DOCSLIB.ORG

TERMPOL 3.9 – SHIP SPECIFICATIONS Trans Mountain Expansion Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

TERMPOL 3.9 – SHIP SPECIFICATIONS Trans Mountain Expansion Project Prepared for: Prepared by: 777 W. Broadway, Suite 301 Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4J7 November 26, 2013 Termpol 3.9 – Ship Specifications TRANS MOUNTAIN EXPANSION PROJECT November 26, 2013 M&N Project No. 7773 Prepared by: Reviewed by: MOFFATT & NICHOL MOFFATT & NICHOL James Traber, EIT. Ron Byres, P.Eng. Staff Engineer Senior Project Manager Revision Purpose of Issue Date Author Reviewed Approved 0 For TRC Review November 26, 2013 JT RB Trans Mountain Expansion Project November 26, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 CONTEXT ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 VESSEL OWNERSHIP AND LIABILITY ..................................................................................................................... 2 2. SHIP PARTICULARS AND CHARACTERISTICS ....................................................................................................... 3 2.1 GENERAL TANKER DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 DOUBLE HULLS .................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 MACHINERY ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 2.4 INERT GAS SYSTEM .............................................................................................................................................. 5 2.5 SEGREGATED BALLAST ........................................................................................................................................ 5 2.6 ELECTRONICS ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.7 FIRE PREVENTION, FIRE FIGHTING SYSTEMS AND EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT ..................................................... 7 2.8 OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS ....................................................................................................................... 8 2.9 GEOMETRICAL CHARACTERISTICS ....................................................................................................................... 8 2.10 CARGO SYSTEM AND OPERATIONS ................................................................................................................. 11 2.11 CARGO TANK CONFIGURATIONS ..................................................................................................................... 12 2.12 ADDITIONAL PARTICULARS AND CHARACTERISTICS ....................................................................................... 13 3. TANKER VETTING ............................................................................................................................................. 15 3.1 RIGHT TO REJECT VESSEL ................................................................................................................................... 15 3.2 TANKER ACCEPTANCE ....................................................................................................................................... 15 3.2.1 Tanker Pre-Screening for Scheduling Purposes ......................................................................................... 16 3.2.2 Tanker Physical Inspection ........................................................................................................................ 17 3.3 INTERNATIONAL SAFETY MANAGEMENT CODE (ISM CODE) ............................................................................. 17 3.4 ADDITIONAL VESSEL VETTING ........................................................................................................................... 17 4. TERMINAL REGULATIONS FOR VESSEL ACCEPTANCE ........................................................................................ 19 4.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS................................................................................................................................. 19 4.2 VESSEL AGE REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................................................. 19 4.3 VESSEL CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS ......................................................................................................... 19 4.4 VESSEL EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................................... 20 4.5 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE .............................................................................................................................. 20 4.6 TECHNICAL AND OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS .............................................................................................. 21 4.7 CREW QUALIFICATIONS AND CONDUCT REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................. 22 4.8 LOCAL OPERATING REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................................................. 22 5. REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................................................... 23 APPENDIX A: VESSEL SPECIFICATION DATABASE ................................................................................................. 24 (a) Aframax – Double hulls only ...................................................................................................................................... 25 (b) Panamax – Double hulls only ..................................................................................................................................... 25 Termpol 3.9: Ship Specifications i Trans Mountain Expansion Project November 26, 2013 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1: Typical Panamax Class Tanker 74,500 DWT Antipolis (MarineTraffic.com) ................................................ 1 Figure 1-2: Typical Aframax Class Tanker 110,300 DWT Mare Nostrum (MarineTraffic.com) ...................................... 2 Figure 2-1: Typical Tanker Layout .................................................................................................................................. 3 Figure 2-2: Double Hull Tanker Design .......................................................................................................................... 4 Figure 2-3: General Configuration of Tanker (Shipyard Brodosplit) ............................................................................ 11 Figure 2-4: Schematic Tank Configuration - Longitudinal Oil Tight Bulkhead Source: www.teekay.com ................... 13 LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1: Maximum Design Vessel ............................................................................................................................... 8 Table 2-2: Minimum Design Vessel ............................................................................................................................... 9 Table 2-3: Classification Societies ................................................................................................................................ 14 Table A-1: Aframax Vessel Characteristics .................................................................................................................. 25 Table A-2: Panamax Vessel Characteristics ................................................................................................................. 25 Termpol 3.9: Ship Specifications ii Trans Mountain Expansion Project November 26, 2013 1. OBJECTIVES In accordance with the Termpol Review Process (TRP) Guidelines, TP743E 2001, the objective of this study is “to determine the suitability of the design ship, or when applicable, design ships, selected by the proponent.” 1.1 CONTEXT The design vessels expected to berth at the Westridge Terminal are Panamax class (approximately 60,000 to 80,000 Deadweight Tons, or DWT) and Aframax class (approximately 80,000 to 120,000 DWT). Figure 1-1 and Figure 1-2 below show typical Panamax and Aframax vessels respectively. Trans Mountain will not own or charter the vessels berthing at the terminal, however as the terminal operator Trans Mountain enforces a vessel acceptance criteria and vessel vetting process to ensure vessels calling at the terminal are suitable. The vetting process is described in further detail in Sections 3 and 4 below. Figure 1-1: Typical Panamax Class Tanker 74,500 DWT Antipolis (MarineTraffic.com) Termpol 3.9: Ship Specifications 1 Trans Mountain Expansion Project November 26, 2013 Figure 1-2: Typical Aframax Class Tanker 110,300 DWT Mare Nostrum (MarineTraffic.com) 1.2 VESSEL OWNERSHIP AND LIABILITY Vessels calling at Westridge terminal will typically be hired or chartered by the owner of the oil, either the oil producers or the purchasers. Trans Mountain will neither own nor charter vessels. There are two methods to charter a vessel for transporting goods: Voyage or spot charter is an agreement in which the charterer (oil owner) leases a vessel and crew to transport cargo between specified loading and discharge ports. The charterer pays the vessel proprietor
Recommended publications
  • Security & Defence European

    Security & Defence European

    a 7.90 D 14974 E D European & Security ES & Defence 6/2019 International Security and Defence Journal COUNTRY FOCUS: AUSTRIA ISSN 1617-7983 • Heavy Lift Helicopters • Russian Nuclear Strategy • UAS for Reconnaissance and • NATO Military Engineering CoE Surveillance www.euro-sd.com • Airborne Early Warning • • Royal Norwegian Navy • Brazilian Army • UAS Detection • Cockpit Technology • Swiss “Air2030” Programme Developments • CBRN Decontamination June 2019 • CASEVAC/MEDEVAC Aircraft • Serbian Defence Exports Politics · Armed Forces · Procurement · Technology ANYTHING. In operations, the Eurofighter Typhoon is the proven choice of Air Forces. Unparalleled reliability and a continuous capability evolution across all domains mean that the Eurofighter Typhoon will play a vital role for decades to come. Air dominance. We make it fly. airbus.com Editorial Europe Needs More Pragmatism The elections to the European Parliament in May were beset with more paradoxes than they have ever been. The strongest party which will take its seats in the plenary chambers in Brus- sels (and, as an expensive anachronism, also in Strasbourg), albeit only for a brief period, is the Brexit Party, with 29 seats, whose programme is implicit in their name. Although EU institutions across the entire continent are challenged in terms of their public acceptance, in many countries the election has been fought with a very great deal of emotion, as if the day of reckoning is dawning, on which decisions will be All or Nothing. Some have raised concerns about the prosperous “European Project”, which they see as in dire need of rescue from malevolent sceptics. Others have painted an image of the decline of the West, which would inevitably come about if Brussels were to be allowed to continue on its present course.
  • Grande Cameroon

    Grande Cameroon

    Stena Penguin 464 Oil Product Tanker Stena Rederi, Sweden 65500 2010 Stena Polaris 463 Panamax Oil Tanker CM P‐MAX VIII Ltd., Bermuda 64917 2010 Stena Progress 462 Panamax Oil Tanker CM P‐MAX VIII Ltd., Bermuda 65056 2010 Artic Char 459 Panamax Oil Tanker Skol Shipping Co., Cyprus 74999 2010 Artic Flounder 458 Panamax Oil Tanker Wessels Shipping Co., Germany 74999 2009 Olib 461 Aframax Oil Tanker Tankerska Plovidba d.d., Croatia 109000 2009 Marinor 457 Panamax Oil Tanker Wessels Shipping Co., Germany 74999 2008 Dugi Otok 460 Aframax Oil Tanker Tankerska Plovidba d.d., Croatia 109000 2008 Marika 456 Panamax Oil Tanker Wessels Shipping Co., Germany 74999 2008 Mariann 451 Panamax Oil Tanker Marinvest Shipping, Sweden 74999 2008 Mari Ugland 450 Panamax Oil Tanker Marinvest Shipping, Sweden 74999 2008 Artic Char 459 Panamax Oil Tanker Wessels Shipping Co., Germany 74999 2008 Stena Poseidon 454 Panamax Oil Tanker Concordia, Stena Group, Sweden 75000 2007 Stena Pavla 455 Panamax Oil Tanker Concordia Stena Group, Sweden 75000 2007 Donat 447 Suezmax Oil Tanker Tankerska Plovidba d.d., Croatia 108000 2007 Maribel 449 Panamax Oil Tanker Marinvest Shipping, Sweden 74000 2007 Marilee 448 Panamax Oil Tanker Marinvest Shipping, Sweden 74000 2006 Stena Poseidon 454 Panamax Oil Tanker Concordia, Stena Group, Sweden 75000 2006 Stena Progetra 445 Handymax Oil Tanker Stena Rederi, Sweden 65500 2006 Stena Progress 446 Handymax Oil Tanker Stena Rederi, Sweden 65500 2006 Stena Provence 442 Handymax Oil Tanker Stena Rederi, Sweden 65500 2005 Stena Primorsk 443
  • Beat Project

    Beat Project

    BEAT PROJECT WP 3 – Cross Border cluster development on maritime technologies/Blue Technologies for knowledge sharing Activity 3.1. Assessment of conditions for transnational cluster development_DM 3.1.2 List of Organizations European Regional Development Fund www.italy-croatia.eu/acronym CROATIANS COMPANIES ............................................................................................................................................ 3 SHIPPING (SEA) ............................................................................................................................................................... 3 SHIP AND CARGO AGENTS .............................................................................................................................................. 5 CREW AND VESSEL MANAGEMENT .............................................................................................................................. 10 MOORING, PILOT AND TUG SERVICES .......................................................................................................................... 15 PORT OPERATORS ......................................................................................................................................................... 17 CARGO CONTROL AND INSPECTION ............................................................................................................................. 19 SHIP INSPECTION .........................................................................................................................................................
  • International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969

    International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969

    No. 21264 MULTILATERAL International Convention on tonnage measurement of ships, 1969 (with annexes, official translations of the Convention in the Russian and Spanish languages and Final Act of the Conference). Concluded at London on 23 June 1969 Authentic texts: English and French. Authentic texts of the Final Act: English, French, Russian and Spanish. Registered by the International Maritime Organization on 28 September 1982. MULTILAT RAL Convention internationale de 1969 sur le jaugeage des navires (avec annexes, traductions officielles de la Convention en russe et en espagnol et Acte final de la Conf rence). Conclue Londres le 23 juin 1969 Textes authentiques : anglais et fran ais. Textes authentiques de l©Acte final: anglais, fran ais, russe et espagnol. Enregistr e par l©Organisation maritime internationale le 28 septembre 1982. Vol. 1291, 1-21264 4_____ United Nations — Treaty Series Nations Unies — Recueil des TVait s 1982 INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION © ON TONNAGE MEASURE MENT OF SHIPS, 1969 The Contracting Governments, Desiring to establish uniform principles and rules with respect to the determination of tonnage of ships engaged on international voyages; Considering that this end may best be achieved by the conclusion of a Convention; Have agreed as follows: Article 1. GENERAL OBLIGATION UNDER THE CONVENTION The Contracting Governments undertake to give effect to the provisions of the present Convention and the annexes hereto which shall constitute an integral part of the present Convention. Every reference to the present Convention constitutes at the same time a reference to the annexes. Article 2. DEFINITIONS For the purpose of the present Convention, unless expressly provided otherwise: (1) "Regulations" means the Regulations annexed to the present Convention; (2) "Administration" means the Government of the State whose flag the ship is flying; (3) "International voyage" means a sea voyage from a country to which the present Convention applies to a port outside such country, or conversely.
  • Glossary of Nautical Terms: English – Japanese

    Glossary of Nautical Terms: English – Japanese

    Glossary of Nautical Terms: English – Japanese 2 Approved and Released by: Dal Bailey, DIR-IdC United States Coast Guard Auxiliary Interpreter Corps http://icdept.cgaux.org/ 6/29/2012 3 Index Glossary of Nautical Terms: English ‐ Japanese A…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...…..pages 4 ‐ 6 B……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……. pages 7 ‐ 18 C………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………...pages 19 ‐ 26 D……………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………………………..pages 27 ‐ 32 E……………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………….…………. pages 33 ‐ 35 F……………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………….………..……pages 36 ‐ 41 G……………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………...…………pages 42 ‐ 43 H……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….….………………..pages 49 ‐ 48 I…………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………….……….……... pages 49 ‐ 50 J…………………………….……..…………………………………………………………………………………………….………... page 51 K…………………………………………………………………………………………………….….…………..………………………page 52 L…………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………………….……..pages 53 ‐ 58 M…………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………………....….. pages 59 ‐ 62 N……………….........................................................................…………………………………..…….. pages 63 ‐ 64 O……………………………………..........................................................................…………….…….. pages 65 ‐ 67 P……………………….............................................................................................................. pages 68 ‐ 74 Q………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………….……...…… page 75 R………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………….…………..
  • International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969

    International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969

    Page 1 of 47 Lloyd’s Register Rulefinder 2005 – Version 9.4 Tonnage - International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969 Tonnage - International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969 Copyright 2005 Lloyd's Register or International Maritime Organization. All rights reserved. Lloyd's Register, its affiliates and subsidiaries and their respective officers, employees or agents are, individually and collectively, referred to in this clause as the 'Lloyd's Register Group'. The Lloyd's Register Group assumes no responsibility and shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance on the information or advice in this document or howsoever provided, unless that person has signed a contract with the relevant Lloyd's Register Group entity for the provision of this information or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract. file://C:\Documents and Settings\M.Ventura\Local Settings\Temp\~hh4CFD.htm 2009-09-22 Page 2 of 47 Lloyd’s Register Rulefinder 2005 – Version 9.4 Tonnage - International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969 - Articles of the International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships Articles of the International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships Copyright 2005 Lloyd's Register or International Maritime Organization. All rights reserved. Lloyd's Register, its affiliates and subsidiaries and their respective officers, employees or agents are, individually and collectively, referred to in this clause as the 'Lloyd's Register Group'. The Lloyd's Register Group assumes no responsibility and shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance on the information or advice in this document or howsoever provided, unless that person has signed a contract with the relevant Lloyd's Register Group entity for the provision of this information or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract.
  • Shipbuilding

    Shipbuilding

    Shipbuilding A promising rst half, an uncertain second one 2018 started briskly in the wake of 2017. In the rst half of the year, newbuilding orders were placed at a rate of about 10m dwt per month. However the pace dropped in the second half, as owners grappled with a rise in newbuilding prices and growing uncertainty over the IMO 2020 deadline. Regardless, newbuilding orders rose to 95.5m dwt in 2018 versus 83.1m dwt in 2017. Demand for bulkers, container carriers and specialised ships increased, while for tankers it receded, re ecting low freight rates and poor sentiment. Thanks to this additional demand, shipbuilders succeeded in raising newbuilding prices by about 10%. This enabled them to pass on some of the additional building costs resulting from higher steel prices, new regulations and increased pressure from marine suppliers, who have also been struggling since 2008. VIIKKI LNG-fuelled forest product carrier, 25,600 dwt (B.Delta 25), built in 2018 by China’s Jinling for Finland’s ESL Shipping. 5 Orders Million dwt 300 250 200 150 100 50 SHIPBUILDING SHIPBUILDING KEY POINTS OF 2018 KEY POINTS OF 2018 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Deliveries vs demolitions Fleet evolution Deliveries Demolitions Fleet KEY POINTS OF 2018 Summary 2017 2018 Million dwt Million dwt Million dwt Million dwt Ships 1,000 1,245 Orders 200 2,000 m dwt 83.1 95.5 180 The three Asian shipbuilding giants, representing almost 95% of the global 1,800 orderbook by deadweight, continued to ght ercely for market share.
  • Green Feeder Dual Fuel Container Vessel 1000 - Ecosmart Vessel

    Green Feeder Dual Fuel Container Vessel 1000 - Ecosmart Vessel

    GREEN FEEDER DUAL FUEL CONTAINER VESSEL 1000 - ECOSMART VESSEL The first green vessel with high added value built to the highest EU environmental regulations which globally achieve the largest fuel savings ALWAYS SIGNIFICANT IN THEIR CLASS Green Feeder 2 Taking inspiration from NATURE Inspired by nature’s constant struggle to keep our planet clean and safe, we devoted ourselves to developing the first container vessel, with NG dual fueled two-stroke diesel engine; the most efficient, safe and environmentally friendly ship. Green Feeder Cont. 1000 is 12.200 mt new generation eco-friendly Coverless Feeder Container vessel www.brodosplit.hr 3 ALWAYS SIGNIFICANT IN THEIR CLASS Green Feeder ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY and more fuel efficient The Vessel design is developed targeting environmentally friendly worldwide transportation through a set of focus areas that helped us to build a green future. THE VESSEL OFFERS • low resistance; achieved by the optimization of a hull using extensive CFD analysis and model testing with the accommodation incorporated in the hull and arranged forward in the bow of the vessel • optimized fuel saving; achieved by optimized hull, rudder, fixed pitch propeller with large diameter, as well as optimized propeller speed • 45% fuel savings of NG engine comparing to Marine Diesel Oil • optimized wake distribution • reduced light ship weight through 3D FEM structural analysis • maximum cargo volume and deadweight • good sea-keeping characteristics • functionality of the bridge • social education impact; academic role
  • SIMPLIFIED MEASUREMENT TONNAGE FORMULAS (46 CFR SUBPART E) Prepared by U.S

    SIMPLIFIED MEASUREMENT TONNAGE FORMULAS (46 CFR SUBPART E) Prepared by U.S

    SIMPLIFIED MEASUREMENT TONNAGE FORMULAS (46 CFR SUBPART E) Prepared by U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Center, Washington, DC Phone (202) 366-6441 GROSS TONNAGE NET TONNAGE SAILING HULLS D GROSS = 0.5 LBD SAILING HULLS 100 (PROPELLING MACHINERY IN HULL) NET = 0.9 GROSS SAILING HULLS (KEEL INCLUDED IN D) D GROSS = 0.375 LBD SAILING HULLS 100 (NO PROPELLING MACHINERY IN HULL) NET = GROSS SHIP-SHAPED AND SHIP-SHAPED, PONTOON AND CYLINDRICAL HULLS D D BARGE HULLS GROSS = 0.67 LBD (PROPELLING MACHINERY IN 100 HULL) NET = 0.8 GROSS BARGE-SHAPED HULLS SHIP-SHAPED, PONTOON AND D GROSS = 0.84 LBD BARGE HULLS 100 (NO PROPELLING MACHINERY IN HULL) NET = GROSS 1. DIMENSIONS. The dimensions, L, B and D, are the length, breadth and depth, respectively, of the hull measured in feet to the nearest tenth of a foot. See the conversion table on the back of this form for converting inches to tenths of a foot. LENGTH (L) is the horizontal distance between the outboard side of the foremost part of the stem and the outboard side of the aftermost part of the stern, excluding rudders, outboard motor brackets, and other similar fittings and attachments. BREADTH (B) is the horizontal distance taken at the widest part of the hull, excluding rub rails and deck caps, from the outboard side of the skin (outside planking or plating) on one side of the hull, to the outboard side of the skin on the other side of the hull. DEPTH (D) is the vertical distance taken at or near amidships from a line drawn horizontally through the uppermost edges of the skin (outside planking or plating) at the sides of the hull (excluding the cap rail, trunks, cabins, deck caps, and deckhouses) to the outboard face of the bottom skin of the hull, excluding the keel.
  • Measurement of Fishing

    Measurement of Fishing

    35 Rapp. P.-v. Réun. Cons. int. Explor. Mer, 168: 35-38. Janvier 1975. TONNAGE CERTIFICATE DATA AS FISHING POWER PARAMETERS F. d e B e e r Netherlands Institute for Fishery Investigations, IJmuiden, Netherlands INTRODUCTION London, June 1969 — An entirely new system of The international exchange of information about measuring the gross and net fishing vessels and the increasing scientific approach tonnage was set up called the to fisheries in general requires the use of a number of “International Convention on parameters of which there is a great variety especially Tonnage Measurement of in the field of main dimensions, coefficients, propulsion Ships, 1969” .1 data (horse power, propeller, etc.) and other partic­ ulars of fishing vessels. This variety is very often caused Every ship which has been measured and marked by different historical developments in different in accordance with the Convention concluded in Oslo, countries. 1947, is issued with a tonnage certificate called the The tonnage certificate is often used as an easy and “International Tonnage Certificate”. The tonnage of official source for parameters. However, though this a vessel consists of its gross tonnage and net tonnage. certificate is an official one and is based on Inter­ In this paper only the gross tonnage is discussed national Conventions its value for scientific purposes because net tonnage is not often used as a parameter. is questionable. The gross tonnage of a vessel, expressed in cubic meters and register tons (of 2-83 m3), is defined as the sum of all the enclosed spaces. INTERNATIONAL REGULATIONS ON TONNAGE These are: MEASUREMENT space below tonnage deck trunks International procedures for measuring the tonnage tweendeck space round houses of ships were laid down as follows : enclosed forecastle excess of hatchways bridge spaces spaces above the upper- Geneva, June 1939 - International regulations for break(s) deck included as part of tonnage measurement of ships poop the propelling machinery were issued through the League space.
  • Branch's Elements of Shipping/Alan E

    Branch's Elements of Shipping/Alan E

    ‘I would strongly recommend this book to anyone who is interested in shipping or taking a course where shipping is an important element, for example, chartering and broking, maritime transport, exporting and importing, ship management, and international trade. Using an approach of simple analysis and pragmatism, the book provides clear explanations of the basic elements of ship operations and commercial, legal, economic, technical, managerial, logistical, and financial aspects of shipping.’ Dr Jiangang Fei, National Centre for Ports & Shipping, Australian Maritime College, University of Tasmania, Australia ‘Branch’s Elements of Shipping provides the reader with the best all-round examination of the many elements of the international shipping industry. This edition serves as a fitting tribute to Alan Branch and is an essential text for anyone with an interest in global shipping.’ David Adkins, Lecturer in International Procurement and Supply Chain Management, Plymouth Graduate School of Management, Plymouth University ‘Combining the traditional with the modern is as much a challenge as illuminating operations without getting lost in the fascination of the technical detail. This is particularly true for the world of shipping! Branch’s Elements of Shipping is an ongoing example for mastering these challenges. With its clear maritime focus it provides a very comprehensive knowledge base for relevant terms and details and it is a useful source of expertise for students and practitioners in the field.’ Günter Prockl, Associate Professor, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark This page intentionally left blank Branch’s Elements of Shipping Since it was first published in 1964, Elements of Shipping has become established as a market leader.
  • AFRAMAX Tanker Design

    AFRAMAX Tanker Design

    The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers (SNAME) Greek Section – Technical Meeting 15. March 2012, Athens HOLISTIC SHIP DESIGN OPTIMISATION: Theory and Applications by Apostolos Papanikolaou National Technical University of Athens - NTUA Ship Design Laboratory – SDL http://www.naval.ntua.gr/sdl A. Papanikolaou HOLISTIC SHIP DESIGN OPTIMISATION 1 List of contents 1. Introduction to Holistic Ship Design Optimisation • Important Design Optimization Notions • Holistic Optimisation Methodology 2. Optimization of RoPax ships – Case study • Projects ROROPROB (2000-2003) and EPAN-MET4 (2004-2007) 3. Optimisation of High-Speed vessels • Project FLOWMART (2000-2003) 4. Holistic Optimisation of Tanker Ships – Projects SAFEDOR and BEST (2005-2011) • Multi-objective Optimization of Tanker Ships • Case study-reference ship • Alternative configurations • Discussion of results 5. Conclusions- The Way Ahead A. Papanikolaou HOLISTIC SHIP DESIGN OPTIMISATION 2 Important Design Optimization Notions (1) • Holism (from Greek όλος, meaning entire, total)-holistic The properties of a system cannot be determined or explained by looking at its component parts alone; instead of, the system as a whole determines decisively how the part components behave or perform. “The whole is more than the sum of the parts” (Aristotle Metaphysics) • Reductionism-reduction: is sometimes interpreted as the opposite of holism. “A complex system can be approached by reduction to its fundamental parts” • Holism and reductionism need, for proper account of complex systems, to be regarded as complementary approaches to system analysis. • Systemic and analytical approaches are also complementary and strongly related to holism and reductionism • Risk (financial): “A quantifiable likelihood of loss or of less-than-expected returns” • Risk (general): “A quantifiable likelihood of loss of an acceptable state or of a worse-than-expected state condition” • Safety: may be defined as “An acceptable state of risk” A.