Black Oak Quercus Velutina Tree Acorns ILLINOIS RANGE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Black Oak Quercus Velutina Tree Acorns ILLINOIS RANGE

black oak Quercus velutina Kingdom: Plantae FEATURES Division: Magnoliphyta The deciduous black oak tree may grow to a height Class: Magnoliopsida of 80 feet and a diameter of about three and one- Order: Fagales half feet. The trunk is straight. The bark is black and deeply furrowed, with a yellow or orange inner bark. Family: Fagaceae The leaves are arranged alternately on the stem. The ILLINOIS STATUS simple leaf blade has seven to nine shallow lobes, each lobe bristle-tipped. The leaf is dark green, shiny common, native and smooth on the upper surface. It is hairy all over or hairy only along the veins on the lower surface. Each leaf may be 10 inches long and eight inches wide with a five-inch leafstalk. Male and female flowers are separate but located on the same tree. The tiny flower has no petals. Male (staminate) flowers are arranged in drooping clusters, while female (pistillate) flowers are in groups of one to four. The fruit is an acorn. Acorns may be single or in groups of two. The acorn is red-brown, ovoid or ellipsoid and not more than one-half enclosed by the cup. The cup appears to have a ragged edge. BEHAVIORS The black oak may be found statewide in Illinois. This tree grows in upland woods. It flowers in April tree and May when the leaves begin to unfold. The hard, red-brown wood is used in construction, for fuel and ILLINOIS RANGE for making fence posts.. acorns © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2021. Biodiversity of Illinois. Unless otherwise noted, photos and images © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2021. Biodiversity of Illinois. Unless otherwise noted, photos and images © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2021. Biodiversity of Illinois. Unless otherwise noted, photos and images © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. leaves Aquatic Habitats none Woodland Habitats upland deciduous forests Prairie and Edge Habitats none © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2021. Biodiversity of Illinois. Unless otherwise noted, photos and images © Illinois Department of Natural Resources..

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Native Nebraska Woody Plants
THE NEBRASKA STATEWIDE ARBORETUM PRESENTS NATIVE NEBRASKA WOODY PLANTS Trees (Genus/Species – Common Name) 62. Atriplex canescens - four-wing saltbrush 1. Acer glabrum - Rocky Mountain maple 63. Atriplex nuttallii - moundscale 2. Acer negundo - boxelder maple 64. Ceanothus americanus - New Jersey tea 3. Acer saccharinum - silver maple 65. Ceanothus herbaceous - inland ceanothus 4. Aesculus glabra - Ohio buckeye 66. Cephalanthus occidentalis - buttonbush 5. Asimina triloba - pawpaw 67. Cercocarpus montanus - mountain mahogany 6. Betula occidentalis - water birch 68. Chrysothamnus nauseosus - rabbitbrush 7. Betula papyrifera - paper birch 69. Chrysothamnus parryi - parry rabbitbrush 8. Carya cordiformis - bitternut hickory 70. Cornus amomum - silky (pale) dogwood 9. Carya ovata - shagbark hickory 71. Cornus drummondii - roughleaf dogwood 10. Celtis occidentalis - hackberry 72. Cornus racemosa - gray dogwood 11. Cercis canadensis - eastern redbud 73. Cornus sericea - red-stem (redosier) dogwood 12. Crataegus mollis - downy hawthorn 74. Corylus americana - American hazelnut 13. Crataegus succulenta - succulent hawthorn 75. Euonymus atropurpureus - eastern wahoo 14. Fraxinus americana - white ash 76. Juniperus communis - common juniper 15. Fraxinus pennsylvanica - green ash 77. Juniperus horizontalis - creeping juniper 16. Gleditsia triacanthos - honeylocust 78. Mahonia repens - creeping mahonia 17. Gymnocladus dioicus - Kentucky coffeetree 79. Physocarpus opulifolius - ninebark 18. Juglans nigra - black walnut 80. Prunus besseyi - western sandcherry 19. Juniperus scopulorum - Rocky Mountain juniper 81. Rhamnus lanceolata - lanceleaf buckthorn 20. Juniperus virginiana - eastern redcedar 82. Rhus aromatica - fragrant sumac 21. Malus ioensis - wild crabapple 83. Rhus copallina - flameleaf (shining) sumac 22. Morus rubra - red mulberry 84. Rhus glabra - smooth sumac 23. Ostrya virginiana - hophornbeam (ironwood) 85. Rhus trilobata - skunkbush sumac 24. Pinus flexilis - limber pine 86. Ribes americanum - wild black currant 25.
[Show full text]
Species List For: Engelmann Woods NA 174 Species
Species List for: Engelmann Woods NA 174 Species Franklin County Date Participants Location NA List NA Nomination List List made by Maupin and Kurz, 9/9/80, and 4/21/93 WGNSS Lists Webster Groves Nature Study Society Fieldtrip Participants WGNSS Vascular Plant List maintained by Steve Turner Species Name (Synonym) Common Name Family COFC COFW Acalypha virginica Virginia copperleaf Euphorbiaceae 2 3 Acer negundo var. undetermined box elder Sapindaceae 1 0 Acer saccharum var. undetermined sugar maple Sapindaceae 5 3 Achillea millefolium yarrow Asteraceae/Anthemideae 1 3 Actaea pachypoda white baneberry Ranunculaceae 8 5 Adiantum pedatum var. pedatum northern maidenhair fern Pteridaceae Fern/Ally 6 1 Agastache nepetoides yellow giant hyssop Lamiaceae 4 3 Ageratina altissima var. altissima (Eupatorium rugosum) white snakeroot Asteraceae/Eupatorieae 2 3 Agrimonia rostellata woodland agrimony Rosaceae 4 3 Ambrosia artemisiifolia common ragweed Asteraceae/Heliantheae 0 3 Ambrosia trifida giant ragweed Asteraceae/Heliantheae 0 -1 Amelanchier arborea var. arborea downy serviceberry Rosaceae 6 3 Antennaria parlinii var. undetermined (A. plantaginifolia) plainleaf pussytoes Asteraceae/Gnaphalieae 5 5 Aplectrum hyemale putty root Orchidaceae 8 1 Aquilegia canadensis columbine Ranunculaceae 6 1 Arisaema triphyllum ssp. triphyllum (A. atrorubens) Jack-in-the-pulpit Araceae 6 -2 Aristolochia serpentaria Virginia snakeroot Aristolochiaceae 6 5 Arnoglossum atriplicifolium (Cacalia atriplicifolia) pale Indian plantain Asteraceae/Senecioneae 4 5 Arnoglossum reniforme (Cacalia muhlenbergii) great Indian plantain Asteraceae/Senecioneae 8 5 Asarum canadense wild ginger Aristolochiaceae 6 5 Asclepias quadrifolia whorled milkweed Asclepiadaceae 6 5 Asimina triloba pawpaw Annonaceae 5 0 Asplenium rhizophyllum (Camptosorus) walking fern Aspleniaceae Fern/Ally 7 5 Asplenium trichomanes ssp. trichomanes maidenhair spleenwort Aspleniaceae Fern/Ally 9 5 Srank: SU Grank: G? * Barbarea vulgaris yellow rocket Brassicaceae 0 0 Blephilia hirsuta var.
[Show full text]
Native Plant List Trees.XLS
Lower Makefield Township Native Plant List* TREES LIGHT MOISTURE TYPE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME STREET SUN PART SHADE DRY MOIST WET TREE SHADE EVERGREEN Chamaecyparis thyoides Atlantic White Cedar x x x x IIex opaca American Holly x x x x Juniperus virginiana Eastern Red Cedar x x x Picea glauca White Spruce x x x Picea pungens Blue Spruce x x x Pinus echinata Shortleaf Pine x x x Pinus resinosa Red Pine x x x Pinus rigida Pitch Pine x x Pinus strobus White Pine x x x Pinus virginiana Virginia Pine x x x Thuja occidentalis Eastern Arborvitae x x x x Tsuga canadensis Eastern Hemlock xx x DECIDUOUS Acer rubrum Red Maple x x x x x x Acer saccharinum Silver Maple x x x x Acer saccharum Sugar Maple x x x x Asimina triloba Paw-Paw x x Betula lenta Sweet Birch x x x x Betula nigra River Birch x x x x Betula populifolia Gray Birch x x x x x Carpinus caroliniana American Hornbeam x x x (C. tomentosa) Carya alba Mockernut Hickory x x x x Carya cordiformis Bitternut Hickory x x x Carya glabra Pignut Hickory x x x x x Carya ovata Shagbark Hickory x x Castanea pumila Allegheny Chinkapin xx x Celtis occidentalis Hackberry x x x x x x Crataegus crus-galli Cockspur Hawthorn x x x x Crataegus viridis Green Hawthorn x x x x Diospyros virginiana Common Persimmon x x x x Fagus grandifolia American Beech x x x x PAGE 1 Exhibit 1 TREES (cont'd) LIGHT MOISTURE TYPE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME STREET SUN PART SHADE DRY MOIST WET TREE SHADE DECIDUOUS (cont'd) Fraxinus americana White Ash x x x x Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash x x x x x Gleditsia triacanthos v.
[Show full text]
List of Approved Trees
CITY OF CAPE MAY - LIST OF APPROVED TREES COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME AESTHETIC QUALITY AND MATURE SIZE CLASS STREET OR LAWN CLASS PLANT SALT TOLERANCE ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFIT- NOTES ISA SPECIES RATING AND LIMITATIONS BIRD BENEFIT (# OF BIRDS) B AMERICAN BEECH FAGUS GRANDIFOLIA LARGE 25 50-70' BLACK OR SWEET BIRCH BETULA LENTA MEDIUM/LARGE 13 40-60' GRAY BIRCH BETULA POPULIFOLIA MEDIUM LAWN 14 20-40' YELLOW BIRCH BETULA LUTEA LARGE 13 60-80' BUTTERNUT JUGLANS CINEREAL MEDIUM/LARGE 11 40-60' C EASTERN RED CEDAR JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA MEDIUM LAWN 32 40-50' BLACK CHERRY PRUNUS SEROTINA LARGE LAWN 53 50-80' CHERRY PRUNUS SSP MEDIUM STREET OR LAWN 42 PIN OR FIRE CHERRY P. PENSYLVANICA 42 CHOKECHERRY P. VIRGINIANA SMALL LAWN 43 20-30' (UTILITY FRIENDLY) CRAB APPLE MALUS SPP SMALL LAWN 26 15-20' (UTILITY FRIENDLY) D FLOWERING DOGWOOD CORNUS FLORIDA SMALL LAWN 34 15-30' (UTILITY FRIENDLY) E ELM ULMUS SSP LARGE LAWN 18 G SOUR GUM OR BLACK TUPELO NYSSA SLYVATICA MEDIUM STREET OR LAWN 34 30-50' SWEET GUM LIQUIDAMBER STYRACIFLUA MEDIUM/LARGE STREET OR LAWN 21 40-60' H HACKBERRY CELTIS OCCIDENTALIS MEDIUM/LARGE STREET OR LAWN 25 40-60' DWARF HACKBERRY CELTIS TENUIFOLIA 25 MOCKERNUT HICKORY CARYA TOMENTOSA LARGE 60-80' PIGNUT HICKORY CARYA GLABRA LARGE 19 70-90' SHAGBARK HICKORY CARYA OVATA LARGE 19 70-90' AMERICAN HOLLY LLEX OPACA MEDIUM LAWN 13 40-50' AMERICAN HORNBEAM CARPINUS CAROLINIANA SMALL STREET OR LAWN 10 20-35' (UTILITY FRIENDLY) M SWEET BAY MAGNOLIA MAGNOLIA VIRGINANA SMALL LAWN 10-35' RED MAPLE ACER RUBRUM MEDIUM/LARGE STREET OR LAWN 5 40-60'
[Show full text]
Landscaping Near Black Walnut Trees
Selecting juglone-tolerant plants Landscaping Near Black Walnut Trees Black walnut trees (Juglans nigra) can be very attractive in the home landscape when grown as shade trees, reaching a potential height of 100 feet. The walnuts they produce are a food source for squirrels, other wildlife and people as well. However, whether a black walnut tree already exists on your property or you are considering planting one, be aware that black walnuts produce juglone. This is a natural but toxic chemical they produce to reduce competition for resources from other plants. This natural self-defense mechanism can be harmful to nearby plants causing “walnut wilt.” Having a walnut tree in your landscape, however, certainly does not mean the landscape will be barren. Not all plants are sensitive to juglone. Many trees, vines, shrubs, ground covers, annuals and perennials will grow and even thrive in close proximity to a walnut tree. Production and Effect of Juglone Toxicity Juglone, which occurs in all parts of the black walnut tree, can affect other plants by several means: Stems Through root contact Leaves Through leakage or decay in the soil Through falling and decaying leaves When rain leaches and drips juglone from leaves Nuts and hulls and branches onto plants below. Juglone is most concentrated in the buds, nut hulls and All parts of the black walnut tree produce roots and, to a lesser degree, in leaves and stems. Plants toxic juglone to varying degrees. located beneath the canopy of walnut trees are most at risk. In general, the toxic zone around a mature walnut tree is within 50 to 60 feet of the trunk, but can extend to 80 feet.
[Show full text]
Stem, Branch, and Root Wood Anatomy of Black Oak (Quercus Velutina Lam) Douglas D
Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1986 Stem, branch, and root wood anatomy of black oak (Quercus velutina Lam) Douglas D. Stokke Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Agriculture Commons, and the Wood Science and Pulp, Paper Technology Commons Recommended Citation Stokke, Douglas D., "Stem, branch, and root wood anatomy of black oak (Quercus velutina Lam) " (1986). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 8312. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/8312 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this manuscript, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. For example: • Manuscript pages may have indistinct print. In such cases, the best available copy has been filmed. • Manuscripts may not always be complete. In such cases, a note will indicate that it is not possible to obtain missing pages. • Copyrighted material may have been removed from the manuscript. In such cases, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, and charts) are photographed by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
[Show full text]
Chapter 1: Ecoregional Planning in the Interior Low Plateau
1 CHAPTER 1: ECOREGIONAL PLANNING IN THE INTERIOR LOW PLATEAU 1.1. INTRODUCTION 1.2. OVERVIEW OF PLANNING 1.2.1. Developing a Plan to Plan 1.2.2. Budget and Workplan 1.3. DESCRIPTION OF THE INTERIOR LOW PLATEAU 1.3.1. Ecological Overview 1.3.2. Ecological Systems 1.3.3. Present Land Use CHAPTER 2: PLANNING TEAMS 2.1. INTRODUCTION 2.2. THE STEERING COMMITTEE 2.3. THE CORE TEAM 2.4. TECHNICAL TEAMS 2.5. DESIGN TEAM CHAPTER 3: GATHERING THE PIECES 3.1. INTRODUCTION 3.2. DATA SOURCES AND DATA MANAGEMENT 3.2.1. Conservation Target Data 3.2.2. Geographic Information Systems 3.3. IDENTIFICATION OF CONSERVATION TARGETS, SETTING CONSERVATION GOALS, AND SELECTING TARGET ELEMENT OCCURRENCES 3.3.1. General Guidelines 3.3.2. Terrestrial Natural Communities 3.3.3. Plant Species 3.3.4. Terrestrial Invertebrates 3.3.5. Terrestrial Vertebrates (other than birds) Birds 3.3.6. Aquatic Species 3.3.7. Aquatic Communities 3.3.8. The Conservation Targets CHAPTER 4: ASSEMBLING THE PORTFOLIO 4.1. INTRODUCTION 4.2. DEVELOPING A PRELIMINARY PORTFOLIO 4.3. DESIGNING AND REFINING THE PORTFOLIO 4.3.1. Assessing Preliminary Sites 4.3.2. Representing Matrix Communities CHAPTER 5: ASSESSING THE PORTFOLIO AND SETTING PRIORITES 5.1. DESCRIPTION OF THE PORTFOLIO 5.2. IDENTIFYING ACTION SITES 5.2.1. Action Sites 5.2.2. Landscape-Scale Action Sites 5.3. MEETING CONSERVATION GOALS 5.4. PATTERNS OF THREATS AND STRATEGIES IN THE PORTFOLIO 5.4.1. Stresses and Sources of Stress 5.4.2. Strategies CHAPTER 6: IMPLEMENTING THE CONSERVATION PLAN 6.1.
[Show full text]
The Distribution of the Genus Quercus in Illinois: an Update
Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science received 3/19/02 (2002), Volume 95, #4, pp. 261-284 accepted 6/23/02 The Distribution of the Genus Quercus in Illinois: An Update Nick A. Stoynoff Glenbard East High School Lombard, IL 60148 William J. Hess The Morton Arboretum Lisle, IL 60532 ABSTRACT This paper updates the distribution of members of the black oak [section Lobatae] and white oak [section Quercus] groups native to Illinois. In addition a brief discussion of Illinois’ spontaneously occurring hybrid oaks is presented. The findings reported are based on personal collections, herbarium specimens, and published documents. INTRODUCTION The genus Quercus is well known in Illinois. Although some taxa are widespread, a few have a limited distribution. Three species are of “special concern” and are listed as either threatened (Quercus phellos L., willow oak; Quercus montana Willd., rock chestnut oak) or endangered (Quercus texana Buckl., Nuttall’s oak) [Illinois Endangered Species Pro- tection Board 1999]. The Illinois Natural History Survey has dedicated a portion of its website [www.INHS.uiuc.edu] to the species of Quercus in Illinois. A discussion of all oaks from North America is available online from the Flora of North America Associa- tion [http://hua.huh.harvard.edu/FNA/] and in print [Jensen 1997, Nixon 1997, Nixon and Muller 1997]. The National Plant Data Center maintains an extensive online database [http://plants.usda.gov] documenting information on plants in the United States and its territories. Extensive oak data are available there [U.S.D.A. 2001]. During the last 40 years the number of native oak species recognized for Illinois by vari- ous floristic authors has varied little [Tables 1 & 2].
[Show full text]
Mountain Oak Forests Occur on Blue Ridge and Foothills Slopes and Ridges and Are Dominated by Various Species of Quercus
MOUNTAIN OAK FORESTS Concept: Mountain Oak Forests occur on Blue Ridge and foothills slopes and ridges and are dominated by various species of Quercus. Most of them were once naturally dominated or codominated by Castanea dentata. These forests make up much of the mountain landscape at low to moderate elevations and may be extensive at all but the highest elevations. Distinguishing Features: Mountain Oak Forests are distinguished from most other mountain communities by dominance or codominance by Quercus and, formerly, Castanea dentata. Rare examples may be dominated bv Carya spp., or by Vitis in natural forest gaps. Montane Oak Forests can usually be easily distinguished from Piedmont and Coastal Plain Oak Forests by location on or above the Blue Ridge escarpment, or in rugged areas in the South Mountains, Brushy Mountains, and other mountain-like foothill ranges. They are also distinguished by flora. A large pool of species is typical of the Blue Ridge but is scarce or absent to the east, at least in North Carolina. Castanea dentata, still present as root sprouts in many occurrences, was once the most important distinguishing species. Rhododendron maximum, Rhododendron catawbiense, Rhododendron calendulaceum, Gaylussacia baccata, Pyrularia pubera, Pinus strobus, Magnolia fraseri, Tsuga caroliniana, Tsuga canadensis, Magnolia acuminata, Acer pensylvanicum, Pinus pungens, and Pinus rigida are additional species sometimes in Mountain Oak Forests but rarely present in Piedmont communities. Quercus falcata, Quercus stellata, and Pinus echinata are typical Piedmont species that are usually absent in Mountain Oak Forests but may be present in particular communities. Synonyms: Sites: Mountain Oak Forests occur on open slopes, ridge tops, spur ridges, and even low rises and flats in valleys.
[Show full text]
Vascular Plant Inventory and Plant Community Classification for Mammoth Cave National Park
VASCULAR PLANT INVENTORY AND PLANT COMMUNITY CLASSIFICATION FOR MAMMOTH CAVE NATIONAL PARK Report for the Vertebrate and Vascular Plant Inventories: Appalachian Highlands and Cumberland/Piedmont Network Prepared by NatureServe for the National Park Service Southeast Regional Office February 2010 NatureServe is a non-profit organization providing the scientific basis for effective conservation action. A NatureServe Technical Report Prepared for the National Park Service under Cooperative Agreement H 5028 01 0435. Citation: Milo Pyne, Erin Lunsford Jones, and Rickie White. 2010. Vascular Plant Inventory and Plant Community Classification for Mammoth Cave National Park. Durham, North Carolina: NatureServe. © 2010 NatureServe NatureServe Southern U. S. Regional Office 6114 Fayetteville Road, Suite 109 Durham, NC 27713 919-484-7857 International Headquarters 1101 Wilson Boulevard, 15th Floor Arlington, Virginia 22209 www.natureserve.org National Park Service Southeast Regional Office Atlanta Federal Center 1924 Building 100 Alabama Street, S.W. Atlanta, GA 30303 The view and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government. This report consists of the main report along with a series of appendices with information about the plants and plant communities found at the site. Electronic files have been provided to the National Park Service in addition to hard copies. Current information on all communities described here can be found on NatureServe Explorer at http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/ Cover photo: Mature Interior Low Plateau mesophytic forest above the Green River, Mammoth Cave National Park - Photo by Milo Pyne ii Acknowledgments This report was compiled thanks to a team including staff from the National Park Service and NatureServe.
[Show full text]
Common Oaks of the Chicago Region 1 the Field Museum – Division of Environment, Culture, and Conservation
Quercus of the Chicago Region, USA Common Oaks of the Chicago Region 1 The Field Museum – Division of Environment, Culture, and Conservation Produced by: Kathryn Stiver Corio and Rebecca Schillo, The Field Museum [http://fieldmuseum.org/explore/department/ecco] Images © Kathryn Corio, Ms, Botanist, Cofrin Center for Biodiversity, Green Bay, WI and John Balaban, The Field Museum © Environment, Culture, and Conservation, The Field Museum, Chicago, IL 60605 USA [http://www.fmnh.org/IDtools] [[email protected]] version 1 10/2012 GROUP 1: Unlobed to shallowly- lobed leaves 1 Quercus bicolor Key Characters: 1) Upper leaf surface dark green; underside whitish and covered in short soft hairs 2) Acorn borne on long fuzzy Swamp White Oak stalks 3) Frequent in moist woodlands and floodplains 4) Distinguished from white and bur oaks by its shallow leaf lobes. 2 Quercus imbricaria Key Characters: 1) Oblong leaves with smooth edges 2) Acorn nearly globular 3) Locally common in dry woodlands. Shingle Oak 3 Quercus muhlenbergii Key Characters: 1) Leaves long, slender, coarsely toothed 2) 9 to 13 teeth on each side 3) Occasionally found on rocky, wooded Chinquapin Oak slopes. GROUP 2: Lobed leaves with pointed bristle tips 4 Quercus velutina Key Characters: 1) Upperside of the leaf shiny, underside scurfy and hairy 2) Inner bark yellow-orange, very bitter 3) Common Black Oak in dry, sandy, upland terrain. Quercus of the Chicago Region, USA Common Oaks of the Chicago Region 2 The Field Museum – Division of Environment, Culture, and Conservation Produced by: Kathryn Stiver Corio and Rebecca Schillo, The Field Museum [http://fieldmuseum.org/explore/department/ecco] Images © Kathryn Corio, Ms, Botanist, Cofrin Center for Biodiversity, Green Bay, WI and John Balaban, The Field Museum © Environment, Culture, and Conservation, The Field Museum, Chicago, IL 60605 USA [http://www.fmnh.org/IDtools] [[email protected]] version 1 10/2012 GROUP 2 cont.
[Show full text]
Forest Dynamics in a Natural Area of the Southern Ridge and Valley, Tennessee University of Tennessee
Forest Dynamics in a Natural Area of the Southern Ridge and Valley, Tennessee University of Tennessee RES EAR C H ART Ie ABSTRACT: This study was initiated to document forest development in the oldest natural area in the Ridge and Valley of east Tennessee. The ljams Nature Reserve was established in 1910 and provided the opportunity to document secondary succession of the oldest upland forest reserve in the region. We established forest inventory plots in the original land holding of the Ijams family to quantify species composition, stand structure, and successional dynamics. We also analyzed the radial growth patterns of trees to document stand age, recruitment, and the disturbance regime of the reserve. The forest was • dominated by Quercus alba and Liriodendron tulipifera while AceI' saccharum and Fagus grandifolia had high densities in the understory. Liriodendron tulipifera was the most important species in the stand because it colonized the site following agricultural abandonment and subsequently established in Forest Dynamics in a small canopy gaps. The stand had a reverse J-shaped diameter structure typical of regenerating forests. The forest experienced one stand-wide disturbance event likely attributed to the decline of Castanea Natu ral Area of the dentata in the 1920s. The return interval of stand-wide disturbances was much longer than what has been reported in other eastern hardwood forests. With the exception of this one stand-wide release, the disturbance regime was characterized by localized, asynchronous events that influenced only neighbor Southern Ridge and ing trees. Under the current disturbance regime; composition of the stand is projected to change as shade-tolerant mesophytes in the understory (A.
[Show full text]