Chapter Xi1 Australia Doubles the A.I.F

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter Xi1 Australia Doubles the A.I.F CHAPTER XI1 AUSTRALIA DOUBLES THE A.I.F. THEAustralians and New Zealanders who returned from Gallipoli to Egypt were a different force from the adven- turous body that had left Egypt eight months before. They were a military force with strongly established, definite traditions. Not for anything, if he could avoid it, would an Australian now change his loose, faded tu& or battered hat for the smartest cloth or headgear of any other army. Men clung to their Australian uniforms till they were tattered to the limit of decency. Each of the regimental numbers which eight months before had been merely numbers, now carried a poignant meaning for every man serving with the A.I.F., and to some extent even for the nation far away in Australia. The ist, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Infantry Battalions-they had rushed Lone Pine; the 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th had made that swift advance at Helles; the gth, ioth, I ith, 12th had stormed the Anzac heights; the igth, iqth, igth, 16th had first held Quinn’s, Courtney’s and Pope’s; the battalion numbers of the 2nd Division were becoming equally famous-and so with the light horse, artillery, engineers, field ambulances, transport companies, and casualty clearing stations. Service on the Gallipoli beaches had given a fighting record even to British, Egyptian and Maltese labour units that normally would have served far behind the front. The troops from Gallipoli were urgently desired by Kitchener for the defence of Egypt against the Turkish expedition that threatened to descend on it as soon as the Allies’ evacuation had released the Turkish army ANZAC TO AMIENS [Dec. igiij-Jan. 1916 also. It was estimated that the Turks might concentrate 250,000 men for this purpose; and the plans announced by the Germans might, Lord Kitchener feared, “set the East in a blaze”. His own proposal for countering this threatened invasion by striking at Alexandretta had been rejected by the British government, and he therefore reluctantly fell back on the plan of the British War Office for defending Egypt by holding the line of the Suez Canal. Thither, then, the troops from Gallipoli and others were directed, making a force of some twelve infantry and two cavalry divisions for the defence of Egypt but also as a reserve “for the whole Empire” against other coming needs. General Sir Arcliibald Murray, hitherto Chief of the General Staff at the War Office, was sent to command it. Instead of “making the Canal defend him” --a policy much criticised-he was to defend it by pushing his garrison about eight miles east of it. The line they were to fortify there was already being surveyed and was guarded by a few isolated posts. The forces from Gallipoli urgently needed their ranks to be filled, and also re- equipment and reorganisation in accordance with the new composition of British infantry divisions. For these purposes the two Australian divisions, I st and 2nd, were sent to a huge camp on the hl E OITERRANEAN SEA site of -4rabi Pasha’s old battlefield at Tel Alexand el Kebir, on the desert thirty miles west of Ismailia and the Suez Canal; the New Zea- land and Australian Division was sent to Moascar Camp near by, outside Ismailia. The line east of the Canal was still being surveyed, and the front along the 184 I 9 15-19161 THE A.I.F. DOUBLED Canal was held by one English and one Indian division, the newly arrived 8th Australian Infantry Brigade, and some Indian troops. The nearest large body of Turks comprised 13,000 men at their railhead in southern Palestine at Beersheba, 120 miles away, on the other side ot the Sinai Desert. Turkish forward troops were 70-1 oo miles away, making and guarding preparations for an advance through the desert against Egypt.’ The 8th Brigade was far from being the only Xus- tralian force found in Egypt by the troops returning from Gallipoli. In addition to the A.I.F. headquarters staff in Cairo, and the transport troops there and at Alexandria (the base of the hlediterranean Expeditionary Force), there were in the Australian training and con- valescent depots very great nuinbers of sick and wounded and of reinforcements. Most of those who during recent months would normally have been shipped to Gallipoli had been stopped in Egypt by the decision to abandon the Peninsula. After the Evacuation over 10,ooo joined their units in Lemnos. But the depots near Cairo still held at least zo,ooo, and more were arriving. The chief reason for these numbers was the flood of recruiting in Australia. The plunge of the A.I.F. into Gallipoli, and the sudden, first, terrible casualty lists, had caused more Australians to offer. The sinking of the crowded liner Lusttanta by a submarine without warning increased the bitterness against Germans; but the chiet urge came from the realisation that, contrary to the opti- mistic communiques, the war was going badly-with the repulse of all efforts to break the stalemate in France, and with the drive of the Germans into Russia. It is true that the entry of Italy on the side of the Allies showed that she expected them to win. But eager citizens demanded a properly organised recruiting cainpaign; and, in the energetic recruiting that followed, the enlist- 1During the Gallipoli Campaign Turhish spies and scouo had occa- sionally reached the Canal A mme placed in it had sunk a British areamer. 185 ANZAC TO AMIENS [~girj-Jan.1916 inents rose from Gn50 in April, 10,526 in May, and 12,505 in June, to 36,575 in July, 25,714 in August and 16,571 in September. The numbers in training camps in Aus- tralia swelled from 16,424 in June to 73,963 in October. It happened that in October Australia experienced a change of Prime Ministers: Andrew Fisher, on whom the responsibilities of that position had borne heavily, was appointed to succeed Sir George Reid as High Com- missioner for Australia in London, and William Morris Hughes, who already was the chief force in the Ministry, became Prime Minister in his place. At this juncture a War Census, which largely by the action of Mr Hughes had just been completed, showed that 244,000 single men of military age were still available for enlistment- according to the classification of the statisticians, not, of course, of the medical authorities. Australia was then maintaining overseas a force of some 60,000 men. The government thereupon decided that, in addition to the monthly quota of 9500 reinforcements, it would send, if desired by the British government, 50,000 fresh troops, organised as nine infantry brigades with attendant troops -in effect, three infantry divisions without artillery. This decision, announced on November 26th, would raise Aus- tralia’s oversea force to about 1 io,ooo men. The War Office subsequently indicated that it would prefer three divisions ,complete, but the Defence Department could not promise artillerymen, guns, or rifles. A.I.F. headquarters at the front had been informed of this offer. At that time the A.I.F. was being adminis- tered by General Godley, commander of the New Zealand Expeditionary Force, who, during Birdwood’s appoint- ment to the Dardanelles Army, was commander of the Anzac Corps. On arrival in Egypt Godley-who was still holding these commands, with Brudenell White as chief of his staff-was faced by the problem of what to do with the 40,000 unallotted Australian and New Zealand reinforcements already there. He was most desirous of 186 Jan. 19161 THE A.I.F. DOUBLED organising the New Zealand troops in Egypt into a divi- sion, the existing New Zealand Infantry Brigade being expanded with reinforcements to lorm two brigades, and the Rifle Brigade (then arriving from New Zealand) pro- viding the third. The Australian reinforcements could similarly be used to expand the A.I.F. from two divisions into four divisions. These, and the New Zealand Division, officered and trained by experienced solcliers from Gallipoli, could then form two army corps. Later the 50,000 troops arriving from Australia would allow still another division to be formed besides providing reinforcements. Godley suggested that, for the period of the reorganisation, General Birdwood, with General White as chief-of-staff, should administer the whole Aus- tralian and New Zealand forces. It was mid-January 1916, when Godley made this proposal to Sir Archibald Murray. Murray gave his approval against the advice of some of his staff, who had a very low estimate of the capacity oE the Australian depot in Egypt for training officers and N.C.O.’s. Murray especially desired that the 30,000 Australian reinforce- ments, then unallotted at Cairo, and swarming in the streets and hotels, should be brought quickly into con- trol and training in fighting units. Birdwood reaching Egypt on January 1 gth, enthusiastically developed the scheme, being particularly hopeEd that, with two Anzac corps, the War Office might sanction the formation of an Australian and New Zealand Army. He suggested that the third new Australian division should be formed in Australia. The War Office, though not yet prepared to sanction the grouping of the Anzacs into an “Army”, passed on the rest of the proposal to the Australian and New Zealand governments, which presently agreed. Australia promised to send artillerymen with the third division- but it could not send guns or train their crews. This would ultimately give five Australian infantry divisions. 187 ANZAC TO AMIENS [Nov. 1915-Jan.1916 In addition there would be the New Zealand infantry division, and an Anzac mounted division, formed from the Light Horse and New Zealand Mounted Rifles Brigades, which had now returned from Anzac to their beloved horses.
Recommended publications
  • Download the Full Report
    H U M A N ON THEIR WATCH R I G H T S Evidence of Senior Army Officers’ Responsibility WATCH for False Positive Killings in Colombia On Their Watch Evidence of Senior Army Officers’ Responsibility for False Positive Killings in Colombia Copyright © 2015 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-32507 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org JUNE 2015 978-1-6231-32507 On Their Watch Evidence of Senior Army Officers’ Responsibility for False Positive Killings in Colombia Map .................................................................................................................................... i Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Your Presentation Is the Keynote Presentation for the Block
    1984 RUSI VIC BLAMEY ORATION By Major General Ken G. Cooke, ED There must be something special about a man who on the centenary of his birth and thirty-three years after his death can still trigger a gathering of so many people, including so many busy and distinguished people, in a Melbourne park on a Tuesday morning in January. So let us take a few minutes to review briefly the life of Thomas Alfred Blamey to try and determine just how this can be. He was born on 24th January, 1884 on the outskirts of Wagga Wagga, the seventh of the ten children of Richard and Margaret Blamey. His father had tried his luck at farming, both in Queensland and New South Wales, but as was often the case the ventures ended in disaster due to the old traditional enemies of drought, bush fire and fluctuating cattle prices. He then settled in Wagga where he earned his living as a contract drover. His was a pioneer family so typical of the time and it exemplified the strength of our immigrant stock both before and since. Young Tom was educated in Wagga, first at the Government school and then for the last two years at the Grammar school to which he won a place on his pure ability. His upbringing generally was as you would expect. He had to help around the family property before and after school and on vacations he worked as a tar- boy in the local shearing sheds. As he grew older he went on several droving trips to help his father.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Feed the Troops on Victory': a Study of the Australian
    ‘FEED THE TROOPS ON VICTORY’: A STUDY OF THE AUSTRALIAN CORPS AND ITS OPERATIONS DURING AUGUST AND SEPTEMBER 1918. RICHARD MONTAGU STOBO Thesis prepared in requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Humanities and Social Sciences University of New South Wales, Canberra June 2020 Thesis/Dissertation Sheet Surname/Family Name : Stobo Given Name/s : Richard Montagu Abbreviation for degree as given in the : PhD University calendar Faculty : History School : Humanities and Social Sciences ‘Feed the Troops on Victory’: A Study of the Australian Corps Thesis Title : and its Operations During August and September 1918. Abstract 350 words maximum: (PLEASE TYPE) This thesis examines reasons for the success of the Australian Corps in August and September 1918, its final two months in the line on the Western Front. For more than a century, the Corps’ achievements during that time have been used to reinforce a cherished belief in national military exceptionalism by highlighting the exploits and extraordinary fighting ability of the Australian infantrymen, and the modern progressive tactical approach of their native-born commander, Lieutenant-General Sir John Monash. This study re-evaluates the Corps’ performance by examining it at a more comprehensive and granular operational level than has hitherto been the case. What emerges is a complex picture of impressive battlefield success despite significant internal difficulties that stemmed from the particularly strenuous nature of the advance and a desperate shortage of manpower. These played out in chronic levels of exhaustion, absenteeism and ill-discipline within the ranks, and threatened to undermine the Corps’ combat capability. In order to reconcile this paradox, the thesis locates the Corps’ performance within the wider context of the British army and its operational organisation in 1918.
    [Show full text]
  • Tom Gellibrand Was Born at Nuwara Iliya in Ceylon Now Sri Lanka On
    OBITUARY THOMAS IANSON GELLIBRAND Tom Gellibrand was born at Nuwara Iliya in Ceylon now tion at the Hobart Congress in 1964 that the collecting Sri Lanka on November 29, 1908. His father was a cap- of birds or their eggs within the area specified for a Con- tain in the British Army and he retired in 1912 and gress shall not be permitted was seconded by Noel Jack brought the family to Tasmania where two of his brothers of Queensland and carried. Tom died in Tasmania on were running the family property Cleveland at Ouse. He November 15, 1981. bought an apple orchard and just one year later the First World War started and he joined the A.I.F. Tom then The name Gellibrand is well-known in Victoria. Tom's aged five had a daily tutor and later went to Hutchen's great-grandfather Joseph Tice Gellibrand was appointed School in Hobart and finally to Geelong Grammar. His the first Attorney General for Tasmania in 1824 and he great interest was farming particularly in sheep and he was behind the move to send John Batman to start a set- was a jackaroo on Western Victorian properties and he tlement in Victoria. It was on a visit to Melbourne in 1837 also took a course on wool-classing at the Geelong that he with Mr Hesse whilst visiting settlers of the Port Gordon Institute. Whilst he was farming at Murrindindi Phillip Association became lost in the Otways and search in north-east Victoria he joined and was commissioned parties failed to find them or their horses.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Zealand Army Officer Corps, 1909-1945
    1 A New Zealand Style of Military Leadership? Battalion and Regimental Combat Officers of the New Zealand Expeditionary Forces of the First and Second World Wars A thesis provided in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History at the University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand Wayne Stack 2014 2 Abstract This thesis examines the origins, selection process, training, promotion and general performance, at battalion and regimental level, of combat officers of the New Zealand Expeditionary Forces of the First and Second World Wars. These were easily the greatest armed conflicts in the country’s history. Through a prosopographical analysis of data obtained from personnel records and established databases, along with evidence from diaries, letters, biographies and interviews, comparisons are made not only between the experiences of those New Zealand officers who served in the Great War and those who served in the Second World War, but also with the officers of other British Empire forces. During both wars New Zealand soldiers were generally led by competent and capable combat officers at all levels of command, from leading a platoon or troop through to command of a whole battalion or regiment. What makes this so remarkable was that the majority of these officers were citizen-soldiers who had mostly volunteered or had been conscripted to serve overseas. With only limited training before embarking for war, most of them became efficient and effective combat leaders through experiencing battle. Not all reached the required standard and those who did not were replaced to ensure a high level of performance was maintained within the combat units.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPPLEMENT to the LONDON GAZETTE, P APKIL, 1919. 4527
    SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, p APKIL, 1919. 4527 3863 Private Hubert Clifton Ladner, 12tli 6309 Serjeant Bertie Daniel Herbert - ' Field Ambulance, Australian Army Medical O'Connor, 2nd Battalion, Australian In- Corps. • ' fantry. 222 (Serjeant Robert Laidlaw, 24th Battalion, 29473 Serjeant Leonard O'Grady, llth Bat- Australian Infantry. tery, 4th Brigade, Australian Field Artil- 38 Private (Lajace-Coirponal) Arthur William lery. Landells, 38th Battalion, Australian 663 Serjeant Harold Oldfield, 27th Battalion, Infantry. Australian Infantry. 2791 Driver (Lance-Corporal) William Law- 8987 Driver Reuben Oliver, 114th Howitzer rence, 5th Field Ambulance, Australian Battery, 14th Australian Field Artillery '•' Army Medical Corps. Brigade. 8432 Driver Warwick James Lean, 4th 5515 Private George Joseph O'Neill, 4th Field Mechanical Transport Company, Australian Ambulance, Australian Army Medical Army Service Corps. Corps. 2702 Lance-Corporal Leslie Isaac Linwood, 4th 616 Lance-Corporal (temporary 2nd Corporal) Pioneer Battalion, Australian Infantry. Alexander Paterson, 5th Divisional Signal 2407 Serjeant Alfred Samuel Lowe, 13th Bat- Company, Australian Engineers. talion, Australian Infantry. 1442 Private (Lance-Corporal) David Paul, 2713 Corporal diaries Lukins, 5th Pioneer Australian Infantry, attached 12th Trench . Battalion, Australian Infantry. Mortar Battery, 45th Battalion. 2407 Temporary Corporal John Lynch, 9th 5015 Lance-Corporal Frederick Perini, 14th , Battalion, Australian Infantry. Field Company, Australian Engineers. 345 Private Albert Konald McDonald, 2nd 1852 Serjeant Albert Henry Petersen, 41st Australian Light Trench Mortar Battery. Battalion, Australian Infantry. 2406 Private Alexander McDonald, 57th Bat- 1580 Serjeant Richard Leopold Pomeroy, 1st talion, 'Australian Infantry. Battalion, Australian Machine Gun Corps. 7439 Lance-Corporal Charles Walter Macfar- 2634 Private Edward Porte, 9th Battalion, lane, M.M., 12th Battalion, Australian In- Australian Infantry.
    [Show full text]
  • Machine Gun Units
    Guide to Sources Relating to Units of the Canadian Expeditionary Force Machine Gun Units Machine Gun Units Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 1 Canadian Machine Gun Corps ................................................................................................................... 2 Machine Gun Squadron, Canadian Cavalry Brigade ................................................................................. 4 1st Canadian Machine Gun Company ........................................................................................................ 1 2nd Canadian Machine Gun Company ....................................................................................................... 2 3rd Canadian Machine Gun Company ....................................................................................................... 4 4th Canadian Machine Gun Company ....................................................................................................... 6 5th Canadian Machine Gun Company ....................................................................................................... 8 6th Canadian Machine Gun Company ....................................................................................................... 9 7th Canadian Machine Gun Company ..................................................................................................... 10 8th Canadian Machine Gun Company ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brigadier L R GREVILLE DSO
    Brigadier L R GREVILLE DSO Brigadier Greville was President of the Club in 1986 - 87 Leon (“Lee”) Rodric Greville was born 10 August 1927 at Queenscliff, Victoria. He was the son of Colonel Sydney Jamieson Greville OBE [1899 – 1982] 1 and Doreta (“Reta”) Mary (née Spring) [1900 – 1994] (married 1925). His elder brother was Brigadier Phillip Jamieson Greville CBE [1925 – 2011] 2 and their younger sister Patricia was married to Major General Ron Grey AO, DSO. Lee was educated at Canberra High School (1938-39), Box Hill High (1940-41) and Essendon High (1942-43). At 16, he entered the Royal Military College, Duntroon and graduated in 1946 into the Royal Australian Infantry Corps. 1 Colonel Sydney Greville – Professional Soldier; 6th Division Signals, WW2; CO British Commonwealth Forces Base Signals Regiment, Korea, 2 Brigadier Phillip Greville – graduated RMC 1944; 2/8 Fd Coy, New Guinea, WW2; graduated civil engineering University of Sydney; Aslt Pnr Pl Comd 1 RAR Korea; captured and PoW; Comd 1 ALSG Vietnam; Acting Comd 1 ATF Vietnam; Comd 4MD. We thank the History Interest Group and other volunteers who have researched and prepared these Notes The series will be progressively expanded and developed. They are intended as casual reading for the benefit of Members, who are encouraged to advise of any inaccuracies in the material. Please do not reproduce them or distribute them outside of the Club membership. File: HIG/Biographies/GREVILLE Page 1 Lee married Helen Margaret (“Peggy”) Lawrence [1926 – 2012] - a science graduate from Melbourne
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Journeys to Cameron's Farm
    Ten Journeys to Cameron’s Farm An Australian Tragedy Ten Journeys to Cameron’s Farm An Australian Tragedy Cameron Hazlehurst Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Hazlehurst, Cameron, 1941- author. Title: Ten Journeys to Cameron’s Farm / Cameron Hazlehurst. ISBN: 9781925021004 (paperback) 9781925021011 (ebook) Subjects: Menzies, Robert, Sir, 1894-1978. Aircraft accidents--Australian Capital Territory--Canberra. World War, 1939-1945--Australia--History. Australia--Politics and government--1901-1945. Australia--Biography. Australia--History--1901-1945. Dewey Number: 320.994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU Press Printed by Griffin Press © Flaxton Mill House Pty Ltd 2013 and 2015 Cover design and layout © 2013 ANU E Press Cover design and layout © 2015 ANU Press Contents Part 1 Prologue 13 August 1940 . ix 1 . Augury . 1 2 . Leadership, politics, and war . 3 Part 2 The Journeys 3 . A crew assembles: Charlie Crosdale and Jack Palmer . 29 4 . Second seat: Dick Wiesener . 53 5 . His father’s son: Bob Hitchcock . 71 6 . ‘A very sound pilot’?: Bob Hitchcock (II) . 99 7 . Passenger complement . 131 8 . The General: Brudenell White (I) . 139 9 . Call and recall: Brudenell White (II) . 161 10 . The Brigadier: Geoff Street . 187 11 .
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER XIX the Capture of Hiio11t St. Quentin and Psronne Is Held By
    CHAPTER XIX THE HINDENBURG OUTPOST-LINE THEcapture of hiIo11t St. Quentin and PSronne is held by many Australian soldiers to be the most brilliant achievement of the A.1.F.l Among the operations planned by Monash it stands out as one of movement rather than a set piece; indeed within Australian experience of the Western Front it was the only important fight in which quick, free manoeuvre played a decisive part. It furnishes a complete answer to the comment that Monash was merely a composer of set pieces. But Monash himself realised that it was also largely a soldiers’ battle. Monash passed four brigades under the enemy’s nose round the bend of the Somme, with all his invariable care in plan- ning, supplying and bridging. But what an instrument was to his hand! The picture given in the histories of some German regiments of their slender, exhausted remnants being over- . whelmed by masses of fresh troops is sheer propaganda. The 2nd and 3rd Divisions at least, with companies depleted to the German level, weary with-in soiiie cases-incredibly pro- tracted effort, and without normal artillery support, constantly attacked more than their number of Germans in strong, well wired positions and captured more prisoners than they could safely hold. The tactics were necessarily left largely to divisional, brigade, battalion and even platoon commanaers , they were sometimes brilliant and sometimes faulty, but in general the dash, intelligence, and persistence of the troops dealt a stunning blow to five German divisions, drove the enemy from one of his key positions in France, and took 1 Gen.
    [Show full text]
  • The 8Th Australian Infantry Brigade Group in World War II
    Jump TO Article The article on the pages below is reprinted by permission from United Service (the journal of the Royal United Services Institute of New South Wales), which seeks to inform the defence and security debate in Australia and to bring an Australian perspective to that debate internationally. The Royal United Services Institute of New South Wales (RUSI NSW) has been promoting informed debate on defence and security issues since 1888. To receive quarterly copies of United Service and to obtain other significant benefits of RUSI NSW membership, please see our online Membership page: www.rusinsw.org.au/Membership Jump TO Article CONTRIBUTED HISTORY ESSAY The 8th Australian Infantry Brigade Group in World War II an address to Headquarters 8th Brigade on 22 March 2014 by Brigadier D. R. Leece, PSM, RFD, ED (Retʼd) Royal United Services Institute, New South Wales1 The 8th Brigade, a Militia formation, participated in the defence of Australia in 1942-43, first in Sydney and then in Western Australia. In 1944-45, as a brigade group of the 5th Australian Division, it participated in liberating Australian New Guinea from the Japanese, clearing the northern coast of New Guinea from Sio west to the Sepik River and then assisting the 6th Australian Division to capture Wewak. Key words: World War II; Australia; New Guinea; 8th Brigade; Sio; Saidor; Madang; Alexishafen; Hansa Bay; Sepik River; Wewak. 2014 is the 70th anniversary of the deployment of the Its commander from May 1940 was Brigadier Claude 8th Australian Infantry Brigade Group to New Guinea in Cameron,2 a citizen soldier who was a veteran of the 1944 where it participated in the liberation of Australian Great War during which he had twice been awarded the New Guinea from the Japanese.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Military History
    Canadian Military History Volume 24 Issue 1 Article 31 2015 The Barrier and the Damage Done Converting the Canadian Mounted Rifles ot Infantry, December 1915 William Stewart Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation William Stewart "The Barrier and the Damage Done Converting the Canadian Mounted Rifles to Infantry, December 1915." Canadian Military History 24, 1 (2015) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. : The Barrier and the Damage Done Converting the Canadian Mounted Rifles to Infantry, December 1915 The Barrier and the Damage Done Converting the Canadian Mounted Rifles to Infantry, December 1915 WILLIAM F. STEWART Abstract: The Canadian Mounted Rifles were a rising phenomenon in the prewar period based on military exigency, the need for a form of light cavalry and mobile firepower, the financial realities governing the Canadian military, the success of mounted rifles in the Second Boer War, and a supposed affinity of Canadians for this form of warfare. When tested on the Western Front in a minor operation, however, the mounted rifles floundered, which confirmed the decision to convert them into infantry because of their unsuitable organisation, leadership flaws, the demand for more infantry, and tensions between senior commanders. “Regarding the 1st and 2nd Mounted Brigades, I stated that I considered their discipline and training not what it should be.
    [Show full text]