Improvements to San Tin Interchange PURPOSE This Paper Informs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Improvements to San Tin Interchange PURPOSE This Paper Informs LC Paper No. CB(1)274/04-05(01) For Information Legislative Council Panel on Transport 777TH – Improvements to San Tin Interchange PURPOSE This paper informs Members of our proposal to upgrade 777TH – Improvements to San Tin Interchange to Category A in order to carry out the proposed improvement works. PROJECT SCOPE 2. The scope of 777TH comprises – (a) construction of a single two-lane road of 1.5 kilometres in length for the westbound traffic from Fanling Highway (FH) to the vehicle holding area (VHA) at Lok Ma Chau including 800 metres of elevated highway structures; (b) construction of a single two-lane road of 850 metres in length for the eastbound traffic from San Tin Highway (STH) to the VHA at Lok Ma Chau including 450 metres of elevated highway structures; (c) construction of a single two-lane road of 50 metres in length connecting Kwu Tung Road (KTR) to the road mentioned in paragraph 2(a) above; (d) construction of a single two-lane road of about 250 metres in length between Castle Peak Road (CPR) and San Sham Road (SSR); (e) modification of the junction of STH / CPR / Tun Yu Road (TYR) including signalisation of the junction of CPR and the slip roads from STH, and widening of a 300-metre section of CPR from a single two-lane to a dual two-lane road; (f) construction of a single-lane road bridge of 70 metres in length across the San Tin Eastern Main Drainage Channel (STEMDC) connecting an existing unnamed road along the eastern side of STEMDC near the VHA to TYR; (g) installation of noise barriers of 120 metres in length and 1.5 metres in height at STH near Wing Ping Tsuen; (h) provision of a traffic control and surveillance system (TCSS); and (i) associated works on junction improvements, landscaping, slopeworks, drainage, traffic management measures and street lighting. A site plan showing the locations of the proposed works and the road sections concerned is at Enclosure 1. JUSTIFICATION 3. The Lok Ma Chau (LMC) Boundary Crossing is the most heavily used boundary crossing1, with about 70% of the cross boundary traffic being goods vehicles. Most of the cross-boundary vehicles use the strategic STH in the west and FH in the east which meet at the San Tin roundabout (the roundabout), and then travel through SSR, the only connecting road, to the LMC Boundary Crossing. 4. At present, the cross-boundary vehicles have to queue at the VHA that has 350 vehicle holding spaces for cross-border inspection. As a result of the limited capacity as well as the heavy utilisation of the Interchange and the roads in the vicinity, the cross-boundary traffic queue often tails back from the VHA to the roundabout, and consequentially spills over to STH and FH. In view of the increasing cross-boundary traffic, which is expected to grow at an average rate of 7% per annum in the coming years, we expect that the Interchange would suffer from capacity deficiency if no improvement were 1 The number of vehicles using the boundary crossings from January to September 2004 was 38 321, of which 28 675, 7 428 and 2 218 used the Lok Ma Chau, Man Kam To and Sha Tau Kok Boundary Crossings respectively. - 2 - made to cope with the anticipated traffic growth. The Interchange would become a bottleneck along the cross-boundary corridor. 5. To meet the cross-boundary traffic demand and to relieve traffic congestion, we will construct a pair of elevated roads from STH and FH approaches of the Interchange as bypasses to the VHA. We will designate the roads for use by cross-boundary goods vehicles only so as to segregate these vehicles from the other vehicles using the Interchange. Upon completion of the improvement works, the projected design flow to capacity2 (DFC) ratios of the roundabout during peak hours would be brought down from 0.89 to 0.5 and from 1.02 to 0.56 in 20073 and 2011 respectively. 6. We will also modify the layout of the junction of STH/CPR/TYR by realigning the existing slip roads between STH and CPR, signalising the junction of CPR and the realigned slip roads in order to improve the traffic flow capacity at this modified road junction, and widening a section of CPR from a single two-lane to a dual two-lane road. The capacity indices of this junction during peak hours in 2004, 2007 and 2011, with and without the proposed signalisation and widening of CPR, are/would be as follows – Junction of CPR and Capacity Year slip roads from STH Index 2004 2007 2011 Without the signalisation DFC 1.40 2.40 2.40 and road widening With the signalisation and RC4 – 28% 28% road widening 7. We will construct two roads connecting KTR to FH westbound and CPR to SSR northbound. The former will divert the existing cross-boundary 2 DFC ratio is a design parameter that measures the degree of saturation of traffic at a priority junction. A DFC ratio above 1.0 indicates the presence of traffic queues. A DFC ratio of 0.85 is generally used in junction design where the situation permits. 3 The DFC ratios have taken into account the cross-boundary traffic from the Hong Kong-Shenzhen Western Corridor / Deep Bay Link to be commissioned in 2006. 4 The performance of a traffic signal junction is indicated by its reserve capacity (RC). A positive RC indicates that the junction is operating with spare capacity. A negative RC indicates that the junction is overloaded, resulting in traffic queues and longer delay time. - 3 - goods vehicles from KTR to use the new road mentioned in paragraph 2(a) above. The latter will divert the existing cross-boundary goods vehicles from CPR to SSR direct. We will also construct a road bridge across STEMDC to link TYR to the existing unnamed road to reprovide local access to and from CPR. 8. For monitoring and controlling traffic flows, we will install a TCSS comprising one closed circuit television camera with associated communication and installation equipment, and a traffic signal system at the LMC Boundary Crossing, and two full variable message signs at STH and SSR. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS 9. We estimate the cost of this project to be $488.3 million in MOD prices, made up as follows – $ million (a) Road and drainage 131.6 (b) Elevated highway structures 161.8 (c) Road bridge 12.4 (d) Slope works 47.9 (e) TCSS and traffic management 14.0 measures (f) Landscaping works 15.3 (g) Noise barrier 1.5 (h) Consultants’ fees 69.6 (i) construction 5.0 supervision and contract administration - 4 - $ million (ii) resident site staff 60.1 costs (iii) environmental 4.0 monitoring and audit (EM&A) programme5 (iv) Electrical and 0.5 Mechanical Services Trading Fund (EMSTF) charges6 (i) Contingencies 39.4 Sub-total 493.5 (in September 2004 prices) (j) Provision for price adjustment (5.2) Total 488.3 (in MOD prices) 10. Item (a) includes the road reconstruction, waterworks, pedestrian subway extension and road signage. Item (b) includes the detailed design and construction of the elevated highway structures. A breakdown of the estimates for item (g) on consultants’ fees is at Enclosure 2. 5 We will engage consultants to implement an EM&A programme at an estimated cost of $4.0 million to ensure timely and effective implementation of the recommended mitigation measures for the project. 6 Since the establishment on 1 August 1996 under the Trading Fund Ordinance, the EMSTF charges government departments for design and technical consultancy services for electrical and mechanical (E&M) installations provided by the Electrical and Mechanical Services Department. The services rendered for this project include checking consultants’ submission on all E&M installations and providing technical advice to the Government on all E&M works and their impacts on the project from maintenance and general operation points of view. - 5 - 11. The annual recurrent expenditure for the existing roads under the project is about $300,000. We estimate that the annual recurrent expenditure for those roads upon completion of the project will be $4.0 million. PUBLIC CONSULTATION 12. We consulted the San Tin Rural Committee and the Traffic and Transport Committee of the Yuen Long District Council on 16 and 22 July 2003 respectively. Both Committees supported the project. 13. We gazetted the proposed works under the Roads (Works, Use and Compensation) Ordinance (Cap. 370) (the Ordinance) on 12 December 2003. We received 11 objections and all of them remained unresolved. Details of the unresolved objections7 are as follows – (a) six objectors objected to the resumption of land as a result of the implementation of the proposed works. They considered that their businesses would be affected adversely. Upon re-examination of the works area, we proposed to reduce the resumption area. The objectors agreed to withdraw their objections subject to the proposed modification; (b) three objectors who were the land owner, tenant and sub-tenant of two lots, objected to the proposed resumption of the lots. The sub-tenant was concerned that the operation of his carparks on the lots would be affected adversely, whilst the land owner and tenant objected on the ground that the proposed resumption would adversely affect their income and would cause legal disputes among the objectors. We explained to them that the resumption was required for the proposed road works. To address their concerns, we proposed to provide temporary run-in for the carparks and allow the handing-over of the affected land by phases to minimise the impact on the operation of the carparks.
Recommended publications
  • San Tin / Lok Ma Chau Development Node Project Profile
    Civil Engineering and Development Department San Tin / Lok Ma Chau Development Node Project Profile Final | May 2021 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements Ove Arup & Partners Hong Kong Ltd of our client. Level 5 Festival Walk It is not intended for and should not be 80 Tat Chee Avenue relied upon by any third party and no Kowloon Tong responsibility is undertaken to any third Kowloon party. Hong Kong www.arup.com Job number 271620 Civil Engineering and Development Department San Tin / Lok Ma Chau Development Node Project Profile Contents Page 1 Basic Information 3 1.1 Project Title 3 1.2 Purpose and Nature of Project 3 1.3 Name of Project Proponent 3 1.4 Location and Scale of Project and History of Site 3 1.5 Number and Types of Designated Projects to be Covered by the Project Profile 4 1.6 Name and Telephone Number of Contact Person 7 2 Outline of Planning and Implementation Programme 8 2.1 Project Implementation 8 2.2 Project Time Table 8 2.3 Interactions with Other Projects 8 3 Possible Impacts on the Environment 9 3.1 General 9 3.2 Air Quality 9 3.3 Noise 9 3.4 Water Quality 10 3.5 Waste Management 11 3.6 Land Contamination 11 3.7 Hazard to Life 11 3.8 Landfill Gas Hazard 12 3.9 Ecology 12 3.10 Agriculture and Fisheries 14 3.11 Cultural Heritage 14 3.12 Landscape and Visual 14 4 Major Elements of the Surrounding Environment 16 4.1 Surrounding Environment including Existing and Planned Sensitive Receivers 16 4.2 Air Quality 17 4.3 Noise 17 4.4 Water Quality 17 4.5 Waste Management 17 4.6 Land Contamination
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Infrastructure and Traffic Review
    Transport Infrastructure and Traffic Review Planning Department October 2016 Hong Kong 2030+ 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 PREFACE ........................................................... 1 5 POSSIBLE TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT 2 CHALLENGES ................................................... 2 ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE STRATEGIC Changing Demographic Profile .............................................2 GROWTH AREAS ............................................. 27 Unbalanced Spatial Distribution of Population and Synopsis of Strategic Growth Areas ................................. 27 Employment ........................................................................3 Strategic Traffic and Transport Directions ........................ 30 Increasing Growth in Private Vehicles .................................6 Possible Traffic and Transport Arrangements ................. 32 Increasing Cross-boundary Travel with Pearl River Delta Region .......................................................................7 3 FUTURE TRANSPORT NETWORK ................... 9 Railways as Backbone ...........................................................9 Future Highway Network at a Glance ................................11 Connecting with Neighbouring Areas in the Region ........12 Transport System Performance ..........................................15 4 STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTIONS FROM TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT PERSPECTIVE ................................................. 19 Transport and Land Use Optimisation ...............................19 Railways Continue to be
    [Show full text]
  • NR92 Destinations : Fairview Park, Yuen Long – Tsuen Wan Routeing
    Residents’ Service Route No. : NR92 Destinations : Fairview Park, Yuen Long – Tsuen Wan Routeing (Fairview Park – Tsuen Wan) : via Fairview Park Road South, Fairview Park Road West, Fairview Park Road North, Fairview Park Road East, Fairview Park Road South, Fairview Park Boulevard, Fairview Park roundabout, slip road, San Tin Highway, Yuen Long Highway, Tsing Long Highway, Tuen Mun Road, Castle Peak Road, Sai Lau Kok Road, Wai Tsuen Road, Tsuen Kam roundabout, Tai Ho Road North, Tai Ho Road, Sha Tsui Road and Yuen Tun Circuit. Stopping Places: To Tsuen Wan (Outbound Journeys) Pick Up/Set Down : ^*1. Fairview Park Road South near Lotus Road (Outer Terminal Point) 2. Stops within Fairview Park *3. Fairview Park Boulevard near Castle Peak Road #4. Tai Ho Road Flyover layby near KMB No. 51 bus stop (Tsuen Wan Bound) #5. Yuen Tun Circuit near Tai Ho Road (Inner Terminal Point) * Picking up only # Setting down only ^ Interchange point of outbound journeys and inbound journeys Departure time : Mondays to Fridays Saturdays (except Public Holidays) (except public holidays) 7.15 a.m. 8.00 a.m. 7.30 a.m. 8.00 a.m.(2 departures) Routeing (Tsuen Wan – Fairview Park) : via Yuen Tun Circuit, Sha Tsui Road, Tai Ho Road, Sai Lau Kok Road, Wai Tsuen Road, Miu Kong Street, Castle Peak Road, Tuen Mun Road, Tsing Long Highway, Yuen Long Highway, San Tin Highway, Fairview Park roundabout, Fairview Park Boulevard and , Fairview Park Road South. Stopping Places: To Fairview Park (Inbound Journeys) Pick Up/Set Down : *1. Yuen Tun Circuit near Tai Ho Road (Inner Terminal Point) *2.
    [Show full text]
  • LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL PANEL on TRANSPORT Progress Update on the Installation of Speed Enforcement Camera and Red Light Camera
    CB(1)477/03-04(02) LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL PANEL ON TRANSPORT Progress Update on the Installation of Speed Enforcement Camera and Red Light Camera Systems Introduction This paper updates Members on the progress of the installation of speed enforcement camera and red light camera systems. Background Speed Enforcement Cameras 2. Driving in excess of speed limits on the road has contributed to the occurrence and severity of most traffic accidents. Overseas experience shows that installation of speed enforcement cameras (SECs) at strategic locations is a useful means to combat speeding effectively. 3. Before January 1999, there were only 10 locations along Tolo Highway and Fanling Highway that were installed with SEC on- site equipment. In January 1999, we consulted this Panel on our proposal to expand the coverage of SECs to 60 other locations at strategic roads and expressways, and to place eight cameras at these locations on a rotational basis. The funding requirement for the procurement of cameras and computer systems, installation works, testing of equipment and contingencies was estimated to be $25.16m. Members supported the proposal. We subsequently secured the Finance Committee (FC)’s funding approval for the project in July 1999. However, as the price of the successful bid was lower than our estimate, we decided to add another 15 locations to the project, then making a total of 75 locations. The project was scheduled to be completed by September 2002. The list of locations is at Annex A. - 2 - Red Light Cameras 4. The red light camera (RLC) system aims to deter drivers from red light jumping which accounts for more than 80% of traffic signal offences.
    [Show full text]
  • 41912405 Masters Thesis CHEUNG Siu
    University of Queensland School of Languages & Comparative Cultural Studies Master of Arts in Chinese Translation and Interpreting CHIN7180 - Thesis Translation of Short Texts: A case study of street names in Hong Kong Student: Shirmaine Cheung Supervisor: Professor Nanette Gottlieb June 2010 ©2010 The Author Not to be reproduced in any way except for the purposes of research or study as permitted by the Copyright Act 1968 Abstract The topic of this research paper is “Translation of Short Texts: A case study of street names in Hong Kong”. It has been observed that existing translation studies literature appears to cater mainly for long texts. This suggests that there may be a literature gap with regard to short text translation. Investigating how short texts are translated would reveal whether mainstream translation theories and strategies are also applicable to such texts. Therefore, the objectives of the paper are two-fold. Firstly, it seeks to confirm whether there is in fact a gap in the existing literature on short texts by reviewing corpuses of leading works in translation studies. Secondly, it investigates how short texts have been translated by examining the translation theories and strategies used. This is done by way of a case study on street names in Hong Kong. The case study also seeks to remedy the possible paucity of translation literature on short texts by building an objective and representative database to function as an effective platform for examining how street names have been translated. Data, including street names in English and Chinese, are collected by way of systematic sampling from the entire data population.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination and Delineation of Boundaries of Expressways
    Traffic Advice Determination and Delineation of Boundaries of Expressways Motorists are advised that the roads and the unleased Government land which is not a road immediately adjacent thereto listed in the second column below have been designated as expressways in G.N. 8028 published on 19 October 2018. The boundaries of each of the expressways have subsequently been determined. The boundaries of the relevant expressways are delineated in the plans deposited in the Land Registry for public inspection. The number of the plan relating to each of the relevant expressways is shown in the third column below. Appropriate traffic signs are provided on site to guide the motorists. Item Roads Deposited Plan Number (a) Island Eastern Corridor from its junction with Victoria Park Road to EX-HK-1 its junction with Wing Tai Road; (b) Kwun Tong Bypass from its junction with Lei Yue Mun Road to its EX-KL-2 junction with Prince Edward Road East; (c) West Kowloon Highway; and Tsing Kwai Highway from its junction EX-KN-3 with West Kowloon Highway to Kwai Chung Road and Tsuen Wan Road; (d) Tsuen Wan Road from its junction with Kwai Chung Road to its EX-NT-4a junction with Tuen Mun Road; (revised on 21 December 2015) (e) Tuen Mun Road from its junction with Tsuen Wan Road and Castle EX-NT-4a Peak Road - Tsuen Wan to its junction with Wong Chu Road ; (revised on 21 December 2015) EX-NT-5 (f) Yuen Long Highway from Lam Tei Interchange to Shap Pat Heung EX-NT-6 Interchange; (g) Tsing Long Highway from Tai Lam Tunnel to its junction with San EX-NT-7a Tin Highway;
    [Show full text]
  • To Browse the Annual Traffic Census 2018 on the Internet
    THE ANNUAL TRAFFIC CENSUS -2018- TSSD Publication No. 19CAB1 While every caution has been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication, the Transport Department of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government is not to be held liable for any loss or damage arising from the use of these data. Acknowledgement should be made in reproducing in any manner in whole or part of this publication. TRAFFIC SURVEY AND SUPPORT DIVISION August 2019 © THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION SUMMARY During the year 2018, the annual average daily traffic (A.A.D.T.) in the territory showed the following changes as compared with that of 2017: General There were 784 434 vehicles licensed in Hong Kong at the end of 2018, representing an increase of 2.38% when compared with the corresponding figure in 2017. This total accounted for 90.7% of the number of registered vehicles. The highest percentage increase was found in private light bus, with a growth of 9.0%. There were 565 213 private cars licensed at the end of 2018. The number of franchised buses licensed was 6 151, an increase of 2.8% over 2017. The total number of goods vehicles licensed in 2018 was 117 567, showing an increase of 2.5% over 2017. During the year, road travel in the territory amounted to 38.25 million vehicle- kilometres per day. Of this total, 6.00 million vehicle-kilometres occurred on Hong Kong Island while 8.53 million vehicle-kilometres and 23.72 million vehicle- kilometres occurred in Kowloon and the New Territories respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration's Paper on Development of Lok Ma Chau Loop
    LC Paper No. CB(1)449/17-18(03) For discussion on 16 January 2018 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL PANEL ON COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY PWP Item No. 748CL – Development of Lok Ma Chau Loop - land decontamination and advance engineering works PWP Item No. 760CL – Development of Lok Ma Chau Loop – main works package 1 PURPOSE This paper briefs Members on our proposals to - (a) upgrade 748CL to Category A at an estimated cost of $517.6 million in money-of-the-day (MOD) prices for carrying out land decontamination within the Lok Ma Chau Loop (the Loop) and advance engineering works (advance works); (b) upgrade part of 760CL, entitled “Development of Lok Ma Chau Loop – main works package 1 – detailed design and site investigation” to Category A at an estimated cost of $268.3 million in MOD prices for engaging consultants to undertake detailed design and site investigation for the site formation of the Loop and associated infrastructure works; and (c) retain the remainder of 760CL in Category B. PROJECT SCOPE AND NATURE Advance works 2. 748CL which we propose to upgrade to Category A comprises - (a) land decontamination treatment within the Loop; (b) establishment of an Ecological Area (EA) within the Loop; 1 (c) construction of a temporary access to the Loop, comprising an approximately 60 metre (m) long temporary vehicular bridge across the old Shenzhen River meander, minor improvement works to Ha Wan Tsuen East Road and other ancillary works; (d) construction of temporary noise barriers and miscellaneous road works along Lok Ma Chau Road; (e) ground treatment to the first batch of land parcels within the Loop for development of buildings and associated facilities under Phase 1 of the Hong Kong-Shenzhen Innovation and Technology Park (the Park) and the western electricity substation; and (f) implementation of environmental mitigation measures for the works mentioned in paragraphs 2(a) to (e) above.
    [Show full text]
  • RNTPC Paper No. A/YL-ST/556 for Consideration by the Rural and New Town Planning Committee on 20.9.2019
    RNTPC Paper No. A/YL-ST/556 For Consideration by the Rural and New Town Planning Committee on 20.9.2019 APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION UNDER SECTION 16 OF THE TOWN PLANNING ORDINANCE APPLICATION NO. A/YL-ST/556 Applicant : Fu Hop Yick Management Limited represented by Lanbase Surveyors Limited Site : Lots 180 RP and 182 S.C RP in D.D. 102 and Adjoining Government Land (GL), San Tin, Yuen Long Site Area : About 336 m² (including GL of about 7 m²) Lease : Block Government Lease (demised for agricultural use) (no structures are allowed to be erected without prior approval of the Government) Plan : Approved San Tin Outline Zoning Plan (OZP) No. S/YL-ST/8 Zoning : “Village Type Development” (“V”) Application : Proposed Temporary Shop and Services for a Period of 3 Years 1. The Proposal 1.1 The applicant seeks planning permission to use the application site (the Site) for proposed temporary shop and services for a period of 3 years (Plan A-1). According to the Notes for the “V” zone of the OZP, ‘Shop and Services’ is a Column 2 use, which requires planning permission from the Town Planning Board (the Board). The Site is currently occupied by a vacant 3-storey temporary structure, and is not the subject of any previous applications. 1.2 According to the applicant, the application is to provide shop and services uses such as retail shop, fast food shop and commercial service to serve the local community. As shown on the layout plan at Drawing A-1 and Plan A-2, the Site is accessible from the east off Castle Peak Road – San Tin.
    [Show full text]
  • Note for Public Works Subcommittee of Finance Committee
    For information PWSCI(2003-04)20 NOTE FOR PUBLIC WORKS SUBCOMMITTEE OF FINANCE COMMITTEE Supplementary Information on 788TH – New boundary bridge between Lok Ma Chau and Huanggang INTRODUCTION In considering PWSC(2003-04)44 on 788TH “New boundary bridge between Lok Ma Chau and Huanggang” at the Public Works Subcommittee meeting on 25 June 2003, Members requested the Administration to provide supplementary information, with plans, on various measures to improve the traffic condition in the vicinity of the San Tin Public Transport Interchange (PTI). THE ADMINISTRATION’S RESPONSE 2. Measures that have been taken and those being planned/taken to improve the traffic condition in the vicinity of the San Tin PTI are as follows - (a) The northbound slip road of San Tin Highway was widened in mid-2001 to facilitate movements of passenger vehicles to the San Tin Interchange (Item (a) on the attached plan). (b) A bus gate at the entry to the westbound slip road of Fanling Highway was built in February 1999 to facilitate access of coaches to the San Tin Interchange (Item (b) on the attached plan). (c) The San Tin section of Castle Peak Road between the San Tin PTI and the slip road of the San Tin Interchange are being widened from two to three lanes to improve traffic flow from Castle Peak Road to the San Tin Interchange (Item (c) on the attached plan). The works commenced in October 2002 and are scheduled for completion in December 2003. /(d) ….. PWSCI(2003-04)20 Page 2 (d) Southbound San Sham Road will be widened from two to three lanes on its entry to the roundabout of the San Tin Interchange to improve junction capacity (Item (d) on the attached plan).
    [Show full text]
  • Purpose Overview of the Recommended Outline
    Civil Engineering and Development Department Agreement No. CE53/2008(CE) and Planning Department Planning and Engineering Study on Development of Lok Ma Chau Loop - Investigation Technical Report No. 4 - Preferred Land Use Option and Recommended Outline Development Plan Executive Summary Purpose Technical Report No. 4 presents the Recommended Outline Development Plan (RODP) formulated for the Lok Ma Chau Loop (LMC Loop) development and sets out the relevant planning objectives as well as the recommended land use and intensity for the development. The RODP provides the basis for detailed technical assessments to be undertaken (as detailed in Technical Report No. 5) aiming to confirm the engineering and technical feasibility of the proposed developments and infrastructures. The Study Area, consisting of Study Area A (Area A) and Study Area B (Area B) on the Hong Kong side, is shown in Figure 1. Overview of the Recommended Outline Development Plan The Preliminary Outline Development Plan (PODP), as presented in Technical Report No. 2B, set out the planning concepts and principles for developing the LMC Loop in a sustainable manner and proposed a preliminary land use framework to guide the future development of the Loop in terms of spatial land use arrangements, development intensity and building height as well as major infrastructures and transport networks. The PODP was put forward for public consultation during the Stage 1 Public Engagement (PE) completed in January 2011. Taking into account the public views collected in the Stage 1 PE, together with the preliminary results of various technical assessments carried out at that point in time, revisions to the PODP were made in order to address the public views and technical concerns, which form the basis for formulation of the Recommended Outline Development Plan (RODP) for the LMC Loop.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Cultural Heritage Impact
    Planning Department and Agreement No. CE53/2008(CE) Civil Engineering and Development Department Planning and Engineering Study on Development of Lok Ma Chau Loop - Investigation EIA Report 10 Cultural Heritage Impact 10.1 Overview This section presents the assessment of impacts on cultural heritage associated with the construction and operation of LMC Loop. The assessment includes the background information of archaeological heritage, declared monument and built heritage within the assessment area, results of archaeological surveys, the level of potential impact and recommended mitigation measures. In accordance with the findings of the 2012 archaeological survey conducted at Lok Ma Chau Loop, Ma Tso Lung, the areas along Border Road, Ma Tso Lung Road and Ho Sheung Heung Road as well as the proposed alignments of Western Connection Road (including the connection to San Tin Highway), there was no sign of archaeological potential in the surveyed area. Desktop review and field survey has been conducted for historic buildings and direct impacts on them are not expected. There will be minor visual impact from its surrounding development but it can be mitigated by providing plant screening. The cultural heritage impact assessment has been conducted in accordance with the requirements of Annexes 10 and 19 of the TM-EIAO as well as the requirements set out under Clause 3.4.11 of the EIA Study Brief. 10.2 Environmental Legislation, Standards and Guidelines The relevant legislation, standards and guidelines for the assessment and protection of cultural heritage include: • Antiquities and Monument Ordinance; • Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO); • Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines (HKPSG); • Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process; • Guidelines for Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment.
    [Show full text]