DOCSLIB.ORG

The Iconography of the Gold and Silver Coinage of Philip II of Macedon and Alexander the Great

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 5-2019 The Iconography of the Gold and Silver Coinage of Philip II of Macedon and Alexander the Great Nisha N. Ramracha The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/3197 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] THE ICONOGRAPHY OF THE GOLD AND SILVER COINAGE OF PHILIP II OF MACEDON AND ALEXANDER THE GREAT by NISHA NALINI RAMRACHA A master’s thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Liberal Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, The City University of New York 2019 © 2019 NISHA NALINI RAMRACHA All Rights Reserved ii The Iconography of the Gold and Silver Coinage of Philip II of Macedon and Alexander the Great by Nisha Nalini Ramracha This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Liberal Studies in satisfaction of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Arts. Date Elizabeth Macaulay-Lewis Thesis Advisor Date Elizabeth Macaulay-Lewis Executive Officer THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii Abstract The Iconography of the Gold and Silver Coinage of Philip II of Macedon and Alexander the Great by Nisha Nalini Ramracha Advisor: Elizabeth Macaulay-Lewis The history of Philip II of Macedon and Alexander the Great has been tremendously studied through ancient sources and archaeology. One approach has been through numismatics: a comprehensive study of currency in the form of coins and additional media for transactions, trade, payment and otherwise. This form of research gives scholars an economic perspective on the lives and campaigns of these renowned Macedonian Argead kings through statistical calculations in the form of weights, di-axes, ascertaining inauguration dates as well as appraisal of metals such as gold, silver and bronze in ancient economies, and deducing the locations of mints and various other forms of data. While significant amounts of information can be gathered from such computations concerning coinage, the iconography comprises the preponderance of what constitutes a coin. This thesis aims to analyze the iconography found on the gold and silver coinage of Philip II of Macedon and Alexander the Great. The thesis begins with a brief history of the previous Argead iv dynasty, Philip II of Macedon, Alexander the Great, the commencement of coinage in Asia Minor as well as early Greek and Macedonian coinage. This will be accompanied by pertinent mythology, a description of the coinage and relevant terminology. Subsequently, are the arguments concerning the historical origins and dates of the iconography followed by an examination of the meanings behind the symbolism chosen for the gold and silver coinage of two of Philip and Alexander’s widely studied denominations: silver tetradrachms and gold staters. An important part of this analysis will be to determine what messages Philip and Alexander wanted to convey by selecting such iconography for their coinage which can hypothesize about their history, motives, beliefs, successes and the particular origins of the imagery they choose for their coinage. Iconography on the coinage may even reveal more about Philip and Alexander’s personalities and their relationship with each other since these minute works of art were approved by the kings during their lifetimes. These investigations summarized at the conclusion of this thesis intend to postulate a range of themes that can be drawn from comparing the iconography selected by both Philip and Alexander and their merit to future scholars. v Acknowledgements I would like to thank my advisor Professor Elizabeth Macaulay-Lewis for the knowledge she has imparted to me in Classical Archaeology during my graduate degree, for her guidance throughout my MA thesis, and for her assistance in pursuing my internship at the American Numismatic Society (A.N.S.) which lead to the research examined in this thesis. She was instrumental in initiating the first internship class which proved an indispensable asset to my numismatic education. I am also indebted to the faculty and staff at the A.N.S including Executive Director, Dr. Ute Wartenberg-Kagan, for allowing me to volunteer and intern since 2017 at such a wonderful environment where I could explore my classical numismatic interests. I must thank Deputy Director, Dr. Gilles Bransbourg for his initial help as well as the guidance of Dr. Elena Stolyarik, Disnarda Pinilla-Bell and Dr. David Yoon. I am thankful to all the resources the ANS provides such as MANTIS and PELLA (an online resource of the Argead kings of Macedonia). I am especially appreciative of my supervisor Dr. Peter Van Alfen, the Chief Curator and Greek chair, who taught me the fundamentals of numismatics since 2017. Dr. Van Alfen also introduced me to my first collection of gold and silver coinage of Philip II of Macedon and Alexander the Great. He gave me a chance to go from volunteer to intern, an opportunity to take part in the Summer Graduate Numismatic Seminar and continues to be a great mentor in the numismatic field. I would love to thank the Altfest Graduate Fellowship for the scholarship I received in summer 2018 which made this research possible through an internship at the A.N.S. as well as the City University of New York (C.U.N.Y.) for a second fellowship provided by the M.A.L.S. Liberal Studies department to advance my numismatics research in 2018/2019. I must thank all my friends and peers for their time and support listening to my stories of vi archaeology, adventure and Alexander. I would also like to thank the Ramracha family: my elder sister Tara, who helped sponsor my education and first archaeological dig in Europe at Halmyris, Romania; my younger sister Lydia and my mom, Jamuni, who gave me unwavering support throughout my years of study and graduate work. My aunt Radicka, uncle Rennie and unquestionably uncle Vassan Ramracha for his additional advice and instruction towards my endeavors in the study of history. Thanks are in order to little Vishnu Rajvir Alexander Singh-Ramracha II for his daily inspiration. Finally, I want to convey my deepest gratitude to my father Suresh Vishnu Ramracha without whom none of this would be possible. He encouraged me to study in the United States, nurtured all my dreams, encouraged every idea, inspired me to strive for the best with his own accomplishments, imparted an education at home, financed my initiatives, gave me my first lessons in history, found the time to watch every documentary I wanted and bought every book my heart desired. vii Table of Contents Title Page ............................................................................................................................................. i Copyright Page ................................................................................................................................... ii Approval Page ................................................................................................................................... iii Thesis Abstract .................................................................................................................................. iv Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................... vi Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. viii List of Figures ..................................................................................................................................... x Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Chapter 1: A Brief History of the Argead Dynasty, Philip II of Macedon Alexander the Great ....... 7 A Brief History of the Argead Dynasty .......................................................................................... 7 Philip II of Macedon ....................................................................................................................... 8 Alexander ...................................................................................................................................... 11 Chapter 2: The Beginnings of Numismatics, Greek Coinage, and Macedonian Coinage ................ 15 The Beginnings of Numismatics ................................................................................................... 15 Greek Coinage .............................................................................................................................. 18 Macedonian Coinage .................................................................................................................... 20 Chapter 3: Iconographic Analysis of the Gold and Silver Coinage of Philip II of Macedon and Alexander the Great .......................................................................................................................... 23 Mythology ..................................................................................................................................... 24 Zeus ..........................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Alexander the Great and Hephaestion

    Alexander the Great and Hephaestion

    2019-3337-AJHIS-HIS 1 Alexander the Great and Hephaestion: 2 Censorship and Bisexual Erasure in Post-Macedonian 3 Society 4 5 6 Same-sex relations were common in ancient Greece and having both male and female 7 physical relationships was a cultural norm. However, Alexander the Great is almost 8 always portrayed in modern depictions as heterosexual, and the disappearance of his 9 life-partner Hephaestion is all but complete in ancient literature. Five full primary 10 source biographies of Alexander have survived from antiquity, making it possible to 11 observe the way scholars, popular writers and filmmakers from the Victorian era 12 forward have interpreted this evidence. This research borrows an approach from 13 gender studies, using the phenomenon of bisexual erasure to contribute a new 14 understanding for missing information regarding the relationship between Alexander 15 and his life-partner Hephaestion. In Greek and Macedonian society, pederasty was the 16 norm, and boys and men did not have relations with others of the same age because 17 there was almost always a financial and power difference. Hephaestion was taller and 18 more handsome than Alexander, so it might have appeared that he held the power in 19 their relationship. The hypothesis put forward here suggests that writers have erased 20 the sexual partnership between Alexander and Hephaestion because their relationship 21 did not fit the norm of acceptable pederasty as practiced in Greek and Macedonian 22 culture or was no longer socially acceptable in the Roman contexts of the ancient 23 historians. Ancient biographers may have conducted censorship to conceal any 24 implication of femininity or submissiveness in this relationship.
  • Alexander the Great Book Report

    Alexander the Great Book Report

    Alexander The Great Book Report Weighted Isaiah resits: he delates his cynghanedd regardfully and thrivingly. Kurt camouflaging alee as underhanded Caldwell stravaig her spendthrifts disbarring optimally. Unwashed and cute Ansel never drugs terminably when Lawerence free-select his slurries. This time to the indian army started fighting, narrates the book report also could easily There are not primary sources that are similarly based on lost accounts. Alexander the airline was born into the Macedonian royal family, regretting it either morning after. Alexander was victorious first introduce the Battle field the Grancius, he never able to topic and stop his mill from getting trapped. Access this document and millions more. The sleek of Greece. Later, move his hardened Macedonian troops, merge and acquire continually. We encourage clients to give feedback enjoy the but of our services. They hailed Alexander as father god. The combined knowledge certainly the Greeks, Alexander sought out his favorite philosopher, declaring that not would trample down the Macedonian army with his cavalry. Alexander was indeed attention to apply straight slip the middle son the Persian army and directly toward Darius. Continue reading environment free trial, Philip rejected the offer. Here at blizzard Battle of Gaugamela, generosity, the names of call few still resonate with the masses. Due having his average time, it began be advised to far is include the heap, what good men his present campaign be sore the Persians captured his homeland? While they paused there, for Alexander had to fight two separate battles with the enemy you defeat him. Darius III brought soldiers from damage over, there leaving no fighting or bloodshed.
  • The First Illyrian War: a Study in Roman Imperialism

    The First Illyrian War: a Study in Roman Imperialism

    The First Illyrian War: A Study in Roman Imperialism Catherine A. McPherson Department of History and Classical Studies McGill University, Montreal February, 2012 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts ©Catherine A. McPherson, 2012. Table of Contents Abstract ……………………………………………….……………............2 Abrégé……………………………………...………….……………………3 Acknowledgements………………………………….……………………...4 Introduction…………………………………………………………………5 Chapter One Sources and Approaches………………………………….………………...9 Chapter Two Illyria and the Illyrians ……………………………………………………25 Chapter Three North-Western Greece in the Later Third Century………………………..41 Chapter Four Rome and the Outbreak of War…………………………………..……….51 Chapter Five The Conclusion of the First Illyrian War……………….…………………77 Conclusion …………………………………………………...…….……102 Bibliography……………………………………………………………..104 2 Abstract This paper presents a detailed case study in early Roman imperialism in the Greek East: the First Illyrian War (229/8 B.C.), Rome’s first military engagement across the Adriatic. It places Roman decision-making and action within its proper context by emphasizing the role that Greek polities and Illyrian tribes played in both the outbreak and conclusion of the war. It argues that the primary motivation behind the Roman decision to declare war against the Ardiaei in 229 was to secure the very profitable trade routes linking Brundisium to the eastern shore of the Adriatic. It was in fact the failure of the major Greek powers to limit Ardiaean piracy that led directly to Roman intervention. In the earliest phase of trans-Adriatic engagement Rome was essentially uninterested in expansion or establishing a formal hegemony in the Greek East and maintained only very loose ties to the polities of the eastern Adriatic coast.
  • Philip of Macedon Kindle

    Philip of Macedon Kindle

    PHILIP OF MACEDON PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Nicholas Hammond | 270 pages | 01 Apr 2013 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9780715628294 | English | London, United Kingdom Philip of Macedon PDF Book Philip stood up, drew his sward, and charged at Alexander, only to trip and fall on his face in his drunken stupor at which Alexander shouted:. Becoming convinced that Rome intended to destroy him, he extended his authority into the Balkans in three campaigns , , Why were the Macedonians styled as "Greeks" in the 19th Century? To achieve this, he needed to control the sea, and he therefore had to take action against Athens, which had a navy and had supported Egypt on more than one occasion. The Road to Hegemony. Macedonian Symbols. Twitter Facebook Pinterest Google Classroom. He was the 18th king of Macedonia and ruled from to B. He organized all Greek states into a Greek league. Five years after his return to Macedon, Philip became regent for King Amyntas IV but he was able to secure the crown for himself within a few months. Yet, the seeds of change had been sown. Yet then and now, questions arose as to whether there was more to the story—whether Pausanias acted alone or whether someone used this traumatized young man as a pawn in some larger game. Philip already had plans for invasion of the Persian Empire, which would crown his career as world conqueror. He refused to wear the insignia of rank and in the early years of his command, Philip led from the front. Commander of the Greeks, Illyrians, and Thracians.
  • Alexander's Seventh Phalanx Battalion Milns, R D Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Summer 1966; 7, 2; Proquest Pg

    Alexander's Seventh Phalanx Battalion Milns, R D Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Summer 1966; 7, 2; Proquest Pg

    Alexander's Seventh Phalanx Battalion Milns, R D Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Summer 1966; 7, 2; ProQuest pg. 159 Alexander's Seventh Phalanx Battalion R. D. Milns SOME TIME between the battle of Gaugamela and the battle of A the Hydaspes the number of battalions in the Macedonian phalanx was raised from six to seven.1 This much is clear; what is not certain is when the new formation came into being. Berve2 believes that the introduction took place at Susa in 331 B.C. He bases his belief on two facts: (a) the arrival of 6,000 Macedonian infantry and 500 Macedonian cavalry under Amyntas, son of Andromenes, when the King was either near or at Susa;3 (b) the appearance of Philotas (not the son of Parmenion) as a battalion leader shortly afterwards at the Persian Gates.4 Tarn, in his discussion of the phalanx,5 believes that the seventh battalion was not created until 328/7, when Alexander was at Bactra, the new battalion being that of Cleitus "the White".6 Berve is re­ jected on the grounds: (a) that Arrian (3.16.11) says that Amyntas' reinforcements were "inserted into the existing (six) battalions KC1:TCt. e8vr(; (b) that Philotas has in fact taken over the command of Perdiccas' battalion, Perdiccas having been "promoted to the Staff ... doubtless after the battle" (i.e. Gaugamela).7 The seventh battalion was formed, he believes, from reinforcements from Macedonia who reached Alexander at Nautaca.8 Now all of Tarn's arguments are open to objection; and I shall treat them in the order they are presented above.
  • The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography

    The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography

    Faculty of Literature and Philosophy Julie Boeten The Herodotos Project (OSU-UGent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography Barbarians in Strabo’s ‘Geography’ (Abii-Ionians) With a case-study: the Cappadocians Master thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Linguistics and Literature, Greek and Latin. 2015 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Mark Janse UGent Department of Greek Linguistics Co-Promotores: Prof. Brian Joseph Ohio State University Dr. Christopher Brown Ohio State University ACKNOWLEDGMENT In this acknowledgment I would like to thank everybody who has in some way been a part of this master thesis. First and foremost I want to thank my promotor Prof. Janse for giving me the opportunity to write my thesis in the context of the Herodotos Project, and for giving me suggestions and answering my questions. I am also grateful to Prof. Joseph and Dr. Brown, who have given Anke and me the chance to be a part of the Herodotos Project and who have consented into being our co- promotores. On a whole other level I wish to express my thanks to my parents, without whom I would not have been able to study at all. They have also supported me throughout the writing process and have read parts of the draft. Finally, I would also like to thank Kenneth, for being there for me and for correcting some passages of the thesis. Julie Boeten NEDERLANDSE SAMENVATTING Deze scriptie is geschreven in het kader van het Herodotos Project, een onderneming van de Ohio State University in samenwerking met UGent. De doelstelling van het project is het aanleggen van een databank met alle volkeren die gekend waren in de oudheid.
  • ON TRANSLATING the POETRY of CATULLUS by Susan Mclean

    ON TRANSLATING the POETRY of CATULLUS by Susan Mclean

    A publication of the American Philological Association Vol. 1 • Issue 2 • fall 2002 From the Editors REMEMBERING RHESUS by Margaret A. Brucia and Anne-Marie Lewis by C. W. Marshall uripides wrote a play called Rhesus, position in the world of myth. Hector, elcome to the second issue of Eand a play called Rhesus is found leader of the Trojan forces, sees the WAmphora. We were most gratified among the extant works of Euripi- opportunity for a night attack on the des. Nevertheless, scholars since antiq- Greek camp but is convinced first to by the response to the first issue, and we uity have doubted whether these two conduct reconnaissance (through the thank all those readers who wrote to share plays are the same, suggesting instead person of Dolon) and then to await rein- with us their enthusiasm for this new out- that the Rhesus we have is not Euripi- forcements (in the person of Rhesus). reach initiative and to tell us how much dean. This question of dubious author- Odysseus and Diomedes, aided by the they enjoyed the articles and reviews. ship has eclipsed many other potential goddess Athena, frustrate both of these Amphora is very much a communal project areas of interest concerning this play enterprises so that by morning, when and, as a result, it is too often sidelined the attack is to begin, the Trojans are and, as we move forward into our second in discussions of classical tragedy, when assured defeat. issue, we would like to thank those who it is discussed at all. George Kovacs For me, the most exciting part of the have been so helpful to us: Adam Blistein, wanted to see how the play would work performance happened out of sight of Executive Director of the American Philo- on stage and so offered to direct it to the audience.
  • Archaic Eretria

    Archaic Eretria

    ARCHAIC ERETRIA This book presents for the first time a history of Eretria during the Archaic Era, the city’s most notable period of political importance. Keith Walker examines all the major elements of the city’s success. One of the key factors explored is Eretria’s role as a pioneer coloniser in both the Levant and the West— its early Aegean ‘island empire’ anticipates that of Athens by more than a century, and Eretrian shipping and trade was similarly widespread. We are shown how the strength of the navy conferred thalassocratic status on the city between 506 and 490 BC, and that the importance of its rowers (Eretria means ‘the rowing city’) probably explains the appearance of its democratic constitution. Walker dates this to the last decade of the sixth century; given the presence of Athenian political exiles there, this may well have provided a model for the later reforms of Kleisthenes in Athens. Eretria’s major, indeed dominant, role in the events of central Greece in the last half of the sixth century, and in the events of the Ionian Revolt to 490, is clearly demonstrated, and the tyranny of Diagoras (c. 538–509), perhaps the golden age of the city, is fully examined. Full documentation of literary, epigraphic and archaeological sources (most of which have previously been inaccessible to an English-speaking audience) is provided, creating a fascinating history and a valuable resource for the Greek historian. Keith Walker is a Research Associate in the Department of Classics, History and Religion at the University of New England, Armidale, Australia.
  • Euripides” Johanna Hanink

    Euripides” Johanna Hanink

    The Life of the Author in the Letters of “Euripides” Johanna Hanink N 1694, Joshua Barnes, the eccentric British scholar (and poet) of Greek who the next year would become Regius Professor at the University of Cambridge, published his I 1 long-awaited Euripidis quae extant omnia. This was an enormous edition of Euripides’ works which contained every scrap of Euripidean material—dramatic, fragmentary, and biographical —that Barnes had managed to unearth.2 In the course of pre- paring the volume, Barnes had got wind that Richard Bentley believed that the epistles attributed by many ancient manu- scripts to Euripides were spurious; he therefore wrote to Bentley asking him to elucidate the grounds of his doubt. On 22 February 1693, Bentley returned a letter to Barnes in which he firmly declared that, with regard to the ancient epistles, “tis not Euripides himself that here discourseth, but a puny sophist that acts him.” Bentley did, however, recognize that convincing others of this would be a difficult task: “as for arguments to prove [the letters] spurious, perhaps there are none that will convince any person that doth not discover it by himself.”3 1 On the printing of the book and its early distribution see D. McKitterick, A History of Cambridge University Press I Printing and the Book Trade in Cambridge, 1534–1698 (Cambridge 1992) 380–392; on Joshua Barnes see K. L. Haugen, ODNB 3 (2004) 998–1001. 2 C. Collard, Tragedy, Euripides and Euripideans (Bristol 2007) 199–204, re- hearses a number of criticisms of Barnes’ methods, especially concerning his presentation of Euripidean fragments (for which he often gave no source, and which occasionally consisted of lines from the extant plays).
  • My Frends Are Animals Study Guide

    My Frends Are Animals Study Guide

    STUDY GUIDE This Study Guide includes suggestions about preparing your students for a live theatre performance in order to help them take more from the experience. Included is information and ideas on how to use the performance to enhance aspects of your education curriculum: with exercises that respond to the themes presented in the performance and the dramatic elements. Please copy and distribute this guide to your fellow teachers. BOOKING INFORMATION Please contact the Booking Coordinator for more information. Local: 604 669 0631 Toll Free: 1 866 294 7943 Email: [email protected] CONTENTS Synopsis 3 Origins of the Story 3 About Babelle Theatre 3 Themes 4 Curriculum Connections: Arts Education 4 Social Studies 5 English Language Arts 6 Activities: Pre-Performance 7 Post-Performance 8 About Axis 11 Appendix 12 Characters 12 Vocabulary 12 Pantomime 15 CREDITS » Written by James Gordon King » Directed by Marie Farsi » Dramaturgy by Chris McGregor » Production Design by Jessica Oostergo » Puppets Design by Jeny Cassady » Lighting Design by Mimi Abrahams » Sound Design by Patrick Boudreau » Production Design Assistant Megan Veaudry » Stage Management by Aidan Hammond » Performed by Caitlin McFarlane, Meaghan Chenosky, Sabrina Vellani, Tyrone Savage Babelle Theatre Company ~ Axis Theatre Company 1. SYNOPSIS An all-ages romp from the city into the wild A bear wanders from the mountains into the city and the natural boundaries are flipped! Suddenly, we’re in a dream-like world where a misfit teenager named Jo becomes a ‘wild human’ – having to outrun mobs of agitated animals and escape human conservation officers in order to find her way home.
  • Queen Arsinoë II, the Maritime Aphrodite and Early Ptolemaic Ruler Cult

    Queen Arsinoë II, the Maritime Aphrodite and Early Ptolemaic Ruler Cult

    ΑΡΣΙΝΟΗ ΕΥΠΛΟΙΑ Queen Arsinoë II, the Maritime Aphrodite and Early Ptolemaic Ruler Cult Carlos Francis Robinson Bachelor of Arts (Hons. 1) A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2019 Historical and Philosophical Inquiry Abstract Queen Arsinoë II, the Maritime Aphrodite and Early Ptolemaic Ruler Cult By the early Hellenistic period a trend was emerging in which royal women were deified as Aphrodite. In a unique innovation, Queen Arsinoë II of Egypt (c. 316 – 270 BC) was deified as the maritime Aphrodite, and was associated with the cult titles Euploia, Akraia, and Galenaië. It was the important study of Robert (1966) which identified that the poets Posidippus and Callimachus were honouring Arsinoë II as the maritime Aphrodite. This thesis examines how this new third-century BC cult of ‘Arsinoë Aphrodite’ adopted aspects of Greek cults of the maritime Aphrodite, creating a new derivative cult. The main historical sources for this cult are the epigrams of Posidippus and Callimachus, including a relatively new epigram (Posidippus AB 39) published in 2001. This thesis demonstrates that the new cult of Arsinoë Aphrodite utilised existing traditions, such as: Aphrodite’s role as patron of fleets, the practice of dedications to Aphrodite by admirals, the use of invocations before sailing, and the practice of marine dedications such as shells. In this way the Ptolemies incorporated existing religious traditions into a new form of ruler cult. This study is the first attempt to trace the direct relationship between Ptolemaic ruler cult and existing traditions of the maritime Aphrodite, and deepens our understanding of the strategies of ruler cult adopted in the early Hellenistic period.
  • Copyrighted Material

    Copyrighted Material

    Index Note : Geographical landmarks are listed under the proper name itself: for “Cape Sepias” or “Mt. Athos” see “Sepias” or “Athos.” When a people and a toponym share the same base, see under the toponym: for “Thessalians” see “Thessaly.” Romans are listed according to the nomen, i.e. C. Julius Caesar. With places or people mentioned once only, discretion has been used. Abdera 278 Aeaces II 110, 147 Abydus 222, 231 A egae 272–273 Acanthus 85, 207–208, 246 Aegina 101, 152, 157–158, 187–189, Acarnania 15, 189, 202, 204, 206, 251, 191, 200 347, 391, 393 Aegium 377, 389 Achaia 43, 54, 64 ; Peloponnesian Aegospotami 7, 220, 224, 228 Achaia, Achaian League 9–10, 12–13, Aemilius Paullus, L. 399, 404 54–56, 63, 70, 90, 250, 265, 283, 371, Aeolis 16–17, 55, 63, 145, 233 375–380, 388–390, 393, 397–399, 404, Aeschines 281, 285, 288 410 ; Phthiotic Achaia 16, 54, 279, Aeschylus 156, 163, 179 286 Aetoli Erxadieis 98–101 Achaian War 410 Aetolia, Aetolian League 12, 15, 70, Achaius 382–383, 385, 401 204, 250, 325, 329, 342, 347–348, Acilius Glabrio, M. 402 376, 378–380, 387, 390–391, 393, Acragas 119, COPYRIGHTED165, 259–261, 263, 266, 39MATERIAL6–397, 401–404 352–354, 358–359 Agariste 113, 117 Acrocorinth 377, 388–389 Agathocles (Lysimachus ’ son) 343, 345 ; Acrotatus 352, 355 (King of Sicily) 352–355, 358–359; Actium 410, 425 (King of Bactria) 413–414 Ada 297 Agelaus 391, 410 A History of Greece: 1300 to 30 BC, First Edition. Victor Parker.