DOCSLIB.ORG

Pathology Collection of the Rocky Mountain Research Station

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pathology Collection of the Rocky Mountain Research Station United States Department of Agriculture Pathology Collection Forest Service Rocky Mountain of the Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Research Station Report RMRS-GTR-167WWW January 2006 John B. Popp John E. Lundquist Popp, John B.; Lundquist, John E. 2006. Pathology Collection of the Rocky Mountain Research Station. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-167WWW. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 183 p. Abstract ______________________________________ The pathology collection located at the Rocky Mountain Research Station is fairly extensive. The oldest specimen in the collection was acquired in 1871; since then over 4,600 samples have been added. The data associated with the RMRS collection was converted from a card catalog to an electronic database, allowing greater flexibility in sorting and querying. The contents of this report include information on each specimen and are useful for identifying whether a more extensive search of the electronic database is appropriate, as well as historical reference material. Cover photo: Cytospora canker on aspen. Rocky Mountain Research Station Publishing Services Telephone (970) 498-1392 FAX (970) 498-1122 E-mail [email protected] Web site http://www.fs.fed.us/rm Mailing Address Publications Distribution Rocky Mountain Research Station 240 West Prospect Road Fort Collins, CO 80526 Pathology Collection of the Rocky Mountain Research Station John B. Popp John E. Lundquist Introduction ____________________ • Host—The species that the specimen was found on or in, sometimes recorded as unknown, or just to genus, A pathology collection can be a valuable resource as a but usually genus and species. tool for identifying newly collected specimens or a type reference to initially describe a new species. The docu- • Pathogen—The disease that was collected, some- mentation of when and where the pathogen was collected times recorded as unknown, or just to genus, but usually can be valuable as a description of suitable hosts and genus and species. This name has been kept as it was environments, as well as an historic record of occurrences. recorded when the specimen was collected, including The pathology collection located at the Rocky Moun- occasional misspellings, although taxonomists have re- tain Research Station is fairly extensive. The oldest named many species since the collection date. specimen in the collection was acquired in 1871; since • Location—General to specific area the pathogen then over 4600 samples have been added. Most of these was collected, this often includes a nearby town or forest, are from the United States, but others came from Canada, or a prominent land feature such as a river or mountain. Mexico, the Caribbean, South America, Europe, Asia, or • State/Country—A more general location where the northern Africa. pathogen was collected. Usefulness of a collection is dependent on the ability to search through its contents. The data associated with the • Date—When the specimen was collected. RMRS collection was converted from a card catalog to an • Collector(s)—Who added the specimen to the electronic database in part so it could be queried by a collection. number of variables simultaneously, such as host type Some of these specimens have had several name changes and location. The flexibility of this system is a great since being added to this collection. Nomenclature is in improvement over a hard copy, which can only be sorted a constant state of revision as taxonomists reexamine the by one variable for each set of cards. This being said, the relationships among specie and determine which charac- contents of this report are useful for identifying whether teristics to use in separating one from another. Assigning a more extensive search of the electronic database is names in this environment amounts to creating a snap- appropriate, as well as historical reference material. shot in time. While a current name has been included in The records in this report are grouped by host, then the database where possible, this information can be pathogen, then state or country. Wherever possible, the expected to change over time, and will require periodic collection data have been left as they were originally revisions. Some of the names in this collection have no recorded, and therefore reflect the historic nature of the current synonyms, and these specimens need to be reex- collection itself. This includes occasional misspellings, amined by a taxonomist to be brought up to date. incorrect locations, and some blank fields. Here is a brief description of the information included in this report: USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-167WWW. 2006 1 RMRS pathology collection Abies arizonica Fomes pini Ash Cr. drainage, Graham Mts., Crook NF Arizona 7/28/1934 LS Gill, TRM Inner Basin, San Francisco Peaks Arizona 8/26/1916 WH Long Alamitos Cr., Carson NF New Mexico 9/25/1946 JL Mielke 1 mi. below cabin, Inner Basin, San Francisco Peaks Arizona 8/27/1916 WH Long Inner Basin, San Francisco Peaks Arizona 8/26/1916 WH Long Hymenochaete fimbriata Mt. Humphrey, near Flagstaff Arizona 8/25/1916 WH Long Mt. Humphrey, near Flagstaff Arizona 8/25/1916 WH Long Inner Basin, San Francisco Peaks Arizona 8/25/1916 WH Long about 1 mi. above cabin, Inner Basin, San Francisco Arizona 7/26/1916 WH Long Peaks Lenzites sepiaria Inner Basin, San Francisco Peaks Arizona 8/25/1916 WH Long Nectria sp. Columbine RS, Graham Mts., Crook NF Arizona 7/21/1934 LS Gill, DJS Columbine Arizona 7/1934 DJ Stouffer Phlebia albida Inner Basin, San Francisco Peaks Arizona 7/26/1916 WH Long Poria ferruginosa 1 mi. below cabin, Inner Basin, San Francisco Peaks Arizona 8/27/1916 WH Long Stereum hirsutum Montezuma NF Colorado 7/28/1934 DE Ellis, Wilmore Trametes serialis Inner Basin, San Francisco Peaks Arizona 8/25/1916 WH Long Abies arizonica ? Polyporus leucospongia Inner Basin, near Flagstaff Arizona 8/26/1916 WH Long Abies balsamea Aleurodiscus sp. Indian Township Maine 6/11/1934 J.R.H. Ceratocyctis bicolor Pack Forest near Warreneburg New York 7/18/1963 RW Davidson Pack Forest New York 7/24/1963 RW Davidson Ceratocystis nigra Watson Lake, on Alcan Hwy. Alaska 6/30/1965 RW Davidson 2 USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-167WWW. 2006 Isthmiella faulli Mt. Mansfield Vermont 6/21/1951 RF Cain Lirula mirabilis Bear Island, Lake Timagami, Mipissing Dist., Ontario Canada 7/22/1927 GD Darker Lirula nervata Mt. Mansfield Vermont 6/21/1951 RF Cain Bear Island, Lake Timagami, Mipissing Dist., Ontario Canada 6/16/1922 JH Faull Lophodermium autumnale Cattle Island, Lake Timagami, Ontario Canada 9/16/1924 GD Darker Melampsorella elatina Indian Township Maine 6/8/1934 LS Gill Phacidim abietinellum Little White River, Twp 113, Algoma Dist., Ontario Canada 9/15/1956 RF Cain Abies bracteata Lirula nervisequia var. conspicua Cone Pk., Los Padres NF California 11/10/1968 RF Scharpf, FG Hawksworth Cone Pk., Los Padres NF California 7/1/1969 RF Scharpf Lirula sp. Santa Lucia Mts., Monterey Co. California 11/8/1968 RF Scharpf, FG Hawksworth Santa Lucia Mts., Monterey Co. California 11/8/1968 RF Scharpf, FG Hawksworth Lophodermium sp. Santa Lucia Mts., Monterey Co. California 5/25/1905 DR Miller Girard Trail, Los Padres NF, Monterey Co. California 10/1/1974 DR Miller, Edna Miller Abies concolor Aleurodiscus amorphus Safford Arizona 8/25/1934 DJ Stouffer Armillaria mellea Kanabownits Lookout Arizona 9/21/1945 JL Mielke Armillaria mellea (Vahl) ex Fr. Sacramento Mtns. New Mexico 8/17/1930 James Frank Normand Auricularia sp. Sandia Mts., near Albuquerque New Mexico 6/3/1933 WH Long Ceratocystis ventralis Pollock Pines California 8/14/1962 RW Davidson Coniophora corrugis N. rim of Grand Canyon Arizona 6/11/1935 SR Andrews & LS Gill USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-167WWW. 2006 3 Daedalea confragosa Gallegos Can., Pecos NF New Mexico 9/1914 JW O’Byrne Tejano Canyon New Mexico 9/25/1916 WH Long, PW Seay Tejano New Mexico 5/17/1917 WH Long Upper Elk Logging Unit, Mescalero Apache IR New Mexico 5/1/1953 FG Hawksworth Dasyscypha arida Tinkey Flat, Mt. Graham, Safford Arizona 4/20/1935 David J Stouffer Natural Bridge, Bryce Canyon NP Utah 7/17/1953 FG Hawksworth Diplodia sp. Bryce Canyon NP Utah 9/23/1942 JL Mielke, ST Carlson Bryce Canyon NP Utah 8/25/1943 JL Mielke Echinodontium tinctorium Bland New Mexico 6/28/1917 CH Stewart near Alvarado campground, San Carlos RD, Sangre de Colorado 6/27/1963 TE Hinds, FG Cristo Mtns., San Isabel NF Hawksworth Sandia rim New Mexico 6/2/1933 WH Long Red Can., Mountainair New Mexico 7/24/1938 Moberg, Andrews Bill Williams Mtn., Williams Arizona 7/26/1918 LN Goodding Silver Lake Oregon 7/19/1916 AJ Jaenicke 12 mi. from Pecos New Mexico 10/22/1913 WH Long Datil NF New Mexico 9/1915 WH Long Chama New Mexico 9/1917 CS Llewellyn El Porvenir Canyon New Mexico 8/28/1917 CS Llewellyn Mt. Lemon Arizona 5/24/1934 WH Long Maxon Arizona 10/2/1913 WH Long WH Long Vallecitos Cr., Jemez RD, Santa Fe NF New Mexico 6/30/1916 RM Harsch Seven Cabins Can., Lincoln NF New Mexico 7/27/1938 LS Gill, Hackelman, DE Ellis on road to Ellis Ranch New Mexico 9/19/1916 WH Long, PW Seay 7 mi. SW of Wolf Creek Pass, San Juan NF Colorado 6/1/1959 FG Hawksworth Crescent Lake, SE of Pagosa Springs, San Juan NF Colorado 5/29/1934 DE Ellis, Wilmore Fomes annosus Left Fork, Bear Canyon New Mexico 8/2/1917 WH Long Left Fork, Bear Canyon New Mexico 8/2/1917 WH Long Left Fork, Bear Canyon near Albuquerque New Mexico 8/2/1917 WH Long 8 mi.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Development and Evaluation of Rrna Targeted in Situ Probes and Phylogenetic Relationships of Freshwater Fungi
    Development and evaluation of rRNA targeted in situ probes and phylogenetic relationships of freshwater fungi vorgelegt von Diplom-Biologin Christiane Baschien aus Berlin Von der Fakultät III - Prozesswissenschaften der Technischen Universität Berlin zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktorin der Naturwissenschaften - Dr. rer. nat. - genehmigte Dissertation Promotionsausschuss: Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr. sc. techn. Lutz-Günter Fleischer Berichter: Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Ulrich Szewzyk Berichter: Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Felix Bärlocher Berichter: Dr. habil. Werner Manz Tag der wissenschaftlichen Aussprache: 19.05.2003 Berlin 2003 D83 Table of contents INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 MATERIAL AND METHODS .................................................................................................................. 8 1. Used organisms ............................................................................................................................. 8 2. Media, culture conditions, maintenance of cultures and harvest procedure.................................. 9 2.1. Culture media........................................................................................................................... 9 2.2. Culture conditions .................................................................................................................. 10 2.3. Maintenance of cultures.........................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • A Summer Vacation in Arizona
    JUNE 1959 FORTY CENTS IN THIS ISSUE: ASummer Vacation In Arizona VOL. XXXV NO. 6 JUNE 1959 You can't always tell by the cool calculations of the RAYMOND CARLSON, Editor calendar or the bobbing babble of the thermometer. The GEORGE M. A VEY, Art Editor testimony of the wayward sun is not always reliable. You JAMES E . STEVENS, Business Manager awaken one fine morning and for some indefinable reason LEGEND you know summer is just around the corner. There is a languor in the shadows and a soft sleepiness in the air that ARIZONA'S TIM BERED TREASURE 2 FORESTS OF STATE PRODUCE RICHES bespeak summer's approach. There is a drowsiness in the IN I.UMB E, R, Rf:C REATJO NAL ACTIVITIES. gossip of the green, green leaves caressed by the soft, THE PARADOX OF A LA\'A FLOW 8 warm breeze. You know that spring has had her Ring VOLCANIC ERUPTIONS IN NORTHERN ARIZONA CHANGED ENRICHED LAND. and another season is getting ready to cavort over the AN ARIZONA S ui\ Ii\TER VACATION landscape. //~-- ~.-.....,, ~ - JF YOU PL AN YO UR VACATION W"ELL, YOU'LL HAVE ONE COOL AND CAREFREE. we afe -n'i uch conce'_r.n'ea with summer this issue and SNOW IN JuLY 28 our p/ ges are an invitatiot~ ''.1} y ou to plan a cool and WHCN YOU CLIMB SA N FRANCISCO PEAKS careffee vacation in, our state.·, AiJ 'Of Northern Arizona ' , ,_ •. • IN J ULY YOU RUN INTO SURPRISES. is a huge sm:nmer v,ac~ti911 playgrouh~, where the scenery LONG MEADOW RANCH 34 is superb aricF1th.~' )-v:i::i:ther admirable -' for those who like Tms RANCH IN YAVAPAI COUNTY IS ONE //;') \ .
    [Show full text]
  • Early Detection and Identification of the Main Fungal Pathogens
    Article Early Detection and Identification of the Main Fungal Pathogens for Resistance Evaluation of New Genotypes of Forest Trees Konstantin A. Shestibratov 1, Oleg Yu. Baranov 2, Natalya M. Subbotina 1, Vadim G. Lebedev 1, Stanislav V. Panteleev 2, Konstantin V. Krutovsky 3,4,5,6,* and Vladimir E. Padutov 2 1 Forest Biotechnology Group, Branch of Shemyakin and Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 6 Prospect Nauki, Pushchino, Moscow 142290, Russia; [email protected] (K.A.S.); [email protected] (N.M.S.); [email protected] (V.G.L.) 2 Laboratory for Genetics and Biotechnology, Forest Research Institute, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 71 Proletarskaya Str., Gomel 246001, Belarus; [email protected] (O.Y.B.); [email protected] (S.V.P.); [email protected] (V.E.P.) 3 Department of Forest Genetics and Forest Tree Breeding, George-August University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 2, 37077 Göttingen, Germany 4 Laboratory of Population Genetics, Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Gubkina Str. 3, Moscow 119991, Russia 5 Laboratory of Forest Genomics, Genome Research and Education Center, Institute of Fundamental Biology and Biotechnology, Siberian Federal University, Akademgorodok, 50a/2, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia 6 Department of Ecosystem Sciences and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2138, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-551-339-3537 Received: 31 October 2018; Accepted: 19 November 2018; Published: 23 November 2018 Abstract: The growing importance of forest plantations increases the demand for phytopathogen resistant forest trees. This study describes an effective method for early detection and identification of the main fungal phytopathogens in planting material of silver birch (Betula pendula) and downy birch (B.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Clades of Agaricales: a Multilocus Phylogenetic Overview
    Mycologia, 98(6), 2006, pp. 982–995. # 2006 by The Mycological Society of America, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897 Major clades of Agaricales: a multilocus phylogenetic overview P. Brandon Matheny1 Duur K. Aanen Judd M. Curtis Laboratory of Genetics, Arboretumlaan 4, 6703 BD, Biology Department, Clark University, 950 Main Street, Wageningen, The Netherlands Worcester, Massachusetts, 01610 Matthew DeNitis Vale´rie Hofstetter 127 Harrington Way, Worcester, Massachusetts 01604 Department of Biology, Box 90338, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 Graciela M. Daniele Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biologı´a Vegetal, M. Catherine Aime CONICET-Universidad Nacional de Co´rdoba, Casilla USDA-ARS, Systematic Botany and Mycology de Correo 495, 5000 Co´rdoba, Argentina Laboratory, Room 304, Building 011A, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-2350 Dennis E. Desjardin Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, Jean-Marc Moncalvo San Francisco, California 94132 Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, Royal Ontario Museum and Department of Botany, University Bradley R. Kropp of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2C6 Canada Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322 Zai-Wei Ge Zhu-Liang Yang Lorelei L. Norvell Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Pacific Northwest Mycology Service, 6720 NW Skyline Sciences, Kunming 650204, P.R. China Boulevard, Portland, Oregon 97229-1309 Jason C. Slot Andrew Parker Biology Department, Clark University, 950 Main Street, 127 Raven Way, Metaline Falls, Washington 99153- Worcester, Massachusetts, 01609 9720 Joseph F. Ammirati Else C. Vellinga University of Washington, Biology Department, Box Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, 111 355325, Seattle, Washington 98195 Koshland Hall, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3102 Timothy J.
    [Show full text]
  • Chetco Bar Fire Salvage Project Comment Analysis Page 1 Of
    Chetco Bar Fire Salvage Project Comment Analysis Response and Concern Status Report Generated: 6/22/2018 12:48 PM Project: Chetco Fire Salvage Project (53150) Comment Period: Other - 30-Day Comment and ESD Comment Period Period Dates: 4/16/2018 - 5/16/2018 and 5/18/2018 - 6/18/2018 Name Comment Text Response Text Comment # ESD Comments Received 5/18/2018 - 6/18/2018 Vaile, Joseph 1-2 An ESD may prove counterproductive to the goals of the agency, if it The Forest Service has been engaging the public in a robust and thorough process since the prevents meaningful mitigation measures to the proposed action. The Chetco Bar fire began. Refer also to the response to comment 1-1 for more information on use of the ESD may prevent the Forest Service from engaging the public design criteria and evaluation for feasibility. in a robust and thorough planning process that could be accomplished through an objection process. Page 1 of 341 Chetco Bar Fire Salvage Project Comment Analysis Name Comment Text Response Text 1-5 Please note that the discussion of the agency's desire for an ESD at page The EA states "An additional consideration is the health and safety of forest visitors and 2-6 of the Chetco Bar Fire Salvage EA makes reference to a concern for nearby private landowners due to numerous dead trees, as well as Forest Service staff and "the health and safety of forest visitors." We wholeheartedly agree that forest industry workers working in the Chetco Bar Fire Salvage project area. Traveling or this is a legitimate concern.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section, Southwestern Colorado & Northwestern New Mexico
    Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section, Southwestern Colorado & Northwestern New Mexico William H. Romme, M. Lisa Floyd, David Hanna with contributions by Elisabeth J. Bartlett, Michele Crist, Dan Green, Henri D. Grissino-Mayer, J. Page Lindsey, Kevin McGarigal, & Jeffery S.Redders Produced by the Colorado Forest Restoration Institute at Colorado State University, and Region 2 of the U.S. Forest Service May 12, 2009 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY … p 5 AUTHORS’ AFFILIATIONS … p 16 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS … p 16 CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION A. Objectives and Organization of This Report … p 17 B. Overview of Physical Geography and Vegetation … p 19 C. Climate Variability in Space and Time … p 21 1. Geographic Patterns in Climate 2. Long-Term Variability in Climate D. Reference Conditions: Concept and Application … p 25 1. Historical Range of Variability (HRV) Concept 2. The Reference Period for this Analysis 3. Human Residents and Influences during the Reference Period E. Overview of Integrated Ecosystem Management … p 30 F. Literature Cited … p 34 CHAPTER II. PONDEROSA PINE FORESTS A. Vegetation Structure and Composition … p 39 B. Reference Conditions … p 40 1. Reference Period Fire Regimes 2. Other agents of disturbance 3. Pre-1870 stand structures C. Legacies of Euro-American Settlement and Current Conditions … p 67 1. Logging (“High-Grading”) in the Late 1800s and Early 1900s 2. Excessive Livestock Grazing in the Late 1800s and Early 1900s 3. Fire Exclusion Since the Late 1800s 4. Interactions: Logging, Grazing, Fire, Climate, and the Forests of Today D. Summary … p 83 E. Literature Cited … p 84 CHAPTER III.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Conifers in New Mexico Landscapes
    Ornamental Horticulture Common Conifers in New Mexico Landscapes Bob Cain, Extension Forest Entomologist One-Seed Juniper (Juniperus monosperma) Description: One-seed juniper grows 20-30 feet high and is multistemmed. Its leaves are scalelike with finely toothed margins. One-seed cones are 1/4-1/2 inch long berrylike structures with a reddish brown to bluish hue. The cones or “berries” mature in one year and occur only on female trees. Male trees produce Alligator Juniper (Juniperus deppeana) pollen and appear brown in the late winter and spring compared to female trees. Description: The alligator juniper can grow up to 65 feet tall, and may grow to 5 feet in diameter. It resembles the one-seed juniper with its 1/4-1/2 inch long, berrylike structures and typical juniper foliage. Its most distinguishing feature is its bark, which is divided into squares that resemble alligator skin. Other Characteristics: • Ranges throughout the semiarid regions of the southern two-thirds of New Mexico, southeastern and central Arizona, and south into Mexico. Other Characteristics: • An American Forestry Association Champion • Scattered distribution through the southern recently burned in Tonto National Forest, Arizona. Rockies (mostly Arizona and New Mexico) It was 29 feet 7 inches in circumference, 57 feet • Usually a bushy appearance tall, and had a 57-foot crown. • Likes semiarid, rocky slopes • If cut down, this juniper can sprout from the stump. Uses: Uses: • Birds use the berries of the one-seed juniper as a • Alligator juniper is valuable to wildlife, but has source of winter food, while wildlife browse its only localized commercial value.
    [Show full text]
  • FEIS for Arizona Snowbowl Facilities Improvements
    United States Department of Agriculture Final Environmental Forest Service Impact Statement Southwestern Region for Arizona Snowbowl February 2005 Facilities Improvements Volume 2 Response to Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Coconino National Forest Coconino County, Arizona FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE ARIZONA SNOWBOWL FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSAL VOLUME 2 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT COCONINO NATIONAL FOREST COCONINO COUNTY, ARIZONA FEBRUARY 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................1 1.0 NEPA PROCESS...........................................................................................................................................3 2.0 USFS POLICY.............................................................................................................................................13 3.0 DOCUMENT STRUCTURE......................................................................................................................19 4.0 MODIFIED ALTERNATIVES..................................................................................................................21 5.0 CULTURAL RESOURCES .......................................................................................................................25 6.0 WATER RESOURCES ..............................................................................................................................40
    [Show full text]
  • Colegio De Postgraduados
    COLEGIO DE POSTGRADUADOS Director General Dr. Félix V. González Cossio Secretario General Dr. Francisco Gabi Reyes Secretario Administrativo Lic. Guillermo Díaz Landeros Responsable Editorial Colegio de Postgraduados Primera Edición 2011 © Editores: Dr. Armando Equihua Martínez y Dra. Edith Estrada Venegas Jesús Alberto Acuña Soto y Martha Patricia Cháirez Grijalva. © Para la presente edición, Colegio de Postgraduados Carretera México-Texcoco, Km 36.5, 56230 Montecillo, Texcoco, Estado de México. Miembro número 306 CANIEM © D.R. Todos los derechos reservados conforme a la Ley No está permitida la reproducción total o parcial de esta publicación, ni la trasmisión de ninguna forma o cualquier medio, ya sea electrónico, mecánico, fotocopia por registro u otros medios, sin el permiso previo y escrito de la institución. Impreso y hecho en México. Printed and made in Mexico. ISBN: 978-607-7533-84-9 CONTENIDO PRESENTACIÓN INDICADORES DE LA SALUD DEL BOSQUE LA CONDICIÓN DE COPA COMO INDICADOR DE SALUD FORESTAL EN LOS BOSQUES DE 2 MÉXICO. Dionicio Alvarado Rosales y Luz de Lourdes Saavedra Romero. DIVERSIDAD VEGETAL COMO INDICADORA DE LA SALUD FORESTAL A PARTIR DE 7 DATOS DEL INVENTARIO NACIONAL FORESTAL Y SUELOS. Patricia Hernández de la Rosa. DAÑOS AL ARBOLADO COMO INDICADOR DE SALUD FORESTAL EN LOS BOSQUES DE 13 MÉXICO. Dionicio Alvarado Rosales y Luz de Lourdes Saavedra Romero. LOS RESIDUOS MADERABLES CAÍDOS COMO INDICADORES DE SALUD FORESTAL EN 18 LOS BOSQUES DE MÉXICO. Dionicio Alvarado Rosales y Luz de Lourdes Saavedra Romero. BIOLOGÍA Y ECOLOGÍA DINÁMICA DE PERTURBACIONES EN BOSQUES DE PINOS PROVOCADAS POR 24 INSECTOS DESCORTEZADORES EN PUEBLOS MANCOMUNADOS, OAXACA, MÉXICO.
    [Show full text]
  • Descriptors for Hazelnut (Corylus Avellana L.)
    Descriptors for Hazelnut(Corylus avellana L.) List of Descriptors Allium (E, S) 2001 Pearl millet (E/F) 1993 Almond (revised)* (E) 1985 Pepino (E) 2004 Apple* (E) 1982 Phaseolus acutifolius (E) 1985 Apricot* (E) 1984 Phaseolus coccineus* (E) 1983 Avocado (E/S) 1995 Phaseolus lunatus (P) 2001 Bambara groundnut (E, F) 2000 Phaseolus vulgaris* (E, P) 1982 Banana (E, S, F) 1996 Pigeonpea (E) 1993 Barley (E) 1994 Pineapple (E) 1991 Beta (E) 1991 Pistachio (A, R, E, F) 1997 Black pepper (E/S) 1995 Pistacia (excluding Pistacia vera) (E) 1998 Brassica and Raphanus (E) 1990 Plum* (E) 1985 Brassica campestris L. (E) 1987 Potato variety* (E) 1985 Buckwheat (E) 1994 Quinua* (E) 1981 Cañahua (S) 2005 Rambutan 2003 Capsicum (E/S) 1995 Rice* (E) 2007 Cardamom (E) 1994 Rocket (E, I) 1999 Carrot (E, S, F) 1998 Rye and Triticale* (E) 1985 Cashew* (E) 1986 Safflower* (E) 1983 Cherry* (E) 1985 Sesame (E) 2004 Chickpea (E) 1993 Setaria italica and S. pumilia (E) 1985 Citrus (E, F, S) 1999 Shea tree (E) 2006 Coconut (E) 1995 Sorghum (E/F) 1993 Coffee (E, S, F) 1996 Soyabean* (E/C) 1984 Cotton (revised)* (E) 1985 Strawberry (E) 1986 Cowpea (E, P)* 1983 Sunflower* (E) 1985 Cultivated potato* (E) 1977 Sweet potato (E/S/F) 1991 Date Palm (F) 2005 Taro (E, F, S) 1999 Durian (E) 2007 Tea (E, S, F) 1997 Echinochloa millet* (E) 1983 Tomato (E, S, F) 1996 Eggplant (E/F) 1990 Tropical fruit (revised)* (E) 1980 Faba bean* (E) 1985 Ulluco (S) 2003 Fig (E) 2003 Vigna aconitifolia and V.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for the USA (W7A
    Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) Summits on the Air U.S.A. (W7A - Arizona) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S53.1 Issue number 5.0 Date of issue 31-October 2020 Participation start date 01-Aug 2010 Authorized Date: 31-October 2020 Association Manager Pete Scola, WA7JTM Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Document S53.1 Page 1 of 15 Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) TABLE OF CONTENTS CHANGE CONTROL....................................................................................................................................... 3 DISCLAIMER................................................................................................................................................. 4 1 ASSOCIATION REFERENCE DATA ........................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Program Derivation ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 General Information ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Final Ascent
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests DRAFT Wilderness Evaluation Report August 2018
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests DRAFT Wilderness Evaluation Report August 2018 Designated in the original Wilderness Act of 1964, the Maroon Bells-Snowmass Wilderness covers more than 183,000 acres spanning the Gunnison and White River National Forests. In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form.
    [Show full text]