Choosing Your Hospital
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Derby and Nottingham Transforming Cities Fund Tranche 2 Strategic Outline Business Case November 2019
Derby and Nottingham Transforming Cities Fund Tranche 2 Strategic Outline Business Case November 2019 Derby and Nottingham Transforming Cities Fund Tranche 2 Strategic Outline Business Case November 2019 Produced by: With support from: Contact: Chris Carter Head of Transport Strategy Nottingham City Council 4th Floor, Loxley House Station Street Nottingham NG2 3NG 0115 876 3940 [email protected] Derby & Nottingham - TCF Tranche 2 – Strategic Outline Business Case Document Control Sheet Ver. Project Folder Description Prep. Rev. App. Date V1-0 F:\2926\Project Files Final Draft MD, NT CC, VB 28/11/19 GT, LM, IS V0-2 F:\2926\Project Files Draft (ii) MD, NT CC, VB 25/11/19 GT, LM, IS V0-1 F:\2926\Project Files Draft (i) MD, NT NT 11/11/19 GT, LM, IS i Derby & Nottingham - TCF Tranche 2 – Strategic Outline Business Case Table of Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 Bid overview ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Structure of the remainder of this document ................................................................................... 2 2. Strategic Case: The Local Context ................................................................................... 3 Key statistics and background ............................................................................................................... -
Staffordshire PCC Appeal
BEFORE THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER BETWEEN PRIVACY INTERNATIONAL Applicant - and - STAFFORDSHIRE POLICE AND CRIME COMMISSIONER Respondent _______________________________ GROUNDS OF APPEAL _______________________________ I. Introduction and Summary 1. The Applicant is Privacy International, a registered UK charity, campaigning for the right to privacy. 2. On 1 November 2016, Privacy International wrote to the Staffordshire Police and Crime Commissioner (“PCC”), Home Office, National Police Chiefs Council, National Crime Agency, Metropolitan Police Service, South Yorkshire Police, Avon and Somerset PCC, Kent PCC, Warwickshire PCC, West Mercia PCC and West Midlands PCC requesting information about the purchase and use of mobile phone surveillance equipment by the police forces and the regulatory and oversight regime governing the use of such equipment. This equipment can be referred to using a range of terms, including “Covert Communications Data Capture” (“CCDC”) equipment, “IMSI Catchers”, “IMSI Grabbers”, “Cell site simulators” and “Stingrays”. In these grounds, this equipment is hereafter referred to as “IMSI Catchers”. Privacy International’s initial request to the Staffordshire PCC is annexed to these grounds as Exhibit A. 3. On 15 December 2017, Privacy International submitted grounds of appeal to the Commissioner, following the Staffordshire PCC’s failure to respond to the initial request for information. Those grounds are annexed to these grounds as Exhibit B. 4. On 8 January 2018, the Commissioner issued a decision notice finding that the Staffordshire PCC had breached sections 1(1) and 10(1) of the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) 2000 by failing “to provide a valid response to the request within 20 working days.” The Commissioner further directed the Staffordshire PCC “to comply with the request or to issue a valid refusal notice as set out in section 17” within 35 calendar days of the decision notice. -
South Yorkshire Violence Reduction Unit Information for Partners
South Yorkshire Violence Reduction Unit article for partner websites and intranet The South Yorkshire Violence Reduction Unit is based at Shepcote Lane in Sheffield and is working across South Yorkshire to prevent and reduce violence. In South Yorkshire, we are taking a public health approach to preventing and reducing violence. This means that we look at the causes of violence, working in partnership to stop violence before it starts, halt the progression of violence once it has already begun and provide ways out for people already entrenched in violent behaviour. The following animation explains the public health approach to violence. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZOEnCd6uiI&t=22s The South Yorkshire Violence Reduction Unit partnership is led by Dr Alan Billings, South Yorkshire Police and Crime Commissioner and consists of: • Office of the South Yorkshire Police and Crime Commissioner • South Yorkshire Police • Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council • Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council • Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council • Sheffield City Council • Public Health England • Barnsley Clinical Commissioning Group • Doncaster Clinical Commissioning Group • Rotherham Clinical Commissioning Group • Sheffield Clinical Commissioning Group • National Probation Service • Community Rehabilitation Company • Department for Work and Pensions • Youth Offending Teams • Education sector representatives • Community, Faith and Voluntary sector representatives All partners are clear that community voices and ideas are central to preventing and reducing violence in South Yorkshire. We have voluntary and community sector representatives from across the four districts (Barnsley, Doncaster, Rotherham and Sheffield) working together and sitting on our Violence Reduction Executive Board. In addition to this, we want to ensure that we hear the voice of community members who are not often given the opportunity to be involved in processes from the very beginning. -
Lincolnshire. Lincoln
DIRECTORY .J LINCOLNSHIRE. LINCOLN. 3~7 Mason Col. Ed.ward Snow D.L. 20 Minster yard, L!nooln Stovin George, Boothby, Lincoln Morton Wm. Henry esq. Washingborough manor, Lincoln Usher A. H. Wickenby Pea~s John esq. Mere~ Lincoln Warrener Col. John Matthew, Long Leys, Yarborough N_ev1le Edward Horaho esq. Skellingthorpe, Lincoln I road, Lincoln Sibt:horp )!ontague Richard Waldo esq. Oanwick hall, Wright Philip Chetwood J.P. Brattleby hall, Linculn Lmcoln Wright G. Gate Burton S~uttleworth_Alfred esq. D.L. Eastgate house, Lincoln The Mayor, Sheriff, Aldermen & Town Clerk of Lincoln Sibthorp C~nmgsby Charles esq. M.A., D.L. Sudbrooke 1 Clerk, William Barr Danby, 2 Bank street :S:olme, Lmcoln Surveyor, James Thropp M.I.C.E. 29 Broadgate, Lincoln Sm1th Eust~e Abcl esq. ~ong hills, Branston, Lincoln Bailiff & Collector, John Lnmley Bayner, 13 Bank street Tempest MaJor Arthur Cecil, Coleby hall, Lincoln Tempest Roger Stephen esq. Coleby hall, Lincoln PUBLIC ESTABLISHMENTS. Wray Cecil Henry esq. Swinderby, Linooln Aflboretum, Monks road, Gentle Smith, manager The Chairmen, for the time being, of the Bracebridge Butter Market, High street Urban & Branston Rural District Councils are ex-officio Cattle Markets, Monks road, James Hill, collector of tolls magistrates Church House & Institute, Christ's Hospital terrace, Steep Clerk to the Magistrates, Reginald Arthur Stephen, hill, Rt. Rev. the Lord Bishop of Lincoln, president; Sslterga>te, Lincoln R. C. Hallowes esq. treasurer; Rev. Canon E. T. Leeke Petty Sessions are held at the Justice's room, Lincoln &i R. ~-. MacBrair esq. hun. secs.; Charles W. Martin, orgamzmg sec Castle, the Ist & 3rd friday in every month at I 1.30 City Fire Brigade Engine House, Free School lane, John a.m. -
18 Grantham Road, Bracebridge Heath, Lincoln
Retail unit suitable for a variety of uses, Close to Tesco, Lincolnshire Co-op Food Store, subject to planning Pharmacy and Post Office 42.48 sq m (457 sq ft) Available on new lease Located along a busy parade of shops in TO LET 18 GRANTHAM ROAD, BRACEBRIDGE HEATH, prominent roadside location LINCOLN, LN4 2LD LOCATION RATES The property forms part of a busy parade of Charging Authority: North Kesteven District Council commercial properties in Bracebridge Heath and is Description: Shop and Premises situated in a prominent position in the centre of the Rateable value: £5,200 village 2.5 miles south of Lincoln city centre on the UBR: 0.493 A607 Grantham Road, close to the A15 junction. Period: 2018-2019 Lincolnshire Co-op Food Store is located along the Multiplying the Rateable Value figure with the UBR same parade of shops, together with a pharmacy multiplier gives the annual rates payable, excluding and Post Office. A good mix of traders also occupy any transitional arrangements which may be nearby units including Tesco Convenience, a fish applicable. For further information, please contact and chip shop and two public houses. the Charging Authority. PROPERTY An ingoing tenant may be able to apply for Small Business Rates Relief. We would encourage any A terraced retail unit laid out over ground floor level interested parties to make their own enquiries with with a glazed shop front. North Kesteven District Council. There are 2 allocated car parking spaces, with ample TENURE customer car parking to the rear of the property. The property is available for a minimum term of 5 ACCOMMODATION years, or multiples thereof. -
Looking for Value in Hard Times How a New Approach to Priority Setting Can Help Improve Patient Care While Making Savings
Learning report: Looking for value in hard times How a new approach to priority setting can help improve patient care while making savings August 2012 Identify Innovate Demonstrate Encourage © 2012 The Health Foundation Learning report: Looking for value in hard times is published by the Health Foundation, 90 Long Acre, London WC2E 9RA ISBN: 978-1-906461-42-3 Contents Commentary 2 1 Introduction 3 Context 4 2 What is Star? 6 A socio-technical approach to resource allocation 6 How Star works 8 3 The Star project in Sheffield 10 Background 10 Introducing Star in Sheffield 11 The Sheffield decision conference 12 What was the impact? 17 Lessons learned 19 4 Next steps 20 LOOKING FOR VALUE IN HARD TIMES 1 Commentary The NHS is under greater pressure than ever It soon became clear that something of real to secure high-quality, value-for-money health practical value was emerging and we are services. At the same time, commissioners therefore delighted that this methodological and providers are expected to involve research has been applied in practice. stakeholders – including patients and the public – in decisions. As this report shows, by using the Star approach, NHS Sheffield were able to agree As clinical commissioning groups in England changes to their eating disorder services begin to take on their new responsibilities, with clinicians, service users and other they will need tools that help them meet stakeholders. The changes they have made are these demands – and which enable them to expected to improve both patient care and demonstrate that they have done so. -
New Electoral Arrangements for North Kesteven District Council Final Recommendations January 2021
New electoral arrangements for North Kesteven District Council Final Recommendations January 2021 Translations and other formats: To get this report in another language or in a large-print or Braille version, please contact the Local Government Boundary Commission for England at: Tel: 0330 500 1525 Email: [email protected] Licensing: The mapping in this report is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Keeper of Public Records © Crown copyright and database right. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and database right. Licence Number: GD 100049926 2021 A note on our mapping: The maps shown in this report are for illustrative purposes only. Whilst best efforts have been made by our staff to ensure that the maps included in this report are representative of the boundaries described by the text, there may be slight variations between these maps and the large PDF map that accompanies this report, or the digital mapping supplied on our consultation portal. This is due to the way in which the final mapped products are produced. The reader should therefore refer to either the large PDF supplied with this report or the digital mapping for the true likeness of the boundaries intended. The boundaries as shown on either the large PDF map or the digital mapping should always appear identical. Contents Introduction 1 Who we are and what we do 1 What is an electoral review? 1 Why North Kesteven? 2 Our proposals for North Kesteven 2 How will the recommendations affect you? 2 Review -
Changes in the Ethnic Diversity of the Christian Population in England
National Census 2001 and 2011 Changes in the Ethnic Diversity of the Christian Population in England between 2001 and 2011 East Midlands Region Council for Christian Unity 2014 CONTENTS Foreword from the Chair of the Council for Christian Unity Page 1 Summary and Headlines Page 2 Introduction Page 2 Christian Ethnicity - Comparison of 2001 and 2011 Census Data Page 5 In England Page 5 By region Page 8 Overall trends Page 24 Analysis of Regional data by local authority Page 27 Introduction Page 27 Tables and Figures Page 28 Annex 2 Muslim Ethnicity in England Page 52 Census 2001/2011 East Midlands CCU(14)C3 Changes in the Ethnic Diversity of the Christian Population in England between 2001 and 2011 Foreword from the Chair of the Council for Christian Unity There are great ecumenical, evangelistic, pastoral and missional challenges presented to all the Churches by the increasing diversity of Christianity in England. The comparison of Census data from 2001 and 2011about the ethnic diversity of the Christian population, which is set out in this report, is one element of the work the Council for Christian Unity is doing with a variety of partners in this area. We are very pleased to be working with the Research and Statistics Department and the Committee for Minority Ethnic Anglican Affairs at Church House, and with Churches Together in England on a number of fronts. We hope that the set of eight reports, for each of the eight regions of England, will be a helpful resource for Church Leaders, Dioceses, Districts and Synods, Intermediate Ecumenical Bodies and local churches. -
Nottinghamshire and Nottingham Waste Core Strategyintroduction
Non technical summary............................................................... 3 Introduction to Sustainability Appraisal.........................................................3 The Scoping Report .....................................................................................3 Key findings of this Scoping Report..............................................................4 Proposed Sustainability Appraisal objectives ...............................................4 What happens next? ....................................................................................5 1. Introduction – What is Sustainability Appraisal?.................. 6 The relationship between Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment..........................................................................7 Other appraisals ...........................................................................................7 What is the purpose of SA?..........................................................................7 Purpose of the SA Scoping Report...............................................................8 Further information .......................................................................................9 2. Methodology ........................................................................... 10 Carrying out SA..........................................................................................10 The Nottinghamshire Partnership Approach to SA.....................................10 Independent assessment ...........................................................................11 -
May Patient Experiences 2017 Healthwatch Hub Healthwatch Lincolnshire
6/16/2017 May Patient Experiences 2017 Healthwatch Hub Healthwatch Lincolnshire Healthwatch Lincolnshire Unit 12 1-2 North End Swineshead BOSTON Lincolnshire PE20 3LR May Patient Experiences 2017 This report has been produced by Healthwatch Lincolnshire to highlight the patient, carer and service user health and care experiences shared with us for the period 1 to 31 May 2017. During this period we received a total number of 151 experiences, 53 of these have been posted directly to our feedback centre (to read individual comments regarding individual providers please visit www.healthwatchlincolnshire.co.uk and select relevant provider details), with the remaining 98 being contained in this report. Healthwatch Lincolnshire has consistently over the past 3 years reported concerns raised with us by patients about length of waits to get an appointment with their GP. In May we have again received a number of comments on this subject but the situation appears to be getting worse, 2 examples of the experiences we have received (from di䬁erent areas of the county) are: Patient went to see if they could get an appointment with GP at 7.30am there were 7 people in front of the patient and 40 people behind. Patient did not get an appointment, they wanted some advice about their condition. Couldn't see GP so went to Urgent Care at Skegness Hospital instead to see if they could give advice. Patient experienced trying to make an appointment with their GP very di쬅cult. Called at one point 186 times to make an appointment, when reception answered no immediate appointment available. -
RCPCH Membership Data East of England Area
700 600 Consultant 500 ST1 - 4 + Fys 400 ST5 - 8 + staff grade 300 Retired 200 Medical student 100 Academic 0 GP Age Position Leicester Royal Infirmary Queen's Medical Centre Addenbrookes Hospital Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital Lister Hospital Luton and Dunstable Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Queen's Hospital Nottingham City Hospital Peterborough City Hospital Watford General Hospital Northampton General Hospital Royal Derby Hospital Location with most members Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust All locations Princess Alexandra Hospital Lincoln County Hospital Luton & Dunstable Hospital Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust Southend University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Broomfield Hospital Colchester General Hospital University Hospitals Of Leicester NHS Trust The Queen Elizabeth Hospital Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Derbyshire Children's Hospital West Suffolk Hospital NHS Trust Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust Pilgrim Hospital University of Cambridge Kings Mill Hospital University of Nottingham Hinchingbrooke Hospital Kettering General Hospital Southend Hospital University of Leicester Barking, Havering and Redbridge Hospitals NHS Trust Glenfield Hospital Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Ipswich Hospital Queen Elizabeth II Hospital West Suffolk Hospital Chesterfield Royal Hospital Queen's Hospital Basildon Hospital Bedford Hospital Ipswich Hospital NHS -
Nottingham University
Case Study Nottingham High-quality infrastructure is an essential component of a modern and successful university. This is not University only achieved by providing an attractive environment in which to work and study. It is also important to maintain leading-edge technology. AEOS fits perfectly in this picture. AEOS can operate different buildings from one central point. The University of Nottingham is renowned for its research innovations. Its system to control access and to secure the facilities no longer reflected its commitment to excellence in the advancement of technology. Over the years, the University acquired several systems for access control, each with their own card technology. Additionally, it had various platforms for its daily operations. Not only was maintaining all these different systems and technologies time-consuming, expensive and complex. It also limited a possible system expansion. Most of all, there was no clear overview of who was authorized to enter the premises and who was not. Time for change! Security Management Facts at a glance 5 Faculties 4 main sites in the UK 2 campuses in Malaysia and China 40,000 students and employees Time for change Rule Engine The University decided that it needed to do The University also concluded to have the extra two things: switch to one single access control AEOS open architecture AEOS functionality Rule Engine. This functionality platform, upgrade the card system and revert to uses predefined rules and data fields that using one single card in the whole University. allows the use of both represent a certain authorization (access level). The reason to go for Nedap’s security system existing and new The Rule Engine checks the rules and data fields AEOS was that it provides all the functionalities against one’s profile and if they match, that person that the University was looking for.