The American Papers Secret and Confidential India-Pakistan-Bangladesh Documents 1965-1973

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The American Papers Secret and Confidential India-Pakistan-Bangladesh Documents 1965-1973 THE AMERICAN PAPERS SECRET AND CONFIDENTIAL INDIA-PAKISTAN-BANGLADESH DOCUMENTS 1965-1973 COMPILED AND SELECTED BY ROEDADKHAN INTRODUCTION BY JAMSHEED MARKER OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Contents Preface xxiii Acknowledgements xxv Introduction xxvii 1965 1. Highlights of Foreign Minister Bhutto's Conversation with McConaughy on Rann of Kutch. 30 April 1965. 3 2. Indo-Pakistan Conflict: Information Memorandum. 30 April 1965. 6 3. Pakistan's Response to Wilson's Request for an Immediate Ceasefire: Correction. 30 April 1965. 8 4. Provocative Indian Overflight: Asghar Khan's Information. 15 May 1965. 9 5. Meeting with Ambassador Bowles: Briefing Memorandum. 2 June 1965. 11 (i) Summary of Bowles Memorandum on United State's Policy in South East Asia. 1 June 1965. 12 (ii) US Ambassador Chester Bowles Letter to the US Under Secretary of State, George W Ball. 21 May 1965. 14 6. Ambassador Bowles Telegram from American Embassy in New Delhi: Indian Military and Political Objectives Unclear. 6 September 1965. 15 7. McConaughy's Meeting with President Ayub and Foreign Minister Bhutto. 6 September 1965. [5 Documents Partial Accounts] 17 8. Telegram from American Embassy in Karachi on how USG should respond to GOP's request for Action. 6 September 1965. 19 9. MAAG Chief Contacts General Musa. 6 September 1965. 21 10. Kashmir: Comment on GOP's Mood. 7 September 1965. 32 11. McConaughy's Meeting with Ayub. 7 September 1965. 35 12. Message from Shoaib. 7 September 1965. 37 13. GOP's Request for Help: Shah's Briefing. 8 September 1965. 38 14. Memorandum of Conversation: Indo-Pakistan Dispute. 8 September 1965. 40 Vlli CONTENTS 15. Indo-Pakistan Conflict: Partial Accounts of UK and Canadian High Commissioners talks with Ayub and Bhutto. 8 September 1965. 43 16. McConaughy's Meeting with Bhutto on GOP's Request. 9 September 1965. [2 Documents]. 45 17. GOP Proposal for Settlement of Indo-Pak Conflict. 9 September 1965. 48 18. Dean Rusk's Memorandum for the US President: India-Pakistan. 9 September 1965. 53 19. Suspension of Military Aid and Shipments to Pakistan and India: Bhutto Informed. 10 September 1965. [2 Documents Partial Accounts]. 55 20. Suspension of Military Aid: Full Account of McConaughy's Meeting with Bhutto. [3 Documents]. 10 September 1965. 58 21. Situation in Karachi. 10 September 1965. 68 22. Afghan Support for Pakistan. 11 September 1965. 69 23. GOP Proposal for Settlement of Indo-Pak conflict. 11 September 1965. 70 24. Private Meeting with Shoaib: Indo-Pak Crisis. 19 September 1965. 73 25. Reflections from Dacca on Indo-Pakistan Hostilities. 23 September 1965. 74 26. Ceasefire: Public Attitudes. 26 September 1965. 76 27. Altaf Gauhar on the Third Option in Kashmir Dispute. 7 October 1965. - 77 28. (i) Confidential Memo from American Friends Service Committee. 1 November 1965. 78 1966 1. Indo-Pak Views on the Tashkent Meeting. 1 January 1966. 93 2. Pakistan's Foreign Secretary, Agha Shahi's Analysis of the Tashkent Agreement. 6 January 1966. 96 3. Finance Minister Shoaib's Analysis of the Current Political Atmosphere. 8 January 1966. 98 4. Law Minister and Acting Foreign Minister's Views on Tashkent Agreement. 12 January 1966. 100 5. Foreign Minister's Report on Tashkent Conference. 13 January 1966. [2 Documents]. 103 6. Tashkent Aftermath. 13 January 1966. 108 7. The US Vice-President and Secretary of State's Meeting with the Indian Prime Minister, Nanda. 13 January 1966. 109 8. The Vice President and Secretary of States' Meeting with L.K. Jha. 13 January 1966. Ill CONTENTS IX 9. Ayub Report to Cabinet Members on Tashkent Talks: Shoaib's Account. 13 January 1966. 113 10. Tashkent Reaction. 15 January 1966. 115 11. Outgoing Telegram on Ayub's US Visit. 17 January 1966. 117 12. Dacca rumours: Serious Political Trouble in West Pakistan. 17 January 1966. 118 13. Bhutto on Tashkent. 17 January 1966. 119 14. Military Displeased with Tashkent. 18 January 1966. 120 15. Tashkent Reaction: PAF. 18 January 1966. 121 16. McConaughy's Meeting with the Opposition Leader Nurul Amin. 18 January 1966. 123 17. Indo-Pakistan Relations: British Messages. 20 January 1966. 125 18. Tashkent: Karachi Press Indications. 20 January 1966. 126 19. Press Report: Correction. 21 January 1966. 128 20. India and Pakistan: Next Step in US Policy. 1 February 1966. 129 (i) Scenario for Pakistan 130 (ii) Scenario for India 134 21. Sidelights on Tashkent Meeting. 1 February 1966. 139 22. Rumours about Cabinet Reshuffle: Ayub's Denial. 5 February 1966. 143 23. Text of Ayub's Letter to the US President. 5 February 1966. 144 24. Tashkent Reaction: GOP officials report to US Ambassador & other Embassy officials. 7 February 1966. 146 25. Information Secretary Altaf Gauhar's Review on Tashkent reactions and Resumption of US Bombing in Vietnam. 7 February 1966. [2 Documents]. 149 26. Finance Minister Shoaib's Reports on Pak Tashkent Reaction and Bhutto's Position. 7 February 1966. 153 27. Anti-Indian Propaganda. 31 May 1966. 155 28. Governor Kalabagh on Pak-Indian Relations and Kashmir. 17 June 1966. 157 29. David Linebaugh's Letter to Gordon Schull: Memorandum on Kashmir. 29 July 1966. 158 (i) Implications of a Unilateral Indian Settlement of The Kashmir Issue, with Concessions to Pakistan Outside the Vale: A Exploratory Memorandum. 159 30. Indo-Pakistan Relations: Memorandum of Conversation. 19 August 1966. 163 (i) Note to High Commissioner of India in Islamabad. 168 (ii) Indian High Commissioner's Note to Pakistan Foreign Secretary, Yusuf. 169 (iii) Detail of Pakistan Army build up in Pakistan. 170 (iv) Build up of Pakistan Army, Air Force and Navy 171 (v) Major Military Hardware by Pakistan. 173 X CONTENTS 31. Jammu and Kashmir: A Year After the September Conflict. 16 September 1966. 174 32. Memorandum of Conversation with New Indian Ambassador Kewal Singh. 20 September 1966. 182 (i) Memorandum of Conversation. 13 September 1966. 183 (ii) New Indian Ambassador Arrives. 30 August 1966. 185 33. Attitudes of Pakistan Military Officers in the East Wing. 23 September 1966. 186 34. Indo-Pakistan Relations. Memorandum of Conversation. 30 September 1966. 188 (i) "Working Paper" on Indo-Pakistan talks. 190 35. Conversation with General Manekshaw. 15 October 1966. 192 (i) Memorandum of Conversation. 193 36. Bhutto Making Opening Bid? 25 November 1966. 196 37. Indo-Pak-US Political and Military Relations. 16 December 1966. 197 38. Foreign Minister Pirzada's Reference to Indian Hardline on Kashmir. 16 December 1966. 199 (i) K.C. Saxena's Book: Foreword. 23 March 1966. 201 39. Indo-Pak Relations: Ambassador Locke's Meeting with Foreign Secretary S.M. Yusuf. 17 December 1966. 202 40. Indo-Pak Relations: Belonia Firing. 17 December 1966. 205 41. Indo-Pak Relations: Memorandum of Conversation. 23 December 1966. 206 (i) Implementation of Tashkent Declaration. 207 1967 1. Meeting with Information Secretary, Altaf Gauhar. 11 January 1967. 213 2: Bhutto's Present Outlook. Memorandum of Conversation. 26 April 1967. 214 3. Letter from Norman B. Hannah to Secretary of State Dean Rusk. 3 May 1967. 218 (i) Memorandum for Mr. Walt W. Rostow: Letter to the President from Ambassador Eugene A. Locke. 9 May 1967. 219 (ii) Letter to the US President from Ambassador Eugene A Locke. 1 May 1967. 220 4. Extraordinary Personnel Action Request. 19 May 1967. 228 5. Memorandum of Conversation between Makhdumzada Syed Hasan Mahmud Shah and American Consul-in-Charge, Craig Baxter. 31 July 1967. 229 CONTENTS Xi 6. Memorandum of Conversation between Syed Hadi Shah Bokhari, former Mayor of Lahore and Craig Baxter. 4 August 1967. 231 7. EBDONIANS: Views of Hasan Mahmud and Hadi Ali Shah of Qazilbash Camp. 11 August 1967. 233 8. Bhutto Visits East Pakistan — A Political Foray. 7 November 1967. 235 9. East Pakistan: Dacca Author Requests US Support for Bengali Coup Plot. 28 November 1967. 239 10. Abortive Coup — Assassination Plot: Dacca. 28 December 1967. 243 1968 1. Arrests of Three Prominent Bengali Officers. 6 January 1968. 247 2. An Exercise in Conspiracy: A Resume. 12 March 1968. 248 3. East Pakistan: Memorandum of Conversation on Sheikh Mujibur Rahman role in the Agartala Conspiracy. 10 July 1968. 250 4. President Johnson's Letter to President Ayub. 14 July 1968. 251 5. Trial of Alleged Conspirators in East Pakistan Tarnishing Government Image. 7 August 1968. 253 6. Mahmood Haroon to London? 27 September 1968. 254 7. Reactions to Bhutto's Arrest and Asghar Khan's entry into Politics. 25 November 1968. 257 8. Reactions in Karachi Consular District to Bhutto's Arrest. 29 November 1968. 259 1969 1. Pakistan: Martial Law 'Who's Who'. 26 March 1969. 265 2. Message from Chief Martial Law Administrator to President Nixon. 27 March 1969. 267 3. A.K. Brohi's Comments on Martial Law. 1 April 1969. 269 (i) Memorandum of Conversation. 31 March 1969. 270 4. Belief that Yusuf Haroon is US Agent. 28 May 1969. 272 5. UK Deputy High Commissioner's View of East Pakistan's Future. 9 June 1969. 274 6. Meeting with President Yahya. 10 June 1969. 276 7. Yahya's 'Documents'. 20 June 1969. 277 8. Amir Ahmed Khan a CIA Agent? 3 July 1969. 279 9. Memorandum of Conversation with Pir Pagara. 22 August 1969. 280 (i) Memorandum of Conversation. 20 August 1969. 281 10. Memorandum of Conversation with J.A. Rahim. 29 August 1969. 283 (i) Memorandum of Conversation. 27 August 1969. 284 Xil CONTENTS 11. The US Secretary's Conversation with Pakistan Minister of Information and National Affairs. 30 September 1969. 286 12. Abdul Ghaffar Khan's Comments. 24 October 1969. 290 13. Current Pakistani Scene—Comment. 7 November 1969. 293 14. Current Pakistani Scene—Constituent Post Assessments. 14 November 1969. 298 1970 1. Pakistan Muslim League—Second Coming? 6 January 1970.
Recommended publications
  • General Assembly Official Records Fifty-Fourth Session
    United Nations A/54/PV.84 General Assembly Official Records Fifty-fourth session 84th plenary meeting Friday, 17 December 1999, 3 p.m. New York President: Mr. Gurirab ...................................... (Namibia) In the absence of the President, Mr. Morel become sponsors: Argentina, Belarus, Bolivia, Brazil, (Seychelles), Vice-President, took the Chair. Colombia, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Guyana, Haiti, Madagascar, Mali, the Marshall Islands, Mauritius, The meeting was called to order at 3.15 p.m. Samoa, Seychelles, United Republic of Tanzania and Uruguay. Agenda items 20 and 50 (continued) May I take it that the Assembly decides to adopt draft resolution A/54/L.58? Strengthening of the coordination of humanitarian and disaster relief assistance of the United Nations, including Draft resolution A/54/L.58 was adopted (resolution special economic assistance 54/189). (f) Emergency international assistance for peace, The Acting President: May I take it that it is the normalcy and reconstruction of war-stricken wish of the General Assembly to conclude its Afghanistan consideration of sub-item (f) of agenda item 20? The situation in Afghanistan and its implications for It was so decided. international peace and security The Acting President: The Assembly has thus Draft resolution (A/54/L.58) concluded this stage of its consideration of agenda item 50. Report of the Fifth Committee (A/54/671) The Acting President: We will now proceed to take Agenda item 24 (continued) action on draft resolution A/54/L.58. Return or restitution of cultural property to the The report of the Fifth Committee on the programme countries of origin budget implications of the draft resolution is contained in document A/54/671.
    [Show full text]
  • Mrs. Maryam Faruqi
    HAPPY HOME SCHOOL SYSTEM MRS. MARYAM FARUQI Tribute to a Pioneer in Education Mrs. Maryam Faruqi is a well-known name in the educational circles of Pakistan. She is the founder of the Happy Home School System. FAMILY HISTORY: Her success can be attributed to her passion for education and the restless desire to utilize her potential for the service of humanity. She was born in India to Sir Ebrahim and Lady Hawabai Ebrahim Haroon Jaffer. Her father tried to create an educational awakening amongst the Muslims and laid the foundation of the Bombay Provincial Muslim Educational Conference which was affiliated to the All India Mohammedan Educational Conference of Aligarh. He also set up a school in Pune which is to date offering excellent education to Muslim girls. EARLY EDUCATION: Her education started from the Islamia School, Pune, which is now a full-fledged school named after her parents. When she topped in grade- 6, she was asked by the Headmistress to teach Urdu to class-V. She felt on top of the world when at the end of the period the Headmistress remarked, “I bet you will be a good Headmistress.” That was her first success. She gave her Matriculation Examination through the Convent of Jesus and Mary, Pune and acquired First Merit Position. Her name remains etched on the Honour Roll Board. She joined the prestigious Naurosji Wadia College and her outstanding intermediate results earned her the Moosa Qasim Gold Medal. In 1945, she graduated from Bombay University with distinction & was awarded a Gold Medal in B.A Honours.
    [Show full text]
  • Abbott Laboratories (Pak) Ltd. List of Non CNIC Shareholders Final Dividend for the Year Ended Dec 31, 2015 SNO WARRANT NO FOLIO NAME HOLDING ADDRESS 1 510004 95 MR
    Abbott Laboratories (Pak) Ltd. List of non CNIC shareholders Final Dividend For the year ended Dec 31, 2015 SNO WARRANT_NO FOLIO NAME HOLDING ADDRESS 1 510004 95 MR. AKHTER HUSAIN 14 C-182, BLOCK-C NORTH NAZIMABAD KARACHI 2 510007 126 MR. AZIZUL HASAN KHAN 181 FLAT NO. A-31 ALLIANCE PARADISE APARTMENT PHASE-I, II-C/1 NAGAN CHORANGI, NORTH KARACHI KARACHI. 3 510008 131 MR. ABDUL RAZAK HASSAN 53 KISMAT TRADERS THATTAI COMPOUND KARACHI-74000. 4 510009 164 MR. MOHD. RAFIQ 1269 C/O TAJ TRADING CO. O.T. 8/81, KAGZI BAZAR KARACHI. 5 510010 169 MISS NUZHAT 1610 469/2 AZIZABAD FEDERAL 'B' AREA KARACHI 6 510011 223 HUSSAINA YOUSUF ALI 112 NAZRA MANZIL FLAT NO 2 1ST FLOOR, RODRICK STREET SOLDIER BAZAR NO. 2 KARACHI 7 510012 244 MR. ABDUL RASHID 2 NADIM MANZIL LY 8/44 5TH FLOOR, ROOM 37 HAJI ESMAIL ROAD GALI NO 3, NAYABAD KARACHI 8 510015 270 MR. MOHD. SOHAIL 192 FOURTH FLOOR HAJI WALI MOHD BUILDING MACCHI MIANI MARKET ROAD KHARADHAR KARACHI 9 510017 290 MOHD. YOUSUF BARI 1269 KUTCHI GALI NO 1 MARRIOT ROAD KARACHI 10 510019 298 MR. ZAFAR ALAM SIDDIQUI 192 A/192 BLOCK-L NORTH NAZIMABAD KARACHI 11 510020 300 MR. RAHIM 1269 32 JAFRI MANZIL KUTCHI GALI NO 3 JODIA BAZAR KARACHI 12 510021 301 MRS. SURRIYA ZAHEER 1610 A-113 BLOCK NO 2 GULSHAD-E-IQBAL KARACHI 13 510022 320 CH. ABDUL HAQUE 583 C/O MOHD HANIF ABDUL AZIZ HOUSE NO. 265-G, BLOCK-6 EXT. P.E.C.H.S. KARACHI.
    [Show full text]
  • Ford, Kissinger, Pakistani Foreign Minister Aziz Ahmed
    File scanned from the National Security Adviser's Memoranda of Conversation Collection at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON SECRl&'I'/NODIS MEMORANDUM OF CONVERSATION PARTICIPANTS: Aziz Ahmed, Minister of State for Foreign Affairs and Defense, Pakistan Dr. Henry A. Kissinger, Secretary of State and Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs Lt. General Brent Scowcroft, Deputy Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs DATE AND TIME: Thursday, October 17, 1974 3:40 - 4:33 p. m. PLACE: The Secretary's Office The White House Ahmed: I have a couple of ideas about India. Kissinger: I don't have any great illusions about making progress with India. I am try ing to take away the image of tilting towards Pakistan. That is not helpful to you. Ahmed: One way to make her less dependent on the Soviet Union would be to point out they don't need all the weapons. Another would be better contacts with the PRC. We think the breakup of India is inevitable. India is basically ungovernable. It is too diverse, and we don't see the leadership--everything following Nehru family charisma. Were India to split into territories, As sam, Benga~, etcetera, it would be natural and more governable. It would then pay more attention to the demands of its people. It is the only way to get a durable peace in the area. Her economic needs rise from its economic difficulties. Your whiz kids should think this over. Kissinger: I can just see this in the newspapers. ,,//fORQ Ahmed: Think about it.
    [Show full text]
  • Prime Minister Bhutto (1)” of the National Security Adviser’S Presidential Correspondence with Foreign Leaders Collection at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 3, folder “Pakistan - Prime Minister Bhutto (1)” of the National Security Adviser’s Presidential Correspondence with Foreign Leaders Collection at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL ~ WASHINGTON, D.C. 20506 <SG-NWIDENTLA L. (GDS) VIA LDX March 10, 1975 MEMORANDUM FOR GEORGE SPRINGSTEEN Executive Secretary Department of State SUBJECT: Presidential Message of Reply to Pakistani Prime Minister Bhutto --SIS 7504012 (Letter from Bhutto) and LDX #69 of March 3 (Proposed Reply) Attached is the revised cleared text of the President 1 s reply (per LDX 69 of March 3) to the letter (S/S 7504012) from Pakistani Prime Minister Bhutto on the decision of the U.S. Government to lift the embargo against the sale of arms to Pakistan and India. State is authorized to transmit the President 1 s message of reply through appropriate channels. {; 0 NF IDEM !i' ifA.L -( G DS) NSC -ROakley ,.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle for Pakistan
    ebooksall.com ebooksall.com ebooksall.com SHUJA NAWAZ THE BATTLE F OR PAKISTAN The Bitter US Friendship and a Tough Neighbourhood PENGUIN BOOKS ebooksall.com Contents Important Milestones 2007–19 Abbreviations and Acronyms Preface: Salvaging a Misalliance 1. The Revenge of Democracy? 2. Friends or Frenemies? 3. 2011: A Most Horrible Year! 4. From Tora Bora to Pathan Gali 5. Internal Battles 6. Salala: Anatomy of a Failed Alliance 7. Mismanaging the Civil–Military Relationship 8. US Aid: Leverage or a Trap? 9. Mil-to-Mil Relations: Do More 10. Standing in the Right Corner 11. Transforming the Pakistan Army 12. Pakistan’s Military Dilemma 13. Choices Footnotes Important Milestones 2007–19 Preface: Salvaging a Misalliance 1. The Revenge of Democracy? 2. Friends or Frenemies? 3. 2011: A Most Horrible Year! 4. From Tora Bora to Pathan Gali 5. Internal Battles 6. Salala: Anatomy of a Failed Alliance 7. Mismanaging the Civil–Military Relationship 8. US Aid: Leverage or a Trap? 9. Mil-to-Mil Relations: Do More 10. Standing in the Right Corner 11. Transforming the Pakistan Army 12. Pakistan’s Military Dilemma 13. Choices Select Bibliography ebooksall.com Acknowledgements Follow Penguin Copyright ebooksall.com Advance Praise for the Book ‘An intriguing, comprehensive and compassionate analysis of the dysfunctional relationship between the United States and Pakistan by the premier expert on the Pakistan Army. Shuja Nawaz exposes the misconceptions and contradictions on both sides of one of the most crucial bilateral relations in the world’ —BRUCE RIEDEL, senior fellow and director of the Brookings Intelligence Project, and author of Deadly Embrace: Pakistan, America and the Future of the Global Jihad ‘A superb, thoroughly researched account of the complex dynamics that have defined the internal and external realities of Pakistan over the past dozen years.
    [Show full text]
  • THE DECLINE of the MUSLIM L,EAGUE and the ASCENDANCY of the BUREAUCRACY in EAST PAKISTAN 1947-54
    THE DECLINE OF THE MUSLIM l,EAGUE AND THE ASCENDANCY OF THE BUREAUCRACY IN EAST PAKISTAN 1947-54 A H AITh1ED KAMAL JANUARY 1989 A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY OF THE AUSTRALL.\N NATIONAL UNIVERSITY 205 CHAPTER 7 POLICE, PEOPLE, AND PROTEST I The Muslim League's incapacity to control the police force and its eventual dependence on them as the mainstay of state power introduced tensions into the League itself; in addition, it directly contributed to certain developments in the realm of politics. I also intend to highlight in this chapter instances where the police could not be controlled by civil bureaucrats and magistrates. Much of the erosion of the legitimacy of the Muslim League rule in East Pakistan was caused by the brutality, unlicensed tyranny, and corruption of the police. The press and the members of the Opposition in the East Bengal Legislative Assembly on many occasions exposed police atrocities on the population in a language that quite often verged on sentimentality. The Muslim League leadership in government explained police atrocities in terms of inexperience and indiscipline of the force. But people refused to see the regime as something different in intent and purpose from the police actions . Indeed, people's interpretation of 'political independence' did not fit well with what the ' police called 'law and order', and as a result a number of serious clashes occured. Police power was liberally employed to sustain the Muslim League rule; as a result 'police excesses' occurred at a regular rate. In a propaganda tract on the six years of Muslim League rule in East Pakistan that the United Front circulated at the time of the March 1954 election , cases of police atrocities featured prominently and the League was called a 'Murderer' .1 It was, in fact, the Front's pledge to limit police power that inspired the people to vote for the United Front in the first general election in the province.
    [Show full text]
  • LJMU Research Online
    LJMU Research Online Craig, MM ‘Nuclear Sword of the Moslem World’?: the United States, Britain, Pakistan, and the ‘Islamic Bomb’, 1977–80 http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/4612/ Article Citation (please note it is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from this work) Craig, MM (2016) ‘Nuclear Sword of the Moslem World’?: the United States, Britain, Pakistan, and the ‘Islamic Bomb’, 1977–80. International History Review, 38 (5). pp. 857-879. ISSN 0707-5332 LJMU has developed LJMU Research Online for users to access the research output of the University more effectively. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LJMU Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of the record. Please see the repository URL above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription. For more information please contact [email protected] http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/ ‘Nuclear Sword of the Moslem World’?: America, Britain, Pakistan, and the ‘Islamic bomb’, 1977-1980 Malcolm M. Craig Email: [email protected] This article appeared in The International History Review, Vol.38, No.5 (2016) http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07075332.2016.1140670 1 Introduction In advance of Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s March 2015 address to the US Congress, an editorial in the conservative Washington Times commented: Mr Netanyahu has the opportunity to talk in plain speech with no equivocation about the threat that Iran, armed with the Islamic bomb, poses to the survival of the Jewish state and perhaps the United States as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Volumes IX, X, XI
    UN Secretariat Item Scan - Barcode - Record Title Page 25 Date 08/06/2006 Time 11:11:49 AM S-0864-0004-04-00001 Expanded Number S-0864-0004-04-00001 Title items-in-Public relations files - luncheons, dinners and receptions - Volumes IX, X, XI Date Created 15/05/1967 Record Type Archival Item Container S-0864-0004: Public Relations Files of the Secretary-General: U Thant Print Name of Person Submit Image Signature of Person Submit E*i ? g' H o & S O> -J O He] 1 | \jg 03 ^N o P H) 0- H a (Hxrtomfora NEW YORK,N.Y. IOO25 SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS OFFICE OF THE OEAN September 1, 1967 .« W«T ,,3~ STn«T The Honorable U Thant Secretary General of the United Nations New York, N. Y. Dear U Thant: I want to thank you for inviting me to your very delightful luncheon on Wednesday. I appreciate it very much indeed. The conversation around the table was most interesting. I valued your own analysis of various topics and in particular Vietnam. You always have my very best wishes and warm support in your very responsible task. Cordial ly, Andrew W. Cordier Dean AWC/c Luncheon given by the Secretary-General Wednesday, 50 August 1967, 1.1$ p.m., 58th floor Mr. Yost Dr. Bunche Mr. EicheXberger :t Mr. Cousins Mr. Benjamin The Secretary-General Mr. Johnson Dr. Cordier Mr. Rolz-Bennett SG luncheon on Wednesday, 30 August 1967, 1.15 p.m., 38th floor / Mr. Worman Cousins ,/ Dr. Andrew Cordier ,/ Mr. Charles Yost ^ Mr. Bob Benjamin ^/ Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Aziz Ahmed, Minister of State for Foreign Affairs and Defense, Pakistan Amb
    DECLASSIFIED A/ISS/IPS, Department of State E.O. 12958, as amended October 11, 2007 MEMORANDUM OF CONVERSATION -PARTICIPANTS: Aziz Ahmed, Minister of State for Foreign Affairs and Defense, Pakistan Amb. Sahabzada Yaqub-Khan, Pakistan Ambassador to the U. S. Iqbal Riza, Minister-Counselor Dr. Henry A. Kissinger, Secretary of State Amb. Philip C. Habib, Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Alfred L. Atherton, Jr. Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern and South Asian Affairs Peter W. Rodman, NSC Staff DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, October 6, 1976 10:30-11:28 a.m. PLACE: The Secretary's Suite (35 А) Waldorf Towers New York City Ahmed: Tonight is the debate. Kissinger:. I read in the papers they are coming after me. I know all of Carter's advisors. They worked for me. For them to come after me for being soft, after attacking me for six years as a war criminal. [Laughter] [Coffee is served) The last time I saw your Ambassador, he immediately went back to Pakistan. The last time I saw you, you went back to Pakistan. Does this mean something? (Laughter) DECLASSIFIED A/ISS/IPS, Department of State E.O. 12958, as amended October 11, 2007 I assume you brought the answers. How is the Prime Minister? Ahmed: Very well, thank you. Kissinger: I feel a very great affection for him. Ahmed: He sends his regards and he asked me to congratulate Dr. - Kissinger on Africa. He hopes it's good for Africa, and good for President Ford. Kissinger: It wasn't done for that reason.
    [Show full text]
  • Indo-Pakistan Relations (1972-1977) Baderunissa Channah University of Massachusetts Amherst
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 1978 Indo-Pakistan relations (1972-1977) Baderunissa Channah University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Channah, Baderunissa, "Indo-Pakistan relations (1972-1977)" (1978). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 2531. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/2531 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INDO-PAKISTAN RELATIONS (1972-1977) A Thesis Presented By BADERUNISSA CHANNAH Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 1 978 Political Science INDO-PAKISTAN RELATIONS - ( 1972 1977 ) A Thesis Presented By BADERUNISSA CHANNAH Approved as to style and content by: Dr. Anwar H. Syed Chairperson of Committee Dr. Gerard Braunthal , Member ^ '/ . Dr. Glen Gordon, Chairman Department of Political Science DEDICATION To my Mother and Father-- with all my love. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter I. INTRODUCTION The Background of Indo-Paki stan Tension ] II. MAJOR DISPUTES BETWEEN INDIA AND PAKISTAN 1 -3 The Kashmir Dispute and the First War in Kashmir 1 948 “49 Rann of Kutch Dispute .... The War of 1965 !*.!!!!!! The 1971 War and Disintegration of Pakistan !!!”'* War Between India and Pakistan !!!.'!! III. ATTITUDE OF BIG POWERS TOWARDS INDIA AND PAKISTAN India's and Pakistan's Relations with the United States .
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan's Nuclear Bomb: Beyond the Non-Proliferation Regime
    Pakistan’s nuclear bomb: beyond the non-proliferation regime FARZANA SHAIKH* Among the many concerns raised in the wake of the devastating attack on the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in Washington DC on 11 September 2001 was Pakistan’s status as a nuclear power. Some feared that domestic opposition in Pakistan to its role as a ‘front-line’ state in the US cam- paign against ‘international terrorism’ would fuel a deadly coalition between Muslim extremist groups and pro-Islamic factions in the army, giving them access to nuclear weapons.1 Others were apprehensive that US dependence on Pakistan in the ‘war against terrorism’ would weaken the global nuclear non- proliferation regime by easing pressure on Pakistan to ‘cap’ its nuclear pro- gramme and freeze the development of nuclear weapons at existing levels. º Either way, there was a growing consensus that changes in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks on the United States would resurrect the debate on whether Pakistan could be trusted to act responsibly as a nuclear power given its long history of political instability. It was also reasonable to assume that Western concern about Pakistan’s nuclear weapons capability would heighten rather than diminish, and that greater efforts would be made to control Pakistan’s nuclear technology in order to prevent its falling into the hands of terrorist organiza- tions. For its part, Pakistan was expected to draw international attention to the military threat posed by India and resist any pressure to renounce the nuclear option. Bridging the gap between these diverging views is likely to be the main challenge facing arms control negotiators in the coming years.
    [Show full text]