DOCSLIB.ORG

Note on Developments in Internal Law and Private International Law Concerning Cohabitation Outside Marriage, Including Registered Partnerships

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Note on Developments in Internal Law and Private International Law Concerning Cohabitation Outside Marriage, Including Registered Partnerships AFFAIRES GENERALES ET POLITIQUE GENERAL AFFAIRS AND POLICY Doc. prél. No 11 Prel. Doc. No 11 mars / March 2008 NOTE SUR LES DEVELOPPEMENTS EN DROIT INTERNE ET DROIT INTERNATIONAL PRIVE SUR LA COHABITATION HORS MARIAGE, Y COMPRIS LES PARTENARIATS ENREGISTRES établie par Caroline Harnois (ancienne Collaboratrice juridique) et Juliane Hirsch (Collaboratrice juridique) * * * NOTE ON DEVELOPMENTS IN INTERNAL LAW AND PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW CONCERNING COHABITATION OUTSIDE MARRIAGE, INCLUDING REGISTERED PARTNERSHIPS drawn up by Caroline Harnois (former Legal Officer) and Juliane Hirsch (Legal Officer) Document préliminaire No 11 de mars 2008 à l’intention du Conseil d’avril 2008 sur les affaires générales et la politique de la Conférence Preliminary Document No 11 of March 2008 for the attention of the Council of April 2008 on General Affairs and Policy of the Conference Permanent Bureau | Bureau Permanent 6, Scheveningseweg 2517 KT The Hague | La Haye The Netherlands | Pays-Bas telephone | téléphone +31 (70) 363 3303 fax | télécopieur +31 (70) 360 4867 e-mail | courriel [email protected] website | site internet http://www.hcch.net NOTE SUR LES DEVELOPPEMENTS EN DROIT INTERNE ET DROIT INTERNATIONAL PRIVE SUR LA COHABITATION HORS MARIAGE, Y COMPRIS LES PARTENARIATS ENREGISTRES établie par Caroline Harnois (ancienne Collaboratrice juridique) et Juliane Hirsch (Collaboratrice juridique) * * * NOTE ON DEVELOPMENTS IN INTERNAL LAW AND PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW CONCERNING COHABITATION OUTSIDE MARRIAGE, INCLUDING REGISTERED PARTNERSHIPS drawn up by Caroline Harnois (former Legal Officer) and Juliane Hirsch (Legal Officer) 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. 5 A – BACKGROUND FOR THIS NOTE - UPDATING OF DOCUMENTS ISSUED BY HCCH ..........................5 B – TERMINOLOGY ...................................................................................................6 C – STRUCTURE ......................................................................................................8 PART I – RECENT DEVELOPMENTS WITH RESPECT TO UNMARRIED COHABITATION (DE FACTO UNION) IN INTERNAL LAW ..................................... 9 A – PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS ..................................................................................9 B – DEFINITION OF UNMARRIED COHABITATION / DE FACTO UNION ............................................9 C – FORMATION OF THE UNION ................................................................................... 10 1. Conditions or indicia ............................................................................... 10 a) Duration .......................................................................................... 10 b) Exclusivity........................................................................................ 11 c) Gender ............................................................................................ 11 d) Minimum age.................................................................................... 12 e) Other requirements or indicia.............................................................. 12 2. Impediments......................................................................................... 12 a) Prohibited degrees ............................................................................ 12 b) Undissolved marriage or registered partnership ..................................... 13 c) Other impediments............................................................................ 13 3. Procedure ............................................................................................. 13 D – LEGAL EFFECTS ................................................................................................ 14 1. Property rights....................................................................................... 14 a) Apportionment of property ................................................................. 14 b) Maintenance..................................................................................... 15 c) Compensatory allowance.................................................................... 16 2. Rights with respect to financial matters (taxation, welfare and pensions) ....... 17 3. Family rights with respect to relations between partners.............................. 17 a) Protection of the family home ............................................................. 18 b) Inheritance ...................................................................................... 18 4. Family rights relating to children .............................................................. 19 a) Adoption .......................................................................................... 19 b) Assisted reproduction ........................................................................ 20 E – TERMINATION OF THE COHABITATION ....................................................................... 20 PART II – RECENT DEVELOPMENTS WITH RESPECT TO REGISTERED PARTNERSHIPS IN INTERNAL LAW .................................................................. 21 A – DEFINITION OF A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP ............................................................... 21 B – TYPES OF REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP........................................................................ 21 1. Distinction of registered partnerships by gender requirement ....................... 21 2. Distinction between strong or weak forms of registered partnerships ............. 22 3. Distinction by function given to registered partnerships in a legal system ....... 22 C – FORMATION OF THE PARTNERSHIP ........................................................................... 23 1. Requirements for validity ........................................................................ 23 a) Exclusivity........................................................................................ 23 b) Gender ............................................................................................ 24 c) Age................................................................................................. 24 d) Minimum duration of cohabitation........................................................ 25 e) Consent ........................................................................................... 25 f) Formal requirements ......................................................................... 25 4 2. Impediments......................................................................................... 27 a) Prohibited degrees ............................................................................ 27 b) Undissolved marriage or registered partnership ..................................... 28 D – LEGAL EFFECTS OF THE PARTNERSHIP ....................................................................... 28 1. Property rights....................................................................................... 28 2. Rights with respect to financial matters (taxation, welfare and pensions) ....... 29 3. Family rights with respect to the relationship between partners .................... 29 a) Obligations and duties of partners ....................................................... 30 (i) Cohabitation obligation................................................................. 30 (ii) Obligation of faithfulness.............................................................. 30 (iii) Support and assistance obligation and obligation to contribute to household expenses .......................................................................... 30 (iv) Duty to repay debts.................................................................... 31 (v) Protection of the family home ....................................................... 31 b) Entitlement to maintenance ................................................................ 31 c) Name .............................................................................................. 32 d) Inheritance ...................................................................................... 32 e) Other effects .................................................................................... 32 4. Family rights relating to children .............................................................. 33 a) Adoption .......................................................................................... 33 b) Assisted reproduction ........................................................................ 34 c) Parental responsibility / authority ........................................................ 35 E – DISSOLUTION OF THE PARTNERSHIP ......................................................................... 35 PART III – SUMMARY REVIEW OF RECENT DEVELOPMENTS WITH RESPECT TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE ....................................................................................... 37 PART IV – ISSUES OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW RELATING TO UNMARRIED COHABITATION............................................................................ 39 A – INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 39 B – APPLICABLE LAW............................................................................................... 39 1. Law applicable to formation of the unmarried cohabitation ........................... 40 2. Law applicable to the effects of unmarried cohabitation ............................... 41 PART V – ISSUES OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Law on the Legal Status and Supervision of Credit Institutions and Stockbroking Firms
    06.2017 25 APRIL 2014. - Law on the legal status and supervision of credit institutions and stockbroking firms DISCLAIMER THIS TEXT IS AN UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION AND MAY NOT BE USED AS A BASIS FOR SOLVING ANY DISPUTE (Belgisch Staatsblad/Moniteur belge [Belgian Official Gazette], 7 September 2014) (Unofficial consolidated text) Last update: Law of 25 October 2016 (Belgian Official Gazette, 21 November 2016) and Law of 7 December 2016 (Belgian Official Gazette, 13 December 2016) BOOK I. - SCOPE - DEFINITIONS - GENERAL PROVISIONS TITLE I. - Scope Article 1. § 1. Articles 242, 15° to 19° and 296 to 310, 378 and 379 of the present Law regulate a matter referred to in Article 77 of the Constitution. The other provisions of the present Law, including the Annexes thereto, regulate a matter referred to in Article 78 of the Constitution. § 2. This Law regulates the establishment, activity and the supervision of credit institutions and investment firms which have the capacity of stockbroking firm operating in Belgium, and their potential resolution, to protect savers, investors and the robustness and proper functioning of the financial system. For this purpose, it determines the supervisory task of the National Bank of Belgium in its capacity of national competent authority, namely within the scope of the Single Supervisory Mechanism. Books I to XI and Annexes I to VI of the present Law provide for the partial transposition - which remains limited to the part relating to credit institutions, - of Directive 2013/36/EU; - of Directive 2011/89/EU of
    [Show full text]
  • Part in the Programme May Be Extended for a Maximum of Two Years
    ACADEMIC NETWORK FOR LEGAL STUDIES ON IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM IN EUROPE A NETWORK FOUNDED WITH THE FINANCIAL SUPPORT OF THE ODYSSEUS PROGRAMME OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION RÉSEAU ACADÉMIQUE D’ÉTUDES JURIDIQUES SUR L’IMMIGRATION ET L’ASILE EN EUROPE UN RESEAU FONDE AVEC LE SOUTIEN FINANCIER DU PROGRAMME ODYSSEUS DE LA COMMISSION EUROPEENNE DIRECTIVE 2001/55 TEMPORARY PROTECTION SYNTHESIS REPORT by GREGOR NOLL & MARKUS GUNNEFLO STUDY ON THE “CONFORMITY CHECKING OF THE TRANSPOSITION BY MEMBER STATES OF 10 EC DIRECTIVES IN THE SECTOR OF ASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION” DONE FOR DG JLS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION END 2007(CONTRACT JLS/B4/2006/03) A Network coordinated by the Institute for European Studies Un Réseau coordonné par l'Institut d'Etudes européennes of the / de l’Université Libre de Bruxelles and composed of academics of the following institutions / et composé de membres du corps académique des institutions suivantes: Université catholique de Louvain (B), Universidade Autonoma de Lisboa (P), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (P), Universität Salzburg (A), Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen (NL), University of Bristol (UK), Universitaet Konstanz (D), Universitaet Göttingen (D), Universidad Pontificia Comillas de Madrid (E), Università degli Studi di Milano (I), Université de Paris-Sud (F), Université de Pau et des pays de l’Adour (F), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), Aarhus Universitet (DK), Umeå Universitet(S), Lunds Universitet (S), Åbo Akademi (FIN), University of Turku (FIN), Eötvös Loránd University (HU), University of Silesia (PL), Mykolas Romeris University (LT), University of Ljubljana (SLO), University of Latvia (LV) TABLE OF CONTENTS I. LIST OF NATIONAL RAPPORTEURS 3 II. GENERAL INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY 4 III.
    [Show full text]
  • FIGHTING CORRUPTION Incriminations
    FIGHTING CORRUPTION Incriminations by Mr Roderick MACAULEY Criminal law adviser at the Ministry of Justice of the United Kingdom Thematic Review of GRECO’s Third Evaluation Round For further information, GRECO Secretariat Directorate General I - Human Rights and Rule of Law Council of Europe F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex Tel.: + 33 (0)3 88 41 30 43 Fax: + 33 (0)3 88 41 39 55 www.coe.int/greco www.coe.int PREMS 67012 FIGHTING CORRUPTION Incriminations by Mr Roderick MACAULEY Criminal Law adviser at the Ministry of Justice of the United Kingdom Thematic review of GRECO’s Third Evaluation Round Contents Introduction ........................................................ 5 General themes and observations ...................... 9 Specific Themes ................................................ 20 Public/private distinctions ..................................... 20 Public Official ...................................................... 20 Exercise of functions ............................................ 23 Autonomous offences ........................................... 26 Elemental Deficiencies and Consistency .................. 28 Undue advantage ................................................ 31 Private Sector ..................................................... 35 Trading in influence .............................................. 39 Bribery of foreign and international actors ............... 43 ETS No. 191 (Jurors and Arbitrators) ...................... 45 Extra-territorial jurisdiction ................................... 47 Sanctions ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Humans and Animals in the Norse North Atlantic
    Humans and Animals in the Norse North Atlantic Lara M. Hogg This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. School of History, Archaeology and Religion. Cardiff University. 2015 SUMMARY It is a well-established fact that all human societies have coexisted with and are dependent upon animals and it is increasingly recognized that the study of human-animal relationships provides vital insights into past human societies. Still this is yet to be widely embraced in archaeology. This thesis has examined human-animal interdependencies to explore the social identities and structure of society in the Norse North Atlantic. Benefitting from recent research advances in animal studies and the ever increasing volume of archaeological reports from Norse period archaeological excavations the North Atlantic this thesis was able to develop previous scholarship and define directions for future research. The thesis explored the role of animals in human society in the North Atlantic to reveal the complex Norse societies that existed. It revealed through human interdependencies with animals that these societies were far from homogeneous and had their own distinct identities with the individual islands as well as across the North Atlantic. The thesis achieved this by examining several important discrete but interlinked themes. These themes were divided into four chapters that focused on the individual aspects. This included an examination of previous North Atlantic Viking Age scholarship, consideration of human construction and perception of landscape through archaeological excavations, investigation of the role of domestic animals in human social activities, and an exploration of the role of domesticated animals in beliefs.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Court Judgment No. 237/2005, of September 26 (Unofficial Translation)
    Constitutional Court Judgment No. 237/2005, of September 26 (Unofficial translation) The Second Chamber of the Constitutional Court comprising Mr. Guillermo Jiménez Sánchez, President, Mr. Vicente Conde Martín de Hijas, Ms. Elisa Pérez Vera, Mr. Ramón Rodríguez Arribas and Mr. Pascual Sala Sánchez, Judges, has rendered IN THE NAME OF THE KING the following J U D G M E N T in the appeal for protection proceedings Nos. 1744-2003, 1755-2003 and 1773-2003, the first of which was filed by Ms. Rigoberta Menchú Tumn, Ms. Silvia Solórzano Foppa, Ms. Silvia Julieta Solórzano Foppa, Mr. Santiago Solórzano Ureta, Mr. Julio Alfonso Solórzano Foppa, Mr. Lorenzo Villanueva Villanueva, Ms. Juliana Villanueva Villanueva, Mr. Lorenzo Jesús Villanueva Imizocz, Ms. Ana María Gran Cirera, Ms. Montserrat Gibert Grant, Ms. Ana María Gibert Gran, Ms. Concepción Gran Cirera, Mr. José Narciso Picas Vila, Ms. Aura Elena Farfán, Ms. Rosario Pu Gómez, C. I. Est. Prom. Derechos Humanos, Mr. Arcadio Alonzo Fernández, Conavigua, Famdegua and Ms. Ana Lucrecia Molina Theissen, represented by Court Procurator Ms. Gloria Rincón Mayoral and defended by the attorney Mr. Carlos Vila Calvo, and by the Confederación Sindical de Comisiones Obreras, represented by Court Procurator Ms. Isabel Cañedo Vega and defended by the attorney Mr. Antonio García Martín; No. 1755-2003 by the Asociación de Derechos Humanos de España, represented by Court Procurator Ms. Irene Gutiérrez Carrillo and defended by the attorney Mr. Víctor Hortal Fernández; and No. 1773-2003 by Asociación libre de Abogados, Asociación contra la Tortura, Associació d’Amistat amb el Poble de Guatemala, Asociación Centro de Documentación y Solidaridad con América Latina y África and Comité Solidaridad Internacionalista de Zaragoza represented by Court Procurator Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Browsing Through Bias: the Library of Congress Classification and Subject Headings for African American Studies and LGBTQIA Studies
    Browsing through Bias: The Library of Congress Classification and Subject Headings for African American Studies and LGBTQIA Studies Sara A. Howard and Steven A. Knowlton Abstract The knowledge organization system prepared by the Library of Con- gress (LC) and widely used in academic libraries has some disadvan- tages for researchers in the fields of African American studies and LGBTQIA studies. The interdisciplinary nature of those fields means that browsing in stacks or shelflists organized by LC Classification requires looking in numerous locations. As well, persistent bias in the language used for subject headings, as well as the hierarchy of clas- sification for books in these fields, continues to “other” the peoples and topics that populate these titles. This paper offers tools to help researchers have a holistic view of applicable titles across library shelves and hopes to become part of a larger conversation regarding social responsibility and diversity in the library community.1 Introduction The neat division of knowledge into tidy silos of scholarly disciplines, each with its own section of a knowledge organization system (KOS), has long characterized the efforts of libraries to arrange their collections of books. The KOS most commonly used in American academic libraries is the Li- brary of Congress Classification (LCC). LCC, developed between 1899 and 1903 by James C. M. Hanson and Charles Martel, is based on the work of Charles Ammi Cutter. Cutter devised his “Expansive Classification” to em- body the universe of human knowledge within twenty-seven classes, while Hanson and Martel eventually settled on twenty (Chan 1999, 6–12). Those classes tend to mirror the names of academic departments then prevail- ing in colleges and universities (e.g., Philosophy, History, Medicine, and Agriculture).
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Code
    Criminal Code Warning: this is not an official translation. Under all circumstances the original text in Dutch language of the Criminal Code (Wetboek van Strafrecht) prevails. The State accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the use of this translation. Criminal Code (Text valid on: 01-10-2012) Act of 3 March 1881 We WILLEM III, by the grace of God, King of the Netherlands, Prince of Orange-Nassau, Grand Duke of Luxemburg etc. etc. etc. Greetings to all who shall see or hear these presents! Be it known: Whereas We have considered that it is necessary to enact a new Criminal Code; We therefore, having heard the Council of State, and in consultation with the States General, have approved and decreed as We hereby approve and decree, to establish the following provisions which shall constitute the Criminal Code: Book One. General Provisions Part I. Scope of Application of Criminal Law Section 1 1. No act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under the law at the time of its commission shall be punishable by law. 2. Where the statutory provisions in force at the time when the criminal offence was committed are later amended, the provisions most favourable to the suspect or the defendant shall apply. Section 2 The criminal law of the Netherlands shall apply to any person who commits a criminal offence in the Netherlands. Section 3 The criminal law of the Netherlands shall apply to any person who commits a criminal offence on board a Dutch vessel or aircraft outside the territory of the Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • NETHERLANDS Table of Contents
    2020 PROXY PAPER™ GUIDELINES AN OVERVIEW OF THE GLASS LEWIS APPROACH TO PROXY ADVICE NETHERLANDS Table of Contents GUIDELINES INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................1 Corporate Governance Background ...............................................................................................................................................1 Regulatory Updates ..............................................................................................................................................................................1 Summary of Changes for the 2020 Netherlands Policy Guidelines ..................................................................................2 A SUPERVISORY BOARD THAT SERVES THE INTERESTS OF SHAREHOLDERS ....................3 Election of Board Members...............................................................................................................................................................3 Independence .........................................................................................................................................................................................3 Other Considerations for Individual Board Members .............................................................................................................5 External Commitments ...........................................................................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
    RESTRICTED GENERAL AGREEMENT ON SR.19/12 TARIFFS AND TRADE 21 December 196l Limited Distribution CONTRACTING PARTIES Page 187 Nineteenth Session SUMMARY RECORD OF THE TWELFTH SESSION Held at the Palais des Nations, Geneva, on Saturday, 9 December 1961, at 2.30 p.m. Chairman: Mr. BARBOSA DA SILVA (Brazil) SES. Subjects discussed: 1. Admission of Tanganyika 188 2. Expansion of trade - Tariff Conference 189 3. Accession 192 (a) Israel 193 (b) Portugal 194 (c) Extension of Provisional Accession of Tunisia 198 4. Newly-independent States 199 5. Longer-term solutions to butter marketing problems 200 6. United Kingdom negotiation (bananas) 7. Italian restrictions on imports from Israel 203 8. Residual "hard-core" restrictions - Italy 205 9. Latin American Free Trade Area 205 10. Borneo Free Trade Area 206 11. Expansion of trade - derestriction and publication of documents - measurement of agricultural protection 209 12. Programme of meetings for 1962 211 Financial and administrative questions 212 14. Chairmanship of ICCICA 213 15. Election of officers 214 16. Chairman's closing statement 214 SR.19/12 Page 188 1. Admission of Tanganyika (L/l654) The CHAIRMAN recalled that a communication from the Government of the United Kingdom, advising that on 9 December Tanganyika would acquire full autonomy in the conduct of its external commercial relations, had been distributed in document L/1Ô54; the Government of the United Kingdom sponsored Tanganyika to become a contracting party in accordance with the provisions of Article XXVT:5(c). In the same document a letter from the Government of Tanganyika had been reproduced advising that it wished to be deemed a contracting party pursuant to Article XXVI:5(c) as from 9 December.
    [Show full text]
  • Judgment of the Court, Defrenne/Sabena, Case 43/75 (8 April 1975)
    Judgment of the Court, Defrenne/Sabena, Case 43/75 (8 April 1975) Caption: According to the Court of Justice, in its judgment of 8 April 1976, in Case 43/75, Defrenne/Sabena, articles of the treaty which are mandatory apply not only to the action of public authorities but also extend to independent agreements concluded privately or in the sphere of industrial relations, such as individual contracts and collective labour agreements. Source: Reports of Cases before the Court. 1976. [s.l.]. Copyright: (c) Court of Justice of the European Union URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/judgment_of_the_court_defrenne_sabena_case_43_75_8_april_1975-en-4b9622eb-b750- 4eb2-827f-79f16be9aade.html Publication date: 04/09/2012 1 / 22 04/09/2012 Judgment of the Court 8 April 1976 (1) Gabrielle Defrenne v Société Anonyme Belge de Navigation Aérienne Sabena (preliminary ruling requested by the Cour du travail Brussels) ‘The principle that men and women should receive equal pay for equal work’ Case 43/75 Summary 1. Social policy — Men and women workers — Pay — Equality — Direct discrimination — Individual rights — Protection by national courts (EEC Treaty, Article 119) 2. Social policy — Men and women workers — Pay — Equality — Direct discrimination — Individual rights — Date of taking effect — Time-limit fixed by the Treaty — Resolution of Member States — Directive of Council — Ineffective to vary time-limit — Amendment of Treaty — Method of effecting (EEC Treaty, Articles 119 and 236) 3. Social policy — Men and women workers — Pay — Equality — Direct discrimination — Individual rights — Claims — Retroactivity — Legal certainty (EEC Treaty, Article 119) 4. Social policy — Men and women workers — Pay — Equality — Indirect discrimination — Elimination — Community powers and national powers (EEC Treaty, Article 119) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Civil Law Studies
    Journal of Civil Law Studies Volume 7 | Number 1 Article 11 10-29-2014 Complete V.7 No.1 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/jcls Part of the Civil Law Commons Repository Citation Complete V.7 No.1, 7 J. Civ. L. Stud. (2014) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/jcls/vol7/iss1/11 This Complete Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Civil Law Studies by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Volume 7 Number 1 2014 ___________________________________________________________________________ ARTICLES . Law and the Lodestar: Tunisian Civil Law and the Task of Ordering Plurality in the Aftermath of the Jasmine Revolution .................................................. Dan E. Stigall . Mixed Jurisdiction and the Scottish Legal Tradition: Reconsidering the Concept of Mixture ................................................................. Stephen Thomson . Civil Status and Civil Registry: Current Trends in Spanish Law ...................Sofía de Salas Murillo . Enlarged State Power to Declare Nullity: The Hidden State Interest in the Chinese Contract Law .................................................... Hao Jiang CIVIL LAW TRANSLATIONS . Louisiana Civil Code - Code civil de Louisiane Book III, Titles 7 and 8 ..........................................................................Center of Civil Law Studies CIVIL
    [Show full text]
  • Guide for Mobile European Workers
    GUIDE FOR MOBILE EUROPEAN WORKERS GUIDE FOR MOBILE EUROPEAN WORKERS Dr. Katrin Distler, DGB Ger Essers, FNV European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) 2011 With the financial support of the European Commission About the authors: Ger Essers was born and grew up on the Dutch-German Border (Kerkrade, 1946). He now lives on the Dutch-Belgian border (Maastricht). After a career in education, he has worked for the Dutch trade Union FNV as an adviser on cross-border working since 1993. He was a EURES adviser in the Euregio Rhine- Meuse-Waal, and advised Dutch, Belgian and German cross-border workers. He is co-author of all three editions of the “Guide for Mobile European Workers.” Katrin Distler (born in 1963) grew up on the German-Swiss border. After studying and earning a doctor- ate in Economics, various activities at the University of Freiburg (Germany) and as head of a model project in the State of Baden-Württemberg (Germany) on the promotion of women in industry, she has been active in the German Trade Union Federation (DGB) since 2000. As of 2004, she has been the DGB EURES adviser at the Franco-German-Swiss EURES border partnership and cooperated in the third edition of the “Guide for European Mobile Workers.” Thanks to Bart Vanpoucke of the socialist trade union federation in Belgium (ABVV/FGTB), who was active there until 2009 as EURES adviser for Belgian, French and British cross-border workers and who cooperated in the first two editions of the Guide for European Mobile Workers.” Thanks are also in order to Waldemar Lisowski, representative for foreign contacts and EURES adviser in the Jeleniogórski Region of the Polish trade union „Solidarność”, who contributed several additions to the third edition.
    [Show full text]