DOCSLIB.ORG

Western Madagascan Vegetation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Plant Formations in the Western Madagascan BioProvince Peter Martin Rhind Western Madagascan Dry Deciduous Forests of Lateritic Clay These soils support the most luxuriant forests of east Madagascar and are usually characterized by endemic species such as Cordyla madagascariensis and Givotia madagascariensis, and a variety of endemic species of the genera Dalbergia and Ravensara. Other important trees include Stereospermum euphorioides and Xylia hildebrandtii. Most of the lianas belong to the Asclepiadaceae or genera such as Combretum, Dichapetalum, Landolphia and Tetracena, while most of the under story is characterized by species of the Euphorbiaceae, Fabaceae and Rubiaceae. A feature unique to these forests is the presence of a species Dracaena and a bamboo that have deciduous leaves. Western Madagascan Dry Deciduous Forests of Sandy Soils The soils of these forests are derived from Jurassic and Cretaceous sandstones, but where they are very dry the forests are reduced to thicket. In the more fully developed forests the arborescent species usually display a three-layered structure. The upper layer or canopy consists of trees taller than 12 m, but comparatively few species are capable of reaching these heights. They normally include mainly endemic species such as Adansonia grandidieri, A. rubrostipa, A. za, (Malvaceae), Capurodendron greveanum (Sapotaceae), Cedrelopsis grevei (Rutaceae), Commiphora arafy, C. mafaidoha (Burseraceae), Cordyla madagascariensis (Fabaceae), Dalbergia purpuresens (Fabaceae), Delonix boiviniana (Fabaceae) and Hazomalania voyroni (Hernandiaceae). The middle layer grows to between 6-21 m high and frequently includes a number of evergreen species. Among the common taxa are endemic species such as Cedrelopsis gracilos, C. microfoliolata (Rutaceae), Fernandoa madagascariensis (Bignoniaceae), Operculicarya gummifera (Anacardiaceae) and Tetrapterocarpon geayi (Fabaceae). Below this layer is often dense undergrowth extending up to a height of 5 m. The common components here include genera such as Bauhinia, Byttneria, Chionanthus, Grewia, Rothmannia, Scurinega, Strychnos, together with the endemic Baudouinia (Fabaceae) and Cedrelopsis (Rutaceae). Drought resistance amongst these species takes various forms. Adansonia, Delonix and Givotia store water in their trunks (pachycauly), Gyrocarpus and Neobeguea do so in root bulbs or tubers, and most species have small, xeromorphic leaves. In the south of the BioProvince, the dryness is exemplified by the fact that most of the deciduous forests support large numbers of cactoid Euphorbia species, with Euphorbia enterophora reaching heights of 20 m. Other associated species here include Broussonetia (Chlorophora) graveana, Flacourtia indica, Hernandia voyroni, Protorhus deflexa and the endemic Adansonia grandidierii (Malvaceae). Moister soils are often characterized by Tamarindus indicus, but possibly more characteristic of wet sandy soils are species such as Berchemia discolor, Colubrina decipiens, Ficus trichopoda, Rhus perrieri, Stereospermum arcuatum, Terminalia species, Triculea africana, together with endemics like Astrotrichilia astrotricha (Meliaceae), Quivisianthe papinae (Meliaceae) and Rhopalocarpus lucidus (Sphaerosepalaceae). Western Madagascan Dry Deciduous Forests of Calcareous Soils These forests generally have a lower stature than other east Madagascan dry forests. They also have fewer lianas and fewer evergreen species, while trees and shrubs with swollen stems such as Adansonia, Bathiaea and Harpagophytum are more abundant. Protorhus humbertii, P. perrieri, Sideroxylon collinum and species of Albizia and Erythrophysa are some of the more important canopy taxa. The endemic but widely Copyright © 2010 Peter Martin Rhind cultivated Delonix regia (Fabaceae) is also part of this community but is now very rare in the wild. A few larger trees occur as emergents such as the endemic Adansonia rubrostipa and A. za (Malvaceae) and the endemic Diospyros perrieri (Ebenaceae) but these tend to grow in deep fissures. Further information required. References Chapman, V. J. 1977. Africa B - the remainder of Africa. In: Ecosystems of the World 1 - Wet Coastal Ecosystems. Ed. V. J. Chapman. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company. Buam, D. A. 1996. The ecology and conservation of the baobabs of Madagascar. In: Ecology of tropical dry forests in Madagascar. Eds. J. U. Ganzhorn and P. J. Sorg. Primate Ecology, 46: 311-327. Donald, D. G. M. & Theron, J. M. 1983. Temperate broad-leaved evergreen forests of Africa south of Sahara. In: Ecosystems of the World 10 - Temperate Broad-Leaved Evergreen Forests. Elsevier. Dorr, L. J. & Oliver, E. G. H. 1999. New taxa, names, and combinations in Erica (Ericaceae-Ericoideae) from Madagascar and the Comora Islands. Adansonia, ser. 3. 21: 75-91. Good, R. 1950. Madagascar and New Caledonia - a problem in plant geography. Blumea, 6: 470-490. Goodman, S. M. 1996. A floral and faunal inventory of the eastern slopes of the Reserve Naturale Integrale d' Andringitra, Madagascar. Fieldana: Zoology, N. S. No. 85: 1-319. Goodman, S. M. & Benstead, J. P. (eds). 2003. The Natural History of Madagascar. The University of Chicago Press. Humbert, H. 1962. Flore de Madagascar et des Comores - Composees. Tomes 1-3. Typographie Firmin-Didot. Jolly, A., Oberle, P. & Albignac, R. 1984. Key Environments Madagascar. Pergamon Press. Menaut, J. C. 1983. The Vegetation of the African Savannas. In: Ecosystems of the World 13 - Tropical Savannas. Ed. F. Bourliere. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company. Rakotonirina 1996. Composition and structure of the dry forests on sandy soils near Morondava. In: Ecology of tropical dry forests in Madagascar. Eds J. U. Ganzhorn and P. J. Sorg. Primate Ecology 46 (1): 311-327. Rauh, W. 1979. Problems of biological conservation in Madagascar. In: Plants and Islands. Ed. D. Bramwell. Academic Press. Rauh, W. 1986. Arid region of Madagascar. In: Ecosystems of the World 12B - Hot Deserts and Arid Shrubland, B. Eds. M. Evenari, I. Noy-Meir and D. W. Goodall. Elsevier. Copyright © 2010 Peter Martin Rhind Renvoize, S. A. 1979. The origins of Indian Ocean Island floras. In: Plants and Islands. Ed. D. Bramwell. Academic Press. Schatz, G. E. 2001. Generic Tree Flora of Madagascar. Royal Botanic Gardens Kew and Missouri Botanical Gardens. White, F. 1983. The Vegetation of Africa. UNESCO. Wild, H. 1975. Phytogeography and Gondwanaland position of Madagascar. Boissiera, 24: 107-117. Copyright © 2010 Peter Martin Rhind .
Recommended publications
  • Ecosystem Profile Madagascar and Indian

    Ecosystem Profile Madagascar and Indian

    ECOSYSTEM PROFILE MADAGASCAR AND INDIAN OCEAN ISLANDS FINAL VERSION DECEMBER 2014 This version of the Ecosystem Profile, based on the draft approved by the Donor Council of CEPF was finalized in December 2014 to include clearer maps and correct minor errors in Chapter 12 and Annexes Page i Prepared by: Conservation International - Madagascar Under the supervision of: Pierre Carret (CEPF) With technical support from: Moore Center for Science and Oceans - Conservation International Missouri Botanical Garden And support from the Regional Advisory Committee Léon Rajaobelina, Conservation International - Madagascar Richard Hughes, WWF – Western Indian Ocean Edmond Roger, Université d‘Antananarivo, Département de Biologie et Ecologie Végétales Christopher Holmes, WCS – Wildlife Conservation Society Steve Goodman, Vahatra Will Turner, Moore Center for Science and Oceans, Conservation International Ali Mohamed Soilihi, Point focal du FEM, Comores Xavier Luc Duval, Point focal du FEM, Maurice Maurice Loustau-Lalanne, Point focal du FEM, Seychelles Edmée Ralalaharisoa, Point focal du FEM, Madagascar Vikash Tatayah, Mauritian Wildlife Foundation Nirmal Jivan Shah, Nature Seychelles Andry Ralamboson Andriamanga, Alliance Voahary Gasy Idaroussi Hamadi, CNDD- Comores Luc Gigord - Conservatoire botanique du Mascarin, Réunion Claude-Anne Gauthier, Muséum National d‘Histoire Naturelle, Paris Jean-Paul Gaudechoux, Commission de l‘Océan Indien Drafted by the Ecosystem Profiling Team: Pierre Carret (CEPF) Harison Rabarison, Nirhy Rabibisoa, Setra Andriamanaitra,
  • Dry Forest Trees of Madagascar

    Dry Forest Trees of Madagascar

    The Red List of Dry Forest Trees of Madagascar Emily Beech, Malin Rivers, Sylvie Andriambololonera, Faranirina Lantoarisoa, Helene Ralimanana, Solofo Rakotoarisoa, Aro Vonjy Ramarosandratana, Megan Barstow, Katharine Davies, Ryan Hills, Kate Marfleet & Vololoniaina Jeannoda Published by Botanic Gardens Conservation International Descanso House, 199 Kew Road, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3BW, UK. © 2020 Botanic Gardens Conservation International ISBN-10: 978-1-905164-75-2 ISBN-13: 978-1-905164-75-2 Reproduction of any part of the publication for educational, conservation and other non-profit purposes is authorized without prior permission from the copyright holder, provided that the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holder. Recommended citation: Beech, E., Rivers, M., Andriambololonera, S., Lantoarisoa, F., Ralimanana, H., Rakotoarisoa, S., Ramarosandratana, A.V., Barstow, M., Davies, K., Hills, BOTANIC GARDENS CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL (BGCI) R., Marfleet, K. and Jeannoda, V. (2020). Red List of is the world’s largest plant conservation network, comprising more than Dry Forest Trees of Madagascar. BGCI. Richmond, UK. 500 botanic gardens in over 100 countries, and provides the secretariat to AUTHORS the IUCN/SSC Global Tree Specialist Group. BGCI was established in 1987 Sylvie Andriambololonera and and is a registered charity with offices in the UK, US, China and Kenya. Faranirina Lantoarisoa: Missouri Botanical Garden Madagascar Program Helene Ralimanana and Solofo Rakotoarisoa: Kew Madagascar Conservation Centre Aro Vonjy Ramarosandratana: University of Antananarivo (Plant Biology and Ecology Department) THE IUCN/SSC GLOBAL TREE SPECIALIST GROUP (GTSG) forms part of the Species Survival Commission’s network of over 7,000 Emily Beech, Megan Barstow, Katharine Davies, Ryan Hills, Kate Marfleet and Malin Rivers: BGCI volunteers working to stop the loss of plants, animals and their habitats.
  • First Steps Towards a Floral Structural Characterization of the Major Rosid Subclades

    First Steps Towards a Floral Structural Characterization of the Major Rosid Subclades

    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2006 First steps towards a floral structural characterization of the major rosid subclades Endress, P K ; Matthews, M L Abstract: A survey of our own comparative studies on several larger clades of rosids and over 1400 original publications on rosid flowers shows that floral structural features support to various degrees the supraordinal relationships in rosids proposed by molecular phylogenetic studies. However, as many apparent relationships are not yet well resolved, the structural support also remains tentative. Some of the features that turned out to be of interest in the present study had not previously been considered in earlier supraordinal studies. The strongest floral structural support is for malvids (Brassicales, Malvales, Sapindales), which reflects the strong support of phylogenetic analyses. Somewhat less structurally supported are the COM (Celastrales, Oxalidales, Malpighiales) and the nitrogen-fixing (Cucurbitales, Fagales, Fabales, Rosales) clades of fabids, which are both also only weakly supported in phylogenetic analyses. The sister pairs, Cucurbitales plus Fagales, and Malvales plus Sapindales, are structurally only weakly supported, and for the entire fabids there is no clear support by the present floral structural data. However, an additional grouping, the COM clade plus malvids, shares some interesting features but does not appear as a clade in phylogenetic analyses. Thus it appears that the deepest split within eurosids- that between fabids and malvids - in molecular phylogenetic analyses (however weakly supported) is not matched by the present structural data. Features of ovules including thickness of integuments, thickness of nucellus, and degree of ovular curvature, appear to be especially interesting for higher level relationships and should be further explored.
  • 583–584 Angiosperms 583 *Eudicots and Ceratophyllales

    583–584 Angiosperms 583 *Eudicots and Ceratophyllales

    583 583 > 583–584 Angiosperms These schedules are extensively revised, having been prepared with little reference to earlier editions. 583 *Eudicots and Ceratophyllales Subdivisions are added for eudicots and Ceratophyllales together, for eudicots alone Class here angiosperms (flowering plants), core eudicots For monocots, basal angiosperms, Chloranthales, magnoliids, see 584 See Manual at 583–585 vs. 600; also at 583–584; also at 583 vs. 582.13 .176 98 Mangrove swamp ecology Number built according to instructions under 583–588 Class here comprehensive works on mangroves For mangroves of a specific order or family, see the order or family, e.g., mangroves of family Combretaceae 583.73 .2 *Ceratophyllales Class here Ceratophyllaceae Class here hornworts > 583.3–583.9 Eudicots Class comprehensive works in 583 .3 *Ranunculales, Sabiaceae, Proteales, Trochodendrales, Buxales .34 *Ranunculales Including Berberidaceae, Eupteleaceae, Menispermaceae, Ranunculaceae Including aconites, anemones, barberries, buttercups, Christmas roses, clematises, columbines, delphiniums, hellebores, larkspurs, lesser celandine, mandrake, mayapple, mayflower, monkshoods, moonseeds, wolfsbanes For Fumariaceae, Papaveraceae, Pteridophyllaceae, see 583.35 See also 583.9593 for mandrakes of family Solanaceae .35 *Fumariaceae, Papaveraceae, Pteridophyllaceae Including bleeding hearts, bloodroot, celandines, Dutchman’s breeches, fumitories, poppies See also 583.34 for lesser celandine .37 *Sabiaceae * *Add as instructed under 583–588 1 583 Dewey Decimal Classification
  • Universite D'antananarivo Faculte Des Sciences

    Universite D'antananarivo Faculte Des Sciences

    UNIVERSITE D’ANTANANARIVO FACULTE DES SCIENCES DEPARTEME NT DE BIOLOGIE ET ECOLOGIE VEGETALES MEMOIRE POUR L’OBTENTION DU DIPLOME D’ETUDES APPROFONDIES EN BIOLOGIE ET ECOLOGIE VEGETALES Option : ECOLOGIE VEGETALE CARACTERISATION ECOLOGIQUE DE LA VEGETATION DANS LA PRESQU’ÎLE D’AMPASINDAVA, CAS DE LA FORÊ T DES MASSIFS DE BONGOMIRAHAVAVY et DE BET SITSIKA (DOMAINE DU SAMBIRANO), REGION DIANA Présenté par : TAHINARIVONY Andonahary Jacquis (Maître-ès Sciences) Soutenu publiquement le 13 Juillet 2010 devant la commission d’examen : Président : Pr RAJERIARISON Charlotte Rapporteurs : Dr ROGER Edmond Dr GAUTIER Laurent Examinateurs : Pr FARAMALALA Miadana Harisoa Dr RABARISON Harison ! S S$! % & S ! ! ! ( ) + ! , % - . S$ / ( ! % ! % ! & S ! / ! 1 $($2$($2% 3 - S. S$ % ! & +$ , S S ! ! 4 / 2)2)% - S. S$ % % ! ! & ! 4 ! ! ! & / 5 )$. 5 )$.% ( & ) S ! ! / S ! ! 4 % !! & ! ! ! ! ! ! & 6778/ ! 9 ! ! S ! S !! / : -$$$5$5$ : -$$$5$5$% 3 - S. S$ % $ ! & +$ , ! & / S ! S ! / : $$2 : $$2% - % ! ! ! / S ! ! & 4 S / ;S S ! ! /
  • Flowering Plant Systematics

    Flowering Plant Systematics

    Angiosperm Phylogeny Flowering Plant Systematics woody; vessels lacking dioecious; flw T5–8, A∞, G5–8, 1 ovule/carpel, embryo sac 9-nucleate 1 species, New Caledonia 1/1/1 Amborellaceae AMBORELLALES G A aquatic, herbaceous; cambium absent; aerenchyma; flw T4–12, A1–∞, embryo sac 4-nucleate seeds operculate with perisperm but endosperm reduced or small R mucilage; alkaloids (no benzylisoquinolines) 3/6/74 YMPHAEALES Cabombaceae Hydatellaceae Nymphaeaceae A N N woody, vessels solitary D flw T>10, A , G ca.9, embryo sac 4-nucleate ∞ Austrobaileyaceae Schisandraceae (incl. Illiciaceae) Trimeniaceae tiglic acid, aromatic terpenoids 3/5/100 E AUSTROBAILEYALES A lvs opposite, interpetiolar stipules flw small T0–3, A1–5, G1, 1 apical ovule/carpel A 1/4/75 Chloranthaceae E nodes swollen CHLORANTHALES N woody; foliar sclereids A K and C distinct G aromatic terpenoids 2/10/125 CANELLALES Canellaceae Winteraceae R idioblasts spherical in I nodes trilacunar ± herbaceous; lvs two-ranked, leaf base sheathing single adaxial prophyll L Aristolochiaceae (incl. Hydnoraceae) Piperaceae Saururaceae O nodes swollen 4/17/4170 IPERALES P Y sesquiterpenes S woody; lvs opposite flw with hypanthium, staminodes frequent Calycanthaceae Hernandiaceae Monimiaceae tension wood + wood tension (pellucid dots) (pellucid ethereal oils ethereal P anthers often valvate; carpels with 1 ovule; embryo large 7/91/2858 AURALES Gomortegaceae Lauraceae Siparunaceae L E MAGNOLIIDS woody; pith septate; lvs two-ranked ovules with obturator Annonaceae Eupomatiaceae Magnoliaceae endosperm
  • Ethnobotanical Study of the Medicinal Plants Known by Men in Ambalabe, Madagascar Aina D

    Ethnobotanical Study of the Medicinal Plants Known by Men in Ambalabe, Madagascar Aina D

    Ethnobotanical Study of the Medicinal Plants Known by Men in Ambalabe, Madagascar Aina D. Rabearivony, Alyse R. Kuhlman, Zo Lalaina Razafiarison, Fidèle Raharimalala, Fortunat Rakotoarivony, Tabita Randrianarivony, Nivo Rakotoarivelo, Armand Randrianasolo, and Rainer W. Bussmann Research Abstract Madagascar has high biodiversity and endemism that are cline in ecological and cultural knowledge regarding tra- threatened by growing human populations and climate ditional healing (Lyon & Hardesty 2005). Malagasy rural change. Species loss has potential impacts on traditional people are highly dependent on medicinal plants for their knowledge and community health. The aim of this project healthcare needs, particularly to treat infectious disease was to identify medicinal plants known and used by men (Randrianarivelojosia et al. 2003). Socio-economically, in the Commune of Ambalabe sourced from the Vohibe the practice of traditional medicine helps to meet certain Forest in eastern Madagascar. Interviews were conduct- needs of the local population (Rajerison 1999). Economi- ed that resulted in collection of 137 plant species used cally, local residents have difficulty accessing modern by men to treat illnesses, 35% of which are endemic to drugs because of their high costs. The use of traditional Madagascar. Twelve tree species were shown to have the medicine is cost effective as harvesting plants for thera- highest Use Index among the men in Ambalabe: Noronhia peutic use often costs significantly less than buying phar- gracilipes H.Perrier, Xylopia
  • Species of Baobab in Madagascar Rajeriarison, 2010 with 6 Endemics : Adansonia Grandidieri, A

    Species of Baobab in Madagascar Rajeriarison, 2010 with 6 Endemics : Adansonia Grandidieri, A

    FLORA OF MADAGASCAR Pr HERY LISY TIANA RANARIJAONA Doctoral School Naturals Ecosystems University of Mahajanga [email protected] Ranarijaona, 2014 O7/10/2015 CCI IVATO ANTANANARIVO Originality Madagascar = « megabiodiversity », with 5 % of the world biodiversity (CDB, 2014). originality et diversity with high endemism. *one of the 25 hot spots 7/9 species of Baobab in Madagascar Rajeriarison, 2010 with 6 endemics : Adansonia grandidieri, A. rubrostipa, A. za, A. madagascariensis, A. perrieri et A. suarezensis. Ranarijaona, 2013 Endemism Endemism : *species : 85 % - 90 % (CDB, 2014) *families : 02,46 % * genera : 20 à 25 % (SNB, 2012) *tree and shrubs (Schatz, 2001) : - familles : 48,54 % - genres : 32,85 % CDB, 2014 - espèces : 95,54 % RANARIJAONA, 2014 Families Genera Species ASTEROPEIACEAE 1 8 SPHAEROSEPALACEAE PHYSENACEAE 1 1 SARCOLAENACEAE 10 68 BARBEUIACEAE 1 1 PHYSENACEAE 1 2 RAJERIARISON, 2010 Archaism •DIDIEREACEAE in the south many affinities with the CACTACEAE confined in South America : Faucherea laciniata - Callophyllum parviflorum • Real living fossils species : * Phyllarthron madagascariensis : with segmented leaves * species of Dombeya : assymetric petales * genera endemic Polycardia, ex : P. centralis : inflorescences in nervation of the leaf * Takhtajania perrieri : Witness living on the existence of primitive angiosperms of the Cretaceous in Madagascar RAJERIARISON, 2010 Tahina spectabilis (Arecaceae) Only in the west of Madagascar In extinction (UICN, 2008) Metz, 2008) Inflorescence : ~4 m Estimation of the floristic richness (IUCN/UNEP/WWF, 1987; Koechlin et al., 1974; Callmander, 2010) Authors years Families Genera Species Perrier de la 1936 191 1289 7370 Bathie Humbert 1959 207 1280 10000 Leroy 1978 160 - 8200 White 1983 191 1200 8500 Guillaumet 1984 180 1600 12000 Phillipson et al.
  • Dryland Tree Data for the Southwest Region of Madagascar: Alpha-Level

    Dryland Tree Data for the Southwest Region of Madagascar: Alpha-Level

    Article in press — Early view MADAGASCAR CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT VOLUME 1 3 | ISSUE 01 — 201 8 PAGE 1 ARTICLE http://dx.doi.org/1 0.431 4/mcd.v1 3i1 .7 Dryland tree data for the Southwest region of Madagascar: alpha-level data can support policy decisions for conserving and restoring ecosystems of arid and semiarid regions James C. AronsonI,II, Peter B. PhillipsonI,III, Edouard Le Correspondence: Floc'hII, Tantely RaminosoaIV James C. Aronson Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 631 66-0299, USA Email: ja4201 [email protected] ABSTRACT RÉSUMÉ We present an eco-geographical dataset of the 355 tree species Nous présentons un ensemble de données éco-géographiques (1 56 genera, 55 families) found in the driest coastal portion of the sur les 355 espèces d’arbres (1 56 genres, 55 familles) présentes spiny forest-thickets of southwestern Madagascar. This coastal dans les fourrés et forêts épineux de la frange côtière aride et strip harbors one of the richest and most endangered dryland tree semiaride du Sud-ouest de Madagascar. Cette région possède un floras in the world, both in terms of overall species diversity and des assemblages d’arbres de climat sec les plus riches (en termes of endemism. After describing the biophysical and socio-eco- de diversité spécifique et d’endémisme), et les plus menacés au nomic setting of this semiarid coastal region, we discuss this re- monde. Après une description du cadre biophysique et de la situ- gion’s diverse and rich tree flora in the context of the recent ation socio-économique de cette région, nous présentons cette expansion of the protected area network in Madagascar and the flore régionale dans le contexte de la récente expansion du growing engagement and commitment to ecological restoration.
  • Bark Anatomy of Some Sarcolaenaceae And

    Bark Anatomy of Some Sarcolaenaceae And

    581.824.2:582.792.2 MEDEDELINGEN LANDBOUWHOGESCHOOL WAGENINGEN • NEDERLAND • 80-6(1980) BARKANATOM Y OF SOME SARCOLAENACEAE AND RHOPALOCARPACEAEAN DTHEI R SYSTEMATICPOSITIO N R. W.DE N OUTER and A. P. VOOREN Department ofBotany, Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands (Received 11-80) H. VEENMAN & ZONEN B.V.-WAGENINGEN-IS -•:;:;>QL TX BARK ANATOMY OFSOM ESARCOLAENACEA E AND RHOPALOCARPACEAE AND THEIR SYSTEMATIC POSITION. SUMMARY The secondary phloem of some representatives of the families Sarcolaenaceae (Chlaenaceae)an d Rhopalocarpaceae( Sphaerosepalaceae) endemi c to Madagas­ car, hasbee n compared with that offamilies , belonging to the orders Bixales and Tiliales (HUTCHINSON, 1973). Considering the bark only, the two autonomous families possess affinities with the Sterculiaceae, Bombacaceae and to someexten t withth e Tiliaceaeo f the Tiliales (sensu HUTCHINSON, 1973) or Malvales (sensu TAKHTAJAN, 1969), not with the Ochnales in which they were placed by HUTCHINSON (1973). So preference is given to TAKHTAJAN'S (1969) arrangement of the families within the Malvales; a position within the Ochnales (HUTCHINSON, 1973) seems doubtful. INTRODUCTION The Sarcolaenaceae, still known as Chlaenaceaei nmos t literature and Rhopa- locarpaceae also known as Sphaerosepalaceae, are small families of trees or shrubs endemic to Madagascar. Their systematic position is still uncertain. Formerly they have been placed separately indifferen t orders,th e Sarcolaenaceae inth e Malvales and the Rhopa- locarpaceae in the Parietales (Violales, Cistales). Afterwards they were both arranged in the Malvales (for instance TAKHTAJAN, 1969) and recently together in the Ochnales (HUTCHINSON, 1973). An investigation of the secondary phloem of some representatives of the two families and a comparison with some species from other families, might throw a new light on their mutual relation and systematic position.
  • 2 ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP (APG) SYSTEM History Of

    2 ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP (APG) SYSTEM History Of

    ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP (APG) SYSTEM The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group, or APG, refers to an informal international group of systematic botanists who came together to try to establish a consensus view of the taxonomy of flowering plants (angiosperms) that would reflect new knowledge about their relationships based upon phylogenetic studies. As of 2010, three incremental versions of a classification system have resulted from this collaboration (published in 1998, 2003 and 2009). An important motivation for the group was what they viewed as deficiencies in prior angiosperm classifications, which were not based on monophyletic groups (i.e. groups consisting of all the descendants of a common ancestor). APG publications are increasingly influential, with a number of major herbaria changing the arrangement of their collections to match the latest APG system. Angiosperm classification and the APG Until detailed genetic evidence became available, the classification of flowering plants (also known as angiosperms, Angiospermae, Anthophyta or Magnoliophyta) was based on their morphology (particularly that of the flower) and their biochemistry (what kinds of chemical compound they contained or produced). Classification systems were typically produced by an individual botanist or by a small group. The result was a large number of such systems (see List of systems of plant taxonomy). Different systems and their updates tended to be favoured in different countries; e.g. the Engler system in continental Europe; the Bentham & Hooker system in Britain (particularly influential because it was used by Kew); the Takhtajan system in the former Soviet Union and countries within its sphere of influence; and the Cronquist system in the United States.
  • Download Full Article in PDF Format

    Download Full Article in PDF Format

    Endemic families of Madagascar. II. A synoptic revision of Sphaerosepalaceae George E. SCHATZ Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, MO, 63166-0299, U.S.A. [email protected] Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, U.K. Porter P. LOWRY II Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, MO, 63166-0299, U.S.A. [email protected] Laboratoire de Phanérogamie, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, 16 rue Button, 75005 Paris, France. [email protected] Anne-Elizabeth WOLF Laboratoire de Phanérogamie, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, 16 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France. [email protected] ABSTRACT As part of an assessment of the vascular plant families endemic to Madagascar and the Comoro Islands, a synoptic revision is presented of Sphaerosepalaceae, comprising two genera, Dialyceras (3 spp.) and Rhopalocarpus (15 spp.). Molecular sequence data suggest the family's rela­ tionship to Bixaceae and Cochlospermaceae (and also perhaps to the Malagasy endemic Diegodendron) in an expanded Málvales. Critical study of available herbarium material shows the diagnostic value of vegetative charac­ ters for delimiting species, especially within Rhopalocarpus, in which two new combinations are made and five formerly recognized taxa are placed in syno­ nymy. All but five members of the family occur in the humid and subhumid KEYWORDS Sphaerosepalaceae, forests of eastern Madagascar, especially around the Bay of Antongil and on Dialyceras, the Masoala Peninsula, where all three Dialyceras and eight Rhopalocarpus Rhopalocarpus, have been recorded. Keys to the genera and species are provided in English Madagascar, endemism. and French. ADANSONIA, ser. 3 • 1999 • 21 (1) : 107-123 107 Schatz G.E., Lowry II P.P.