Leonas Tolvaišis POLITICAL PARTIES and ETHNIC

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Leonas Tolvaišis POLITICAL PARTIES and ETHNIC VYTAUTAS MAGNUS UNIVERSITY Leonas Tolvaišis POLITICAL PARTIES AND ETHNIC MINORITY POLICIES, 1991-2011: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SERBIA'S HUNGARIANS AND ESTONIA'S RUSSIANS Doctoral dissertation Social science, political science (02S) Kaunas 2012 UDK 323.15 To-69 The dissertation was prepared at the Department of Political Science, Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy, Vytautas Magnus University, 2012. Academic Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Stefano Bianchini (University of Bologna, social sciences, political sciences, 02S). ISBN 978-9955-12-766-6 Acknowledgements I am indebted to my first academic supervisor, Professor Algimantas Prazauskas, whose lectures and expertise motivated me to specialize in ethnopolitics. I am also grateful to my PhD supervisor Professor Stefano Bianchini for providing me with unique opportunities for professional engagement in the area of Balkan studies and field research in the Balkans. Special thanks to coordinators of receiving institutions and experts on minority issues for their help during my internship periods in the countries covered by the present research: Estonia – Professor Vello Pettai, Faculty of Government and Politics, University of Tartu; Kristina Kallas, Institute of Baltic Studies, Tallinn; Serbia – Professor Fuada Stanković, Centre for Advanced European Studies and Research, University of Novi Sad; Dr. Zsolt Lázár, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad. I would also like to thank the Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy of Vytautas Magnus University, particularly Professor Ineta Dabašinskienė, Dr. Andžej Pukšto and Inga Černiauskaitė for their generous support and cooperation in enabling the present research to be conducted abroad. In addition, I thank all interviewed respondents and experts that agreed to participate in the present research, and Professor Carolyn Kadas for fast English language assistance. 3 CONTENTS CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................ 4 List of abbreviations................................................................................................................................ 6 List of tables ............................................................................................................................................ 8 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................... 9 Research problem and relevance............................................................................................................. 9 Objective, research questions and tasks ................................................................................................ 14 Research novelty and relevance ............................................................................................................ 15 Research theses...................................................................................................................................... 16 Methods................................................................................................................................................. 16 Structure ................................................................................................................................................ 17 Literature overview ............................................................................................................................... 18 1. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK......................................................................................................... 26 1. 1. Political parties and public policy shaping.................................................................................... 26 1.2. Party policy inertia and resistance to change.................................................................................. 40 1.3. Party policy change ........................................................................................................................ 49 1.4. Historical institutionalism as an explanatory framework ............................................................... 58 2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................... 61 3. THE CASE STUDY OF SERBIA’S HUNGARIANS.......................................................................... 67 3.1. Ethnic cleavage in the Serbian party system .................................................................................. 67 3.1.1. Stances on ethnic minority policies in Serbian political parties’ programs............................. 67 3.1.2. The intra-party structure of ethnic minority policy formulation ............................................. 83 3.1.3. The ethnic aspect of parties’ ideational dimension ................................................................. 89 3.2. Political parties and ethnic minority policies in Serbia ................................................................ 107 3.2.1. Critical junctural moments for ethnic minority policies at the outset of Serbia’s multi-party system.............................................................................................................................................. 107 3.2.2. Political parties and the regional legal framework of minority rights protection in Vojvodina ......................................................................................................................................................... 116 3.2.3. Political parties and Hungarian cultural autonomy in Serbia ................................................ 132 4. THE CASE STUDY OF ESTONIA’S RUSSIANS............................................................................ 138 4.1. Ethnic cleavage in the Estonian party system .............................................................................. 138 4.1.1. Stances on ethnic minority policies in Estonian political parties’ programs......................... 138 4.1.2. The intra-party structure of minority policy formulation ...................................................... 147 4.1.3. The ethnic aspect of the parties’ ideational dimension.......................................................... 155 4.2. Political parties and ethnic minority policies in Estonia .............................................................. 163 4 4.2.1. Critical junctural moments for ethnic minority policies at the outset of Estonia’s multi-party system.............................................................................................................................................. 163 4.2.2. Political parties and citizenship policies in Estonia............................................................... 166 4.2.3. Political parties and language policies in Estonia ................................................................. 179 4.2.4. Political parties and education policies in Estonia ................................................................ 186 4.2.5. Political parties and state integration policies in Estonia ...................................................... 190 4.2.6. Political parties and Russian cultural autonomy in Estonia................................................... 200 CONCLUSIONS..................................................................................................................................... 205 BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................................... 210 APPENDICES......................................................................................................................................... 227 Appendix 1. List of the persons interviewed....................................................................................... 227 Appendix 2. Structure of the semi-structured interview questionnaire ............................................... 229 5 List of abbreviations CPE – Communist Party of Estonia DS (Serb. Demokratska Stranka) – Democratic Party (Serbia) DSS (Serb. Demokratska Stranka Srbije) – Democratic Party of Serbia G17+ – G17 Plus (political party, Serbia) GSS (Serb. Građanski Savez Srbije) – Civic Alliance of Serbia DOS (Serb. Demokratska Opozicija Srbije) – Democratic Opposition of Serbia EEE (Est. Eesti Ettevõtjate Erakond) – Estonian Entrepreneurs’ Party EER (Est. Erakond Estimaa Rohelised) – Estonian Green Party EKE (Est. Eesti Koonderakond) – Estonian Coalition Party EKRE (Est. Eesti Konservatiivne Rahvaerakond) – Estonian Conservative Party ELDP (Est. Eesti Liberaaldemokraatlik Partei) – Estonian Liberal Democratic Party EME (Est. Eesti Maarahva Erakond) – Estonian People’s Union EML (Est. Estimaa Maaliit) – Estonian Country Union ERL (Est. Eestimaa Rahvaliit) – People’s Union of Estonia ERR (Est. Estimaa Rahvarinne) – Popular Front of Estonia ERSP (Est. Eesti Rahvusliku Sõltumatuse Partei) – Estonian National Independence Party EVP (Est. Eesti Vasakpartei) – Estonian Left Party EU – European Union HK – Hungarian Coalition ICTY – International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia IRL (Est. Isamaa ja Res Publica Liit) – Pro Patria and Res Publica Union (political party, Estonia) JUL (Serb. Jugoslovenska Ujedinjena Levica) – Yugoslav United Left KE (Est. Eesti Keskerakond) – Estonian Centre Party LCS – League of Communists of Serbia LCY – League of Communists of Yugoslavia LDP (Serb.
Recommended publications
  • Hungary's Policy Towards Its Kin Minorities
    Hungary’s policy towards its kin minorities: The effects of Hungary’s recent legislative measures on the human rights situation of persons belonging to its kin minorities Óscar Alberto Lema Bouza Supervisor: Prof. Zsolt Körtvélyesi Second Semester University: Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem, Budapest, Hungary Academic Year 2012/2013 Óscar A. Lema Bouza Abstract Abstract: This thesis focuses on the recent legislative measures introduced by Hungary aimed at kin minorities in the neighbouring countries. Considering as relevant the ones with the largest Hungarian minorities (i.e. Croatia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia and Ukraine), the thesis starts by presenting the background to the controversy, looking at the history, demographics and politics of the relevant states. After introducing the human rights standards contained in international and national legal instruments for the protection of minorities, the thesis looks at the reasons behind the enactment of the laws. To do so the politically dominant concept of Hungarian nation is examined. Finally, the author looks at the legal and political restrictions these measures face from the perspective of international law and the reactions of the affected countries, respectively. The research shows the strong dependency between the measures and the political conception of the nation, and points out the lack of amelioration of the human rights situation of ethnic Hungarians in the said countries. The reason given for this is the little effects produced on them by the measures adopted by Hungary and the potentially prejudicial nature of the reaction by the home states. The author advocates for a deeper cooperation between Hungary and the home states. Keywords: citizenship, ethnic preference, Fundamental Law, home state, human rights, Hungary, kin state, minorities, nation, Nationality Law, preferential treatment,Status Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Bronze Soldier April Crisis
    LEGAL INFORMATION CENTRE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS BRONZE SOLDIER APRIL CRISIS ISBN 978-9985-9542-7-0 TALLINN, 2007 BRONZE SOLDIER. April crisis сontentS PREFACE . 7 WAR OF THE MONUMENTS: A CHRONOLOGICAL REVIEW . 10 APRIL RIOTS IN TaLLINN: LEGAL ASPECTS . .24 Part I. LEGAL FRAMEWORK . 24 Part II. OVERVIEW OF APPLICATIONS AGAINST THE ACTIONS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS . 29 AFTERWORD . 43 ANNEX I . 44 ANNEX II . .50 6 PREFACE There is no doubt that the April events concerning the Bronze Soldier will become a benchmark in the contemporary history of the state of Estonia. It is the bifurcation point, the point of division, separating ‘before’ and ‘after’. For Estonian society these events are even more important than joining NATO or European Union. Before April 2007 we lived in one country and now we are getting used to living in another one. Or were these merely illusions and as Eugeny Golikov wrote «the world has not changed, it has just partially revealed its face» («Tallinn», no. 2‑3, 2007)? Before April 26, 2007 we, the population of Estonia, believed that we lived in a democratic country, with proper separation of powers, with efficiently balanced executive and legislative powers, with independent courts, a free press, social control over government, in particular over the security agencies, and so on. After April 26 it turned out that not all this was true, or was not exactly true, or was even false. It turned out that some mechanisms, considered deeply rooted in the democratic society, had no effect and some procedures were easily abandoned. Just one example: by order of the Police Prefect, all public rallies and meetings in Tallinn were prohibited from April 30 till May 11, 2007 and it did not result in any protests or even questions, although this was a restriction of the constitutional right to express opinions, the right of peaceful assembly, rally and demonstration.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom in the World - Serbia (2010)
    Page 1 of 5 Print Freedom in the World - Serbia (2010) Political Rights Score: 2 * Capital: Belgrade Civil Liberties Score: 2 * Status: Free Population: 7,322,000 Explanatory Note The ratings through 2002 are for the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, of which Serbia was a part, and those from 2003 through 2005 are for the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro. Kosovo is examined in a separate report. Ratings Change Serbia’s political rights rating improved from 3 to 2 due to the consolidation of a stable multiparty system after several rounds of elections in the post-Milosevic period. Overview The parliament in November approved a new statute regulating the autonomy of the northern province of Vojvodina, ending a long political debate over the issue and demonstrating the effectiveness of the Democratic Party–led government elected in 2008. The country also made progress in its relations with the European Union, securing visa-free travel rights and the implementation of a trade agreement in December. However, press freedom groups criticized a media law adopted in August, and tensions involving the ethnic Albanian population in the Presevo Valley remained a problem. Serbia was recognized as an independent state in 1878 after several centuries under Ottoman rule. It formed the core of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes proclaimed in 1918. After World War II, Serbia became a constituent republic of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, under the communist rule of Josip Broz Tito. Within the boundaries of the Serbian republic as drawn at that time were two autonomous provinces: the largely Albanian-populated Kosovo in the south, and Vojvodina, with a significant Hungarian minority, in the north.
    [Show full text]
  • Jenő Hajnal: National Identity Is Our Most Valuable Treasure
    Minister Ružić Meets with Representatives of Europe Insists on Rights of the National Minority National Minorities – Councils Serbia Respects These Rights 38 Minority Newjuly 2s 017 Jenő Hajnal: National Identity Is Our Most Valuable Treasure Participants in the Regional “Rose”- a Symbol NDI Roma Program Visit the and First Association Assembly of AP Vojvodina with Ruthenians HIGHLIGHT EDITORIAL 38 Minister Ružić Meets with Repre sentatives Rich ness i n Diver sity of the National Minority Do bar dan, mi rëdita, jó na pot, добър ден, bun ă ziua... B u njevac Councils Dužijan ca, Rut henian “Red Rose“, uniq ue Vlach customs , Rom a music , colourfu l Slovak natio na l costumes, kulen saus a ge from On July 25, in the Pal ace Serbia, Minister of Public Administration and Local Self- Pet rovac… – are on ly few of the featur es of the multina tional and m ulti cultural m osa ic of ou r coun try . Gover nment, Brank o Ruž ić, met with the represe ntatives of the natio na l mi - There is n o nee d to em phasize that nu merous minorities have nority co uncils in o rder to be i nformed lived in these lands together for centuries. Our politicians and about t he activ ities of the n ational mi - numero us foreign v isit ors fre quently p oint to th is fa ct. T he Au - nority counc ils an d the mo st imp ortant tonomous Province of Vojvodina is an unique example of multi - challenges they face in their work.
    [Show full text]
  • XXIX Days of Estonian Jurisprudents 15 Years of Legal Reforms in Estonia Tartu, 19–20 October 2006
    XXIX Days of Estonian Jurisprudents 15 Years of Legal Reforms in Estonia Tartu, 19–20 October 2006 JURIDICA INTERNATIONAL XI/2006 195 XXIX Days of Estonian Jurisprudents Thursday, 19 October 9.0010.00 Registration and morning coffee 10.00 Opening address by Rein Lang, Minister of Justice Morning plenary (Vanemuine Concert Hall) Chairs: Professor Kalle Merusk, Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Tartu; Chairman of the Estonian Academic Law Society Ingrid Siimann, Acting President of the Estonian Lawyers Union 10.1510.40 Ph.D. Jüri Raidla Start of Legal Reforms: from the War of Laws to the Constitution Attorney-at-law, Law Office Raidla & Partners 10.4011.05 Professor Jean-Pierre Massias The Role of Constitutional Law in Democratic Transition Process University of Auvergne (Clermont-Ferrand), Editor of the journal La Revue de Justice Constitutionnelle Est-Européenne 11.0511.30 Professor Paul Varul New Private Law Why This and What will Happen Next? Professor of Civil Law, University of Tartu; Editor-in-chief of the journals Juridica and Juridica International Afternoon plenary (Vanemuine Concert Hall) Chairs: Märt Rask, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Priidu Pärna, Member of Presidency, Estonian Lawyers Union 12.0012.25 Professor Valentinas Mikelenas Civil Law and Civil Procedural Law Reforms in Lithuania Professor, University of Vilnius 12.2512.50 Dr.iur. Hannes Veinla Environmental Impact of Development Projects: Economy versus the Environment Docent of Environmental Law, University of Tartu 12.5013.15 Martin Hirvoja Updating Economic Crime Law in Estonia Foundations and Emphases Deputy Secretary General of Criminal Policy, Ministry of Justice 196 JURIDICA INTERNATIONAL XI/2006 XXIX Days of Estonian Jurisprudents First private law section Interpretation and Implementation Problems Related to the Law of Obligations (Vanemuine Concert Hall) Chairs: Professor Paul Varul, Professor of Civil Law, University of Tartu Aivar Pilv, Chairman, Estonian Bar Association 15.0015.20 Mag.iur.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Coalition Formation and the Regime Divide in Central Europe
    Program on Central & Eastern Europe Working Paper Series #52, j\Tovember 1999 Coalition Formation and the Regime Divide in Central Europe Anna Grzymala-Busse· Weatherhead Center for International Affairs Harvard University Cambridge, lvlA 02138 Abstract The study examines the formation of coalitions in East Central Europe after the democratic transi­ tions of 1989. Existing explanations of coalition formations, which focus on either office-seeking and minimum wmning considerations, or on policy-seeking and spatial ideological convergence. However, they fail to account for the coalition patterns in the new democracies of East Central Europe. Instead, these parties' flrst goal is to develop clear and consistent reputations. To that end, they will form coalitions exclusively within the two camps of the regime divide: that is, amongst par­ ties stemming from the former communist parties, and those with roots in the former opposition to the communist regimes. The two corollaries are that defectors are punished at unusually high rates, and the communist party successors seek, rather than are sought for, coalitions. This model explains 85% of the coalitions that formed in the region after 1989. The study then examines the communist successor parties, and how their efforts illustrate these dynamics . • I would like to thank Grzegorz Ekiert, Gary King, Kenneth Shepsle, Michael Tomz, and the participants ofthe Faculty Workshop at Yale University for their helpful comments. 2 I. Introduction The patterns of coalition fonnation in East Central Europe are as diverse as they are puzzling. Since the ability to fonn stable governing coalitions is a basic precondition of effective democratic governance in multi-party parliamentary systems, several explanations have emerged of how political parties fonn such coalitions.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia by Misha Savic
    Serbia by Misha Savic Capital: Belgrade Population: 7.2 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$11,430 Source: The data above are drawn from the World Bank’sWorld Development Indicators 2014. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Electoral Process 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 Civil Society 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.50 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 Independent Media 3.25 3.25 3.50 3.75 3.75 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 National Democratic Governance 4.00 4.00 3.75 4.00 4.00 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 Local Democratic Governance 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 Judicial Framework and Independence 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 Corruption 5.00 4.75 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 Democracy Score 3.75 3.71 3.68 3.79 3.79 3.71 3.64 3.64 3.64 3.64 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s). The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest.
    [Show full text]
  • Transatlantic Cooperation and the Prospects for Dialogue
    Transatlantic Cooperation and the Prospects for Dialogue The Council for Inclusive Governance (CIG) organized on February 26, 2021 a discussion on trans-Atlantic cooperation and the Kosovo-Serbia dialogue for a group of politicians and civil society representatives from Kosovo and Serbia. Two CIG board members, former senior officials in the U.S. Department of State and the European Commission, took part as well. The meeting specifically addressed the effects of expected revitalized transatlantic cooperation now with President Joe Biden in office, the changes in Kosovo after Albin Kurti’s February 14 election victory, and the prospects of the Kosovo-Serbia dialogue in 2021. The following are a number of conclusions and recommendations based either on consensus or broad agreement. They do not necessarily represent the views of CIG and the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs (FDFA), which supports CIG’s initiative on normalization between Kosovo and Serbia. The discussion was held under the Chatham House Rule. Conclusions and recommendations The change of governments in Kosovo and in the US are positive elements for the continuation of the dialogue. However, there are other pressing issues and reluctance both in Belgrade and in Pristina that make it almost impossible for the dialogue to achieve breakthrough this year. • The February 14 election outcome in Kosovo signaled a significant change both at the socio- political level and on the future of the dialogue with Serbia. For the first time since the negotiations with Serbia began in 2011, Kosovo will be represented by a leader who is openly saying that he will not yield to any international pressure to make “damaging agreements or compromises.” “However, this is not a principled position, but rather aimed at gaining personal political benefit,” a speaker, skeptical of Kurti’s stated objectives, said.
    [Show full text]
  • Viticulture in Serbia According to Statistics and Viticulture Zoning
    VITICULTURE IN SERBIA ACCORDING TO STATISTICS AND VITICULTURE ZONING Dragoslav Ivanišević, Darko Jakšić Apstract: After more than 50 years, the Census of Agriculture, conducted in 2012 by Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia, collected data on present situation in agriculture and viticulture. At approximately the same time, after more than 40 years, new geographical zoning of viticulture production areas in Serbia was carried out by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management. In Serbia, the area of about 25000 ha is under vine, out of which 22150 ha is in Central Serbia and Vojvodina. About 75.7% of total area is used for the production of wine grapes and 24.3 % is used for the production of table grapes. Viticulture zoning divides the territory of Serbia into three wine growing units which comprise 22 regions, 77 wine growing districts and a large number of wine growing oases. Advancement and planned development of viticulture can only be achieved if there is awareness of current state of area under vine, knowledge of assortment, seedling age, potentials of some wine making regions and other necessary conditions. Key words: viticulture, census, viticulture zoning Dragoslav Ivanišević, PhD, docent, University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Agriculture, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 8, 21000 Novi Sad, phone: 021 485 35 00, е-mail: [email protected] Darko Jakšić, MSc, graduated engineer, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management, Nemanjina 22-26, 11000 Belgrade, phone: 011 361 69 77, е-mail: [email protected] Introduction Viticulture in Serbia represents a very important branch of agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Level Conference of the Ministries of Justice and of the Interior
    10 November 2006 High-level Conference of the Ministries of Justice and of the Interior “Improving European Co-operation in the Criminal Justice Field” Moscow (Russian Federation) Hotel Marriott 9 − 10 November 2006 (∗) PROVISIONAL LIST OF PARTICIPANTS ∗ States are listed in alphabetical order by their English names. Les Etats sont mentionnés par ordre alphabétique anglais. - 2 - MEMBER STATES ALBANIA Ministry of Justice Mr Aldo BUMÇI, Minister of Justice, TIRANA Mr Arben BRACE, Director, TIRANA Ministry of the Interior Mr Gjergj LEZHJA, Vice-Minister, TIRANA Mr Helidon BEKTESHI, Head of Sector, TIRANA ARMENIA Mr Davit HARUTYUNYAN, Minister of Justice, YEREVAN Mr Anatolih MATEVOSYAN, Deputy Minister of Justice, YEREVAN Mr Hovhannes VARYAN, Deputy Chief of Police, YEREVAN Mr Gevorg VOSKANYAN, Head of the International Co-operation Department of the Police, YEREVAN AUSTRIA Ms Karin GASTINGER, Minister of Justice, VIENNA Ms Barbara GOETH-FLEMMICH, Head of Department, VIENNA Mr Bernhard PUSTER, Member of the Ministers Cabinet, VIENNA Mr Fritz SCHERMANN, Austrian Embassy to the Russian Federation, MOSCOW Mr Michael SCHOEN, Ministry of Justice, VIENNA AZERBAIJAN Ministry of Justice Mr Fikrat MAMMADOV, Minister of Justice, BAKU Mr Adil ABILOV, Assistant Minister of Justice, BAKU Mr Azar JAFAROV, Director, General Department of Organisation and Supervision, BAKU Ministry of the Interior Mr. Ramil USUBOV, Minister of Interior, BAKU Mr. Valentin DJUMAZADE, Deputy Director of International Cooperation Department, BAKU Mr. Bagif SHARIFOV, Plenipotentiary Representative of the Ministry of Interior of Azerbaijan in the Russian Federation, MOSCOW Mr. Ruslan HAGIYEV, Director of the International Relations Department, General Prosecutors Office, BAKU Mr. Nizami SAFAROV, Director of the Department on Administrative and Military Law, Parliament Secretariat, BAKU BELGIUM Ministry of Justice M.
    [Show full text]
  • Advancing Normalization Between Kosovo and Serbia
    ADVANCING NORMALIZATION BETWEEN KOSOVO AND SERBIA ADVANCING NORMALIZATION BETWEEN KOSOVO AND SERBIA Council for Inclusive Governance New York, 2017 Contents 4 Preface and Acknowledgments 7 Comprehensive Normalization 11 Parliamentary Cooperation 22 Serb Integration and Serb Albanian Relations 32 Challenges of Establishing the Association/Community 39 Serbia’s Internal Dialogue on Kosovo © Council for Inclusive Governance 2017 3 PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Almost twenty years after the war in Kosovo, resolution of the Kosovo-Serbia conflict remains a piece of unfinished business in the Balkans. The process is entering a critical stage. An agreement on comprehensive normalization or a peace treaty under which both sides will commit to mutual respect, peaceful co- existence and hopefully cooperation is within reach. Comprehensive normalization with Kosovo is an obligation for Serbia’s accession to the European Union and is also needed by Pristina in order to move forward. It is unclear, however, what is the most efficient way of getting there. It is not clear how to produce a document that will be acceptable to both sides and a document in the spirit of win-win rather than of win-lose. Since 2010, Serbia and Kosovo have been on a quest to normalize their relations. In Brussels, in 2013, their prime ministers reached the first agreement of principles governing normalization of relations. Implementation deadlines were agreed upon as well. However, five years later the agreement remains to be implemented in full, most notably the provisions on establishing the Association/Community of Serb-Majority Municipalities and on energy. Kosovo’s institutions are not fully functioning in Kosovo’s predominantly ethnically Serb north and Serbia’s parallel administrative institutions continue their existence across Kosovo.
    [Show full text]