DOCSLIB.ORG

Measurement of Fishing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Measurement of Fishing 35 Rapp. P.-v. Réun. Cons. int. Explor. Mer, 168: 35-38. Janvier 1975. TONNAGE CERTIFICATE DATA AS FISHING POWER PARAMETERS F. d e B e e r Netherlands Institute for Fishery Investigations, IJmuiden, Netherlands INTRODUCTION London, June 1969 — An entirely new system of The international exchange of information about measuring the gross and net fishing vessels and the increasing scientific approach tonnage was set up called the to fisheries in general requires the use of a number of “International Convention on parameters of which there is a great variety especially Tonnage Measurement of in the field of main dimensions, coefficients, propulsion Ships, 1969” .1 data (horse power, propeller, etc.) and other partic­ ulars of fishing vessels. This variety is very often caused Every ship which has been measured and marked by different historical developments in different in accordance with the Convention concluded in Oslo, countries. 1947, is issued with a tonnage certificate called the The tonnage certificate is often used as an easy and “International Tonnage Certificate”. The tonnage of official source for parameters. However, though this a vessel consists of its gross tonnage and net tonnage. certificate is an official one and is based on Inter­ In this paper only the gross tonnage is discussed national Conventions its value for scientific purposes because net tonnage is not often used as a parameter. is questionable. The gross tonnage of a vessel, expressed in cubic meters and register tons (of 2-83 m3), is defined as the sum of all the enclosed spaces. INTERNATIONAL REGULATIONS ON TONNAGE These are: MEASUREMENT space below tonnage deck trunks International procedures for measuring the tonnage tweendeck space round houses of ships were laid down as follows : enclosed forecastle excess of hatchways bridge spaces spaces above the upper- Geneva, June 1939 - International regulations for break(s) deck included as part of tonnage measurement of ships poop the propelling machinery were issued through the League space. of Nations to obtain a kind of uniform “param eter” (gross However, the following are not included in the gross tonnage and net tonnage) to tonnage: use for harbour dues, dock dues, lock dues, canal dues, etc. double bottom spaces ceiling in holds Oslo, June 1947 - A convention was held to dis­ parts of tanks concrete floors in fish cuss differences in the regula­ space of engine room base holds tions for tonnage measurement casings space of fish processing of ships and in the application machinery of such regulations, the “Con­ vention for a Uniform System All the included spaces are measured from top of of Tonnage Measurement of frames, beams, floors, etc. (Fig. 16). Ships” . It is clear that gross tonnage must be regarded as a Oslo, May 1965 - A revision of the regulations of kind of “administrative parameter” . Great differences the 1947 convention. The ton­ can occur in the gross tonnages of vessels with similar nage mark was introduced. 1 As of September 1974 this was not yet in force. 3* 36 F. de Beer 3. type lb a tonnage certificate for vessels with more than one deck. For this type the second deck is the tonnage deck (open shelter deck ship). A tonnage mark is required. This system of measuring gross tonnage can create great differences between similar fishing vessels as the following example shows. Two Dutch trawlers built on the same design (body plan, construction plan, etc.) and having the same dimensions given below Figure 16. Tonnage measurement according to 1947 (1965) con­ vention. length overall 50-16 length p.p. 43-25 moulded breadth 8-50 depth upper deck 6-45 depth second deck 4-20 mean draught ± 4.00 have the following tonnage certificates: vessel SCH 171 SCH 6 type of vessel stern trawler stern trawler year built 1966 1967 identification length 46-35 m 46-30 m type o f certificate I lb Figure 17. Tonnage measurement according to 1969 convention. tonnage deck upper deck second deck gross tonnage 605-81 register tons 362-27 register tons dimensions, displacement, etc. due, for instance, to The main dimensions of a vessel given in the tonnage the positioning of watertight bulkheads in super­ certificate, called identification dimensions, are only structures, differences in type of construction, applica­ set up for the determination of the tonnage. They are tion of excluded spaces, and type of tonnage certifi­ (a) overall length: the distance between the extreme cate. end of the stem and stern. Differences in gross tonnage of 10% to 15% can (b) length : from the fore side of the upper­ occur between similar fishing vessels, measured in ac­ most end of the stem to the aft cordance with the regulations of the convention of side of the upper end of the stern- 1947 but before the revision of 1965. post or, if there is no sternpost, to The upper deck (weather deck) of fishing vessels the point of intersection of the fore with more than one deck was generally regarded as side of the rudderstock and the the tonnage deck. upper deck. The 1965 convention which came into force in the (c) breadth : extreme outside (rubbing pieces Netherlands in April 1967 introduced the tonnage not included). mark. This resulted in three types of tonnage certifi­ (d) depth : the depth is measured in the cates, viz. : middle plane at half length, from the underside of the upper deck 1. type I a tonnage certificate for vessels with one to the upperside of the double deck (upper deck = tonnage deck) ; no bottom plating or top of floors. tonnage mark required. 2. type la a tonnage certificate for vessels with more than one deck and having two gross ton­ THE 1969 LONDON CONVENTION nages. Recognizing that the establishment of a universal upper deck = tonnage deck (closed shelter system of tonnage measurement for ships should con­ deck ship) stitute an important contribution to maritime trans­ second deck = tonnage deck (open shelter port, a conference was held (London, May/June 1969), deck ship) upon the invitation of IMCO, for the purpose of draw­ A tonnage mark is required. ing up a new international convention on tonnage Tonnage certificate data as fishing power parameters 37 Table 15. Stern trawlers Tonnage Certificate data Bodyplan data Gross tonnage Length Year Registration no. 1947 1947/1965 o.a. B D built H.P. L s B s D s L pp Lew I m m m m m m m m type I type lb U K 66 1968 540 104-53 26-08 24-92 6-62 2-59 24-50 6-60 3-10 GO 14 1968 705 120-32 26-25 25-09 6-62 2-77 ---- 24-50 6-60 3-30 KW 141 1966 1200 528-36 48-25 44-92 8-54 3-62 42-00 ---- 8-50 6-45/4-25 SCH 44 1965 500 64-82 25-65 24-06 5-63 2-16 ---- 22-20 5-60 2-60 \ OD 10 1963 720 76-87 25-65 24-71 5-63 2-12 ---- 22-20 5-60 2-60 / senes KW 15 1961 1200 477-56 348-09* 45-62 42-50 8-52 3-79 41-25 ---- 8-50 4-32 KW 41 1963 1200 484-00 345-41* 45-92 42-78 8-52 3-79 41-25 ---- 8-50 4-32 KW 43 1962 1200 480-17 347-72* 45-65 42-53 8-52 3-79 41-25 ---- 8-50 4-32 1 serles KW 123 1964 1200 482-55 335-60* 46-00 42-87 8-52 3-79 41-25 ---- 8-50 4-32 KW 170 1967 1200 375-46 49-15 46-02 8-52 3-48 45-25 ---- 8-50 4-32 \ 4 3 2 i series IJM 57 1966 1320 559-57 49-12 46-06 8-52 3-48 45-25 ---- 8-50 U K 205 1967 660 101-27 26-20 24-07 6-72 2-75 22-85 ---- 6-70 3-40 U K 207 1967 660 101-27 26-20 24-07 6-72 2-75 22-85 ---- 6-70 3-40 > series OD 5 1968 705 104-80 26-20 24-52 6-72 2-75 22-85 ---- 6-70 3-40 KW 81 1967 1600 382-44 49-99 46-13 9-02 5-62 43-50 ---- 900 6-55/4-34 SCH 24/SCH 33 1966 1240 643-74 390-80* 49-84 46-27 8-52 5-30 43-00 ---- 8-50 6-54/4-34 SCH 123 1968 1240 377-00 51-91 48-05 9-02 5-46 45-50 ---- 9-00 6-39/4-24 SCH 110 1967 1200 362-26 49-75 46-18 8-52 5-40 43-00 ---- 8-50 6-39/4-24 G O 9 1967 680 120-19 26-19 25-09 6-03 2-95 ---- 24-70 6-00 3-40 SCH 34 1966 700 91-80 29-50 28-17 5-93 2-48 26-50 ---- 5-90 2-90 U K 64 1967 500 133-01 28-60 26-85 6-42 2-52 25-10 ---- 6-40 3-40 U K 89 1967 450 78-20 26-00 24-54 5-92 2-16 22-60 ---- 5-90 2-90 \ 2 go i series U K 121 1965 435 76-20 25-46 24-14 5-93 2-22 22-60 ---- 5-90 remeasured: vessels with a new tonnage certificate. measurement of ships. It was decided that the con­ tonnage (present) is 98-10 register tons. The total vention should come into force 24 months after the volume of all enclosed spaces V = 329 m3 and hence date on which not less than 25 governments or states, K, = 0-2503.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In This Issue …
    In This Issue … INLAND SEAS®VOLUME 72 WINTER 2016 NUMBER 4 MAUMEE VALLEY COMES HOME . 290 by Christopher H. Gillcrist KEEPING IT IN TRIM: BALLAST AND GREAT LAKES SHIPPING . 292 by Matthew Daley, Grand Valley State University Jeffrey L. Ram, Wayne State University RUNNING OUT OF STEAM, NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS FROM THE SS HERBERT C. JACKSON . 319 by Patrick D. Lapinski NATIONAL RECREATION AREAS AND THE CREATION OF PICTURED ROCKS NATIONAL LAKESHORE . 344 by Kathy S. Mason BOOKS . 354 GREAT LAKES NEWS . 356 by Greg Rudnick MUSEUM COLUMN . 374 by Carrie Sowden 289 KEEPING IT IN TRIM: BALLAST AND GREAT LAKES SHIPPING by Matthew Daley, Grand Valley State University Jeffrey L. Ram, Wayne State University n the morning of July 24, 1915, hundreds of employees of the West- Oern Electric Company and their families boarded the passenger steamship Eastland for a day trip to Michigan City, Indiana. Built in 1903, this twin screw, steel hulled steamship was considered a fast boat on her regular run. Yet throughout her service life, her design revealed a series of problems with stability. Additionally, changes such as more lifeboats in the aftermath of the Titanic disaster, repositioning of engines, and alterations to her upper cabins, made these built-in issues far worse. These failings would come to a disastrous head at the dock on the Chicago River. With over 2,500 passengers aboard, the ship heeled back and forth as the chief engineer struggled to control the ship’s stability and failed. At 7:30 a.m., the Eastland heeled to port, coming to rest on the river bottom, trapping pas- sengers inside the hull and throwing many more into the river.
    [Show full text]
  • Malacca-Max the Ul Timate Container Carrier
    MALACCA-MAX THE UL TIMATE CONTAINER CARRIER Design innovation in container shipping 2443 625 8 Bibliotheek TU Delft . IIIII I IIII III III II II III 1111 I I11111 C 0003815611 DELFT MARINE TECHNOLOGY SERIES 1 . Analysis of the Containership Charter Market 1983-1992 2 . Innovation in Forest Products Shipping 3. Innovation in Shortsea Shipping: Self-Ioading and Unloading Ship systems 4. Nederlandse Maritieme Sektor: Economische Structuur en Betekenis 5. Innovation in Chemical Shipping: Port and Slops Management 6. Multimodal Shortsea shipping 7. De Toekomst van de Nederlandse Zeevaartsector: Economische Impact Studie (EIS) en Beleidsanalyse 8. Innovatie in de Containerbinnenvaart: Geautomatiseerd Overslagsysteem 9. Analysis of the Panamax bulk Carrier Charter Market 1989-1994: In relation to the Design Characteristics 10. Analysis of the Competitive Position of Short Sea Shipping: Development of Policy Measures 11. Design Innovation in Shipping 12. Shipping 13. Shipping Industry Structure 14. Malacca-max: The Ultimate Container Carrier For more information about these publications, see : http://www-mt.wbmt.tudelft.nl/rederijkunde/index.htm MALACCA-MAX THE ULTIMATE CONTAINER CARRIER Niko Wijnolst Marco Scholtens Frans Waals DELFT UNIVERSITY PRESS 1999 Published and distributed by: Delft University Press P.O. Box 98 2600 MG Delft The Netherlands Tel: +31-15-2783254 Fax: +31-15-2781661 E-mail: [email protected] CIP-DATA KONINKLIJKE BIBLIOTHEEK, Tp1X Niko Wijnolst, Marco Scholtens, Frans Waals Shipping Industry Structure/Wijnolst, N.; Scholtens, M; Waals, F.A .J . Delft: Delft University Press. - 111. Lit. ISBN 90-407-1947-0 NUGI834 Keywords: Container ship, Design innovation, Suez Canal Copyright <tl 1999 by N. Wijnolst, M .
    [Show full text]
  • International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969
    No. 21264 MULTILATERAL International Convention on tonnage measurement of ships, 1969 (with annexes, official translations of the Convention in the Russian and Spanish languages and Final Act of the Conference). Concluded at London on 23 June 1969 Authentic texts: English and French. Authentic texts of the Final Act: English, French, Russian and Spanish. Registered by the International Maritime Organization on 28 September 1982. MULTILAT RAL Convention internationale de 1969 sur le jaugeage des navires (avec annexes, traductions officielles de la Convention en russe et en espagnol et Acte final de la Conf rence). Conclue Londres le 23 juin 1969 Textes authentiques : anglais et fran ais. Textes authentiques de l©Acte final: anglais, fran ais, russe et espagnol. Enregistr e par l©Organisation maritime internationale le 28 septembre 1982. Vol. 1291, 1-21264 4_____ United Nations — Treaty Series Nations Unies — Recueil des TVait s 1982 INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION © ON TONNAGE MEASURE MENT OF SHIPS, 1969 The Contracting Governments, Desiring to establish uniform principles and rules with respect to the determination of tonnage of ships engaged on international voyages; Considering that this end may best be achieved by the conclusion of a Convention; Have agreed as follows: Article 1. GENERAL OBLIGATION UNDER THE CONVENTION The Contracting Governments undertake to give effect to the provisions of the present Convention and the annexes hereto which shall constitute an integral part of the present Convention. Every reference to the present Convention constitutes at the same time a reference to the annexes. Article 2. DEFINITIONS For the purpose of the present Convention, unless expressly provided otherwise: (1) "Regulations" means the Regulations annexed to the present Convention; (2) "Administration" means the Government of the State whose flag the ship is flying; (3) "International voyage" means a sea voyage from a country to which the present Convention applies to a port outside such country, or conversely.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential for Terrorist Nuclear Attack Using Oil Tankers
    Order Code RS21997 December 7, 2004 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Port and Maritime Security: Potential for Terrorist Nuclear Attack Using Oil Tankers Jonathan Medalia Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Summary While much attention has been focused on threats to maritime security posed by cargo container ships, terrorists could also attempt to use oil tankers to stage an attack. If they were able to place an atomic bomb in a tanker and detonate it in a U.S. port, they would cause massive destruction and might halt crude oil shipments worldwide for some time. Detecting a bomb in a tanker would be difficult. Congress may consider various options to address this threat. This report will be updated as needed. Introduction The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, heightened interest in port and maritime security.1 Much of this interest has focused on cargo container ships because of concern that terrorists could use containers to transport weapons into the United States, yet only a small fraction of the millions of cargo containers entering the country each year is inspected. Some observers fear that a container-borne atomic bomb detonated in a U.S. port could wreak economic as well as physical havoc. Robert Bonner, the head of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), has argued that such an attack would lead to a halt to container traffic worldwide for some time, bringing the world economy to its knees. Stephen Flynn, a retired Coast Guard commander and an expert on maritime security at the Council on Foreign Relations, holds a similar view.2 While container ships accounted for 30.5% of vessel calls to U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969
    Page 1 of 47 Lloyd’s Register Rulefinder 2005 – Version 9.4 Tonnage - International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969 Tonnage - International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969 Copyright 2005 Lloyd's Register or International Maritime Organization. All rights reserved. Lloyd's Register, its affiliates and subsidiaries and their respective officers, employees or agents are, individually and collectively, referred to in this clause as the 'Lloyd's Register Group'. The Lloyd's Register Group assumes no responsibility and shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance on the information or advice in this document or howsoever provided, unless that person has signed a contract with the relevant Lloyd's Register Group entity for the provision of this information or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract. file://C:\Documents and Settings\M.Ventura\Local Settings\Temp\~hh4CFD.htm 2009-09-22 Page 2 of 47 Lloyd’s Register Rulefinder 2005 – Version 9.4 Tonnage - International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969 - Articles of the International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships Articles of the International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships Copyright 2005 Lloyd's Register or International Maritime Organization. All rights reserved. Lloyd's Register, its affiliates and subsidiaries and their respective officers, employees or agents are, individually and collectively, referred to in this clause as the 'Lloyd's Register Group'. The Lloyd's Register Group assumes no responsibility and shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance on the information or advice in this document or howsoever provided, unless that person has signed a contract with the relevant Lloyd's Register Group entity for the provision of this information or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract.
    [Show full text]
  • Shipbuilding
    Shipbuilding A promising rst half, an uncertain second one 2018 started briskly in the wake of 2017. In the rst half of the year, newbuilding orders were placed at a rate of about 10m dwt per month. However the pace dropped in the second half, as owners grappled with a rise in newbuilding prices and growing uncertainty over the IMO 2020 deadline. Regardless, newbuilding orders rose to 95.5m dwt in 2018 versus 83.1m dwt in 2017. Demand for bulkers, container carriers and specialised ships increased, while for tankers it receded, re ecting low freight rates and poor sentiment. Thanks to this additional demand, shipbuilders succeeded in raising newbuilding prices by about 10%. This enabled them to pass on some of the additional building costs resulting from higher steel prices, new regulations and increased pressure from marine suppliers, who have also been struggling since 2008. VIIKKI LNG-fuelled forest product carrier, 25,600 dwt (B.Delta 25), built in 2018 by China’s Jinling for Finland’s ESL Shipping. 5 Orders Million dwt 300 250 200 150 100 50 SHIPBUILDING SHIPBUILDING KEY POINTS OF 2018 KEY POINTS OF 2018 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Deliveries vs demolitions Fleet evolution Deliveries Demolitions Fleet KEY POINTS OF 2018 Summary 2017 2018 Million dwt Million dwt Million dwt Million dwt Ships 1,000 1,245 Orders 200 2,000 m dwt 83.1 95.5 180 The three Asian shipbuilding giants, representing almost 95% of the global 1,800 orderbook by deadweight, continued to ght ercely for market share.
    [Show full text]
  • Ship Stability
    2018-08-07 Lecture Note of Naval Architectural Calculation Ship Stability Ch. 7 Inclining Test Spring 2018 Myung-Il Roh Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering Seoul National University 1 Naval Architectural Calculation, Spring 2018, Myung-Il Roh Contents þ Ch. 1 Introduction to Ship Stability þ Ch. 2 Review of Fluid Mechanics þ Ch. 3 Transverse Stability Due to Cargo Movement þ Ch. 4 Initial Transverse Stability þ Ch. 5 Initial Longitudinal Stability þ Ch. 6 Free Surface Effect þ Ch. 7 Inclining Test þ Ch. 8 Curves of Stability and Stability Criteria þ Ch. 9 Numerical Integration Method in Naval Architecture þ Ch. 10 Hydrostatic Values and Curves þ Ch. 11 Static Equilibrium State after Flooding Due to Damage þ Ch. 12 Deterministic Damage Stability þ Ch. 13 Probabilistic Damage Stability 2 Naval Architectural Calculation, Spring 2018, Myung-Il Roh 1 2018-08-07 How can you get the value of the KG? K: Keel G: Center of gravity Ch. 7 Inclining Test 3 Naval Architectural Calculation, Spring 2018, Myung-Il Roh The Problem of Finding an Accurate Vertical Center of Gravity (KG) The problem of finding an accurate KG for a ship is a serious one for the ship’s designer. FG G ü Any difference in the weight of structural parts, equipment, or welds in different ship will produce a different KG. K There is an accurate method of finding KG for any particular ship and that is the inclining test. 4 Naval Architectural Calculation, Spring 2018, Myung-Il Roh 2 2018-08-07 Required Values to Find the KG (2/3) Heeling moment produced by total weight Righting moment produced by buoyant force Static equilibrium of moment t =F × GZ Inclining test formula r B 6 Naval Architectural Calculation, Spring 2018, Myung-Il Roh Required Values to Find the KG (1/3) GZ» GM ×sinf (at small angle f ) GM= KB +BM - KGKG The purpose of the inclining test is to determine the position of the center of mass of the ship in an accurately known condition.
    [Show full text]
  • SIMPLIFIED MEASUREMENT TONNAGE FORMULAS (46 CFR SUBPART E) Prepared by U.S
    SIMPLIFIED MEASUREMENT TONNAGE FORMULAS (46 CFR SUBPART E) Prepared by U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Center, Washington, DC Phone (202) 366-6441 GROSS TONNAGE NET TONNAGE SAILING HULLS D GROSS = 0.5 LBD SAILING HULLS 100 (PROPELLING MACHINERY IN HULL) NET = 0.9 GROSS SAILING HULLS (KEEL INCLUDED IN D) D GROSS = 0.375 LBD SAILING HULLS 100 (NO PROPELLING MACHINERY IN HULL) NET = GROSS SHIP-SHAPED AND SHIP-SHAPED, PONTOON AND CYLINDRICAL HULLS D D BARGE HULLS GROSS = 0.67 LBD (PROPELLING MACHINERY IN 100 HULL) NET = 0.8 GROSS BARGE-SHAPED HULLS SHIP-SHAPED, PONTOON AND D GROSS = 0.84 LBD BARGE HULLS 100 (NO PROPELLING MACHINERY IN HULL) NET = GROSS 1. DIMENSIONS. The dimensions, L, B and D, are the length, breadth and depth, respectively, of the hull measured in feet to the nearest tenth of a foot. See the conversion table on the back of this form for converting inches to tenths of a foot. LENGTH (L) is the horizontal distance between the outboard side of the foremost part of the stem and the outboard side of the aftermost part of the stern, excluding rudders, outboard motor brackets, and other similar fittings and attachments. BREADTH (B) is the horizontal distance taken at the widest part of the hull, excluding rub rails and deck caps, from the outboard side of the skin (outside planking or plating) on one side of the hull, to the outboard side of the skin on the other side of the hull. DEPTH (D) is the vertical distance taken at or near amidships from a line drawn horizontally through the uppermost edges of the skin (outside planking or plating) at the sides of the hull (excluding the cap rail, trunks, cabins, deck caps, and deckhouses) to the outboard face of the bottom skin of the hull, excluding the keel.
    [Show full text]
  • GUIDANCE MANUAL for TONNAGE SURVEYS of VESSELS up to 24 Metres (LENGTH)
    International Institute of Marine Surveying GUIDANCE MANUAL FOR TONNAGE SURVEYS OF VESSELS UP TO 24 Metres (LENGTH) Page 1 of 19 IIMS Tonnage Survey Manual - Jan 2017 V3 © IIMS CERTIFYING AUTHORITY 2017 Contents Page 3 Introduction Page 4 Who can undertake Tonnage Surveys through the IIMS? Page 5 Tonnage survey process Page 6 Tonnage Survey process Information required for completion of the certificate of survey. Name of ship UK Ports of choice Page 7 Tonnage Survey process Other Red Ensign Flags Official number HIN/CIN Year built Page 8 Tonnage Survey process Type of ship Ship power Builder’s name and address Construction material Date of survey Place of survey Measurement interpretations Definition of Length Overall Page 9 Diagrams of LOA aft and forward measurement points Definition of Length Definition of Breadth Page 10 Breadth Diagrams Definition of Depth Page 11 Definition of Depth continued. Depth diagrams Page 12 Depth lower terminal points and diagrams Page 13 Break definition and example diagrams Page 14 Multihulls and Breaks definition including example diagrams Page 15 Multihulls and Breaks definition including example diagrams continued Page 16 Rigid Inflatables (RIB) and diagram Page 17 Tonnage calculations Measurer’s contact details Particulars of propelling engines Page 18 Suggested equipment for carrying out a Tonnage Survey Further advice Page 19 Appendices Appendix 1 The Merchant Shipping (Tonnage) Regulations 1997 Appendix 2 MGN 527: Tonnage Measurement Clarification of Procedures for Multihulls Page 2 of 19 IIMS Tonnage Survey Manual - Jan 2017 V3 © IIMS CERTIFYING AUTHORITY 2017 Introduction The IIMS CA (Certifying Authority) is approved by the MCA to undertake Tonnage Measurements on vessels of up to 24m ‘Length’ for British Registration.
    [Show full text]
  • Safe Harbor Worksheet
    Safe Harbor Worksheet Description: Why should we care about Harbors? Roughly 90% of the world's goods are transported by sea. The port of NY/NJ is the third busiest port in the U.S. and the 18th in the World. Without our ports, life as we know it would not exist, however they are often overlooked. As trade volume increases, so does the size of ships. When European explorers first visited the New York Harbor, they found an estuary with a natural depth of 17 feet. As colonies became established and trade flourished, shipping channels were needed to allow for bigger ships. By 1880, the main ship channel was dredged to a depth of 24 feet and by 1891 to a depth of 30 feet. In 1914 the Ambrose Channel became the main entrance to the port of New York and had a depth of 40 feet and 2,000 feet wide (ship design changes/technological advancements allowed for wider ships). During World War II the main channel was dredged to 45 feet deep to accommodate larger ships up to Panamax size (the largest size ship which could travel through the Panama Canal). Panamax (1916) New Panamax (2016) Tonnage: 52,500 DWT Tonnage: 120,000 DWT Length: 950 ft Length: 1,201 ft Beam: 106 ft Beam: 161 ft Height: 190 ft Height: 190 ft Draft: 39.5 ft Draft: 50 ft Capacity: 5,000 TEU Capacity: 13,000 TEU Eventually even the Panama Canal was not big enough. In 2016, an expanded Panama Canal opened to allow for significantly larger ships (see above).
    [Show full text]
  • Determirjiation of the Compensated Gross Tonnage Factors for Superyachts
    International Shipbuilding Progress 57 (2010) 127-146 127 DOI 10.3233/ISP-2010-0066 lOS Press Determirjiation of the Compensated Gross Tonnage factors for superyachts Jeroen FJ. Pruyn Robert G. Helckenberg ^ and Chris M. van Hooren^ ^ Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands ^ Supeiyacht Builders Association, Delft, The Netherlands In order to provide the basis for a fair comparison, an indicator was developed to measure the amount of work that goes into the construction of a vessel. The foundation for this Compensated Gross Tonnage was laid in the 1970s by the OECD to compensate for the differences in work involved in producing a gross ton (GT) of ship in different sizes and types. Since 2007, the CGT of a vessel of a certain type as a function of its size (measured in GT) has been expressed as CGT = A x GT-®. However, no interna­ tionally accepted A and B values exist to convert superyachts from GT to CGT. The superyacht building industry believes that this omission results in an under appreciation of the importance of the sector. This paper describes the research carried out into this subject and confirms that the cuiTent assignments for su­ peryachts greatly under appreciate the value of the sector. Based on the current data, the most appropriate values for superyachts are 278 for A and 0.58 for B. The spread is quite large and more data would help confirm this finding. Keywords: CGT, superyachts, shipbuilding 1. Background: CGT factors To compare the output of shipyards and shipbuilding industries using the size of delivered vessels (e.g., in terms of Gross Tonnage) alone is insufficient: how does one compare a (very large) crude oil tanker to a (smaller but much more complex) passenger ship? In order to provide the foundation for a fair comparison, an indicator was de­ veloped to measure the amount of work that goes into the construction of a ves­ sel: Compensated Gross Tonnage.
    [Show full text]
  • User Manual – Tanker Rapid Response Damage
    USER MANUAL – TANKER RAPID RESPONSE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT September 2019 © 2019 American Bureau of Shipping. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. USER MANUAL – TANKER RRDA Contents 1.1 General Information .................................................................................................. 5 1.2 Instructions for Validating Enrollment Status ........................................................... 6 1.3 Types of Analyses for Response ............................................................................... 7 1.4 Drills .......................................................................................................................... 7 1.5 Training ..................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Activating/Notifying RRDA Team ........................................................................... 9 2.2 Time to Respond. ...................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Office Hours .............................................................................................................. 9 2.4 After Office Hours .................................................................................................. 10 2.5 Action After Voice Notification .............................................................................. 10 3.1 Information Requirements ....................................................................................... 11 3.2 Load Condition Before the Incident. ......................................................................
    [Show full text]