle Service. Policy 2-1.3.15: Encourage and Facilitate Expanded Water Taxi/Shuttle Operations. Policy 2-1.3.16: Develop Interconnected Street Network. Policy 2-1.3.17: Prioritize Community Parking over On-site Parking. Policy 2-1.3.18: Continue to Evaluate the Need and Implement Additional Parking Districts as Conditions Merit. Policy 2-1.3.19: Dedicate Funding to Multimodal Transportation Improvements.
V. LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY (LPA) DISCUSSION: The Planning Manager read the ordinance title into the record. Staff explained the purpose of why proposed Ordinance No. 14-06- LC had to come back to the LPA for review. The Chairman opened the Public Hearing. There was no one from the public present to speak on the matter. Staff explained that they discovered, the day after the last LPA meeting, that the title of the ordinance needed to be amended to include a provision for updating Map 8-4. So staff re-advertised the ordinance for the May LPA meeting so the correction could be made prior to the ordinance being heard by City Council. Staff then proceeded to inform the Agency members of the changes to the ordinance and the map. Mr. Link made the recommended motion to find proposed Ordinance 14-06-LC consistent with Comprehensive Plan: 2020 and recommend its adoption by the City Council on first reading. The motion was seconded by Mr. Blackwood. The vote passed by a vote of 6-0.
VI. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Proposed Ordinance 14-06-LC provides a clear structure and process for the collection accountability and use of multimodal mitigation fees. Staff recommends that the Local Planning Agency find proposed Ordinance 14-06-LC consistent with Comprehensive Plan: 2020 and recommend its adoption by the City Council.
VII. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move that the Destin City Council approve proposed Ordinance 14-06-LC on 1st Reading and direct staff to schedule a public hearing for final adoption on 2"d reading."
Exhibits: A. MMTD CEC - Tier 1 Old Destin B. Proposed Ordinance 14-06-LC C. Map 8-4 Multimodal Transportation District D. Map 8-4 Multimodal Transportation District- Updated E. Comprehensive Plan: 2020 Related Policies
Page3of3 Multi-~odal T1·smsportation Distlid Impact Analvsis R~po1·tina Form - Old D~stin Sub-ar~a (Ti~rl) Net PM~ bour trips (excluding cm:tits for existing trips): Points~ i)e!YesorNI'A - - :c'1.1 Sttndard "01 fi-o ·~ .~ i ., ·-o·§ -11 met? Yes, Point value -~I ~. Cl.~ ·- ., c:o ·:; ~~ ~j ~., No. or per r ~l c: a:i! ~t ~ !A standard ~~ <&. <.s'&. Pt'dMtrian-OJientt'd buDding dMign I. Buildings directly adjacent to si~ - > 7~ ofhata!e alca!public ROW 20 f SO%- 1S%of~ aqpuhtic ROW - 13 .. o 25%- SO% of'~ aqpabtic ROW 7 Ju < !5° o offronta~~ along public ROW 0 x2- 2. Buildings ctiRctly adjaceut to Halbor Boardwalk 111 > 15% of~ aJoag Harbor .Boantwa1k 15 f SO%- 75%of'~ 0., Harbor BocdwaDc - 10 20 25%- SO% of'~ Uq Harbor BocdwaDc s < 2.5% of~ along Harl>or Boardv.'llll: J 0 x2- 3. Building entrances oriented to public ROW IS x2- 30 4. Fa~ design L Less thaD 100 fed ofuaimat'4'telt ~ s x2- 26 b. T~. primary ROW s x2• c:. Transparency. secondary ROW (comer lot only) 3 x2- D trer4it and complementan· land U4it>4i S. TRIISit-5Upp011ive deusityflll1eDsity > l.S FAR or > 40 DU/~ 20 1.0-l.S FAR or 2S - 40 DU/aae f- lS O.S-I.OFARor IS-25 DU/acre j 10 <0.50 FAR or< IS DU/aae u 0 xl- 10 6. Mixeduse a. On-site .. or more uses ,.. 20 3 uses 1 lS 2uses 10 1 use J 0 x2• b. ComplementarY to adjacent ~s 10 xl• 30 EXHIBIT A 7. Street-level ~~strian-on~ted use 10 x2- 20 8. No drive-through bcilities 10 x1- 10 Vehicula1· network 9. Meets maximum blodc l~gth standards 10 xl - 10 10. Dedication of roadway cotridor 10 x2- 20 11. Meds maximum turning radii stancbrds s x2 - 10
12. Access management - a. Meets minimum ac:cessw3Y spaciDg standards 5 xl- IS b. Provide> cross aod/or sbafed access s xi - c. Prohibits direct US HighwaY 98 access s xl - On-site parkio2 13. Parting location Structured aod/or bebind buildings 20 - 20 Along public ROW. oext to buildings 10 Between buildings and public ROW J 0 x1- 14. Parking maximum
20%- 30% below ~ ..,....jnmm 20
1~- 20% below the maximum 15 f 20 0%- 10% below the mnimnm - 10 0%- 15% above the maximum J s > 15% above tbe maximum 0 x2- IS. On-site. shared parking Rduction for mixed use 5 x1- s 16. Off-site. shared parking agrffill~t 2 17. Off-site, on-strm parking 2 18. Parting fee paid in lieu of on-site palking > 75% ofpilltiag paid by h t 10 SO%- 75% ofpba.g pUd by fee - 7 2S%- 50% ofpd:iag paid by fee 3 < 25% of pad.ing paid by fee J 0 Pedestrian network 19. S~ aloag public ROW 1- > 12' sidewalk 30 f 11' - 12• sidewalk - 20 40 9' - 10' sidewalk J 10 < 8' sidewalk .. 0 x2- 20. Sidewalk buffer 4 x2- 8 21. S1RetScapillg 7 a. Sidewalk furmture 2 xl - b. Street trees in sidewalk bu&r or on street edge of sidewaDc 3 xl- c. Pedestrian-oriented hghtmg: 2 xl- 22. lntcmal sidewalks a. s• sidewalks connect all on-site uses 5 x2- 20 b. S' sidewalks cotJDect to adJac~t parcels 5 x2- 23. Crosswalks across an intema1 streets 6 x2• 12 24. Hamor Access a. Dedication ofeasement for transit stop or bus bay 10 x2- 20 b. Construct Harbor boardwalk along Harbor frontage 20 CnUnsr: network 25. Bicycle padciDg Outdoor, UDCOWRd 10 x2- - 20 Outdoor, covaed J IS x2- IDdoor or bicycle lockers 20 x2- 26. Dedicanon ofmininwm 10' \\idth bikeway easem~t 10 x~- 20 Transit network 27. Transit stop a. Dedication ofeasement for transit stop or bus bay 20 b. Amenities (shelter. bench, bike pasting. trash can. b:ansit info board) 20
28. Direct sidewalk connection to transit stop 10 x"•~ 20 Additional miti2ation 29. Off-site multimodal mitigation a. CODStruct off-site sidewalk. per 20 feet 1 Feet: b. Contribute towards transit operations, per $1.000 1 $: c. Provide fuoding for transit amenities (see 26b) off-site 10 d. Otbcr staff-approved mitigation. per $1.000 1 $: 30. Travel demand management pro~am uP to 10 Points: 31. Functional on-site o~ space up to 10 Points: 32. Attainable Wotkforce housing up to 20 Points: A B c Total points 453 Traffic impact adjustment (based on trip generation rate) "B" Multiolier- AdiustedB• Additional mitigation requited (Adjusted B -A-C)- IDcadive points emled (.A ...... B X 1.1 -A - C) - 0 (1) The MMTD total point requirement Is reduced by 20 points for properties that do not contain the Harbor Boardwalk.
EXHIBIT A EXHIBITB
ORDINANCE 14-06-LC
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DESTIN, FLORIDA RELATING TO MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION MITIGATION FEES; PROVIDING FOR AUTHORITY; PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS OF FACT; PROVIDING FOR THE AMENDMENT OF MAP 8-4 MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT MAP; PROVIDING FOR THE CREATION OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 18.05.00 MULTIMODAL MITIGATION FEE; PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION INTO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DESTIN, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1: AUTHORITY. The authority for the enactment of this Ordinance is Section 1.01 of the City Charter; Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes; Sections 166.021 and 166.041, Florida Statutes; and the City's Comprehensive Plan.
SECTION 2: FINDINGS OFFACTS.
WHEREAS, the adopted Multimodal Transportation District provides the City of Destin with alternatives to meeting conventional transportation concurrency, and
WHEREAS, Article 8 Transportation of the Land Development Code provides site development standards in support of the adopted Multimodal Transportation District, and
WHEREAS, Article 6 - Concurrency Management System of the Land Development Code provides for a points scoring method of achieving multimodal concurrency by assigning points to a variety of site development options, and
WHEREAS, a development may achieve multimodal concurrency by scoring the required total number of points through the implementation of such site development options, and
WHEREAS, Article 6 - Concurrency Management System of the Land Development Code provides for mitigation points which a developer may earn for a development that has not scored sufficient points to achieve multimodal concurrency, and
WHEREAS, mitigation points may be earned through contributions toward off-site multimodal transportation improvements, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this Ordinance is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan and is in the best interests of the City and its citizens; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is advisable to create a new Section in the Land Development Code that specifies how Multimodal Mitigation Fees are collected, managed, and expended; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing has been conducted after "due public notice" by the Destin the
Page 1 of3 EXHIBITB
Local Planning Agency with its recommendations reported to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing has been conducted by the City Council after "due public notice".
NOTE: Language in section 3 ofthis ordinance that is strttek threugh is language proposed to be deleted, underlined language is language proposed to be added, language that is not strttek thrt~l:lgh or underlined is not to be changed, and * * * represents sections of the Land Development Code that have been skipped and remain unchanged.
SECTION 3. AMDNEDMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 8.09.02. APPLICABILITY.MAP 8-4 MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT MAP. Section 8.09.02.Applicability. Map 8-4 Multimodal Transportation District is hereby amended as follows:
Map 8-4 (Exhibit 1)
SECTION 5. CREATION OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 18.05.00. MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION MITIGATION FEE. Section 18.05.00. Multimodal mitigation fee of the Land Development Code is hereby created as follows:
Section 18.05.00. Multimodal mitigation fee. Multimodal mitigation fees are provided as a means of allowing a development to achieve the required number of points on a multimodal transportation district concurrency evaluation form as found at the end of Article 6 - Concurrency Management System. Mitigation points may be earned through contributions towards off-site multimodal improvements.
18.05.01. Computation o(the multimodal mitigation fee. Multimodal mitigation fees are calculated based on the applicants submission of a Multimodal Transportation Concurrency Evaluation Certificate prepared in accordance with the requirements of LDC Section 6.05.05. Multimodal Transportation Concurrency. A per point fee contribution is collected at a rate of $1000.00 per point or at the prevailing cost to construct on-site multimodal improvements that the developer wishes to mitigate. If the developer chooses to use the prevailing cost, it shall be the responsibility of the developer to demonstrate that the identified prevailing costs are current and accurate.
18.05.02. Fees collected to be earmarked (or off-site multimodal improvements. Funds collected via the multimodal mitigation fee shall be used solely for the purpose of constructing multimodal transportation facilities identified in the City's 5 year Capital Improvements Program and shall be deposited in an account specifically earmarked for multimodal improvements.
18.05.03. Expenditure o(multimodal mitigation fees. Such funds shall be expended in the order in which they are collected.
*** SECTION 4. INCORPORATION INTO LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. This ordinance shall be incorporated into the City of Destin's Land Development Code and any section or paragraph number or letter and any heading may be changed or modified as necessary to effectuate the foregoing.
SECTION 5. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special Acts of the Florida Legislature applicable to the incorporated area of the City of Destin, City Ordinances and City Resolutions, or parts, thereof, in
Page 2 of3 EXHIBITB conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict.
SECTION 6. SEVERABILITY. Each separate provision of this ordinance is deemed independent of all other provisions herein so that if any portion or provision of this ordinance is declared invalid, all other provisions thereof shall remain valid and enforceable.
SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective upon its adoption by the City Council and signature by the Mayor.
ADOPTED THIS DAY OF ______
By: ------Mel Ponder, Mayor
ATTEST: The form and legal sufficiency of the foregoing has been reviewed and approved by the City Land Use Attorney.
Rey Bailey, City Clerk Scott Shirley, City Land Use Attorney
First Reading: ______Second Reading: _____
Page 3 of3 Choctawhatchee Bay
Map 8-4
Multimodal Transportation District Map t North Scale 1" = 3000'
, '',. City Limits /:;;,.A Potential Future Gulf of Mexico V~ Transportation Corridor r--1 Old Destin MMTD .A West Dest1n 1.-.1 sub area T East Dest1n Crystal Beach MMTD Cl~ubarea Unincorporated
0
Gulf of Mexico TheCrty llw'"' Map 8-4
Multimodal Transportation District Map t North Sc:ale 1" • lJOJ'
~ • v · Clly~lmllli • ., Palefllra' fi.F.Ui'e ,.. Ttoln&pclr'.3 11'on Coi111CIOr .::::::::::1 Cfd OeliUr tl tiTD I::] C~~~ h.)C~ tiMTD ur ,eorpor~ltt.l Choctawhatchee \ \ Bay I
Map 8-4
Multimodal Transportation District Map t North Scale 1" =3000'
, , ',. City Limits ~A Potential Future v~· Transportation Corridor ,....., Old Destin MMTD .. West Destin ...... , subarea T East Destin Crystal Beach MMTD CJ sub area .. Unincorporated
Gulf of Mexico The City -the onl EXHffiiTE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES IN SUPPORT OF ORDINANCE 14-06-LC
Policy 2-1.3.5: Design Development to be Supportive of Multimodal Transportation and Reductions in Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). Development within the Bay Resort Mixed Use, Calhoun Mixed Use, Crystal Beach Neighborhood, Crystal Beach Resort, Gulf Resort Mixed Use, High Density Residential, Holiday Isle Mixed Use, North Harbor Mixed Use, South Harbor Mixed Use, and Town Center Mixed Use land use classifications, as designated in Chapter 1, Future Land Use Element, shall meet standards of intensity, diversity, design, and connectivity of land uses as defined in the Land Development Code (LDC) to establish a high concentration and variety of destinations that can be easily accessed by a variety of transportation modes. These standards shall address the following:
A. The intensity and density of development. The standards shall establish a high concentration of activities and destinations. Residential density up to 40 dwelling units per acre and non residential intensity up to a 2.50 floor area ratio shall be allowed. B. A diversity in land uses to serve multiple functions within a concentrated area. A minimum of two land uses shall be required in mixed-use zoning districts with additional uses encouraged through impact fee credits. C. Complementary land uses to increase transportation efficiency. D. Maximum front setbacks to improve access between buildings and the multimodal transportation network. Setback requirements shall range from zero to 35 feet depending on the height of the building. E. Site design characteristics shall be considered such as building location, parking location, and landscaping to maximize access to the multimodal transportation network. F. Building orientation shall be considered to increase accessibility to the public street with a secondary emphasis towards on-site parking. G. Facade lines with consideration of significant ground floor transparency to provide a continuous and attractive streetscape. H. On-site multimodal transportation infrastructure for the provision of pedestrian and bicycle connections to public sidewalks, cycling facilities, transit stops, buildings, parking, adjacent land uses, and within the development. I. Shade trees, lighting, street furniture, and other amenities along sidewalks and at transit stops to improve the design and accessibility of the on-site multimodal transportation infrastructure. J. On-site connections within and surrounding the North and South Harbor Areas to facilitate access to and within the North and South Harbor Areas.
Policy 2-1.3.6: Crystal Beach Transition Area. Development within the Crystal Beach sub-area overlay, as designated in Chapter 1, Future Land Use Element, shall serve as a transition area between the MMTD and areas outside of the MMTD.
Policy 2-1.3.7: Increase Connectivity in the Crystal Beach Area. The City shall focus its efforts in the Crystal Beach sub-area on increasing connectivity and constructing multimodal infrastructure to improve linkages within the sub-area and to surrounding areas of the City and adjacent Counties. These standards shall address, at a minimum, the following:
A. On-site multimodal transportation infrastructure to provide connections to public sidewalks, cycling facilities, transit stops, buildings, parking, and adjacent land uses. EXHffiiTE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES IN SUPPORT OF ORDINANCE 14-06-LC
B. Shade trees, lighting, street furniture, and other amenities along sidewalks and at transit stops to improve the design and accessibility of the on-site multimodal transportation infrastructure.
Policy 2-1.3.8: Review LDC's Multimodal Design Standards. The City shall continue to review, and revise as necessary the LDC's multimodal design standards including requirements and acceptable ranges for each urban design element and incentive programs for enhanced design. These standards shall be distributed as a component of the development review process.
Policy 2-1.3.9: Complete Existing Pedestrian and Cycling Infrastructure. The City shall enhance the existing pedestrian and cycling systems by filling gaps in the network and providing new pedestrian and cycling facilities throughout the city. These facilities shall provide a safe and continuous pedestrian and cycling network between residential areas, the Community Redevelopment Areas (CRAs), the major activity zones, and transit connections, particularly within the MMTD. Facilities that have been programmed into the City's Capital Improvements Program are displayed in Table 2-3 and on Map 2-2.
Policy 2-1.3.10: Include Pedestrian and Cycling Facilities with Road Projects. The City shall construct pedestrian and cycling facilities as a component of any publicly-funded road construction or reconstruction project, and developers shall construct pedestrian and cycling facilities as a component of any privately-funded road construction or reconstruction projects that will be dedicated to the City in accordance with the Land Development Code.
Policy 2-1.3.11: Create Safe Pedestrian and Cycling Roadway Crossings. The City shall create safe crossings on Harbor Boulevard/Emerald Coast Parkway between the Marler Bridge and the eastern edge of the Town Center CRA, with particular emphasis on strengthening the connection between the Town Center and the Harbor. Crossings shall be evaluated and designed to provide maximum pedestrian visibility, safety, and convenience, consistent with all applicable standards guidelines and best current practices. The City shall coordinate with FDOT to ensure adequate crossings are planned and constructed along Harbor Boulevard/Emerald Coast Parkway for safe crossing of that facility.
Policy 2-1.3.12: Expand and Enhance Transit Coverage and Service. The City shall continue to coordinate with Okaloosa County and seek to identify additional financial support for Okaloosa County Transit to maintain and enhance service, and to meet adopted transit level of service standards. Map 2-10 of the Data, Inventory, and Analysis shows transit routes and stops currently serving Destin.
Policy 2-1.3.13: Coordinate with Okaloosa County. The City shall coordinate with Okaloosa County on future updates of the Transit Development Plan to ensure continued enhancement of transit service and facilities within the City, particularly the Multimodal Transportation District, and transit trip generators and attractors. The City shall continue to dedicate or provide right-of-way for the provision of access to transit facilities. Alternatively, the City may provide financial contributions towards the costs of expanding transit service coverage. The City shall also encourage the implementation of private shuttle services as a component of planned development.
Policy 2-1.3.14: Promote Water Taxi/Shuttle Service. Prior to the next EAR, the City of Destin shall adopt a process to accept private and public contributions toward the provision of space for water taxi EXHffiiTE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES IN SUPPORT OF ORDINANCE 14-06-LC docking facilities and multimodal connections to water taxi/shuttle locations in order to promote water taxi/shuttle service in the City.
Policy 2-1.3.15: Encourage and Facilitate Expanded Water Taxi/Shuttle Operations. The City shall encourage expanded water taxi/shuttle operations that serve potential patrons along Choctawhatchee Bay, Joe's Bayou, Indian Bayou, and other strategic shoreline access points.
Policy 2-1.3.16: Develop Interconnected Street Network. The City shall continue to develop an interconnected road network providing an alternative to Harbor Boulevard/Emerald Coast Parkway for local traffic. The alternative corridor shall provide a continuous connection from Danny Wuerffel Way in Okaloosa County along Commons Boulevard and through the city to Stahlman Avenue. Additional north south alternatives east of Main Street shall also be considered to further the creation of a grid network. The recommended network is shown in Map 2-1.
Policy 2-1.3.17: Prioritize Community Parking over On-site Parking. The City shall continue to prioritize community parking over on-site parking through the City's parking regulations contained within the Land Development Code.
Policy 2-1.3.18: Continue to Evaluate the Need and Implement Additional Parking Districts as Conditions Merit. The City may establish parking districts where on-site parking shall be discouraged and the construction and use of off-site community parking structures shall be encouraged as provided in the LDC.
Policy 2-1.3.19: Dedicate Funding to Multimodal Transportation Improvements. The City shall continue the transportation impact fee and the fee in lieu of multimodal design/development features to enable the funding of multi modal transportation facilities and to support multimodal design standards. ITEM# .s- CITY OF DESTIN AGENDA ITEM
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 6, 2015 TYPE OF AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing- 1st Reading
TO: Mayor and City Council THROUGH: City Manager, Greg Kisela ~ /b Community Development Director, Ken Gallander, AICP r City Land Use Attorney, Scott ShirleyftU~, SJ FROM: Planning Manager, Ashley Grana11'6-
DATE: June 1, 2015
SUBJECT: Review and recommendation of Ordinance No. 15-03-LC, which is an ordinance that would amend the Land Development Code (LDC) by amending Section 7.15.08. Noise zones established, to include the 2013 Official Noise Exposure Map from the Destin-Ft. Walton Beach Airport Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study. The ordinance also changes the name of the airport from Destin-Fort Walton Beach Airport to the Destin Executive Airport in the LDC.
I. BACKGROUND: The Okaloosa County Airports System initiated the 2013 FAR Part 150 Study in order to define aircraft noise exposure within the community and to develop a noise compatibility program in cooperation with all stakeholders (community residents, airport users, aircraft manufacturers, airport proprietors, and federal, state, and local governments) to minimize noise incompatibilities. Approval of the noise compatibility program by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) allows the County to be eligible for noise mitigation funding.
In essence, FAR Part 150 prescribes standards and systems for the following: • Measuring airport noise; • Estimating cumulative noise exposure using computer models; • Describing noise exposure; • Identifying land uses that are generally compatible with various levels of exposure to aircraft generated noise; • Coordinating noise compatibility program development with local land use planning officials and other interested parties; • Documenting the analytical process and results, and the development of the noise compatibility program; • Submitting the necessary documentation to the FAA; • Conducting FAA and public review processes; and • FAA compliance determination using FAR Part 150 requirements.
The noise measurement standard of the Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study is called a "Day-Night Average Sound Level," expressed as DNL or LDN. It is used to describe the cumulative noise exposure during an average annual day. LDN does not represent the sound level heard at any particular time, but rather represents the total sound exposure. The Land Development Code (LDC)
Page I of3 Airport Zoning Regulations establish three land use noise zones: zone A, zone B, and zone C. Zone A (75 LDN and above) experiences the loudest aircraft noise and zone C (65 LDN to 70 LDN) experiences the least aircraft noise of the three zones. Land uses with noise impacts less than 65 DNL are considered by FAA guidelines to be compatible with airport noise.
The LDC provides standards for noise mitigation when development occurs within these noise zones. The areas outside of the three noise zones are not considered to experience aircraft noise requiring sound mitigation. Up until now, the LDC has simply referenced the Okaloosa County airport maps for visual depictions of the boundaries of the noise zones. These maps were created to be valid through the year 2000 and are now long overdue for an update. As a result of the recommendations of the Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study, the City is adopting an Official Noise Exposure Map that resulted from the 2013 update of the Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study (refer to exhibit "A.1 ").
The 2013 Official Noise Exposure Map graphically depicts the noise contours and the location of parcels within the noise contours as follows:
• The 75 DNL or greater noise contour (aka: Zone A) • The 70 to 75 DNL noise contour (aka: Zone B), and • The 65 to 70 DNL noise contour (aka: Zone C)
II. DISCUSSION: This report and ordinance went before the Destin Airport Compatibility Advisory Committee (ACAC) on February 24, 2015 for its initial review. It was discussed that the name of the Airport in question was recently changed from "Destin-Fort Walton Beach Airport" to the "Destin Executive Airport" and that this change needed to be reflect in the proposed Ordinance. Staff agreed to go back and expand the ordinance to include sections of the LDC that include or mention the name of the Airport.
At its March 24, 2015 meeting, the Destin Airport Compatibility Advisory Committee (ACAC) requested that the following changes be made to the proposed ordinance:
1. Change LDN to DNL although section 7.15.00 of the LDC and if need be, add new sections to the ordinance to accomplish this.
2. On Figure 7.15.08.A remove the map certification block and replace it with information listed in section 7.15.09 Noise Zones. Also, add an asterisk to this information stating "refer to section 7.15.00 of the LDC for more information."
3. Also, add an asterisk to the bottom of the map indicating "Formerly known as Destin-Fort Walton Beach Airport."
III. ORGANIZATIONAL IMPACTS:
A. Link to Strategic Goals I Objectives: Goal 5. Quality Development and Revitalization.
B. Effect on Budget (EOB): None.
C. Level of Service (LOS): None.
Page 2 of3 IV. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY: The modifications to the Land Development Code that are proposed in Ordinance No. 15-03-LC are consistent with Policy 1-3.2.4: Performance Standards of the Comprehensive Plan: 2010 (refer to Exhibit "B").
V. LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY (LPA) DISCUSSION: The Planning Manager read the ordinance title into the record. Staff explained the purpose of the proposed Ordinance No. 14-06- LC to Agency members. The Chairman opened the Public Hearing. There was no one from the public present to speak on the matter. Staff explained that they made all of the changes to the map that the Destin Airport Compatibility Advisory Committee had requested. Mr. Link spoke about why he would not be able to vote in favor of the Ordinance. Mr. Ledbetter made the recommended motion to find proposed Ordinance 15-03-LC consistent with Comprehensive Plan: 2020 and recommend its adoption by the City Council on first reading. The motion was seconded by Mr. Johnson. The vote passed by a vote of 5-l, with Mr. Link voting against the motion.
VI. CONCLUSION: Ordinance 15-03-LC implements an important recommendation of the Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study and provides more up to date guidance, via the map, on what properties around the airport may need aircraft noise mitigation. The Destin ACAC members would like to see the outdated Noise Zone Map replace with the map taken from the Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study report as soon as possible. It also corrects the name of the Airport in the LDC.
VII. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move that the Destin City Council approve proposed Ordinance 15-03-LC on 1st Reading and direct staff to schedule a public hearing for final adoption on 2nd reading."
EXHffiiTS: A. Proposed Ordinance 15-03-LC A.l 2013 Official Noise Exposure Map B. Comprehensive Plan: 2020 Excerpts
Page 3 of3 EXHIBIT A
ORDINANCE NO. 15-03-LC
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DESTIN, FLORIDA RELATING TO AIRCRAFT NOISE ZONES; PROVIDING FOR AUTHORITY; PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS OF FACT; PROVIDING FOR THE AMENDMENT OF SECTION 7.15.01. AIRPORT ZONES AND AIRSPACE HEIGHT LIMITATIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE AMENDMENT OF SECTION 7.15.02. AIRPORT LAND USE RESTRICTIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE AMENDMENT OF SECTION 7.15.07. COMPATffiLE LAND USES; PROVIDING FOR THE AMENDMENT OF SECTION 7.15.08. NOISE ZONES ESTABLISHED; PROVIDING FOR THE CREATION OF FIGURE 7.15.08A. 2013 OFFICIAL NOISE EXPOSURE MAP; PROVIDING FOR THE AMENDMENT OF SECTION 7.15.09. NOISE ZONES-LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF BOUNDARIES; PROVIDING FOR THE AMENDMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 7.15.16. SLR DESIGN REQUIREMENTS-GENERALLY; PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION INTO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DESTIN, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. AUTHORITY. The authority for enactment of this Ordinance is Article 1, Section 1.01(b) of the City Charter, Section 166.021, Florida Statutes and Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes.
SECTION 2. FINDINGS OF FACT.
WHEREAS, the certain residential areas have been developed in close proximity to the Destin Airport; and
WHEREAS, the FAR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study has determined that certain homes and home sites may be subject to aircraft noise incompatible with the residential uses; and
WHEREAS, the FAR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study includes an official noise exposure map; and
WHEREAS, the FAR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study recommends the noise exposure map be included in the Destin Land Development Code section on Airport Zoning; and
WHEREAS, the Inter-local Agreement Between the City of Destin and Okaloosa County regarding Airport Hazard and Incompatible Land Use Zoning states that the City shall update its Airport Zoning regulations to include the noise exposure map; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this ordinance is consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan and is in the best interests of the City and its citizens; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing has been conducted after due public notice by the Destin Local Planning Agency and its recommendations reported to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing has been conducted by the City Council after due public notice. NOTE: Language in sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of this ordinance that is strtwk thfflHgh is language proposed to be deleted, underlined language is language proposed to be added, language that is not stf'l:tek thfflhigh or underlined is not to be changed, and * * * represents sections of the Land Development Code that have been skipped and remain unchanged.
SECTION 3. AMENDMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 7.15.01. AIRPORT ZONES AND AIRSPACE HEIGHT LIMITATIONS. Land Development Code Section 7.15.01. Airport zones and airspace height limitations is hereby amended as follows.
7.15.0 1. Airport zones and airspace height limitations. Certain zones are created and established which include all of the land lying beneath the approach, transitional, horizontal and conical surfaces as they apply to a particular airport. Such zones are shown on the Destin/Fort Walton Beach Zoning, Zoning Map B, by reference.
An area located in more than one of the described zones is considered to be only in the zone with the more restrictive height limitation. The various zones are hereby established and defined as follows:
A. Public civil airport height zones and limitations.
1. Primary zone. An area longitudinally centered on a runway, extending 200 feet beyond each end of that runway with the width so specified for each runway for the most precise approach existing or planned for either end of the runway. No structure or obstruction will be permitted within the primary zone that is not part of the landing and takeoff area and is of a greater height than the nearest point on the runway centerline. The width of the primary zone is as follows:
(a) Destin Fort '.Valton Beach Executive Airport-Runway 14 and 32; 500 feet for non precision instrument runways having visibility minimums greater than three-fourths of a statute mile.
The width of the primary zone of a runway will be that width prescribed in this section for the most precise approach existing or planned for either end of that runway. No structure or obstruction will be permitted within the primary zone that is not part of the landing and takeoff facilities and is of a greater height than the nearest point on the runway centerline.
2. Horizontal zone. The area around each civil airport with an outer boundary the perimeter of which is constructed by swinging arcs of specified radii from the center of each end of the primary zone of each airport's runway and connecting the adjacent arcs by lines tangent to those arcs. The radius of each arc is:
(a) Destin-Fort '.Valton Beach Executive Airport-Runway 14 and 32; 10,000 feet for all runways not designated as utility or visual.
The radius of the arc specified for each end of a runway will have the same arithmetical value. That value will be the highest composite value determined for either end of the runway. When a 5,000-foot arc is encompassed by tangents connecting two adjacent 10,000-foot arcs, the 5,000- foot arc shall be disregarded on the construction of the perimeter of the horizontal zone.
Page 2 of7 No structure or obstruction will be permitted in the horizontal zone that has a height greater than 150 feet above the airport height.
3. Conical zone. The area extending outward from the periphery of the horizontal zone for a distance of 4,000 feet. Height limitations for structures in the conical zone are 150 feet above the airport height at the inner boundary with permitted height increasing one foot vertically for every 20 feet of horizontal distance measured outward from the inner boundary to a height of 350 feet above airport height at the outer boundary.
4. Approach zone. An area longitudinally centered on the extended runway centerline and extending outward from each end of the primary surface. An approach zone is designated for each runway based upon the type of approach available or planned for that runway end.
(a) The inner edge of the approach zone is the same width as the primary zone and it expands uniformly to a width of:
(1) Destin Fort '.\'alton Beaeh Executive Airport-Runway 14 and 32; 3,500 feet for that end of a non-precision instrument runway, other than utility, having visibility minimums greater than three-fourths of a statute mile.
(b) The approach surface extends for a horizontal distance of:
(1) Destin Fort Walton Beaeh Executive Airport-Runway 14 and 32; 10,000 feet for all non-precision instrument runways other than utility.
(c) The outer width of an approach zone to an end of a runway will be that width prescribed in this subsection for the most precise approach existing or planned for that runway end.
(d) Permitted height limitation within the approach zones is the same as the runway end height at the inner edge and increases with horizontal distance outward from the inner edge as follows:
(1) Destin Fort Walton Beaeh Executive Airport-Runway 14 and 32; permitted height increases one foot vertically for every 34 feet of horizontal distance for all non precision instrument runways other than utility.
5. Transitional zone. The area extending outward from the sides of the primary zone and approach zones connecting them to the horizontal zone. Height limits within the transitional zone are the same as the primary zone or approach zone at the boundary line where it adjoins and increases at a rate of one foot vertically for every seven feet horizontally, with the horizontal distance measured at right angles to the runway centerline and extended centerline, until the height matches the height of the horizontal zone or conical zone or for a horizontal distance of 5,000 feet from the side of the part of the precision approach zone that extends beyond the conical zone.
6. Other areas. In addition to the height limitations imposed in paragraphs 1 through 5 above, no structure or obstruction will be permitted within the city that is outside of a federal reservation and would cause a minimum obstruction clearance altitude, a minimum descent altitude, a minimum vectoring altitude, or a decision height to be raised.
Page 3 of7 SECTION 4. AMENDMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 7.15.02. AIRPORT LAND USE RESTRICTIONS. Land Development Code Section 7.15.02. Airport land use restrictions is hereby amended as follows.
7.15. 02. Ai1port land use restrictions. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this article, no use may be made of land or water within any zones established by this article in such a manner as to interfere with the operation of an airborne aircraft. Any proposed development which would encroach upon the proposed expansion area of the Destin Executive Airport shall be approved (or not objected to) by the Okaloosa County government, in writing, in advance of the issuance of the final development order by the city. Evidence from Okaloosa County shall be required from any applicant proposing development within the proposed expansion areas as shown on figure 7.15.02A. The following special requirements shall apply to each permitted use:
A. All lights or illumination used in conjunction with streets, parking, signs or use of land and structures shall be arranged and operated in such a manner that it is not misleading or dangerous to aircraft operating from a public airport or in the vicinity thereof.
B. No operations shall produce smoke, glare or other visual hazards within three statute miles of any usable runway of a public airport.
C. No operations shall produce electronic interference with navigation signals or radio communication between the airport and aircraft.
D. Sanitary landfills will be considered as an incompatible use if located within areas established for the airport through the application of the following criteria:
1. Landfills located within 10,000 feet of any runway used or planned to be used by turbojet or turboprop aircraft.
2. Landfills located within 5,000 feet of any runway used only by piston type aircraft.
3. Landfills outside the above perimeters but within conical surfaces described by Federal Air Regulation (FAR) Part 77 and applied to an airport will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis.
4. Any landfill located so that it places the runway and/or approach and departure patterns of an airport between bird feeding, watering or roosting areas.
SECTION 5. AMENDMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 7.15.07. COMPATffiLE LAND USES. Land Development Code Section 7.15.07. Compatible land uses is hereby amended as follows.
7.15.07. Compatible land uses.
A. Purpose. It is hereby declared that the purpose of this article is to provide for the health, safety and welfare of the general public located in proximity to the Destin- Fort Walton Beach Executive Airport by establishing standards for land use and for sound level reduction requirements with respect to exterior noise resulting from the legal and normal operations at the Destin Fort Walton Beach Executive Airport. This article establishes noise zones of differing intensities and land use in the vicinity of Destin Fort Walton Beach Executive Airport, establishes permitted land uses in the noise zones, and establishes notification procedures to prospective purchasers of real estate within the noise zones.
Page 4 of7 SECTION 6. AMENDMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 7.15.08. NOISE ZONES ESTABLISHED. Land Development Code Section 7.15.08. Noise zones established is hereby amended as follows.
7.15.08. Noise zones established. There are established by the city three land use noise zones: zone A, zone B, and zone C. Such zones are shown on the airport maps for the county ·.vhich are made a part hereto by reference FIGURE 7.15.08A. 2013 OFFICIAL NOISE EXPOSURE MAP and are described in section 7.15.09. The noise zones contained herein are based on a projection of future noise environments arising from aircraft flight operations at Destin Fort Walton Beach Executive Airport through the year WOO.
A. Zone A. A land use noise zone is hereby established and designated as zone A, being that area commencing at the outermost boundary of the airport and extending outward therefrom to a boundary indicated on the noise zone map as "B" and as described in section 7.15.09. The outer boundary of noise zone A approximates a noise level of 75 bdn DNL (day/night average sound line).
B. Zone B. A land use noise zone is hereby established and designated as zone B, being that area commencing at a boundary indicated on the noise zone A and extending outward therefrom to a boundary indicated on the noise zone map as "C" and as described in section 7.15.09. The outer contour of noise zone B approximates a noise level of 70 bdn DNL.
C. Zone C. A land use noise zone is hereby established and designated as zone C, being that area commencing at a boundary indicated on the noise zone map as the outer boundary of noise zone B and extending outward therefrom to the furthermost boundary indicated on the noise zone map and as described in section 7.15.09. The outer contour of noise zone C approximates a noise level of 65 bdn DNL.
SECTION 7. CREATION OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FIGURE 7.15.08.A 2013 OFFICIAL NOISE EXPOSURE MAP. Land Development Code Section Figure 7.15.08A. 2013 Official Noise Exposure Map is hereby created as follows.
FIGURE 7.15.08A. 2013 OFFICIAL NOISE EXPOSURE MAP
(insert Exhibit A.1 here)
***
SECTION 8. AMENDMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 7.15.09. NOISE ZONES-LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF BOUNDARIES. Section 7.15.09. Noise Zones - Legal Description of boundaries is hereby amended as follows.
7.15.09. Noise Zones- ~Description of boundaries.
A. Zone A (75 bdn DNL and above). Noise zone A applies to an area of 75 bdn DNL entirely within the Destin Fort Walton Beach Executive Airport and surrounding runway 14-32 at various depths as per the 2013 OFFICIAL NOISE EXPOSURE MAP.
Page 5 of7 B. Zone B (70 ~::6ft DNL to 75 ~::6ft DNL). Noise zone B applies to an area of 70 ~::6ft DNL surrounding the Destin Fort Walton Beach Executive Airport, more partioolarly described as follows: legal deseriptions as per composite appendix 4, made a part hereof by referenee, and noise zone map the 2013 OFFICIAL NOISE EXPOSURE MAP.
C. Zone C (65 ~::6ft DNL to 70 ~::6ft DNL). Noise zone C applies to an area of 65 ~::6ft DNL surrounding the Destin Fort Walton Beaeh Executive Airport, HlOre particularly described as follmvs: legal deseriptions as per composite appendix 4, made a part hereof by referer1ee, and noise zone map the 2013 OFFICIAL NOISE EXPOSURE MAP.
SECTION 9. AMENDMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 7.15.16. SLR DESIGN REQUIREMENTS-GENERALLY. Section 7.15.16. SLR design requirements-Generally is hereby amended as follows.
7.15.16. SLR design requirements-Generally. The SLR requirements may be achieved by any suitable combination of building design, choice of building materials and execution of construction details in accordance with established architectural and acoustical principles. The SLR requirements shall apply to all occupied rooms having one or more exterior walls or ceilings, when furnished in accordance with the intended final usage of the room.
TABLEt Land Use Noise Zones Noise Zones Located in Overflight Areas Activities and /or A B c A B c Land Uses 75 tan DNL 70-75 tan DNL 65-70 tan DNL 75 tan DNL 70-75 tan DNL 65-70 tan DNL *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
SECTION 10. INCORPORATION INTO DESTIN LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. This ordinance shall be incorporated into the City of Destin's Land Development Code and any section or paragraph number or letter and any heading may be changed or modified as necessary to effectuate the foregoing.
SECTION 11. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special Acts of the Florida Legislature applicable to the incorporated area of the City of Destin, City Ordinances and City Resolutions, or parts, thereof, in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict.
SECTION 12. SEVERABILITY. Each separate provision of this ordinance is deemed independent of all other provisions herein so that if any portion or provision of this ordinance is declared invalid, all other provisions thereof shall remain valid and enforceable.
Page 6 of7 SECTION 13. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall become effective upon its adoption by the City Council and signature by the Mayor.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF DESTIN CITY COUNCILTHIS DAYOF ______
By: ~~~--~------"Mel" Ponder, Mayor
ATTEST: The form and legal sufficiency of the foregoing has been reviewed and approved by the City Land Use Attorney.
Rey Bailey, City Clerk Scott Shirley, City Land Use Attorney
First Reading: Second Reading:
Page 7 of7 EXHIBIT "A:. f ''
2013 Official Noise Exposure Map Figure 7 .15.08A
A. Zone A (75 DNL and above). Noise zone A applies loan area or75 DNL ealirely •ilhia lhe Deslin Euculive Airport and sarroundlnc ranway 14-32 al various depths.
B. Zone B (70 DNL lo 75 DNL). Noise zone B applies loan area or70 DNL surrounding the Deslio Eucnlive Airport.
C. Zoae C (65 DNL lo 70 DNL). Noise zo.w C appln lo aa areaor65 DNL surroundloc die Deslia Esecali¥e Airport 0 * rerer to section 7.15.09 orthe City's Land Developmnl Code.
THE LPA Destin Executive Airport * GROUP TRANSPODATION CONSULTANTS FAR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study • Formerly Destin-Fort Walton Beach Airport EXHIBIT B
Comprehensive Plan Policies Pertaining to Ordinance 15-03-LC
Policy 1-3.2.4: Performance Standards. The following performance standards incorporated in the LDC shall be updated and refined as needed to reflect accepted best management principles and practices. Plan review functions shall be carried out by the City Manager or designee, using, as needed, other professionals with demonstrated expertise required to effectively analyze proposed development. The land development code shall include measures to implement the provisions of the Housing, Public Facility, Conservation and Coastal Management, and Capital Improvements Elements, including wetland protection, open space preservation, potable well field protection, stormwater management, control of sedimentation and soil erosion, and other applicable policies requiring implementation through the land development code. New residential development shall incorporate noise level reduction in Aircraft Noise Zones B, C and D as indicated on Map 1-7.
Please note: ZoneD, referenced on Map 1-7 is no longer applicable subsequent to the most recent Environmental Impact Study for Eglin aircraft operations. Committee Volunteer Application PLEASE PRINT
NAME: J"O.;ce fl. l/ufl1be V' HOME ADDREss: 'lti!i rpor-1 !3 b5t/n, PL 3;2=>-'1; lb /(~ /Jn;t /~ 7 MAILING ADDRESS (if different from above): ______
Home Phone: Business Phone: Cell Phone: ~52>-- £/9?- 7tJ5" ~ (These numbers are used to contact you for interviews, special meetings, and courtesy calls. If you wish that they not be given out or if unlisted, please so indicate.)
Email Address: {J i h ;q~ Jt!) Cf; X. net Fax Number: {J If necessary, how is it best to contact you during the day? BusinessName: ______
Office Address: ------
Are you a registered voter in Okaloosa County? YES / NO How long have you lived in Destin? YRS MO Are you currently a resident of Destin? YES ± NO Do you hold a public office? YES NO ~ Have you ever been convicted of a felony? YES NO If yes, please explain and give date(s). ------
At the present time, do you serve on any City Board, Commission, or CommiHee? ~..¥-.lo:.J.:_r1 e._ If yes, which one(s)?
Page4 of 6 Please indicate the board, commission, or committee on which you are interested in serving.
__ Airport Compatibility Advisory __ Harbor CRA Advisory Committee / Committee v Board of Adjustment Environmental/Tree Committee __ Harbor & Waterways Board Code Enforcement Board __ Local Planning Agency __ Construction Regulation Board Public Works/Public Safety Recreation Committee __ Town Center CRA Advisory Committee Harbor CRA Advisory Committee
List your qualification to serve on the above organization(s): Eo r Crl_ e y: m em 6e r: l> f fLO 8 f{)ctl n s-tr~.:+ [) r va nrzafl Sh-.,
Why are you especially qualified to serve on this Committee/Board? -x---:------; 5~ r Vt> o{ on VCA r 1'ou S boar d_s ._.Gr &_4-_j tJ-f u) f3
What do you see as the major purpose of this Committee/Board? ______Re ':/£ uJ .-+ rl'L-t ~ le wm rl1"- n cldio n s Ulnl'elru' n_q U"~ ~ re :lu' :;,led -to bt Would you considering serving an organization other than one(s) you indicated above? _Jfo Additional comments you would like to add: PageS of 6 HAVE YOU PREVIOUSLY DISCUSS THIS APPLICATION WITH ANY MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL? I !FSO,VVHO?-+~r------ MY SIGNATURE BELOW INDICATES MY DESIRE TO SERVE THE CITY OF DESTIN IN A VOLUNTARY CAPACITY AS A MEMBER OF ONE OF ITS BOARDS, COMMITTEES, PANELS, OR COMMISSIONS. IT ALSO CONFIRMS MY UNDERSTANDING OF THE MEETING TIMES AND ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS, AND VVHERE APPLICABLE, THE REQUIREMENT TO FILE AN ANNUAL FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE FORM. Signature 1 /Date Please return completed form to the City Clerk in person or by mail to 4200 Indian Bayou Trail, Destin, FL 32541, or by fax to (850) 837-3267. Page 6 of 6 ITEM# /7 CITY OF DESTIN AGENDA ITEM COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 6, 2014 TYPE OF AGENDA ITEM: Staff Report TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: City Manager/Greg Kisela-}.._ ~ FROM: Parks & Recreation Director/Lance Johnson ~ DATE: July 6, 2015 SUBJECT: Friends of the Destin Dog Park fundraising and projects update. I. BACKGROUND: The partnership between the City and the "Friends of the Destin Dog Park" (Friends) continues to be a very good example of how public/private partnership can benefit our community. The "Friends" remain actively involved in efforts to maintain and improve the current facility through volunteering and fundraising. Now that the Dog Park lighting project has been completed, the "Friends" are focused on other projects and how they can be funded. The following is for informational purposes only. II. DISCUSSION: The "Friends" have identified several improvement projects (Atch 1) that they would like to help implement and fund. Currently the installation of grass-pavers in the heavy traffic areas is the highest priority on their list. Installation of such pavers will help mitigate the wear on high traffic turf areas, provide a safer surface and will be more aesthetically pleasing than bare dirt. The cost of this project will be approximately $10,000 which the "Friends" plan to offset by securing grants and sponsorships from area businesses and residents. Although donations of any denomination are always welcomed, businesses and residents willing to sponsor this project for a minimum contribution of $500 will be recognized with a tasteful plaque mounted within the park. All sponsorship plaques will meet the current regulations for signs of this nature. A. Link to Strategic Goals /Objectives: Expanded Community Amenities for Residents and Guests B. Effect on Budget (EOB): Other than staff assistance, the projects will not impact the current budget. The "Friends" intend to raise the funds required to complete each project. C. Level of Service (LOS): Completion of this project will increase our current level of service by providing a safer, more aesthetically pleasing facility with additional amenities. III. CONCLUSION: The "Friends of the Destin Dog Park" are asking for Council's endorsement to pursue sponsorships for these projects beginning with the installation of grass pavers in the heavy traffic areas. Representatives of the group are available to answer any questions. IV. RECOMMENDED MOTION: No motion required. Attachments: 1) Friends project list. Destin Dog Park Improvement Projects 1. Install approximately 1,800 sq. ft. of permeable pavers at the entrance to large dog park to cover the dirt which has resulted from the heavy foot traffic killing the grass in this area. An estimated cost for this project is $10,000. The image below shows the type of paversthat would be used in the park. This is our highest priority project. 2. Install a french drain around the drinking feature in the small dog park similar to the one installed in the large dog park. The cost of this project is simply the supplies. The estimated cost is $500 based up on the previous cost. 3. Need to plant 6 more trees. Three in the small dog park which needs more shade and three in the large dog park which lost 3 trees due to disease. An estimated cost for this project is $2,160 (based on a cost of $360 per tree). 4. The largest item is to build an additional park on the adjacent property next to the small dog park that would be approximately Y2 acre in size. This park would contain agility equipment for dog training, as well as, be used as an alternate park when either the small or large dog park needs to be closed for maintenance. This park would accommodate the rotation of the dog parks in order to allow the grass in the closed park time to recover from heavy foot traffic. An estimated cost for this project is $8,000-$9,000 for the fencing and another $10,000-$12,000 for training equipment. TO: Destin City Council FROM: Barbara Telford & Nancy Weidenhamer SUBJECT: Request Approval of Community Sponsorships DATE: July 6, 2015 Friends of the Destin Dog Park requests City Council approval to obtain sponsorships from community businesses. These sponsorships will be used to help fund the attached list of pending park improvement projects. Sponsorship of the Dog Park is a $500 monetary donation. In recognition of sponsorship, each sponsor will receive a 2 x 2 sign displaying their name and logo along the fence inside of the Dog Park. The funding from sponsorships will be placed in a Dog Park improvements account. ITEM# /B CITY OF DESTIN AGENDA ITEM COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 06, 2015 TYPE OF AGENDA ITEM: Staff Report & Recommendation TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: City Manager/Greg Kisela.,(_ ~ FROM: Finance Director/Bragg Farmer~~ DATE: June 26, 2015 SUBJECT: Establishment of the FY2016 Tentative Millage Rate and Budget Public Hearing Dates I. BACKGROUND: Table 1 -Determination of Millage Chapter 200 of the Florida 1. Day 1 is on or by July 1 -(July 1) The Property Appraiser certifies the taxable value of real Statues "Determination of property within the jurisdiction of the taxing authority. Millage" sets a statutory 2. Within 35 days- (by August 4) the City shall advise the Property Appraiser of: a) timetable for the calculation proposedltentati ve millage rate; b) current year rolled-back rate - the rolled back rate is the and notification to the public tax rate that would raise the same amount of revenue as last year using the increased taxable of the process to set ad value; and c) date, time and place of tentative budget hearings. 3. 55th day- (by August 24) No later than 55 days after certification of value, the Property valorem tax millage rates and Appraiser shall mail out to the City and the property owners a Notice of Proposed Property adopt a budget. The statute Taxes (TRIM Notice). identifies the time frames and 4. 80th day- (September 3 - 18) - (Sept. 8) No earlier than 65 days after certification, but briefly describes the tasks to within 80 days of certification of value, the City shall hold a public hearing on the tentative budget and proposed millage rate. be accomplished during that 5. 95th day- (September 8 - September 23)- (Sept. 16) within 15 days of the tentative budget timeframe (see Table 1). hearing, the City shall advertise its intent to adopt a final millage and budget. 6. 97th to lOOth day- (September 12 to October 3)- (Sept. 21) A public hearing to adopt a II. DISCUSSION: final millage rate and budget that shall be held not less than 2 days or more than 5 days, · Staff has received the 2015 after the day that the advertisement is first published. 7. Within 3 days of the second and final budget hearing- (Sept. 24) The resolution or Certification of Taxable Value ordinance adopting the final millage rate shall be forwarded to the Property Appraiser and (form DR-420) from the the Tax Collector. County Appraiser. The 8. The Property Appraiser notifies the City of the final adjusted tax roll. 9 Within 30 days of the final hearing- (Oct. 21) No later than 30 days following the adoption preliminary gross taxable · of the millage and budget ordinances or resolutions, each City shall certify that they have property value is complied with the provision of Chapter 200, F.S., to the Division of ad valorem Tax, $4,283,393,138, representing D artment of Revenue. an increase of $252,757,798 (6.27%) from the 2014 Final Gross Taxable Property Value of $4,030,635,340. The City must notify the County Property Appraiser within 35 days (August 5) of receiving this certification of taxable value, of its calculated rolled-back rate, its tentative millage rate, and the date of the City's first public hearing for the budget. Rolled Back Rate: The rolled-back rate is defmed as the millage rate that would produce the same amount of ad valorem tax revenue as was levied during the prior year, exclusive of new construction, deletions, and boundary changes. Staff has calculated the rolled-back rate to be 1.5249 mills, which would generate revenues of$6,531,746. ITEM# ___ Tentative Millage: The tentative millage rate is important because once it is set it cannot be increased without the additional expense of the formal notification process to each city taxpayer. Staff is in the process of formulating the proposed Budget for FY2016. The proposed budget is being developed based upon retaining a millage rate of 1.500 mills which incorporates capital and infrastructure improvements and maintenance. In prior years, Council set the tentative millage rate higher than previous years' adopted millage, in order to provide themselves with some flexibility during the budget review process should they decide they didn't want to accept certain revenue proposals or wanted to add additional capital projects. Setting the tentative millage rate at 1.500 mills will produce approximately $6,425,090 in ad valorem revenues which represents $379,137 more tax revenue than FY2015. The budgeted amount of$6,103,836 represents 95% of the gross ad valorem taxes. Budget Public Hearings: Per Florida Statutes, the City must hold public hearings on the budget and the City's meetings may not be on the same date as that of that of the County or the School Board. There is no conflict for this year's budget hearings. The first budget hearing will be held during the regularly held City Council meeting on September 8th while the second public hearing will be held during the regular City Council meeting on September 21st. The City is required to notify the Property Appraiser of the date and time of the City's first public hearing on the budget and this date is printed on the tax bills. Any change in the meeting time for the first public hearing on the budget will require notice to each City property taxpayer. Staff requests that Council set the public hearing dates for the FY2016 Budget as follows: • Regular Council Meeting, Tuesday, September 08, 2015-6:00 pm • Regular Council Meeting, Tuesday, September 21,2015-6:00 pm According to the information currently available to the City our budget hearing dates do not conflict with the meeting dates of the Okaloosa County School Board or Okaloosa County. The School Board is holding their budget meetings on July 2ih and September 14th. The dates for Okaloosa County's budget public hearings are September I st and September 15th. A. Link to Strategic Goals I Objectives: Develop a sustainable Operating and Capital Budget ensuring the City is managed in a fiscally sound manner and complies with Legislative mandates. B. Effect on Budget (EOB): The adoption of the tentative millage rate is the first step in approving the FY2016 budget. This has no effect on our current budget. C. Level of Service: This will set the primary funding source for the FY20 16 budget. III. CONCLUSION: Staff respectfully requests that Council set the FY2016 tentative millage rate for ad valorem taxes at 1.500 mills and confirm the date and times of the public hearings for the budget listed above. IV. RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move that Council set the tentative millage rate for ad valorem taxes at 1.500 mills which is less than the rollback rate of 1.5249 mills and confirm the date and times of the public hearings for the FY2016 Budget for September 8th and 21 5\2015 at 6:00PM. Attachment: A. 2015 Certificate ofTaxable Value (DR-420) 2015 Certificate ofTaxable Value (DR-420TIF) Reset Form I I Print Form !.0 DR-420 .'...li CERTIFICATION OF TAXABLE VALUE R. 5/12 sI Rule 12D-16.002 1 Florida Administrative Code FLORIDA Effective 11/12 Year: 2015 County: OKALOOSA Principal Authority : Taxing Authority: CITY OF DESTIN CITY OF DESTIN SECTION I: COMPLETED BY PROPERTY APPRAISER 1. Current year taxable value of real property for operating purposes $ 4,200,186,464 (1) 2. Current year taxable value of personal property for operating purposes $ 83,206,674 (2) 3. Current year taxable value of centrally assessed property for operating purposes $ 0 (3) 4. Current year gross taxable value for operating purposes (Line 7 plus Line 2 plus Line 3) $ 4,283,393,138 (4) Current year net new taxable value (Add new construction, additions, rehabilitative 5. improvements increasing assessed value by at least 100%, annexations, and tangible $ 34,494,387 (5) personal property value over 115% of the previous year's value. Subtract deletions.) 6. Current year adjusted taxable value (Line 4 minus Line 5) $ 4,248,898,751 (6) 7. Prior year FINAL gross taxable value from prior year applicable Form DR-403 series $ 4,030,987,658 (7) Does the taxing authority include tax increment financing areas? If yes, enter number Number 8. 0YES NO (8) of worksheets (DR-420TIF) attached. If none, enter 0 D 2 Does the taxing authority levy a voted debt service millage or a millage voted for 2 Number 9. years or less under s. 9(b), Article VII, State Constitution? If yes, enter the number of D YES 0 NO (9) DR-420DEBT, Certification of Voted Debt Millage forms attached.lf none, enter 0 0 Property Appraiser Certification 11 certify the taxable values above are correct to the best of my knowledge. SIGN Signature of Property Appraiser: Date: HERE Electronically Certified by Property Appraiser 6/24/2015 5:02PM SECTION II : COMPLETED BY TAXING AUTHORITY If this portion of the form is not completed in FULL your taxing authority will be denied TRIM certification and possibly lose its millage levy privilege for the tax year. If any line is not applicable, enter -o-. Prior year operating millage levy (If prior year millage was adjusted then use adjusted 10. per $1,000 (10) millage from Form DR-422) 1.5000 11. Prior year ad valorem proceeds (Line 7 multiplied by Line 70, divided by 7,000) $ 6,046,481 (11) Amount, if any, paid or applied in prior year as a consequence of an obligation measured by a 12. $ (12) dedicated increment value (Sum of either Lines 6c or Line la for all DR-420TIF forms) 0 13. Adjusted prior year ad valorem proceeds (Line 7 7 minus Line 72) $ 6,046,481 (13) 14. Dedicated increment value, if any (Sum of either Line 6b or Line lefor all DR-420TIF forms) $ 283,722,607 (14) 15. Adjusted current year taxable value (Line 6 minus Line 74) $ 3,965,176,144 (15) 16. Current year rolled-back rate (Line 73 divided by Line 75, multiplied by 7,000) 1.5249 per$1000 (16) 17. Current year proposed operating millage rate 1.5000 per $1000 (17) Total taxes to be levied at proposed millage rate (Line 77 multiplied by Line 4, divided (18) 18. by 7,000) $ 6,425,090 Continued on page 2 DR-420 R. 5/12 Page2 County D Independent Special District TYPE of principal authority (check one) D 19. (19) 0 Municipality D Water Management District Applicable taxing authority (check one) 0 Principal Authority D Dependent Special District 20. (20) 0MSTU D Water Management District Basin 21. Is millage levied in more than one county? (check one) DYes 0 No (21) 22. Enter the total adjusted prior year ad valorem proceeds of the principal authority, all <>n<>nn<>nr special districts, and MSTUs levying a millage. (The sum ofLine 73 from all DR-420 $ 6,046,481 (22) 23. urrent year aggregate rolled-back rate (Line 22 divided by Line 15, multiplied by 1,000) 1.5249 per $1,000 (23) 24. urrent year aggregate rolled-back taxes (Line 4 multiplied by Line 23, divided by 1,000) $ 6,531,746 (24) Enter total of all operating ad valorem taxes proposed to be levied by the principal 25. ng authority, all dependent districts, and MSTUs, if any. (The sum of Line 18 from all $ 6,425,090 (25) •vrr·-r.£vforms) year proposed aggregate millage rate (Line 25 divided by Line 4, multiplied 26. per $1,000 (26) 1,000) 1.5000 urrent year proposed rate as a percent change of rolled-back rate (Line 26 divided by 27. • -1.63% (27) 23, mmus 1, multiplied by 100) Date: Time: First public Place: budget hearing I certify the millages and rates are correct to the best of my e. Taxing Authority Certification The millages comply with the provisions of s. 200.065 and the provisions of s either s. 200.071 or s. 200.081, F.S. I Signature of Chief Administrative Officer: Date: G N Title: Contact Name and Contact Title : BRAGG FARMER, FINANCE DIRECTOR GREG KISELA CITY MANAGER H E Mailing Address: Physical Address : R 4200 INDIAN BAYOU TRAIL 4200 INDIAN BAYOU TRAIL E City, State, Zip: Phone Number: Fax Number: DESTIN, FL 32541 850.337.3146 850.269.9890 Instructions on page 3 j Reset Form PrintForm DR-420TIF ~ R. 6/10 Rule 12D-16.002 TAX INCREMENT ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Florida Administrative Code QI ll Effective 11112 FLORIDA Year: 2015 County: OKALOOSA Principal Authority : Taxing Authority : CITY OF DESTIN CITY OF DESTIN Community Redevelopment Area : Base Year: Destin Town Center (DR) 1998 ON I : COMPLETED BY PROPERTY APPRAISER Current year taxable value in the tax increment area $ 213,616,295 (1) Base year taxable value in the tax increment area $ 94,996,840 (2) urrent year tax increment value (Line 1 minus Line 2) $ 118,619,455 (3) 4. Prior year Final taxable value in the tax increment area $ 201,762,143 (4) 5. Prior year tax increment value (Line 4 minus Line 2) $ 106,765,303 (5) Property Appraiser Certification I certify the taxable values above are correct to the best of my knowledge. SIGN HERE Signature of Property Appraiser : Date: Electronically Certified by Property Appraiser 6/24/2015 5:02 PM 6.1f the amount to be paid to the redevelopment trust fund IS BASED on a specific proportion of the tax increment value: 6a. Enter the proportion on which the payment is based. 100.00 % (6a) IUe!Oic:ate!O increment value (Line 3 multiplied by the percentage on Line 6a) 6b. $ 118,619,455 (6b) If value is zero or less than zero, then enter zero on Line 6b 6c. unt of payment to redevelopment trust fund in prior year $ 0 (6c) 7.1f the amount to be paid to the redevelopment trust fund IS NOT BASED on a specific proportion of the tax increment value: 7a. Amount of payment to redevelopment trust fund in prior year $ 0 (7a) 7b. Prior year operating millage levy from Form DR-420, Line 10 0.0000 per $1,000 (7b) Taxes levied on prior year tax increment value 7c. $ (7c) (Line 5 multiplied by Line lb, divided by 1,000) 0 Prior year payment as proportion of taxes levied on increment value 7d. % (7d) (Line la divided by Line lc, multiplied by 100) 0.00 increment value (Line 3 multiplied by the percentage on Line ld) 7e. $ (7e) If value is zero or less than zero, then enter zero on Line 7e 0 ng Authority Certification I certify t he calculations, millages and rates are correct to the best of my knowledge. s Signature of Chief Administrative Officer: Date: I G Title : Contact Name and Contact Title: N GREG KISELA CITY MANAGER BRAGG FARMER, FINANCE DIREGOR H Mailing Address: Physical Address : E 4200 INDIAN BAYOU TRAIL 4200 INDIAN BAYOU TRAIL R E City, State, Zip : Phone Number: Fax Number: DESTIN, FL 32541 850.33 7.3146 850.269.9890 ~ DR-420TIF 5 Reset Form PrinHorm I "'_ R. 6/10 I ~ Rule 12D-16.002 I i TAX INCREMENT ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Florida Administrative Code II.s Effective 11/12 FLORIDA Year : 2015 County: OKALOOSA Principal Authority : Taxing Authority : CITY OF DESTIN CITY OF DESTIN Community Redevelopment Area : Base Year : Destin Harbor (DH) 2003 SECTION I: COMPLETED BY PROPERTY APPRAISER 1. Current year taxable value in the tax increment area $ 361,353,713 (1) 2. Base year taxable value in the tax increment area $ 196,250,561 (2) 3. Current year tax increment value (Line 1 minus Line 2) $ 165,103,152 (3) 4. Prior year Final taxable value in the tax increment area $ 350,370,733 (4) 5. Prior year tax increment value (Line 4 minus Line 2) $ 154,120,172 (5) Property Appraiser Certification j1 certify the taxable values above are correct to the best of my knowledge. SIGN HERE Signature of Property Appraiser : Date: Electronically Certified by Property Appraiser 6/24/2015 5:02 PM 0 ii - ·'I!!'' _ ' ,, .. .. .- ~ ~ SE~U?fi lltCO~Pj.6l,el); BY2 ~ . * '- !UTY,QC ~·~Eft'ltrt• f~OJ'( " ~J•Y.QQ NO'[Iccnnp 1 6.1f the amount to be paid to the redevelopment trust fund IS BASED on a specific proportion of the tax increment value: 6a. Enter the proportion on which the payment is based. 100.00 % (6a) Dedicated increment value (Line 3 multiplied by the percentage on Line 6a) 6b. $ (6b) If value is zero or less than zero, then enter zero on Line 6b 165,1 03,152 6c. Amount of payment to redevelopment trust fund in prior year $ 0 (6c) 7. 1f the amount to be paid to the redevelopment trust fund IS NOT BASED on a specific proportion of the tax increment value: 7a. Amount of payment to redevelopment trust fund in prior year $ 0 (7a) 7b. Prior year operating millage levy from Form DR-420, Line 10 0.0000 per $1,000 (7b) Taxes levied on prior year tax increment value ?c. $ (7c) (Line 5 multiplied by Line lb, divided by 1,000) 0 Prior year payment as proportion of taxes levied on increment value 7d. 0.00 % (7d) (Line la divided by Line lc, multiplied by 100) Dedicated increment value (Line 3 multiplied by the percentage on Line ld) 7e. $ 0 (7e) If value is zero or less than zero, then enter zero on Line 7e Taxing Authority Certification / I certify the calculations, mlllages and rates are correct to the best of my knowledge. s Signature of Chief Administrative Officer: Date: I G Title : Contact Name and Contact Title : N GREG KISELA CITY MANAGER BRAGG FARMER, FINANCE DIRECTOR H Mailing Address: Physical Address : E 4200 INDIAN BAYOU TRAIL 4200 INDIAN BAYOU TRAIL R E City, State, Zip : Phone Number: Fax Number : DESTIN, FL 32541 850.337.3146 850.269.9890