Lenin a Revolutionary Life
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2016 Annual Report
2016 Annual Report 209455_Annual Report.indd 1 8/4/17 9:56 AM Jewish Historical Society of Greater Washington LILLIAN AND ALBERT SMALL JEWISH MUSEUM 2016 Major Achievements The Society . • Held our last program in the Lillian & Albert Small Jewish Museum on the 140th anniversary of the historic 1876 synagogue. • Moved the synagogue 50 feet into the intersection of Third & G – the first step on its journey to a new home and the Society’s new Museum. • Received national coverage of the historic synagogue move from The Washington Post, The New York Times, Associated Press, and other news outlets. By the Numbers . • 17 youth programs served 451 students. • 3,275 adults participated in 81 programs at 30 venues. • 19 donors contributed more than 100 photographs, 30 boxes of archival documents, and 14 objects to the archives. • 70 historians, students, media outlets, organizations, and genealogists around the globe received answers to their research requests. • 34,094 website visits from 148 countries, 3,263 YouTube video views, and 1,281 Facebook fans. • 31 volunteers contributed more than 350 hours. The publication of this Annual Report was made possible, in part, with support from the Rosalie Fonoroff Endowment Fund. 209455_Annual Report.indd 2 8/4/17 9:56 AM 1 Leadership Message THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT OF OUR WORK IN 2016! hakespeare wrote that “What’s past is prologue,” describing Finally, we bid farewell to longtime Executive Director, Laura elegantly how history sets the context for the present. Apelbaum, who resigned after 22 years of committed service. SThe same maxim describes the point at which the Jewish During her tenure, the Society expanded its activities on every Historical Society of Greater Washington finds itself in 2017: level, gained a reputation for excellent programming and sound moving forward to design, finance and ultimately build a administration, and laid the groundwork for the successful wonderful new museum, archive, and venue for education, completion of the new museum. -
Employee Free Choice Act—Union Certification
S. HRG. 108–596 EMPLOYEE FREE CHOICE ACT—UNION CERTIFICATION HEARING BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION SPECIAL HEARING JULY 16, 2004—HARRISBURG, PA Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 95–533 PDF WASHINGTON : 2004 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS TED STEVENS, Alaska, Chairman THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico ERNEST F. HOLLINGS, South Carolina CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky TOM HARKIN, Iowa CONRAD BURNS, Montana BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama HARRY REID, Nevada JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire HERB KOHL, Wisconsin ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah PATTY MURRAY, Washington BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota LARRY CRAIG, Idaho DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois MIKE DEWINE, Ohio TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana JAMES W. MORHARD, Staff Director LISA SUTHERLAND, Deputy Staff Director TERRENCE E. SAUVAIN, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEPARTMENTS OF LABOR, HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, AND EDUCATION, AND RELATED AGENCIES ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania, Chairman THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi TOM HARKIN, Iowa JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire ERNEST F. -
Featherbedding on the Railroads: by Law and by Agreement·
Featherbedding on the Railroads: by Law and by Agreement· J.A. LlPOWSKI* I. INTRODUCTION The concept of "featherbedding"1 or make-work rules involves the conflict between two ideals: efficiency, usually necessary for the profit able operation of an enterprise, and job security, which is the desire of every worker and the hope of any union interested in maintaining its membership rolls. These conflicting ideals must be reconciled at some point. In the railroad industry, where the controversy over featherbedding has been most pronounced and the consequences most strongly felt, the carriers argue that the increased labor cost resulting from this practice is crippling the industry. In 1963 it was estimated that featherbedding . • BA, Lindenwood College; J.D., University of Tulsa College of Law, 1976. 1. Featherbedding has been defined as "[T]hose work rules which require the employ ment of more workers than needed for the job. In addition, when technological advances eliminate positions, unions often insist that the workers be retained and receive their regular pay tor doing nothing" A PARADIS, THE LABOR REFERENCE BOOK 71 (1972). The United States Departm'ent of Labor says that featherbedding is: a derogatory term applied to a practice, working rule, or agreement provision which limits output or requires employment of excess workers and thereby creates or preserves soft or unnecessary jobs; or to a charge or fee levied by a union upon a company for services which are not performed or not to be performed. U.S. DEPT. OF LABOR, BULL. No. 1438. GLOSSARY OF CURRENT INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS AND WAGE TERMS 31 (1965). -
GLOSSARY of COLLECTIVE BARGAINING TERMS and SELECTED LABOR TOPICS
GLOSSARY of COLLECTIVE BARGAINING TERMS and SELECTED LABOR TOPICS ABEYANCE – The placement of a pending grievance (or motion) by mutual agreement of the parties, outside the specified time limits until a later date when it may be taken up and processed. ACTION - Direct action occurs when any group of union members engage in an action, such as a protest, that directly exposes a problem, or a possible solution to a contractual and/or societal issue. Union members engage in such actions to spotlight an injustice with the goal of correcting it. It further mobilizes the membership to work in concerted fashion for their own good and improvement. ACCRETION – The addition or consolidation of new employees or a new bargaining unit to or with an existing bargaining unit. ACROSS THE BOARD INCREASE - A general wage increase that covers all the members of a bargaining unit, regardless of classification, grade or step level. Such an increase may be in terms of a percentage or dollar amount. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE – An agent of the National Labor Relations Board or the public sector commission appointed to docket, hear, settle and decide unfair labor practice cases nationwide or statewide in the public sector. They also conduct and preside over formal hearings/trials on an unfair labor practice complaint or a representation case. AFL-CIO - The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations is the national federation of unions in the United States. It is made up of fifty-six national and international unions, together representing more than 12 million active and retired workers. -
The Legal and Political Implications of Placing Paid Union Organizers in the Employer's Workplace Victor J
Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal Volume 16 | Issue 1 Article 1 1998 Salting the Mines: the Legal and Political Implications of Placing Paid Union Organizers in the Employer's Workplace Victor J. Van Bourg Ellyn Moscowitz Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlelj Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Van Bourg, Victor J. and Moscowitz, Ellyn (1998) "Salting the Mines: the Legal and Political Implications of Placing Paid Union Organizers in the Employer's Workplace," Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal: Vol. 16: Iss. 1, Article 1. Available at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlelj/vol16/iss1/1 This document is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Van Bourg and Moscowitz: Salting the Mines: the Legal and Political Implications of Placin HOFSTRA LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW JOURNAL Volume 16, No. 1 Fall 1998 ARTICLES SALTING THE MINES: THE LEGAL AND POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS OF PLACING PAID UNION ORGANIZERS IN THE EMPLOYER'S WORKPLACE* Victor J. Van Bourg** Ellyn Moscowitz*** Mr. Chairman .... Thank you for Mr. Chairman, I rise to strongly the opportunity to speak today. I oppose H.R. 3246, mistakenly am here to discuss the serious called the Fairness for Small Busi- * This article was made possible, in part, by a summer research grant from Chapman Uni- versity School of Law, while Ellyn Moscowitz was an Associate Professor of Law there. -
Exodus General Idea of the Revolution in the XXI Century
Exodus General Idea of the Revolution in the XXI Century Kevin A. Carson 2021 Contents Reviews 5 Abstract 6 Preface 7 Part One: Background 8 Chapter One: The Age of Mass and Maneuver 9 I. A Conflict of Visions .................................... 9 II. The Triumph of Mass in the Old Left .......................... 15 III. The Assault on Working Class Agency ......................... 42 IV. Workerism/Laborism .................................. 49 Chapter Two: Transition 52 I. Drastic Reductions in Necessary Outlays for the Means of Production . 52 II. The Network Revolution and the Imploding Cost of Coordination . 57 III. The Impotence of Enforcement, and Superiority of Circumvention to Resistance . 70 IV. Superior General Efficiency and Low Overhead .................... 74 V. Conclusion ......................................... 78 Part Two. The Age of Exodus 79 Chapter Three: Horizontalism and Self-Activity Over Vanguard Institutions 80 Introduction ......................................... 80 I. The New Left ........................................ 81 II. Autonomism ........................................ 90 III. The 1968 Movements and the Transition to Horizontalist Praxis . 98 IV. The Post-1994 Movements ................................ 100 Chapter Four: The Abandonment of Workerism 115 I. The Limited Relevance of Proletarianism in the Mass Production Age . 115 II. Technology and the Declining Relevance of Proletarianism . 116 III The Abandonment of Proletarianism by the New Left . 117 IV. The Abandonment of Workerism in Praxis . 127 Chapter Five: Evolutionary Transition Models 131 Introduction and Note on Terminology . 131 2 I. Comparison to Previous Systemic Transitions . 132 II. The Nature of Post-Capitalist Transition . 146 Chapter Six: Interstitial Development and Exodus over Insurrection 157 Introduction ......................................... 157 I. The Split Within Autonomism .............................. 159 II. The Shift From the Factory to Society as the Main Locus of Productivity . -
Lenin-S-Jewish-Question
Lenin’s Jewish Question Lenin’s Jewish Question YOHANAN PETROVSKY-SHTERN New Haven and London Published with assistance from the foundation established in memory of Amasa Stone Mather of the Class of 1907, Yale College. Copyright © 2010 by Yale University. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers. Yale University Press books may be purchased in quantity for educational, business, or promotional use. For information, please e-mail [email protected] (U.S. office) or [email protected] (U.K. office). Set in Minion type by Integrated Publishing Solutions. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Petrovskii-Shtern, Iokhanan. Lenin’s Jewish question / Yohanan Petrovsky-Shtern. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-300-15210-4 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Lenin, Vladimir Il’ich, 1870–1924—Relations with Jews. 2. Lenin, Vladimir Il’ich, 1870–1924—Family. 3. Ul’ianov family. 4. Lenin, Vladimir Il’ich, 1870–1924—Public opinion. 5. Jews— Identity—Case studies. 6. Jewish question. 7.Jews—Soviet Union—Social conditions. 8. Jewish communists—Soviet Union—History. 9. Soviet Union—Politics and government. I. Title. DK254.L46P44 2010 947.084'1092—dc22 2010003985 This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48–1992 (Permanence of Paper). -
The NLRB Takes Notice to the Max in Paramax Dennis M
Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal Volume 11 | Issue 1 Article 1 1993 The NLRB Takes Notice to the Max in Paramax Dennis M. Devaney Susan E. Kehoe Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlelj Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Devaney, Dennis M. and Kehoe, Susan E. (1993) "The NLRB Takes Notice to the Max in Paramax," Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal: Vol. 11: Iss. 1, Article 1. Available at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlelj/vol11/iss1/1 This document is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Devaney and Kehoe: The NLRB Takes Notice to the Max in Paramax HOFSTRA LABOR LAW JOURNAL Volume 11, No. 1 Fall 1993 ARTICLES THE NLRB TAKES NOTICE TO THE MAX IN PARAMAX Dennis M. Devaney with Susan E. Kehoe*" I. OVERVIEW A. Paramax and its Significance In a departure from the traditional interpretation of Section 8(b)(1)(A) of the National Labor Relations Act,' the National Labor * BA., M.A., University of Maryland; J.D., Georgetown University; Member, National Labor Relations Board. ** BA., Trinity College; M.A., ID., Tulane University; Assistant Chief Counsel to Member Dennis M. Devaney of the National Labor Relations Board. 1. Section 8(b)(1)(A) of the National Labor Relations Act provides that- [i]t shall be an unfair labor practice for a labor organization or its agents - (1) to restrain or coerce (A) employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in Section 7: Provided, That this paragraph shall not impair the right of a labor orga- nization to prescribe its own rules with respect to the acquisition or retention of Published by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law, 1993 1 Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal, Vol. -
Demise of the Featherbedding Epoch in the Railroad Industry
University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1965 Demise of the featherbedding epoch in the railroad industry Jerome Paul Anderson The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Anderson, Jerome Paul, "Demise of the featherbedding epoch in the railroad industry" (1965). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 4853. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/4853 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ' f f t i I$S5XSK OF fHH SiPOOI * m” - * 988 :T^TIPI ^.! ™ •S*-1 -r * mmstm'WJ^rOf *&‘wT.<t."^> m m m m m . m m m M * Jfettfctttft S ta te tf^ ve ys£ % * 1963 f^senfeeiS In. ;pavt£el & 3f& 3tott$ of the- r«qai#^se3rit0 ffev tha degro© of m&%®r of $ii«<so . SMftARA $9A9$ 8819M t t m tsjr* /, APR 2 7 1965 UMI Number: EP40317 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. -
Institute for the Study of Modern Israel ~ISMI~
Institute for the Study of Modern Israel ~ISMI~ November 10 – 11, 2018 Atlanta, Georgia ISMI.EMORY.EDU 1 2 Welcome to the 20th Anniversary Celebration of the Emory Institute for the Study of Modern Israel (ISMI). SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2018 1:30pm-1:45pm Opening Remarks (Ken Stein) 1:45pm-2:45pm Israel: 1948-2018 A Look Back to the Future (Asher Susser, Yitzhak Reiter, Yaron Ayalon, Rachel Fish, Ken Stein-moderator) 2:45pm-3:00pm Break 3:00pm-4:15pm Israel and its Neighborhood (Alan Makovsky, Jonathan Schanzer, Joel Singer, Asher Susser-moderator) 4:15pm-5:30pm US Foreign Policy toward Israel (Todd Stein, Alan Makovsky, Jonathan Schanzer, Ken Stein-moderator) 5:30pm-6:00pm Break 6:00pm-6:45pm Wine Reception 6:45pm-7:45pm ISMI at Emory: Impact on Emory College, Atlanta and Beyond (Introductory Remarks by Ambassador Judith Varnai Shorer, Consul General of Israel to the Southeastern United States, Michael Elliott, Dov Wilker, Lois Frank, Joshua Newton, Jay Schaefer, Ken Stein-moderator) 7:45pm-8:45pm Dinner 9:00pm-10:00pm Musical Performance by Aveva Dese with Introduction by Eli Sperling 10:30pm-midnight AFTER HOURS Reading Sources and Shaping Narratives: 1978 Camp David Accords (Ken Stein) SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 2018 7:00am-8:30am Breakfast 8:30am-9:30am Israel and the American Jewish Community (Allison Goodman, Jonathan Schanzer, Alan Makovsky, Ken Stein-moderator) 9:30am-10:30am Reflections of Israel Learning at Emory (Dana Pearl, Jay Schaefer, Mitchell Tanzman, Yaron Ayalon, Yitzhak Reiter, Ken Stein-moderator) 10:30am-10:45am Break 10:45am-11:30am Foundations, Donors, and Israel Studies (Stacey Popovsky, Rachel Fish, Dan Gordon, Ken Stein-moderator) 11:30am-12:30pm One-state, two states, something else? (Rachel Fish, Yitzhak Reiter, Joel Singer, Jonathan Schanzer, Ken Stein-moderator) 12:30pm-12:45pm Closing Remarks - ISMI’s Future and What’s Next 12:45pm Box Lunch 3 Full Agenda - Saturday November 10, Saturday – 1:30pm-1:45pm Opening Remarks Welcoming thoughts about our two days of learning. -
A GENEALOGICAL MIRACLE - Thanks to the Jewish Agency Arlene Blank Rich
cnrechw YCO" " g g-2 "& rgmmE CO +'ID pbP g " 6 p.ch 0"Y 3YW GS € cno I cl+. P. 3 k. $=& L-CDP 90a3-a Y3rbsP gE$$ (o OSN eo- ZQ 3 (Dm rp,7r:J+. 001 PPP wr.r~Rw eY o . 0"CD Co r+ " ,R Co CD w4a nC 1 -4 Q r up, COZ - YWP I ax Z Q- p, P. 3 3 CD m~ COFO 603" 2 %u"d~. CD 5 mcl3Q r. I= E-35 3s-r.~E Y e7ch g$g", eEGgCD CD rSr(o Coo CO CO3m-i-I V"YUN$ '=z CD Eureka was finding that her maiden name was MARK- at the age of 27 to GROSZ JULISKA, age 18. TOLEVOT: THE JOURNAL Of JEWISH GENEALOGY TOLEPOT is the Hebrew word for "genealogyw OVICS MARI. The last column of the register It is difficult to understand why two bro- or llgenerations. " showed that my great-uncle had petitioned to have thers should change their names and why one should 155 East 93 Street, Suite 3C TOLEDOT disclaims responsibility for errors his name changed to VAJDA SAMUEL, which my father choose VAJDA and the other SALGO. My cousin wrote New York, NY 10028 of fact or opinion made by contributors told me about in 1946 when I first became inter- that all she knew about our great-grandparents is but does strive for maximum accuracy. ested in my genealogy. that they were murdered in the town of Beretty6Gj- Arthur Kurzweil Steven W. Siege1 Interested persons are invited to submit arti- In the birth register for the year 1889, I falu. -
Featherbedding”: Under the Nlra and Under Your Collective Bargaining Agreement
ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF AMERICA LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW COUNCIL 28TH ANNUAL CONSTRUCTION LABOR LAW SYMPOSIUM WASHINGTON, D.C. APRIL 19-20, 2012 WHAT IS “FEATHERBEDDING”: UNDER THE NLRA AND UNDER YOUR COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT Presented By: WILLIAM BEVAN III REED SMITH LLP 225 Fifth Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222 (412) 288-3184 Fax: (412) 288-3063 Website: www.reedsmith.com Email: [email protected] WHAT IS “FEATHERBEDDING”: UNDER THE NLRA AND UNDER YOUR COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT William Bevan III* What is “featherbedding.” The popular notion is that featherbedding represents a situation where an employer pays employees for work it does not want or need. Most dictionary definitions confirm this, even specialized ones.1 Nevertheless, as this paper will show, the legal definition under the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA” or “Act”) is narrower, and no pun intended, more exacting than commonly held perceptions of what constitutes featherbedding. Featherbedding as regulated under Section 8(b)(6)2 of the Act is limited to very specific situations that comport with the language of the statute but not with what the public perceives should be condemned as featherbedding. It is, perhaps, only in the arbitration world where more common notions of what constitutes featherbedding are likely to prevail. This paper will explore the legislative history of * Partner, Reed Smith LLP, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The views expressed here are mine alone and do not represent the views of Reed Smith LLP or the Associated General Contractors of America. 1 Featherbedding – (The action of) making comfortable by favourable, esp. economic or financial, treatment; the state of being so treated; spec.