DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter Three

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter Three chapter three THE HELLENISTIC AGE: AUTOBIOGRAPHY AND POLITICAL STRUGGLES Gabriele Marasco The majority of the autobiographical literature of the Hellenistic epoch consists of the works of the kings, a fact that is well justified by the clear prevalence of the monarchic institution; but, close to the monar- chy of Alexander and to those monarchies generated by the division of his empire, the other forms of government typical of the Greek world also survived, from the tyrannies and the local potentates to the democratic or aristocratic poleis and the federal states. In these generally smaller political realities, the activity of the local politicians persisted, as well as the struggles, the internal contrasts, and the conflicts among the parties, which constituted the stimulus and the subject for the development of writings that drew attention to the actions of their authors. Despite the loss of so great a part of the Hellenistic sources, some important testi- monies of this literary genre have survived and allow us to appraise its development, which seems to have followed in substance the orienta- tion of the fourth century, developing the two fundamental themes of the accounts of travels and the political autobiography. I. Autobiographical Travel Literature and Memoirs: Nearchus The conquests of Alexander widened geographical knowledge enor- mously, and they aroused, already among the participants of the enter- prise, a wide literature that offered accounts of many lands until then unknown. The greatest part of these works confined itself to provid- ing geographical data in a strict sense, such as the description of the countries, the distances, the characteristics of the populations, the fauna and the flora, the economic resources, and the commercial roads. A notable and meaningful exception is constituted nevertheless by the work composed by Nearchus, a native of Crete but a citizen of Macedonian gabriele marasco Amphipolis, who was among the foremost officers of Alexander and, in the summer of , was entrusted by him to drive the fleet in the trip back from the mouths of the Indus, along the coasts of Persia—actually to those of Mesopotamia—where he went up the Tigris to a place near Susa.1 On his return,2 he wrote a report3 that was read to Alexander few days before his death4 and which seems to still have been consulted by Theophrastus;5 then he elaborated it in a work entitled Παρ.πλυς (or 0Αν.πλυς) τς 0Ινδικς,6 which is known from some fragments and, above all, from the ample account of Arrian, who used it as source to narrate the return of Alexander’s fleet from India in his Indiké.7 The opinion according to which Nearchus would have completely obscured his own role8 is entirely to be rejected on the grounds, above all, of the testimony of Arrian. In effect, it is true that the work of Nearchus contains all the elements typical of a periplus, from the notation of the 1 On the career of Nearchus, see H. Berve, Das Alexanderreich auf prosopographischer Grundlage (Munich, ), :, no. ; C.F. Lehmann-Haupt, Nr. : Ναρς,in J. Papastavru, Amphipolis. Geschichte und Prosopographie, Klio,Suppl.N.F.(Leipzig, ), –; G. Wirth, “Nearchos der Flottenchef,”in Acta Conventus XI Eirene (Wro- claw, ), – (= Studien zur Alexandergeschichte [Darmstadt, ], –); A.B. Bosworth, “Nearchus in Susiana,” in Zu Alexander der Grosse. Festschrift G. Wirth (Amsterdam, ), –; G. Wirth, “Nearch, Alexander und die Diadochen. Speku- lationen über einen Zusamenhang,” Tyche (), –. 2 In the spring of . 3 This task had been entrusted to him since the beginning (Arr., Ind. .). 4 Plut., Alex. (= FGrHist Fb). The view of E. Badian (“Nearchus the Cretan,” Yale Class. Stud. [], ), according to which this information, for which Plutarch expressly quotes the royal Ephemerides, would have been inserted in obedience to the will of Nearchus, appears hypercritical, since from one side it exaggerates the influence of the latter in the time of the death of the king, and from the other it denies the particular interest of Alexander in the results of the maritime explorations. On the distinction of that testimony from that in Arr., Anab. .. concerning the expedition along the coasts of Arabia, see L. Pearson, “The Diary and the Letters of Alexander the Great,” Historia (), , . 5 Thphr., Hist. Plant. ... See W.Capelle, s.v. “Nearchos” no. , RE . (), ; P. Högemann, Alexander der Grosse und Arabien (Munich, ), n. 6 The exact title is discussed: see W. Tomaschek, “Topographische Erläuterung der Küstenfahrt Nearchs vom Indus bis zum Euphrat,” Sitzungsber. d. kaiserl. Akad. d. Wiss. Wien (phil.-hist. Kl.) (), Abh. .; Jacoby, FGrHist B, Kommentar, ; P. Pédech, Historiens compagnons d’Alexandre. Callisthène—Onésicrite—Néarque—Ptolé- mée—Aristobule (Paris, ), –. 7 Arr., Ind. – = FGrHist F. Besides the commentary of Jacoby (FGrHist B, Kommentar, –), see the wider and updated one of N. Biffi, L’ Indiké di Arriano, Introduzione, testo, traduzione e commento (Bari, ), –. 8 See W. Capelle, s.v. “Nearchos,” ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 4. Barsine, Daughter of Artabazus
    Alexander’s Lovers by Andrew Chugg 4. Barsine, Daughter of Artabazus Barsine was by birth a minor princess of the Achaemenid Empire of the Persians, for her father, Artabazus, was the son of a Great King’s daughter.197 It is known that his father was Pharnabazus, who had married Apame, the daughter of Artaxerxes II, some time between 392 - 387BC.198 Artabazus was a senior Persian Satrap and courtier and was latterly renowned for his loyalty first to Darius, then to Alexander. Perhaps this was the outcome of a bad experience of the consequences of disloyalty earlier in his long career. In 358BC Artaxerxes III Ochus had upon his accession ordered the western Satraps to disband their mercenary armies, but this edict had eventually edged Artabazus into an unsuccessful revolt. He spent some years in exile at Philip’s court during Alexander’s childhood, starting in about 352BC and extending until around 349BC,199 at which time he became reconciled with the Great King. It is likely that his daughter Barsine and the rest of his immediate family accompanied him in his exile, so it is feasible that Barsine knew Alexander when they were both still children. Plutarch relates that she had received a “Greek upbringing”, though in point of fact this education could just as well have been delivered in Artabazus’ Satrapy of Hellespontine Phrygia, where the population was predominantly ethnically Greek. As a young girl, Barsine appears to have married Mentor,200 a Greek mercenary general from Rhodes. Artabazus had previously married the sister of this Rhodian, so Barsine may have been Mentor’s niece.
    [Show full text]
  • The Successors: Alexander's Legacy
    The Successors: Alexander’s Legacy November 20-22, 2015 Committee Background Guide The Successors: Alexander’s Legacy 1 Table of Contents Committee Director Welcome Letter ...........................................................................................2 Summons to the Babylon Council ................................................................................................3 The History of Macedon and Alexander ......................................................................................4 The Rise of Macedon and the Reign of Philip II ..........................................................................4 The Persian Empire ......................................................................................................................5 The Wars of Alexander ................................................................................................................5 Alexander’s Plans and Death .......................................................................................................7 Key Topics ......................................................................................................................................8 Succession of the Throne .............................................................................................................8 Partition of the Satrapies ............................................................................................................10 Continuity and Governance ........................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander's Successors
    Perdiccas, 323-320 Antigonus (western Asia Minor) 288-285 Antipater (Macedonia) 301, after Ipsus Lysimachus (Anatolia, Thrace) Archon (Babylon) Lysimachus (Anatolia, Thrace) Ptolemy (Egypt) Asander (Caria) Ptolemy (Egypt) Seleucus (Babylonia, N. Syria) Persia to Alexander the Great Atropates (northern Media) 315-311 Alexander’s Seleucus (Babylonia, N. Syria) Eumenes (Cappadocia, Pontus) vs. 318-316 Cassander Cassander (Macedonia) Laomedon (Syria) Lysimachus Daniel 11:1-4 Antigonus Demetrius (Cyprus, Tyre, Demetrius (Macedonia, Cyprus, Leonnatus (Phrygia) Ptolemy Successors Cassander Sidon, Agaean islands) Tyre, Sidon, Agaean islands) Lysimachus (Thrace) Peithon Seleucus Menander (Lydia) Ptolemy Bythinia Bythinia Olympias (Epirus) vs. 332-260 BC Seleucus Epirus Epirus “And now I will tell you the truth. Behold, three more kings are going to arise Peithon (southern Media) Antigonus Greece Greece Philippus (Bactria) vs. Aristodemus Heraclean kingdom Heraclean kingdom Ptolemy (Egypt) Demetrius in Persia. Then a fourth will gain far more riches than all of them; as soon as Eumenes Paeonia Paeonia Stasanor (Aria) Nearchus Olympias Pontus Pontus and others . Peithon Polyperchon Rhodes Rhodes he becomes strong through his riches, he will arouse the whole empire against the realm of Greece. And a mighty king will arise, and he will rule with great authority and do as he pleases.” (Dan 11:2-3) 320 330310 300 290 280 270 260 250 Antipater, 320-319 Alcetas and Attalus (Pisidia ) Antigenes (Susiana) Antigonus (army in Asia) Arrhidaeus (Phrygia) Cassander
    [Show full text]
  • Nearchus of Crete
    Histos 11 (2017) XXIX–XXXV REVIEW–DISCUSSION NEARCHUS OF CRETE Veronica Bucciantini, Studio su Nearco di Creta. Dalla descrizione geografica alla nar- razione storica. Studi di Storia greca e romana, 11. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso, 2015. Pp. 251. Paperback, €18.00. ISBN 978-88-6274-643-4. Note: The Table of Contents of this book appears at the end of the review. hile Nearchus’ fragments have long been commented upon by ex- cellent scholars, the academic community was awaiting a mono- W graph entirely devoted to this exceptional author. The gap has just been filled by Veronica Bucciantini (henceforth B.), who gives a study encom- passing all aspects of Nearchus’ career and personality. This book is a revised version of her doctoral thesis, completed under the supervision of a leading expert in ancient geography, Serena Bianchetti. It does not consist of a new commentary of the extant fragments,1 and B. certainly does not aim at exten- sively addressing and discussing the many complex issues raised by this text: for instance, Nearchus’ ‘scientific’ skills (ch. 3: ‘N. osservatore “scientifico”’) are not studied against the background of fourth-century Greek science and culture. Instead B. provides a convenient synthesis presenting the various as- pects of Nearchus’ life and actions, some of which are more carefully investi- gated than others. B.’s inquiry, mostly based on Arrian’s Indikê, is backed up by an excellent up-to-date bibliography. Her Italian is rather easy to follow. However, the author of the present review, who is not a native speaker, is un- able to detect typos and mistakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Companion Cavalry and the Macedonian Heavy Infantry
    THE ARMY OP ALEXANDER THE GREAT %/ ROBERT LOCK IT'-'-i""*'?.} Submitted to satisfy the requirements for the degree of Ph.D. in the School of History in the University of Leeds. Supervisor: Professor E. Badian Date of Submission: Thursday 14 March 1974 IMAGING SERVICES NORTH X 5 Boston Spa, Wetherby </l *xj 1 West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ. * $ www.bl.uk BEST COPY AVAILABLE. TEXT IN ORIGINAL IS CLOSE TO THE EDGE OF THE PAGE ABSTRACT The army with which Alexander the Great conquered the Persian empire was "built around the Macedonian Companion cavalry and the Macedonian heavy infantry. The Macedonian nobility were traditionally fine horsemen, hut the infantry was poorly armed and badly organised until the reign of Alexander II in 369/8 B.C. This king formed a small royal standing army; it consisted of a cavalry force of Macedonian nobles, which he named the 'hetairoi' (or Companion]! cavalry, and an infantry body drawn from the commoners and trained to fight in phalangite formation: these he called the »pezetairoi» (or foot-companions). Philip II (359-336 B.C.) expanded the kingdom and greatly increased the manpower resources for war. Towards the end of his reign he started preparations for the invasion of the Persian empire and levied many more Macedonians than had hitherto been involved in the king's wars. In order to attach these men more closely to himself he extended the meaning of the terms »hetairol» and 'pezetairoi to refer to the whole bodies of Macedonian cavalry and heavy infantry which served under him on his campaigning.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alexander-Achilles Connection: the Historical Dimension
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Best of the Macedonians: Alexander as Achilles in Arrian, Curtius, and Plutarch Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/76s9x3jv Author Vorhis, Justin Grant Publication Date 2017 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles The Best of the Macedonians: Alexander as Achilles in Arrian, Curtius, and Plutarch A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Classics by Justin Grant Vorhis 2017 © Copyright by Justin Grant Vorhis 2017 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION The Best of the Macedonians: Alexander as Achilles in Arrian, Curtius, and Plutarch by Justin Grant Vorhis Doctor of Philosophy in Classics University of California, Los Angeles, 2017 Professor Kathryn Anne Morgan, Chair This dissertation concerns the connection between Alexander the Great (356-323 B.C.), the famous Macedonian king, and Achilles, the preeminent Greek hero of the Trojan War. As scholars have long recognized, Alexander’s connection to Achilles represents both a historical and a literary phenomenon: Alexander not only portrayed himself as a second Achilles, but was also portrayed as such by those who wrote about him. While scholars have traditionally concentrated on the connection’s historical dimension, I concentrate in this study on its literary dimension (the Achilles motif), taking Arrian, Curtius, and Plutarch, the three extant Alexander historians
    [Show full text]
  • Philia Networks in the Macedonian Court and the Long Accession of Alexander the Great*
    Karanos 3, 2020 59-83 Philia Networks in the Macedonian Court and the Long Accession of Alexander the Great* by Julius Guthrie University of Exeter [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper revaluates key moments in the court politics of Alexander the Great’s reign through the introduction of philia-networks governed by gift-exchange as a template for explaining the relationships between key participants. This approach makes it clear that Alexander initially held a passive role in the political life of his own court and was dependant on others for his succession. These dynamics shifted in the opening years of the Asian expedition as Alexander sought to break these philia- networks, building his own and surrounding his person with philoi of his own choosing. KEYWORDS Alexander the Great, philia, Aristotle, court politics, conspiracies. To be a ruler in the ancient world was to be involved in a never-ending game of political chicanery with the elite. The Argead family of Macedonia, although the ruling house from at least the turn of the sixth into the fifth century, were no exception, and neither was the household’s most famous name: Alexander III the Great.1 Alexander, when his father, Philip II, died in 336 was by no means assured of succession to the Macedonian kingship. That Alexander did succeed was due to his support from prominent men – especially Antipater and Parmenio– who controlled vast networks of philoi. The recognition of the role played by prominent political factions in Alexander’s court is itself nothing new and most recently Waldemar Heckel has argued for the existence of political factions centred on both Antipater and Parmenio at Alexander’s court2.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridging the Hellespont: the Successor Lysimachus - a Study
    BRIDGING THE HELLESPONT: THE SUCCESSOR LYSIMACHUS - A STUDY IN EARLY HELLENISTIC KINGSHIP Helen Sarah Lund PhD University College, London ProQuest Number: 10610063 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10610063 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 ABSTRACT Literary evidence on Lysimachus reveals a series of images which may say more about contemporary or later views on kingship than about the actual man, given the intrusion of bias, conventional motifs and propaganda. Thrace was Lysimachus* legacy from Alexander's empire; though problems posed by its formidable tribes and limited resources excluded him from the Successors' wars for nearly ten years, its position, linking Europe and Asia, afforded him some influence, Lysimachus failed to conquer "all of Thrace", but his settlements there achieved enough stability to allow him thoughts of rule across the Hellespont, in Asia Minor, More ambitious and less cautious than is often thought, Lysimachus' acquisition of empire in Asia Minor, Macedon and Greece from c.315 BC to 284 BC reflects considerable military and diplomatic skills, deployed primarily when self-interest demanded rather than reflecting obligations as a permanent member of an "anti-Antigonid team".
    [Show full text]
  • EUMENES Reigned 197-160? B.C
    75 AD EUMENES Reigned 197-160? B.C. Plutarch translated by John Dryden Plutarch (46-120) - Greek biographer, historian, and philosopher, sometimes known as the encyclopaedist of antiquity. He is most renowned for his series of character studies, arranged mostly in pairs, known as “Plutarch’s Lives of the Noble Grecians and Romans” or “Parallel Lives.” Eumenes (75 AD) - A study of the life of Eumenes, a Greek ruler. EUMENES DURIS reports that Eumenes, the Cardian, was the son of a poor wagoner in the Thracian Chersonesus, yet liberally educated, both as a scholar and a soldier; and that while he was but young, Philip, passing through Cardia, diverted himself with a sight of the wrestling matches and other exercises of the youth of that place, among whom Eumenes performing with success, and showing signs of intelligence and bravery, Philip was so pleased with him as to take him into his service. But they seem to speak more probably who tell us that Philip advanced Eumenes for the friendship he bore to his father, whose guest he had sometime been. After the death of Philip, he continued in the service of Alexander, with the title of his principal secretary, but in as great favour as the most intimate of his familiars, being esteemed as wise and faithful as any person about him, so that he went with troops under his immediate command as general in the expedition against India, and succeeded to the post of Perdiccas, when Perdiccas was advanced to that of Hephaestion, then newly deceased. And therefore, after the death of Alexander, when Neoptolemus, who had been captain of his life-guard, said that he had followed Alexander with shield and spear, but Eumenes only with pen and paper, the Macedonians laughed at him, as knowing very well that, besides other marks of favour, the king had done him the honour to make him a kind of kinsman to himself by marriage.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 14 Alexander's Invasion of the Northwest*
    UNIT 14 ALEXANDER’S INVASION OF THE Janapadas and Mahajanapadas NORTHWEST* Structure 14.0 Objectives 14.1 Introduction 14.2 Sources 14.3 Alexander of Macedonia 14.4 Arrian’s Indike 14.5 Alexander’s Successors and Seleucus Nicator 14.6 Impact of Alexander’s Invasion 14.7 Summary 14.8 Key Words 14.9 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises 14.10 Suggested Readings 14.0 OBJECTIVES In this Unit, you will know about: Alexander’s invasion of the north-western India; The different sources about Alexander and their significance; Alexander’s battle with various principalities of India including Porus; Arrian’s Indike; The impact of Alexander’s invasion on India; and Megasthenes, who was a Greek ambassador to Chandragupta Maurya’s court. 14.1 INTRODUCTION In the previous Unit you learnt about the Janapadas and Mahajanapadas which emerged in northern India in the sixth century BCE. In this unit we will focus on the north-western region of the Indian subcontinent and learn how it became a vibrant seat of activity due to events related to Alexander’s invasion in the fourth century BCE. 14.2 SOURCES The period of Alexander is well attested by a number of sources. At first instance, these sources seem impressive and remarkable. There are full length histories of the reign by Arrian and Curtius Rufus, a formal biography by Plutarch, a whole book of Diodorus Sirculus’ Bibliotheca, and substantial passages in the later books of Strabo’s Geography. However, despite giving an impression of being substantial, their value as primary sources is put to question as they are all late.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Roisman
    -j I a Joseph Roisman ALEXANDER S VETERANS AND THE EARLY WARS OF THE SUCCESSORS JN 71019 The Fordyce W. Mitchel Memorial Lecture Se ries, sponsored by the Department of History at the University of Missouri-Columbia, began in October 2000. Fordyce Mitchel was Professor of Greek History at the University of Missouri Columbia until his death in 1986. In addition to his work on fourth-century Greek history and epigraphy, including his much-cited Lykourgan Athens: 338-322, Semple Lectures 2 (Cincinnati, 1970), Mitchel helped to elevate the ancient his tory program in the Department of History and to build the extensive library resources in that field. The lecture series was made possible by a generous endowment from his widow, Mrs. Marguerite Mitchel. It provides for a biennial series of lectures on original aspects of Greek history and society, given by a scholar of high international standing. The lectures are then revised and arc currently published by the University of Texas Press. PREVIOUS MITCHEL PUBLICATIONS: Carol G. Thomas, Finding People in Early Greece (University of Missouri Press, 2005) Mogens Herman Hansen, The Shotgun Method: The Demography of the Ancient Greek City-State Culture (University of Missouri Press, 2006) Mark Golden, Greek Sport and Social Status (University of Texas Press, 2008) ALEXANDER S VETERANS AND THE EARLY WARS OF THE SUCCESSORS by Joseph Roisman JLCU1 0 5203 dve UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS PRESS, AUSTIN Copyright 2012 by the University of Texas Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America First edition, 2012 Requests for permission to reproduce material from this work should be sent to: Permissions University of Texas Press P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander the Great (17)
    Alexander the Great (17) Alexander the Great (*356; r. 336-323): the Macedonian king who defeated his Persian colleague Darius III Codomannus and conquered the Achaemenid Empire. During his campaigns, Alexander visited a.o. Egypt, Babylonia, Persis, Media, Bactria, the Punjab, and the valley of the Indus. In the second half of his reign, he had to find a way to rule his newly conquered countries. Therefore, he made Babylon his capital and introduced the oriental court ceremonial, which caused great tensions with his Macedonian and Greek officers. This is the seventeenth of a series of articles. A complete overview can be found here and a chronological table of his reign can be found here. The purple testament of bleeding war The settlement of Babylon Alexander died in the afternoon of 11 June 323 BCE. Next day, his generals met to discuss the new situation. Under normal circumstances, they, as representatives of the Macedonian nation in arms, were to choose a new king. This could be easy, because the dead king had a brother, Arridaeus. However, he was considered mentally unfit to rule. As a consequence, it was difficult to reach a solution. According to Quintus Curtius Rufus, Perdiccas, the commander of the Companion cavalry who had been appointed by Alexander as his successor, said that it was best to wait until Roxane, who was pregnant, had given birth. If it were a son, it would be logical to chose him as the new king. This was all too transparent: Perdiccas wanted to be in sole command until the boy had grown up.
    [Show full text]