Recollections of a Man

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Recollections of a Man Recollections of a Man Shostakovich was a man of contradictions. Of course, he had a group of devoted The family memories collected in the musicians who can also be regarded as his monograph by Seroff convey the picture of friends: the Beethoven Quartet, David an unusually gifted young man, incredibly Oistrakh, Mstislav Rostropovich, Moisei hard-working, caring for, improving Vainberg - but these were, mainly, artistic the living standards of his family - and, friendships. simultaneously, an everyday nuisance. These inborn character features became This stemmed not only from the fact that, more and more prominent as, throughout during the composer’s most difficult years, the years, his life was submitted to severe people broke with him for their own security, tests and experience, when the problem but also because Shostakovich used to keep was not to provide himself and his family people at bay. It suffices to mention that he with adequate livelihood, but how to addressed very few people by their survive and avoid repression. Christian names and he would refer even to So, his difficult character underwent his closest friends in a formal way or by changes, which eventually led him to a means of their patronymic. Hence, to state wherein it would be hard to speak Sollertinsky he would say ”Ivan Ivanovich”, about Shostakovich as a human being to Glikman ”Isaac Davidovich”, although responding in an ordinary way, thinking not always consistently. All of his life rationally and acting consistently. he used ”Mister” to Mravinsky, and with Oistrakh they called each other by their His behaviour was beyond unequivocal first names only in Shostakovich’s final evaluation. Some people saw an opportunist years. A factor in his isolation was his in him, others judged his actions as signifying latent inability to build up contacts. his disapproval of the Soviet authorities, He himself wrote about that while recalling still others saw him as an embodiment of a his first encounter with Sollertinsky; typical Russian possessed man who pretends yet when raging terror created general fear, to be not quite sane and, under the guise of Shostakovich could become absolutely mental deficiency, discloses to the world in detached. The proof for that comes from an obscure manner what is true, and, by the memoirs by Nicholas Nabokov, Arthur coarse, colourless, and deliberately awkward Miller, and Hans Mayer. Having few words, reveals his thoughts. friends, Shostakovich inevitably socialised with people who played a very ambiguous Probably he was partly all of these things, role in the cultural life of the Soviet Union. and they came inseparably together in him - like his remarkable modesty and lack of My desire to make contact with Shostakovich belief in his own potentials, blended with arose in the late Fifties. The reason why his morbid (sic) ambition to be the first and was certainly his music rather than him as the best. a person, because what I knew from official sources in those days did not encourage Obviously, his behaviour and demeanour one to make an acquaintance. In Poland, did not win people’s hearts, though many as in all communist countries, considered themselves his friends. Shostakovich was associated first of all However, in his whole life he had only a with pieces like Song of the Forests and, few real friends; their names can be reeled at best, the Leningrad or the Fifth Symphony off quickly: apart from Sollertinsky, there (defined solely as ”the answer of a Russian were undoubtedly Isaac Glikman and Leo composer to just criticism”). Arnshtam. His friendship with Mravinsky was irrevocably broken in the early Sixties. Apart from such works, there were his His relations with Shebalin were also clouded, many unbearable propaganda-ideological as well as with the young Denisov, whom statements, blatantly mirroring the attitude he strongly supported for some time. of the communist Party, which, for a majority of the Polish intelligentsia, were enough to condemn him. Such masterpieces as The Nose and Lady Macbeth and his early symphonies (except the First) were not 9 n°4 - winter 1995 widely known, Soviet propaganda insisting that I will be away from Moscow...” Yet I did not they were artistically degenerate. drop out of my trip and when I reached Moscow, Thus, for me Shostakovich existed only as the I made up my mind to try my luck come what composer of the First, Fifth, Ninth, and Tenth may. symphonies, the Piano Quintet, and the Cello Sonata, since, in those years, practically nothing I went to the office of the Composers’ Union else was performed. where Khrennikov’s personal secretary informed me with forced politeness that Dmitri The First and Tenth symphonies sufficed, however, Shostakovich was at home (!) and would stay in to open to me, as a teenage music student, Moscow for a week, but that he was too busy to a fascinating new world of sound. receive visitors. Giving me his telephone number The rarity of his music in itself made me eager was out of the question. I sensed that my wish to to get to know as many of his pieces as possible, meet him was not welcome among the officials yet the chances to do so were extremely restricted. of the Union - yet I never managed properly to A few people privileged to meet Shostakovich assess the extent and depth of their resentment personally brought him closer to me and, in their towards Shostakovich. When in the late Eighties descriptions, an official advocate of peace and I asked one of the more polite high-ranking the principles of Socialist Realism was replaced Union functionaries to hand over a small parcel by a tragic victim of the communist regime, to the composer’s widow, I found out after seve- an intimidated man, deprived of the liberty to create ral months that it had not been delivered because and act. Unfortunately, school obligations did not ”no one knows where Mrs Shostakovich is”. allow me to attend the ”Warsaw Autumn” of Meanwhile the ”unobtainable” person lived four 1959 (I lived in Cracow then), so I lost a chance floors above in the same building throughout all to meet him in person. Yet since his music made that time! me more and more impressed (I got to know the then-new Eleventh Symphony at that time), The following year, having wasted several weeks I decided to write a letter to the master and on arranging passport formalities I set off again unfold to him my feelings under the influence of to Moscow. At that time the composer did not his art. It was a long letter and I think I enclosed dwell in Kutuzovsky Prospect, but in the very some of my own pieces. As I didn’t expect to centre of Moscow in a small street previously hear from him, my joy was great when, contrary called Brusovsky Close, for years inhabited by to hearsay about his inaccessibility, a reply came many outstanding artists. Among others, after a couple of weeks, including a photo with a Vsevolod Meyerhold lived there from 1928 till dedication. It coincided with my composer’s his death. In this street there also lived debut, so, full of excitement, I described this in the outstanding singer Antonyna Niezdanova, my next letter, simultaneously thanking him for whose name the street assumed after her death. his quick answer. Another letter arrived, this time Here too stands a small Orthodox Church, one of on a piece of thin card, perhaps the remains of a few not closed down even during the worst some package, contained these few words : years. Niezdanova Street is an offshoot from one ”Dear Krzysztof! I congratulate you on your first of the main Moscow traffic arteries, Tverska concert. Wishing you creative success. (renamed Gorky Street when Gorky was still Affectionately yours, D. Shostakovich”. alive) and ends near Hertzen Street, known for This is how a correspondence began - as yet, the Conservatoire with its famous Piotr of course, not intensive - between a world- Tchaikovsky Great Concert Hall. The first part of famous composer and a teenage highschool Niezdanova Street is connected by a small alley pupil, later a conservatoire student. Shostakovich’s to the equally small Ogariev Street which runs letters were always very concrete and brief parallel with it. In the late Fifties this alley was though warmhearted, which made me resolve to built over by a complex of many-storied edifices visit Moscow one day and meet him in person. in the Socialist Realist style. This wing of Niezdanova Street was occupied by the Soviet In those times, a trip abroad - even to the so-called Composers’ Union and its branch, the Russian countries of the people’s democracies and Republic Composers’ Union, which for eight the Soviet Union - was an exceedingly difficult years was headed by Shostakovich. Here also undertaking. Private trips were basically not allowed was the editorial office of the Sovetskaya Muzika and places in group excursions were hard to monthly, a concert hall, the department of foreign come by. After a couple of months of various contacts, and a low-priced but (by Moscow standards) problems, I finally succeeded in arranging the elegant restaurant open only to Composers’ formalities, and wrote to Shostakovich that I was Union members. Those blocks of flats were inhabited coming to Moscow and would be delighted to by over a hundred families belonging to the see him there. On the eve of my departure country’s most eminent composers, musicologists, I received the following letter : ”...Unfortunately and performers - among them, on floor 6, I will not be able to meet you, since at that time Shostakovich, and a floor below him, 10 n°4 - winter 1995 Aram Khachaturian and Dmitri Kabalevsky.
Recommended publications
  • University Symphony Orchestra "Encounters"
    FierbergerCollegeYEARS of Fine Arts University Symphony Orchestra "Encounters" Timothy Russell, conductor Mischa Semanitzky and Gunther Schuller, guest conductors Kimberly Marshall, organ David Ballou, trumpet Seamus Blake, tenor saxophone Allan Chase, alto saxophone With the ASU Concert Jazz Band School of Music Herberger College of Fine Arts Arizona State University Friday, September 17, 2004 7:30 p.m. Gammage Auditorium ARIZONA STATE M UNIVERSITY Program Overture to Nabucco Giuseppe Verdi (1813 — 1901) Timothy Russell, conductor Symphony No. 3 (Symphony — Poem) Aram ifyich Khachaturian (1903 — 1978) Allegro moderato, maestoso Allegro Andante sostenuto Maestoso — Tempo I (played without pause) Kimberly Marshall, organ Mischa Semanitzky, conductor Intermission Remarks by Dean J. Robert Wills Remarks by Gunther Schuller Encounters (2003) Gunther Schuller (b.1925) I. Tempo moderato II. Quasi Presto III. Adagio IV. Misterioso (played without pause) Gunther Schuller, conductor *Out of respect for the performers and those audience members around you, please turn all beepers, cell phones and watches to their silent mode. Thank you. Program Notes Symphony No. 3 – Aram Il'yich Khachaturian In November 1953, Aram Khachaturian acted on the encouraging signs of a cultural thaw following the death of Stalin six months earlier and wrote an article for the magazine Sovetskaya Muzika pleading for greater creative freedom. The way forward, he wrote, would have to be without the bureaucratic interference that had marred the creative efforts of previous years. How often in the past, he continues, 'have we listened to "monumental" works...that amounted to nothing but empty prattle by the composer, bolstered up by a contemporary theme announced in descriptive titles.' He was surely thinking of those countless odes to Stalin, Lenin and the Revolution, many of them subdivided into vividly worded sections; and in that respect Khachaturian had been no less guilty than most of his contemporaries.
    [Show full text]
  • National Festival Chamber Orchestra Saturday, June 6
    NATIONAL FESTIVAL CHAMBER ORCHESTRA SATURDAY, JUNE 6, 2015 . 8PM ELSIE & MARVIN DEKELBOUM CONCERT HALL PROGRAM Baljinder Sekhon Sun Dmitri Shostakovich/ Chamber Symphony, Op. 83a Rudolf Barshai Allegro Andantino Allegretto – Allegretto - intermission - Frank Martin Concerto for Seven Wind Instruments, Timpani, Percussion and String Orchestra Allegro Adagietto: Misterioso ed elegante Allegro vivace Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Symphony No. 35 in D Major, K. 385 (“Haffner”) Allegro con spirito Andante Minuetto – Trio Finale: Presto 9 Sun array of instruments; that is, each The idea of using orchestral strings BALJINDER SEKHON player has a keyboard instrument (a to perform string quartets is hardly a marimba, a xylophone, a vibraphone), novelty. Gustav Mahler created string Born August 1, 1980, Fairfax, Virginia ‘skin’ (containing a drumhead), orchestra versions of Beethoven’s F Now living in Tampa, Florida wood and metal. In addition, the Minor Quartet (Op. 95) and Schubert’s three performers share a single large D Minor. Dimitri Mitropoulos gave This work for percussion trio was cymbal that is central to the staging. us a similar treatment of Beethoven’s composed in 2010–2011 under a At times the three percussion parts C-sharp Minor, Op. 131. Wilhelm commission from the Volta Trio, which are treated as one large instrument Furtwängler and Arturo Toscanini introduced it in a concert at Georgetown with three performers working toward performed and recorded individual University in Washington DC on a single musical character. Thus the movements from other Beethoven November 4, 2011. The score calls for orchestration and interaction alternate quartets. Toscanini also gave us a string- marimba, xylophone, vibraphone, large with each performer executing his/ orchestra version of Mendelssohn’s cymbal and “indeterminate skins, metals her own layers of sound to create a string octet — and Mendelssohn and woods.” Duration, 12 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Dimitri Shostakovich: a Catalogue of the Orchestral Music
    DIMITRI SHOSTAKOVICH: A CATALOGUE OF THE ORCHESTRAL MUSIC 1919: Scherzo in F sharp minor for orchestra, op.1: 5 minutes 1921-22: Theme with Variations in B major for orchestra, op.3: 15 minutes 1922: “Two Fables of Krilov” for mezzo-soprano, female chorus and chamber Orchestra, op.4: 7 minutes 1923-24: Scherzo in E flat for orchestra, op.7: 4 minutes 1924-25: Symphony No.1 in F minor, op.10: 32 minutes Prelude and Scherzo for string orchestra, op.11: 10 minutes 1927: Symphony No.2 “October” for chorus and orchestra, op.14: 21 minutes 1927-28: Suite from the Opera “The Nose” for orchestra, op. 15A 1928: “Tahiti-Trot” for orchestra, op. 16: 4 minutes 1928-29/76: Suite from “New Babylon” for orchestra, op. 18B: 40 minutes 1928-32: Six Romances on Words by Japanese poets for tenor and orchestra, op.21: 13 minutes 1929: Suite from “The Bedbug” for orchestra, op.19B Symphony No.3 in E flat major “The First of May” for chorus and orchestra, op.20: 32 minutes 1929-30: Ballet “The Age of Gold”, op.22: 134 minutes (and Ballet Suite, op. 22A: 23 minutes) 1930-31: Suite from “Alone” for orchestra, op. 26 B Ballet “The Bolt”, op.27: 145 minutes (and Ballet Suite, op.27A: 29 minutes) 1930-32: Suite from the Opera “Lady Macbeth of the Mtsensk District” for orchestra, op. 29A: 6 minutes 1931: Suite from “Golden Mountains” for orchestra, op.30A: 24 minutes Overture “The Green Company”, op. 30C (lost) 1931-32: Suite from “Hamlet” for small orchestra, op.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Pm, Thursday, 3 June 2010 Jackson Hall, Mondavi Center
    7 pm, Thursday, 3 June 2010 Jackson Hall, Mondavi center UC Davis symphony orChestra Christian BalDini, mUsiC DireCtor anD Conductor Family ConCert 7 pm, thUrsDay, 3 JUne 2010 JaCkson hall, monDavi Center PROGRAM Oblivion Astor Piazzolla (1921–92) Kikimora Anatoly Liadov (1855–1914) Lament Ching-Yi Wang Winner, 2010 Composition Readings Sinfonia Concertante in E-flat Major Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Presto (1756–91) Shawyon Malek-Salehi, violin Andy Tan, viola Winners, 2010 Concerto Competition Symphony No. 10 in E Minor Dmitri Shostakovich Finale: Andante – Allegro (1906–75) D. Kern Holoman, conductor Distinguished Professor of Music and Conductor Emeritus This concert is being professionally recorded for the university archive. Please keep distractions to a minimum. Cell phones, and other similar electronic devices should be turned off completely. UC DAVIS SYMPHONY orCHESTRA Christian BalDini, mUsiC DireCtor anD Conductor amanDa WU, manaGer lisa eleazarian, liBrarian Names appear in seating order. violin i viola Flute horn Cynthia Bates, Andy Tan, Susan Monticello, Rachel Howerton, concertmaster * principal * principal * principal * Yosef Farnsworth, Meredith Powell, Abby Green, Stephen Hudson concertmaster * principal * assistant principal * Adam Morales, Shawyon Malek-Salehi, Caitlin Murray Michelle Hwang principal assistant concertmaster * Melissa Lyans Chris Brown Bobby Olsen, Lucile Cain Ali Spurgeon co-principal Sharon Tsao * Pablo Frias oboe Maya Abramson* Andrew Benson Jaclyn Howerton, trumpet Raphael Moore * principal * Andrew
    [Show full text]
  • MTPII Shostakovich
    Copeland !1 Darcy Copeland Nate Bakkum Music, Time, and Place II April 18, 2016 SHOSTAKOVICH’S FIFTH SYMPHONY “I think it is clear to everyone what happens in the Fifth. The rejoicing is forced, created under threat… It’s as if someone were beating you with a stick and saying, ‘Your business is rejoicing, your business is rejoicing, your business is rejoicing,’ and you rise, shaky, and go marching off, muttering, ‘Our business is rejoicing, our business is rejoicing’” (Shostakovich, 14). Dmitry Shostakovich is undoubtedly one of Russia’s greatest composers in history, and his Fifth Symphony is one of his greatest masterpieces. Despite (or perhaps as a result of) spend- ing much of his life in fear of Stalin’s constant threat, Shostakovich was able to create a work that was powerful both musically and politically—a work that brought him to the forefront of the compositional world of his generation. The Fifth Symphony gave the world a new perspective through which we could understand the not only Shostakovich, but the oppressive, politically powered musical and cultural experiences in the Soviet Union under Stalin’s rule. Shostakovich’s true intent is quite clear in the symphony—however, Stalin’s regime utilized his “heroic ending” as a display of the grandiosity of the Soviet Union. Under Stalin’s rule, art and music in Soviet Russia was heavily policed, and artistic free- dom was immensely restricted. The purpose of art was to serve the government as propaganda— anything else was considered too Western, a betrayal punishable by persecution and even execu- tion.
    [Show full text]
  • Yevgeny Dolmatovsky
    WRITING ABOUT SHOSTAKOVICH Yevgeny Dolmatovsky Rabbi Hillel taught: Do not judge your fellow until you have stood in his place. Pirkei Avot 2:5. Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s … Matthew 22:21 by Sam Silverman evgeny Dolmatovsky wrote many of the texts which were set to music by Shostakovich. Most of these were either patriotic songs, or songs reflecting and eulogising the Communist Party propaganda positions. Because of these Ylatter poems he has been described and known as a second or third rate poet, and as a loyal party hack. The truth, however, is more complex, and one must look deeper into his history to understand him. Transliteration of names from the Cyrillic Russian alphabet can lead to variations. In this paper I have used “Dolmatovsky” and “Dolmatovskii” interchangeably for the Russian “Долматовский”. In one case, that of the doctoral thesis, in Ger- man, of Yevgeny’s father, the transliteration into German becomes “Dolmatowsky.” Early Years Yevgeny Aronovich Dolmatovsky was born in Moscow on May 5, 1915 (Obituary, The Independent (London), Novem- ber 17, 1994, hereinafter “Obituary”), the son of a famous Moscow lawyer who was later executed as an “enemy of the people” (Vaksberg, p. 262). Dolmatovsky died in Moscow on September 10, 1994 (Obituary, loc. cit.). His poems were very popular, and the royalties from the poems and from films had provided him with millions of roubles (Obituary, loc. cit.). His parents were Aron Moiseevich and Adel Dolmatovsky (International Who’s Who, see, e.g., volumes for 1989–1992). His father was born in Rostov-on-Don on 13 November 1880, the son of a merchant, Moisei [Moses] and his wife, Theo- dosia.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Concert Programs, Season 72
    ^ BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA FOUNDED IN I88I BY s^^ HENRY LEE HI SEVENTY-SECOND SEASON 195 2-T953 Sanders Theatre, Cambridge \^^arvard University^ Boston Symphony Orchestra (Seventy-second Season, 1952-1953) CHARLES MUNCH, Music Director RICHARD BURGIN, Associate Conductor PERSONNEL Violins Violas Bassoons Richard Burgin, Joseph de Pasquale Raymond Allard Concert-master Jean Cauhap^ Ernst Panenka Alfred Krips Georges Fourel Theodore Brewster George Zazofsky Eugen Lehner Rolland Tapley Albert Bernard Contra-Bassoon Norbert Lauga George Humphrey Richard Plaster Harry Dubbs Jerome lipson Vladimir ResnikofF Louis Ar litres Horns Harry Dickson Robert Karol James Stagliano Einar Hansen Reuben Green Harry Shapiro Joseph Leibovici Bernard Kadinoff Harold Meek Gottfried Wilfinger Vincent Mauricci Paul Keaney Emil Kornsand Walter Macdonald Roger Schermanski Violoncellos Osbourne McConathy Carlos Pinfield Samuel Mayes Paul Fedorovsky Alfred Zighera Trumpets Minot Beale Jacobus Langendoen Roger Voisin Herman Silberman Mischa Nieland Marcel Lafosse Stanley Benson Hippolyte Droeghmans Armando Ghitalla Leo Panasevich Karl Zeise Gerard Goguen Sheldon Rotenberg Josef Zimbler Clarence Knudson Bernard Parronchi Trombones Pierre Mayer Leon Marjollet {acob Raichman Manuel Zung William Moyer Kauko Kahila Samuel Diamond Flutes [osef Orosz Victor Manusevitch Doriot Anthony James Nagy James Pappoutsakis Tuba Leon Gorodetzky Phillip Kaplan Vinal Smith Raphael Del Sordo Piccolo Melvin Bryant Harps Lloyd Stonestreet George Madsen Saverio Messina Oboes Bernard Zighera
    [Show full text]
  • Evgeni Mravinsky Discography
    FRANK FORMAN AND KENZO AMOH Evgeni Mravinsky Discography Evgeni Alexandrovich Mravinsky (1903 I 6 I 4 St. Petersburg -1988I1I19 Leningrad) General Notes 1. All records are stereo unless noted as Grammophon's original Tchaikovsky monaural. Symphonies. See the List of Record Labels 2. LPs are 30 centimeters (12 inches) in diam­ below. eter unless stated otherwise. 9. This discography is a revision ofKenzo 3. The orchestra is the Leningrad Amoh, Frank Forman, and Hiroshi Philharmonic Symphony Orchestra unless Hashizume, Mravinsky Discography stated otherwise. (Osaka: The Japanese Mravinsky Society, 4. Recording data are mostly based on infor­ 1993 March 20). Agreat deal of peripheral mation from Alexandr Nevsorov (Moscow). material, such as photographs, a biography Discrepancies are noted. of the conductor, and several lists of con­ 5. ·~ before a recording date means that the certs, was omitted. exact date is unknown. The date given is 10. Grateful acknowledgements are owed to the earliest date that recording engineers several people: 1. Hiroshi Hashizume, sec­ were known to have checked the recording. retary of the Japanese Mravinsky Society; Alexandr Nevzorov (the discographers' cor­ 2. Alexandr Nevzorov, a Russian correspon­ respondent in Moscow) estimates that the dent, for his research in various archives; actual recording was made either on that 3. William D. Curtis, for the first known day or any time during the preceding compilation ofMravinsky's recordings; 4. month. Some anomalies, like the Donald R. Hodgman, a collector in New Ovsyaniko-Kulikovksy Symphony, remain. York City, for the loan of several dozen LPs; 6. Soviet LPs are numbered consecutively on 5. Paul Miller, a Los Angeles collector, for each side of the disc, instead of one number making a great many patient A-B compar­ for the entire disc.
    [Show full text]
  • Of New Collected Works
    DSCH PUBLISHERS CATALOGUE of New Collected Works FOR HIRE For information on purchasing our publications and hiring material, please apply to DSCH Publishers, 8, bld. 5, Olsufievsky pereulok, Moscow, 119021, Russia. Phone: 7 (499) 255-3265, 7 (499) 766-4199 E-mail: [email protected] www.shostakovich.ru © DSCH Publishers, Moscow, 2019 CONTENTS CATALOGUE OF PUBLICATIONS . 5 New Collected Works of Dmitri Shostakovich .................6 Series I. Symphonies ...............................6 Series II. Orchestral Compositions .....................8 Series III. Instrumental Concertos .....................10 Series IV. Compositions for the Stage ..................11 Series V. Suites from Operas and Ballets ...............12 Series VI. Compositions for Choir and Orchestra (with or without soloists) ....................13 Series VII. Choral Compositions .......................14 Series VIII. Compositions for Solo Voice(s) and Orchestra ...15 Series IX. Chamber Compositions for Voice and Songs ....15 Series X. Chamber Instrumental Ensembles ............17 Series XI. Instrumental Sonatas . 18 Series ХII. Piano Compositions ........................18 Series ХIII. Incidental Music ...........................19 Series XIV. Film Music ...............................20 Series XV. Orchestrations of Works by Other Composers ...22 Publications ............................................24 Dmitri Shostakovich’s Archive Series .....................27 Books ..............................................27 FOR HIRE ..............................................30
    [Show full text]
  • Dmitri Shostakovich
    Dmitri Shostakovich Dmiti Shostakovich photo © Booseyprints __An Introduction to the music of Dmitri Shostakovich__ _by Gerard McBurney_ Dmitri Shostakovich is regarded by musicians and audiences alike as one of the most important and powerful composers of the 20th century. His music reflects his own personal journey through some of the most turbulent and tragic times of modern history. Even in his own lifetime many of his works established themselves internationally as part of the standard repertoire, and since his death his fame has increased year by year. Nowadays most of his 15 symphonies, the entire cycle of 15 string quartets, his _24 Preludes and Fugues_ for piano and his opera _Lady Macbeth of Mtsensk_, have come to occupy a central place in the experience of music lovers. And yet Shostakovich, a hugely prolific composer, wrote vast amounts of other music that is still hardly known. And much of it reflects sides to his character - humorous, sarcastic, absurd, funny, theatrical, deliciously tuneful - quite different from the dark and tragic mood most people associate with his name. In particular, when he was young, Shostakovich produced a stream of music for the theatre and cinema: operas, operettas, ballets, music-hall shows, incidental music for all kinds of plays from Shakespeare to propoganda, live music for silent cinema, recorded scores for early sound-movies, even an enchanting children's cartoon-opera. Much of this is music in a lighter or more popular vein, sparkling like champagne and a treat for musicians and audiences. It richly deserves to be heard and fascinatingly deepens our sense of the achievement of this remarkable artist.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    M u Ottawa L'Unh-wsiie eanadienne Canada's university FACULTE DES ETUDES SUPERIEURES IfisSJ FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND ET POSTOCTORALES U Ottawa POSDOCTORAL STUDIES L'Universite canadienne Canada's university Jada Watson AUTEUR DE LA THESE /AUTHOR OF THESIS M.A. (Musicology) GRADE/DEGREE Department of Music lATJULfEJ^LTbliP^ Aspects of the "Jewish" Folk Idiom in Dmitri Shostakovich's String Quartet No. 4, OP.83 (1949) TITREDE LA THESE/TITLE OF THESIS Phillip Murray Dineen _________________^ Douglas Clayton _______________ __^ EXAMINATEURS (EXAMINATRICES) DE LA THESE / THESIS EXAMINERS Lori Burns Roxane Prevost Gary W, Slater Le Doyen de la Faculte des etudes superieures et postdoctorales / Dean of the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies ASPECTS OF THE "JEWISH" FOLK IDIOM IN DMITRI SHOSTAKOVICH'S STRING QUARTET NO. 4, OP. 83 (1949) BY JADA WATSON Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master's of Arts degree in Musicology Department of Music Faculty of Arts University of Ottawa © Jada Watson, Ottawa, Canada, 2008 Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-48520-0 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-48520-0 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant
    [Show full text]
  • JOANN FALLETTA, Conductor ELIZABETH CABALLERO, Soprano
    LoKo Arts Festival Concert 2017 Festival Helen M. Hosmer Hall Performed April 29, 2017 Gloria (1959) Francis Poulenc (1899-1963) I. Gloria II. Laudamus te III. Domine Deus IV. Domine fili unigenite V. Domine Deus, Agnus Dei VI. Qui sedes ad dexteram Patris JOANN FALLETTA, Conductor ELIZABETH CABALLERO, Soprano CRANE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA Ching-Chun Lai, Director CRANE CHORUS Jeffrey Francom, Director Texts & Translations Gloria Gloria in excelsis Deo. Et in terra pax hominibus bonae voluntatis. Laudamus te, benedicimus te, adoramus te, glorificamus te; Gratias agimus, agimus tibi, Propter magnam gloriam tuam. Domine Deus, Rex coelestis! Deus, Pater omnipotens! Domine, Fili unigenite, Jesu Christe! Domine Deus! Agnus Dei! Filius Patris! Qui tollis peccata mundi, miserere nobis. Qui tollis peccata mundi, suscipe deprecationem nostram. Qui sedes ad dexteram Patris, miserere nobis. Quoniam tu solus sanctus. Tu solus Dominus. Tu solus altissimus, Jesu Christe! Cum Sancto Spirtitu in gloria Dei patris. Amen. Program Notes by Dr. Gary Busch The ebullient optimism of Francis Poulenc’s Gloria inhabits a world as distant as can be imagined from Sergei Rachmaninoff’s fatalistic vision expressed in The Bells. Yet, despite their contrasting spiritual viewpoints, the two works on tonight’s program share the common feature of having been inspired by a symbol of profound significance deeply harbored within the heart of each composer. For Rachmaninoff, the impetus was the comforting recollection of particular ever- present sounds that reassure humanity amid the bleakness of impending mortality – for Poulenc, it was the joyous rekindling of Catholicism, the religion of his childhood. Further uniting both works is the superlative esteem in which their composers held them.
    [Show full text]