DOCSLIB.ORG

The Owens-Colvin Site of the Safford Valley

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Owens-Colvin Site of the Safford Valley THE OWENS-COLVIN SITE OF THE SAFFORD VALLEY By Pam Rule EASTERN ARIZONA COLLEGE MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY PUBLICATION NUMBER 3 I I I I Acknowledgements Many people have contributed to the work that went into the collection, recording and organization of the information embodied in the Owen-Colvin site. Thanks are due first to I Robert and Vema Rae Colvin and Rex and Jayne Owens for permission to excavate on their land. More thanks are due to Rex and Jayne for sharing their knowledge of the site and for providing many kinds of aid to the project. Gay Kinkaid and the Coronado Chapter of the Arizona Archaeological Society contribut­ I ed volunteer labor. You know who you are even if, in some cases, I do not. Members of the Eastern Arizona College Museum Council have contributed in various ways, and Paul Phelps, EAC Public Information Office Director, has been both material help­ I ful and forbearing in the process of producing a printable manuscript. I am especially grateful for the sustained toil of my assistant, Gwen Dodge, who strug­ gled with me through the process of finding, interpreting and rendering into a final I manuscript the notes and manuscript that Pam left us. Of Pat Gilman's editorial contribution I make more mention in the Forward. And, thanks to anyone who made a contribution before I arrived and currently un­ I known to me. W es Jernigan I I I I I I I I I -1- I I Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................2 I Problem Orientation .. ... ..... ........................................... ........... ..................... ................ 3 The Excavations ......................................................... .. .... .............................................. J Architecture ................................................................. .. ................................. ................ 8 I Table 1; Internal Room Dimensions ........................................................................ 14 . Chapter 2 Ceramics ............................................................................................................. 15 Utilitarian Wares ................................... .. .. .. ................................................................ 15 I Red-on-buff Ceramics ................................................................................................. 15 Red-on-brown Ceramics ........................................................................................... .16 McDonald Corrugated Pottery ......................_. .. ......................................................... 17 I White Mountain Red ware Pottery .......................................................................... 17 Black-on-white Ceramics ......................... .............. .................................................... 18 Thirteenth and Fourteenth Century Ceramics ..................................................... 18 I Miscellaneous Types ......... ................. .. ................................................... ... ...... .......... .. 18 Other Ceramic Artifacts ............... ......... .. ... .................... ..................... .. .. ........ :........... 21 Worked Sherds ..... ........... .. ................................... ............. ..... ... .. .................... 21 Nose Plug .................................................................................... .. ........... ..... ... 21 I Tesserae ......................................... .. ... .............................. ... ...................... .... ... .21 Pipe .................................... ............................... ................................................ .25 Summary and Conclusions ..................................... .. .. .. ..................... ...................... 25 I Chapter 3 Figurines and Effigy Vessels ................................ ........................................... 28 Human Effigy ...................................................................................... ......................... 28 I Deer Figurine ................................................................................................................28 Zoomorphic Fragment ...................................... .. ..................... .. .... .. ......... ...... .. ........ 31 Big Hom Sheep Effigy ................................ .. ........ ... .. ...... .. ... .. ..................................... 31 "Dog" or "Deer" Headed Scoops ............................... .. ......... .... ..... .................... ... ..... 31 I Effigy Lug .................... .. ..................................... ............................................................ 32 Discussion ......................................................................... ... ........ ............ ....... .. ..... .. ..... 32 I Chapter 4 Chipped Stone ...................................................... ... .. .... ................. .. .. .. .......... .. .34 Debitage ................................................................... .... .. .......... .......... ... .. ... ... .. .... .......... .. 34 U nifaces .............................................................................................. ..................... .. .... 34 Table 2; Lithic Raw Material Use .................................................... .. .... .................... 37 I Bifaces Projectile Points .......... ....................................... .. ...... ...... ...................... ......... 37 Drills ............................................................. .............. ....................................... 39 Agave Knives ............................................................................ ... ................... 39 Quartz Crystals ................................. .. .. .... ................. ... ........... ................ ....... .... ......... .40 Quartz Nodule ....... ....... ............................................................................. ... ........ ..... .. 40 I Turquoise ........................... .. ........ ............ .. .................................................... .... .. ....... ... 40 I I I - 2- I Chapter 5 Groundstone ........ .. .. .. ...... .... .................................................................... .. ....... 42 Metates ............................ ... .......... .......... ....................... .............................. ..... .............. 42 Manos ........ .... ..... ... ....... ....... ..................... ... ...... .. .. .. .... ... .............. .... ..... ........ .. .... .......... .42 I Pestles ...... ....................................... ....... ..... ... .... ....... .. ... .. ..................... ... ............ ..... ...... 42 Mortar ........ ................... ...... .. ............................. .......... ...... ... ..... ..... ............. ....... .......... .43 Stone Bowls ........................ ... .. .. .............. .. ................. .. ......... ............................. .......... 43 I Weights .. .... ... ... ................ ..... ...... ....................... ............... ... ................... .. .... ......... ..... ... 43 Stone Ring ....... .. ...... ..... .... .... .. .. ......... ........ ........... ............................................. ... ...... .. .43 Axes ................... ................ .... ... ..... .......... .... ....... ....................................... ....... ............. .43 Pigment Manos ... ...................................... .... .... ..... ... .......... ...................................... ... 44 I Pottery Anvil .... .... .. ........................ ................................. .... ............ ............................ .44 Palette ................ ............................................................... ...... ....... .... .... .... .....................45 Hammerstones ....... ... ..................... .. .. ............... ...... ..... ........................................ ....... .45 I Polishing Stones ........... ... ....... ............. ... ............. .......... .. ......... ......... ............... ........... 45 Smoothing Stones ............ ...................... .. ...... ...... .. ....... ..... ..... .......... .. ... .. ...... ... ... .. ..... 45 Shaft Smoother ..... .. ... ... .... ....... ... ............ .. .... ... ............................................ .. ............. .46 Abraders .. ............. ........ .. .... ..... .... .... ..... .. ............... .... .. ....... ..... .... .. ., ..... ...... ........ .... ........ 46 I Pecking Stones ... ...................................................... .... .................. ............ .. .............. ... 46 Chapter 6 Shell ........... ... ..... ......... ............... ............................ .. .... .... ..... .... .............. ........... .4 7 I Trumpet Fragment ...................................................................................................... 47 Whole Shell Beads ............................ .... ................................................... .. ................. 47 Tinklers ........................................... ............................................................................... 47 I Bracelets ................................ ................... .. ....................................... ,. ........................... 48 Pendants ......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Postclassic Aztec Figurines and Domestic Ritual
    Copyright by Maribel Rodriguez 2010 The Thesis Committee for Maribel Rodriguez Certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: Postclassic Aztec Figurines and Domestic Ritual APPROVED BY SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: Supervisor: Julia Guernsey David Stuart Postclassic Aztec Figurines and Domestic Ritual by Maribel Rodriguez, B.A. Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts The University of Texas at Austin December 2010 Dedication Esto esta dedicado en especial para mi familia. Acknowledgements There are my academicians and friends I would like to extend my sincere gratitude. This research began thanks to Steve Bourget who encouraged and listened to my initial ideas and early stages of brainstorming. To Mariah Wade and Enrique Rodriguez-Alegria I am grateful for all their help, advice, and direction to numerous vital resources. Aztec scholars Michael Smith, Jeffrey and Mary Parsons, Susan T. Evans, and Salvador Guilliem Arroyo who provided assistance in the initial process of my research and offered scholarly resources and material. A special thank you to my second reader David Stuart for agreeing to be part of this project. This research project was made possible from a generous contribution from the Art and Art History Department Traveling grant that allowed me the opportunity to travel and complete archival research at the National American Indian History Museum. I would also like to thank Fausto Reyes Zataray for proofreading multiple copies of this draft; Phana Phang for going above and beyond to assist and support in any way possible; and Lizbeth Rodriguez Dimas and Rosalia Rodriguez Dimas for their encouragement and never ending support.
    [Show full text]
  • Born of Clay Ceramics from the National Museum of The
    bornclay of ceramics from the National Museum of the American Indian NMAI EDITIONS NATIONAL MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN INDIAN SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION WASHINGTON AND NEW YORk In partnership with Native peoples and first edition cover: Maya tripod bowl depicting a their allies, the National Museum of 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 bird, a.d. 1–650. campeche, Mexico. the American Indian fosters a richer Modeled and painted (pre- and shared human experience through a library of congress cataloging-in- postfiring) ceramic, 3.75 by 13.75 in. more informed understanding of Publication data 24/7762. Photo by ernest amoroso. Native peoples. Born of clay : ceramics from the National Museum of the american late Mississippian globular bottle, head of Publications, NMai: indian / by ramiro Matos ... [et a.d. 1450–1600. rose Place, cross terence Winch al.].— 1st ed. county, arkansas. Modeled and editors: holly stewart p. cm. incised ceramic, 8.5 by 8.75 in. and amy Pickworth 17/4224. Photo by Walter larrimore. designers: ISBN:1-933565-01-2 steve Bell and Nancy Bratton eBook ISBN:978-1-933565-26-2 title Page: tile masks, ca. 2002. Made by Nora Naranjo-Morse (santa clara, Photography © 2005 National Museum “Published in conjunction with the b. 1953). santa clara Pueblo, New of the american indian, smithsonian exhibition Born of Clay: Ceramics from Mexico. Modeled and painted ceram institution. the National Museum of the American - text © 2005 NMai, smithsonian Indian, on view at the National ic, largest: 7.75 by 4 in. 26/5270. institution. all rights reserved under Museum of the american indian’s Photo by Walter larrimore.
    [Show full text]
  • Aztec Figurine Studies. in the Post-Classic
    Foreword: Aztec Figurine Studies Michael E. Smith Arizona State University Ceramic figurines are one of the mystery artifact categories of ancient Mesoamerica. Although figurines are abundant at archaeological sites from the Early Formative period through Early Colonial Spanish times, we know very little about them. How were figurines used? Who used them? What was their symbolic meaning? Did these human-like objects portray deities or people? Most scholars believe that ceramic figurines were used in some way in rites or ceremonies, but it has been difficult to find convincing evidence for their specific uses or meanings. The lack of knowledge about the use and significance of ceramic figurines is particularly striking for the Aztec culture of central Mexico. 1 Early Spanish chroniclers devoted literally thousands of pages to descriptions of Aztec religion, yet they rarely mentioned figurines. Ritual codices depict numerous gods, ceremonies, and mythological scenes, yet figurines are not included. Today we have a richly detailed understanding of many aspects of Aztec religion, but figurines play only a minor role in this body of knowledge. An important reason for the omission of figurines from the early colonial textual accounts is that these objects were almost certainly used primarily by women—in the home—for rites of curing, fertility, and divination (Cyphers Guillén 1993; Heyden 1996; Smith 2002), and the Spanish friars who wrote the major accounts of Aztec culture had little knowledge of Aztec women or domestic life (Burkhart 1997; Rodríguez-Shadow 1997). Ceramic figurines can provide crucial information on Aztec domestic ritual and life. They offer a window on these worlds that are very poorly described in written sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Columbian Art & Architecture Syllabus, Spring 2019
    Pre-Columbian Art & Architecture Syllabus, Spring 2019 Course Information Course title: Pre-Columbian Art and Architecture Course prefix and number: ARTH 3353 Course meeting location: Fox Fine Arts A458 Course meeting times: MWF 8:30-9:20 Instructor Contact Information Instructor's name: Anne Perry Instructor's office #: Fox Fine Arts A354 Instructor's office hours: Mondays and Wednesdays 11:30 – 1:00 Instructor's phone & email: 747-8744 or 747-5181 Email: [email protected] (best way to reach me) Instructor Introduction Professor Perry has a long-standing passion for the visual arts. She studied art history at the University of New Mexico, where she received her M. A. in Pre-Columbian art. She has taught a variety of art history courses at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and here at UTEP. She and her family have lived in El Paso for many years. Course Description This course is an introduction to the rich and varied history of art and architecture of ancient Mesoamerica and South America. Major monuments and art objects in a variety of media will be studied in terms of style and original socio-political or sacred context. This class is geared to students at the Junior-Senior level from all academic disciplines with an interest in the artistic heritage of Latin America. Students need not have had any prior experience in art history to succeed in this class, however, regular attendance at lectures and participation in class discussions are fundamental to an understanding of the material presented in this course. Course Format: In Class and Online Course material is presented in a lecture format, utilizing visual material in the form of digitized images.
    [Show full text]
  • Ceramics and the Spanish Conquest E Early Americas: History and Culture
    Ceramics and the Spanish Conquest e Early Americas: History and Culture General Editor Alexander Geurds, Leiden University Editorial Board Willem Adelaar, Leiden University Nikolai Grube, Bonn University John Hoopes, University of Kansas Maarten Jansen, Leiden University Arthur Joyce, University of Colorado Michael Smith, Arizona State University Eric Taladoire, Sorbonne Laura Van Broekhoven, National Museum of Ethnology, Leiden VOLUME 2 e titles published in this series are listed at brill.nl/eahc Ceramics and the Spanish Conquest Response and Continuity of Indigenous Pottery Technology in Central Mexico By Gilda Hernández Sánchez LEIDEN • BOSTON 2012 e digital edition of this title is published in Open Access. is book is printed on acid-free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hernández Sánchez, Gilda. Ceramics and the Spanish conquest : response and continuity of indigenous pottery technology in central Mexico / by Gilda Hernández Sánchez. p. cm. — (e early Americas: history and culture vol.2) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-90-04-20440-9 (hardback : alk. paper) 1. Indian pottery—Mexico. 2. Indians of Mexico—Material culture. 3. Indians of Mexico— Antiquities. 4. Pottery cra—Mexico—History. 5. Mexico—Antiquities. 6. Mexico— History—Conquest, 1519-1540. 7. Mexico—History—Spanish colony, 1540-1810. I. Title. F1219.3.P8H37 2012 972’.01—dc23 2011035865 ISSN 1875-3264 ISBN 978 90 04 20440 9 Copyright 2012 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, e Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Global Oriental, Hotei Publishing, IDC Publishers, Martinus Nijho Publishers and VSP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Olmec Bloodletting: an Iconographic Study
    Olmec Bloodletting: An Iconographic Study ROSEMARY A. JOYCE Peabody Museum, Harvard University RICHARD EDGING and KARL LORENZ University of Illinois, Urbana SUSAN D. GILLESPIE Illinois State University One of the most important of all Maya rituals was ceremonial bloodletting, either by drawing a cord through a hole in the tongue or by passing a stingray spine, pointed bone, or maguey thorn through the penis. Stingray spines used in the rite have often been found in Maya caches; in fact, so significant was this act among the Classic Maya that the perforator itself was worshipped as a god. This ritual must also have been frequently practiced among the earlier Olmec... Michael D. Coe in The Origins of Maya Civilization The iconography of bloodletting in the Early iconographic elements indicating autosacrifice, and Middle Formative (ca. 1200-500 B.C.) Olmec and glyphs referring to bloodletting. Most scenes symbol system is the focus of the present study.1 shown take place after the act of bloodletting and We have identified a series of symbols in large- include holding paraphernalia of autosacrifice, and small-scale stone objects and ceramics repre- visions of blood serpents enclosing ancestors, and senting perforators and a zoomorphic supernatural scattering blood in a ritual gesture. The parapher- associated with bloodletting. While aspects of nalia of bloodletting may also be held, not simply this iconography are comparable to later Classic as indications that an act of autosacrifice has Lowland Maya iconography of bloodletting, its taken place, but as royal regalia. Two elements deployment in public and private contexts dif- are common both in scenes of bloodletting and as fers, suggesting fundamental variation in the way royal regalia: the personified bloodletter, which bloodletting was related to political legitimation Coe (1977a:188) referred to as a god, and bands in the Formative Olmec and Classic Maya cases.
    [Show full text]
  • ANTHROPOLOGY IS MORE THAN a DISCUSSION ABOUT SCIENCE By
    VOLUME 34 NUMBER 1 SPRING 2011 ANTHROPOLOGY IS MORE THAN A new mission of the AAA of ―promoting a public DISCUSSION ABOUT SCIENCE understanding" of humankind. As my term as President of the Society for Archaeological Sciences is coming to an end, the By Sandra L. Lopez Varela discussion is meaningful to me, not only because of the still unnoticed concerns I raised during my short lived participation in the AAA LRP committee in 2008, as it was dissolved by the Executive Board in the spring of 2009, but also, for the relevance it has to SAS, an international society, fostering an ethical use of science and technology for the benefit of humankind. Being an international society, such as SAS, requires an understanding that there are diverse and shifting ways of approaching archaeology around the world. This understanding stands for challenges in serving the needs of its members, for example, finding financial support to bring those less fortunate to travel to meetings, both faculty and students. Equally important in building SAS as an international society is the awareness that archaeological sciences develop in the SAS President Sandra Lopez Varela, second from left, at a academia, the applied private and public sectors, even in a free- recent meeting in Mexico focused on interdisciplinary research lancing context. Despite that several countries, such as the US and integration of academic and industrial sciences. and Mexico, shared the same disciplinary forefather, the growth of anthropology in my country encompasses a greater number Along my professional career, I have been given the of disciplines of what anthropology is currently to the AAA.
    [Show full text]
  • Maiolica Ole : Spanish & Mexican Decorative Traditions
    MAIOLICA OLE : SPANISH & MEXICAN DECORATIVE TRADITIONS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Florence C Lister | 176 pages | 01 Jun 2003 | Museum of New Mexico Press | 9780890133897 | English | New Mexico, United States Maiolica Ole : Spanish & Mexican Decorative Traditions PDF Book Archivo:Assiette Castel Durante Lille The diversity of styles can best be seen in a comparative study of albarello produced between the 15th and 18th centuries. The Moors that came to the Iberian Peninsula were the originators of majolica. Accessories on Sale. Gorky Gonzalez Pottery. Talavera is commonly used for both Spanish and for Mexican ceramics, but it originates from Spain in Talavera de la Reina, in the province of Toledo and in the region of Castilla La Mancha. All three are ceramics that have their origin in what was the Iberian Peninsula and is now Spain. Kilns required wood, which contributed to deforestation even of the unplantable hillsides, at ever higher altitudes, as well as a source of suitable clay. Ann Kary Pewter. This was how Mexican Talavera emerged. An important mid-sixteenth century document for the techniques of maiolica painting is the treatise of Cipriano Piccolpasso , not a professional potter himself. Please contact us for details. Gift Certificates. By the s, Mexican silver production exceeds that of Peru. During the Renaissance, the term maiolica referred solely to lusterware , including both Italian-made and Spanish imports, but eventually the term came to be used when describing ceramics made in Italy, lustered or not, of tin-glazed earthenware. Purses and Bags. Wall Planters. Delivery Information. IF this is your interest, then you will find the book helpful, if you are looking for Spanish Maiolica, then you will find little info here.
    [Show full text]
  • Reduced Lead Exposure Following a Sensitization Program in Rural Family Homes Producing Traditional Mexican Ceramics
    Tamayo-Ortiz M and Navia-Antezana J. Reduced Lead Exposure Following a Sensitization Program in Rural Family Homes Producing Traditional Mexican Ceramics. Annals of Global Health. 2018; 84(2), pp. 285–291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29024/aogh.916 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Reduced Lead Exposure Following a Sensitization Program in Rural Family Homes Producing Traditional Mexican Ceramics Marcela Tamayo-Ortiz*,† and Jaime Navia-Antezana‡ Background: Traditional ceramics are a cultural heritage in Mexico, used by the general population in everyday life. These ceramics are glazed with lead oxide and are usually produced in households that share living and working spaces. Glazing is usually performed by women, and children are not restrained from the work space and frequently help, resulting in high levels of lead exposure for all. Interventions that promote a change in technology (such as lead-free glazes or efficient kilns) are often unrealistic for pot- ters with fewer economic resources who depend on their production as their main income. Interventions focusing on exposure prevention (rather than a technology change) at the household level are scarce. Methods: Working hand-in-hand with a group of nine women, lay community workers, promotoras, from Santa Fe de Laguna, Michoacán, we developed a program focusing on the self-recognition of health risks. The program was composed of health education (including a lead in blood and bone measurement for women), health/work risk recognition and communication to the community, and work/living area reor- ganization and remediation in three stages: work with 1) promotoras, 2) their extended families, and 3) their community, including talks in elementary schools.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Mexican Folk Art
    IBERIAN AND LATIN AMERICAN STUDIES Women in Mexican Folk Art WMFA.indd 1 26/11/2010 12:18:55 Series Editors Professor David George (Swansea University) Professor Paul Garner (University of Leeds) Editorial Board David Frier (University of Leeds) Laura Shaw (University of Liverpool) Gareth Walters (Swansea University) Rob Stone (Swansea University) David Gies (University of Virginia) Catherine Davies (University of Nottingham) Richard Cleminson (University of Leeds) WMFA.indd 2 26/11/2010 12:18:55 IBERIAN AND LATIN AMERICAN STUDIES Women in Mexican Folk Art Of Promises, Betrayals, Monsters and Celebrities ELI BARTRA UNIVERSITY OF WALES PRESS CARDIFF 2011 WMFA.indd 3 26/11/2010 12:18:55 © Eli Bartra, 2011 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any material form (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means and whether or not transiently or incidentally to some other use of this publication) without the written permission of the copyright owner except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Applications for the copyright owner’s written permission to reproduce any part of this publication should be addressed to the University of Wales Press, 10 Columbus Walk, Brigantine Place, Cardiff, CF10 4UP. www.uwp.co.uk British Library CIP A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN 978–0–7083–2347–2 (hardback) 978–0–7083–2364–9 (paperback) e-ISBN 978–0–7083–2348–9 The right of Eli Bartra to be identified as author of this work has been asserted in accordance with sections 77, 78 and 79 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Porfirian Sugar and Rum Production in Northeastern Yucatán
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Bittersweet: Porfirian Sugar and Rum Production in Northeastern Yucatán A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology by John R Gust June 2016 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Scott L. Fedick, Chairperson Dr. Wendy Ashmore Dr. Karl Taube Dr. Robert W. Patch Copyright by John R Gust June 2016 The Dissertation of John R Gust is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgements Permission to conduct this research was granted by the Consejo de Arqueología of the Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia (INAH). I would like to express my thanks to Dra María de los Angeles Olay Barrientos, and the other Consejo members for their support. In Quintana Roo, Arqlga. Adriana Velázquez Morlet, director of INAH Quintana Roo, as well as the staff for all the help they provided. Thank you to Drs. John Morris and Jaime Awe of the Belize Institute of Archaeology for allowing me access to the artifact collection from San Pedro Siris and for permission to visit and photograph Belizean sugar mill sites. This research was possible with the aid of small grants from UC-MEXUS and a UCR Humanities grant. A project like this is impossible without the aid of a multitude of people including some who are so behind the scenes whose name I will never know. I want to next thank those people, and the people whose names I have forgotten for their important contributions. My dissertation committee, especially my advisor Scott Fedick, has supported me constantly throughout this long process.
    [Show full text]
  • Romita Pottery Revisited: a Reassessment of the Provenance of Ceramics from Colonial Mexico by LA-MC-ICP-MS
    Journal of Archaeological Science 37 (2010) 2698e2704 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Archaeological Science journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jas Romita pottery revisited: a reassessment of the provenance of ceramics from Colonial Mexico by LA-MC-ICP-MS Javier G. Iñañez a,b,*, Jeremy J. Bellucci c, Enrique Rodríguez-Alegría d, Richard Ash c, William McDonough c, Robert J. Speakman a a Museum Conservation Institute, Smithsonian Institution, Suitland, MD 20746, USA b Cultura Material i Arqueometria Universitat de Barcelona (ARQjUB), Facultat de Geografia i Història, Universitat de Barcelona, c/Montalegre, 6, 08001 Barcelona, Spain c Department of Geology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA d Department of Anthropology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA article info abstract Article history: The origin of Romita pottery has been a controversial topic during the last three decades of Colonial Received 16 March 2010 Mexico archaeological studies. Lead isotopic analyses of glaze coatings of Spanish and Mexican pottery, Received in revised form and Romita ceramics unearthed from the archaeological site of the Metropolitan Cathedral in Mexico City 3 June 2010 provide evidence that support a Mexican origin. Accepted 8 June 2010 Ó 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Romita pottery Pb isotopes LA-MC-ICP-MS Colonial Mexico 1. Introduction 2003) because it distinct from, yet similar to, traditional Spanish majolica and other contemporary European glazed ceramics. Romita pottery1, also known as Indígena ware (Lister and Lister, Although similar in many ways to Spanish majolica, Romita pottery 1982) or Loza Indígena (Fournier et al., 2007), is found in greatest has been considered by some researchers to be an indigenous abundance in Colonial period contexts in Mexico City (Lister and imitation of Spanish tin-glazed ceramics (e.g., Lister and Lister, Lister, 1982).
    [Show full text]