Management & Conservation of Crayfish

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Management & Conservation of Crayfish ManagementManagement && ConservationConservation ofof CrayfishCrayfish Proceedings of a conference held on 7th November 2002 at the Nottingham Forest Football Club, Nottingham, UK. www.environment-agency.gov.uk The Environment Agency is the leading public body protecting and improving the environment in England and Wales. It’s our job to make sure that air, land and water are looked after by everyone in today’s society, so that tomorrow’s generations inherit a cleaner, healthier world. Our work includes tackling flooding and pollution incidents, reducing industry’s impacts on the environment, cleaning up rivers, coastal waters and contaminated land, and improving wildlife habitats. These proceedings were produced under Environment Agency R&D Project W1-070 Published by: Environment Agency Rio House Waterside Drive, Aztec West Almondsbury, Bristol BS32 4UD Tel: 01454 624400 Fax: 01454 624409 ISBN : 1844321584 © Environment Agency July 2003 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. This report is printed on Cyclus Print, a 100% recycled stock, which is 100% post consumer waste and is totally chlorine free. Water used is treated and in most cases returned to source in better condition than removed. Front cover illustration by Jeanette Sibley Management & Conservation of Crayfish Proceedings of a conference held on 7th November 2002 at the Nottingham Forest Football Club, Nottingham, UK Edited by David M. Holdich (EMEC Ecology) & Peter J. Sibley (Environment Agency) May 2003 Supported by: Environment Agency British Waterways English Nature Institute of Fisheries Management International Association of Astacology This publication should be cited as: Holdich, D. M. & Sibley, P. J. (eds) (2003). Management & Conservation of Crayfish. Proceedings of a conference held on 7th November, 2002. Environment Agency, Bristol. 217 pp. ii Editorial This conference was a follow up to the one held in Leeds in 2000 and is a testament to the continued interest in both indigenous (native) and non-indigenous (alien) crayfish in the British Isles. Over 120 delegates attended from a wide range of organisations, as far a field as Germany, the Czech Republic and Croatia, and a further 40 had to be disappointed due to space considerations. A large number of high quality posters were presented and kept delegates occupied during tea breaks and over lunch. The conference dinner, held the night before at the Lobster Pot Restaurant, was a great success, and many shellfish, including crayfish, were consumed. On the day of the conference Peter Sibley made the opening and closing remarks and acted as Master of Ceremonies. A wide range of papers were presented and David Holdich, David Fraser, Jonathan Brickland and Richard Jennings chaired the four sessions respectively. The edited proceedings include the majority of papers presented at the conference, as well as some of the posters, and an additional one on legislation. The editors considered this to be an important topic and, as a number of issues were raised during the discussions, it was decided to include a review of current and planned legislation. Also included are a distribution update for mainland Britain and a bibliography of biological and ecological studies on crayfish in the British Isles. Some short communications have been included within the main body of the volume as they were thought to add weight to the views on management and conservation of the indigenous white-clawed crayfish. Organising committee: Peter Sibley (Environment Agency) Jonathan Brickland (British Waterways) David Holdich (International Association of Astacology) Richard Jennings (Environment Agency) Julie Bywater (Environment Agency) David Fraser (English Nature) Acknowledgements - the editors would like to thank: The list of reviewers below and the rest of the organising committee for their help. Jim Lyons, Pete Sibley and David Holdich for taking the conference photographs. Lianne Pegrum, Lesley Rippon, Lisa Roberts and Belinda Steward of the Environment Agency for their assistance with the smooth running of the conference. Jeanette Sibley for the conference painting and the colour plate on the title page. The children of Class 1 (2001/2), Flintham Primary School, Notts for the crayfish drawings. Nottingham Forest Football Club for providing the facilities and looking after us on the day. Alastair Picken, Pam Mardon, Phil Harding and Helen Watkinson for their help with publishing these proceedings. i List of reviewers All papers submitted to the editors were reviewed by at least two persons. Ben Le Bas (English Nature) Paul Bradley (Sheffield University) Jonathan Brickland (British Waterways) David Fraser (English Nature) Nigel Hewlett (Environment Agency) David Holdich (EMEC Ecology) Adrian Hutchings (Sparsholt College) Richard Jennings (Environment Agency) Paul Lidgett (Environment Agency) Jim Lyons (Environment Agency) Stephanie Peay (Scott Wilson Ltd) Julian Reynolds (University of Dublin) David Rogers (David Rogers Associates) Peter Sibley (Environment Agency) Fred Slater (Cardiff University) Joanne Spink (Environment Agency) Jeama Stanton (Leicester University) Paul Stebbing (University of Newcastle) List of delegates Vicky Armitage Environment Agency (North East Region) Liz Baldwin University of Manchester Trina Barrett Barrett Environmental Consultancy Andy Beal University of Leicester Jonathan Blowers English Nature (Mercia) Paul Bradley University of Sheffield Peter Bradshaw Gloucester Wildlife Trust Thomas Breithaupt University of Hull Jonathan Brickland British Waterways Damian Bubb University of Durham Gail Butterill Cheshire Wildlife Trust Julie Bywater Environment Agency (Thames Region) Rob Cathcart English Nature (Peterborough) Richard Chadd Environment Agency (Anglian Region) Steve Chambers Environment Agency (North East Region) Fay Chester Lincolnshire FWAG Martin Christmas Environment Agency (North East Region) Melissa Clarkson Environment Agency (South West Region) Allison Crofts The Wildlife Trusts Judith Crompton Environment Agency (South West Region) ii Paula Cullen University of Ireland, Galway Jon Davies Cresswell Assoc. Annette Daykin British Waterways Joe Deimel Environment Agency (Midlands Region) Andreanne Demers University of Dublin Chris Extence Environment Agency (Anglian Region) John Foster Environment Agency (Southern Region) David Fraser English Nature (Peterborough) Martin Frayling Environment Agency (South West Region) Mary Gallagher Queen's University, Belfast Andy Graham Worcestershire Wildlife Trust Paul Greest Environment Agency (Welsh Region) Leila Griffiths British Waterways Catrin Grimstead Environment Agency (Welsh Region) Chantal Hagen English Nature (Eastern) Claire Hamilton Environment Agency (Thames Region) Joerg Hardege Hull University Paul Harding National Biodiversity Network Phil Harding Environment Agency (Midlands Region) Rachel Harding Environment Agency (North West Region) Nigel Hewlett Environment Agency (Anglian Region) Peter Hiley Scott Wilson David Holdich International Association of Astacology Shelley Howard Environment Agency (Midlands Region) Mererid Howells University of Wales, Cardiff David Hughes Ecological Services Ltd Richard Jennings Environment Agency (North East Region) Clare Johnson Environment Agency (North East Region) Erica Kemp Scott Wilson Nick Kite Environment Agency (Anglian Region) Goran Klobucar University of Zagreb, Croatia Pavel Kozak University of South Bohemia, Czech Rep. Katherine Land FPCR Jason Leach British Waterways Ben LeBas English Nature (Peak District & Derbyshire) Richard Leishman English Nature (Norfolk) Anne Lewis Environment Agency (North East Region) Rebecca Longfield Bullen Consultants Martyn Lucas University of Durham Jim Lyons Environment Agency (Midlands Region) Ivana Maguire University of Zagreb, Croatia iii Andy Martin Environment Agency (Thames Region) Louise McAlavey DoE Northern Ireland Ken Monro English Nature (Eastern) Martin Moore Moore & Moore Carp Andrew Morissey Environment Agency (North West Region) Jo Mosley Environment Agency (Midlands Region) Leela O’Dea British Waterways Birgit Oidtmann University of Munich, Germany Jo Oldaker English Nature (Peterborough) Stephanie Peay Crayfish Enthusiast Philip Precey Derbyshire Wildlife Trust Stuart Priestley Durham Wildlife Trust Amanda Proud Ivel & Ouse Countryside Project Joe Quigley United Clyde Angling Protective Assoc. Ltd David Rendall Scottish Environmental Protection Agency Julian Reynolds Trinity College University of Dublin, Ireland Elaine Richmond Cresswell Associates Lesley Rippon Environment Agency (Midlands Region) Lisa Roberts Environment Agency (Midlands Region) David Rogers David Rogers Associates Emma Rothero Environment Agency (South West Region) Caroline Savage Environment Agency (Midlands Region) Alasdair Scott CEFAS Matt Shardlow Buglife Peter Sibley Environment Agency (Midlands Region) Stuart Silver British Waterways Fred Slater University of Wales, Cardiff Philip Smith Environment Agency (Anglian Region) Jo Spink Environment Agency (South West Region) Jeama Stanton University of Leicester Paul Stebbing University of Newcastle Joe Stevens Environment Agency (Southern Region) Jim Stewart Forestry Commission Belinda Steward Environment Agency (Midlands Region) Glyn Stewart British Waterways Caroline Tero Environment Agency (Anglian Region) John Tyler Kent Wildlife Trust Julia Varity Gloucester Wildlife Trust Gordon Watson University of Portsmouth Liz Watson David Rogers Associates
Recommended publications
  • DNA-Based Methods for Freshwater Biodiversity Conservation
    DNA-based methods for freshwater biodiversity conservation - Phylogeographic analysis of noble crayfish (Astacus astacus) and new insights into the distribution of crayfish plague DISSERTATION zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften Fachbereich 7: Natur- und Umweltwissenschaften der Universität Koblenz-Landau Campus Landau vorgelegt am 16. Januar 2013 von Anne Schrimpf geboren am 21. September 1984 in Frankfurt am Main Referent: Prof. Dr. Ralf Schulz Koreferent: Prof. Dr. Klaus Schwenk - This thesis is dedicated to my grandparents - Content CONTENT CONTENT ............................................................................................................... 5 ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................ 8 ZUSAMMENFASSUNG ........................................................................................ 10 ABBEREVIATIONS .............................................................................................. 13 GENERAL INTRODUCTION ................................................................................ 15 Conservation of biological diversity ........................................................................ 15 The freshwater crayfish ............................................................................................ 17 General ............................................................................................................... 17 The noble crayfish (Astacus astacus) ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating the Threat Posed by the Crayfish Plague Agent
    Estimating the threat posed by the crayfish plague agent Aphanomyces astaci to crayfish species of Europe and North America — Introduction pathways, distribution and genetic diversity by Jörn Panteleit from Aachen, Germany Accepted Dissertation thesis for the partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Doctor of Natural Sciences Fachbereich 7: Natur- und Umweltwissenschaften Universität Koblenz-Landau Thesis examiners: Prof. Dr. Ralf Schulz, University of Koblenz-Landau, Germany Dr. Japo Jussila, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Suomi-Finland Date of oral examination: January 17th, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. LIST OF PUBLICATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 3 2. ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Zusammenfassung ......................................................................................................................... 5 3. ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................................. 6 4. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 7 4.1 Invasive species ............................................................................................................................. 7 4.2 Freshwater crayfish in Europe ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Astacus Leptodactylus) in the Aras Reservoir
    A study on the bacterial infections of freshwater crayfish (Astacus leptodactylus) in the Aras reservoir Item Type monograph Authors Yahyazadeh, Mir Yousef; Soltani, M.; Sharif Rohani, M.; Afsharnasab, M.; Zorrieh Zahra, M.E.J.; Shiri, S.; Kakoolaki, S.; Alizadeh, Zh.; Shirvalilo, M.; Tukmachi, A.; Javidi, R. Publisher Iranian Fisheries Science Research Institute Download date 29/09/2021 00:25:57 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/39993 وزارت ﺟﻬﺎد ﻛﺸﺎورزي ﺳﺎزﻣﺎن ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎت، آﻣﻮزش و ﺗﺮوﻳﺞﻛﺸﺎورزي ﻣﻮﺳﺴﻪ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎت ﻋﻠﻮم ﺷﻴﻼﺗﻲ ﻛﺸﻮر – ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎت آرﺗﻤﻴﺎي ﻛﺸﻮر ﻋﻨﻮان: ﺑﺮرﺳﻲ آﻟﻮدﮔﻲ ﻫﺎي ﺑﺎﻛﺘﺮﻳﺎﻳﻲ ﺷﺎه ﻣﻴﮕﻮي ﺳﺪ ارس ﻣﺠﺮي: ﻣﻴﺮ ﻳﻮﺳﻒ ﻳﺤﻴﻲ زاده ﺷﻤﺎره ﺛﺒﺖ 47478 وزارت ﺟﻬﺎد ﻛﺸﺎورزي ﺳﺎزﻣﺎن ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎت، آﻣﻮزش و ﺗﺮوﻳﭻ ﻛﺸﺎورزي ﻣﻮﺳﺴﻪ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎت ﻋﻠﻮم ﺷﻴﻼﺗﻲ ﻛﺸﻮر- ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎت آرﺗﻤﻴﺎي ﻛﺸﻮر ﻋﻨﻮان ﭘﺮوژه : ﺑﺮرﺳﻲ آﻟﻮدﮔﻲ ﻫﺎي ﺑﺎﻛﺘﺮﻳﺎﻳﻲ ﺷﺎه ﻣﻴﮕﻮي ﺳﺪ ارس ﺷﻤﺎره ﻣﺼﻮب ﭘﺮوژه : 91170 4-79-12- ﻧﺎم و ﻧﺎم ﺧﺎﻧﻮادﮔﻲ ﻧﮕﺎرﻧﺪه/ ﻧﮕﺎرﻧﺪﮔﺎن : ﻣﻴﺮ ﻳﻮﺳﻒ ﻳﺤﻴﻲ زاده ﻧﺎم و ﻧﺎم ﺧﺎﻧﻮادﮔﻲ ﻣﺠﺮي ﻣﺴﺌﻮل ( اﺧﺘﺼﺎص ﺑﻪ ﭘﺮوژه ﻫﺎ و ﻃﺮﺣﻬﺎي ﻣﻠﻲ و ﻣﺸﺘﺮك دارد ) : ﻧﺎم و ﻧﺎم ﺧﺎﻧﻮادﮔﻲ ﻣﺠﺮي / ﻣﺠﺮﻳﺎن : ﻣﻴﺮ ﻳﻮﺳﻒ ﻳﺤﻴﻲ زاده ﻧﺎم و ﻧﺎم ﺧﺎﻧﻮادﮔﻲ ﻫﻤﻜﺎر(ان) : ﻣﻬﺪي ﺳﻠﻄﺎﻧﻲ ، ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ ﺷﺮﻳﻒ روﺣﺎﻧﻲ ،ﺻﺎﺑﺮ ﺷﻴﺮي ، ﻣﺤﻤﺪ اﻓﺸﺎرﻧﺴﺐ ، ﺳﻴﺪﺟﻠﻴﻞ ذرﻳﻪ زﻫﺮا ، ژاﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﺰاده اوﺻﺎﻟﻮ ، ﺷﺎﭘﻮر ﻛﺎﻛﻮﻟﻜﻲ، اﻣﻴﺮ ﺗﻜﻤﻪ ﭼﻲ، ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺷﻴﺮ وﻟﻴﻠﻮ ، رﺿﺎ ﺟﺎوﻳﺪي ﻧﺎم و ﻧﺎم ﺧﺎﻧﻮادﮔﻲ ﻣﺸﺎور(ان) : - ﻧﺎم و ﻧﺎم ﺧﺎﻧﻮادﮔﻲ ﻧﺎﻇﺮ(ان) : - ﻣﺤﻞ اﺟﺮا : اﺳﺘﺎن آذرﺑﺎﻳﺠﺎن ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺗﺎرﻳﺦ ﺷﺮوع : 91/7/1 ﻣﺪت اﺟﺮا : 2 ﺳﺎل ﻧﺎﺷﺮ : ﻣﻮﺳﺴﻪ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎت ﻋﻠﻮم ﺷﻴﻼﺗﻲ ﻛﺸﻮر ﺗﺎرﻳﺦ اﻧﺘﺸﺎر : ﺳﺎل1395 ﺣﻖ ﭼﺎپ ﺑﺮاي ﻣﺆﻟﻒ ﻣﺤﻔﻮظ اﺳﺖ . ﻧﻘﻞ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺐ ، ﺗﺼﺎوﻳﺮ ، ﺟﺪاول ، ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ﻫﺎ و ﻧﻤﻮدارﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ذﻛﺮ ﻣﺄﺧﺬ ﺑﻼﻣﺎﻧﻊ اﺳﺖ . « ﺳﻮاﺑﻖ ﻃﺮح ﻳﺎ ﭘﺮوژه و ﻣﺠﺮي ﻣﺴﺌﻮل / ﻣﺠﺮي» ﭘﺮوژه : ﺑﺮرﺳﻲ آﻟﻮدﮔﻲ ﻫﺎي ﺑﺎﻛﺘﺮﻳﺎﻳﻲ ﺷﺎه ﻣﻴﮕﻮي ﺳﺪ ارس ﻛﺪ ﻣﺼﻮب : -91170 12- 79-4 79-4 ﺷﻤﺎره ﺛﺒﺖ (ﻓﺮوﺳﺖ) : 47478 ﺗﺎرﻳﺦ : /14/5 94 ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ اﺟﺮاﻳﻲ ﺟﻨﺎب آﻗﺎي ﻣﻴﺮ ﻳﻮﺳﻒ ﻳﺤﻴﻲ زاده داراي ﻣﺪرك ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻠﻲ دﻛﺘﺮي در رﺷﺘﻪ داﻣﭙﺰﺷﻜﻲ ﻣﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
    [Show full text]
  • Crayfish News  Volume 32 Issue 1-2: Page 1
    June 2010 Volume 32, Issue 1-2 ISSN: 1023-8174 (print), 2150-9239 (online) The Official Newsletter of the International Association of Astacology Inside this issue: Cover Story 1 Searching for Crayfish in the President’s Corner 2 River Bug, Ukraine Info About IAA18 3 Future Directions 4 Symposium Info Short Articles 6 Male Form 6 Alternation in Spinycheek Crayfish, Orconectes limosus, at Cessy (East-central France): The Discovery of Anomalous Form Males IAA Related News 10 News Items From 11 Around the World Meeting 13 Announcements Literature of 16 Interest to Astacologists Figure 1. Astacus leptodactylus from the River Bug, Ukraine. comparison with other species, information n official opportunity for the author on A. pachypus is very limited (Souty-Grosset A to travel to the Ukraine was the 2nd et al., 2006). Since no specimens were meeting of the signatories to the available to be photographed for the “Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on identification guide of crayfish species in the Conservation and Management of the Europe (Pöckl et al., 2006), only a sketch was middle European population of the Great presented. Bustard (Otis tarda)” under the “Convention Feodosia, located on the Crimean of Migratory Species of Wild Animals” (CMS th Peninsula, is not easily reached by airplane, or Bonn Convention) from November 8-12 with the nearest airport being in Simferopol. 2008. There are no direct flights to this region from The author has always dreamed of most European capitals, with connecting visiting the Ukraine in order to collect flights running through Kiev, Moscow or specimens of the thick-clawed crayfish, Istanbul.
    [Show full text]
  • THE DISTRIBUTION of NATIVE and INTRODUCED SPECIES of CRAYFISH in AUSTRIA MANFRED POCKL (Dr M. Pockl, Department of Limnology, In
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Aquatic Commons 4 MANFRED POCKL THE DISTRIBUTION OF NATIVE AND INTRODUCED SPECIES OF CRAYFISH IN AUSTRIA MANFRED POCKL (Dr M. Pockl, Department of Limnology, Institute of Zoology, University of Vienna, and State Government of Lower Austria, Experts for the Conservation of Nature, Landhausplatz 1, A-3109 St Pölten, Austria.) Introduction Crayfish are the largest invertebrates found in European freshwaters north of the Mediterannean region, where river-crabs (Potamon) also occur. Some crayfish attain body lengths greater than 25 cm and exceed 350 g in weight. These decapod crustaceans are omnivores, feeding on a wide variety of small invertebrates, fish, algae and higher aquatic plants, including some riparian vegetation. They also scavenge on dead and dying plants and animals. However, their quantitative role in the trophic economy of streams and lakes is not well understood, especially in relation to population biomass and potential competition with fish. Like the latter, however, crayfish have long been prized by man as a source of food, and in parts of Europe some species have been exploited commercially for many centuries. The most notable of these is the fishery based on the red-clawed or noble crayfish Astacus astacus, which was decimated by the lethal plague fungus Aphanomyces astaci in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Importations of relatively large species from North America, which are resistant to the fungus but can act as carriers, has led to concerns for the continued existence and conservation of native European species, several of which are now listed as endangered species.
    [Show full text]
  • River Avon (Bristol) – Sommerfords Fishing Association
    River Avon (Bristol) – Sommerfords Fishing Association An advisory visit carried out by the Wild Trout Trust – March 2012 1 1. Introduction This report is the output of a Wild Trout Trust advisory visit undertaken on a stretch of the River Avon on waters controlled by the Sommerfords Fishing Association. The club has approximately 11Km of fishing but the advisory visit was restricted to the top beat, above Kingsmead Mill NGR ST 956844. The request for the visit was made by Mr. Ian Mock, who serves on the club committee and is the club’s Treasurer. The Sommerfords FA manages the Avon as a mixed fishery, where the emphasis is mainly on coarse fishing. The club undertakes some trout stocking on the 1km reach downstream of Kingsmead Mill, with an annual introduction of approximately 300 triploid brown trout. The top beat is not stocked and the members target both wild trout and coarse fish from this section. There is concern that results from the top beat have been in decline in recent years and the club is keen to explore opportunities to improve habitat for flow-loving, gravel spawning fish species. Comments in this report are based on observations on the day of the site visit and discussions with Mr. Mock. Throughout the report, normal convention is followed with respect to bank identification i.e. banks are designated Left Bank (LB) or Right Bank (RB) whilst looking downstream. Sommerfords FA beat above Kingsmead Mill 2 2. Catchment overview The upper Bristol Avon rises east of the town of Chipping Sodbury in South Gloucestershire, just north of the village of Acton Turnville.
    [Show full text]
  • Arrival of Non-Indigenous Crayfish Species
    Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst. 2016, 417, 37 Knowledge & © G. Kotovska et al., Published by EDP Sciences 2016 Management of Aquatic DOI: 10.1051/kmae/2016024 Ecosystems www.kmae-journal.org Journal fully supported by Onema RESEARCH PAPER East European crayfish stocks at risk: arrival of non-indigenous crayfish species Ganna Kotovska1, Dmytro Khrystenko1,2,*,Jiří Patoka3,a and Antonín Kouba4,a 1 Institute of Fisheries of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Obuhivska 135, Kyiv 03164, Ukraine 2 Cornell University, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, International Programs, B75 Mann Library, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA 3 Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Kamycká 129, Prague 6–Suchdol 165 21, Czech Republic 4 University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Zátisí 728/II, Vodňany 389 25, Czech Republic Abstract – An increasing number of non-indigenous crayfish species (NICS) of apparently pet trade origin have become established particularly in Europe. Especially alarming are recent confirmation of two distantly separated marbled crayfish Procambarus fallax f. virginalis populations in Ukraine and indications of more North American cambarids present in the local pet market. The present study aimed to investigate crayfish species availability within the Ukrainian pet trade together with the climate match and risk they represent to the freshwater ecosystems generally and indigenous crayfish species in particular. Altogether, 15 NICS belonging to all three crayfish families were detected. Considering their origin, availability, probability of establishment, invasiveness and further aspects, marbled crayfish and red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii appear to be potentially the most troubling.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix L1 - Ecological Monitoring Methodologies
    Appendix L1 - Ecological Monitoring Methodologies Macro-invertebrate flow assessment - LIFE A flow diagram showing the steps taken to assess the suitability of the macro-invertebrate community to the flow conditions in the river is shown in Figure L1.1 and described below. Assessment of flow conditions using macro-invertebrates is based on the Lotic-invertebrate Index for Flow Evaluation (LIFE) (Ref. L1). Macro-invertebrates are collected using a standard 3-minute kick sample and sorted following ‘Procedures for Collecting and Analysing Macro-invertebrate Samples’ (BT 001) published by the Environment Agency (Ref. L2). The invertebrate processing was subject to an analytical quality control scheme as detailed in ‘Procedure for quality assurance for RIVPACS compatible macro-invertebrate samples analysed to the taxonomic level needed for the BMWP-score’. BT 003 (Ref. L3). Each scoring taxa or species is allocated a LIFE score that is dependent on its flow/current velocity requirements and the number of individuals present. In most samples from the Malmesbury Avon there are 20 to 30 taxa present in a sample. The score for each taxa is added together and the total is divided by the number of scoring taxa/species to give the LIFE score for the sample. The theoretical range for LIFE scores is 1-12 although scores typically range between 8 for high gradient headwaters and 6 for slower flowing impounded stretches of water. Ten sites were selected by the Environment Agency on the Sherston and Tetbury arms and main Avon below Malmesbury and have been sampled in 2001, 2002 and 2004. Samples were taken in spring, summer and autumn wherever resources permitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Bristol Avon Consultation Draft
    U E T K f i - £ local environment agency plan BRISTOL AVON CONSULTATION DRAFT E n v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y MAP 1 Map 1 - Local authority boundaries Map 2 - Exceedences of critical loads of acidity for soils SO 00 SP District Councils Stroud West Wiltshire Modelled Sulphur Cotswold Mendip Deposition for 1995 North Wiltshire Salisbury Kennet South Somerset 10km Thampsriown TETBURY ' s!"' MALMESBURY- uth of the Severn WOOTTON iCREAT SO M ERFO RD ^ # J UDAUNTSEY BUSHTON CHIPPENHAM Exceedence (Kilogramme equivalent of CALNE \ hydrogen ions per hectare per year) Not Exceeded KEYNSHAM BATH BEANACREM 0.0 - 0.2 fMELKSfi! SOUTH WRAXALL 0.2 - 0.5 ,BRADFORD ON AVON DEVIZES Modelled Sulphur 0.5- 1.0 Deposition for 2005 TROWBRIDGE RADSTOCK \ LITTON/ MIDSOMER- ‘vCHEWTON NORTON- ( m e n d ip I C ,J ' FROME: ;----WESTBURY Unitary Authonties Catchment Boundary North Somerset Bath and North East Somerset Settlement Bristol City Council Local Authority © Crown Boundary South Gloucestershire Copyright Source: Critical Loads Mapping and Data Centre, ITE Monks Wood - Data acknowledgement: CMC Soils sub-group, Hull University © Crown Copyright © Crown Copyright ENVIRONMENT AGENCY Map 3 - Bristol Avon Catchment Area © Crown Copyright t Map 4 - Compliance with River Quality Objectives (River Ecosystem Classification 1997) © Crown Copyright MAPS MAP 6 Map 5 - EC Directives Map 6 - STWs Causing or Contributing to Degraded Water Quality SO 00 SP SOOOSP Cause/contribute to May cause/contribute to EC Dangerous Substance AA A▲ monitoring site RQO and LT-RQO RQO and
    [Show full text]
  • Development of New Genome-Informed Genotyping Tools for Aphanomyces Astaci
    Development of new genome-informed genotyping tools for Aphanomyces astaci Submitted by Diana Minardi to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biological Sciences In May 2017 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature: ………………………………………………………….. 1 Acknowledgements I would like to sincerely thank my supervisors Dr Mark van der Giezen, Dr David Studholme, and Dr Birgit Oidtmann for their invaluable guidance and support during these 3 years (plus a bit) of PhD, both practically and in the writing of the thesis. I would like to thank Cefas and the University of Exeter for funding the project and for giving me the opportunity to embrace this challenge and adventure. I would like to thank all of the University of Exeter “Biocat” lab and office, with whom I’ve spent most of my coffee time. But especially Mirella (for the laughs and cries) and Simone (for the sweaty runs around campus). I would also like to thank Chiara for her constant support, encouragement, and beer. Finally, I would like to thank Tony, for his patience, and my family, for their “overseas” support: I’ve finally finished “the shrimp” book! 2 Abstract Aphanomyces spp. are water moulds, eukaryotic fungus-like organisms, belonging to the class Oomycota.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Bristol Avon Catchment Management Plan Consultation Report Is the NRA’S Initial Analysis of the Issues Facing the Catchment
    NRA South West 36 8 $ UPPER BRISTOL AVON CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSULTATION REPORT JU N E 1994 E n v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE HEAD OFFICE Rio House, Waterside Drive. Aztec West, Almondsbury, Bristol BS32 4UD ENVIRONMENT AGENCY iiiiii iiiii mu i ii hi 0062321 This document is printed on recycled paper YOU R VIEW S The Upper Bristol Avon Catchment Management Plan Consultation Report is the NRA’s initial analysis of the issues facing the catchment. We want to hear your views. * Have we identified all the issues? * Have we identified all the options for solutions? * Have you any comments on the issues and options listed? If so, we would like to hear from you. Comments on the Upper Bristol Avon Catchment Management Consultation Report are best sent in writing and should be received by Tuesday 6 September 1994. To comment, please write to: Alan Turner North Wessex Area Catchment Planner NRA South Western Region Rivers House East Quay Bridgwater Somerset TA6 4YS Tel: Bridgwater (0278) 457333 Ext 4765 THE NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORITY The NRA’s mission and aims are as follows: "We will protect and improve the water environment by the effective management of water resources and by substantial reductions in pollution. We will aim to provide effective defence for people and property against flooding from rivers and the sea. In discharging our duties we will operate openly and balance the interest of all who benefit from and use rivers, groundwaters, estuaries, and coastal waters. We will be businesslike, efficient and caring towards our employees".
    [Show full text]
  • THE UNIVERSITY of HULL the Behavioural Function Of
    THE UNIVERSITY OF HULL The behavioural function of pheromones in crayfish being a Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of Hull by Fiona Catherine Berry (MRes University of York; BSc University of St Andrews) September 2008 Contents Acknowledgements 1 Abstract 2 Chapter 1 - Introduction 3 t.l Biological communication 4 1.1.2 Chemical communication 4 1.1.3 Aquatic chemical signalling 6 1.1.4 Aquatic chemical signalling - crustaceans 7 1.2 The chemical nature of pheromones 9 1.2.1 Pheromone identification 9 1.2.2 Bioassay development 10 1.2.3 Chemical analysis 11 1.3 The use of pheromones to control invasive species 11 1.4 Biological and ecology of crayfish (The Astacoidea) 12 1.4.1 Morphology and growth 13 1.4.2 Life history strategies 14 1.4.3 Crayfish in the UK and Europe 15 1.4.3.1 White-clawed crayfish in the UK 16 1.4.3.2 Non-indigenous crayfish 17 1.4.4 Controlling invasive crayfish species 19 1.5 Current knowledge of the role of chemical communication in crayfish, in the context of behaviour 21 1.5.1 Inter-specific chemical communication 22 1.5.2 Reproduction 22 1.5.3 Mate choice 25 1.5.4 Agonism 26 1.6 Aims and Objectives 27 Chapter 2 - General methodology 31 2.1 Animal maintenance 32 2.1.1 Collection 32 2.1.2 Legislation and holding 32 2.2 Experimental procedures 33 2.2.1 Identification 33 2.2.2 Isolation 33 2.2.3 Blindfolding 34 2.2.4 General experimental protocols 34 2.2.5 Checking for receptivity 34 2.2.6 Urine visualisation 35 2.2.7 Urine sampling technique 36 2.2.8 Conditioned water 36
    [Show full text]