DOCSLIB.ORG

Interim Financial Statement for 1996; Status of the Payment of Contributions on July 1, 1997

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

AB/XXXI/5 ORIGINAL: English WIPO DATE: August 29, 1997 WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION GENEVA GOVERNING BODIES OF WIPO AND THE UNIONS ADMINISTERED BY WIPO Thirty-First Series of Meetings Geneva, September 22 to October 1, 1997 ACTIVITIES FROM JANUARY 1 TO JUNE 30, 1997; INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENT FOR 1996; STATUS OF THE PAYMENT OF CONTRIBUTIONS ON JULY 1, 1997 Report of the Director General n:\postoff\menezes\govbody\intro.doc AB/XXXI/5 page i INTRODUCTION The present document consists of three Parts: Part I, Activities from January 1 to June 30, 1997; Part II, Interim Financial Statement for 1996; and Part III, Status of the Payment of Contributions on July 1, 1997. The full names of the organizations, etc., designated by their acronyms are indicated in Annex E of this document. It is to be noted that, as concerns the reporting on activities, the September-October 1997 sessions of the WIPO Governing Bodies will have before them not only the present document but also two other documents, namely: (i) a document dealing with the activities of the calendar year 1996 (document AB/XXXI/4); (ii) a document summarizing, on 14 pages, the activities of the 18 months from January 1996 to June 1997 (document AB/XXXI/6), that is, the period which, in detail, is covered by document AB/XXXI/4 and the present document. n:\postoff\menezes\govbody\contents.doc AB/XXXI/5 page ii CONTENTS Paragraphs Introduction PART I: ACTIVITIES FROM JANUARY 1 TO JUNE 30, 1997 1 - 1000 Chapter I: Activities of the Governing Bodies and their Committees 1 - 17 Governing Bodies 1 - 11 Budget and Premises Committees 12 - 17 Chapter II: Development Cooperation Activities 18 - 706 Development of Human Resources 20 - 418 Africa 20 - 124 Arab Countries 125 - 168 Asia and the Pacific 169 - 298 Latin America and the Caribbean 299 - 418 Development of National and Regional Legislation and its Enforcement; Institution Building; Adherence to WIPO-Administered Treaties 419 - 693 Africa 419 - 481 Arab Countries 482 - 538 Asia and the Pacific 539 - 624 Latin America and the Caribbean 625 - 693 Other Development Cooperation Activities 694 - 706 Interregional Sectoral Support 694 Development, in Developing Countries, of Access to the Technological Information Contained in Patent Documents and its Dissemination 695 - 699 WIPO Medals for Inventors 700 - 706 Chapter III: Normative and Other Activities for the Improvement of the Legal Protection of Intellectual Property 707 - 739 Protection of Folklore 708 - 710 Broadcasting and New Communication Technologies 711 - 715 Digital Technology and Copyright 716 - 722 The Proposed Patent Law Treaty 723 - 729 Recording and Indicating Trademark Licenses 730 - 733 Trademarks and Internet Domain Names 734 - 736 Business Identifiers 737 n:\postoff\menezes\govbody\contents.doc AB/XXXI/5 page iii Paragraphs Names and Emblems of Non-Profit Organizations 738 Inventions Made or Used in Outer Space 739 Chapter IV: International Classification and Standardization Activities 740 - 770 WIPO Permanent Committee on Industrial Property Information (PCIPI) 742 - 763 International Patent Classification Union 764 - 768 Nice Union for the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks 769 - 770 Chapter V: International Registration Activities 771 - 831 PCT System (Patent Cooperation Treaty) 772 - 802 New Contracting States 772 - 773 Statistics 774 - 782 Automation 783 - 785 Publications 786 - 793 Training and Promotion 794 - 795 Development of the PCT System 796 - 802 Madrid System (International Registration of Marks) 803 - 822 New Adherences; Membership in the Madrid System 803 - 805 Statistics 806 - 807 Automation 808 - 810 Publications 811 - 816 Training and Promotion 817 - 821 Development of the Madrid System 822 Hague System (International Deposit of Industrial Designs) 823 - 831 New Contracting States 823 Statistics 824 - 825 Automation 826 Publications 827 - 828 Training and Promotion 829 - 830 Development of the Hague System 831 Chapter VI: Arbitration and Mediation Activities 832 - 843 Arbitrators and Mediators 833 Training and Promotion 834 - 840 Internet Domain Name Disputes 841 Publications 842 - 843 n:\postoff\menezes\govbody\contents.doc AB/XXXI/5 page iv Paragraphs Chapter VII: Activities for the Promotion of the Worldwide Recognition of and Respect for Intellectual Property 844 - 1000 Adherences to Treaties 846 - 847 Activities Specially Designed for Countries in Transition to Market Economy 848 Contacts with the Governments of Individual Countries Other than Developing Countries 849 - 883 Cooperation with the United Nations System of Organizations 884 - 899 Cooperation with the World Trade Organization (WTO) 900 - 915 Cooperation with Other Intergovernmental Organizations 916 - 935 Cooperation with Non-Governmental Organizations and Universities 936 - 982 Visits of the Director General 983 Missions of WIPO Staff 984 Publications 985 - 995 Public Information 996 - 1000 PART II: INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENT FOR 1996 1001 PART III: STATUS OF THE PAYMENT OF CONTRIBUTIONS ON JULY 1, 1997 1002 - 1007 DECISIONS INVITED 1008 ANNEXES ANNEX A. WIPO Development Cooperation Activities between January 1 and June 30, 1997: Beneficiary and Contributing Countries and Organizations ANNEX B. Meetings Organized by WIPO between January 1 and June 30, 1997 ANNEX C. WIPO Publications Issued between January 1 and June 30, 1997 ANNEX D. Current Information Technology Activities of the International Bureau of WIPO (Memorandum of the International Bureau prepared for the first session of the WIPO Working Group on Information Technologies for Intellectual Property (Geneva, July 14 to 18, 1997)) ANNEX E. Acronyms Used in the Present Document ANNEX F. Index of Countries and Territories, and Certain Intergovernmental Organizations n:\postoff\menezes\govbody\contents.doc AB/XXXI/5 page 3 PART I: ACTIVITIES FROM JANUARY 1 TO JUNE 30, 1997 CHAPTER I: ACTIVITIES OF THE GOVERNING BODIES AND THEIR COMMITTEES Governing Bodies 1. The WIPO Coordination Committee held its thirty-seventh session (10th extraordinary) in Geneva on March 18 and 19. The following 66 member States of the Committee were represented at the meeting: ANGOLA, ARGENTINA, AUSTRALIA, AUSTRIA, BELGIUM, BRAZIL, BRUNEI DARUSSALAM, BURKINA FASO, CAMEROON, CANADA, CHILE, CHINA, COLOMBIA, CÔTE D’IVOIRE, CUBA, CZECH REPUBLIC, DENMARK, EGYPT, EL SALVADOR, FINLAND, FRANCE, GERMANY, GHANA, GREECE, GUATEMALA, HUNGARY, INDIA, INDONESIA, IRELAND, ITALY, JAPAN, KAZAKSTAN, KENYA, MEXICO, MOROCCO, NETHERLANDS, NEW ZEALAND, NIGERIA, NORWAY, PAKISTAN, PANAMA, PARAGUAY, PERU, PHILIPPINES, PORTUGAL, REPUBLIC OF KOREA, ROMANIA, RUSSIAN FEDERATION, SINGAPORE, SLOVENIA, SOUTH AFRICA, SPAIN, SRI LANKA, SUDAN, SWAZILAND, SWEDEN, SWITZERLAND, THAILAND, TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO, TUNISIA, UKRAINE, UNITED KINGDOM, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, URUGUAY, VENEZUELA, ZAMBIA. 2. The substantive item on the agenda of the Coordination Committee was the nomination to the post of Director General of WIPO. Ten candidatures had been received. 3. The Coordination Committee decided to nominate Mr. Kamil Idris f or appointment to the post of Director General by the General Assembly of WIPO. 4. Mr. Idris is a national of Sudan. He is, since 1994, Deputy Director General of WIPO. The appointment itself is expected to be made by the General Assembly in September 1997. —. — 5. The following three Governing Bodies of WIPO held their thirtieth series of meetings in Geneva on March 20 and 21: WIPO General Assembly, twentieth session (8th extraordinary); WIPO Coordination Committee, thirty-eighth session (11th extraordinary); Berne Union Assembly, twenty-first session (9th extraordinary). 6. The following 95 States and seven intergovernmental organizations were represented at the meetings: ALGERIA, ANDORRA, ARGENTINA, AUSTRALIA, AUSTRIA, BELGIUM, BENIN, BRAZIL, BRUNEI DARUSSALAM, BULGARIA, BURKINA FASO, CAMEROON, CANADA, CHILE, CHINA, COLOMBIA, COSTA RICA, CÔTE D’IVOIRE, CROATIA, CUBA, CYPRUS, CZECH REPUBLIC, DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF KOREA, DENMARK, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC, ECUADOR, EGYPT, EL SALVADOR, ERITREA, FINLAND, FRANCE, GABON, GERMANY, GHANA, GREECE, HOLY SEE, HUNGARY, INDIA, INDONESIA, IRELAND, ISRAEL, ITALY, JAMAICA, JAPAN, KENYA, KYRGYZSTAN, LATVIA, LESOTHO, LIBYA, LITHUANIA, LUXEMBOURG, MALAWI, MALAYSIA, MALI, MALTA, MEXICO, MOROCCO, NETHERLANDS, n:\postoff\actrep.doc AB/XXXI/5 page 4 NIGERIA, NORWAY, OMAN, PAKISTAN, PANAMA, PARAGUAY, PERU, PHILIPPINES, POLAND, PORTUGAL, REPUBLIC OF KOREA, REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA, ROMANIA, RUSSIAN FEDERATION, SAUDI ARABIA, SINGAPORE, SLOVAKIA, SLOVENIA, SOUTH AFRICA, SPAIN, SRI LANKA, SUDAN, SWAZILAND, SWEDEN, SWITZERLAND, THAILAND, THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA, TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO, TUNISIA, UKRAINE, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES, UNITED KINGDOM, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, URUGUAY, VENEZUELA, VIET NAM, YEMEN, CEC, ILO, ITU, OAU, UNESCO, WMO, WTO. 7. As regards preparatory work on a protocol concerning audiovisual performances and a treaty concerning intellectual property in databases, the Governing Bodies decided that (i) a Committee of Experts on the protocol concerning audiovisual performances would be convened for September 15 and 16, 1997, and an Information Meeting concerning intellectual property in databases would be convened for September 17 and 18. The following day, September 19, would be reserved for the adoption of the reports of both the Committee of Experts and the Information Meeting; (ii) the International Bureau would, separately for each
Recommended publications
  • FIGHTING CORRUPTION Incriminations

    FIGHTING CORRUPTION Incriminations

    FIGHTING CORRUPTION Incriminations by Mr Roderick MACAULEY Criminal law adviser at the Ministry of Justice of the United Kingdom Thematic Review of GRECO’s Third Evaluation Round For further information, GRECO Secretariat Directorate General I - Human Rights and Rule of Law Council of Europe F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex Tel.: + 33 (0)3 88 41 30 43 Fax: + 33 (0)3 88 41 39 55 www.coe.int/greco www.coe.int PREMS 67012 FIGHTING CORRUPTION Incriminations by Mr Roderick MACAULEY Criminal Law adviser at the Ministry of Justice of the United Kingdom Thematic review of GRECO’s Third Evaluation Round Contents Introduction ........................................................ 5 General themes and observations ...................... 9 Specific Themes ................................................ 20 Public/private distinctions ..................................... 20 Public Official ...................................................... 20 Exercise of functions ............................................ 23 Autonomous offences ........................................... 26 Elemental Deficiencies and Consistency .................. 28 Undue advantage ................................................ 31 Private Sector ..................................................... 35 Trading in influence .............................................. 39 Bribery of foreign and international actors ............... 43 ETS No. 191 (Jurors and Arbitrators) ...................... 45 Extra-territorial jurisdiction ................................... 47 Sanctions ..........................................................
  • Fetishizing Copies

    Fetishizing Copies

    University of Michigan Law School University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository Book Chapters Faculty Scholarship 2017 Fetishizing Copies Jessica Litman University of Michigan Law School, [email protected] Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/book_chapters/108 Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/book_chapters Part of the Computer Law Commons, Consumer Protection Law Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, Legislation Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Publication Information & Recommended Citation Litman, Jessica D. "Fetishizing Copies." In Copyright in An Age of Limitations and Exceptions, edited by R. Okediji, 107-31. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2017. This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Book Chapters by an authorized administrator of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 3 Fetishizing Copies Jessica Litman * Abstract Our copyright laws encourage authors to create new works and communicate them to the public, because we hope that people will read the books, listen to the music, see the art, watch the f lms, run the software, and build and inhabit the buildings. That is the way that copyright promotes the Progress of Science. Recently, that not-very- controversial principle has collided with copyright owners’ conviction that they should be able to control, or at least collect royalties from, all uses of their works. A particularly ill-considered manifestation of this conviction is what I have decided to call copy- fetish.
  • Copyright, Digitization of Images, and Art Museums: Cyberspace and Other New Frontiers

    Copyright, Digitization of Images, and Art Museums: Cyberspace and Other New Frontiers

    UCLA UCLA Entertainment Law Review Title Copyright, Digitization of Images, and Art Museums: Cyberspace and Other New Frontiers Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/34s442ws Journal UCLA Entertainment Law Review, 6(2) ISSN 1073-2896 Author Appel, Sharon Publication Date 1999 DOI 10.5070/LR862026984 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Copyright, Digitization of Images, and Art Museums: Cyberspace and Other New Frontiers Sharon Appel* "[W]hile I shall think myself bound to secure every man in the enjoyment of his copy-right, one must not put manacles upon science." Lord Ellenborough, Carey v. Kearsley, 4 Esp. 168, 170, 170 Eng.Rep. 679, 681 (K.B.1803) I. IN TR O DU CTIO N .......................................................................... 151 II.THE LAW OF COPYRIGHT ......................................................... 154 A. Historical Origins of Copyright Law ................................. 154 B. Constitutional and Philosophical Underpinnings of C opyright Law ................................................................... 157 C. The Copyright Act of 1790 ................................................. 158 D. The Copyright Act of 1909 ................................................ 159 E. The Copyright Act of 1976 ................................................. 161 1. Threshold Requirements for Copyright Protection. 162 B.A. University of Wisconsin-Madison; J.D. Brooklyn Law School; Certificate, Graduate Program in Museum Studies, George Washington University. Former staff attorney and hearing officer, Telecommunications, Vermont Public Service Board. E-mail: [email protected]. Many thanks to Ralph Oman for his encouragement, enthusiasm, and advice. Thanks also to Jeffrey Hannigan, Ildiko P. DeAngelis, and Ellen Zavian for their comments upon earlier drafts, and to Craig Rutenberg for his flexibility and humor. I dedicate this article to my parents, Rose and Carl Appel. UCLA ENTERTAINMENT LAW REVIEW [Vol 6:2 2.
  • Section 512 of Title 17 a Report of the Register of Copyrights May 2020 United States Copyright Office

    Section 512 of Title 17 a Report of the Register of Copyrights May 2020 United States Copyright Office

    united states copyright office section 512 of title 17 a report of the register of copyrights may 2020 united states copyright office section 512 of title 17 a report of the register of copyrights may 2020 U.S. Copyright Office Section 512 Report ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The publication of this Report is the final output of several years of effort by the Copyright Office to assist Congress with evaluating ways to update the Copyright Act for the 21st century. The genesis of this Report occurred in the midst of the two years of copyright review hearings held by the House Judiciary Committee that spanned the 113th and 114th Congresses. At the twentieth and final hearing in April 2015, the Copyright Office proposed several policy studies to aid Congress in its further review of the Copyright Act. Two studies already underway at the time were completed after the hearings: Orphan Works and Mass Digitization (2015), which the Office later supplemented with a letter to Congress on the “Mass Digitization Pilot Program” (2017), and The Making Available Right in the United States (2016). Additional studies proposed during the final hearing that were subsequently issued by the Office included: the discussion document Section 108 of Title 17 (2017), Section 1201 of Title 17 (2017), and Authors, Attribution, and Integrity: Examining Moral Rights in the United States (2019). The Office also evaluated how the current copyright system works for visual artists, which resulted in the letter to Congress titled “Copyright and Visual Works: The Legal Landscape of Opportunities and Challenges” (2019). Shortly after the hearings ended, two Senators requested a review of the role of copyright law in everyday consumer products and the Office subsequently published a report, Software-Enabled Computer Products (2016).
  • Register of Copyr1ght.S

    Register of Copyr1ght.S

    SIXTY-NINTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE REGISTER OF COPYR1GHT.S FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1966 COPYRIGHT OFFICE THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS IL.C. Card No. 10-36017 This report is reprinted from the Annual Report of the Libdnof Congreee for the fiscal year ending June 30,1966 Contents THECOPYRIGHT OFFICE ............................ 1 The Year's Copyright Business ......................... 2 Official publications .............................. 4 Copyright Contributions to the Library of Congress ................ 4 Administrative Developments ........................... 4 Problems of Registrability ........................... 5 Organizational Problems ............................ 5 Notices of Intention To Use ...................... : ... 5 Legislative Developments ............................ 6 Judicial Developments ..............................8 Performing Rights and Community Antenna Systems ............... 8 Rights of Exhibition and Copying ....................... 10 Author's "Moral Right" ........................... 11 Subject Matter of Copyright ......................... 13 Publication ................................. 16 Notice of Copyright ............................. 17 Copyright Registration ............................ 19 Ownership. Assignment. and Renewal of Copyright ............... 21 Infringement and Remedies .........................23 Other Judicial Developments .........................26 International Developments .......................... 28 Tables: International Copyright Relations of the United States as of December
  • Exceptions and Limitations to Intellectual Property Rights with Special Reference to Patent and Copyright Law

    Exceptions and Limitations to Intellectual Property Rights with Special Reference to Patent and Copyright Law

    EXCEPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO PATENT AND COPYRIGHT LAW Thesis submitted to Cochiin Uniiversiity of Sciience and Technollogy for the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Faculty of Law By SALEENA K. B Under the guidance of Prof. Dr. N. S. GOPALAKRISHNAN (Director, IUCIPRS, CUSAT) SCHOOL OF LEGAL STUDIES COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COCHIN-682 022 2011 School of Legal Studies Cochin University of Science and Technology Kochi – 682 022, Kerala, India Ph: 91-484-2862487 (O), 2577542 (R) Prof. Dr. N. S. GOPALAKRISHNAN Fax: 91-484-2575463(Direct), 2577595 Professor HRD Chair on IPR E-mail:[email protected] ; [email protected] This is to certify that this thesis entitled “Exceptions and Limitations to Intellectual Property Rights with Special Reference to Patent and Copyright Law” submitted by Ms. Saleena K.B for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, is to the best of my knowledge, the record of bonafide research carried out under my guidance and supervision from 13.09.2006 at School of Legal Studies, Cochin University of Science and Technology. This thesis or any part thereof has not been submitted elsewhere for any other degree. Cochin Dr. N. S. Gopalakrishnan 19/10/2011 (Research Guide) This is to certify that the important research findings included in the thesis entitled “Exceptions and Limitations to Intellectual Property Rights with Special Reference to Patent and Copyright Law” have been presented in a research seminar at School of legal Studies, Cochin University of Science and technology on 2nd May 2011.
  • Making Cyberspace Safe for Copyright: the Protection of Electronic Works in a Protocol to the Berne Convention

    Making Cyberspace Safe for Copyright: the Protection of Electronic Works in a Protocol to the Berne Convention

    Fordham International Law Journal Volume 18, Issue 4 1994 Article 9 Making Cyberspace Safe for Copyright: The Protection of Electronic Works in a Protocol to the Berne Convention Robert A. Cinque∗ ∗ Copyright c 1994 by the authors. Fordham International Law Journal is produced by The Berke- ley Electronic Press (bepress). http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj Making Cyberspace Safe for Copyright: The Protection of Electronic Works in a Protocol to the Berne Convention Robert A. Cinque Abstract This Note discusses the prevalence of copywrited material on the internet, and the increasing access to said material. The Berne Convention is the leading international agreement to protect this type of material, though its reach and efficacy are limited. Provisions of the Convention are not stringently enforced. The Note explores the costs and benefits of enforcement, and potential protocols or policies to be adopted. NOTES MAKING CYBERSPACE SAFE FOR COPYRIGHT: THE PROTECTION OF ELECTRONIC WORKS IN A PROTOCOL TO THE BERNE CONVENTION Robert A. Cinque* It is... in the nature of things that the work of man's genius, once it has seen the light, can no longer be restricted to one country and to one nationality. That is why... the imperative necessity has been shown of protecting [authors' rights] in international relations.** INTRODUCTION Telecommunications1 and the "information superhighway"' facilitate instantaneous mobility of literary and artistic works in the form of text, video, and audio recordings.' With the click of a mouse or the tap of a key, virtually anyone with a computer and a telephone can obtain vast quantities of information from almost anywhere on the globe.' These conditions pose a * J.D.
  • Legal Research Methods

    Legal Research Methods

    chilot.wordpress.com Legal Research Methods Teaching Material Prepared by: Prof (Dr) Khushal Vibhute & Filipos Aynalem Prepared under the Sponsorship of the Justice and Legal System Research Institute 2009 chilot.wordpress.com TABLE OF CONTENTS UNIT 1: INTRODUCTION-------------------------------------------------------------------1 1.1 Introduction--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2 1.2 Law and Society: Mutual Relationship & Interaction-----------------------------------------------------3 1.3 Legal System: A System of Norms and Social System?---------------------------------------------------4 1.4 Role of Law in A Planned Socio-Economic Development------------------------------------------------6 UNIT 2: LEGAL RESEARCH: AN INTRODUCTION----------------------------------8 2.1 What is research?-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------10 2.1.1 Meaning of research---------------------------------------------------------------------------------10 2.1.2 Objectives of research-------------------------------------------------------------------------------12 2.1.3 Motivation in research------------------------------------------------------------------------------13 2.1.4 Research and scientific method-------------------------------------------------------------------14 2.2 Types of research------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------15 2.2.1 Descriptive vs. Analytical Research
  • Annual Intellectual Property Report to Congress

    Annual Intellectual Property Report to Congress

    ANNUAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REPORT TO CONGRESS March 2020 * * * UNITED STATES INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR IPEC ANNUAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REPORT TO CONGRESS: This report is submitted pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §8114. During the past three years, President Trump and his Administration have worked to promote strong intellectual property rights protection and enforcement, both domestically and abroad. As part of an integrated approach, the Trump Administration views our intellectual property strategy, policy and enforcement efforts, together, as key to helping secure the future of our innovative economy and to maintaining our competitive advantage. The Trump Administration’s Annual Intellectual Property Report to Congress, developed by the Office of the U.S. Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator, brings together the combined and coordinated efforts of the White House, the Departments of Commerce, Justice, Homeland Security, State, Treasury, Defense, Health and Human Services, and Agriculture, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, and the U.S. Copyright Office. This report was originally mandated to be submitted by the U.S. Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator over a decade ago by the Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property Act of 2008, and builds upon that framework to provide an overview of the Trump Administration’s intellectual property enforcement strategy and policy efforts. For the United States’ approach to intellectual property and innovation policy to be successful, it must continue to be a combined effort that includes all branches of government, the private sector, and our international partners. The Trump Administration continues to build on past strategic efforts in all areas of intellectual property policy, including patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets, both domestically and abroad.
  • Andorra Joan Anglada Vilardebo*

    Andorra Joan Anglada Vilardebo*

    Andorra Joan Anglada Vilardebo* , Andorra (Les Valls d'Andorra) is a principality in ment of this sovereignty, the Bishop receives each the nature ofan absolute monarchy. In the Middle year from the General Council of Andorra an Ages, the territory now comprising Andorra was homage known as qiiestia consisting of six hams, the subject-matter ofa feud between two compet­ twelve cheeses, twelve gelded cocks and twelve ing powers. Today, the Bishop of Urgell in the partridges; the French Head receives the qiiestia neighbouring Spanish diocese, and the Head of every second year-in cash. the French government, as successors respectively Andorra has no international relations. Its foreign to the two competing powers of the Middle Ages, interests are looked after by the French govern­ are co-rules over Andorra. In token acknowledge- ment. I. CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM The basis of the constitutional system is derived sana, Andorra and Sant Julia. The last four are from two Decisions delivered on 8 September and further divided into quarts. The divisions repre­ 26 December 1278 in arbitration proceedings be­ sent both administrative and religious units. tween the Bishop of Urgell and the Count of Foix (Valls Taberner III 414-429). 3. State Organs The Heads of State are the twin co-rulers acting 1. Nationality through two Governors (Veguer) one each ap­ Three Decrees dated 17 June 1939, 26 Dec. 1941 pointed by them. Their powers are absolute. and 7 April 1970 make certain provisions as to There is no legislative organ in Andorra. The nationality. Children of an Andorran father country's administration is channelled through acquire the nationality of the country - even when the General Council (Conseel GeneraQ, a body born outside Andorra.
  • Application to Other Countries) Order 2013

    Application to Other Countries) Order 2013

    Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). UK Statutory Instruments are not carried in their revised form on this site. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2013 No. 536 COPYRIGHT RIGHTS IN PERFORMANCES The Copyright and Performances (Application to Other Countries) Order 2013 Made - - - - 13th March 2013 Laid before Parliament 15th March 2013 Coming into force - - 6th April 2013 Her Majesty is satisfied, to the extent this Order relates to a country which is neither a Convention country nor another member State of the European Union, that provision has been or will be made under the law of that country, giving adequate protection to the owners of copyright in respect of works under Part I of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988(1) and to the owners of rights in respect of British performances. Accordingly, Her Majesty, by and with the advice of Her Privy Council, in exercise of the powers conferred upon Her by sections 159 and 208 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988(2) and by section 2(2) of the European Communities Act 1972(3), makes the following Order: Introductory 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the Copyright and Performances (Application to Other Countries) Order 2013 and shall come into force on 6th April 2013. (2) In this Order— “Act” means the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988; “Berne Convention” means the Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works adopted in Berne in 1886 and its revisions(4); “first published” has the meaning ascribed to it by section 155(3) of the Act; “Part I” means Part I of the Act (copyright); (1) 1988 c.48.
  • The Risks of Copyright Infringement on the Internet: a Practitioner's Guide, 33 U.S.F

    The Risks of Copyright Infringement on the Internet: a Practitioner's Guide, 33 U.S.F

    +(,121/,1( Citation: David N. Weiskopf, The Risks of Copyright Infringement on the Internet: A Practitioner's Guide, 33 U.S.F. L. Rev. 1, 58 (1998) Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline Wed Oct 25 18:39:57 2017 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: Copyright Information Use QR Code reader to send PDF to your smartphone or tablet device Articles The Risks of Copyright Infringement on the Internet: A Practitioner's Guide By DAVID N. WEISKOPF* EVERY ATTORNEY SHOULD appreciate the importance of copyright law to their clients. Because copyrighted works can be easily uploaded to the Internet, any party owning copyrights should understand their rights against unauthorized use of those works on the Internet. Additionally, par- ties who maintain operations on the Internet should be informed of the risks of liability for copyright infringement for maintaining a particular type of Internet operation. This article is intended to aid the practitioner in evaluating the effect of current and likely future copyright law on the risks of copyright infringe- ment for Internet Service Providers, Bulletin Board Operators and Web site operators. The article evaluates the current state of copyright law as applied to the Internet and the difficulties that courts have experienced in applying traditional theories of copyright infringement to the Internet.