DOCSLIB.ORG

Nottinghamshire and Nottingham Waste Core Strategyintroduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nottinghamshire and Nottingham Waste Core Strategyintroduction Non technical summary............................................................... 3 Introduction to Sustainability Appraisal.........................................................3 The Scoping Report .....................................................................................3 Key findings of this Scoping Report..............................................................4 Proposed Sustainability Appraisal objectives ...............................................4 What happens next? ....................................................................................5 1. Introduction – What is Sustainability Appraisal?.................. 6 The relationship between Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment..........................................................................7 Other appraisals ...........................................................................................7 What is the purpose of SA?..........................................................................7 Purpose of the SA Scoping Report...............................................................8 Further information .......................................................................................9 2. Methodology ........................................................................... 10 Carrying out SA..........................................................................................10 The Nottinghamshire Partnership Approach to SA.....................................10 Independent assessment ...........................................................................11 Key findings and draft SA objectives ..........................................................11 Limitations of the SA process.....................................................................11 Future Timetable ........................................................................................11 Map of the area covered by this scoping report..........................................12 3. Other relevant Plans, Policies, and Programmes................ 13 Introduction.................................................................................................13 4. Baseline information and characteristics of Nottinghamshire......................................................................... 24 Introduction.................................................................................................24 Key characteristics of Nottinghamshire ......................................................24 5. Sustainability issues.............................................................. 33 6. Developing our sustainability objectives (the SA Framework) ................................................................................. 43 Introduction.................................................................................................43 Table X Proposed sustainability objectives ................................................44 1 Table X: Proposed SA Objectives, decision making criteria and proposed indicators....................................................................................................45 Testing the plan objectives ....................................................... 51 Table X Relationship between SA objectives and SA themes....................51 Table X Internal compatibility of the SA objectives.....................................52 Relationship between SEA topics and SA objectives .................................53 Internal compatibility sustainability appraisal objectives.... Error! Bookmark not defined. What happens next? .................................................................. 53 This Scoping Report has been prepared to cover all of the planning policy documents that will make up the Nottinghamshire Minerals and Waste Development Framework. It sets out the key issues and baseline information/evidence that will be used to help assess the impacts of our future policies and plans. 2 Non technical summary Introduction to Sustainability Appraisal The Sustainability Appraisal (SA) process is a way of ensuring that all plans and programmes which relate to land use issues are compatible with the aims of sustainable development. This includes all of the documents that will make up the Minerals and Waste Development Framework. The first documents to go through this process will be the Minerals Core Strategy and the Waste Core Strategy. As they develop they will be tested against an agreed set of sustainability objectives. These objectives are defined during the early stages of the process and set the framework for assessing the emerging plan documents and also monitoring their effectiveness. By going through this process, we can ensure that each plan document contributes towards the overall development of Nottinghamshire and does not conflict with the aims of other strategies and programmes that are intended to enhance our social, environmental and economic well being. SA is an ongoing, iterative process. The initial information gathering stage helps to establish significant issues that need to be addressed by the emerging documents. The appraisal process then helps to refine these issues and options into a set of realistic, preferred options that have been assessed thoroughly. The key features of the sustainability process are therefore to: Collect baseline information and identify significant issues or trends; Predict the effects of the plan; Identify possible policy options; Consult others on the plan policies; Monitor the effects of the plan policies. The Scoping Report This scoping report is the first stage in the appraisal process and sets out the baseline data that has been complied as part of the information gathering phase. The report also considers relevant plans and programmes that may influence the Minerals and Waste plan documents or be affected by their policies. Having identified significant issues that should be addressed, the report then seeks to establish a suitable framework of sustainability objectives against which the proposed policies should be assessed. The purpose of this report is therefore to decide on the scope and level of detail for the SA. The information and findings set out here are not final as the report is intended to involve other interested parties in the appraisal process and to identify any gaps in what is covered. In some cases the data may simply not exist, in which case, this will be noted along with proposals to overcome this when the next appraisal is carried out. 3 Key findings of this Scoping Report [INSERT SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS HERE FOLLOWING CONSULTATION WITH STATUTORY CONSULTEES] Taking a spatial approach Although the issues highlight above have been grouped broadly into three themes, many of the issues highlighted above are inter-linked and should not be considered in isolation. One of the features of the spatial planning system is to look at the wider context and how different issues relate to each other. The minerals and waste documents will need to ensure that they provide an appropriate basis to identify adequate mineral resources/waste treatment to meet local and national need. It will therefore need to identify suitable locations for mineral extraction and waste treatment or disposal provide sufficient capacity whilst at the same time ensuring these are the most socially and environmentally acceptable. Proposed Sustainability Appraisal objectives A range of draft SA objectives have been developed that take into account all the factors identified through the review of plans, policies, baseline data and key sustainability issues identified for Nottinghamshire. These SA objectives will then be used to focus further work in future SA documents. Proposed SA objectives 1. Ensure adequate supply of minerals is provided to meet local and national needs. 2. Ensure an adequate network of suitable waste management sites for the safe treatment and disposal of waste. 3. Protect and enhance biodiversity at all levels. 4. Reduce the impact of transporting minerals and waste (and promote more sustainable forms of transport and use of existing transport infrastructure.) 5. Protect the quality of the historic environment above and below ground. 6. Protect and enhance the quality and character of our townscape and landscape. 7.Minimise impact and risk of flooding from mineral and waste related activities 4 8. Minimise emissions of greenhouse gasses from minerals and waste activities and increase adaptability to climate change. 9. Protect soil quality 10.Protection of high quality agricultural land 11. Promote sustainable use of minerals and manage waste according to the waste hierarchy. 12. Promote energy efficiency and maximise renewable energy opportunities from new or existing development. 13. Minimise impact of minerals and waste activities on local air quality. 14. Limit the impact of minerals and waste activities on water quality. 15. Encourage greater community involvement in the planning process. 16. Support wider economic development through provision of raw materials and waste infrastructure and related job opportunities. 17. Minimise impact of minerals and waste activity on human health and quality of life. 18. Maximise the reuse of previously developed land and buildings. What happens next? The scoping report provides an early opportunity for interested parties to comment, and ensure that the final SA report is robust enough to achieve its sustainable development objectives when appraising the MWDF. Copies
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Changes in the Ethnic Diversity of the Christian Population in England
    National Census 2001 and 2011 Changes in the Ethnic Diversity of the Christian Population in England between 2001 and 2011 East Midlands Region Council for Christian Unity 2014 CONTENTS Foreword from the Chair of the Council for Christian Unity Page 1 Summary and Headlines Page 2 Introduction Page 2 Christian Ethnicity - Comparison of 2001 and 2011 Census Data Page 5 In England Page 5 By region Page 8 Overall trends Page 24 Analysis of Regional data by local authority Page 27 Introduction Page 27 Tables and Figures Page 28 Annex 2 Muslim Ethnicity in England Page 52 Census 2001/2011 East Midlands CCU(14)C3 Changes in the Ethnic Diversity of the Christian Population in England between 2001 and 2011 Foreword from the Chair of the Council for Christian Unity There are great ecumenical, evangelistic, pastoral and missional challenges presented to all the Churches by the increasing diversity of Christianity in England. The comparison of Census data from 2001 and 2011about the ethnic diversity of the Christian population, which is set out in this report, is one element of the work the Council for Christian Unity is doing with a variety of partners in this area. We are very pleased to be working with the Research and Statistics Department and the Committee for Minority Ethnic Anglican Affairs at Church House, and with Churches Together in England on a number of fronts. We hope that the set of eight reports, for each of the eight regions of England, will be a helpful resource for Church Leaders, Dioceses, Districts and Synods, Intermediate Ecumenical Bodies and local churches.
    [Show full text]
  • Choosing Your Hospital
    Choosing your hospital Lincolnshire Primary Care Trust For most medical conditions, you can now choose where and when to have your treatment. This booklet explains more about choosing your hospital. You will also find information about the hospitals you can choose from. Second edition December 2006 Contents What is patient choice? 1 Making your choice 2 How to use this booklet 3 Where can I have my treatment? 4 Your hospitals A to Z 7 Your questions answered 33 How to book your appointment 35 What do the specialty names mean? 36 What does the healthcare jargon mean? 38 Where can I find more information and support? 40 How do your hospitals score? 41 Hospital score table 46 What is patient choice? If you and your GP decide that you need to see a specialist for more treatment, you can now choose where and when to have your treatment from a list of hospitals or clinics. Why has patient choice been introduced? Research has shown that patients want to be more involved in making decisions and choosing their healthcare. Most of the patients who are offered a choice of hospital consider the experience to be positive and valuable. The NHS is changing to give you more choice and flexibility in how you are treated. Your choices Your local choices are included in this booklet. If you do not want to receive your treatment at a local hospital, your GP will be able to tell you about your choices of other hospitals across England. As well as the hospitals listed in this booklet, your GP may be able to suggest community-based services, such as GPs with Special Interests or community clinics.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper C – Appendix 2 – Humber Labour Market Report
    HUMBER LOCAL ENTERPRISE PARTNERSHIP LABOUR MARKET UPDATE August 2020 Humber LEP . Population 932,800 information . Working age population 563,400 (60.4% of the population) Employment % in Employment 75.3% and % Unemployed 4.8% Unemployment Rates (Apr 19- Note: time lag due to data from ONS annual population survey Jan-Dec19 Mar 20) Claimant Count - . 39,400 claiming Universal Credit and/or Jobseeker’s July 2020 Allowance. An increase of 720 on last month (Out-Of-Work . An increase of 17,000 (+76%) since March 20 Benefits) . *The claimant count is 7% of the working age population. (Y&H 6.7 % GB 6.5 %) *Note: % is number of claimants as a proportion of resident population of the same age Humber LEP Claimant Count 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 July 2013 July 2014 July 2015 July 2016 July 2017 July 2018 July 2019 July 2020 July April 2013 April 2014 April 2015 April 2016 April 2017 April 2018 April 2019 April 2020 April January 2017 January January 2013 January 2014 January 2015 January 2016 January 2018 January 2019 January 2020 October 2014 October 2015 October 2016 October 2017 October 2018 October 2019 October 2013 Age Number Actual change % change on on last month last month Claimant count 18 - 24 8,035 115 +1% by age 25 - 49 21,905 305 +1% 50+ 9,280 295 +3% The Claimant Count Dataset measures the number of people claiming Jobseeker's Allowance plus those who claim Universal Credit who are out of work.
    [Show full text]
  • STP: Latest Position Developing and Delivering the Humber, Coast and Vale Sustainability and Transformation Plan July 2016 Who’S Involved?
    STP: Latest position Developing and delivering the Humber, Coast and Vale Sustainability and Transformation Plan July 2016 Who’s involved? NHS Commissioners Providers Local Authorities East Riding of Yorkshire CCG Humber NHS Foundation Trust City of York Council Hull CCG North Lincolnshire and Goole East Riding of Yorkshire Council NHS Foundation Trust Hull City Council North Lincolnshire CCG Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys North East Lincolnshire CCG NHS Foundation Trust North Lincolnshire Council City Health Care Partnerships North East Lincolnshire Council Scarborough and Ryedale CCG CIC Vale of York CCG Hull and East Yorkshire North Yorkshire County Council Hospitals NHS Trust Navigo Rotherham, Doncaster and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Our footprint Population characteristics 1.4 million population 23% live in the most deprived areas of England Diverse rural, urban and coastal communities Huge variation in health outcomes Three main acute providers Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust North Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Drivers for change • Financial pressures across the system – significant and growing financial deficit across the system, doing nothing is not an option • Average life expectancies across the footprint range widely • Smoking, child and adult obesity rates and excessive alcohol consumption are above (some significantly) national averages • Stroke – our premature mortality rates from stroke are higher than average
    [Show full text]
  • Map 15 Lincolnshire and the Wash, 100-Km Grid Square TF (Axis Numbers Are the Coordinates of the National Grid) © Crown Copyright
    Immingham Scunthorpe Grimsby Brigg NORTH EAST LINCOLNSHIRE Cleethorpes Waltham Caistor Tetney 0 0 4 Market Rasen Louth WEST LINDSEY Mablethorpe Ingham Withern 0 8 3 Lincoln EAST LINDSEY Washingborough Horncastle Ingoldmells Spilsby Waddington Skegness 0 6 3 Coningsby Stickney NORTH KESTEVEN Wrangle Sleaford Boston Holkham Hunstanton 0 BOSTON 4 3 Grantham Horbling Dersingham Fakenham Pinchbeck Holbeach Harpley SOUTH KESTEVEN Spalding SOUTH HOLLAND 0 Bourne King's Lynn 2 3 Dereham Market Deeping Wisbech KING'S LYNN AND WEST NORFOLK Swaffham Stamford RUTLAND Hethersett Downham Market Wymondham 0 CITY OF PETERBOROUGH BRECKLAND 0 3 Peterborough March Attleborough Yaxley Feltwell Oundle CORBY Littleport Brandon Ramsey Chatteris Sawtry EAST NORTHAMPTONSHIRE Thetford 500 520 540 560 580 600 The shading indicates the maximum requirements for radon protective measures in any location within each 1-km grid square to satisfy the guidance in Building Regulations Approved Document C. The requirement for an existing building with a valid postal address can be obtained for a small charge from www.ukradon.org. The requirement for a site without a postal address is available through the British Geological Survey GeoReports service, http://shop.bgs.ac.uk/GeoReports/. Level of protection required Settlements Roads National Grid None Lincoln Motorways 100-km 10-km Basic Primary Roads Other Features Spalding Full A Roads LOCAL ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT Holbeach B Roads Water features Spilsby Map 15 Lincolnshire and the Wash, 100-km grid square TF (axis numbers are the coordinates of the National Grid) © Crown copyright. All rights reserved [Health Protection Agency][100016969][2007] Radon potential classification © Health Protection Agency and British Geological Survey copyright [2007].
    [Show full text]
  • North East Lincolnshire Care Trust Plus 2012-13 Annual Report and Accounts
    North East Lincolnshire Care Trust Plus 2012-13 Annual Report and Accounts You may re-use the text of this document (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ © Crown copyright Published to gov.uk, in PDF format only. www.gov.uk/dh 2 North East Lincolnshire Care Trust Plus 2012-13 Annual Report 3 Annual Report 2012/2013 for North East Lincolnshire Care Trust Plus Welcome from the Chair and Chief Executive 3 Contents Information from the Chair of the CCG 4 Preparing for an Emergency 5 Compliance with Pension Scheme Regulations 5 Sustainability 5 A Review of our Performance 6 Service Performance 7 Information Governance 9 Principles for Remedy 9 Access to information 9 Humber Cluster Board 10 Board and Financial Statements 11 CCG Committee Roles 12 Declaration of Interests CCG Members 13 Salaries and Allowances for Senior Employees 14 Remuneration Report 2012/13 14 Salaries and Allowances for Senior Employees 15 Table Remuneration Ratios 16 Pension Benefits 17 Statement of designated signing officers Responsibilities 18 Governance Statement 18 Cash Equivalent Transfer Values (CETV) 19 Real Increase in CETV 19 Financial Review 20 Director of Finance 21 Audit Costs 22 Statement in Respect of Disabled Employees 23 Equality Statement 23 2 Welcome to the Annual Report of This year has been one of fast-paced The continued dedication of our NHS North East Lincolnshire for and significant change as we have workforce has ensured that quality is Welcome from worked towards and completed the maintained, necessary savings have 2012/2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Download North East Lincolnshire: Prevalence Of
    MUSCULOSKELETAL CALCULATOR 29,115 estimated people Second Local Authority Bulletin in North East Prevalence of back pain in England Lincolnshire live and North East Lincolnshire with back pain SUMMARY Arthritis Research UK has partnered with Imperial College London to develop the Musculoskeletal Calculator, a prevalence modelling tool for musculoskeletal conditions. Data on the burden of musculoskeletal conditions are lacking and for the first time this prevalence model provides estimates of the burden of back pain to local areas. Key messages Low back pain is the leading cause of disability in the UK. Approximately 1 in 6 adults in England have some form of back pain. There’s variation in the prevalence of back pain across local authority areas in England. The prevalence of back pain can be reduced through tackling obesity 1in6 and improving physical activity. There also appears to be an association people in between smoking and back pain, but this doesn’t seem to be causative. England have The Musculoskeletal Calculator for back pain is the second of four local back pain datasets. The back pain estimates were preceded by estimates for knee and hip osteoarthritis, and will be followed by figures for rheumatoid arthritis and high risk fragility fractures. The Musculoskeletal Calculator is available at arthritisresearchuk.org/mskcalculator BACK PAIN IN ENGLAND Prevalence There’s variation in the prevalence of back pain at local authority level in England as estimated by the MSK Calculator. Approximately 1 in 6 people (16.9%) in England have back pain. This includes people of all ages and 9m all causes of back pain.* The prevalence varies across local authorities in estimated people England, ranging from 11.8% to 21.4%.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress in the Hull and Humber Ports City Region Statistical Update – March 2010
    Progress in the Hull and Humber Ports City Region Statistical Update – March 2010 Introduction Welcome to Progress in the Hull and Humber Ports City Region 2010, produced by Humber Economic Partnership (HEP) on behalf of and with support by Yorkshire Futures. This document provides a statistical update on the performance of the city region and is a light touch review to support work on the Functional Sub-Regional and statutory Local Economic Assessments. It updates the Headline and High Level indicators outlined in the Integrated Regional Framework. There are three Headline Indicators and 35 high-level indicators, against which progress is measured. Data for some of these are unavailable at below regional geographies, so to add value, proxy indicators have been included where possible or appropriate. The cut off point for data collection was January 2010. The IRF indicators were first reported by HEP in the three-year major review Progress in the Hull and Humber Ports City Region 2009, which can be accessed via this link: http://www.humberep.co.uk/pageDocuments.php?section=64&search=2009&searchon=year In keeping with former reports, the chapters are ordered as follows 1. Population and Settlements 2. Economy 3. Quality of Life 4. High Quality Environments 5. Infrastructure 6. Education and Skills 7. Governance and Civic Participation Building on the work undertaken in this, and to complement the forthcoming Functional Sub-Regional and Local Economic Assessments, two new geographies have been reported where possible: the South Bank, covering the areas of North East Lincolnshire and North Lincolnshire, and the North Bank, covering the East Riding of Yorkshire and Kingston upon Hull.
    [Show full text]
  • Q2 1617 LA Referrals
    Referrals to Local Authority Adoption Agencies from First4Adoption by region Q2 July-September 2016 Yorkshire & The Humber LA Adoption Agencies North East LA Adoption Agencies Durham County Council 13 North Yorkshire County Council* 30 1 Northumberland County Council 8 Barnsley Adoption Fostering Unit 11 South Tyneside Council 8 Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council 11 2 North Tyneside Council 5 Bradford Metropolitan Borough Council 10 Redcar Cleveland Borough Council 5 Hull City Council 10 1 Web Referrals Phone Referrals Middlesbrough Council 3 East Riding Of Yorkshire Council 9 City Of Sunderland 2 Cumbria County Council 7 Gateshead Council 2 Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council 6 1 Newcastle Upon Tyne City Council 2 0 3.5 7 10.5 14 Leeds City Council 6 1 Web Referrals Phone Referrals Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council 5 Hartlepool Borough Council 4 North Lincolnshire Adoption Service 4 1 City Of York Council 3 North East Lincolnshire Adoption Service 3 1 Darlington Borough Council 2 Kirklees Metropolitan Council 2 1 Sheffield Metropolitan City Council 2 Wakefield Metropolitan District Council 2 * Denotes agencies with more than one office entry on the agency finder 0 10 20 30 40 North West LA Adoption Agencies Liverpool City Council 30 Cheshire West And Chester County Council 16 Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council 11 1 Manchester City Council 9 WWISH 9 Lancashire County Council 8 Oldham Council 8 1 Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council 8 2 Web Referrals Phone Referrals Wirral Adoption Team 8 Salford City Council 7 3 Bury Metropolitan
    [Show full text]
  • Red1 Responses & Hits by Healthwatch
    Paper D1 Red1 Responses & Hits by Healthwatch 250 216 200 185 169 145 136 132 150 122 118 112 117 94 89 89 100 77 83 66 57 42 45 50 37 6 2 0 Healthwatch Derby Healthwatch Healthwatch Leicester Healthwatch Healthwatch Healthwatch North Healthwatch North Healthwatch Healthwatch Healthwatch Healthwatch Rutland Derbyshire Leicestershire Lincolnshire East Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Northamptonshire Nottingham City Nottinghamshire Red1 Responses Red1 Hits Red1 Performance by Healthwatch 90.00% 100% 80.00% 90% 70.00% 80% 60.00% 70% 60% 50.00% 85.71% 50% 40.00% 77.05% 82.22% 79.46% 73.68% 69.82% 40% 67.42% 67.13% 63.24% 30.00% 61.03% 30% 20.00% 33.33% 20% 10.00% 10% 0.00% 0% Healthwatch Derby Healthwatch Healthwatch Healthwatch Healthwatch Healthwatch North Healthwatch North Healthwatch Healthwatch Healthwatch Healthwatch Rutland Derbyshire Leicester Leicestershire Lincolnshire East Lincolnshire Lincolnshire Northamptonshire Nottingham City Nottinghamshire Red1 Performance Red1 Target Red1 Performance by Healthwatch (By Month) 95.00% 90.00% 85.00% 80.00% 75.00% 70.00% 65.00% 60.00% 55.00% 50.00% 45.00% 40.00% 35.00% 30.00% 25.00% July August September Healthwatch Derby Healthwatch Derbyshire Healthwatch Leicester Healthwatch Leicestershire Healthwatch Lincolnshire Healthwatch North East Lincolnshire Healthwatch North Lincolnshire Healthwatch Northamptonshire Healthwatch Nottingham City Healthwatch Nottinghamshire Healthwatch Rutland Red2 Responses & Hits by Healthwatch 4500 3971 4000 3723 3485 3396 3500 2899 3000 2320 2248 2285 2500 2015 1784
    [Show full text]
  • Humber, Coast and Vale Integrated Care System (ICS) Information Pack June 2021
    Humber, Coast and Vale Integrated Care System (ICS) Information Pack June 2021 NHS England and NHS Improvement Overview and Contents This information pack: - Gives a basic overview of the Integrated Care System (ICS); - Lists the Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs), Local Authorities (LAs) and NHS Trusts that operate in the ICS; - Provides basic maps of the ICS’s CCG and LA areas and boundaries; - Gives an overview of the wider North East and Yorkshire region and its 4 ICSs. CONTENTS PAGE CCG Area Information 3 Maps 4 CCG and Local Authority Information 5 NHS Trust Information 6 North East and Yorkshire Regional Information 7-13 ABBREVIATIONS NORTH EAST AND YORKSHIRE ICSs ICS Integrated Care System HCV Humber, Coast and Vale CCG Clinical Commissioning Group WY West Yorkshire LA Local Authority SYB South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw PCN Primary Care Network NENC North East and North Cumbria Please Note: All best efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained within this pack at the time of its creation. Humber, Coast and Vale ICS CCG Area Information PRIMARY CARE CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP POPULATION NETWORKS LOCAL AUTHORITIES * NHS TRUSTS AMBULANCE SERVICE (PCNs) Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Humber Teaching NHS Foundation Trust East Riding of Yorkshire CCG 341,173 7 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust York and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Hull CCG 259,778 5 Hull City Council Humber
    [Show full text]
  • Car Ownership Rates Per Local Authority in England and Wales
    Car ownership rates per local authority in England and Wales Source: 2001 Census and 2011 Census Date: 26th December 2012 % of % of Cars/vans % households % households % per 1000 change with change with 4+ change people since car/van since cars/vans since Rank Local Authority (2011) 2001 (2011) 2001 (2011) 2001 1 East Dorset 694 9 89.7 1.4 4.4 48 2 South Northamptonshire 685 9.6 90.7 2.8 4.4 47 3 Stratford-on-Avon 674 6.6 87.2 1.0 4.2 39 4 Cotswold 670 8.7 87.4 1.7 3.8 37 5 Maldon 669 8.5 87.4 1.4 4.7 29 6 Hart 667 3.7 92 0.9 4.5 24 7 South Bucks 666 3 89.8 1.0 5.3 31 8 Malvern Hills 665 10.5 86.5 1.7 4.2 47 9 East Hampshire 664 8.7 88.8 1.3 4.6 46 10 Uttlesford 663 4.6 89.9 2.4 5.1 29 11 Mid Suffolk 661 10.1 88.7 2.1 4.1 43 13 Wychavon 660 8.6 87.1 1.8 4.2 45 12 Wealden 660 7.9 87.6 2.0 4.4 46 14 Mole Valley 657 3.4 87.7 0.9 4.2 22 15 Surrey Heath 654 1.6 90 0.5 4.6 26 16 South Hams 653 14 86.7 2.1 3.4 67 17 Horsham 653 5.5 88.2 0.7 4.0 32 18 New Forest 650 9.2 86.7 1.1 3.6 44 19 Chiltern 649 3.7 89.1 1.1 4.2 19 21 Daventry 646 8.5 88 1.8 4.1 48 20 Stroud 646 10.7 86.1 2.8 3.8 45 22 South Norfolk 643 8.7 88.3 2.0 3.3 39 23 Eden 642 11.3 86.1 1.7 3.3 38 24 Wokingham 642 5 91 0.3 3.7 24 25 Bromsgrove 641 8.1 87.5 1.0 3.8 35 26 Harborough 641 6.6 88.2 0.9 3.5 40 27 Waverley 640 4.4 88.1 2.1 4.0 27 29 Derbyshire Dales 635 11.9 85.2 2.4 3.5 62 28 Babergh 635 8.4 85.9 2.0 3.6 33 29 South Oxfordshire 635 4.7 88.4 1.3 4.1 47 31 Powys 635 14.9 85 3.0 3.6 80 33 Forest of Dean 634 11.3 85.6 2.2 4.0 47 32 North Dorset 634 11.9 88 2.4 3.6 51 36 West
    [Show full text]