Plato Journal
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
L A N R U O J Y J UN 2019 O T T ISSN 2079-7567 A eISSN 2183-4105 E L I P I9 C Established 1989 O http://platosociety.org/ S Papers Colin C. Smith, O Dialectical Methods and the T Stoicheia Paradigm in Plato’s Trilogy and Philebus A Dougal Blyth, Plato’s Socrates, Sophistic L Antithesis and Scepticism P Carrie Swanson, Socratic Dialectic between Philosophy and Politics in L Euthydemus 305e5-306d1 A Book Reviews Laura Candiotto, N Luc Brisson, 2017. Platon. L’écrivain qui inventa la O philosophie I Jana Schultz, Plato and the Power of Images. T By Pierre Destrée and Radcliffe G. Edmonds III A Noburu Notomi,Satoshi Ogihara, N Why we write in Japanese: A brief introduction to recent Plato R studies in Japan E T N I PLATO Société Platonicienne JOURNAInternatioLnale Associazione Internazionale dei Platonisti Sociedad Internacional de Platonistas Internationale Platon-Gesellschaft Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra Coimbra Universiy Press JUN 2019 I9 ISSN 2079-7567 eISSN 2183-4105 Established 1989 http://platosociety.org/ Papers Colin C. Smith, Dialectical Methods and the Stoicheia Paradigm in Plato’s Trilogy and Philebus Dougal Blyth, Plato’s Socrates, Sophistic Antithesis and Scepticism Carrie Swanson, Socratic Dialectic between Philosophy and Politics in Euthydemus 305e5-306d1 Book Reviews Laura Candiotto, Luc Brisson, 2017. Platon. L’écrivain qui inventa la philosophie Jana Schultz Plato and the Power of Images. By Pierre Destrée and Radcliffe G. Edmonds III Noburu Notomi,Satoshi Ogihara, Why we write in Japanese: A brief introduction to recent PL ATO Plato studies in Japan INTERNATIONAL PLATO SOCIETY PLATO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL Société Platonicienne Internationale Associazione Internazionale dei Platonisti Sociedad Internacional de Platonistas Internationale Platon-Gesellschaft Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra Coimbra Universiy Press 2 | Enicaper ficaed susta nondin is es nonim et dolore CREDITS SCIENTIFIC BOARD INTERNATIONAL PLATO Francisco Bravo SOCIETY EXECUTIVE EDITION Universidad Central de Venezuela Imprensa da Universidade de [email protected] COMMITTEE (2017-20) Coimbra Luc Brisson Co-President: Luc Brisson Coimbra University Press CNRS – UPR76 Centre Jean-Pépin, Paris CNRS – UPR76 Centre Jean-Pépin, Paris [email protected] http://uc.pt/imprensa_uc [email protected] Tomás Calvo Co-President: Arnaud Macé PROPERTY Universidad Complutense, Madrid Université de Franche-Comté, Besançon [email protected] International Plato Society [email protected] John Dillon Co- President: Olivier Renaut Université Paris Ouest – Nanterre-La Défense DESIGN Trinity College, Dublin [email protected] Carlos Costa [email protected] Thomas M. Robinson Vice President: Verity Harte Yale University INFOGRAPHICS University of Toronto [email protected] [email protected] Bookpaper Livio Rossetti Ex-President: Francisco Bravo Università di Perugia Universidad Central de Venezuela ISSN [email protected] [email protected] 2079-7567 Christopher Rowe Ex-President: Gabriele Cornelli Durham University Universidade de Brasília eISSN [email protected] [email protected] 2183-4105 Samuel Scolnicov † Next President: Edward Halper The Hebrew University of Jerusalem University of Georgia DOI Shinro Kato [email protected] https://doi.org/ Tokyo Metropolitan University 10.14195/2183-4105 Representative for Europe: Noburu Notomi Keio University, Tokyo Francesco Fronterotta © 2019 Imprensa da notomil.u-tokyo.ac.jp La Sapienza – Università di Roma Universidade [email protected] de Coimbra International Plato REVISERS Representative for Europe: Society Jonatas Rafael Alvares Barbara Satttler Universidade de Brasília University of St-Andrews [email protected] [email protected] Joseph Carter EDITOR Representative for North America: University of Georgia Gabriele Cornelli [email protected] Debra Nails Michigan State University Cecilia Li Universidade de Brasília [email protected] Western University Canada [email protected] [email protected] Representative for Latin America: Milena Lozano Nembrot Raul Gutierrez Universidad de Buenos Aires Universidad Católica del Peru EDITORIAL BOARD [email protected] [email protected] Renato Matoso Brandão Pauline Sabrier Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Sun Yat-Sen University Representative for Asia, Australia, Brazil [email protected] [email protected] and Africa: Yuji Kurihara Laura Candiotto Tokyo Gagukei University Freie Universität Berlin INTERNATIONAL PLATO [email protected] [email protected] SOCIETY EDITORIAL María Angélica Fierro Representative for the C. J. de Vogel Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina COMMITTEE [email protected] Franco Ferrari | Salerno – Coordinator Foundation: [email protected] Annie Larivée Carlos Steel Carleton University, Canada Filip Karfìk | Fribourg Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Georgia Mouroutsou Dimitri El Murr | Paris Western University, Canada [email protected] [email protected] Beatriz Bossi | Madrid Luca Pitteloud [email protected] Universidade Federal do ABC, São Paulo, Brazil Richard Parry | Atlanta [email protected] [email protected] Voula Tsouna University of California, Santa Barbara, USA [email protected] LOREM IPSUM | 3 SUMMARY 5 EDITORIAL PAPERS 9 Dialectical Methods and the Stoicheia Paradigm in Plato’s Trilogy and Philebus Colin C. Smith 25 Plato’s Socrates, Sophistic Antithesis and Scepticism Dougal Blyth 43 Socratic Dialectic between Philosophy and Politics in Euthydemus 305e5-306d1 Carrie Swanson BOOK REVIEWS 93 Luc Brisson, 2017. Platon. L’écrivain qui inventa la philosophie. Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf., Pp. 298. Laura Candiotto 95 Plato and the Power of Images. By Pierre Destrée and Radcliffe G. Edmonds III (ed.). Leiden: Brill 2017. Pp. 243. Jana Schultz 101 Why we write in Japanese: A brief introduction to recent Plato studies in Japan Noburu Notomi, Satoshi Ogihara GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORS 4 | Enicaper ficaed susta nondin is es nonim et dolore EDITORIAL | 5 argument for the preeminence of their art. EDITORIAL As a way of enhancing the debate within our Society and beyond, this volume decided to offer four excellent Books Reviews of works related to Plato and platonic scholarship. Candiotto offers an insightful review of Brisson most recent book, Platon:L’écrivain qui inventa la philosophie. dedicated to the study of Plato’s Gabriele Cornelli life as an introduction to his very philosophy. [email protected] Schultz’s reviews of Destrée & Edmond III edited book on Plato and the Power of Images highligths the volume to anyone interested in the tension within Plato’s dialogues between describing the power of images as something harmful and wretched and using the power of images in various occasion within philosophical discussions. Notomi offers us a small piece on on why japanese is still the main language of Japanese scholarship. I strongly believe these same observations are similarly valid for others regions and languages and I sincerely hope that A new volume of PLATO has seen the light, after these few lines can start a debate on this very the generous dedication by the two Assistant important issue. On this note, Notomi’s piece is Editors, prof. Renato Matoso and prof. Luca followed by an ensligh review of the very first Pitteloud, as well the precious help received by monograph ever written in Japanese on Plato’s the members of the Board. I would very much Laws: The Rule of Law and the Philosophy of like to thank referees and revisers, as well as Dialogue: A Study in Plato’s Dialogue Laws, by the International Plato Society, which holds the Maruhashi. And while we are all heading to Journal as one of its most important windows Paris, let’s take the opportunity to once again to the world. PLATO 19 arrives in the very express our deepest gratitude to the Coimbra week of the most awaited Paris XII Symposium University Press for the precious publishing Platonicum on Plato’s Parmenides. The volume management of our journal. starts with Smith’s paper on the dialectical methods in Theaetetus, Sophist, and Philebus, Cambridge, July 2019 arguing for a unity of these methods as relevant to Platonic education. Blyth’s paper is willing to draw attention to later academic interpretation of Plato’s depiction of Socrates as a sceptic. In the third and last paper of the volume, Swanson focuses in a fairly long and elaborated essay on the final scene of the Euthydemus, arguing that its curious speech is a reverse eikos argument, directed at the speechwriters own eikos PAPERS 8 | Enicaper ficaed susta nondin is es nonim et dolore COLIN C. SMITH | 9 Dialectical Methods and the Stoicheia Paradigm in Plato’s Trilogy and Philebus Colin C. Smith The University of Kentucky [email protected] ABSTRACT Plato’s Theaetetus, Sophist, and Statesman exhibit several related dialectical methods relevant to Platonic education: maieutic in Theaetetus, bifurcatory division in Sophist and Statesman, and non-bifurcatory division in Statesman, related to the ‘god-given’ method in Philebus. I consider the nature of each method through the letter or element (στοιχεῖον) paradigm, used to reflect on each method. At issue are the element’s appearances in given contexts, its fitness for communing with other elements like it in kind, and its own nature defined through its relations to others. These represent stages of inquiry for the Platonic student inquiring into the sources of knowledge.