London and South East Route Utilisation Strategy Draft For

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

London and South East Route Utilisation Strategy Draft For December 2010 London and South East Route Utilisation Strategy Draft for Consultation London and South East Route Utilisation Strategy Draft for Consultation December 2010 Consultation for Draft Utilisation Strategy Route Network Rail Kings Place 90 York Way London N1 9AG Tel: 020 3356 9595 www.networkrail.co.uk RUS142/December 2010 London and South East Route Utilisation Strategy Draft for Consultation December 2010 Term Meaning SDO Selective Door Opening – used where the whole train does not fit into a station platform to unlock only the doors at the platform. SMG Stakeholder Management Group. SOFA Statement Of Funds Available – the Government's allocation of funding for rail schemes. Network Rail bids for this funding through its Strategic Business Plan which is then reviewed and allocated by the ORR for Network Rail's next Control Period. Strategic routes Network Rail is structured for planning purposes with 17 Routes, which are aligned closely to the traffic flows in the planning areas and operation areas to enable direct use of route plans for delivery. SWML South West Main Line – the line between London Waterloo and Weymouth. TfL Transport for London. TfSH Transport for South Hampshire. Thameslink Programme Upgrade of Brighton to Bedford route to allow 12-car trains to operate, including station Key Output 1 works at London Blackfriars and Farringdon. Thameslink Programme Remodelling of London Bridge station and the eastern and western approaches, including Key Output 2 grade separation at Bermondsey and connections to the new viaduct at Borough Market. A new connection will be provided from London St Pancras International low level onto the ECML. TOC Train operating company. tph Trains per hour. TT Timetable – these are usually published in May and December. TWA Transport and Works Act orders – the usual way of authorising a new railway or tramway scheme in England and Wales. Up The direction of trains normally when travelling towards London or large urban centre where direct trains to London do not operate. WCML West Coast Main Line – the routes from London Euston to the West Midlands, North West, North Wales and Scotland. WCML DC lines Third rail electrified routes between London Euston and Watford Junction. Windsor lines Routes between London Waterloo and Reading via Twickenham and to Windsor & Eton Riverside. WLL West London Line – the line between Clapham Junction and Willesden Junction/West Coast Main Line. 25kV AC 25,000 volts alternating current is the electrical supply for the overhead electrified routes. 750V DC 750 volts direct current is the electrical supply for the third rail system. Contents 3 Foreword 4 Executive summary 19 1. Background 21 2. Scope and planning context 26 3. Current operations and train performance 36 4. Morning peak to London – current demand 46 5. Morning peak to London – committed schemes and other existing strategy 61 6. Morning peak to London – future demand 70 7. Capacity gaps and options beyond existing strategy 103 8. Network connectivity 112 9. Freight in South East England 130 10. Solent and South Hampshire 162 11. Emerging conclusions 164 12. Consultation process and next steps 165 Appendix A: Stations 172 Appendix B: Solent and South Hampshire bus services 181 Glossary 183 Foreword This London and South East Route Utilisation Strategy (RUS) builds on the series of previous RUSs, published between 2005 and 2010, covering routes into and around the capital. Given the length of time which has passed since some of these earlier publications, and the current circumstances which now apply, updates are needed in several areas and this ‘Generation Two’ RUS therefore provides these. As a result it represents our latest analysis with respect to an appropriate strategy to 2031 for the South East England railway network as a whole. The RUS contains a detailed study of the South Hampshire and Solent area, which was only partially The RUS focuses on how to increase covered by the 2005 South West Main Line RUS. This rail capacity to accommodate for section has been developed closely with the local authorities and train operators using this part of the extra demand. network. There is now a 12-week consultation period on this Strategy and we welcome your comments and The RUS forecasts an increase of over 30 per cent in feedback, particularly on the interventions suggested. the numbers of commuters using National Rail services Stakeholder views will be incorporated wherever into the capital during the weekday morning peaks. possible prior to the final RUS which will be published This is linked to economic forecasts for central London in summer 2011. employment, which is expected to grow throughout the lifetime of this strategy. The RUS therefore focuses Whilst the views expressed in this document are those on how to increase rail capacity to accommodate this of Network Rail the RUS has been developed closely extra demand. This is a central theme in the document, with the Department for Transport, Transport for as is the growing role of rail freight, removing lorries London and our customers, the passenger and freight from increasingly congested roads. train operating companies, whom I thank for their involvement to date. As in all RUSs, the methodology for providing solutions to the future requirements asked of the rail network Paul Plummer requires the development of a range of options which Director, Planning and Development are subsequently tested to determine the best value for money intervention, which in turn is tested for affordability. On a small number of routes within the area covered by the London and South East RUS there remains a significant challenge to meet these criteria, and the RUS will need to assess this further as part of a wider planning context. In the shorter term the RUS is consistent with the findings of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review and subsequent announcements, including new train fleets of approximately 1200 carriages for Thameslink and 600 carriages for Crossrail. This RUS considers the effects of current ongoing projects such as these, but also looks beyond them to identify train service changes, infrastructure upgrades and potential new routes for the future. 3 Executive summary Introduction Since June 2005, the Network Licence has required Network Rail to publish Route Utilisation Strategies, which establish the most effective and efficient ways to use the capacity available across the network. The Network Licence requires that Network Rail maintain established RUSs – those that have been established by the Office of Rail Regulation. This has led to development of a second generation of RUSs, of which this London and the South East RUS is the third. Scope and planning context l it forecasts the growth in peak passenger demand up to 2031 in detail for all routes into This London and South East Route Utilisation the capital, an extension to some Generation Strategy (RUS) builds upon the Generation One One RUSs which only looked up to 2019. It RUSs previously produced by Network Rail between identifies the gaps between existing strategy and 2005-2010 which cover most of the area within future demand on all key corridors, and where its remit. This Generation Two RUS extends the gaps exist considers how best to bridge them strategy as follows: l the first of Network Rail’s RUSs, the South West l it looks at all corridors into London at the same Main Line, was developed as a prototype and was time and in a consistent way, so results are now produced within comparatively short timescales in directly comparable between routes order to inform the South Western re-franchising l it considers current economic conditions, process in 2006. As a result, it did not address which have changed since the time of certain parts of the network fully (eg the South earlier RUSs, impacting on demand forecasts Hampshire and Solent area), so the opportunity and affordability has been taken in this RUS to remedy this l it recognises that many infrastructure projects l several projects affecting freight are now from previous RUSs – for example platform committed, principally involving capacity lengthening, resignalling schemes and the enhancement schemes and loading gauge remodelling of capacity constraints (such as at clearance for international standard 9’6” Reading) – are now committed. It now considers containers on conventional wagons. Also these projects in more detail to identify how more is now known about freight trends and they could best facilitate the desired additional anticipated terminal developments peak capacity into the capital l the RUS recognises that the current Government l following recent Government announcements has a different policy from its predecessor with both Crossrail and the Thameslink Programme respect to the treatment of airport development are now also fully committed schemes, providing in South East England in particular, with the RUS additional north-south and east-west capacity considering options consistent with this policy and connectivity. The RUS considers whether l Government policy now includes the proposed future development of the Crossrail network in development of a High Speed Rail network from particular could assist with growth. In the longer London to the West Midlands and beyond. The term it also notes that further new cross-London RUS therefore now considers that High Speed 2 rail tunnels (such as the Chelsea-Hackney will be completed within the RUS timescales. line/Crossrail 2) might be a step up for the development of London’s rail network 4 London and South East Route Utilisation Strategy Draft for Consultation December 2010 RUS baseline – committed schemes Other existing strategy The baseline for the RUS includes committed In considering its strategy the RUS draws heavily infrastructure schemes (as defined in Network Rail’s on the interventions considered by Generation Control Period 4 (CP4) Delivery Plan, together with One RUSs, with recommendations remaining subsequent announcements by Government) and uncommitted at present in most cases carried committed service changes (as defined in franchise forward into this RUS.
Recommended publications
  • South West Main Line Strategic Study 3 MB
    OFFICIAL South West Main Line Strategic Study Phase 1 2021 1 OFFICIAL Network Rail Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................ 3 2.0 Long-Term Planning Process ........................................................................................................................... 6 3.0 The South West Main Line Today................................................................................................................. 8 4.0 Strategic Context ..............................................................................................................................................13 5.0 South West Main Line - Demand ................................................................................................................25 6.0 Capacity Analysis ..............................................................................................................................................34 7.0 Intervention Feasibility ...................................................................................................................................59 8.0 Emerging Strategic Advice ............................................................................................................................62 Appendix A – Safety Baseline .....................................................................................................................................74 Appendix B – Development
    [Show full text]
  • GRAHAM FARISH PRODUCTS by ITEM NUMBER COLOUR(S) & ITEM № RUNNING №(S)
    GRAHAM FARISH PRODUCTS BY ITEM NUMBER COLOUR(S) & ITEM № RUNNING №(s). FULL DESCRIPTION LIVERIES Junior Starter Set consisting of Item A) General Purpose 0-6-0T Tank locomotive, Running Number 268 in Southern Green Livery, Item B) 12 Ton Planked Vent Van, Running Number 5 in 370-025 268, 5, 5014 Green, Brown & Red 'Worthington' Brown Livery, Item C) 7 Plank Wagon End Door Wagon, Running Number 5014 in 'CARLTON MAIN COLLIERY CO. LTD' Red Livery, Item D) 20 Ton LMS Brake Van, in SR Brown Livery, Item E) 8 Pieces 379-452 track, Item F) Bachmann A/C Mains Transformer & Controller Junior Starter Set consisting of Item A) General Purpose 0-6-0T Tank locomotive, Running Number 7309 in LMS Crimson Livery, Item B) 12 Ton Planked Vent Van, Running Number 5 in 370-025A 7309, 5, 5014 Crimson, Brown, Grey & Red 'Worthington' Brown Livery, Item C) 7 Plank Wagon End Door Wagon, Running Number 5014 in 'CARLTON MAIN COLLIERY CO. LTD' Red Livery, Item D) 20 Ton LMS Brake Van in SR Grey Livery, Item E) 8 Pieces 379-452 track, Item F) Bachmann A/C Mains Transformer & Controller Junior Starter Set consisting of Item A) J94 Class 0-6-0 Saddle Tank Locomotive, Running Number 68040 in BR Black Livery with Late Crest, Item B) 12 Ton Planked Vent Van, Running Number 68040, 505969, 346 & 370-050 Black, Brown, Grey & Orange 505969 in LMS Grey Livery, Item C) 7 Plank Wagon End Door Wagon, Running Number 346 in 'J. R. WOOD CO. LTD' Orange Livery, Item D) 20 Ton LMS Brake Van, Running Number NE151752 NE151752 in BR Brown Livery, Item E) 8 Pieces 379-452 track, Item
    [Show full text]
  • London Connections OFF-PEAK RAIL SERVICES
    Hertford East St Margarets Interchange Station Aylesbury, Banbury Aylesbury Milton Keynes, Luton Bedford, Stevenage, Letchworth, Welwyn Stevenage Harlow, Bishops Stortford, and Birmingham Northampton, Cambridge, Kings Lynn, Hertford Stansted Airport Limited services (in line colours) Wellingborough, Garden City Ware Rugby, Coventry, Kettering, Leicester, Huntingdon, Peterborough North and Cambridge and The North East Rye Limited service station (in colours) Birmingham and Nottingham, Derby Hatfield Bayford The North West House Escalator link and Sheffield Broxbourne Welham Green Cuffley Airport link Chesham Watford Bricket St Albans ST ALBANS HIGH WYCOMBE Amersham North Wood Abbey Brookmans Park Crews Hill Enfield Town Cheshunt Docklands Light Railway Watford WATFORD Cockfosters Theobalds Tramlink Garston How Park Potters Bar Gordon Hill Wagn Epping Beaconsfield JUNCTION Wood Street Radlett Grove Bus link Hadley Wood Oakwood Enfield Chase Railway Chalfont & Latimer Watford Bush Theydon Bois Croxley Hill UNDERGROUND LINES Seer Green Croxley High Street Silverlink County New Barnet Waltham Cross Green Watford Elstree & Borehamwood Southgate Grange Park Park Debden West Turkey Bakerloo Line Chorleywood Enfield Lock Gerrards Cross Oakleigh Park Arnos Grove Winchmore Hill Street Loughton Central Line Bus Link Stanmore Edgware High Barnet Bushey Southbury Brimsdown Buckhurst Hill Circle Line Denham Golf Club Rickmansworth Mill Hill Broadway Bounds Chiltern Moor Park Carpenders Park Totteridge & Whetstone Chingford Canons Park Burnt New Green
    [Show full text]
  • South Western Franchise Agreement
    _____ September 2006 THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRANSPORT and STAGECOACH SOUTH WESTERN TRAINS LIMITED SOUTH WESTERN FRANCHISE AGREEMENT incorporating by reference the National Rail Franchise Terms (Second Edition) CONTENTS CLAUSE PAGE 1. INTERPRETATION AND DEFINITIONS ............................................................................. 4 2. COMMENCEMENT .......................................................................................................... 5 3. TERM 5 4. GENERAL OBLIGATIONS ................................................................................................ 6 5. SPECIFIC OBLIGATIONS ................................................................................................. 6 6. COMMITTED OBLIGATIONS ......................................................................................... 48 7. SUPPLEMENTAL TERMS ............................................................................................... 48 8. RECALIBRATION OF THE BENCHMARKS ...................................................................... 49 9. DOCUMENTS IN THE AGREED TERMS .......................................................................... 49 10. ENTIRE AGREEMENT ................................................................................................... 49 APPENDIX 1 ........................................................................................................................... 52 Secretary of State Risk Assumptions (Clause 5.1(y)) ................................................. 52 APPENDIX
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed Rail
    House of Commons Transport Committee High Speed Rail Tenth Report of Session 2010–12 Volume III Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published 24 May, 7, 14, 21 and 28 June, 12 July, 6, 7 and 13 September and 11 October 2011 Published on 8 November 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited The Transport Committee The Transport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Transport and its Associate Public Bodies. Current membership Mrs Louise Ellman (Labour/Co-operative, Liverpool Riverside) (Chair) Steve Baker (Conservative, Wycombe) Jim Dobbin (Labour/Co-operative, Heywood and Middleton) Mr Tom Harris (Labour, Glasgow South) Julie Hilling (Labour, Bolton West) Kwasi Kwarteng (Conservative, Spelthorne) Mr John Leech (Liberal Democrat, Manchester Withington) Paul Maynard (Conservative, Blackpool North and Cleveleys) Iain Stewart (Conservative, Milton Keynes South) Graham Stringer (Labour, Blackley and Broughton) Julian Sturdy (Conservative, York Outer) The following were also members of the committee during the Parliament. Angie Bray (Conservative, Ealing Central and Acton) Lilian Greenwood (Labour, Nottingham South) Kelvin Hopkins (Labour, Luton North) Gavin Shuker (Labour/Co-operative, Luton South) Angela Smith (Labour, Penistone and Stocksbridge) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Woking - Heathrow Airport (Central Bus Station) Railair RA2 Via Heathrow Terminal 5
    Guildford Rail Station – Woking - Heathrow Airport (Central Bus Station) railair RA2 via Heathrow Terminal 5 Daily Service Guildford Rail Station 0330 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 The Chase, University of Surrey 0337 0507 0607 0707 0807 0906 1006 1106 1206 1306 1406 1506 1607 1707 1807 1907 2007 2107 Woking Station, southside 0355 0525 0625 0730 0830 0926 1026 1126 1226 1326 1426 1526 1630 1730 1830 1930 2025 2125 Paragon Roundabout, McLaren 0403 0533 0633 0740 0838 0934 1034 1134 1234 1334 1434 1534 1640 1740 1840 1940 2033 2133 Heathrow, Terminal 5 0421 0551 0658 0805 0858 0954 1054 1154 1254 1354 1454 1554 1705 1805 1905 1958 2051 2151 Compass Centre 0427 0557 0705 0812 0905 1001 1101 1201 1301 1401 1501 1601 1712 1812 1912 2004 2057 2157 Heathrow Central Bus Stn 0433 0603 0712 0819 0911 1007 1107 1207 1307 1407 1507 1608 1719 1819 1919 2010 2103 2203 Heathrow Central Bus Stn 0440 0620 0720 0840 0940 1040 1140 1240 1340 1440 1530 1625 1725 1830 1930 2040 2140 2240 Compass Centre 0446 0626 0726 0846 0946 1046 1146 1246 1346 1446 1536 1631 1731 1836 1936 2046 2146 2246 Heathrow, Terminal 5 0453 0633 0734 0853 0953 1053 1153 1253 1353 1453 1543 1639 1739 1844 1943 2053 2153 2253 Paragon Roundabout, McLaren 0511 0659 0800 0911 1011 1111 1211 1311 1411 1511 1601 1705 1805 1910 2001 2111 2211 2311 Woking Station, southside 0518 0709 0810 0921 1021 1121 1221 1321 1421 1521 1611 1715 1815 1920 2008 2118 2218 2318 The Chase, University of Surrey 0534 0731 0832 0938 1038 1138 1238 1338 1438
    [Show full text]
  • Glyne Gap – Operational Assessment (Pdf)
    Proposed new passenger station at Glyne Gap, Bexhill Technical note – Stage 3b: Operational assessment March 2013 Rother District Council, East Sussex County Council, Land Securities Group PLC Confidential Proposed311776 ITD newITN passenger1 A Document5 station at Glyne Gap,5 October Bexhill 2012 Technical note – Stage 3b: Operational assessment March 2013 Rother District Council, East Sussex County Council, Land Securities Group PLC Confidential Rother District Council, Town Hall, Bexhill-on-Sea TN39 3JX Mott MacDonald, Spring Bank House, 33 Stamford Street, Altrincham, Cheshire WA14 1ES, United Kingdom T +44(0) 161 926 4000 F +44(0) 161 926 4100, W www.mottmac.com Proposed new passenger station at Glyne Gap, Bexhill Confidential Issue and revision record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description A 26 Nov 2012 MCS KP RJF Draft technical note summarising operational issues surrounding Glyne Gap station B 28 March 2013 MCS/KP KP/RJF RJF Final version with client comments addressed This document is issued for the party which commissioned it We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned document being relied upon by any other party, or being used project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which used for any other purpose. is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it.
    [Show full text]
  • Serial Asset Type Active Designation Or Undertaking?
    Serial Asset Type Active Description of Record or Artefact Registered Disposal to / Date of Designation, Designation or Number Current Designation Class Designation Undertaking? Responsible Meeting or Undertaking Organisation 1 Record YES Brunel Drawings: structural drawings 1995/01 Network Rail 22/09/1995 Designation produced for Great Western Rly Co or its Infrastructure Ltd associated Companies between 1833 and 1859 [operational property] 2 Disposed NO The Gooch Centrepiece 1995/02 National Railway 22/09/1995 Disposal Museum 3 Replaced NO Classes of Record: Memorandum and Articles 1995/03 N/A 24/11/1995 Designation of Association; Annual Reports; Minutes and working papers of main board; principal subsidiaries and any sub-committees whether standing or ad hoc; Organisation charts; Staff newsletters/papers and magazines; Files relating to preparation of principal legislation where company was in lead in introducing legislation 4 Disposed NO Railtrack Group PLC Archive 1995/03 National Railway 24/11/1995 Disposal Museum 5 YES Class 08 Locomotive no. 08616 (formerly D 1996/01 London & 22/03/1996 Designation 3783) (last locomotive to be rebuilt at Birmingham Swindon Works) Railway Ltd 6 Record YES Brunel Drawings: structural drawings 1996/02 BRB (Residuary) 22/03/1996 Designation produced for Great Western Rly Co or its Ltd associated Companies between 1833 and 1859 [Non-operational property] 7 Record YES Brunel Drawings: structural drawings 1996/02 Network Rail 22/03/1996 Designation produced for Great Western Rly Co or its Infrastructure
    [Show full text]
  • Camilla Ween Lessons from London
    Camilla Ween Lessons from London Harvard Loeb Fellow February 2008 1 Developing a World City 2 Better integration of the River Thames 3 Planning for growth 4 Balancing new and old 5 2000 London changed! Greater London Authority Mayor Ken Livingstone 6 Greater London Authority: • Mayor’s Office • Transport for London • London Development Agency • Fire and Emergency Planning • Metropolitan Police 7 What helped change London • Greater London Authority established in 2000 • Spatial Development Strategy - London Plan • Transport for London • Congestion Charge Scheme • Major transport schemes • Role of Land Use Planning • Sustainable travel and ‘soft’ measures 8 Spatial Development Strategy 9 London Plan A coherent set of policies • Climate Change Action Plan • Waste • Noise • Biodiversity • Children’s play space • Flood • Access etc etc 10 11 Transport for London • Overground rail • Underground • Buses • Trams • Taxis • River Services • Cycling • Walking 12 Transport for London • Budget ca $15 Bn • Carries 3 billion passengers pa 13 Transport for London Steady increase in journeys (2007): • Bus up 3.6% • Underground up 4.5% • Docklands Light Rail 16% 14 Transport Strategy 15 Congestion Charge Scheme • First zone introduced 2003 • Area doubled 2007 16 16 Congestion Charging 17 17 Congestion Charge Scheme • Number-plate recognition • Central call-centre billing • Many options for paying: - Buy on the day - Text messaging - Internet 18 Congestion Charging • $16 per day (multiple re-entry) • 7.00 am to 6.00 pm • Monday to Friday • Weekends free 19 Congestion Charging Benefits: • 21 % Traffic reduction • 30% Congestion reduction in first year • 43 % increase in cycling within zone • Reduction in Accidents • Reduction in key traffic pollutants • $250m raised for improving transport 20 Congestion Charging • Public transport accommodating displaced car users • Retail footfall higher than rest of UK • No effect on property prices 21 Major Transport Schemes Being developed: • Crossrail • New tram systems • Major interchanges - e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Submissions to the Call for Evidence from Organisations
    Submissions to the call for evidence from organisations Ref Organisation RD - 1 Abbey Flyer Users Group (ABFLY) RD - 2 ASLEF RD - 3 C2c RD - 4 Chiltern Railways RD - 5 Clapham Transport Users Group RD - 6 London Borough of Ealing RD - 7 East Surrey Transport Committee RD – 8a East Sussex RD – 8b East Sussex Appendix RD - 9 London Borough of Enfield RD - 10 England’s Economic Heartland RD – 11a Enterprise M3 LEP RD – 11b Enterprise M3 LEP RD - 12 First Great Western RD – 13a Govia Thameslink Railway RD – 13b Govia Thameslink Railway (second submission) RD - 14 Hertfordshire County Council RD - 15 Institute for Public Policy Research RD - 16 Kent County Council RD - 17 London Councils RD - 18 London Travelwatch RD – 19a Mayor and TfL RD – 19b Mayor and TfL RD - 20 Mill Hill Neighbourhood Forum RD - 21 Network Rail RD – 22a Passenger Transport Executive Group (PTEG) RD – 22b Passenger Transport Executive Group (PTEG) – Annex RD - 23 London Borough of Redbridge RD - 24 Reigate, Redhill and District Rail Users Association RD - 25 RMT RD - 26 Sevenoaks Rail Travellers Association RD - 27 South London Partnership RD - 28 Southeastern RD - 29 Surrey County Council RD - 30 The Railway Consultancy RD - 31 Tonbridge Line Commuters RD - 32 Transport Focus RD - 33 West Midlands ITA RD – 34a West Sussex County Council RD – 34b West Sussex County Council Appendix RD - 1 Dear Mr Berry In responding to your consultation exercise at https://www.london.gov.uk/mayor-assembly/london- assembly/investigations/how-would-you-run-your-own-railway, I must firstly apologise for slightly missing the 1st July deadline, but nonetheless I hope that these views can still be taken into consideration by the Transport Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • ED142 : NHDC Final Response to Inspector's Actions Arising out of The
    ED142 : NHDC Final response to Inspector’s Actions arising out of the Hearing Sessions Matter 6 – Deliverability Action Date on which Examination Doc Action Completed Reference No. • NHDC to provide updated version of Table A of Matter Enclosed as ED142 Appendix M6-1 6 Hearing Statement (to include infrastructure for other allocated sites (i.e. not housing sites)) and the Housing Trajectory • NHDC to provide updated Infrastructure Delivery Plan 23/01/ 2018 ED73 • Infrastructure Delivery Plan Appendix A 23/02/2018 ED73a Enclosed As Appendix M6-2 • Hertfordshire County Council to provide suggested 21/02/2018 ED105 Enclosed as additional/amended wording in the Plan regarding Appendix M6-3 transport issues for consideration by NHDC MM028, MM031, MM032 and MM033. • NHDC to liaise with Stevenage Borough Council with Enclosed as ED142 Appendix M6-4 regard to additional/amended wording • NHDC to provide note clarifying transport position 08/02/2018 ED86 Enclosed as with regard to B656 between Codicote and Appendix M6-5 Knebworth as raised by Mr Bamber of Save Rural Codicote • NHDC to provide note clarifying whether or not 08/02/2018 ED85 Enclosed as transport modelling shows that there is a need for a Appendix M6-6 southern bypass for Hitchin during the Plan period Appendix M6 – 1 ED142 : Note on Matter 6 / Table A – Infrastructure provision NORTH HERTFORDSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL LOCAL PLAN EXAMINATION ED142: MATTER 6 Note to Inspector Matter 6 / Table A – Infrastructure provision 1. Following the hearing sessions for Matter 6 (Deliverability), the following action has been specified: • NHDC to provide updated version of Table A of Matter 6 Hearing Statement (to included infrastructure for other allocated sites (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Tfl Interchange Signs Standard
    Transport for London Interchange signs standard Issue 5 MAYOR OF LONDON Transport for London 1 Interchange signs standard Contents 1 Introduction 3 Directional signs and wayfinding principles 1.1 Types of interchange sign 3.1 Directional signing at Interchanges 1.2 Core network symbols 3.2 Directional signing to networks 1.3 Totem signs 3.3 Incorporating service information 1.3 Horizontal format 3.4 Wayfinding sequence 1.4 Network identification within interchanges 3.5 Accessible routes 1.5 Pictograms 3.6 Line diagrams – Priciples 3.7 Line diagrams – Line representation 3.8 Line diagrams – Symbology 3.9 Platform finders Specific networks : 2 3.10 Platform confirmation signs National Rail 2.1 3.11 Platform station names London Underground 2.2 3.12 Way out signs Docklands Light Railway 2.3 3.13 Multiple exits London Overground 2.4 3.14 Linking with Legible London London Buses 2.5 3.15 Exit guides 2.6 London Tramlink 3.16 Exit guides – Decision points 2.7 London Coach Stations 3.17 Exit guides on other networks 2.8 London River Services 3.18 Signing to bus services 2.9 Taxis 3.19 Signing to bus services – Route changes 2.10 Cycles 3.20 Viewing distances 3.21 Maintaining clear sightlines 4 References and contacts Interchange signing standard Issue 5 1 Introduction Contents Good signing and information ensure our customers can understand Londons extensive public transport system and can make journeys without undue difficulty and frustruation. At interchanges there may be several networks, operators and line identities which if displayed together without consideration may cause confusion for customers.
    [Show full text]