The Prut Basin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Prut Basin Environmental Protection of International River Basins Project This project is funded by Contract No 2011/279-666. A project implemented by a Consortium the European Union led by Hulla & Co. Human Dynamics KG DEVELOPMENT OF DRAFT RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SELECTED PILOT BASIN IN UKRAINE - THE PRUT BASIN DRAFT Prepared by UNENGO “MAMA-86” February 2015 1 Environmental Protection of International River Basins Project This project is funded by Contract No 2011/279-666. A project implemented by a Consortium the European Union led by Hulla & Co. Human Dynamics KG TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .....................................................................................................................……..……5 1. Characteristic of the characteristics of the Prut river basin district…………………..………..….. ..6 1.1. Description of the Prut river basin district…………………………..………………………………6 1.1.1. Identification of the Prut River Basin…………………………………………………7 1.1.2. Relief…… ………………………………………………………………………………………….8 1.1.3. Geology… ………………………………………………………………………………….…..9 1.1.4. Soil………… …………………………………………………………………………….……..9 1.1.5. Vegetation…… …………………………………………………………………………..……..9 1.1.6. Climate ……………………………………………………………………………………… 10 1.1.7. Hydrological regime …………………………………………………………………………..10 1.2. Typology and identification of surface water bodies…………………………………………… .14 1.3. Typology and identification of groundwater bodies………………………………………………21 2. A summary of significant pressure and impact of human activity on the status of surface water and groundwater ………………………………………………………………… ………….24 2.1. Estimation of point source pollution………………………………………………………………29 2.2. Estimation of diffuse source pollution, including a summary of land use………………………...32 2.3. Estimation of pressures on the quantitative status of water including abstractions……………….36 2.4. Analysis of other impacts of human activity on the status of water………………………………37 3. Determination and mapping of territories that are protected …………………………………. 39 3.1. Register of water bodies for withdrawal of water intended for the drinking water supply……….39 3.2. Register of protected areas for protection of surface and ground waters and preservation of Habitats of species that directly depend on water……………………………………………………40 3.3. Water protection zones and river coastal protection strips………………………………………44 4. Monitoring Programme and Networks in the Prut River basin …………………………...46 4.1. Surface water Monitoring Programme……………………………………………………….…46 4.2. Groundwater Monitoring Programme ………………………………………………………….54 5. Environmental Objectives and Exemptions ..............................................................................59 5.1. Environmental objectives ...........................................................................................................59 5.2. Exemption According to WFD...................................................................................................60 5.3. Cross-cutting issues that will apply to future infrastructure projects ........................................60 6. Economic analysis of water use in the Prut River Basin ..........................................................62 6.1 Relevant water uses and economic meaning...........................................................................…62 6.2. Economic analysis of water use ..........................................................................................….668 6.3. Economic control tools..................................................................................................................63 6.4. Cost-effectiveness as a criterion for selecting measures to achieve reduction targets…………. 66 7. Programme of measures ……………….......................................................................................67 7.1. Basic and Supplemented Measures on Maintenance and Restoration of Water Bodies…………67 7.2. Cross-cutting issues ……………………………………………………………………………. 77 8. A summary of the public information and consultation measures taken, their results and the changes to the plan made as a consequence ……………………………………………………79 9. A list of competent authorities ……………………………………………………………………80 10. The contact points and procedures for obtaining the background documentation and information…………………………………………………………………………………………… 83 2 Environmental Protection of International River Basins Project This project is funded by Contract No 2011/279-666. A project implemented by a Consortium the European Union led by Hulla & Co. Human Dynamics KG Abbreviations and Acronyms As arsenic AWB Artificial Water Body BOD biochemical oxygen demand BUWR River basin management authority Ca calcium Cd Cadmium CIS Common Implementation Strategy (for WFD) Cl Chloride DO dissolved oxygen DWPA drinking water protected areas EC Electric conductivity EPIRB Environmental Protection of International River Basins EU European Union F Fluorine Fe Iron GIS geographic information system GW Groundwater GWB groundwater body GWD GWD- The EU Directive 2006/118/EC on the Protection of Groundwater Against Pollution and Deterioration (referred to as “Groundwater Directive”) GWDTE groundwater dependent terrestrial ecosystems GWL groundwater level HCO 3 hydrocarbonate Hg Mercury HMWB Heavily Modified Water Body HPP Hydro Power Plant ISO International Standardisation Organisation IWRM Integrated Water Resources Management JFS Joint Field Survey K potassium ion // hydraulic conductivity/coefficient of permeability of aquifer M total mineralisation MAC maximum allowable concentration MENR Ministry for Ecology and Natural resources Mg magnesium m3, m 2 cubic meter, square meter mg-eq/l milligram-equivalent per litre = [(mg/l) / eq weight] mg/l milligrams per litre Na Sodium NGO Nongovernment organisation NH 4 Ammonium CNNP Carpathian National Nature Park NO 2 Nitrite NO 3 Nitrate PAH polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon Pb Lead PCE Tetrachloroethylene PoM programme of measures 3 Environmental Protection of International River Basins Project This project is funded by Contract No 2011/279-666. A project implemented by a Consortium the European Union led by Hulla & Co. Human Dynamics KG PRB Prut River Basin PVC polyvinylchloride Q well discharge (l/s) SO 4 Sulphate Sr Strontium TCE Trichloroethylene TDS total dissolved solids TOC total organic carbon WB Water Body WFD Water Framework Directive 4 Environmental Protection of International River Basins Project This project is funded by Contract No 2011/279-666. A project implemented by a Consortium the European Union led by Hulla & Co. Human Dynamics KG INTRODUCTION This Prut River Basin Management Plan (Prut RBMP) has been prepared in the context of the project “Environmental Protection of International River Basins Project (EPIRB)” funded by the European Commission – Directorate General for Development and Cooperation - Europe Aid and implemented between January 2012 and January 2016 by the consortium led by Hulla & Co “Human Dynamics”. The overall objective of the project is to improve the quality of water in the trans-boundary river basins of the wider Black Sea region and Belarus. The specific objectives of this project are: • to improve availability and quality of data on the ecological, chemical, and hydro-morphological status of trans-boundary river basins including groundwater, and • to develop River Basin Management Plans (RBMPs) for selected river basins/sub-river basins according to the requirements of the Water Framework Directive (WFD). According WFD States should aim to achieve the objective of at least good water status by defining and implementing the necessary measures within integrated programmes of measures, taking into account existing Community requirements. Where good water status already exists, it should be maintained. For groundwater, in addition to the requirements of good status, any significant and sustained upward trend in the concentration of any pollutant should be identified and reversed. River basin management plan is produced for each river basin district lying entirely within their territory. In the case of an international river basin district falling entirely within the Community, states shall ensure coordination with the aim of producing a single international river basin management plan. The key aim regarding the development of the RBMP for the Prut pilot sub-basin is to improve understanding of stakeholders on key elements of the WFD and river basin planning process and to integrate management of water resources (surface water and ground water) within the pilot basin district to achieve environmental objectives. In 2012 Ministry of Environmental Protection of Ukraine approved the order on the Basic Plan on adaptation of environmental legislation of Ukraine to the European Union legal framework (Basic Plan approximation). In the Plan there is a list of respect EU legislations which are in accordance with the list of EU Directives of Annex XXIX Chapter 6 of Part V to the Association Agreement between Ukraine and EU, which was signed in July 2014 and ratified by Ukraine in October 2014. Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine (№ 847-p, September 17, 2014) on Action Plan for the implementation of the Association Agreement between Ukraine, on the one hand, and the European Union, the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, on the other hand, was adopted on 2014-2017 years period. According to this order MENR and other central executive authorities were to develop and submit to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine by 1st of November 2014 draft plans
Recommended publications
  • PEP: Zastavna District Administration, Chernivtsi Oblast (Region)
    Logo • About • blog • Investigations • Contacts • Open Data • Scoring uk • About • blog • Investigations • Contacts • Open Data • Scoring content • Main page • Politically Exposed Persons • Zastavna District Administration, Chernivtsi Oblast (Region) Last dossier update: Feb. 27, 2021 PDF photo Zastavna District Administration, Chernivtsi Oblast (Region) Сategory State agency Taxpayer's 04062133 number Current state on the dissolvement stage since Jan. 28, 2021 59400, Чернівецька обл., Заставнівський р-н, місто Address Заставна, ВУЛ. В. ЧОРНОВОЛА, будинок 6 icon Connected PEPs Type of Власність, Name Period connection % Confirmed: Feb. 27, 2021 Jan. 30, РОЗПОРЯДЖЕННЯ Kozariichuk Head of the 2020 — ПРЕЗИДЕНТА Dmytro District State Feb. №81/2020-рп Vasylovych Administration 26, РОЗПОРЯДЖЕННЯ 2021 ПРЕЗИДЕНТА №113/2021-рп March Confirmed: July 15, 2019 Head of the 31, Kitar Yurii Відповідь АПУ.pdf District State 2015 — Vasylovych РОЗПОРЯДЖЕННЯ Administration July 11, ПРЕЗИДЕНТА 2019 №197/2019-рп Acting Head July 29, Moldovan of District 2019 — Vasyl State Jan. 30, Confirmed: Jan. 31, 2020 Mykolaiovych Administration 2020 Show more Show less Visualization of connections icon Structure Власність, Name Position Period % Confirmed: Feb. 27, 2021 Jan. 30, РОЗПОРЯДЖЕННЯ Kozariichuk Head of the 2020 — ПРЕЗИДЕНТА Dmytro District State Feb. №81/2020-рп Vasylovych Administration 26, РОЗПОРЯДЖЕННЯ 2021 ПРЕЗИДЕНТА №113/2021-рп March Confirmed: July 15, 2019 Head of the 31, Kitar Yurii Відповідь АПУ.pdf District State 2015 — Vasylovych РОЗПОРЯДЖЕННЯ Administration
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 1989
    їізНегі by the Ukrainian National Association Inc.. a fraternal non-profit association| ШrainianWeel;! V Vol. LVII No. 7 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 12,1989 50 cents Back in the USSR Ukrainian-language school students Unrest in Moldavia underscores from Kiev participate in exchange smoldering nationalities issue by John Kun The youngsters from Ukraine arrived only a little over a year after Phineas JERSEY CITY, N.J. - The second vement for the Defense and Support of UNA Washington Office Anderson, headmaster of Green Fields smallest republic in the Soviet Union, Perestroika, told Andrew Wilson of the WASHINGTON - Seven students Country Day School, and George Moldavia, has become the latest re­ London Observer that "We are not Kostilyov, director of Kiev School No. public to confront Moscow in regard to separatists, but we want to preserve our and two teachers from School No. 155 in Kiev are participating in a unique 155, began titscussing the possibility .of the nationality question. culture. While the Moldavians look an exchange between their schools. Crowds of Moldavians marched culturally to Rumania, they claim exchange program with students from through the streets of Kishinev, the fraternity with the Baltic republics' the Green Fields Country Day School in In 1988, the United States Infor­ capital city on January 22, chanting Democratic Fronts. Tucson, Ariz. The students, age 13 to 16 mation Agency conducted a competi­ anti-government slogans. The protest, According to Mr. Rozhka, since 1970 and in grades 7 through 10, are part of tion for student exchange projects organized by the Mateyvich Club, a it has been impossible to buy a Ru­ an exchange underwritten by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Map of the European Inland Waterway Network – Carte Du Réseau Européen Des Voies Navigables – Карта Европейской Сети Внутренних Водных Путей
    Map of the European Inland Waterway Network – Carte du réseau européen des voies navigables – Карта европейской сети внутренних водных путей Emden Berlin-Spandauer Schiahrtskanal 1 Берлин-Шпандауэр шиффартс канал 5.17 Delfzijl Эмден 2.50 Arkhangelsk Делфзейл Архангельск Untere Havel Wasserstraße 2 Унтере Хафель водный путь r e Teltowkanal 3 Тельтов-канал 4.25 d - O Leeuwarden 4.50 2.00 Леуварден Potsdamer Havel 4 Потсдамер Хафель 6.80 Groningen Harlingen Гронинген Харлинген 3.20 - 5.45 5.29-8.49 1.50 2.75 р водный п 1.40 -Оде . Papenburg 4.50 El ель r Wasserstr. Kemi Папенбург 2.50 be аф Ode 4.25 нканал Х vel- Кеми те Ha 2.50 юс 4.25 Luleå Belomorsk K. К Den Helder Küsten 1.65 4.54 Лулео Беломорск Хелдер 7.30 3.00 IV 1.60 3.20 1.80 E m О - S s Havel K. 3.60 eve Solikamsk д rn a е ja NE T HERLANDS Э р D Соликамск м Хафель-К. vin с a ная Б Север Дви 1 III Berlin е на 2 4.50 л IV B 5.00 1.90 о N O R T H S E A Meppel Берлин e м 3.25 l 11.00 Меппел o о - 3.50 m р 1.30 IV О с а 2 2 де - o к 4.30 р- прее во r 5.00 б Ш дн s о 5.00 3.50 ь 2.00 Sp ый k -Б 3.00 3.25 4.00 л ree- er Was п o а Э IV 3 Od ser .
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Proposal (Project) Application Form of GREENFIЕLD
    Investment proposal (project) application form of GREENFIЕLD land lot General information Title of the investment proposal (project) Construction of the recreational complex «Stanchyna» Location (district, city/village, street), land photo, Bahna vil., Vyzhnytsia district, Chernivtsi region scheme of location Owner (owners) Community of Bahna vil. Available documents, that certify the ownership General plan of construction (official act, certificate of ownership) Preliminary cost (balanced cost, assessed value) 100,0 ths. UAH The actual usage Pasture Technical parameters of a land lot Area of the available land lot, ha 45,4 Border surroundings (description, scheme) Borders on the state forestry Level difference on the land lot, m 50 m Cadastral end use Pasture Proposed end use For construction of touristic and recreational center, skiing track Ground-based obstacles (risk of flood and No obstacles landslide, ecological conditions) Underground obstacles (level of surface and No obstacles subterranean waters) Limitations in use (due to construction, ecology According to the requirements of land ownership etc.) and good-neighborly relations Utilities Water (availability, parameters) Distance to the source of fresh water – 250 m Drainage system (availability, parameters) Not available Supplying with gas (availability, parameters) Distance to the gas supplying net – 3,1 km. Electricity (availability, parameters) Distance to the available electrical substation -1 km Availability Ways of communication to the object (autoroads, Automobile gravel
    [Show full text]
  • Transboundary Water Management in the Danube River Basin
    TransboundaryTransboundary WaterWater ManagementManagement inin thethe DanubeDanube RiverRiver BasinBasin OvidiuOvidiu GABORGABOR DeputyDeputy GeneralGeneral DirectorDirector NationalNational AdminstrationAdminstration ““ApeleApele RomaneRomane”” Content Presentation • Danube River Basin • Transboundary Water Management • Joint Action Program • WFD Implementation • Flood Action Program • Transboundary Cooperation within Danube Basin- examples The Danube River Basin • 800.000 km2 • 81 million people • 13 countries (+5) About Romania • 97.8 % of the RO surface is included in the DRB • 30 % of the DRB surface is in Romania •27 % of the DRB population is leaving in Romania Transboundary Danube Water Management - Constraints Î Regional social and economic disparities Î The particular situation of transition countries and the requirements for EU accession Î Major tributaries are transboundary rivers Countries in the Danube River Basin Small territories Germany Croatia Austria Serbia & Muntenegro Switzerland Czech Republic Bulgaria Italy Slovak Republic Romania Poland Hungary Moldova Albania Slovenia Ukraine Macedonia Bosnia-Herzegovina European Commission ICPDR 6 MAIN WATER MANAGEMENT GOAL ASSURE THE PROTECTION OF WATER AND ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN DANUBE RIVER BASIN 7 DWM Policies & Actions Joint Action Programme WFD Implementation Flood Action Programme JAP Policies and Strategies Î River Basin Management and implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive; Î Emission inventory and pollution reduction; Î Restoration
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Second Field School in Ivano-Frankivsk
    Second Field School in Ivano-Frankivsk REPORT: The Second Field School Ivano-Frankivsk Region, Ukraine July 21-August 10, 2010 Prepared by Dr. Maria Kaspina, Dr. Boris Khaimovich & Dr. Vladimir Levin Not a single taxi driver in Ivano-Frankivsk knows where the synagogue is located, although its massive building stands only 50 meters away from the central square bustling with people at its shops and restaurants. The once vibrant Jewish community of Eastern Galicia, numbering half a million people, was not only eradicated by the Nazis and their supporters during the Holocaust, but it has also faded from the memory of local inhabitants. The aim of our field school and the entire Jewish History in Galicia and Bukovina project is to document, collect and revive remnants - physical as well as intangible - that can still be recorded, preserved and revived after 65 years of Jewish absence from the region. Towards this aim, the Second Field School arrived at Ivano-Frankivsk (formerly Stanisławów) during the summer of 2010. The Second Field School in the Ivano-Frankivsk Region took place from July 21 to August 10, 2010. It was organized by the Jewish History in Galicia and Bukovina project and the Moscow 1 Center for University Teaching of Jewish Civilization Sefer. Fifteen students under the guidance of five scholars engaged in the documentation of Jewish history. The school was composed of three teams: one documenting Jewish cemeteries, another recording oral history and ethnographical materials from the local residents and the third team surveying towns and villages in the region. The complex approach applied towards the remnants of Jewish history allows for exploration in the fullest possible way.
    [Show full text]
  • Exceptional Floods in the Prut Basin, Romania, in the Context of Heavy
    1 Exceptional floods in the Prut basin, Romania, in the context of 2 heavy rains in the summer of 2010 3 4 Gheorghe Romanescu1, Cristian Constantin Stoleriu 5 Alexandru Ioan Cuza, University of Iasi, Faculty of Geography and Geology, Department of 6 Geography, Bd. Carol I, 20 A, 700505 Iasi, Romania 7 8 Abstract. The year 2010 was characterized by devastating flooding in Central and Eastern 9 Europe, including Romania, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Bosnia-Herzegovina. This 10 study focuses on floods that occurred during the summer of 2010 in the Prut River basin, 11 which has a high percentage of hydrotechnical infrastructure. Strong floods occurred in 12 eastern Romania on the Prut River, which borders the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine, and 13 the Siret River. Atmospheric instability from 21 June-1 July 2010 caused remarkable amounts 14 of rain, with rates of 51.2 mm/50 min and 42.0 mm/30 min. In the middle Prut basin, there are 15 numerous ponds that help mitigate floods as well as provide water for animals, irrigation, and 16 so forth. The peak discharge of the Prut River during the summer of 2010 was 2,310 m3/s at 17 the Radauti Prut gauging station. High discharges were also recorded on downstream 18 tributaries, including the Baseu, Jijia, and Miletin. High discharges downstream occurred 19 because of water from the middle basin and the backwater from the Danube (a historic 20 discharge of 16,300 m3/s). The floods that occurred in the Prut basin in the summer of 2010 21 could not be controlled completely because the discharges far exceeded foreseen values.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnicity, Confession and Intercultural Dialogue at the European Union's
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Ethnicity, Confession and Intercultural Dialogue at the European Union’s East Border Brie, Mircea and Horga, Ioan and Şipoş, Sorin University of Oradea, Romania 2011 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/44082/ MPRA Paper No. 44082, posted 31 Jan 2013 05:28 UTC ETHNICITY, CONFESSION AND INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE AT THE EUROPEAN UNION EASTERN BORDER ETHNICITY, CONFESSION AND INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE AT THE EUROPEAN UNION EASTERN BORDER Mircea BRIE Ioan HORGA Sorin ŞIPOŞ (Coordinators) Debrecen/Oradea 2011 This present volume contains the papers of the international conference Ethnicity, Confession and Intercultural Dialogue at the European Union‟s East Border, held in Oradea between 2nd-5th of June 2011, organized by Institute for Euroregional Studies Oradea-Debrecen, University of Oradea and Department of International Relations and European Studies, with the support of the European Commission and Bihor County Council. CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY STUDIES Mircea BRIE Ethnicity, Religion and Intercultural Dialogue in the European Border Space.......11 Ioan HORGA Ethnicity, Religion and Intercultural Education in the Curricula of European Studies .......19 MINORITY AND MAJORITY IN THE EASTERN EUROPEAN AREA Victoria BEVZIUC Electoral Systems and Minorities Representations in the Eastern European Area........31 Sergiu CORNEA, Valentina CORNEA Administrative Tools in the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Ethnic Minorities .............................................................................................................47
    [Show full text]
  • “Romanian Waters”, Head of River Basin Management Plans Office, Bucharest, Romania
    NATIONAL ADMNISTRATION “ROMANIAN WATERS” Romania key input to the Second Assessment of Transboundary Rivers, Lakes and Groundwaters under the UNECE Water Convention Prut River Basin CORINA COSMINA BOSCORNEA, PhD National Administration “Romanian Waters ”, Head of River Basin Management Plans Office, Bucharest, Romania Ukraine - Kiev, 28 th April 2010 Second Assessment of Transboundary Rivers, Lakes and Romanian transboundary river basins Information about transboundary river basins: •Somes/Szamos, •Mures/Maros, •Crisuri, Tisza River •Banat, basin •Siret, •Prut, •Dobrogea-Litoral , •Arges-Vedea Danube •Banat River Basin •Buzau-Ialomita District •Jiu Romanian river basins Prut river basins in the Danube river basin district Prut river basin 1. General description of the Prut river basin The total Population Area in area of the Major density in the Shared the Character with an river basin transbound area in the countries country in average elevation in the ary river country km² (%) country (persons/km 2) upland character Romania, (Ukrainian 10,990 Ukraine and 27820 Prut Carpathians) and 55 (39.5%) Moldova lowland (lower reaches) • The Prut river basin is shared by Ukraine, Romania and Moldova Its source is in the Ukrainian Carpathians. Later, the Prut forms the border between Romania and Moldova. • The rivers Lapatnic, Drageste and Racovet are transboundary tributaries in the Prut sub-basin; they cross the Ukrainian- Moldavian border. • The Prut River’s major national tributaries are the rivers Cheremosh and Derelui, (Ukraine), Baseu, Jijia,
    [Show full text]
  • Untitled Spreadsheet
    Priority sector for Name of the project in Summary of the project in English, including goal and results (up Full name of the applicant Total project budget Requested amount ID Competition program LOT Type of project culture and arts English to 100 words) organization in English (in UAH) from UCF (in UAH) The television program is based on facts taken from historical sources, which testify to a fundamental distortion of the history of the Russian Empire, aimed at creating a historical mythology that Muscovy and Kievan Rus have common historical roots, that Muscovy has "inheritance rights" on Kievan Rus. The ordinary fraud of the Muscovites, who had taken possession of the past of The cycle of science- the Grand Duchy of Kiev and its people, dealt a terrible cognitive television blow to the Ukrainian ethnic group. Our task is to expose programs "UKRAINE. the falsehood and immorality of Moscow mythology on Union of STATE HISTORY. Part the basis of true facts. Without a great past, it is impossible Cinematographers "Film 3AVS11-0069 Audiovisual Arts LOT 1 TV content Individual Audiovisual Arts I." Kievan Rus " to create a great nation. Logos" 1369589 1369589 New eight 15-minute programs of the cycle “Game of Fate” are continuation of the project about outstanding historical figures of Ukrainian culture, art and science. The project consists of stories of the epistolary genre and memoirs. Private world of talented personalities, complex and ambiguous, is at the heart of the stories. These are facts from biographies that are not written in textbooks, encyclopedias, or wikipedia, but which are much more likely to attract the attention of different audiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Vasyl BOTUSHANSKYY(Chernivtsi) the SOURCES of STATE
    Vasyl BOTUSHANSKYY(Chernivtsi) THE SOURCES OF STATE ARCHIVES OF CHERNIVTSI REGION AS COMPONENT OF STUDIING THE EVENTS OF THE WORLD WAR I AT BUKOVYNA This article gives an overview of the sources of the State Archives of Chernivtsi region, including funds of the Austrian and Russian occupation administrations acting in Bukovina in 1914 - 1918, which recorded information about the events of World War I in the region and that can serve as sources for research of the history of these events. Keywords: Bucovina, archive, fund, information, military, troops, war, occupation, empire, requisition, refugees, internment, deportation. 1914 year - the year of the First World War, but not last, and a hundred years it was the most ambitious and bloody war, which is known to humanity, killed 10 million. People., Injuring about 20 million. The war engulfed vast areas of the world, first of all the leading countries of military-political blocs: the Triple (Germany and Austria-Hungary) and the Entente (Russia, Great Britain and France). Have covered the war and area of residence of the Ukrainian people - eastern Ukraine, which was part of the Russian Empire and the West in the empire of Austria-Hungary, including Galicia and Bukovina. Ukrainian tragedy of this war was that mobilized in the opposite army, they were forced to kill each other. Coverage of the history of World War II Ukrainian lands, including and Bukovina, has dedicated many works, and this research continues. Of course, they would have been impossible without the historical sources. For the sake of objectivity it should be recognized that archaeography Bukovina already has on this issue considerable achievements, but many more sources should be identified and investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine
    Syracuse University SURFACE Religion College of Arts and Sciences 2005 Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine Samuel D. Gruber United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/rel Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Gruber, Samuel D., "Jewish Cemeteries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine" (2005). Full list of publications from School of Architecture. Paper 94. http://surface.syr.edu/arc/94 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religion by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JEWISH CEMETERIES, SYNAGOGUES, AND MASS GRAVE SITES IN UKRAINE United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad 2005 UNITED STATES COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICA’S HERITAGE ABROAD Warren L. Miller, Chairman McLean, VA Members: Ned Bandler August B. Pust Bridgewater, CT Euclid, OH Chaskel Besser Menno Ratzker New York, NY Monsey, NY Amy S. Epstein Harriet Rotter Pinellas Park, FL Bingham Farms, MI Edgar Gluck Lee Seeman Brooklyn, NY Great Neck, NY Phyllis Kaminsky Steven E. Some Potomac, MD Princeton, NJ Zvi Kestenbaum Irving Stolberg Brooklyn, NY New Haven, CT Daniel Lapin Ari Storch Mercer Island, WA Potomac, MD Gary J. Lavine Staff: Fayetteville, NY Jeffrey L. Farrow Michael B. Levy Executive Director Washington, DC Samuel Gruber Rachmiel
    [Show full text]