DOCSLIB.ORG

The Geostrategic Environs and Foreign Policy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Notes CHAPTER 1: THE GEOSTRATEGIC ENVIRONS AND FOREIGN POLICY I. Hedley Bull, 'The Third World and International Society ', The Yearbook of World Affairs, 1979 (London: The London Institute of World Affairs, 1979), pp. 15-31 (see p. 15). 2. See, for example, W. R. Thompson, 'The Regional Subsystem', International Studies Quarterly (17, 1, March 1973), pp. 89-1 17. 3. M. Singer, Weak States in a World ofPowers: The Dynamics ofInternational Relationship (New York: The Free Press, 1972); Robert A. Mortimer, The Third World Coalition in International Politics (Boulder: Westview Press, 1984); Helge Hveem, 'Small Countries under Great Pressure: The Politics of National Vulnerability during International Restructuring', Cooperation and Conflict (XXII, 4, 1987), pp. 193-208; and David Vital, The Inequality of States: A Study of the Small Power in International Relations (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967). 4. Carsten Holbread, Middle Powers in International Politics (London: Macmillan, 1984); Stephen P. Cohen , 'Toward a Great State in Asia ', in Onkar Marwah and J. D. Pollack (eds), Military Power and Policy in Asian States: China, India, Japan (Boulder: Westview Press, 1980), pp. 9-41. 5. See, R. Keohane and J. Nye, Power and Interdependence (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1977); S. P. Huntington, 'Transnational Organiza­ tions in World Politics', World Politics (24, 3, 1973), pp. 333-368; J. Herz, 'The Territorial State Revisited : Reflections on the Future of the Nation State ', in James Rosenau (ed.), International Politics and Foreign Policy (New York: The Free Press, 1969), pp. 76-89. 6. For a review of major approaches and perspectives on foreign policy , sec, Michael Clarke and Brian White (eds), Understanding Foreign Policy (AI­ dershot , Hants: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, 1989). 7. Mohammad Ayoob, 'The Third World in the System of States: Acute Schizo­ phrenia or Growing Pains?' International Studies Quarterly (33, I, March 1989), pp. 67-79. 8. Caroline Thomas, In Search of Security: The Third World in International Relations (Boulder: Rienner, 1987), p. 5. 9. Mustafa Chaudhary, 'Dynamics of Super Power-Small Power Relation ship ', in Syed Farooq Hasnat and Anton Pelinka (eds), Security for the Weak Nations : A Multiple Perspective (Lahore: Izharsons, 1986), pp. 31-9 (see p.38). 10. Hedley Bull, 'The Revolt Against the West', in Hedley Bull and Adam Watson (cds), The Expansion of International Society (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989), pp. 217-28; see also, Peter Lyon, 'The Emergence of the Third World ', in ibid., pp. 229-37. II. Yezid Sayigh, Confronting the 1990s: Security in the Developing Countries, Adelph i Paper No. 251 (London: IISS, 1990), p. 52. 163 164 Notes to Chapter 2 12. Sri Lanka was the chairman of NAM when this application was made and it actively supported Pakistan's case. 13. The African countries whose heads of state/government visited Pakistan included Algeria, Djibouti, Guinea, Kenya, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, So­ malia, Sudan, Zambia, Zimbabwe. The visits in connection with the 2nd Islamic conference, held at Lahore in 1974, are not included. See also chapter on Pakistan's relations with the Muslim world for more visits from Africa. 14. Pakistan extended humanitarian assistance from time to time. Some such instances were: a gift of 5000 tons of rice to Niger (1975), and 500 tons of rice to Seychelles on the eve of its independence (1976); a grant of Rs 1 million to Mozambique to enable it to overcome the negative consequences of appli­ cation of sanctions against Rhodesia (1976); $44 000 for African refugees (1981); rice, wheat flour and other food aid worth 4 million dollars for the famine stricken people (1985); food, clothing and medicine for refugees (1986); relief goods for Uganda (1986); interest-free loan of Rs 50 million to Uganda (1987); another interest-free loan worth 2.45 million dollars to Guinea Bissau (1989). 15. Pakistan is also critical of superpower efforts to deploy offensive weapons in outer space. 16. See the address of Pakistan's Foreign Minister to the UN Conference on Disarmament. Muslim, 1 August 1986; the statement of Pakistan's Minister of State for Foreign Affairs to the UN Conference on Disarmament and Development: Dawn, 27 August 1987. CHAPTER 2: PAKISTAN AND INDIA 1. See, for example, S. M. Burke, Mainsprings ofIndian and Pakistani Foreign Policies (Minneapolis:Universityof MinnesotaPress 1974);Sharif-al Mujahid, 'India-Pakistan Relations, in Latif Ahmad Sherwani, et. al., Foreign Policy of Pakistan (Karachi: Allies Book Corporation), pp. 31-48. 2. Such a point of view is often projected by North Indian political analysts. 3. Siser Gupta, Kashmir: A Study in India-Pakistan Relations (New Delhi: Asia Publishing House, 1966), pp. 440. 4. Stephen P. Cohen, 'The Strategic Imagery of Elites, in James M. Roherty (ed.), Defence Policy Formation : Towards Comparativ e Analysis (Durham, N.C: Caroline Academic Press, 1980), pp. 153-73. 5. Sumit Ganguly, The Origins ofWar in South Asia: Indo-Pakistan Conflicts since 1947 (Boulder: Westview, 1988), pp. 11-14 . 6. S. D. Muni, 'India and Regionalism in South Asia: A Political Perspective ', in Bimal Prasad (ed.), India's Foreign Policy: Studies in Continuity and Change (New Delhi: Vikas, 1979), pp. 115-16. 7. Douglas C. Makeig, 'War, No-war and the Indo-Pakistan Negotiating Pro­ cess', Pacific Affairs (60, 2, Summer 1987), pp. 271-294. 8. Cited from Surjit Mansingh, India's Search for Power: Indira Gandhi's Foreign Policy 1966-82 (New Delhi: SAGE Publications, 1984), p. 240. 9. Pakistan Times, 3 February 1972. 10. For the text of the Sino-US joint communique, see ibid., 28 February 1972. 11. Ibid., 17 February 1972. Notes to Chapter 2 165 12. Sun, 20 February 1972. 13. For a comparison of the Simla Agreement with the Tashkant Declaration, see Z. A. Bhutto, 'The Simla Accord', Pakistan Horizon (XXV, 3, 1972), pp. 3-16; Mehrunnisa Ali, 'The Simla Accord and Tashkant Declaration' , ibid., pp. 53-74. 14. Shri Ram Sharma, Indian Foreign Policy: Annual Survey 1972 (New Delhi: Sterling Publishers, 1972), pp. 154-5. 15. Lok Sabha Debates, fifth series (XVII, 1,31 July 1972), col. 246. ,16. Mansingh, India' s Search for Power, p. 229. 17. National Assembly ofPakistan Debates (2, 5,14 July 1972), p. 712. 18. See the joint statement issued by the Chiefs of Army Staff of Pakistan and India on 20 December 1972. For the text: Pakistan Horizon (XXVI, I, 1973), p.109. 19. Pakistan Times, 21 September 1972. 20. Ibid., II October 1972. 21. Foreign Affairs Record (XVIII, 7, July 1972), p. 195. 22. Pakistan Times, 3 August 1972. 23. Ibid., 11, 12 and 13 August 1972. 24. See the statement of Aziz Ahmad, Secretary General, Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, on the delienation of the Line of Control in Kashmir: Dawn, 12 December 1972. 25. Lok Sabha Debates, fifth series (XI, 5,17 March 1972), Col. 61. 26. Ibid., (XIV, 35, 2 May 1972), Col. 360. Sec also, Pakistan Horizon (XXV, 4, 1972), p. 85 27. Two categories of detainees were also released: the civilians who were interned for being on a visit to the other side when war broke out were exchanged in September 1972. Those detained prior to the outbreak of war were released in 1974. 28. News briefing by India's Foreign Secretary: Pakistan Times, 29 December 1971. 29. Pakistan Times, 30 December 1971. 30. Bangladesh also established courts for the trials of civilians living in Bangla­ desh on charges of collaboration with the Pakistani military, in 1971. Many people, including the last Bengali Governor of East Pakistan, Dr A. M. Malik, were sentenced to imprisonment, ranging from a few years to life. 31. Compiled from newspaper reports. The Indian authorities claimed that two of them died due to the injuries sustained by them in a clash between two groups of paws. Pakistan disputed this explanation. 32. The statement of the official spokesman of the government of Pakistan: Dawn, 22 April 1973. 33. India accused Pakistan's military and civilian officials of committing brutali­ ties against the people of Bangladesh, and claimed that the Pakistanis 'sys­ tematically liquidated professionals and intellectuals'. It also defended the right of Bangladesh to put such officials on trial. Sec the letter of India's Permanent Representative to the UN Secretary General: Foreign Affairs Record (XVIII, 1, January 1972), pp. 7-9; see also the statement of the Indian delegate to the meeting of the UN Human Rights Commission: ibid., (XVIII, 4, April 1972), pp. 109-10. 34. Dawn, 26 March 1972; Pakistan Times, 26 March 1973; see the letter of 166 Notes to Chapter 2 Pakistan's Permanent Representative to the UN Security Council: Dawn 9 April 1972. 35. Pakistan Times, 15 September 1972. 36. Asian Recorder, 4-10 June 1973, pp. 11420-21. 37. For the text of the Pakistani response to the Indo-Bangladesh Declaration, see: Pakistan Times, 21 April 1973; Pakistan Horizon (XXVI, 2, 1973), pp. 114-15. 38. Aziz Ahmad, Pakistan's Minister of State for Defence and Foreign Affairs, and P. N. Haksar, Indian Prime Minister's Special Emissary, led their delega­ tions. 39. Asian Recorder, 7-13 May 1974, p. 11986. This amount included administra­ tion expenses as well as pay and allowances of the paws. The pay and allowances ranged from Rs14 to Rs139 per month. Pakistan Times, 9 Decem­ ber 1972; see also ibid., 5 August 1972. 40. See the section on the recognition of Bangladesh. 41. The criterion for the repatriation of Biharis was stated in the Tripartite Agreement, 1974. 42. Far Eastern Economic Review, 26 January 1989, p. 28; see also the statement of Pakistan's Finance Minister: Dawn Overseas Weekly, 14-20 July 1988. 43. India was the first country to extend recognition to Bangladesh on 6 Decem­ ber 1971, 10 days before the Pakistani troops surrendered there.
Recommended publications
  • Political Development, the People's Party of Pakistan and the Elections of 1970

    Political Development, the People's Party of Pakistan and the Elections of 1970

    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 1973 Political development, the People's Party of Pakistan and the elections of 1970. Meenakshi Gopinath University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Gopinath, Meenakshi, "Political development, the People's Party of Pakistan and the elections of 1970." (1973). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 2461. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/2461 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FIVE COLLEGE DEPOSITORY POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT, THE PEOPLE'S PARTY OF PAKISTAN AND THE ELECTIONS OF 1970 A Thesis Presented By Meenakshi Gopinath Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS June 1973 Political Science POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT, THE PEOPLE'S PARTY OF PAKISTAN AND THE ELECTIONS OF 1970 A Thesis Presented By Meenakshi Gopinath Approved as to style and content hy: Prof. Anwar Syed (Chairman of Committee) f. Glen Gordon (Head of Department) Prof. Fred A. Kramer (Member) June 1973 ACKNOWLEDGMENT My deepest gratitude is extended to my adviser, Professor Anwar Syed, who initiated in me an interest in Pakistani poli- tics. Working with such a dedicated educator and academician was, for me, a totally enriching experience. I wish to ex- press my sincere appreciation for his invaluable suggestions, understanding and encouragement and for synthesizing so beautifully the roles of Friend, Philosopher and Guide.
  • Pakistan's Atomic Bomb and the Search for Security

    Pakistan's Atomic Bomb and the Search for Security

    Pakistan's Atomic Bomb And The Search For Security edited by Zia Mian Gautam Publishers 27 Temple Road, Lahore, Pakistan Printed by Maktaba Jadeed Press, Lahore, Pakistan ©1995 by Zia Mian A publication of the Campaign for Nuclear Sanity and the Sustainable Development Policy Institute Acknowledgements No book is ever produced in isolation. This one in particular is the work of many hands, and minds. Among the people whose contribution has been indispensable, special mention must be made of Nauman Naqvi from SDPI. There is Gautam Publishers, who have taken the risk when others have not. The greatest debts are, as always, personal. They are rarely mentioned, can never be paid, and payment is never asked for. It is enough that they are remembered. Contents Foreword Dr. Mubashir Hasan i Introduction Dr. Zia Mian 1 1. Nuclear Myths And Realities Dr. Pervez Hoodbhoy 3 Bombs for Prestige? 4 Understanding May 1990 8 The Overt-Covert Debate 11 Nuclear War - By Accident 16 The Second Best Option 17 Options for Pakistan 21 2. A False Sense Of Security Lt.-Gen. (rtd.) Mujib ur Rehman Khan 24 A Matter of Perception 25 Useless Nukes 26 A Sterile Pursuit 28 3. The Costs Of Nuclear Security Dr. Zia Mian 30 The Human Costs of Nuclear Programmes 31 Nuclear Accidents 35 Nuclear Guardians 38 Buying Security with Nuclear Weapons 40 The Real Cost of Nuclear Weapons 44 Safety 48 The Social Costs of Nuclear Security 51 Who Benefits? 53 The Ultimate Costs of Nuclear Security 56 4. The Nuclear Arms Race And Fall Of The Soviet Union Dr.
  • Pakistan's Nuclear Proliferation Activities and The

    Pakistan's Nuclear Proliferation Activities and The

    Order Code RL32745 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Pakistan’s Nuclear Proliferation Activities and the Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission: U.S. Policy Constraints and Options Updated March 16, 2005 Richard P. Cronin, Coordinator Specialist in Asian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division K. Alan Kronstadt Analyst in Asian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Sharon Squassoni Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Pakistan’s Nuclear Proliferation Activities and the Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission: U.S. Policy Constraints and Options Summary In calling for a clear, strong, and long-term commitment to support the military- dominated government of Pakistan despite serious concerns about that country’s nuclear proliferation activities, The Final Report of the 9/11 Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States cast into sharp relief two long-standing contradictions in U.S. policy towards Pakistan and South Asia. First, in over fifty years, the United States and Pakistan have never been able to align their national security objectives except partially and temporarily. Pakistan’s central goal has been to gain U.S. support to bolster its security against India, whereas the United States has tended to view the relationship from the perspective of its global security interests. Second, U.S. nuclear nonproliferation objectives towards Pakistan (and India) repeatedly have been subordinated to other U.S. goals. During the 1980s, Pakistan successfully exploited its importance as a conduit for aid to the anti-Soviet Afghan mujahidin to deter the application of U.S.
  • The American Papers Secret and Confidential India-Pakistan-Bangladesh Documents 1965-1973

    The American Papers Secret and Confidential India-Pakistan-Bangladesh Documents 1965-1973

    THE AMERICAN PAPERS SECRET AND CONFIDENTIAL INDIA-PAKISTAN-BANGLADESH DOCUMENTS 1965-1973 COMPILED AND SELECTED BY ROEDADKHAN INTRODUCTION BY JAMSHEED MARKER OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Contents Preface xxiii Acknowledgements xxv Introduction xxvii 1965 1. Highlights of Foreign Minister Bhutto's Conversation with McConaughy on Rann of Kutch. 30 April 1965. 3 2. Indo-Pakistan Conflict: Information Memorandum. 30 April 1965. 6 3. Pakistan's Response to Wilson's Request for an Immediate Ceasefire: Correction. 30 April 1965. 8 4. Provocative Indian Overflight: Asghar Khan's Information. 15 May 1965. 9 5. Meeting with Ambassador Bowles: Briefing Memorandum. 2 June 1965. 11 (i) Summary of Bowles Memorandum on United State's Policy in South East Asia. 1 June 1965. 12 (ii) US Ambassador Chester Bowles Letter to the US Under Secretary of State, George W Ball. 21 May 1965. 14 6. Ambassador Bowles Telegram from American Embassy in New Delhi: Indian Military and Political Objectives Unclear. 6 September 1965. 15 7. McConaughy's Meeting with President Ayub and Foreign Minister Bhutto. 6 September 1965. [5 Documents Partial Accounts] 17 8. Telegram from American Embassy in Karachi on how USG should respond to GOP's request for Action. 6 September 1965. 19 9. MAAG Chief Contacts General Musa. 6 September 1965. 21 10. Kashmir: Comment on GOP's Mood. 7 September 1965. 32 11. McConaughy's Meeting with Ayub. 7 September 1965. 35 12. Message from Shoaib. 7 September 1965. 37 13. GOP's Request for Help: Shah's Briefing. 8 September 1965. 38 14. Memorandum of Conversation: Indo-Pakistan Dispute. 8 September 1965.
  • Israel-Pakistan Relations Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies (JCSS)

    Israel-Pakistan Relations Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies (JCSS)

    P. R. Kumaraswamy Beyond the Veil: Israel-Pakistan Relations Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies (JCSS) The purpose of the Jaffee Center is, first, to conduct basic research that meets the highest academic standards on matters related to Israel's national security as well as Middle East regional and international secu- rity affairs. The Center also aims to contribute to the public debate and governmental deliberation of issues that are - or should be - at the top of Israel's national security agenda. The Jaffee Center seeks to address the strategic community in Israel and abroad, Israeli policymakers and opinion-makers and the general public. The Center relates to the concept of strategy in its broadest meaning, namely the complex of processes involved in the identification, mobili- zation and application of resources in peace and war, in order to solidify and strengthen national and international security. To Jasjit Singh with affection and gratitude P. R. Kumaraswamy Beyond the Veil: Israel-Pakistan Relations Memorandum no. 55, March 2000 Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies 6 P. R. Kumaraswamy Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies Tel Aviv University Ramat Aviv, 69978 Tel Aviv, Israel Tel. 972 3 640-9926 Fax 972 3 642-2404 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.tau.ac.il/jcss/ ISBN: 965-459-041-7 © 2000 All rights reserved Graphic Design: Michal Semo Printed by: Kedem Ltd., Tel Aviv Beyond the Veil: Israel-Pakistan Relations 7 Contents Introduction .......................................................................................9
  • PRINT CULTURE and LEFT-WING RADICALISM in LAHORE, PAKISTAN, C.1947-1971

    PRINT CULTURE and LEFT-WING RADICALISM in LAHORE, PAKISTAN, C.1947-1971

    PRINT CULTURE AND LEFT-WING RADICALISM IN LAHORE, PAKISTAN, c.1947-1971 Irfan Waheed Usmani (M.Phil, History, University of Punjab, Lahore) A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY SOUTH ASIAN STUDIES PROGRAMME NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2016 DECLARATION I hereby declare that this thesis is my original work and it has been written by me in its entirety. I have duly acknowledged all the sources of information which have been used in the thesis. This thesis has also not been submitted for any degree in any university previously. _________________________________ Irfan Waheed Usmani 21 August 2015 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT First I would like to thank God Almighty for enabling me to pursue my higher education and enabling me to finish this project. At the very outset I would like to express deepest gratitude and thanks to my supervisor, Dr. Gyanesh Kudaisya, who provided constant support and guidance to this doctoral project. His depth of knowledge on history and related concepts guided me in appropriate direction. His interventions were both timely and meaningful, contributing towards my own understanding of interrelated issues and the subject on one hand, and on the other hand, injecting my doctoral journey with immense vigour and spirit. Without his valuable guidance, support, understanding approach, wisdom and encouragement this thesis would not have been possible. His role as a guide has brought real improvements in my approach as researcher and I cannot measure his contributions in words. I must acknowledge that I owe all the responsibility of gaps and mistakes in my work. I am thankful to his wife Prof.
  • 3 Who Is Who and What Is What

    3 Who Is Who and What Is What

    3 e who is who and what is what Ever Success - General Knowledge 4 Saad Book Bank, Lahore Ever Success Revised and Updated GENERAL KNOWLEDGE Who is who? What is what? CSS, PCS, PMS, FPSC, ISSB Police, Banks, Wapda, Entry Tests and for all Competitive Exames and Interviews World Pakistan Science English Computer Geography Islamic Studies Subjectives + Objectives etc. Abbreviations Current Affair Sports + Games Ever Success - General Knowledge 5 Saad Book Bank, Lahore © ALL RIGHTS RESERVED No part of this book may be reproduced In any form, by photostate, electronic or mechanical, or any other means without the written permission of author and publisher. Composed By Muhammad Tahsin Ever Success - General Knowledge 6 Saad Book Bank, Lahore Dedicated To ME Ever Success - General Knowledge 7 Saad Book Bank, Lahore Ever Success - General Knowledge 8 Saad Book Bank, Lahore P R E F A C E I offer my services for designing this strategy of success. The material is evidence of my claim, which I had collected from various resources. I have written this book with an aim in my mind. I am sure this book will prove to be an invaluable asset for learners. I have tried my best to include all those topics which are important for all competitive exams and interviews. No book can be claimed as prefect except Holy Quran. So if you found any shortcoming or mistake, you should inform me, according to your suggestions, improvements will be made in next edition. The author would like to thank all readers and who gave me their valuable suggestions for the completion of this book.
  • Pakistan's Historical Links with the Middle East in the 1970S

    Pakistan's Historical Links with the Middle East in the 1970S

    Syracuse University SURFACE Theses - ALL May 2019 From the Indian Ocean to the Persian: Pakistan's Historical Links with the Middle East in the 1970s Mohammad Ebad Athar Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/thesis Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Athar, Mohammad Ebad, "From the Indian Ocean to the Persian: Pakistan's Historical Links with the Middle East in the 1970s" (2019). Theses - ALL. 298. https://surface.syr.edu/thesis/298 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses - ALL by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT “From the Indian Ocean to the Persian Gulf” assesses Pakistan’s connections to two of the Persian Gulf’s principal actors, Iran and Saudi Arabia from 1971 to 1977. In the aftermath of the 1971 Indo-Pak War, Islamabad began orienting its foreign policy toward the Gulf politically, economically, militarily, and religiously. These relationships in the 1970s established the foundation for Pakistan’s relations with the Gulf in the 1980s and subsequent decades. Utilizing Pakistani news media, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto’s speeches and statements, memoirs from Pakistani diplomats, and American archival material, I argue that understanding the ways in which Pakistan, Iran, and Saudi Arabia interacted with each other in this period helps to explain the cooperation seen during the Soviet war in Afghanistan and the Iran-Iraq War of the 1980s. Furthermore, this project sheds light on the importance of regional constructions to foreign policy interests.
  • The Battle for Pakistan

    The Battle for Pakistan

    ebooksall.com ebooksall.com ebooksall.com SHUJA NAWAZ THE BATTLE F OR PAKISTAN The Bitter US Friendship and a Tough Neighbourhood PENGUIN BOOKS ebooksall.com Contents Important Milestones 2007–19 Abbreviations and Acronyms Preface: Salvaging a Misalliance 1. The Revenge of Democracy? 2. Friends or Frenemies? 3. 2011: A Most Horrible Year! 4. From Tora Bora to Pathan Gali 5. Internal Battles 6. Salala: Anatomy of a Failed Alliance 7. Mismanaging the Civil–Military Relationship 8. US Aid: Leverage or a Trap? 9. Mil-to-Mil Relations: Do More 10. Standing in the Right Corner 11. Transforming the Pakistan Army 12. Pakistan’s Military Dilemma 13. Choices Footnotes Important Milestones 2007–19 Preface: Salvaging a Misalliance 1. The Revenge of Democracy? 2. Friends or Frenemies? 3. 2011: A Most Horrible Year! 4. From Tora Bora to Pathan Gali 5. Internal Battles 6. Salala: Anatomy of a Failed Alliance 7. Mismanaging the Civil–Military Relationship 8. US Aid: Leverage or a Trap? 9. Mil-to-Mil Relations: Do More 10. Standing in the Right Corner 11. Transforming the Pakistan Army 12. Pakistan’s Military Dilemma 13. Choices Select Bibliography ebooksall.com Acknowledgements Follow Penguin Copyright ebooksall.com Advance Praise for the Book ‘An intriguing, comprehensive and compassionate analysis of the dysfunctional relationship between the United States and Pakistan by the premier expert on the Pakistan Army. Shuja Nawaz exposes the misconceptions and contradictions on both sides of one of the most crucial bilateral relations in the world’ —BRUCE RIEDEL, senior fellow and director of the Brookings Intelligence Project, and author of Deadly Embrace: Pakistan, America and the Future of the Global Jihad ‘A superb, thoroughly researched account of the complex dynamics that have defined the internal and external realities of Pakistan over the past dozen years.
  • Stability in Pakistan: Realizing the Vision of Enlightened Moderation

    Stability in Pakistan: Realizing the Vision of Enlightened Moderation

    NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS STABILITY IN PAKISTAN: REALIZING THE VISION OF ENLIGHTENED MODERATION by Tanya M. Murnock June 2006 Thesis Advisor: Feroz H. Khan Second Reader: Thomas H. Johnson Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2006 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Stability in Pakistan: Realizing the Vision of Enlightened Moderation 6. AUTHOR(S) Capt. Tanya M. Murnock, USMC 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
  • LJMU Research Online

    LJMU Research Online

    LJMU Research Online Craig, MM ‘Nuclear Sword of the Moslem World’?: the United States, Britain, Pakistan, and the ‘Islamic Bomb’, 1977–80 http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/4612/ Article Citation (please note it is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from this work) Craig, MM (2016) ‘Nuclear Sword of the Moslem World’?: the United States, Britain, Pakistan, and the ‘Islamic Bomb’, 1977–80. International History Review, 38 (5). pp. 857-879. ISSN 0707-5332 LJMU has developed LJMU Research Online for users to access the research output of the University more effectively. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LJMU Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of the record. Please see the repository URL above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription. For more information please contact [email protected] http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/ ‘Nuclear Sword of the Moslem World’?: America, Britain, Pakistan, and the ‘Islamic bomb’, 1977-1980 Malcolm M. Craig Email: [email protected] This article appeared in The International History Review, Vol.38, No.5 (2016) http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07075332.2016.1140670 1 Introduction In advance of Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s March 2015 address to the US Congress, an editorial in the conservative Washington Times commented: Mr Netanyahu has the opportunity to talk in plain speech with no equivocation about the threat that Iran, armed with the Islamic bomb, poses to the survival of the Jewish state and perhaps the United States as well.
  • Pakistan: Chronology of Recent Events

    Pakistan: Chronology of Recent Events

    Order Code RS21584 Updated February 5, 2004 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Pakistan: Chronology of Recent Events K. Alan Kronstadt Analyst in Asian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Summary This report provides a reverse chronology of recent events involving Pakistan and Pakistan-U.S. relations.1 For a substantive review, see CRS Issue Brief IB94041, Pakistan-U.S. Relations. This report will be updated monthly. 02/05/04 — President Musharraf granted a full pardon to Abdul Qadeer Khan, the Acronyms founder of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons LOC: Line of Control program and national hero, for all (Kashmir) activities related to his sharing of MMA: Muttahida Majlis-e- nuclear technology with other Amal, a coalition of six Islamist political parties countries. Musharraf cited Khan’s NWFP: North West Frontier contributions to the nation as grounds Province for the pardon, which had been SAARC: South Asian recommended by his cabinet, and he Association for identified “money” as the motivator Regional Cooperation for the illicit activities of Pakistani scientists. Musharraf also said that he will not hand over any relevant documents to International Atomic Energy Agency investigators, nor allow them to inspect Pakistan’s nuclear sites. The United States responded by saying that the decision to pardon is an internal Pakistani matter, and expressed a belief that Pakistan “is taking serious efforts to end the activities of a dangerous [proliferation] network.” The United States also “expects that Pakistan will share information that they’re unearthing ... with the international community.” On the same day, Director of Central Intelligence Tenet said that the U.S.